TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

cpmnriley Archive

View 2 posts and 45 comments by cpmnriley on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-7

"sex work and joking about her mental health means she's brainwashed by feminism" so yes, you want her to be chaste and to keep any personality traits of hers quiet.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 12:22 AM
-10

so you believe she has no agency and that there is no chance that the way she lives her life is an indepenent choice? are women only allowed independence to you if its expressed by being silent and chaste?
/r/MensRights23/01/19 11:28 PM
-13

he's not a troll. this is what "men's rights" activists believe.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 02:22 AM
2

"even if this is a lie, i still choose to believe it!" - you
/r/MensRights16/07/18 02:20 AM
0

this subreddit should be renamed "men projecting their own insecurities" holy shit its a single photo and yall are assuming so many absurd things about this couple just because you hate women doesnt mean every married man does
/r/MGTOW11/07/18 01:37 PM
-1

wtf
/r/MGTOW07/03/18 02:56 PM
-1

holy shit you people are out of your minds. did we watch the same show at all? all of skyler's behavior in the show is because walt suddenly goes from being a timid but loving husband to being mysterious, emotionally distant, aggressive, and as she finds out later, a fucking meth dealer. your pride and egoism would be just as shattered and whacked out if you found out your partner of YEARS AND YEARS suddenly became an entirely different person. do you all think that walter white was the GOOD GUY…
/r/MGTOW07/03/18 02:11 PM
-6

so... are you ~against~ people getting consequences for sexual abuse?
/r/MGTOW23/11/17 05:55 PM
5

it sounds like you are trying to be sarcastic but all i'm reading is the truth.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 06:15 PM
1

eh, i remember reading this off his blog a few months ago. it dances around any sort of defined thesis or purpose. it, like most of kevin's work, is just loose complaining. i may be off base when i say that many local msp poets are tired of guante, but i am not off base when i say that i am sick of him.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 02:37 AM
2

i agree whole-heartedly-- we should be calm and rational, not insane and quick to jump on everyone we disagree with.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 08:25 PM
1

"He's at the show, talking feminism to get into your pants, oh yeah. He'll quote Emma Goldman, but he'll never get up to dance!" -Wingnut Dishwashers Union, Stop Being So Cool And Get Silly your comment reminded me of that line in that song.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 09:16 PM
5

i think people may believe that the community on reddit is the entirety of mr activism. which is silly. feminism isn't srs. why is /r/mensrights the representation of all mra activities across the world? i have always found that strange.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 11:35 PM
1

there's a great masculinist video about this. i am on my phone but i will post it when i get home. EDIT: his name is aoirthoir an broc but he seems to have removed all his vlogs, including the one i was thinking of. i am sorry.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 07:43 PM
1

india is a different issue. i read the bill and yes it seems very vague and excessive, but we must remember that they have a serious problem with rape over there. if rape culture does exist at all, it would exist in india. i am saying this because to me, this is not a men's rights issue, and will not become one, because think of gender dominance as a scale. in the us, it is tipped in women's favor. in the uk, it is further in woman's favor. in india, the women's side of the scale is so much lowe…
/r/MensRights20/03/13 07:40 PM
0

thank YOU for reading it.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:07 PM
1

ah, good old rightsbot, preventing the eternal artist in me from never being finished with a piece.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 05:52 AM
6

then shouldn't feminism or female-centered activism of any kind be working on removing that fear? are they working on removing that fear? or is it our job to remove it? is it anyone's job?
/r/MensRights14/02/13 03:00 AM
3

yeah. she was made a bit deaf by her anger.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 12:19 AM
1

i will try. thank you, friend, for caring. you as well, /u/tyciol.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 12:18 AM
2

everyone does that sometimes. but it is important that we are asking that question, because it allows us to elevate conversations. being aware of ours faults helps us become more efficient and accessible.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 12:17 AM
3

i know, i meant "service" sarcastically. i mean, she is a sweetheart, and i care about her, but i do plan on having a chat about how my feelings are still important regardless of my gender.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 12:11 AM
4

she did the service of apologizing if she made my angry, being faced with "the truth." so i doubt she will listen.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 12:07 AM
12

my red pill moment was a long time ago, before i knew about the movement. i was in junior high, and i wanted something to be done about the kids who bullied me, both emotionally and physically. instead, being told to "man up", it made younger me think "being a boy is really unfair sometimes." years later i will discover the movement and find a thing i feel strongly about. how it made me feel? pretty shitty. my other friends in the conversation are not men's rights activists. i can handle getting…
/r/MensRights13/02/13 11:58 PM
9

i only hope she still wants my friendship regardless of this new discovery about our beliefs. i do not respect or appreciate her any less as a person. i hope that feeling is reciprocal.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 11:20 PM
1

yeah, while there is no men's rights aspect i can see, at the very least it's fucking hilarious.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 04:17 AM
1

the first two parts to these feel like they may become sidebar material, because they really are beautifully written. the other two parts are just plain good fun.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 10:03 PM
2

even without the men's right's aspect, this album is absolutely phenomenal. i've been a huge fan of this band since "foiled" came out, which is the only album i've heard that really captures what love can be, positives and negatives. on this last album, justin completely captured the feeling of divorce (i cannot personally verify, but my divorced friends and parents can). he has always been an underappreciated genius in my eyes.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 04:00 AM
1

there is a prominent feminist slogan that i posted a thread about, which is "feminism is the radical notion that women are people." i was curious about a men's rights converse, and i came up with: men's rights is the radical notion that men can be hurt. if you like that structure, the thread is here. there are many people's inputs in that same format.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 06:15 PM
1

this is exactly what i thought when i wrote the sentence.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 04:45 PM
22

i thought of that, but it seemed a little too sassy. tautology rarely carries a nice tone.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 06:52 AM
3

the purpose of this wasn't to declare masculinity-- it was meant to declare humanity. it has little to do with gender, with black women also being a part of the marches.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 04:12 PM
2

you got me to laugh. i love this film.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 12:35 PM
1

i live in the cities, so i might be able to answer this. st. paul sort of fosters dormancy and inaction in people. the energy of the town is the opposite of motivating and is by no means nurturing. all of the people i know from st. paul prefer to spend their time in minneapolis. qdub might have a different reasoning, though.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 12:31 PM
2

i think we have those in the maplewood alcoholics anonymous house.
/r/MensRights01/09/12 02:42 AM
1

one of those things where people concentrated a word too far down... that being said, sexual objectification does exist for all genders and it is a problem no matter what. people just need to learn how to use the word.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 11:11 PM
1

i agree with you, but the purpose of the term in a legitimate context is to point out that exclusively sexual feelings towards a person might degrade the integrity of the person and the relationship.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 11:02 PM
2

the thread in question, and the screenshot, did not show chris' entire response in that facebook thread? that seems a little lame.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 01:06 AM
3

the girl who posted the "4% isn't big enough to worry about" in the first place? i know her, and went to the same school as her. she did her high school "dissertation" of sorts on sex-positive feminism. i worked on it with her. she was largely unprepared for her final, half-hour presentation. i should not be this mean, and i apologize. but the negativity of this woman is something i have been trying to avoid since i took her out of my life. and now what happens? she manages to royally piss off a…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 06:48 AM
2

i did not intend to imply i felt we were responsible, but, as i said in my edits, my phrasing was indeed poor. and that makes sense as far as a beginning action. i know reading a few comments in here saying "this is hilarious" and such-- they don't seem to help much.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 02:22 PM
-3

but i feel as though there definitely is. if we somehow improve ourselves so that others do not view us so negatively... or am i blissfully naive?
/r/MensRights18/07/12 05:00 AM
0

the board i saw it on was /mu/ of all places, but i could assume it started at /b/.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 04:57 AM
2

see my edit here:
/r/MensRights18/07/12 01:57 AM
-7

because if our relationship with external communities results exclusively in scorn and scapegoating, we are doing something wrong and need to improve the way we interact with external communities. yes, ultimately, we cannot effect the way that people feel. but we are by no means perfect. edit: again, now i realize the flaws in my phrasing. by "i feel the men's rights community is absolutely involved", i meant that we are absolutely involved in the prevention of these things from happening. i did…
/r/MensRights18/07/12 01:51 AM
11

i think they just wanted to fuck with something and "feminism.org" is a funny website to fuck with. to add to the punchline, hey, why not piss off the reddit circlejerk, too! but when your humor derives from pissing other people off, people eventually become more tolerant of it, and you stand there alone, like an asshole. i am wondering how to speed up the 'tolerance' part.
/r/MensRights18/07/12 01:33 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter