TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

corycorycory09 Archive

View 0 posts and 52 comments by corycorycory09 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

If any partner, man or woman, expects the other partner to stay home and raise the kids, then I’d say that person should be owed some fair amount of compensation. Ideally that amount should just be agreed on beforehand. However I would never want to be with a SAH partner. I’d much rather split the cost of childcare and have two incomes.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 06:54 PM
–

Sure and women tend to take on more of those responsibilities because they tend to either work less and or earn less meaning their partners career takes priority. I would LOVE to be a SAH father, but the number of women why would even consider taking on a “provider” role is approaching zero. Most women expect their male partner to earn more than them. I genuinely think there are a lot of men out there who would love to stay at home and care for their kids while their spouse works and pays the bi…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 04:29 PM
–

It’s literally happening / already happened in Ukraine. I agree it’s highly unlikely to happen anytime soon in the US, but it’s still clearly a serious issue affecting men globally.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 04:15 PM
–

It blows my mind that anyone would choose to bring kids into this world and NOT want to spend time with them…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/24 04:12 PM
–

How is it a shit deal? It’s basically the same deal as a person making the same as you…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 11:10 PM
–

Why? If they make more but operate in your budget, then how is it any different than dating someone who makes the same? Is it just jealousy that they have more money?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 11:08 PM
–

Maybe not equal, but related. It’s not uncommon for men to have less experience with household cleaning tasks, and therefore to be less efficient at doing them. Likewise it’s not uncommon for women to have less experience doing things like mowing the lawn or changing motor oil etc. Yeah, his example of 1 hour to do a dish is obviously hyperbole. But at the end of the day, the dishes need done and if it takes me longer to do them, I’m still going to get them done. Likewise, at the end of the day,…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 04:43 PM
–

Why not apply that same logic to income? If it takes you 10 hours to earn $200, and it takes me 1 hour, is that weaponized incompetence as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 04:36 PM
–

In your scenario, does you husband expect you to subsidize his expenses because you earn more? In that case, absolutely he should be helping more around the house. If he’s fine living off his income and you live off yours, then equal chores is fair. Or if the higher earner pushes for the more expensive housing/groceries/vacations etc, then yes they should be the one to cover it. But if person A is making 100k and B is making 50k, if person A is willing to live within B’s budget/means so they can…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/24 04:27 PM
-1

Many women are also self sufficient when it comes to the finances but once they start dating or get married the man ends up taking on most of the financial responsibilities
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/24 12:16 AM
7

Arm candy is being generous here
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/23 04:51 PM
–

Is it really an accusation though? Or just wanting an assurance. It’s common advice for women to have a secret emergency fund in case their partner becomes abusive. Would you say any women who has such a fund is accusing their partner of being abusive? Or would you say it’s just a piece of mind and for their protection?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 05:28 PM
–

Another alternative is buy your own house. But if rent is below market rent this might be a good deal
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/23 03:21 AM
–

Explain to me how the earth will be better off with more people than with fewer. You say “the economy” but by most economic metrics, this generation appears to be worse off than generations prior. Higher cost of living, lower relative wages, and larger wage disparity between classes. The “economic” benefit from population growth has been almost entirely captured by a small small segment of the population.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/23 01:19 AM
–

People with children also put more carbon into the atmosphere. We will be just fine with fewer people on earth.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/23 12:15 AM
–

Why do population rates need to go up? Given we are in a climate crisis, it seems a decreasing population growth rate is a good thing to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/23 12:12 AM
–

A salary from who? They should have spending money, sure. How much is up for negotiation with their partner. They shouldn’t get income from the government, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/23 12:10 AM
2

You’re really coming off as very sexist. Hopefully your partner is aware you believe this shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/23 05:15 PM
1

Did you teleport through time or something? You’re a woman living in 2023 with equal rights to men. Of course you should pull your own weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/23 05:14 PM
7

50/50, budget set by the lower earner.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/23 05:56 PM
2

This reads like you are saying the man has the first choice of financial abortion and then the woman gets to chose. That's what "leaving the woman to decide" implies. What if the woman decides she doesn't want to abort the child but she also doesn't want to raise or support the child before the father decides to financially abort the child? As I've said, the decision for financial abortion should have to be made with enough time for the woman to get an abortion if she desires. Therefore the deci…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 09:30 PM
2

Both sides are cruel to financial abort a child. I disagree there. Financial abortion occurs before there is a child. Essentially they are financially aborting a *fetus*. It only becomes a child because one party unilaterally decides to make it so. OP is about absolving men of any responsibility of the child after birth I can't speak for OP, but I would only favor financial abortions pre-birth (while abortion is still a viable option). So yes, they are absolved of responsibility IF THEY CHOOSE l…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 08:23 PM
2

So a woman isn’t choosing to bring a child into the world without a parent because it’s not her responsibility that the father decided to financially abort. She's still choosing to bring a child into the world KNOWING it will be abandoned. Yes, both parents are 'at fault 'for the fact that the hypothetical child COULD have no parents, but only ONE parent is at fault for actually choosing to bring that baby into the world. As you said, a man has no say on what a woman does with her body. That cho…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 07:23 PM
2

I never said it's cruel for either parent to financially abort. What is cruel IMO would be financially aborting and THEN choosing to bring the child into the world anyways knowing it will have no parents. It's the two actions together that make it cruel. IMO if you don't want to raise the child then that's fine and dandy, but you shouldn't choose to bring it into the world then just to abandon it. A comparison I guess would be if a man pressured his parter to carry the child to term after gettin…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 07:03 PM
3

IMO the financial abortion should have to happen by any parent in the early stages of the pregnancy (while actual abortion is still viable/legal). I would hope there aren't too many woman who choose to financially abort AND proceed to carry the baby to term, only to abandon it with no parents? Seems pretty cruel. But in those instances, I would say the safe haven or adoption is the best option.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 06:46 PM
3

Huh? Your original comment was "Can women have financial abortions and force the dad to raise the child alone with no financial support from the mother?" It's a false dichotomy because men cant force women to raise the child alone, just as women can't force men. OP didn't even suggest that men force women to raise the children. So yes, women should be allowed to have financial abortions. No they shouldn't be able to force the dad to raise the child.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 06:32 PM
6

Your question was "Can women have financial abortions and force the dad to raise the child alone with no financial support from the mother?". Men can't force a woman to do that. No partner can force the other to raise a child. A woman has to choose to carry a fetus to term. They also have to choose to keep it, rather than put it up for adoption or safe-haven. Nothing is being forced on them. But let's say this is adopted as a policy for both parents, and the mother chooses for whatever reason to…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 06:13 PM
–

Because men don't have the choice to terminate the pregnancy.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 05:03 PM
1

I don't care about a woman being a provider. I can provide for myself. I could also easily provide for a woman but having somone dependant on you is such an unattractive trait imo. I wouldn't date somone who can't support themselves financially.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 09:40 PM
1

Would depend on the state, but IMO they should. If you sign the prenup you know what the terms are. No reason the court should overturn that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 04:31 PM
4

The entire first paragraph. Even in your example, if person A brought 500k into the marriage, and person B brought 0, and that 500k in investments grew to 600k... person A should leave with the entire 100k in appreciation. It is solely a result of the contribution made by A. B played no part in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 02:30 AM
2

A prenup has to do with whatever you put into the prenup. So, yes it absolutely can waive alimony in many places. Child support obligations generally cannot be waived with a prenuo though
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 02:08 AM
1

Alimony can be waived in many states with a prenup
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 02:03 AM
6

The issue with that, is if person a contributes $1m during marriage and person B contributed $0, it shouldnt be be split 50/50. Imo everything should be split proportionally to contributions. And yes, childcare is a contribution.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 01:52 AM
3

It is relevant. Men don’t take on any of the physical/burdens risks associated with pregnancy That isn't entirely true. This thread is about the risks of having sex, not the risks of being pregnant. The risks of having sex for a woman extend to pregnancy to an extent. As in, a woman risks getting pregnant, and risks the side effects from taking plan B or having an abortion if the pregnancy was detected past the point where plan B was an option. Beyond that, it's no longer a risk of having sex, b…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/21 01:41 AM
3

I mean I agree men could do more to support research into alternative birth control methods. But thats not really relevant to the original point of "who risks more" when a man and a woman have sex in society as it exists today.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 11:39 PM
4

Where did I say cis men were physically impacted by pregnancy? Thats a strawman. I can guarantee you many men would happily take a plan b pill over paying 18 years of child support if they were given the option.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 11:25 PM
3

Why would any man want to put in effort towards somone who uses a term like scrotes to refer to men? Would you put in effort on a guy that calls women cunts?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 11:19 PM
-1

Lmao. The word sex is indecent? Are you 12?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 02:24 PM
2

Not really. Womem have a plethora of options after sex to deal with an unexpected pregnancy. Men have no such options.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 02:18 PM
1

Why are you censoring the word sex? 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 02:15 PM
24

If you don't enjoy sex, don't have it. If you're having sex with people who don't get you off, choose better partners. And STDs, sexual assault, etc are not exclusive risks to women. Pregnancy is a bigger risk for men if anything, than women, because a woman has the option to abortion or plan B, whereas the man has no say.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/21 02:13 PM
3

You do whatever you want. You beliefs just aren't egalitarian.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/21 04:29 PM
3

Well sure, you are welcome to use whatever criteria you want. Just don't pretend your egalitarian when you believe in double standards. Same with men who sleep around but then whine about girls who have done the same. They aren't egalitarian.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/21 03:24 PM
5

OK, but then you aren't egalitarian when it comes to dating. You expect a guy to prove he is generous and make an investment, but don't hold yourself to the same standard. Your ex has nothing to do a random other guy you've just met. That you presume that any guy who wants to split on the first date is a psycho or treat it as a red flag is actually very telling.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/21 03:18 PM
0

Ok thats fair. I interpreted your original comment was that you expected him to pay for the first few dates because he was the man, not because you were struggling financially.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/21 03:09 PM
-1

Did you do those things because you're a woman or because you care about him?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/21 03:02 PM
6

I didn't expect my man to pay for the majority of the relationship, just the first couple of dates. So, not egalitarian then...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/21 02:05 PM
0

A man wants a woman who works full time and does a majority of the housework. I hear this a lot but it seems like such a solvable issue. Like if you both work full time, surely affording a cleaning service would not be that difficult. I personally have zero problems splitting housework 50/50 (either by doing it personally or hiring someone) so long as my partner splits bills 50/50.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/21 02:03 PM
1

What kind of lying? Like if a girl has a blemish on her face and covers it with makeup, is that considered lying? If I guy brags up his job like hes a hotshot, when in reality hes a coffee grabber, is that lying?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/19 10:49 PM
1

Western women are doing the same jobs western men are doing. Is that why men make up 93% of workplace fatalities?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/19 03:27 AM
3

Not saying I dont believe you, but can you source the 80% claim?
/r/PussyPass27/12/17 05:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter