TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

couldbeglorious Archive

View 0 posts and 47 comments by couldbeglorious on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

+1 unsubbing
/r/MensRights24/03/15 05:29 AM
-1

I have to go looking down here in the buried comments for the first comment to not be an overreaction. You're totally correct.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 05:27 AM
1

It seems like the person commenting is part of the Guardian's technical staff, not editorial. But yes, the comment is ridiculous. The replies reinject a little sanity.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 10:15 AM
2

->"clutters up the page with crap" ->replies with bold text Really? I didn't realise it's my job to decide whether someone's a spammer every time I reply to a post.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 02:16 AM
-3

Are you serious? Why does this guy think he's entitled to a debate? Get this retarded "redpill" bullshit out of here.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 06:38 AM
8

Well purple ends up looking like a complete asshole, so I guess you win?
/r/MensRights16/01/15 02:59 AM
1

...and this is from season 21. So you're agreeing with the top level comment.
/r/MensRights11/01/15 08:08 AM
3

http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/JumpingTheShark
/r/MensRights10/01/15 03:02 PM
1

They isn't exclusively the plural form. i.e. you're talking complete shit.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 10:00 AM
14

This. While the wage gap is mostly a myth, in the UK it's still rational for a business owner to hire a man in place of a woman because a woman has more right and likelihood of taking time off for babies. Something like this, would seriously add to that. Maybe there is a secret patriarchy, and this is the kind of thing they're conspiring to put through.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 03:01 PM
-15

I think you mean hatechan.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 02:50 PM
3

Walk around the streets of most EU capitals, you can find nude-covered magazines on street newsagent stands.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 04:19 PM
2

I guess the insinuation was that the third world is so male-dominated that a woman hitting on a man would be somewhat less likely?
/r/seduction18/11/12 02:36 AM
31

I bought that ebook. Pretty awesome. It was all true, and it really worked. Ultimately, though, I didn't want a book about cultivating bonsai trees.
/r/seduction18/11/12 02:02 AM
9

New York Times?
/r/seduction07/11/12 10:43 PM
2

Yeah, just like how god would be reflecting all that food on those starving to death on the planet, the only obstacle is their understanding it! Genius...
/r/seduction31/10/12 09:05 PM
0

Of course, the only reason to downvote such an obviously-not-trolling post is that we're all disfigured midgets. Troll bait, kinda tasty but not very filling. Let's pretend you're not trolling, though. Why would you think that? Did some ugly, nerdy, 5'6" devil seduce your mother and now you're lashing out?
/r/seduction15/08/12 12:00 AM
1

Is it like this to be in any social situation? How is it if you're just hanging around in a group you're familiar with? If it's better I'm going to suggest doing some sort of sociable hobby/interest type groups - anything you like particularly? Cooking classes, language, sport, karate whatever - you'll be able to meet people who have at least one thing in common with you.
/r/seduction10/06/12 09:23 PM
6

As much of a cunt he sounds like he is, I agree. It's not all his fault, and he could have rationalized it that way, but getting someone who's recovering from addiction a coke hookup is a massive cunt move.
/r/MensRights16/04/12 09:17 AM
5

and more frequently, problem makers.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 05:46 PM
7

Not expressing my personal opinion, but I'd expect that people see something self-inflicted as less attention-worthy than something one person does to another.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 05:32 PM
1

Maybe not boyfriend, since that's pretty forward but to some it may not be obvious you're joking. I think husband would work better?
/r/seduction11/03/12 12:50 AM
6

DOUBLE PUN
/r/seduction19/02/12 09:41 PM
-3

It's an article. Saying nothing about my opinion of the content, the provenance is irrelevant to that fact that that word is appropriate. The blog may not be a well-respected or authoritative publication, but the post is an article whether you like it or not. With that said, your calling everyone 'fucktards' only makes you appear more ignorant. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/article
/r/seduction12/02/12 09:09 AM
1

But flying creatures don't have flanks!
/r/seduction10/02/12 11:16 AM
7

If anyone actually said it to me I'd just be like 'Apart from the male soldiers. You know, the ones who die?'
/r/MensRights08/02/12 07:47 AM
2

I don't think sending the FB request means that she's your #1 priority.
/r/seduction20/01/12 07:48 AM
2

Absolutely. He didn't say it was ethical, either. He said it's 'natural', a word I hate to use because people assume it means 'good'.
/r/MensRights02/12/11 05:20 PM
12

Any downvoters here will have never read any of the following books: The Selfish Gene - Richard Dawkins The Red Queen - Matt Ridley Sperm Wars - Robin Baker The Lucifer Principle - Howard Bloom If you want to downvote - please engage in debate - I love this subject and will argue in favour of the first two sentences.
/r/MensRights01/12/11 08:32 AM
2

I think it's retarded that a child doesn't have the right to decline it, or that it can even be allowed. It has no proven medical benefit - and I'd even say all the alleged benefits, even if all true, are outweighed by the constant downsides and risk of surgical complications/failure.
/r/MensRights21/11/11 06:53 PM
1

Love the butler idea. I wouldn't be able to do that because I'm not very good at holding back laughter.
/r/seduction03/11/11 01:49 PM
2

I love the idea, but I'm pretty sure they'd expect some sort of demonstration of wealth before you could convince them. They're probably aware of people fabricating or, more likely, exaggerating their level of wealth for the sake of getting sex out of it. I don't think you'd be able to say 'Hey, well I'll be near your town over the weekend, let's meet up at X hotel and see if we're 'compatible' ;)' That said... it might work. There was this guy who was homeless turning up at millionaire's partie…
/r/seduction02/11/11 03:42 PM
2

Though, of course, things which are literally impossible, like conjuring a bacon sandwich from thin air, will also be impossible in your mind first, and so it's not worth the effort of trying. [/missingthepoint]
/r/seduction26/10/11 10:03 AM
2

I totally agree. I think that, to remain an introvert while having successful game, there has to be some degree of 'selective extroversion'. So be introvert most of the time, but just switch up into extrovert mode when the situation calls for it.
/r/seduction21/10/11 05:30 AM
1

Don't forget the context of the original joke. We're talking about her boobs as a tool to get served quicker. So I think returning to that is the simplest thing to do. So she says 'Nah, my boobs aren't big enough.", you say 'I'm sure he'd notice. Thinking about it, don't do that, you'd probably distract him for so long that we'd never get served.' I think that's a fairly neutral way of playing it given what's already been said. Though I agree, not as exciting or witty as what others are suggesti…
/r/seduction21/10/11 04:44 AM
17

I'd emphasise that ownership of a flying carpet is a massive DHV.
/r/seduction21/10/11 04:27 AM
-1

...implying that quote marks are for witty statements, and aren't simply a way of avoiding confusion by denoting that the quoted remark was something to be said, not something I was actually saying. Way to contribute to the conversation. Also, pick a tense and stick to it.
/r/seduction21/10/11 04:21 AM
1

"Do you think that if I told her you said that, she'd find it endearing or creepy as fuck? I'll take 'Fucking Creepy' for $500, Alex."
/r/seduction19/10/11 07:43 PM
2

The former can help project the latter. Or project the illusion of it.
/r/seduction14/08/11 10:37 AM
4

The perfect response to 'are you gay' in any form is anything along the lines of "Sorry, no, but I hear there's a gay bar a five minute walk from here if you're looking for company."
/r/seduction14/08/11 09:20 AM
1

heh, throughout the UK 'tannoy' is slang for a PA system
/r/seduction06/08/11 03:03 AM
1

"Is he always this loud? Maybe he has a past life as a foghorn." "Hey, buddy, what do you do for a living, work as a tannoy?" Those lines are terrible. that Personally I'd just do something funny which draws all the attention, like move my face closer and closer to his until he stopped talking, and when he's quiet announce that my plan has worked, the terrible loud voice has stopped.
/r/seduction06/08/11 02:03 AM
5

Fuck. That. Sacrificing things you enjoy for the sake of having a slightly easier time with women... fuck that. If you talk positively and passionately about your hobbies and are a confident about it, then a woman will generally be attracted to it. Remember that she's into YOU and not your hobbies. Now there's a point to make here I feel I'm missing if I don't mention it: Some hobbies are self-improvement. Some aren't. Fitness can be a hobby, but it's also self-improving. Video games tend not to…
/r/seduction06/08/11 01:56 AM
2

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fd/World-cannabis-laws.png
/r/seduction06/08/11 01:47 AM
1

Not much of a rant. I guess you anticipated the downvotes?
/r/MensRights06/08/11 01:19 AM
-4

My first instinct in reading the headline was - is she hot? Is that bad?
/r/MensRights04/08/11 02:12 PM
4

Really don't think he is. The 'Oh James...' implies he wants to say '...you have so much to learn.' or something. I guess?
/r/seduction03/08/11 12:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter