TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

courteously-curious Archive

View 0 posts and 22 comments by courteously-curious on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Basically, move to one of those states that allow single men to adopt.
/r/MensRights18/10/22 05:08 AM
18

So, even if this has come up before, what do you folks think about the notion that quite a lot of the misogyny that women claim among men is actually projected misandry? As a serious response, I would say that there is evidence that suggests that misogyny and misandry are nearly always intertwined so that it is nearly impossible for a person who is a misogynist to avoid being a misandrist and vice versa. This is why men who despise women tend also to despise any man who fails to conform to their…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/22 02:45 AM
5

That differentiation was pretty much discarded by U.S. academe. Though I like the fact that you use it. It is useful, and I will reconsider my own use of the term "feminism" in any and all venues from now on in light of what you have written.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/22 07:59 AM
0

They are women's rights advocates. Feminism as we know it come from 1892 from the Paris Conference. Even the most abstruse of gender scholars have not made that differentiation in over a century. Has that differentiation returned? If that differentiation has become a popular one again, I will have to reconsider how I word what I worded. BY YOUR WORDS, you seem to be thoughtful and learned. In all sincerity, I ask you when and where you came across that differentiation. I have not taught feminist…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/22 07:21 AM
1

you're arrogant enough Ah, I knew you would stoop to the Ad Hominem the moment you had a chance to do so! Your credibility is so poor that I can not stomach reading any word of yours -- and your cheap, tawdry, shameful and disreputable words will only continue to diminish this thread if I continue to enable you to do so. Therefore, for the sake of this thread, I am blocking you, and I hope that the whole world eventually has the chance to block you as well.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/22 07:14 AM
1

No, it's the result of formal and autodidactic education and learning. I realize that actually learning about something first and only forming an opinion afterwards is unfashionable, and your choice of a cheap sarcastic jeer "Is this a joke?" instead of bothering to waste a single syllable on an intelligent response might mean that you also consider learning before forming an opinion to be unfashionable for you as well, but that is your choice. Ignorance is always a choice, and it is one that no…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/22 07:11 AM
1

No, no, feminists don't hate men, they just name everything bad after men and everything good after women. What an odd thing to say in an age when some of the great feminist thinkers have been referred to as "seminal" feminists even though the word "seminal" is related to the word "semen". Have you ever read any of Steinem's or Faludi's feminist writings in defense of men?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/22 07:05 AM
-1

Except it is fact. And I have the credentials that demonstrate I know what I am talking about. And by your words, I doubt your credibility. But for the sake of anyone who reads our words, I will explain. If you wish to understand any philosophy or group of philosophies, you must examine it within historical context. You must look at it with depth and nuance and context and with an overview which considers it in its entirety from both a diachronic and a synchronic perspective. By your words, you …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/22 07:03 AM
-1

I apologize. The number of people on reddit who understand the difference you mention probably number less than a single percentage point, and so the possibility that you knew such a difference did not occur to me. As for "rife with misandry", I still disagree with you, but with one caveat: if you have not only read those texts but did so in classes which first spent weeks ensuring you understood thoroughly the cultural contexts within which said texts were written, then you must realize that th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/22 06:50 AM
1

I myself try to be a better human, and a better poster when it comes to these issues. As do I, though I concede it often feels like a wasted effort on reddit. I almost always try to specify my criticism are against modern Western feminism, to remind the audience that IMO feminism was legit in the old times I agree with you completely! I will also concede that I may be getting too academic. I have been a feminist since I was a teenager fighting for civil rights for women -- and for men! -- and fo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/22 06:44 AM
-5

I am familiar with her work, and while she has my respect, she tends to address "dumbed down but popular" versions instead of the actual seed of truth that existed before it was corrupted. The origin of what we now call feminism among English-speaking peoples can be traced back before the U.S. existed to a time in England when it was forbidden by law (and punished by imprisonment) for any woman to control a business. A woman who inherited land was forced by law to have a male relative control it…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/22 06:29 AM
1

Since you gave an intelligent response (and that is an increasingly rare experience on reddit these days), I will give you a response that respects and honors your own. If we are truly going to assess and analyse a philosophical movement that spawned a political movement, we have little choice but to differentiate between the intentions and claims of the founders and great thinkers and historically-proven theorists of said movement and the intentions and claims of the average folk who may never …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/22 06:07 AM
-3

I've read most of the major feminist writings in English of the past two hundred years, and most of the major feminist writers are NOT basing their feminism on the hatred of men. Whoever claimed that to you either lies or has no grasp of the history of feminism in the English-speaking world.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/22 05:49 AM
-15

I've read most of the major feminist writings in English of the past two hundred years, and most of the major feminist writers are NOT basing their feminism on the hatred of men. Whoever claimed that to you either lies or has no grasp of the history of feminism in the English-speaking world.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/22 05:48 AM
4

Not always a fallacy. If I write, "No true definition of the sun claims that the sun is a giant balloon filled with sour cream," that is NOT a "No True" fallacy. It is just a fact. If I write, "No true definition of an adult will claim that adults are a type of low-calorie dessert topping and only that", that is NOT a "No True" fallacy, it is just a fact. And if I write that "No true definition of feminism refuses to acknowledge misandry and no true definition of feminism says that all evil in t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/22 05:45 AM
1

We should be attacking misandry that pretends to be feminism AND reminding people that NO true feminist has ever promoted misandry nor denied that it exists. If a man who claims not to be racist hates all African-Americans, no matter how often he claims he is not racist, he is racist. If a woman who claims to be feminist advocates bigotry against all men or refuses to admit that misandry exists and that the number of women who rape men or abuse husbands is actually quite high, then she is not a …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/22 04:57 AM
1

I would slightly disagree : I don't think what passes for modern feminism is feminist! Traditional feminism has fought for women's rights. Modern regressive feminists fight against the idea that men are people, too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/09/22 04:30 AM
7

Frequently.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/08/22 12:17 AM
1

Ah. No, I was referencing various online blog posts and letters to the editor and "random street interviews" I have seen over the past two decades in which various interviewed women insisted that it is not possible for a man to be a victim and it is not possible for a woman to victimize and therefore, if any man were ever raped by any woman, he must have deserved it so much that he provoked the woman into doing it to him. This is something I have read again and again, but they were all by women …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/22 12:55 PM
1

Women are oppressed in the United States. So are men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/22 09:29 AM
1

?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/22 09:21 AM
13

Male rape victims of women in the United States are always raped a dozen times : the first time by the female rapist, and the multitude of times after by those who refuse to believe he was raped -- or who suggest that if she raped him, he deserved it since he is a man.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/22 08:02 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter