TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

crackinthewall Archive

View 0 posts and 44 comments by crackinthewall on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm also confused but I'm leaning towards him saying that the Skype conversation was via voice call, not via chat. If that is the case, I'm pretty sure Skype doesn't have a built-in call recording feature. To be honest, I don't see what recording it would do now. The only thing I can think of is holding such admission as future evidence in case she does it again to someone else but that reeks of paranoia. People change and if it happened a couple of years ago, I'd like to believe that she has ch…
/r/MensRights18/07/15 07:46 AM
7

And sadly, the definition is still only limited to being penetrated against your will. Good thing I like getting a finger up my butt while receiving a blow job. You now officially know too much.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 03:19 PM
1

They're so fabulous they don't need sex to reproduce yet millions are being born every year.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 06:17 AM
3

Or that there were evidence that proves that yes, discrimination with her previous firm- they supported her waaaaay better than anyone else. I long for the day when criticism of a person would not devolve into misogyny/misandry! because everyone is smart enough to know that each individual has inexcusable faults.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 11:51 PM
1

Legally maybe but that should not be the case when the parents are separated. Did the judge not know that the mother was unemployed? The mother can't exactly take care of their child if she herself cannot take care of herself. If they agreed to a joint custody, why should the judge, by default, ask if they agree that the mother should have primary custody. You'd think that the judge would have been a lot more careful given that he defended Banita Jacks, a woman who ended up killing her own famil…
/r/MensRights01/07/15 06:34 AM
8

Just the fact that the mother is unemployed should have helped swing the verdict in the father's favor. Think about it, where would she get the money to sustain herself let alone her child? The father? It also doesn't help that the judge has decided a similar yet a lot more tragic case.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 03:39 AM
3

I would have told my sister loudly that "these parents here thought I was out here to rape the children, could you believe that?"
/r/MensRights24/06/15 05:39 AM
4

It should be mandatory for the reporter to approach anyone they find "creeping on the kids" first before calling the cops. What the fuck happened with common human decency?
/r/MensRights24/06/15 05:33 AM
19

Wasn't Taylor Swift sort of bullied to accept feminism? Now she's a celebrated feminist icon because she was now properly educated as to what feminism really means.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 03:37 AM
2

I don't see how anyone can say this sub is an echo chamber. I could dissent with the majority and I'd have to be a huge jackass to be banned. On any other similar sub, I would have been banned for going against the narrative.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 03:14 AM
3

Evidence? How about the missing bodies that have been found with proof that the victim was raped before being killed but even then, those cases do not warrant being said that it often happen after rape. It does happen and I never said it doesn't but does the statistics prove that it happens often (raped then murdered)? You see, a single word can change the whole context of an argument. Clumping those two crimes together doesn't change the fact that both sexes are vulnerable to rape. Or murder.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 10:50 AM
3

Raped AND murdered? To say that it often happens would be a serious jump in logic. While being murdered after being raped is a serious concern, you can't just say that happens often without backing that up with statistics.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 02:10 AM
3

I just read a Cracked crap about the truths about the MRM and as expected, the author had a hard time separating the two movements apart. It's really not that hard but when you have a major comedy website that's no longer funny link to this subreddit and redpill and talk about those two as if they're the same thing, it's bound to poison the well.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 06:53 PM
4

To walk home at night without fear is a dream many people have and it's not restricted to one gender.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 02:09 AM
13

And you'll always be on each other's to-do list.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 03:00 PM
2

Some feminists focused too much on her "loving men" as the reason she is not a feminist when what she was saying was that she's not a feminist because she wants equality.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 03:55 PM
1

I'm pretty sure a video showing a group of people ganging up on you would support fearing for your life.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 07:00 PM
3

It's clear there's a difference as to how these kind of jokes are taken. If it was man making those same comments about a 15 year old girl, it wouldn't be taken that lightly. A child is a child, it shouldn't matter what their sex/gender is.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 06:42 AM
1

I find it amusing that I only tweeted one link and her response was to tweet about it extensively without tagging or responding to my link. It's like she didn't want to discuss it at all and she wants to be the only voice heard.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 03:37 AM
2

Haha I just experienced this online. She claims to be inclusive but if you want to talk about MRA, you're out. You won't even get a word in because she's oh so brave for unfollowing you on Twitter just because you tweeted ONE MRA article in the last twelve months. She laughs at men's rights for some reason.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 08:00 PM
2

We held a symposium once and one of the speakers was our deviance professor and she claimed with full conviction that men can never be raped because we get an erection so it means that we have been aroused and we wanted it. I'm not even sure she knows what she was talking about back then. Back when I was around12, our gay neighbor rubbed me through my shorts and I got an erection. I felt so dirty and ashamed and at 12 years of age, I never wanted to be touched like that. I wanted to play video g…
/r/MensRights14/04/14 04:16 PM
13

First picture in and I knew it was written by a man. It's so incredibly sexist (against men) and it enforces the dating status quo.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 02:34 AM
2

I've read everything on freegeoffcole.com and I can't believe a woman can still harass her children and ex-husband when it is blatantly obvious that she's a horrible human being. Not to mention how she dodged paying the attorney's fees Geoff was entitled to by claiming she doesn't have money.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 05:03 PM
1

I forgot which celebrity it was but that was some serious gold-digging shit. He was forced to pay his ex-wife a lot of for alimony just because she was used to this certain lifestyle with him. Have the gender reversed and there will be mass outrage over something like that.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 07:43 AM
2

Can't say I don't agree that judges usually rule in favor of the father in extreme cases but that's too much for exaggeration. A prostitute (male or female) can still be a good parent IMO but with the way people view these things, if you're viewed as being immoral, you'll have a slim chance of winning. Good lord, adoption agencies usually have a hard time letting gay or lesbian couples from adopting.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 07:42 AM
3

Possible but highly unlikely. The court rarely separates the mother and child in the best interest of the child.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 02:00 AM
2

Upvoted. I think alimony payment should only be considered if the other spouse has been incapacitated. It could be because of a serious illness or medical condition, an accident that have left them unable to perform their previous line of work, etc. It should never take into account their lifestyle as a married couple because divorce is basically a rescission of the marriage contract. Everyone basically go back to how their lives were pre-marriage. Child support is of course a different matter a…
/r/MensRights12/10/13 01:53 AM
4

I decided to get circumcised because of peer pressure though that's not entirely accurate. They see circumcision as a rite of passage so the adults expect you to get circumcised before you reach puberty and kids will tease you if you don't go through it. Looking back, I shouldn't have gone through with it.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 12:27 PM
9

A similar game with the genders reversed will never be banned on the Appstore because it wouldn't even be published in the first place. Apple wouldn't approve it because violence against women is already deemed offensive while this app was seen as humorous. Hell, an app where you order your girlfriend around would raise a shitstorm for Apple if it makes it to the Appstore.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 06:46 PM
2

Some countries have laws against adultery and/or concubinage and sometimes, they are considered criminal acts instead of a civil offense.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 03:44 PM
1

But does it change the fact that Tubecrush caters to the female population? Did I ever say that "creepshots was okay because women objectify teh menz?" I'll quote my other post for you: So it's basically the same kind of pictures found on Tapthatguy (thanks to Jezebel) and Tubecrush and just as creepy? I thought it was downright offensive with all these talk about upskirting. Both are creepy but do you see these people complain about other people's privacy? From what I've read about r/creepshot,…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 10:52 AM
1

I'd be offended if I was a journalist. Even so, Chen is not a journalist. He is an editor in a gossip blog and gossip is never concerned with facts. Journalists deals with news, does proper research, makes sure they know both sides and to present everything as neutral as possible. Just the facts, no unnecessary rant to no end.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 12:58 AM
6

TIL men have no reasonable expectations of privacy. Women can objectify men (e.g. Tubecrush) because men "come from a position of privilege".
/r/MensRights17/10/12 12:43 AM
1

Because you can't do anything inappropriate to a man? At least that's how idiots justify how anonymously taking and posting pictures of attractive men is different and should be acceptable while taking the same pictures of women is despicable. From what I've heard, the photos on r/creepshots isn't all that offensive but that's what feminists have been riled up about. If there's anything people should be offended about, it should be his involvement with subreddits like r/jailbait and how Adrian C…
/r/MensRights17/10/12 12:41 AM
2

Don't need to with a name like "Out My Boyfriend". When I was in college, I admired feminists for their courage but just a few years later, I saw the movement for what it was. Ideologically, it was for gender equality but to those self-confessed feminists, it was about women getting special treatment and men being the inferior sex. I'd be all for it if these same people would be outraged about sites like those we've mentioned or Jezebel's thighlights but sadly, we have a penis and we're not capa…
/r/MensRights16/10/12 02:57 PM
3

Probably because it is something that will infuriate a lot of people because "THINK OF THE CHILDREN OSHIT!". We wouldn't even bother to research because victimising children is something that we can all agree on. If I didn't read about him, I would probably be siding with the mob here. Seriously, Chen should strip himself of his title as a "journalist" because his piece was filled with so much vitriol that the facts were ignored just so he can paint violentacrez in a worse light.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 12:32 PM
1

I haven't been to r/creepshot but I've seen Tubecrush before. So can someone be immediately identified just by looking at the pictures submitted? I found Tubecrush to be pretty creepy for that reason alone and how sexually suggestive the captions can be. These feminazis will have a field day if Tubecrush pushes through with their plan to create a site that hosts similar images but only of women.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 12:25 PM
1

Why can't they just hire a security guard, mount some security camera and train some goddamn dog for everybody's piece of mind?
/r/MensRights16/10/12 06:50 AM
4

So it's basically the same kind of pictures found on Tapthatguy (thanks to Jezebel) and Tubecrush and just as creepy? I thought it was downright offensive with all these talk about upskirting.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 06:44 AM
1

But she should be considered principal by inducement. Would they have acted violently against the innocent victim if she hadn't made that false accusation?
/r/MensRights03/07/12 09:09 PM
6

I say publish her fucking name! Men accused of rape would have their names published in major newspapers while the victim's name would've been hidden. She's not a rape victim so she doesn't deserve the same protection that REAL rape victims deserve.
/r/MensRights31/05/12 04:52 AM
44

I would have charged them as well till they beg. Self-righteous people who can't accept their mistake and who would lie doesn't deserve the defense of good faith.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 10:30 AM
2

You do know how hard it is for a girl to assume you like them right? Yes, they will feel it but they wouldn't act on it (say they like you too or reject you or let you down easy) because there's nothing to act on. It's cynical to think that the only reason they want your friendship is to validate themselves. Let's face the fact that women were not raised to make the first move. In most of the world that would be looked down upon even when it should be perfectly normal. So unless you make it clea…
/r/seduction08/03/12 10:10 AM
3

Because it feels good. It helps both party get into the mood and it is an intimate act which makes you feel closer to your partner.
/r/seduction11/01/12 01:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter