TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

craftor708 Archive

View 1 post and 101 comments by craftor708 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
18

Social Issuescraftor708/r/MensRights22/04/21 06:55 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

I mean, if she ends up doing this against his wishes (and the best interest of the child) absolutely dump that bitch.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 04:38 PM
18

Lets be careful with our terminology. It's not 'restoration'. The tissue torn away won't be recovered without major advances in cloning tissues (which are coming). What is available now is cosmetic enhancements to partially restore functionality, but not any feeling. Head will be covered again and the mucous membrane it's made of will begin to get rid of the rough skin it generated to protect itself and it will aid in mechanical motion. You were still damaged beyond our current ability to repair…
/r/MensRights27/04/21 03:32 PM
1

Doesn't matter the functionality, someone went and cosmetically altered their genitals without their consent. It's child abuse and pretty barbaric.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 03:09 PM
1

person in the story
/r/MensRights27/04/21 02:43 AM
5

yeah just like women can choose not to have sex, and therefore an abortion is never needed, because a women chose to engage in sex and therefore accepted the risk!
/r/MensRights26/04/21 10:53 PM
3

Yeah, the women who have them cut off are.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 10:51 PM
2

Yeah, when the piercing is removing your whole ear. It's just a flap of skin, after all.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 10:51 PM
3

and they currently have the most say
/r/MensRights26/04/21 10:50 PM
1

literally unable to see men as people
/r/MensRights26/04/21 10:50 PM
1

I mean i still wear a mask, but research is showing how useless they are. Indoors the virus spreads up to 60 feet some studies have shown. Way more virtue signalling than actually effective, for sure. But it's also a great way get people to leave you alone. Just cough into it.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 10:49 PM
3

She thinks of you as a lesser person just for disagreeing with her on a gender issue. Doesn't matter which one you pick, or how well you put it. It's basic tribalism and she's defending her sisterhood, who conveniently think male genital mutilation is the bee's knees.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 10:47 PM
6

because feminists (well, women, really) are masters of manipulating language. They get much more practice during infant development than men, due to gender norms forced on men. Little things like 'sugar coating' so no one's feelings get hurt are second nature at this point, and are used just as often to hide the really ugly reality behind the words.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 10:44 PM
1

Do people include quelling revolts and defensive actions when saying stupid bullshit like "men start every war"? Seems like a loaded (and totally unsourced and uncited) opinion. Even more interesting that you're more willing to pick apart the source provided, defending the stance that provided 0 data at all.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 10:39 PM
7

https://qz.com/967895/throughout-history-women-rulers-were-more-likely-to-wage-war-than-men/
/r/MensRights26/04/21 05:45 PM
6

no, by women and some other men
/r/MensRights26/04/21 03:16 PM
9

Yes that's right, and we're forgetting the true victims of war: Women! Women lose their fathers, brothers, and sons. The true cost of war. [/s]
/r/MensRights26/04/21 03:12 PM
13

Troll or forget the [/s] tag? Women leaders are historically far more warmongering than their male counterparts.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 03:11 PM
12

Except that's an unproven generalization. A tribe that does sacrifice all its men is then in no position to do so again, for about 10-20 years. Yes there is some truth to it, but the to pretend that blindly sacrificing men for the sake of women will lead a tribe to prosperity is a fallacy that ignores the benefits men provide to a tribe outside of sacrificing their lives.
/r/MensRights26/04/21 03:10 PM
2

And why are those roles tied to being a man specifically, and not just a dutiful citizen? Edit: Also, what are these "rewards" you speak of? absence of shame hardly counts as a reward
/r/MensRights22/04/21 08:29 PM
2

Gotcha. Was also reading your comments with not the best interpretation. My bad. And it sounds like we all agree on the "each man decides what being a man is" beyond the biological basis, which is my problem with these other subs trying to define a "path to manhood". They want "being a man" to be extra things that people have to qualify for, specifically to them.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 08:25 PM
2

tbh i upvoted then downvoted about 15 times going back and forth on whether this was a funny joke or not. Damn poe's law.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 08:14 PM
1

My premise was the opposite: That there is an objective definition for "Man" that people try to redefine for their own ends, and not for any reasons other than selfishness and power.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 08:10 PM
1

I edited my post to take out baiting. I'd misread what you'd said. Sorry about that. How is "Man" == "Adult Human Male" not a strong definition?
/r/MensRights22/04/21 07:58 PM
0

Would have loved for you to point out the contradictions
/r/MensRights22/04/21 07:49 PM
3

Yeah, see? Just like this!
/r/MensRights22/04/21 07:43 PM
1

Or, baring that, go with a scientific definition of the adult male of the human species. There is the definition in our head that we each make like you said, and then there is the objective reality definition that we understand to the best of our ability as monkeys. Thank you, great point.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 07:41 PM
2

No. A woman is an adult human female. A transwoman is an adult human male pretending to be an adult human female. We have different words for a reason.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 07:27 PM
4

Gender dysphoria is a mental disorder for a reason. It's defined by how they are not men, but feel that way. Epitome of feels > reals. How we treat them is not related to how we treat men as a whole, and only further shows how much nonsense is put on the "Man" label in order to try and drive men's behavior. Edit: a word
/r/MensRights22/04/21 07:20 PM
2

Good advice. Still only going to engage with people at the level they choose to engage with. Probably a personal issue, but i don't believe that people who choose not to take the high road deserve to have the high road given in return.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 07:17 PM
6

Man is whether societies define it or not. A Man is an adult human male, if you are adding anything beyond that you're into manipulation bullshit territory.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 07:12 PM
3

I 100% could have phrased it less aggressively, but i don't know if thats the reason for the ban. His original post is more of a rant in the first place.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 07:08 PM
7

^ Fucking THIS. This is concern trolling and gaslighting, and where are the mods on these posts today. Trying to reframe the movement and sub as a hate group by pretending thats all it is and asking for change.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 09:10 PM
10

Right? We may not want them as enemies but they sure show up as some whenever men speak up. So many "yeah but dont blame women for womens behavior!" posts today...
/r/MensRights14/04/21 09:08 PM
7

I'm now 99% sure you have no idea what a strawman fallacy actually looks like.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 06:43 PM
6

Anyone reading this thread and thinking of going into the army, don't. The first thing they do it turn you into a take-it-from-behind compliance drone. Exactly the Beta male society wants. Just look up all of the army wives stories, it's a group of Beta's trained for violence.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/21 10:54 PM
2

Find your purpose by becoming a mindless drone for someone else's purpose! 10/10 advice right here
/r/TheRedPill06/04/21 10:50 PM
2

Or he'll have killed himself from despair. But glad this 100% money-back guarantee is here to save the day!
/r/TheRedPill06/04/21 10:49 PM
3

thats not just how it reads, thats how it is
/r/MensRights06/04/21 10:44 PM
4

The reasons change depending on the group. Feminists see rights as a zero sum game. More for us means less for them, for example. The real reason is, imo, much more insidious. Society needs men to function, and it needs them working and not complaining. And it definitely doesn't need them complaining about the things society does to force them into those undesirable work conditions. It's mass indoctrination to treat males as disposable, and it will react, in some cases violently, to people who p…
/r/MensRights06/04/21 09:41 PM
2

with one currently held to a much higher standard than the other for this responsibility
/r/MensRights05/04/21 02:43 PM
17

I know, right? “Find out what people want and give it to them, and do that till you become rich. ??? Profit” This person hasn’t actually taken the red pill, just read some Jordan Peterson and felt smart.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/21 04:14 PM
11

In a unanimous decision written by Justice Paul Thissen, the state Supreme Court said the lower court's definition of mentally incapacitated in this case "unreasonably strains and stretches the plain text of the statute" because the victim was drunk before she met her attacker. Does this mean she can't claim rape ever? Doesn't seem like that's what they're saying. Just that the mentally incapacitated state isn't a reasonable argument in this case. Does this mean she is unable to seek justice wit…
/r/MensRights02/04/21 05:06 PM
15

So if existing as you say, i'd agree those are horrible rape promoting laws. I just doubt you're being truthful here. Those laws sound like they make it so you can't automatically say drunk==rape, if they're preventing prosecutions of rape through other evidence, point the way and I'll have your back. Until then, this is just the same feminism scare mongering that was mentioned before.
/r/MensRights02/04/21 04:45 PM
9

Oh feminism and racism have a long and storied history. Lookup some youtube videos for Shahrazad Ali, she's a bit of a religious nut sometimes, but her points on how feminism tears apart black communities is on point.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 10:57 PM
3

And I am perfectly capable of holding each of those parties accountable separately. I never said this was solely women's fault or that i blame only them. I do encourage not diminishing your blame for mother's with sorry excuses like "well its a societal belief" or "many men do too" Those parties have their own responsibility and that doesn't diminish a mother's failed responsibility towards her sexually mutilated child.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 02:33 PM
5

Yeah the cry it out method only really teaches children that people aren't going to come to help you when you think you're in pain and are asking for help. Love to hear of some wholesome care-giving. Sounds like we need more Squirts around being parents.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 12:58 AM
3

ah.. Yeah they're who i looked into.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 12:56 AM
3

lol right? Shouldn't be laughing, she has a high potential to cause harm.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 08:58 PM
3

Funny how quick they go to BUT I NEVER MENTIONED THAT when trying to point how how the same logic with FGM doesn't work. Like, lol, we're not changing the subject by making a very comparable analogy.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 08:24 PM
3

Got some good personal recommendations?
/r/MensRights31/03/21 08:23 PM
4

So is what this guy is posting. Your one source doesn't invalidate all the others. If you'd like to post a specific source countering the claim, feel free, but posting the same source with "No, i promise, its credible!" means nothing. BTW, bible has billions of citations, and is 'fact checked' by people. Doesn't make it a valid source in this case.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 08:21 PM
5

Yeah you can see a lot of men in this thread just flat out denying it causes any harm at all.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 08:18 PM
3

You're literally in a thread of people saying its harm, providing sources that it causes physical and psychological harm. He already is disabled. You fucked up as a parent, and your rationalizations (assuming your 'if i've already done it' is accurate) are just about making yourself feel better. You don't care about your son, if this is how you're treating him. It makes you a failure as a parent, especially the way you're arguing against it. Blocking you now, have the last word if you like. All …
/r/MensRights31/03/21 08:12 PM
3

Even your clarification is wrong. I can't do whatever i want to my family, if the things i want harm them. And we have many legal protections in place for this, they just often don't apply to men.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 07:42 PM
3

You literally are NOT allowed to do whatever you want to your baby. Thats the entire idea behind child abuse, child protective services, .... i this must be a troll omg. Reporting and moving on.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 07:36 PM
0

Me. Right now. In a conversation about infant bodily autonomy rights, which child rape very much violates, in far too many ways, kinda like circumcision does.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 07:34 PM
3

So if you're alive and healthy and not gonna have a shorter life, its totally fine what i do to you? Or to a baby? Do i actually need to pull the cases of hospitals giving sex reassignment surgery to cover their asses over botched circumcisions? It makes me sick to go look up, i'd appreciate doing it yourself. But seriously this same logic justifies raping babies because (those people believe) it cures aids. Something legitimately done in some countries.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 07:28 PM
1

Tell that to child rapists.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 07:26 PM
6

Or so selfish about your own sexual gratification you don't care about the harm it causes others. [s] You know what'd be great? If just every woman let me screw them rawdog whenever i wanted. The sex is just better. You know what? Lets do it when they're babies so they're used to it when they grow up. [/s] It's a line of thinking that shows a lack of empathy more than anything else.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 07:23 PM
8

Couple with studies that baby boys are left to "cry it out" at a much higher rate than girls. Seriously, they time how quickly parents respond to crying, there's a massive difference. And so now he's got his penis being tortured, dealing with the healing without painkillers, and his primary caregivers are leaving him alone to work through it. All before a year old. And people wonder why some men are fucked up mentally when it comes to emotions and bonding and shit. Literally born into a HOW DARE…
/r/MensRights31/03/21 07:15 PM
5

You bring up some good benefits, however when i looking into the hanging and vacuum clamps and user stories, they were clearly uncomfortable and often painful, and that it is something you have to continually upkeep. And those user reports of 90% feeling back i wouldn't trust even if you had posted a source, because those nerve endings DO NOT grow back. It's stretched scar tissue, not even close to the same thing. All that being said, I'm glad it worked for you, and it may not be as useless as i…
/r/MensRights31/03/21 06:53 PM
3

Or in this thread people put parents trying to protect their children's genitals in the same camp as the anti-vaccine camp. And i see what you're saying, but i don't like the characterization of X% is your fault, X% is this other person's fault. They aren't mutually exclusive or part of the same pie. A parent choosing not to protect their kid is responsible for that. A religion indoctrinating and pressuring people and organizations have a whole different level of responsibility and accountabilit…
/r/MensRights31/03/21 06:02 PM
6

Oh, trolling and not interested in accurate information. Got it, moving on.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 05:46 PM
6

I do, and if you're questioning this you're not reading much of this thread, or of this sub. Also, stop trying to twist my words. INFANT genital mutilation is wrong. There are cases you could come up with where it is medically necessary, but they are <1% of circumcisions. You trying to tie vaccine morons with people upset at being sexually violated as infants shows exactly where you stand.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 05:26 PM
3

And then Oprah brags about how nice those foreskins make her face cream. (yeah, they get sold to cosmetic companies, among others)
/r/MensRights31/03/21 05:24 PM
7

Vaccines and genital mutilation are not in the same ballpark. Come back and try again later.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 04:58 PM
0

It really isn't stupidity. It is documented maliciousness. Non religious USA circumcisions were pushed by Kellog with the STATED reason of "Reducing sexual pleasure". That's maliciousness, not stupidity or ignorance.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 04:37 PM
5

Yes, you're just not allowed to have the opinion that it's OK to do it to children (who are incapable of consent)
/r/MensRights31/03/21 04:35 PM
10

You and millions of others, buddy.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 04:35 PM
3

Not to mention they can't anesthetize a baby. They use a few numbing drops before cutting, but its basically nothing. MRI's of those babies show they're suffering extreme psychological trauma and only go quiet because they're going into shock.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 04:34 PM
6

Terrible analogy. How about: "Whats your problem, i was violently sexually assaulted as a baby girl and i'm fine! Whats the problem with sexually assaulting babies?"
/r/MensRights31/03/21 04:28 PM
4

Not often enough, its still about 50% of newborn boys in the USA.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 04:27 PM
9

It's the removal of some parts of the penis, specifically the foreskin that is a protective layer but also has a shitton of nerves. Its popular because of the jewish religion and Kellog (yes the guy who made the cereal) pushed it a hundred years ago because he wanted men to have less sex and do more work, and circumcision makes the penis lose a lot of feeling. Edit: Dunno your gender, but the female equivalent of the standard circumcision procedure would be cutting away the skin covering and aro…
/r/MensRights31/03/21 04:23 PM
2

I understand this can help some people, but it's bullshit. Its all about stretching existing skin to try and recover functionality, but the nerves that were severed never grow back. Edit: It also means wearing an painful penis stretching device for hours basically every day, or the skin stretches back to normal
/r/MensRights31/03/21 04:21 PM
5

If my religion required raping baby girls 8 days after birth, me saying "Well everyone was doing it" means jack shit. I participated in the harm, and i would be responsible. In court, sure you would call it a mitigating circumstance, but we're not in court. You're a mother responsible for caring for your children, and you irreversibly harmed them due to your own poor judgement. We can hold both society responsible for encouraging this and you responsible for personally doing it. They're not mutu…
/r/MensRights31/03/21 04:11 PM
4

Agreed, this is her own failure to recognize society was harming her child, through her. Recognizing it's a larger issue does not absolve her of responsibility for this. It will cause lifelong psychological damage, and handwaving it away as "Oh they're victims of tradition!" is just a terrible way of dismissing their trauma and shifting blame away from the person explicitly responsible for their protection and care.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 04:07 PM
5

And its still not enough. We should do more than talking, perhaps.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 04:04 PM
8

Look up CPTSD and Trauma base brainwashing. Basically if you want good cult members damage their genitals and call it an expression of devotion.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 04:00 PM
20

Wrong. 100% blame women. Women fail the motherhood test of "protect your children" between hours and days after giving birth. Men have the excuse of rationalizing the same abuse done to them. Can you imagine a woman handing you a newborn baby girl and you thinking "Yeah, lets cut this up a bit". I absolutely blame women for this.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 03:31 PM
7

Through sexual assault (battery if we're being pedantic)
/r/MensRights30/03/21 08:37 PM
4

Absolutely. It should be classified and protected in every way that FGM is
/r/MensRights30/03/21 08:29 PM
1

Depends on the circumstance. Pretty sure all male politicians sign up for the draft, which eliminates most of the hypocrisy. Those that advocate for war while also using legal loopholes to get themselves exempted after signing draft? 100%, absolutely treat the same way. Same for those who advocate for war while also exempting their loved ones.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 06:10 PM
1

Except those positions where they are causing harm are all federal elected positions. This reason is enough for me to not vote for any woman who hasn't taken steps to address them. That is me keeping women out of politics, which is what OP said. Edit: All else being equal. There are other decisions between candidates that could get me to vote for a woman, but outside of that, yes I'm technically actively working to keep women out of politics because of this.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 05:40 PM
0

But there IS a valid argument that they have more voting rights than men, because they don't have the draft prereq to vote. It is entirely reasonable to call this out, and to question whether people who aren't affected by these sexist decisions should have been able to be elected to those decision making places at all. I'd have the same concerns over an evangelical christian man taking over as head of whatever government agency deals with women's health and planned parenthood and all that.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 05:24 PM
0

How is this misogyny? We have politicians who are categorically immune from the effects of their decisions, its not our fault they're using gender to do it. If they wanted the respect men get, they could sign up for the army reserve or any other such symbolic gesture, but they don't.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 04:51 PM
4

You mean kind of like how feminism got female infant genital mutilation outlawed but with the exact same category of procedures on little boys they're mysteriously silent.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 10:38 PM
6

Great advice except emotion is the motivating force behind all of our behavior, and ignoring it causes severe psychological problems. "You're a bad slave and a worse master" - Jordan Peterson Even pop psychology calls this shit out. You can't treat yourself like a slave, for long. Your subconscious rebels and in the end always wins. This is a naive as telling fat people "just stop stuffing your face fatso hurr hurr". OMFG this subreddit and "Just go to the gym bro!" posts. I'd be willing to bet …
/r/TheRedPill23/03/21 01:31 AM
-1

True, but neither is circumcision. US is just the one i have stats for. But from what i can see, the practice of "beating boys into shape" so they act the way people want them to (i.e. profitable for others, caring more about what they provide to others than taking care of themselves, etc) are not remotely isolated to the US. Autism is a neurodevelopmental disorder. Keyword here is 'developmental'. You're not just born with it, you have risk factors and things happen in early childhood that set …
/r/MensRights28/01/21 11:55 PM
-1

Infant Genital Mutilation. MRI scans of babies undergoing circumcision show the same symptoms as adult PTSD, affects working memory, attention, trust in others, the ability to relate to others, etc. There's a whole bunch of research on the damage it causes, and it's currently performed on 60% of baby boys in the US. That many develop autism later is 0 surprise to me, though i know of no study specifically relating the two.
/r/MensRights28/01/21 11:32 PM
4

In the rapid blood transfusion example, being willing to donate blood changes the charge from manslaughter to vehicular negligence. There are no consequences for murdering the child
/r/MensRights01/11/20 04:42 PM
4

Who said rape jokes were OK? Or treated nearly as nonchalantly
/r/MensRights19/08/20 09:11 PM
45

Long winded “Treat yourself as someone you’re responsible for helping”
/r/TheRedPill06/06/20 10:34 PM
1

MRAs should ... follow feminism ... and condemn MEN for bad behavior? Tell your brother to read The Manipulated Man by Esther Vilar. That’ll shut him up right quick. Really opens your eyes to how women think about men. Edit: The reason you have a different experience here as opposed to those other subreddits is this place is not an echo chamber. Yes it’s heavily moderated, and for good reason, but everyone here cares far more about the merit of an argument and it’s facts and sources rather than …
/r/MensRights11/02/20 12:06 AM
1

Don’t enable this behavior. She’s here seeking validation, don’t give it. She has other communities far more sympathetic, this is just trolling. Evidenced by constantly repeating the same point of being in a apartment with a broken leg, waiting for strangers on the internet to tell her someone else is responsible for the conditions in her life. Stop supporting this narcissistic bullshit. Many people have clearly laid out paths for her to seek help, and instead she wants someone to “without quali…
/r/MensRights10/02/20 05:03 PM
2

Don’t enable this behavior. She’s here seeking validation, don’t give it. She has other communities far more sympathetic, this is just trolling. Evidenced by constantly repeating the same point of being in a apartment with a broken leg, waiting for strangers on the internet to tell her someone else is responsible for the conditions in her life. Stop supporting this narcissistic bullshit. Many people have clearly laid out paths for her to seek help, and instead she wants someone to “without quali…
/r/MensRights10/02/20 05:01 PM
1

I upvoted you, then reread your last paragraph, and then down voted you. Uncowardly enough?
/r/MensRights29/09/18 10:08 PM
2

Don't know if this is still going, I just saw the post. I'd still answer some questions if you need it, though
/r/MensRights19/09/18 04:41 PM
6

Oh god i just saw this on google news. Record holder for the most infuriatingly sexist thing I've seen this week. ​ ... I wish that record could be over a longer time period, given the content.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 03:59 PM
4

not helpful
/r/MensRights28/02/16 08:27 PM
4

It's not true at all actually.. Will take me a while to find the source, since i found it years ago and didn't bookmark it, but there is a study that hypothesized this and then found that the Y chromosome has a way to repair damage by folding itself in half and copying the genes over. Effectively the same as having an X pair except in one chromosome instead of two. Edit https://www.hhmi.org/news/page6.html Not the source of my info but close enough
/r/MensRights03/04/13 12:18 AM
10

Simply the calling it feminism, despite what feminism has or hasn't done over the decades, alienates those who do not identify with the word female. There is a study (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=102518565) which talks about how language changes our perceptions of an object. The study asked two groups who spoke different languages with gender specific nouns to describe a bridge in their language. In the first group the word for bridge was a feminine word and that group ch…
/r/MensRights10/10/12 08:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter