TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

counter345 Archive

View 0 posts and 18 comments by counter345 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Good for you. But let others have the choice.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 07:23 PM
1

Okay... but surely you'd want the choice anyway? Imagine being unhappy with being cut at such a young age... And yes, there are people who get cut without a say at a young age and wished they weren't
/r/MensRights03/03/20 06:31 PM
2

Great post. Saving for future reference
/r/MensRights03/03/20 06:28 PM
1

that's fine... but understand that just because you are fine, other people might not be. so why force it on newborn babies?
/r/MensRights03/03/20 06:23 PM
15

so hang on... keep in mind that this happened in the manner of a few seconds. it's easy to be captain hindsight and go "oh well he should've done this!" when actually, if you look at how engrossed she is in her phone, sure he would've caught her attention but what's to say she wouldn't have kept walking? It's clear in his body actions how he lets go of her straight away that it was purely a motive to stop her from harm. I don't get how you could interpret anything else from his body movements.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 06:53 PM
4

You can like how you are, and also believe that other people should get a choice! Circumcision isn't harmless; deaths are rare but do happen (blood loss and other complications). More commonly it does cause early trauma for infants.
/r/MensRights10/01/20 06:24 PM
1

are you discarding people who get raped? Or how about when contraception fails? (Yes, condoms can break...) There are plenty of stories of people forced to have their rapist's baby because of a countries' anti abortion laws... which is mega fucked up. A foetus isn't a baby, and there are several factors for this... for one, the physical connection between it and the mother, another is the lack of self-awareness (which does only come past toddler years, but we draw the line at childbirth mainly f…
/r/MensRights10/01/20 06:18 PM
1

This "line" you're talking about is drawn equal when you consider breastfeeding a baby vs public urination. Both, like I said, are nonsexual acts involving sometimes necessary actions. (Lack of public toilets everywhere vs feeding a baby). At the end of the day if you justify one and not the other it shows clear lack of understanding of the basic logic behind both actions
/r/MensRights26/11/19 04:59 PM
36

Not being funny but what classifies as genitals shouldn't be the epidome of your argument, at the end of the day a lady breastfeeding in public isn't sexual more a minor convenience, exactly akin to a male peeing in public. Not sexual but a minor convenience.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 04:51 PM
16

https://www.law.umich.edu/newsandinfo/features/Pages/starr_gender_disparities.aspx Took me two minutes to find via Google
/r/MensRights05/11/19 05:05 PM
23

I mean, ethically you're putting more strain on an already strained world (even in the context of a developed nation/first world country). But it's a joke, i.e. not meant to be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 02:46 PM
1

Fine but at this point you're arguing over specific word definitions, "sexual assault", "rape", whatever it may be it was still wrong and she didn't deserve to get away with it.
/r/MensRights21/06/19 05:18 PM
21

Firstly there's a whole psychology thing about teachers having sexual relations with students (regardless on gender) with the whole authority/power play thing. Think why nurses can't have such relations with their patients. Secondly, reading the article (though it is Daily Mail), giving him alcohol before sex - drunk people cannot consent, and this extends to males, not just females. So, he actually couldn't have consented if he was intoxicated, and the fact she would give him alcohol specifical…
/r/MensRights19/06/19 03:00 PM
7

that'd be simpler if they ALSO advocated for men's rights - like child custody laws etc. i'm not saying men have it worse, and i'm not saying fighting for women's rights anyway is a bad thing, but I think as a western society, women's problems come into the light a lot easier vs men's issues and that's a core part of the problem. Take the funding of breast cancer vs testicular cancer, or homeless shelters for men vs women
/r/MensRights26/12/18 08:02 PM
9

Why would you politicise something like this
/r/MensRights22/07/18 11:47 AM
13

the key difference is a piercing isn't something being chopped off - though the morality of doing a modification like that to a baby is questionable. though there is 'growing' science for foreskin recreation, generally once it's gone, it's gone. and a foreskin has many uses [citation needed]
/r/MensRights07/07/18 03:16 PM
5

You still didn't answer their question though :p
/r/MensRights21/01/18 02:37 PM
3

slightly confused, what exactly is SRS?
/r/MensRights09/01/15 09:00 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter