TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

coops678 Archive

View 2 posts and 80 comments by coops678 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

Marriage/Childrencoops678/r/MensRights16/10/17 07:16 PM
2

Discriminationcoops678/r/MensRights16/12/17 01:27 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I have missed nothing as there was no relevant point in your original statement and no relevant answer to OP's question. Popularity has no bearing on the validity of your statement and appealing to authority is not a valid defense. But I do wish you well and hope that your weekend is an enjoyable one.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/12/17 03:24 AM
0

Your statement may be "logical fact" in some circumstances (the term you are actually looking for is logical consequence) but your statement is also a logical fallacy in the context of the point that was originally raised. OP was looking for an answer to a specific question and did not get one from you. Instead OP got a straw man argument... From both of your comments.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/12/17 02:57 AM
1

I see the issue with my wording now: The pension age was raised (for everyone) in 2011. This is the law that the WASPIs are protesting. The WASPIs are not protesting changes from 1995 and stating that law did not address or answer OP's question.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/12/17 02:23 AM
-2

Logical fallacy.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/17 11:15 PM
1

And the recent law about raising the pension age again that the WASPIs are protesting was passed in 2011.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/17 11:14 PM
1

Hi there, UK based here: the answer is yes. It is about the timescale of change being introduced with insufficient notice (in some cases 1 year's notice for a change of 6 years). WASPI women do not argue against female retirement age being brought inline with men. They are concerned about not having proper time to plan ahead.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/17 11:12 PM
1

Ha! Exactly. It shouldn't be trumpeted as "good for women" when it could be trumpeted as good for everyone. But that is a point for the company's marketing team I guess.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 02:37 PM
2

When I was at school a female friend of mine was raped. She came from a super religious in a negative way family so telling them about it was a big no no. She would likely have been disowned rather than supported. She told her closest friends and that was it. For her she took a test during her lunchbreak in the bathroom at her weekend job. It came back negative, she was able to dispose of the test there and her family never found out. I'd prefer it if the article made a link to taking tests at w…
/r/MensRights16/12/17 02:30 PM
3

Think of it from this standpoint: the majority of public toilets, including those in workplaces, have sanitary disposal bins in which a used pregnancy test could be put. This disposable one could work for situations where that isn't the case or for people who wish to be environmentally conscious. The thing that stumps me is that pregnancy tests are effectively a variation of a litmus paper test: the strip itself is traditionally made from paper. They are disposable if they're not put in a plasti…
/r/MensRights16/12/17 02:19 PM
2

I would argue that whatever is done during a break at work is anyone's choice.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 02:11 PM
3

Indeed. And some of it was even created by women such as Marie curie and Florence nightingale.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 02:10 PM
2

exactly. The feminist fails to recognise trans-identity issues as a gender issue but instead as a sex issue (which is actually a hard-line opinion of Ben Shapiro btw - don't tell the feminist!). She is choosing to side sweep the protected category rights of trans people in favour of the protected category of women and I find it frustratingly sad.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 02:06 PM
3

I view this differently to what the title suggests. The feminist is creating straw man arguments to promote her own agenda and ignore the issue being discussed: the gender discrimination act. Her arguments are jaw droppingly weak and unscrupulous outwith her own limited scope. She is called out by the presenter (Richard) and the transgender women as dodging and missing the point. Well done them! This rough transcription of what is said from 6mins onward is effectively discriminatory of gender re…
/r/MensRights16/12/17 02:00 PM
2

Too true imo.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 02:21 PM
1

As I pointed out, my specific issue is with the second part of that sentence "but the crime of rape lasts a few minutes". The rest of your comment doesn't match the sentiment of your reply in regards to difficulties in overcoming rape. Tagging it before the word "but" makes it come across glibly. I agree with the second part of your next paragraph in reply even if it does paint broad brush strokes. Vindicating an individual of the crime of rape/harrassment does not necessarily draw a line under …
/r/MensRights06/12/17 02:15 PM
14

Uhm... The crime of rape lasts an amount of time but the repercussions last a lot longer than a few minutes. The memories can be like being raped over and over every day with no take backs. The fear that it could happen again, even with a trusted loved one, is still there too as are the flashbacks and the memories. Source: I've been raped. I don't disagree with the jist of what your saying, this women and what she did is horrific. I'd also be pedantic and suggest that this officer won't get over…
/r/MensRights05/12/17 03:31 PM
2

Here's a link to an article that she wrote about his suicide and her thoughts about it: here
/r/MensRights02/12/17 02:04 PM
15

Gosh! If the boss woman had the courage to stand up from the outset and enforce strict ground rules I wonder if the company could have faired better. It comes across as weak leadership in the extreme. And the staff sounded HORRIBLE!!!
/r/MensRights15/11/17 11:51 PM
34

Didn't something pop up on Reddit recently along the lines of how scientists used an MRI scan whilst babies were circumcised which demonstrated irreparable changes to the babies' brains? The paper was not allowed to be published as the methods apparently contradicted ethical considerations.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 11:25 AM
2

That's very kind of you :) My work currently is mostly home tuition (4 days), some nursery workshops (2 mornings), and a morning of tuition for the local authority. It's a good mix. I've started noticing that some of my parents say they are bringing their kids to music lessons in the hope that they learn a hobby that takes them away from their computer/phone. I sense this will become more prominent as time goes by! I started my home tuition specifically because of authority cuts. Turns out I ear…
/r/MensRights10/11/17 10:45 AM
1

It's occassional and far between (I'm a music teacher) but it makes it much more important for us to be vigilant for spotting things and we get 1-2 refresher training sessions each year.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 09:12 PM
3

It's an area that we had hammered home during child protection training at work. Any (perceived) damage to the head is very serious and to be reported immediately.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 05:54 PM
2

"Got community service and 8 months suspended sentence at young offenders" Not quite, she may have been 18 at the time she went to trial but if she was sentenced at young offenders then it's very likely that she was under-18 at the time of the crime therefore still technically a minor. She was probably sentenced in line with the maximum allowance for what I assume would have been a first time offence.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 04:04 PM
1

In Malcolm Tucker style it's arguably this: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/11/britain-sex-dossier-scandal
/r/MensRights07/11/17 09:28 PM
1

I can actually see the point that the interviewee might be trying to make. One issue discussed to a degree by third wave feminists is that the wide range of birth control methods available to women puts the onus of contraception on the female therefore making it oppressive, patriarchal, sexist, unfair etc. etc. Perhaps the suggestion that females boards/CEOs would be beneficial ties into this idea: that they would advocate for more male contraceptives for these reasons. Anyway, my point is conje…
/r/MensRights03/11/17 01:52 PM
2

Actually, my understanding is that second wave feminism views sex workers unfavourably because it's objectification and control. Third wave feminists tend to view sex workers and porn as the choice of the female and empowering to boot.
/r/MensRights03/11/17 09:01 AM
1

I saw an interesting Ben Shapiro video about this. He spoke about how willingly engaging in casting couch sex does not count as rape as consent is implied. However, rape/assault technically counts at the point that any party says no and the other continues. Also, if there is any degree of coercion on the part of Weinstein then that too could count. The stories I've bothered to read so far have mostly been from folks escaping a near miss with him. But I also believe that some folks likely slept w…
/r/MensRights03/11/17 08:55 AM
2

Thank you. I'm here all night!!
/r/MensRights02/11/17 06:56 PM
3

Something similar happened to me on a date that I went on one Friday night. I ended up with a black eye from it. I was in high school at the time and had really shitty friends. I had a weekend to stew over what I was gonna do about it. On Monday at school I was scared about all the questions particularly seeing as I had a big black mark on my face. When my group of friends saw it they all keeled over laughing about how much of an idiot I was to have gotten a black eye. I decided to tell them not…
/r/MensRights02/11/17 10:03 AM
4

Lol, do you want me to mansplain an answer to you???
/r/MensRights02/11/17 09:08 AM
20

On an unrelated note one really bugged me recently: we were asked to read a couple chapters in preparation for a uni lecture on research methods. One of my classmates was complaining about the reading and said "it was like the author was mansplaining the whole thing to me. And of course, it was written by men. Like they just had to find a way to make the little women understand research methods". In my head I thought "there's no way that the authors wrote a book specifically for one gender or wi…
/r/MensRights01/11/17 11:09 PM
60

I agree. It's like: is your wife cheating? You must not have given her enough attention. Are you failing at work? You must not be trying hard enough. Does your kid hate you? It must be cos your cold and aloof. Is your marriage in trouble? You must have spent too much time on your hobbies. Did your wife gain custody? That's cos she the mother, father's can't look after kids effectively. These are the stereotypes I sense on a regular basis.
/r/MensRights01/11/17 11:04 PM
5

I'm really sorry that this happened to you and that no-one seems to have taken you seriously. Did the initial reaction scare you off from reporting it? Or I guess, did you ever consider reporting it?
/r/MensRights01/11/17 06:49 PM
482

Yep, a conversation with my partner about sexual harassment and sexual abuse revealed that he had been sexually assaulteed at more than one point in his life but seeing as he's a man I guess that it doesn't count (/s).
/r/MensRights01/11/17 01:38 PM
1

Well it is Reddit. I guess that the positive is that you'll be doing the next one sober as a monk, infront of the computer, and with iron-tight spell check on hand. I do hope that something positive comes out of it. And I hope that anyone who hasn't done something similar but criticised you for grammar instead does something themselves about a men's rights issue outwith this sub.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 10:12 PM
2

Probs best pop this info in as an edit to the original post.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 08:31 PM
3

Probs best pop this info in as an edit to the original post.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 08:30 PM
2

I'm with you dude. The right sentiment was there.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 08:26 PM
1

Why create a straw man argument when the point is that the OP did something arguably positive (albeit whilst purportedly drunk) about a men's rights issue?
/r/MensRights22/10/17 08:25 PM
3

Indeed it is and I can sense your frustration from that point onwards in relation to the way that the NHS is viewed as being run. I'm curious to know who/what department you sent it to? I'm wondering if a particular person or department will be more useful to send to than another or if emailing to many people ought to be better. Also, if you don't receive a timely response (maybe 14 days) then perhaps you would want to consider emailing again but informing a couple newspapers that you have done …
/r/MensRights22/10/17 08:16 PM
71

I agree. There's no call to action in the correspondence (e.g. can you detail what action you are taking, can you provide information on, can you demonstrate that this is being addressed etc.). From the word 'disgusting' onwards I sense that the email will be left to rot in an inbox. I hope not though and commend the OPs effort.
/r/MensRights22/10/17 06:53 PM
1

See, this I like. Same style, different colour of jacket. Simple and to the point. I skimmed and found this She don't give a damn.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 11:21 AM
1

Well I still did. And I agree with the Vanessa Lussier look being awesome.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 12:24 AM
1

That gave me a good laugh. Thank you.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 12:15 AM
0

As per the article he said she consented to sex (thereby she would have cheated on her bf), she says she was taken advantage of. Truthfully I believe she got drunk, cheated on her bf, and came up with a bs rape story to explain her actions but I'm not willing to simply state that. After all I'm assuming she had to explain for not being home for a night or disappearing off the radar if her bf had tried getting in touch with her. Maybe he did take advantage of her, maybe she took advantage of him.…
/r/MensRights21/10/17 12:13 AM
1

Do you search for articles through Google scholar yet?
/r/MensRights20/10/17 11:24 PM
1

Don't you literally have the best user name to comment on a swimsuit photo shoot??
/r/MensRights20/10/17 11:13 PM
1

Do you have screenshots of what you posted that you could share? I'd be interested to see what they banned you over.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 11:06 PM
8

Omg. This is scary as hell. And the following comments were taken from the FAQs: "I am a man, and I was raped. Can I submit a photo? No, this is a blog for Women, by Women. Start your own conversation. “This is defamatory, you should be in jail” Sue us".
/r/MensRights20/10/17 10:58 PM
1

Any movement takes time to start. I imagine that first wave feminism was met with ridicule and shut down regularly. I imagine that the black rights movement was the same too. It's ironic that the men's right movement (IMO) is emerging more strongly as a subsequent by-product of the feminist movement. It will take time to establish and come to the fore as well. Hang in there bud.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 10:46 PM
0

Gets drunk, presumably blacks out, cheats on boyfriend/or is taken advantage of, claims rape as defence for actions. As an aside, don't sleep with people who are sloppy drunk. Don't sleep with people when you are sloppy drunk. Too much room for accusations or regret to follow.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 10:28 PM
1

2/2 There is one personal example I read that I found to be particularly ironic though. "What makes it worse is even though my husband is only five months older than me, because of the threshold I will work for a year longer than him". This particular quote from the article struck me as hypocritical in the extreme. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/pensions/8421127/I-accepted-the-1995-Pensions-Act-but-this-is-unfair.html The following is likely the most critically balanced of ev…
/r/MensRights19/10/17 07:40 AM
2

1/2 Absolutely: the question is about fairness. Downturns in the economy and other factors affect both sexes. The main difference is that the timetable of change and increased speed of implementation affects this group more unfairly than their male counterparts. Changes to pension age from 60-65 for women was announced first in 1995 to take effect over a twenty year period. Fair, just, no justifiable reason to complain. In 2011 the age was changed to 66 for both sexes and the timetable of change…
/r/MensRights19/10/17 07:31 AM
4

I did a fundraising module at uni and we covered a lot of literature about this sort of stuff. The research I followed often highlighted other factors for folks participating in stuff like charity runs. Arguably mindless factors such as socialising, personal fitness (valuable for the participant), fun activity (mud and paint runs), peer recognition. I'd add other factors such as Instagram fodder and fake altruism to that too. Fundraising for charity was alarmingly far down the list. Cynically sp…
/r/MensRights18/10/17 03:57 PM
9

In the unisex toilet at my doctors there is a poster with info about prostate cancer. Also, randomly, there is also one for domestic violence/forced marriage (marketed with females in mind) with one of those flip deck contact info/business card things attached to it. Considering each poster comes with hundreds of removable info things I always shudder a little when I see them go empty. Seems they replace them fairly regularly too.
/r/MensRights18/10/17 03:45 PM
2

... yet
/r/MensRights18/10/17 03:41 PM
5

Movember is a good example of that changing https://uk.movember.com/#home I was reading the reply comments below about it having less traction than breast cancer awareness month but would argue that is due to it being relatively young in comparison. It also hasn't had the corporate third sector marketing treatment as of yet either like BCAM has. My suggestion is for folks to lobby their local/national cancer charities to ask what resources/marketing they are providing to men's cancer awareness. …
/r/MensRights18/10/17 03:15 PM
2

A couple years ago my opinion was that the changes were fair and that those who complained were out of line. I read into it a fair amount and realised that it really is affecting, albeit, a relatively small group of women quite dramatically. I sense also that because the changes affect the state pension age (and access to the state pension) that the folks who are really worst off are those relying mostly/solely on their state pension or who have had other factors like unemployment issues in late…
/r/MensRights18/10/17 11:37 AM
1

I believe that it is also true boys/men are more likely to stay quiet about abuse/rape that they have endured out of a sense of shame/fear of not being believed and therefore don't receive appropriate help and support. That is a matter that should also be given priority in being addressed. Also, reporting of physical abuse of males by females and subsequent arrests continue to increase in countries such as the UK and US. "Unlike male domestic violence offenders, female domestic violence offender…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 09:07 PM
1

Indeed! Her YouTube videos are excellent to watch!!
/r/MensRights17/10/17 04:27 PM
1

Thanks for the heads up. I'm gonna go source some more info out of curiosity.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 04:26 PM
3

This article reads a little too fake to sound real. Does anyone have further verification?
/r/MensRights17/10/17 03:24 PM
2

Not gonna lie, I read this quote imagining it in the voice of this lady: https://youtu.be/XHrvNYUTTpw
/r/MensRights17/10/17 03:12 PM
3

It's a sensible cause for any UK party to lend their name to if they wish to gain votes away from the Conservatives who are traditionally favoured by Brits age 50+. I agree with u/nforne who points out that the issue is not about equalising the pension age but instead about the timetable being sped up with more than one change since 2011 leading to serious consequences for some. Here's a couple articles that I pulled from 2011 that ought to give some overview of sentiment/info if you are interes…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 03:00 PM
1

The title of the OP is technically misleading when it says that feminists are calling for a lowering of the pension age seeing as the article is about the Labour Party tabling an issue for parliamentary debate about creating a smoother transition into equal pension age. Also, the WASPIs aren't calling for the pension age to be lowered (again, misleading title), instead they are arguing against aspects of discrimination that they perceive in a sped up timetable of implementation since 2011 that h…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 02:25 PM
1

Yep, that was an EU legislation that cited discrimination as a factor, wasn't it? I believe the reasoning prior was that shorter life expectancy factored in an annual higher state pension but I would happily be corrected or provided with extra info if available.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 01:48 PM
2

That is a logical and valid example to give. The point of state pension age equality will be true as of 2020 when the balance of status and rights become equal in this respect for both sexes. The issue of opportunity to prepare for retirement is currently skewed for some given the sped up timetable of changes/other factors.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 01:10 PM
2

The state pension age is being raised for both sexes in the UK to 67 by c.2040. It has been timetabled to raise from 60-65 since 1995 for women but that process has sped up since 2011 when the age of retirement was raised for both sexes to 66 (as of 2020). It's likely going to raise to 68 at some point just cos. The country would likely bankrupt itself if anything were lowered so the only way is up for everyone.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 04:16 AM
1

Indeed. I can't wrap my head round how the woman is trying to describe breast feeding as not natural and how "finally!" it's ok for men to start feeding their children.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 02:29 AM
2

Not quite. They are waiting extra time on top of what they had planned and saved for which is where the crux of the issue currently lies for a number of people. New changes that moved along a faster timeline were brought into law in 2011 and some females born in the 1950s were given minimum notice of change. E.g. some females were given one year's notice of a change of up to six years. In some cases this hasn't been an issue (just work an extra couple of years, no big deal). In other cases it ha…
/r/MensRights17/10/17 02:20 AM
2

Yep, it's like logic just totally evades the reality of that first statement. A couple folks have suggested to me to ignore everything that come before the word BUT. "Male experiences are valid but..."
/r/MensRights16/10/17 10:46 PM
2

I really hoped that it was a simple oversight on the part of the original twitter post. Otherwise I assumed that it was put there in direct response to the Harvey Weinstein accusations (which haven't included male victims as of yet). Another part of me wondered if the gender specific "if all the women" would be pounced on by gender identity feminists but then the cynical part of my brain thought not. Perhaps proponents of dismantling gender identity don't pounce when the topic is about evils don…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 04:58 PM
6

UK based here: I think that the issue itself can be more complex in practice. There are two women I know of who faced more than one redundancy after the 2008 crash and were both unable to find a final job before their pensions kicked into force. Both had their pension ages moved in that time frame so they were unemployed (one was married, the other wasn't) and waiting extra time for the pensions they had paid into to become available/supplement other financial resources. Another example was a fr…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 04:27 PM
1

Out of sheer curiosity are you talking about the very original twitter post or about someone in your personal network?
/r/MensRights16/10/17 03:25 PM
6

Exactly! I was so frustrated when I saw the original text and realised it was specific to women. Here are some comments that have irritated me today through my own FB account (edit: they are from female users): (Tl:dr not as many men as women have been harassed. Don't draw the attention away from this issue by speaking about men). "I'm not sure most men have been sexually harassed or assaulted. Certainly when I speak plainly about the kind of thing I'm used to dealing with many of the men I know…
/r/MensRights16/10/17 03:16 PM
2

This is the other side of the "patriarchy" that I sense feminists regularly ignore.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 11:39 AM
1

Word!!
/r/MensRights16/10/17 09:03 AM
1

There was a guy who I went to uni with who only ever work a black shirt and black suit trousers. Every day for 5 years.
/r/MensRights16/10/17 09:01 AM
2

Nah, that would involve thinking more critically.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 08:41 PM
30

I think that the thing I notice is that female outfits tend to be so obviously unique (a bright blue or red suit, a brightly patterned dress, leopard print shoes, a sequinned slip) whereas male outfits (particularly smart ones) tend to be based around a dark base such as a grey suit worn with a multitude of different shirts. I'm thinking of smart outfits or people in the media when I say this. For example, I'm thinking of our current UK prime minister (female) who wears bright outfits that are s…
/r/MensRights15/10/17 08:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter