TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

corezon Archive

View 3 posts and 66 comments by corezon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

It's usually the people that like to use hate speech that make this oversimplification as well. Almost like they want to camoflage the fact that they're shitty people under the banner of legal protection.
/r/MensRights22/03/19 09:52 PM
4

I'm a lefty and no, this is not a "lefty" thing. I think that the term "cis" is pretty stupid. I understand it's origin among trans people as a way to identify someone who is of a sex and was born of that sex but yeah, using it in the way that OP describes is really idiotic. Edit: clarified context.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 11:40 AM
0

I'm done debating you fuckwits on this. I have literally made my point as plainly as I can. You're free to make your argument using fascist iconography. Just don't be surprised when people dismiss your argument out of hand because of the name you've chosen for the sub.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 08:14 PM
-1

Yes fuckface, I have always understood the argument that was being made. The point I am making, which seems to have evaded entry into your simple head, is that branding matters. I agree with the argument. The branding sucks and will make people disagree with it simply on merit.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 06:58 PM
-9

I'm sure you've heard of Godwin's law at this point. So maybe, starting your argument off by naming it after the autobiography of one of the largest mass murderers in history isn't a great fucking idea.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 05:52 PM
-24

Yeah, I do get what they're going for. But what's the fucking point if no one is going to read it? Moron. edit: Naming your sub that way makes you looks stupid at best and it turns people away from the notion. At worst, it makes you look like you're trying to use something Hitler did as a force for change and that never goes well.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 05:13 PM
-29

Using the title of Hitler's autobiography, even as a play on words, will only turn people away from the sub. JFC. What poor taste.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 04:42 PM
-24

Your statement is patently false. Two people may have the same qualifications and apply for the same job.
/r/MensRights23/02/19 05:29 AM
3

Jesus. I'm glad I'm gay.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 06:54 PM
-8

Same for most Trump supporters.
/r/MensRights15/02/19 11:49 PM
32

This made my head hurt to read.
/r/MensRights31/01/19 04:28 PM
0

Clear your notifications please.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 10:49 PM
33

Not in this instance.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 04:14 PM
50

A parent may consent for their child until they are of legal age.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 03:43 PM
1

LOL. I'm a gay man, so no. I most definitely do not pander to vagina. Quite the opposite. But Kavanaugh was not believable during his questioning. And now that he's been appointed, it means that Trump will skate free of any jail time his crimes might have brought.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 10:29 PM
-1

Btw, my sister suffered a similar assault about the same time Ford supposedly did. She did called the cops and there was a prosecution. She says that Ford is full of horseshit. So there you have it. Yes, because every rape that happens is exactly the same and the victims suffer trauma in identical ways. LOL. Please. I am not saying that we should accept every accusation without evidence. I am saying that given the testimony of both parties, hers came across as far more credible. I am sorry for w…
/r/MensRights05/11/18 02:15 AM
1

Exactly. It's like u/jeegte12 hasn't realized that the game is rigged yet.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 11:39 PM
1

Gay men do not need women. Nor have we "given up."
/r/MensRights04/11/18 11:33 PM
-2

I hate to break it to you, but Kavanaugh was as innocent as OJ Simpson was. I agree that women should absolutely be called out when they do lie. I do not think that that Kavanaugh's accuser was lying in any capacity though.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 11:31 PM
3

Jesus. What a cuck. You forgive her for ruining your friendships and reputation? You forgive her for refusing to admit that she lied? Grow some balls. You're entitled to be angry about that.
/r/MensRights19/10/18 12:57 AM
-1

Look at the odd gap between "with" and "Malala". Looks like it's been photoshopped...
/r/MensRights08/09/18 03:12 AM
8

It's amazing how these men find time outside of their 80 hour work weeks to conceive children. Perhaps she should get her fucking priorities straight?
/r/MensRights04/09/18 07:14 PM
1

Why did I read this in David Attenborough's voice?
/r/MensRights30/08/18 09:44 AM
1

I never mentioned anything about evading FBI surveillance? But you go on and have fun.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 10:12 PM
80

That sentence is so hard to read.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 03:44 PM
1

You're being disingenuous to the original question. You're assuming that morals of the people should bend to what is good for the state. That's not how morality works. Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 02:16 PM
1

And that precludes you from answering the question?
/r/MensRights29/08/18 01:55 PM
1

So what would it take for you to admit that Trump is in the wrong? Because I am willing to bet that he could put on a KKK robe and burn a black man on the White house lawn and you would still find a way to twist your morals into acceptance.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 01:14 PM
1

Uhhh... If compromising classified communication is really so important to you then yes, your boy is also guilty. But the thing that really gets me is that you all assume that I personally would want Hillary out of office if she was as big a fuck up as Trump is. Yes, I would. You see, you all are so desperate to grab onto anything you can just to avoid taking the blame for electing him that you're playing twister with your morals. Trump puts kids in cages? Integrity green! Trump is using the off…
/r/MensRights29/08/18 12:52 PM
1

That's funny as you don't sound like you dislike Trump...
/r/MensRights29/08/18 12:02 AM
1

I wish people would stop downvoting you. While I may not agree with your stances I do appreciate the conversation and your willingness to have a reasoned talk. Your stance regarding the children seems really circumspect. You don't want to put kids in prison but it's okay to do so when Trump does it? How about putting them in foster homes? How about literally any other living situation with a roof over their heads and a bed to sleep on that doesn't involve chain link fence cages and tin foil for …
/r/MensRights28/08/18 11:44 PM
2

Trump has already admitted to collusion and obstruction on Twitter and vis his lawyers.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 11:36 PM
9

Trump specifically requested Russia to hack the DNC and release all of their emails, it still absolutely opened my eyes to how shitty and biased the DNC was, so hell, I'm appreciative if that's the case! While I understand that you are taking an "ends justify the means" approach here (and I understand and agree with that stance in some circumstances), I disagree in this case. I think that when you're dealing with Russia it is far more important to consider what they're getting out of the deal. R…
/r/MensRights28/08/18 09:08 PM
7

I appreciate your response. Really. It's very hard to find people who are willing to discuss this. Let me ask a follow up question to your response. If a president has admitted to breaking the law, which Trump has done on Twitter and via his lawyer(s). And if a president has given orders that lead to children being taken from their parents... ...does that not justify his removal from office? Regardless of what you feel about liberals, do you really believe that Trump (the man) has acquitted hims…
/r/MensRights28/08/18 07:48 PM
7

Thank you for sharing. Setting aside the social mores that he's broken, what do you think about the actual crimes he's been accused (and subsequently admitted to on Twitter or through Giulliani)? Has that changed your view of him since you stopped viewing things with a social lens?
/r/MensRights28/08/18 06:33 PM
10

I'm sorry... But are you really trying to yell "BUT HER EMAILS!?!?!?" to avoid facing the truth that the Republican party elected the most corrupt president since Nixon?
/r/MensRights28/08/18 06:18 PM
9

I am genuinely curious to know what you felt redeemed Trump?
/r/MensRights28/08/18 05:56 PM
5

So she hates Trump more now? Or less? Your post is unclear. I'm on the side that he deserves all the hate he gets. Because while he isn't evil per se, he is really stupid. Collusion with foreign agents, regardless of whether or not the colluder realized what he was doing was wrong (and there's a lot of evidence to suggest he did know it was wrong) is still treason.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 05:31 PM
1

Yes, because taking my words at their face value does so much to prove your point. You're being intentionally obtuse at this point. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 11:11 PM
0

For all the good that MLK did, his methods and arguments worked for their time and place. We no longer live in that society and our methodology must also evolve to suit the time and place that we live in. Reasonable voices are no longer heard as they are drowned out by the shouting idiots. It's time to change.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:06 PM
2

And that attitude, right there, is why we keep losing our rights to the feminists.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:48 PM
1

I am a woman, I am a feminist. Even worse. Now you've made it clear that your only goal in this argument was to simply argue. You were always going to come back with the equivalent of "no u". So my original retort stands. Kindly, fuck off... cunt.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:14 PM
3

You seem to be under the mistaken impression that taking the high ground wins arguments.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:11 PM
1

Okay, let me simplify it for you: The sources are easily found on Google. Stop white knighting and shutting down arguments with shit retorts like "cite your sources" when you clearly haven't done your homework.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 08:25 PM
3

Really? Because as you mention, it's the exact same shit feminists do. They seem to be winning. Now here we have u/j-dawg-94 being a lazy dumb ass and trying to shut down what is one of the best retorts I've ever seen to a white knight and/or tumblrina (tumblrino? I don't know if it needs a feminine/masculine denotation) by simply yelling "cite your source!" No. Google is a public website. The fuckwit needs to learn to do his own research. It wasn't even difficult. Rather than sit down and pose …
/r/MensRights22/08/18 08:23 PM
8

Keep avoiding the point. It's clearly working for you.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 06:31 PM
22

And I'd love for you to do your own homework instead of dismissing viable counterarguments with the laziest of retorts. Looks like we're both going to be disappointed, just like your parents.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 05:38 PM
14

That's cute. I found sources for more than a few of them with a quick Google search. You can fuck right off.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 04:48 PM
-3

It's photoshopped.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 02:27 PM
-16

That's about the only thing he does right.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 04:00 PM
3

Yeah. This one "accidentally" got pregnant 3 times in quick succession.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 08:37 PM
40

I've lost so many good friends to marriage over the years. It's especially frustrating when you can already see that they're unhappy and that the woman they're marrying is a soul-sucking vampire.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 10:45 AM
-7

No. It's called a repost when it's already been posted to a particular sub. This has been posted here quite recently.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 06:49 PM
-10

Repost.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 06:37 PM
2

No, you're right. But high school is typically ages 14-18 where many of us are becoming men. I get that kids don't know how to properly communicate but I'll be damned if it didn't hurt being an outsider at that age.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 03:50 PM
6

That's not always true. I witnessed some real cruelty between guys in high school when an acquaintance came out. I was still in the closet at the time but even I had to stand up for him. Guys are just as capable of being dicks tonone another as women are capable of being bitches to each other. There's no gender difference there, sadly.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 03:35 PM
52

Women friends are the meanest to each other though.
/r/MensRights22/03/18 02:50 PM
6

If you ask me, they're doing the men a favor here.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 04:00 AM
-7

Honestly, /r/the_donald subscribers can go jump in a lake. After the way you sold this country out on Nov. 8, having your speech censored on Reddit is a small price to pay.
/r/MensRights17/12/16 05:12 PM
15

Because articles that openly display the hypocrisy of third wave feminists have a way of disappearing unless properly archived.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 03:30 AM
19

#HashtagsDontWorkOnReddit
/r/MensRights15/05/16 05:29 PM
0

Well at least one third of your username seems accurate.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 04:05 AM
-5

Am I missing anything else logically inconsistent in the argument? You're definitely missing the difference between "government" and "jury of your peers." Maybe actually read a thing before making a snap response?
/r/MensRights20/02/16 06:15 PM
3

Thank you for being the voice of reason in this thread.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 06:12 PM
2

Didn't realize that so thanks for letting me know. Had I known, I wouldn't have posted it.
/r/MensRights13/12/15 08:32 PM
4

You're over thinking it. Do not become the thing that you oppose.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 03:01 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter