TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

coolironyguy Archive

View 0 posts and 49 comments by coolironyguy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

In the case of the OP it's probably just that she's not getting approached by the kinds of guys she thinks she deserves.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/15 03:15 PM
1

Elevatorgate was an event that was followed with a bunch of unsubtantiated allegations about atheist conventions and an attempt to get them to kowtow to the progressive-feminist-SJW worldview by instituting actual Stalnist-type policies. The actual elevatorgate event itself was Rebecca Watson, a coattail-riding groupie type, complaining that (by her own account) some guy hit on her in an elevator and took the rejection gracefully. This was blown out of proportion by her with all of the usual rap…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/15 03:10 PM
3

Alcohol only lowers your inhibitions. So that's the proximal cause. The ultimate cause is what I've said.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/15 01:41 PM
8

Part of it absolutely is.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/15 01:22 PM
4

This is essentially a postmodernist admitting through word salad and a small amount of statements structured like lines of programming code that the pesky Darwinian theory that the people he associates with tend to hate so much is basically correct. The video would have been better and more accessible if he had included examples in real terms, but that's the gist of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/15 10:22 AM
0

I'm sure at rare times it happens but for the most part when women cheat, especially when they are married it tends to be with a guy who looks better than their current relationship partner, and especially when they judge that there's going to be no hopping out of one committed relationship and into another. A guy being a surfer, stoner, drug dealer or whatnot really says nothing about any of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/15 10:09 AM
2

This is wrong. Hypergamy is the female going for the best male she FEELS she can get. This is why girls do illogical shit like cheating on a med school student with a surfer. To males, we can easily deduce logically that the med student is the better choice of male, but IN THE MOMENT, she FELT the surfer was the better Alpha, and so cheated. This scenario is just the classic female dual sexual strategy as noted in many animal species including various types of birds. The med school student is th…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/15 09:48 AM
2

Those two actually do talk a lot. They're just drowned out by the massive amounts of lunatics and are actually regularly disowned by the feminist masses for being heretics who don't buy into their wacky male original sin type beliefs.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/15 04:37 AM
2

Wrong. How many Camille Paglias and Christina Hoff Sommers' do you think there actually are. Doesn't seem very many.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/15 04:05 AM
0

Biggest collection of strawmen in a single post I think I've ever seen. Atheists dealt with your type before. The same lies, the same tactics used against gamergate. Difference: the gamers as a group had more of a collective spine and didn't capitulate to the bullying and media propaganda. They fought back. Unlike with the atheist/skeptic community where it was only a few big names like Thunderf00t that took a stand against it. So well it seems that politically motivated reddit admins made up sp…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/15 04:00 AM
2

Paragraphs, you gishgalloping lunatic.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/15 03:57 AM
1

Julian Assange and his false rape accusations don't have anything to do with the Swedish model of prostitution laws. It is a model that originated in Sweden, was adopted by Norway and recently Canada. Under it, the buyers (men) are breaking the law but the sellers (female prostitutes) are not. It's based on a lot of bad assumptions that feminists make such as that somehow a large percentage or even majority of prostitutes in the first world are being exploited or trafficked rather than just maki…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/15 03:14 AM
0

The social justice warrior term has spread in the last few years. It's now used by just about everyone who's heard the term and who isn't one. The vast majority of people who talk about them--atheists because of the elevatorgate/atheism+ disaster, tumblrinaction because they find these people repugnant and eminently mockable, gamergate people because of similar reasons to the atheists and the atheism+ episode--have absolutely nothing to do with "terps" and unless told what they are and introduce…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/15 03:10 AM
1

Feminism doesn't make laws to hurt men. Except when they do. Couple examples: Swedish model of prostitution laws. Rape shield laws and the continuing attempt to erode due process. Policies that directly affect the law enforcement process, like the Duluth model. Again the point is sailing over YOUR head. She's saying feminism isn't what it claims to be, this big tent of "EQUALITY FOR EVERYONE." It's not that. It's never working on men's behalf. Ever. Politically it's a special interest group for …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/15 12:51 AM
1

Once again, the point did sail over your head. She isn't saying feminism caused these disparities, she's saying that feminists claim to be all about dat equality except that they aren't because they don't bring any of this up and will in fact get irrationally angry when you point out where women have it better in the very same countries. This isn't even an appeal to worse circumstances to other countries. This is some apples to apples comparisons. Couple examples; Reproductive rights? Women have…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 11:33 PM
5

Probably because there's incentive to act that way. There's incentive to marry what TRPers call a "beta bucks" guy and then "better deal" him while taking things from him using the full force of the legal system. The shitty behavior is rewarded, so why change? Incentives matter. It's not like they're saying don't date them, they're saying don't get serious with them. That's pretty common sense for a variety of reasons, even if you ignore the obvious Darwinian reason of paternity certainty.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 11:08 PM
2

It's like the point sailed over your head and you selectively listened to what she had to say. Feminists claim that they're "FOR EQUALITY" and that "feminism is for men too!" and that "we're totally working on your issues too, guys!" (except they're not and don't care about them, and will get hostile if you have the temerity to even bring them up). So it's a woman's lobby. That's it. It's for getting women goodies, and it does so by claiming women are always disadvantaged even when they're not. …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 11:04 PM
3

This isn't SRS or SRD or your other satellite subs.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 08:33 PM
1

I imagine it's a lot like waking up next to someone who's really good at applying makeup but looks vastly different and worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 04:57 PM
1

No it would make you more wrong because your entire argument is wishy-washy pop culture and social constructionist bullshit. Peace.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 04:54 PM
1

I think it was around 2004-2005 I first started seeing a lot of these discussions popping up and 2009 is when mainstream feminist mouthpieces started running propaganda against MRAs specifically because they were the biggest visible group talking about these issues at the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 04:31 PM
1

It was getting big before that.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 04:15 PM
1

Women who make their own money still as a rule mate upwards. You will find no shortage of professional women who complain they can't "find good men" (read: better than them)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 04:10 PM
1

Liberal creationism is this idea that evolution is real but somehow stopped wherever it's politically convenient for the kind of person who engages in this behavior. Whether it be IQ, race, sex differences, behavioral differences. Good examples of this are Stephen Jay Gould leading mobs against Edward O. Wilson, the author of "Sociobiology" and arguably one of the most influential academic figures when it comes to the formation of evolutionary psychology. More recently, the humanities frauds exp…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 04:08 PM
1

I don't make up the rules. I just observe how relationships work in the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 03:44 PM
1

Yes, something is more wrong. The anti-intellectual, anti-scientific SRS/progressive stuff that says everything's a social construct, except when it's conveniently not for X carpetbagging political reasons. The whole liberal creationism thing. That's what /r/thebluepill posters are by and large into. Hope this helps.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 03:35 PM
1

I'm aware of the concept. The whole "liberal creationism" thing where they claim that evolution is real but somehow stops at wherever it's politically inconvenient for them. Whether that be from the head up, or behavioral differences, or whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 02:43 PM
1

Well, no that outcome doesn't itself have anything to do with communism. Communism is incompatible with human nature and assumptions that communists make assume that there would be equal and good outcomes in such a scenario, whereas experiments like this or larger scaler disasters like the 20th century communist regimes show otherwise. It's all built on the assumption that everything is a social construct and that we're all essentially "good" and that no one will fuck other people over for their…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 02:36 PM
8

"Hate groups" like Dr. Warren Farrel, the least offensive, most soft spoken man ever. Sounds legit. I guess if you disagree with them they become "hate" and this isn't Orwellian at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 01:47 PM
1

Let's say we have a man, and he's the most attractive man in the universe. Why bother even then? There's still no benefit to having a woman you have to pay for the upkeep of in this kind of relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 01:05 PM
0

No I don't think they'll be successful at all going against human behavioral biology, but I do think that shifting economic pressures (see Greece and the very real possibility that kind of situation will spread) may cause some very drastic changes to the current order.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 12:54 PM
1

De facto harems where the guys who put the most effort into the upkeep of the communes got the least out of it. "Free love" wasn't free at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 12:53 PM
0

No, for the most part they really aren't. There are a few small jurisdictions where a man can have support payments stopped by proving he isn't the father. He still won't be recompensated or see any justice, though. It's a form of fraud and it's still not considered a crime for women to do this. The law isn't really adjusting to this decades-old technological reality at all. And even before that blood typing could exclude men as fathers based on an impossible resultant child's blood type.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 12:46 PM
1

I guess I technically already am in terms of rejecting any kind of legal entanglements. Any man who is sane and knows how the legal system works in a vague sense on these issues is the same way and I think the fact that the vast majority of men under the age of 35 have never been married really speaks volumes about the current state of things. In the gender politics arena I probably agree with the mgtow guys the most as well. They seem to have the least invested when it comes to "having a dog in…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 12:37 PM
1

A man who must pay for the "privilege" of keeping a woman who will go around behind his back is a cuckold. Sorry. It doesn't matter that he technically has the option to go fuck other women. Why have a relationship at all in this case? It doesn't benefit a man at all to accept these kinds of terms of a relationship. Also, the laws won't be updated. It's been 30 years. They still aren't changed to account for the technology that exists and the reality that we can now actually tell whether a man i…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 12:24 PM
1

No they won't change. It's been 30 years since the technology has been around and the laws are still being filibustered because no one gives a fuck about low status, or disadvantaged men being fucked over and this is never going to change. Worse still because it's "good for women" to be able to do this and screw over some guys, every time someone tries to do something like suggest mandatory paternity testing this is the grounds that it's pushed back against on; it's bad for women!!! PROTECT THE …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 12:22 PM
1

I think more ISIS-style jihadis and the like would be the obvious immediate result to the obvious situation that would occur; polygyny shutting out an even larger percentage of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 12:16 PM
0

That doesn't solve the issues they're talking about at all. The "betas" in this case are still being taken advantage of and this is just you saying that them being de facto cuckolds somehow solves problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 12:02 PM
11

If you raise a boy with critical thinking skills then chances are unless he is the top of the heap in terms of natural physical attractiveness, he is going to find something like TRP to be truer than any other philosophy on these subjects because they are simply less wrong about what's going on than everyone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/15 07:36 PM
4

It's like punishing drug users, but not the dealers. It's insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/15 03:18 PM
7

That is correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/15 03:15 PM
4

How about we go into some very real legislation. "The Swedish model" of prostitution laws, recently adopted by Canada even though it was shown in both Sweden and Norway to be a complete disaster that makes things worse for the actual sex workers. Which of course those who pushed the model don't really care about and sometimes openly admit that. I watched this recently in which it's made explicitly clear that manhating feminists, with their unlikely bedfellows in religious conservatives, pushed t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/15 03:00 PM
3

Such as? I know it's not your job to educate the shitlords, but please do in this instance. I can't name any more cultures which are more "sexually liberated" than the United States of America and all of the other nations that aped what started to happen there in the 1960s.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/15 02:54 PM
1

How to poison the well in one sentence, by the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/15 11:34 AM
2

My understanding is that you have most men with a lower number, while a small percentage have an astoundingly high number because women, especially young women, are preoccupied with providing harems to a small percentage of unusually attractive men. That is what I understand the entire premise of the "cock carousel" to be. That these other guys who weren't the first picks and weren't getting plenty of easy sexual access in their youth should be wary of the vast majority of women who, nearing or …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/15 10:24 AM
1

I heard this is the actual reason: http://i.imgur.com/6HLNz7i.jpg You can quote me on this, friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/15 10:13 AM
1

Aren't most pro athletes not the smartest tools in the shed and end up wasting all of the money they earn in years? Kind of like a lot of lottery winners.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/15 09:33 AM
5

No no, you see it really works: That's why "Nice Guys" (with the quotation marks) are being demonized as horrible shitlords who need to be castrated and have their balls stomped on. Because it works. Really. Honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/15 09:31 AM
3

No, it seems they think (and are right) that women are treated like children even when they have done egregious wrongs. That they are not held to equal standards, no matter what we claim. "Equality" is something that cannot exist when one sex is just more innately valuable and has the innate in-group preference of both sexes and the "protect the women" instinct working in their favor. And that they seem incapable of much in the way of compromise which shows a fatal flaw in the democratic process…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/15 01:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter