TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

cranktheguy Archive

View 0 posts and 426 comments by cranktheguy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
16

It's like no matter what happens, they just want control over their own body. Uh, doesn't everyone deserve this?
/r/MensRights26/06/22 02:11 PM
1

Rock did his job as a comedian. Will Smith is just upset because of his marriage problems and acted out like a child.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 10:55 PM
1

You could be an adult and bring this up as a serious topic of conversation. Tell her your concerns as you've told them to us. See if she acts like an adult back. If she doesn't see your side, then maybe it's not going to work out.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 01:32 PM
1

This article backs up some of what you said. More educated women tend to have richer husbands, and it turns out it's easier to not work when your husband is rich. I wonder how much this contributes to the wage gap.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 09:35 PM
5

At least learn to spell.
/r/MensRights27/11/19 06:16 PM
1

but you were wrong about the military service. No, there are definitely some discrepancies in his account. I didn't say he didn't serve - I said he lied about his service. He didn't serve in Iraq. It's not a simple misunderstanding when you claim you have 2 PHDs and then turn out to be a broke college drop out. The dude is a liar through and through.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 07:34 PM
1

If you're quoting from the divorce record, why'd you skip the part where he claimed he served in Iraq? Or the part where he claimed he had multiple PHDs while not actually being a college grad? The guy lied about a lot of things, so claiming it was all part of some misunderstanding is dishonest at best.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 06:25 PM
-1

A jury of her peers in Texas did. That should tell you something.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 02:21 PM
-2

So what? It's not a judgement of his caracther. Lying about military says a whole lot about your character. The dude is a complete grifter that lied about his service in Iraq and going to college. Why would you believe anything else he says?
/r/MensRights17/11/19 02:13 PM
0

Even IF that's true It's quite true. what has it to do with his child's sex? The only person making these claims is a liar who lied about his education (saying he had degrees when he never finished college), his military service (he lied in saying he was a career marine who served in Iraq), and his wealth. There's literally nothing true coming out of his liars mouth, and you believe it. You are dumb. You're the one taken in by a liar.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 02:11 PM
-6

Go to your favorite search engine and find a news source you trust. But as for truth, the dad in this case is a confirmed liar: he lied about his military service. Nothing says "trustworthy" like stolen valor.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 02:55 AM
1

There's a whole host of misinformation being spread about this story. I suggest you look to a mainstream source instead of listening to guy blogging on youtube about it.
/r/MensRights17/11/19 02:33 AM
9

Unisex bathrooms end up being the cleanest.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 06:16 PM
1

I didn't mention weight, and I've seen ugly that's only going to be fixed with a nice personality and a paper bag.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 10:09 PM
16

this bitch attacks him over his beliefs. Beliefs are not an immutable characteristic. Like I don't think you should make fun of someone for their skin color or because they're ugly - they can't change that. But your actions and your beliefs are ripe for criticism. If you're for kicking puppies, I'm gonna call you out on it. If you believe the world is flat, I'm gonna call you a moron.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 05:19 PM
0

Here and here are where the claim is made.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 11:35 PM
2

Correlation isn't causation So being black doesn't cause crime. Agreed.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 09:12 PM
0

I don't see how you think your graph that only correlates slightly higher takes away from the fact that being black correlates so well. The first rule of statistics is "correlation is not causation". Nothing about being black suddenly causes people to want to commit crimes. The same is not true of poverty: people want things they know they can never afford, and sometimes they even need things they can't afford. But no black person suddenly looks in the mirror and says, "Well, this dark skin of m…
/r/MensRights08/08/19 08:38 PM
0

Besides i could throw data at you all day you won't change your mind Says the person who just had data thrown at them. Did you change your mind? Nope, you claimed the real data would prove you right! LOL! Why don't you post some more of your little racist pictures. I'm sure that the reason you post those instead of links to real studies is that "no one wants you to connect the dots."
/r/MensRights08/08/19 08:14 PM
0

Why did you use wikipedia for both big guy? Um, I didn't? I used the same wiki source from your chart and World Atlas. Also black people are disproportionately poor Which is exactly why they commit disproportionately more crimes. Unless you have some theory about your racial superiority you'd like to run past us. Please tell me more about your master race. which you will not like the results. Show them to me.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 07:45 PM
0

Take your racist shit somewhere else. I even did the math for you using data from here and here. Poverty has a correlation of 88.7% vs. your 80.5% for being black.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 07:30 PM
0

America doesn't have a "black" problem, it has a poverty problem. The highest indicator for someone to commit a crime is poverty - more so than race.
/r/MensRights08/08/19 07:03 PM
1

My bad, the Georgia law includes those exceptions, but the Alabama law does not. The reason everyone brings this up is that it shoots a hole in "abortion is murder" argument: if it is murder, you're condoning it in certain instances.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 02:55 AM
0

Not to mention if she didn't want a child, she shouldn't have put herself in a position where she might end up pregnant There are no exceptions for rape or incest. So if a father rapes his 12 year old, it's her fault, right?
/r/MensRights12/05/19 02:42 AM
25

Another article shows what she was fabricating. 6 months of fake documented injuries with witnesses among other things. At one point she dropped off her iPad at his parent's house and then reported it stolen. She was insane, and she worked for the police, and she was dating a cop. They're going to believe their own.
/r/MensRights06/04/19 02:40 PM
12

That's a reflection of reality, too, as AIDS is no longer the quick death sentence it once was. Are you claiming that Magic Johnson has been "dying from AIDS" for like 30 years?
/r/MensRights04/02/19 10:49 PM
19

Disease is the damage caused to your body - possibly from an infection. The reason for the change in naming was accuracy - you can be the carrier of an infection but not show disease symptoms. It has nothing to do with "political" correctness.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 10:06 PM
-2

First of all, I doubt that each of those writers wrote article about coal miners. Next, sincere advice for new job training has always included more nuance than just "learn to code". Finally, there is a bit of asymmetry when you have thousands of non-coal miners sending messages to a few individuals. Coordinated message campaigns to any individual out sized to their general fame is the definition of harassment.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 05:14 PM
8

A bunch of trolls started spamming "learn to code" to fired journalist. The content of the speech wasn't harassing, but when thousands of people are spamming the same comment to specific people it is still considered harassment.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 02:43 AM
-11

Not when he's claiming his "huge" victory gives him some sort of mandate. Like it or not, winning by large margins gives the candidate more momentum to accomplish their goals. Losing the popular vote means starting on a bad footing, and his approval ratings have never improved.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 03:21 PM
1

Women are much more likely to go to therapy in the first place, but in my experience, I've seen more women recommended for therapy. Maybe I'm just surrounded by crazy women, though.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 10:04 PM
2

These bad things can and do happen to men, but it can go differently. With my abusive ex-wife I thought I was in a stuck situation. She did falsely accuse me of things and even called the cops on me. I asked for and found help in my family, the police, two lawyers, and the courts. As for blaming the victim, the number one piece of advice you hear from people who got out of bad situations is "ask for help".
/r/MensRights20/11/18 03:37 PM
1

Maybe this is just my experience but no partner i've ever had has been able to be emotionally supportive. Same with friends and family actually. Apart from surface platitudes and the casual "it'll get better". This is why professional help exists. Asking for help is a good first step, but finding the right help is the next step. From personal experience, my ex wife was a terrible person to confide in. She'd make fun of me when I was sad, and would yell at me for being depressed. Get people like …
/r/MensRights20/11/18 03:10 PM
13

why don’t we here about the All American high school football jock committing suicide? We do. Depression can strike anyone. Why is it more frequently the [kid with issues] Because we expect them to have problems. Men aren’t killing themselves because of their masculinity bottling up their emotions, it’s because society rejects those who are not masculine enough, and even more so in the current feminist climate. Not every man needs to be more masculine or visa versa. There's not a one-sized-fits-…
/r/MensRights20/11/18 03:06 PM
1

It's hard to find transcripts, but the questions were asked
/r/MensRights12/10/18 11:57 PM
11

I would have loved to see the Dems attack him for that. Sadly they never mentioned it. Yes, they did.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 08:44 PM
2

What details are you referring to exactly? His multiple lies under oath.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 08:41 PM
22

Then Democrats should've higlighted his background that illustrates him as a royal stinking turd They did. For weeks before the sexual allegations. The problem is that the news really only gave heavy coverage to the sex stuff. Turns out that old court discussions and decade old emails are boring.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 08:39 PM
-1

I keep hearing "no evidence" repeated, but maybe you're confused about the definition. Testimony is a form of evidence, and there are several people confirming these stories. The doctors notes of her mentioning this are evidence, and they show she made these accusations before it was politically expedient. His yearbook and calendar are evidence, and they actually lend credence to Ford's story. As does Judge's book describing their youth. It's not some random. He knew her. She has evidence. She's…
/r/MensRights28/09/18 12:12 PM
0

You know, actual proven character defects Besides his lying on previous testimony?
/r/MensRights27/09/18 09:30 PM
6

For going to jail, sure. For a job interview... hell, if I don't like the way someone talks I won't hire them.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 09:11 PM
7

she reported that she was attacked by students “from an elitist boys’ school” who went on to become “highly respected and high-ranking members of society in Washington.” Anyone else match that description that she was childhood friends with?
/r/MensRights27/09/18 09:04 PM
10

It was in the very first articles to come out: Ford said she told no one of the incident in any detail until 2012, when she was in couples therapy with her husband. The therapist’s notes, portions of which were provided by Ford and reviewed by The Washington Post, do not mention Kavanaugh’s name but say she reported that she was attacked by students “from an elitist boys’ school” who went on to become “highly respected and high-ranking members of society in Washington.”
/r/MensRights27/09/18 09:02 PM
8

They obviously missed talking to some people. Why not investigate the new allegations?
/r/MensRights27/09/18 07:10 PM
9

so they’ll extend the full arm of the law to prove he’s innocent. So where's the investigation?
/r/MensRights27/09/18 05:34 PM
0

You're the one who came sweeping in out of nowhere deflecting from your boyfriend's deranged death wish on the president. And as a result, defended him. Replying to you is defending him? LOL, sure bud. Your thin skin, us vs. them mentality, lack of proper grammar, and casual gay mocking show you to be a perfect fit for a Trump supporter. You don't need to pretend to be a former Dem as cover. It's quite obvious. Buddy, the only misunderstanding is coming from you. Aww, you really tried though.
/r/MensRights06/06/18 01:12 PM
1

It's cute that you've still failed clear up your misunderstanding.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 09:14 PM
1

That's the headline.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 08:12 PM
1

He can do anything he wants until someone stops him. Our system of government relies on checks and balances, but also on the honesty of someone to not abuse their position. Trump's own lawyer said he could shoot someone and not be prosecuted, so what's to stop him from shooting any Senators in favor of his impeachment? Technically, there's nothing in the Constitution that says he can't, but hopefully you'll agree that wouldn't gel with the Founders' intent.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 05:01 PM
1

It's now apparently /r/mensfaintingcouch. After hearing so much about snowflakes and derision of political correctness from Trump himself, I'm surprised any of his supporters have the gall to claim offense at anything.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 04:51 PM
2

You might be a reader, but comprehension seems to be an issue. Please show me where I defended anything. I made a play on words ("Trump Derangement Syndrome" = "Trump actually being deranged" as opposed to "someone angered over Trump", get it?). You seem to be in the mindset that anyone "against" you is all part of some big team. I don't know /u/-Master-Builder-, and I don't have any real opinions on his comment. Go ahead and critique my terrible pun, but I'm not going to play "I'm offended!" wi…
/r/MensRights05/06/18 04:43 PM
7

You've attributed someone else's words to me and ignored the content of my reply. And now I am suddenly a radical? LOL. Take a break from the internet and go get some fresh air.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 02:37 PM
0

Yes, a man who thinks he can pardon himself is deranged.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 02:21 PM
27

This is why every cop should support body cams.
/r/MensRights23/05/18 04:06 PM
1

I'd agree if it weren't for belts. I don't like belts.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 10:33 PM
13

It's hard to discuss the issue without actual information. Link me to your dress code. edit: And serves them right for buying jeans with holes in them. That shit was stupid even in the 90s.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 05:31 PM
22

There are many things that guys can't wear - like hats and sleeveless shirts. When I was in school guys also had to tuck in their shirts (while girls didn't). Long hair on boys is still an issue at many schools. Add to this that guys can't wear many of the clothes that girls can (like skirts or sleeveless shirts). What standard attire of women is off limits?
/r/MensRights03/04/18 05:25 PM
52

Or Commando Day at least I call it "laundry day".
/r/MensRights03/04/18 05:21 PM
14

If you're at the beach, then wear as little as you wish. If you're in school, put on some damn clothes. It's going to be cold in there anyway.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 03:20 PM
27

I'm reminded of Dave Chappelle's bit: "All right, ladies, fine. You are not a whore. But you are wearing a whore's uniform."
/r/MensRights03/04/18 03:17 PM
9

Space Patriarchy sounds like something from some cool sci-fi.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 09:43 PM
2

As much as I agree with your comment I don't think anyone should be banned from Facebook simply for calling someone "scum", irrelevant of the gender. Facebook isn't kindergarten, they should be policing mild insults. I think it's a stupid rule, but they won't until it's applied to them. As long as the rule exists, make it fairly and strictly enforced until everyone agrees to remove it.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 09:16 PM
64

My favorite part: Facebook moderators also aren’t able to view personal or demographic information about the original poster. This means that they sometimes don’t know whether a piece of content was posted by a black queer woman or a white straight male. Why does color or sexual orientation matter? It is OK for a black queer woman to hate on other groups?
/r/MensRights04/12/17 04:21 PM
1

They're correct, but the problem may be mislabeling "willing".
/r/MensRights02/11/17 01:07 AM
3

"And when you're a star, they let you do it, you can do anything... grab them by the pussy."
/r/MensRights31/10/17 02:03 PM
1

She makes a great political distraction, which is why certain media groups and politicians can't go a day without mentioning her. Also, what does this article have to do with this sub?
/r/MensRights26/10/17 08:55 PM
17

Basically, girls will change scouts unless we stop treating girls like invalids who can't take a joke. Which is not going to happen, sadly. "You can't hit a girl" is too ingrained into our society.
/r/MensRights17/10/17 12:58 PM
3

There are more women that are parents than men (87% vs 81%), so I'm sure that's a factor.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 01:46 AM
2

Yes. Most of them have some form of this law.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 04:21 PM
33

This one is largely a Texas thing. Happens in other states as well: http://fox2now.com/2015/02/18/judge-orders-man-to-pay-30k-in-child-support-for-kid-who-is-not-his/ https://lawnewz.com/video/man-legally-forced-to-pay-child-support-even-after-dna-test-proves-hes-not-dad/ http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/okla-man-forced-pay-child-support-boy-isn-son-article-1.2946399 This is a nation wide problem.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 04:17 PM
75

From the article: He also reported that he was offered a certificate of appreciation, which he declined.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 04:33 AM
3

Record these conversations and document everything with dates and pictures. The people you talk to have supervisors, and judges will not look kindly on this kind of obstruction. If nothing else, you'll have something to show the local media. I really want you to realize this point: THIS IS YOUR CHILD'S MONEY. Your kid deserves this. Do it for them.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 03:00 PM
–

LOL. "I only chopped off their head to send a lesson. I didn't mean to kill them."
/r/MensRights11/05/17 01:34 PM
3

"Shooting someone with a gun doesn't mean you want to kill them."
/r/MensRights11/05/17 01:01 PM
84

They should be thankful that the guys are considerate enough to lift the seat.
/r/MensRights26/04/17 01:12 AM
4

Veterinarians have a dirty job, but let's be honest: most people care about their children more than pets. Obviously you're going to pay for an operation you child needs, but your dog? And that's why vets will never make the same as human doctors despite the similar schooling required.
/r/MensRights13/04/17 10:06 PM
1

At least it wasn't a ":".
/r/MensRights05/04/17 12:15 AM
8

Nice poster, but that extra comma is giving me cancer.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 08:18 PM
50

I never mentioned DUI, and none of her current charges involved that. Once again, I don't know what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 07:11 PM
44

I really don't know what you're talking about: In all, she was charged with second-degree leaving the scene of a fatal motor vehicle accident, third-degree causing death while driving with a suspended or revoked license and third-degree endangering an injured victim. So she was charged with everything I said... The sentence, imposed Thursday by Camden County Superior Court Judge Edward McBride Jr, also stipulates 20 years in prison should Hyland violate the terms of her probation. ... and it was…
/r/MensRights16/03/17 07:05 PM
105

Even if the guy purposefully committed suicide she would have a responsibility to report a corpse on her car. She failed to do so because she was already breaking the law.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 05:33 PM
300

She killed a person while driving on a suspended license and then conspired to cover it up. I'd argue that's worthy of jail time.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 05:07 PM
5

Or a Vegan, a CrossFitter, a Linux user... Really there is a line between a (blank) enthusiast and a (blank) lifestyle. Lifestyle changes aren't always healthy. In my opinion it comes down to whether you can take criticism without offense.
/r/MensRights09/03/17 01:43 AM
3

Show me some feminist play that shows a rape of a woman by a man in a positive light and I'll concede the point.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 08:36 PM
3

That's kind of a cheap dodge there. If I wrote a book about Hitler's positive contributions to society I'd be attacked from all angles. The Lolita character is portrayed in a negative light. If it was a 13 year old girl talking about a positive sexual experience with a 20-something year old man, would you still say it is just the author's perspective and that there is nothing wrong with it?
/r/MensRights21/02/17 07:51 PM
7

Glad you're not apparently affected, but hopefully you can agree that promoting sex with 13 year olds isn't good?
/r/MensRights21/02/17 04:47 PM
41

It doesn't promote any kind of rape The line in the play is: "... if it was rape, it was a good rape" when talking about statutory rape of a 13 year old. How do you reconcile this fact and your position?
/r/MensRights21/02/17 12:52 PM
1

Yeah, I had a similar job at a similar restaurant. Guys restroom? Faint smell of piss. Women's restroom? Smells like the beach in Galveston.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 11:26 PM
9

It might matter if women's sports were popular.
/r/MensRights14/02/17 03:04 AM
2

https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/bitstream/handle/10012/6958/Yeung_Amy.pdf
/r/MensRights20/01/17 04:11 PM
1

4 links to tvtropes.org? Dude, you might be the villain. You could kill thousands of productive man-hours with this single post.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 08:29 PM
3

Yeah, the Kanye joke... you aren't Dave Chappelle, man.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 08:23 PM
22

Having worked in a few places that were mostly staffed by women, I can say that "toxic femininity" is a thing as well. I wonder how many programs there are to fight that...
/r/MensRights04/01/17 07:51 PM
12

I do all of that and work full time as a single father. So do many men, but you won't see articles written about us complaining... it called being a responsible adult. Hopefully most people aren't overly burdened by remembering to fucking buy toilet paper.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 07:47 PM
7

It's not about catering to white men, it's about catering to everyone equally. That's not happening at the moment.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 10:05 PM
3

Video record all medical examinations. So having them naked on camera is going to solve problems and not cause more? I think this is why many doctors require a nurse to be present at all times.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 01:43 AM
39

Shaming is a thing women do to each other. I'd say more so than men.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 05:13 PM
34

Every time you give them money call it "patriarchy money" and tell them they are complicit in it.
/r/MensRights12/11/16 08:04 PM
2

What was the crime? Missing emails. Where do you think Hillary got the idea for a private server? The problem is she did a crappy job and got hacked because she hired a real professional that asked for help on reddit.
/r/MensRights10/11/16 02:49 AM
3

You assume there is only one alternative. I voted for a 3rd party candidate.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 05:58 PM
2

She's putting you in a catch-22: if you call the police, then you're "not a man". If you acted "like a man" and beat her, then you'd be in jail. Basically her definition of "being a man" will be whatever fits her narrative. Don't fall for it. Be a real man and don't let it affect you and don't let her define you. By her logic she wasn't acting like a woman, so you're under no obligation to uphold some imagined gender bargain. And a note from experience: record any interaction you have with her f…
/r/MensRights08/11/16 03:15 AM
10

A fool and their money are soon parted. I can't blame these dirty rotten scoundrels for their creativity.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 01:10 AM
3

I'd rather vote for someone than against someone.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 07:15 PM
5

Voting for one of two bad choices just encourages more of the same for the next election. Don't throw your vote away: vote 3rd party.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 03:54 PM
2

And that's fucked up. They should have counselors for the first part, and independent investigations for the other part. The problem is currently most people are confusing compassion for justice.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 07:39 PM
1

Yes, but I'm not really in a position to act on any of this. My point was that of course you should comfort someone in need without question, but when seeking justice you have to be objective.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 06:02 PM
1

Here's how I look at it: If someone claims they were raped, I'm going to believe them and give them help in whatever way I can. But if he/she says, "I want the person to be punished", then we need to examine the facts and hear the other person's side.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 05:31 PM
7

This is part of their strategy from last season: how do you make fun of someone without being labeled racist and misogynist? Make them white males! So they had white "frat boys" spouting actual lines from BLM protestors. I suspect they'll be doing the same to mock feminist: turn them into white males and then show how stupid their message is.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 01:22 PM
-1

Define legitimate.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 03:40 AM
-1

Seriously, man. Fuck off. I'm still waiting on that concession and apology you promised.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 03:32 AM
0

I know what I said, and you know exactly what it meant. I really don't think you do. And you've proven that. Insulting me isn't going to change anything. That last comment wasn't an insult as much as a statement of truth. I'm sure I've insulted you elsewhere, but I believe you were the one who broke decorum when you lost the argument and said "Fuck you" as a response.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 03:18 AM
0

You said: Go ahead and find any example of "wage gap" referring to anything other than the gender "wage gap" and I'll not only concede, but apologize. I found 3 different ones. They said wage gap without referring to gender. What a sad little man you are. What's really great is I know you can't stop.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 03:10 AM
0

I never said it was. I quoted you in the above comment saying it was about "inequality of races". LOL, OK. I never summarized the article - I paraphrased the specific excerpts Come on, dude. This is about the level of my 9 year old playing the "no, I'm not!" game. Considering that this all started with a false semantic argument on your part I'm the one playing semantic games? Is that how you'd summarize paraphrase specific excerpts? (claiming that wage and earnings mean the same thing) I said th…
/r/MensRights04/10/16 12:43 AM
1

That's not been the case in my experience. OK, I'll change that to something you'll hopefully agree with: people who like to claim they're smart are more susceptible to semantic arguments. That fight has an agenda. And that's different from the "Wage Gap" argument how? That's why you can't argue the wage gap numbers. The sources they will cite - like this one - will all show the same thing. And that's the why I say stay away from "definition" arguments: it leads away from the truth. You can't re…
/r/MensRights03/10/16 09:32 PM
0

Yeah, they used it in the title, to say that the income inequality of races is not a wage gap. The article isn't even about racism. You're so wrong you even summarized it incorrectly. And even then she still used the phrase in the manner you said no one else used. Like it or not it is a general phrase (another example here... I can do this all day... just search "wage gap -gender" Did you not realize google is a thing?). You must be a pretty miserable person in real life if this is your idea of …
/r/MensRights03/10/16 08:35 PM
0

Smart people are the most susceptible to semantic fights (see the fight over the useless redefinition of racism), but you can short circuit that by going straight to the methodology and numbers. You can argue definitions (because English is inexact vague imprecise on a good day), but you can't argue numbers.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 08:23 PM
0

they're quoting the way other people allegedly use the phase. So the writer is not using the phrase, but others are... even though she uses the phrase in the headline. I've seen feminist logic less transparent. And they're literally saying it's not a wage gap. LOL. Bravo, you've used the phrase in a sentence and claimed it is not a phrase. If I claimed "it's not a giraffe" it wouldn't mean that I didn't think giraffes were a thing. I'll take that stretch of logic to be the closest thing to an ap…
/r/MensRights03/10/16 08:13 PM
0

Keep on shift those goal post. Here it is without clarification or mentions of gender. I await your concession and apology (but knowing your honor-less character, I'm sure you'll weasel your way out of keeping your word again).
/r/MensRights03/10/16 07:59 PM
0

LOL. You and your semantic games. It's too bad that you're a sore loser. The article contains: After the passage of the act, the wage gap for minority groups narrowed without the descriptor. I await your concession and apology. edit: Here's another: http://www.cof.org/blogs/re-philanthropy/2016-07-16/its-not-wage-gap-its-poverty-and-its-why-us-needs-development Not mention of gender or use of adjectives. I'll take two apologies.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 07:50 PM
0

Go ahead and find any example of "wage gap" referring to anything other than the gender "wage gap" and I'll not only concede, but apologize. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_wage_gap_in_the_United_States I await your apology. That is, if you're not too busy sulking about having your irrelevant comments downvoted. There are two types of redditors: those who will argue with passion and an open mind, and people like you that want to "win the internet". A good sign of the latter is a downvote on…
/r/MensRights03/10/16 07:44 PM
-1

I agree with you, but if you have to explain your argument then you just should put that explanation in the argument. So don't correct the definition of "wage" vs. "earnings" and just state it outright: "those numbers don't take into account hours worked or experience".
/r/MensRights03/10/16 07:33 PM
-1

It's not "playing semantics" when you keep misusing words. You just tried to define gap as something other than "difference". That's not reasonable. All these semantic games got you nowhere but pissed off. Words have different means, but numbers are absolute. Just say "equal hours and experience" as there is no way to reasonably misinterpret that. Fuck off. Wow, rude because you set yourself up? I'm done pretending you're a reasonable person. You cussed over a definition. That's unreasonable. Ca…
/r/MensRights03/10/16 07:28 PM
-1

Now look who's playing semantics! LOL. You keep on proving my point.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 07:20 PM
-1

But that's illegal now. There is no wage gap now. It is perfectly legal to pay a lower wage to someone with less experience. So, yes, there is a wage gap and it is due to experience. Thanks for helping prove my point again. Only with people like you who refuse to understand. I understand, and I've stated that even though you continue to frame this otherwise. 95% of other people will not, and in 10 years the term will still be "wage gap". edit: And thanks for those petty downvotes. It really show…
/r/MensRights03/10/16 07:16 PM
0

The phrase "Wage Gap" is decades old, so you're fighting a losing battle by arguing over wording. Get straight to the meat of the argument: it doesn't address hours worked or experience. Saying that immediately taps into people's ideas of fairness instead of a knee-jerk reaction over definitions. Like I said, I agree with you and think you're right (despite you claiming I'm obfuscating to prove I'm right). I just think there are better ways to argue the point to others. And keep on downvoting me…
/r/MensRights03/10/16 06:46 PM
0

My point was and has been: Fighting over definitions is a losing battle. That's in my first comment. And the fact that you're so worked up about it proves my point. It is a distraction that causes the discussion to be derailed and people to get upset.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 06:35 PM
0

Conversational definitions aren't applicable when we're talking about the financial/accounting definitions of the words. I agree with you, but that doesn't matter. Let me demonstrate: Person 1: Women earn 77% of what men do! Person 2: The wage gap is a myth! What they were actually measuring was an earnings gap, because the numbers are meant to represent the lifetime amount that a person makes throughout their career. Person 2 is confrontation and confusing. Many would walk away still thinking w…
/r/MensRights03/10/16 06:17 PM
-6

Wage is not the same as earnings though. They are synonyms, so they are often used interchangeably. What you said is true for certain definitions, but is not true in every case or in every day usage. And that's my point: once you start arguing about wording you're off topic, and you've distracted from your own stance. Wage is the rate at which you earn pay, while earnings is the overall total made in a specified amount of time. Units vs. units per time? Humans confuse the two all of the time. If…
/r/MensRights03/10/16 06:05 PM
-17

Wage is a synonym of earnings. Fighting over definitions of words is a losing battle. Explain the reasons behind the numbers and stop trying to fit explanations on a bumper sticker.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 05:12 PM
7

Some of my best and most memorable teachers were men. Boys need a male role models, and since my dad died when I was young male teachers helped fill that role. Thanks for doing what you do.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 01:06 PM
42

There's no reason for a diverse cast when your setting was a hick town in Colorado. As the show became more of a commentary on society in general, the show has become a bit more diverse out of necessity. I just love the way they take everything too literally on their show: the black kid is literally Token, and a Giant Douche and a Turd Sandwich are running for office.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 08:06 PM
3

I'm telling you that it isn't a gap, in the same way that there is not a "pay gap" between a physician and a retail store employee. They make different amounts, so there is a gap. Trying to change the definitions or playing with the words is a useless endeavor. When people say "wage gap myth", they mean "the myth that the gap in pay is due to overt sexism". If the work isn't equal the pay won't be equal. This isn't a pay gap. Like I said, wordplay is just going to get you in trouble. The word "g…
/r/MensRights28/09/16 01:59 AM
4

I think you just misinterpreted the quote. Here it is again: According to the latest Census income report, full-time, year-round working women earned 80 percent of what men earned in 2015. Lots of factors go into that wage gap, including hours and jobs worked, as well as interruptions in women’s careers due to maternity. It didn't say or imply that 20% is the "corrected" figure. It didn't even say that part of the 20% was due to sexism. You should be applauding their effort here.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 01:46 AM
2

That says there is a gap, and explains the reasons why. Just like NPR did. I don't see the problem.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 12:34 AM
-3

I didn't advocate for that.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 09:59 PM
0

No, it isn't.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 09:58 PM
-8

If the mother refuses to disclose or pretends that she doesn't know... then no support from anyone. That punishes the child for their mom's actions.
/r/MensRights24/09/16 05:04 PM
2

Natural disasters on the news. When a tornado goes through a normal neighborhood you get some trees knocked over and a few roofs damaged. That will get reported on the local news. If it hits a trailer park, there will be massive destruction and debris spread over a large area... which makes great helicopter footage and will end up on the national news along with the inevitable deaths from people living in fragile structures.
/r/MensRights13/09/16 08:32 PM
15

As a single father with custody of my kid dealing with a loser of an ex wife: why not make that message gender neutral?
/r/MensRights11/09/16 05:06 AM
8

I'm not going to vote against someone because I no longer wish to perpetuate this terrible two party system. I'm voting for Gary Johnson.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 09:27 PM
2

I can't find any other sources and this looks like something out of the onion. I'm calling shenanigans until I see another source.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 02:20 AM
2

It's an archive site so as not to support the original with hits and ad revenue.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 12:58 AM
3

I'd be afraid of the possible ridicule I'd receive if I walked into any class at my UNI and said that the pay gap doesn't exist. I'd ridicule you here. There is obviously a gap. The issue is whether sexism is involved in this gap.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 02:35 AM
27

How is she going to show the world if they can't look?
/r/MensRights04/08/16 01:44 AM
2

I've got to say I have more respect for Nancy Pelosi after reading this article.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 05:13 AM
12

It's not their fault: it's the Patriarchy that makes them live in their matriarch's basement.
/r/MensRights17/07/16 05:43 PM
0

go away troll... are you so bored that you need to make up reasons to argue with people on the internet? I could literally write this back to you and make more sense. I've stated facts, you've given a petty downvote and spouted provably wrong statements. we're talking about the same shit, you just insist on using terminology that nearly nobody else is using to describe it for what reason? I'm not using complex terminology. I'm actually trying to dumb down my words. I'm sorry I didn't try hard en…
/r/MensRights12/07/16 04:01 AM
0

Let's switch gears. Here on page 5 shows men and women make different amounts. This is a gap in pay. So the wage gap exists. If you think different, then show me proof. I'll be waiting patiently. Now where you're confused is that THAT ISN'T THE DEBATE. The debate is about unequal pay for equal work. The myth is that they controlled the studies for other variables. Maybe this goes a bit over your head. You can't take this complicated debate and paraphrase "wage gap is a myth" because you've omitt…
/r/MensRights12/07/16 03:48 AM
0

The wording is wrong. The wage gap is not a myth. Go listen to the CHS video mentioned elsewhere in this thread. She is very specific in her wording: "... that women earn 23 cents less than men for doing the same work." and No competent economist takes the 23 cent wage gap injustice seriously. and The "so called" wage gap is a product of the different choices men and women make. She never says "wage gap myth". She goes into the reasons for the gap that does exists. Wording is important unless yo…
/r/MensRights12/07/16 03:22 AM
0

wage is referring to hourly wages and earnings is referring to lifetime earnings, or possibly yearly earnings depending on what particular myth you are debunking at the moment. Wage can refer to an hourly rate or a salary. Either way, men earn a higher wage and higher over a lifetime (and for mostly the same reasons), so it is a difference without a distinction. playing your little word game semantics to confuse the issue doesn't help at all. I'm not playing word games, and I'm trying to "un-con…
/r/MensRights12/07/16 01:05 AM
0

Wage and earnings are synonyms, so these phrases mean the same thing. When people say "the wage gap is a myth" they usually mean "it is false that men make more than women for the same job due to discrimination." But that phrase doesn't fit on a bumper sticker and needs detailed explanation, and people take the meaning at face value and then dismiss it as obviously false (because obviously men on average make more than women). Be careful with your phrasing and be sure on what they mean or you wo…
/r/MensRights11/07/16 11:32 PM
2

I'm not offended. I'm just trying to explain. Sorry if I came off rude. Basically my advice is to get her to show that these academic papers prove discrimination. They prove a gap, but they can't prove the cause of the gap. If she makes the positive claim (i.e. discrimination is the cause), then the burden of proof is on her. If you made the negative claim (i.e. it is not discrimination), then it is a high hill to climb.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 08:07 PM
1

So that means that if someone does find discrimination then there is a wage gap? If there was discrimination, how would there not be a gap? There's a lot of evidence that it's a myth. There is evidence that "unequal pay for equal work" is a myth. You seem to be confused on the difference between a wage gap and actual discrimination. Just because there is a gap in pay doesn't mean this is due to evil forces. ... the simple fact is: (money made by men)/(number of men) > (money made by women)/(numb…
/r/MensRights11/07/16 07:49 PM
1

The "wage gap" isn't a myth in that statistics show the average woman is paid less than the average man. But that's a meaningless figure. The important thing is why, and no one has been able to positively show that this is due to discrimination. You can't prove a negative (I can't prove there are no unicorns), and the burden of proof is on her.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 07:02 PM
6

Sounds like you've already convinced yourself you'd be better off alone but you just won't admit it.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 06:23 AM
1

Not in the United States. That was changed with Obamacare. Men still pay more for car insurance though.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 04:02 PM
6

You're more likely to be killed by a man and you're more likely to be saved by one (like a cop, firefighter, EMS, etc.). Men are just more likely to be CEOs and homeless, geniuses and mentally handicapped. Only pointing out one end of the spectrum misses the entire picture.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 06:33 PM
2

If you think I misunderstood this, please cite the applicable law. I remember this law because of this case where a man shot a Craiglist girl and was acquitted because it was a nighttime robbery. I'm also a Texan.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 04:53 AM
1

Any time you hear the word misogyny just mentally replace it with "blasphemy".
/r/MensRights13/06/16 09:22 PM
5

In Texas, if I'm not mistaken, you have the legal right to kill in order to retrieve your stolen property. Only if it is nighttime.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 09:20 PM
6

The feds have issued their latest rounds of interpretations of Title IX. Basically they are writing what they think the law means, but each interpretation brings a new set of rules the schools must follow. All of this is without any oversight by any legislative or judicial body. Usually this "rule making" is done by a specialized body with multiple checks (see the DCMA's rule making with the LOC every few years). Because they are conjuring up new rules based on nothing at this point "divining" i…
/r/MensRights10/06/16 06:29 PM
6

Does someone need to make a Venn Diagram for them to explain why this is discriminatory? edit: Claim to be persecuted for your skin color and then let them proceed to do so.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 03:09 PM
33

Remember: Hillary took money from the private prison industry, so she probably has little desire for actual reform.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 03:01 PM
1

They were the lowest figures in the article, so I'd assume they are probably higher than that. Of course the lower figures will be the ones they cite.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 03:25 PM
1

There is a broken link at the bottom. I should note that these are probably one of the weakest sources listed in the article I linked.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 01:52 PM
0

From wikipedia: FBI reports from 1996 consistently put the number of "unfounded" rape accusations around 8%. In contrast, the average rate of unfounded reports for "Index crimes" tracked by the FBI is 2%.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 05:11 AM
31

They've managed to be sexist against both men and women. They've basically assumed men are rapist and that females are incapable of making informed decisions.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 11:20 PM
6

I like to imagine myself as an Italian plumber or a fast moving hedgehog for the best immersion. I'm lucky there are games that cater to my identity.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 11:12 PM
1

You can customize you avatar with clothes, but you can't change your body (... just like real life).
/r/MensRights18/04/16 11:10 PM
1

I had read that the idea for the game came from a 4chan thread about a game that would allow a race war with everyone randomly assigned a race.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 11:09 PM
0

It randomizes lots of things (NSFW). Calm your tits, guys. I think it is hilarious that they don't let you change your avatar.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 11:03 PM
6

My Alma Mater has 58,000 students. Approximately half are female. For the one in four stat to work out over 4 years, it would mean a quarter of the 1/5 are assaulted each year, and with 365 days we end up with: 58000*.5*.2*.25*1/365=3.97 So for the stat to be true, almost 4 new women would need to be assaulted every day of the year.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 01:13 PM
3

Misandry don't real Do I even need to go into why this is wrong? Well, to start with: that grammar is terrible.
/r/MensRights04/04/16 11:50 AM
4

That's the saddest part of that whole water issue: this problem is not going away. Even once they switch to unleaded water, problems will linger for a generation.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 04:56 PM
9

I think they also attributed the drop in crime to lead paint bans (starting in 1978). Fewer kids with lead addled brains means a drop in crime.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 03:25 PM
6

I know my life has been better since my divorce. Not waking up to someone yelling at you every morning is a great way to start the day.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 01:13 AM
2

In the much of the public sphere, MRA and KKK are equally valid. Well, this submission and its upvotes aren't going to help that perception.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 02:55 PM
4

Broken clocks are sometimes right, but I wouldn't keep checking throughout the day just to make sure. Which is why I don't research the validity of everything the KKK says.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 12:22 PM
4

It's like they've never heard of supply vs. demand.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 05:23 PM
2

And yes, the boys get their shots. No circumcision on this one. Glad to hear it. You sound like a good dad, so keep up the good work.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 04:24 PM
1

I was exaggerating for comedic effect, but damn I guess I was spot on. I wasn't talking about the "pot smoking commune living" hippie but the new "suburban woman trendy" hippie. At least tell me you're vaccinating...
/r/MensRights18/03/16 04:16 PM
1

If she had the option, she'd want to do water birth AKA birthing soup. I'd rather have a nice sterile hospital bed than some bath water mixed with everything (and I mean everything) coming out of her end. If you want to be a hippie and do cloth diapers, hemp lotion, and eat your placenta then far out. But never go full hippie and do the water birth.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 03:54 PM
14

Birthing is a high stress and very dangerous thing. It used to be the number one killer of women. If a doctor needs to do something to save two lives, they are going to do it. It is really a catch 22: if they follow the word of the person whose mind is being altered by a flood of hormones, pain, panic, and dropping blood pressure against their professional judgement, they can be sued. If they don't, they can still be sued.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 03:50 PM
3

Who run the world?[sic] Master Blaster
/r/MensRights08/03/16 10:01 PM
7

It requires a total re-evaluation of how we do things socially. How we shame people for unusual interests. Disclaimer: this is completely anecdotal. That being said, I chose programmer as a profession when I was in high school taking computer science, so I have around 20 years of insight. In this time, I've never seen any man do anything but encourage girls with computers. Teachers and professors (some of them female) always nicely answered their questions and encouraged them. Fellow students di…
/r/MensRights08/03/16 04:52 AM
2

He tried to claim it was a kosher killing. They brought in a rabbi to explain that there is no kosher killing of a dog (especially if you're pissing on it, I'd assume). She showed remorse, and he doubled down.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 05:12 PM
1

I already did that... 1/5 = .2 and .2 /5 = .05 which is the number I used.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 07:42 PM
4

You're right, and according to this the gender breakdown is 48.6% female with 61,263 students (I'm assuming this also counts graduate students).
/r/MensRights16/02/16 06:35 PM
87

Taking my (mentioned in the link) alma mater, if one in five were true, then 50,000 * .05 / 365 = 6.8 there would be almost 7 rapes a day. EVERY DAY. That's just not accurate. edit: as pointed out by /u/realsbeforefeels, we'd multiply that number by 0.486. That still assumes multiple rapes a day.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 01:29 PM
3

A simple note from the doctor will obviously suffice - I wasn't suggesting otherwise.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 05:06 PM
2

Even when you're dealing with people who are trained in medical terminology and the term's implications, if you don't play it up a bit, you will get no attention. Concentrating on the effects of the conditions rather than the cause is important. Even with cancer and strokes there are different severities. You can have a small stroke and be fine the next day or be confined to a wheelchair for life. Just listing diseases is useless.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 02:23 PM
3

Vertigo sounds like a weak ass excuse of a disability. As I said before, just because you're ignorant of what vertigo is doesn't mean it isn't serious. How "scary" a disease sounds is a silly measurement at best. My grandfather suffered from vertigo due to complications of his WWII injuries (he also had a metal plate in his head), and no one thought it wasn't a serious condition. That's what he needs to convince a family court that his disability is serious. That is the job of his doctors, and t…
/r/MensRights12/02/16 02:19 PM
13

I'm sure it is, but it doesn't sound serious. Your ignorance of the condition does not diminish it. While it is not a scary sounding word like "cancer", it is a devastating condition for those who suffer from it. For those who know what it is, the word certainly carries "gravitas".
/r/MensRights12/02/16 01:59 PM
5

You might be able to sue for alimony, considering that she's been the breadwinner but in Texas I'm somewhat skeptical of that. Texas doesn't do alimony for marriages less than 10 years. edit: Outside of certain other factors of which serious medical needs are one.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 01:55 PM
6

Vertigo is a serious condition. I had an episode that left me unable to drive for weeks, and for a couple of days all I did was lay down with my eyes closed and throw up.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 01:25 PM
2

and the last nail in the coffin of her career Just admit that you wanted to use "nail in" and Palin in the same sentence.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 05:30 AM
2

And in recent news a Chinese company invested in Grindr.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 04:57 AM
-1

What SHOULD happen is the police should be pressing charges against her. Sadly, that didn't happen, for no real reason. The victim decided to accept money instead of having her arrested. I think it was a bad decision, but the guy is an Uber driver so he probably values money more than revenge. That was some drunken public disturbance, but we didn't see what lead up to it or what happened when the cops arrived, so we don't know why the cops made the decisions they did. What the hell are you talki…
/r/MensRights22/01/16 05:27 AM
-1

Except that I never posted her info online. So you think it should happen, but you're too scared to do it yourself?
/r/MensRights22/01/16 04:31 AM
-1

LOL, go at it keyboard warrior: bring the social justice to that woman via posting her information online! You're our last hope!
/r/MensRights22/01/16 02:41 AM
-1

Now explain to me what that has to do with people posting her information on the internet.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 02:20 AM
1

I agree 100%. It is a shame that she wasn't subjected to the legal system, but that is the price we pay for living in a society. Similarly I think OJ should have been found guilty, but I still think we should stay within the system and accept the verdict.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 12:04 AM
1

I love playing devil's advocate as it challenges even my own preconceptions. In this case it seems I should have hired some demonic legal assistants. Thanks for kind words and level-headed reply.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 12:01 AM
1

I share your sentiment (though you might be under the mistaken impression I'm defending her), but mob justice isn't a substitute for the real thing.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 11:54 PM
-1

That's good that you can control yourself, but that has nothing to do with siccing the internet on her.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 09:52 PM
1

Fixing the legal system - not picking up pitchforks. Working outside the legal system leads to trouble. See the college kangaroo courts this subreddit has been complaining about.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 09:23 PM
2

Luckily I've never done anything stupid enough that people started recording me.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 06:40 PM
-2

for every chick like this there's twenty more who pulled the same shit and no one will ever hear about it. It's like a bad luck lottery that you can't opt out of. Kind of my point: uneven justice isn't really justice. Which is why I agree that this was female privileged in action. Honest question: if it were a dude doing this, and he were arrested and charged with assault (which led to say, six months in jail), would you be arguing on his behalf that it's unfair he be punished so harshly? If it …
/r/MensRights21/01/16 06:32 PM
-3

Well, first of all this isn't internet vigilantism. She did this to herself. She ain't no saint, but "she did this to herself" is a bad sentiment. Thousands of people posting her personal information online is internet vigilantism no matter how you slice it. I've already said she deserves punishment, but not in the form of 4chan. if she does lose it, it will likely not be because of internet vigilantism - it will be because they have rules and regulations and she broke them. Or it could be becau…
/r/MensRights21/01/16 06:26 PM
-1

I'm not attacking you. I'm saying I don't think you can judge what is her normal behavior from a one minute clip. But many people think they can, and that leads to people taking it upon themselves to see that justice is done (as you've scolded other for doing in link). I would hope that this isn't anyone's normal behavior, and seeing as how she survived getting into med school I kind of doubt this is her normal self.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 06:07 PM
-3

What she did is inexcusable. Normal people don't act like this. But literally the only point I've been making is that the internet shouldn't be the judge and jury here.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 06:03 PM
-6

That could be the case, but the only evidence we have of anything is a single video. I'd rather she goes through the legal system than the court of public opinion because there have been far too many cases of men and women wrongfully persecuted. But go ahead and start posting her facebook page if you think that's a positive thing.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 05:42 PM
-11

I understand the woman acted like a stupid bitch. I don't know if I would have had the patience the man in the video afforded her. I think he should have taken her money and then still pressed charges. But I've seen men and women's lives ruined by internet mobs. They don't know boundaries and they don't know real justice. And while I respect your opinion on her character, I'm strongly of the opinion that you can't judge a person's entire life by one video. She could be suffering a mental break. …
/r/MensRights21/01/16 05:35 PM
-21

I'll defer to your amazing ability to judge one's sobriety and infer their baseline behavior by merely watching a short vertical video.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 05:25 PM
-30

The one on her medical page was about a breakthrough in their department, she was just listed as one of the doctors that helped. And this is why "internet justice" isn't a good thing. A successful researcher gets too drunk one night (we have no proof there is a pattern of her craziness) and suddenly her life is ruined. I'm all for holding people accountable, but real justice is through the legal system - not internet vigilantism.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 04:56 PM
50

Her identity has been spread online. The video has already been deleted from /r/videos a couple of times because people keep posting links to her personal information. She was a med student, and anyone who googles her name will see this video. She's fucked.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 04:06 PM
2

You can use a Kinnect in a pitch black environment because it actually projects a depth finding laser pattern.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 05:31 PM
3

I remember one camera manufacturer getting shit because it had blink detection that kept thinking Asian people had closed eyes.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 05:28 PM
13

In 2008 in the United States there were more male prison sexual assaults than all female sexual assaults.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 03:51 AM
2

Where's Dave Chappelle when we need him?
/r/MensRights23/12/15 08:07 AM
12

I looking forward to this. Have you actually read any quotes from her? Every time she opens her mouth something even more ridiculous comes out. This should be entertaining.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 02:06 AM
3

I usually withhold judgement until enough evidence is out to make an informed decision and I don't always agree with courts. For example: OJ was guilty.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 06:24 AM
16

Pretty much the only people not being hated on in any effective way are the plutocrats. So the system is working as they intended...
/r/MensRights15/12/15 01:03 AM
1

Some are just more equal than others.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 02:23 PM
3

Brendan Eich made a political donation. This woman openly called for physical assault, and the camera operator was physically assaulted. I think there is a difference between free speech and an actual crime.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 05:28 PM
8

But I see no reason shy he shouldn't have just stepped back a few feet. He would have just stepped around them, but they were blocking him on purpose. You don't need to be up in someone's face to take a picture. But you do need to be close to the subject in order to film it, and they were blocking his access and being quite rude about it.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 05:06 AM
12

They were apparently asking him to move back with the rest of the media Did you miss the part where they moved forward pushing him on purpose?
/r/MensRights10/11/15 04:23 AM
9

I think the most widely used OS is probably ITRON, an embedded real time kernel. I'm sure my toaster even has an OS at this point, but thanks for pedantically pointing out the truth.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 07:19 PM
114

He started and oversees the most widely used operating system in the world and gives it away for free, so if anyone can be arrogant it is this guy.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 03:27 PM
5

There is a post up on /r/entertainment that has had a link to the picture in the comments for over a day. If it was JLaw, the user would have been quickly banned.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 03:28 PM
5

4chan account? Let me take a guess at his user name...
/r/MensRights02/10/15 12:30 AM
12

Get rid of the draft as it is unneeded. Stop getting into unnecessary wars. Double down on robotic research.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 06:54 PM
1

The article, though badly worded, it is correct. The headline is wrong.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 05:41 PM
19

You won't see prominent feminist give a reply to the women you mentioned. It is part of the strategy: stay on the soap box and dismiss criticism as harassment by radicals.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 05:27 PM
1

I graduated with a computer science degree a decade ago. Even the few languages popular then and still in use today have dramatically changed so much that you'd need to practically relearn them (or at least unlearn the depricated methods).
/r/MensRights21/09/15 12:30 AM
18

Computer Science is a fast moving field. Without access to things like reddit or tech blogs you'd have trouble staying on top of the current state of the art.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 05:19 PM
4

This will never get anywhere near a jury. They are charging him with a felony and they'll make a plea bargain he can't refuse.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 11:52 AM
7

Well, to be fair men are overwhelmingly the perpetrators of murder in the US. And mass shootings are committed almost without exception by men. Men also account for most people who run for office, most entrepreneurs, most science breakthroughs, most Nobel prizes... The point is men do more exceptional things both good and bad. If you want to get rid of one end of the spectrum, the other will disappear as well.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 10:31 PM
2

I'm sure they're buying it for the articles.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 01:57 AM
6

Society will never do this because of the cost of to society: public assistance would have to pick up the tab.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 08:28 PM
13

They are not enforced the same, and that is a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 10:08 PM
6

She's claiming you by making you unattractive to other females.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 01:45 AM
3

She asked, she didn't sue. She blackmailed him by threatening to release a book if he didn't pay her.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 06:26 PM
17

She claims that you can only be prejudice towards men, just like you can't be racist towards white people. If these were her exact words, she is getting her definition wrong. According to modern Sociological theory, you can be prejudiced against anyone but institutional racism is only prejudice plus power (which doesn't really happen to white people in the . They drop the "institutional" part in common discourse. This has lead to people like your coworker using the definition wrong.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 07:10 PM
4

Sure, there are things I can do. Are they worth the hassle, fights, or stress to my kid?
/r/MensRights16/07/15 04:21 PM
21

So you've met my ex? Divorced last year, 50/50 custody. I had him most of the summer and paid for day "summer camp" during the week while I worked. She is unemployed again, and has no money. She asked me to pay her instead of the day camp... Why would I pay her to watch her own fucking kid?
/r/MensRights16/07/15 01:41 AM
2

We already have enough Californians coming over here.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 11:59 PM
1

Hormones are given to all women to increase the chances of the egg implanting. They are daily and quite painful. This is why it is odd that her wife wouldn't know about it. Sorry for the earlier sarcasm.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 11:57 PM
1

Sounds like that could cause problems conceiving, but I'm no expert.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 09:50 PM
1

Is there another reason for in vitro?
/r/MensRights15/07/15 09:11 PM
1

My sister did in vitro, and it is a quite involved process requiring many hormone shots. She would have a hard time not knowing about it.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 08:32 PM
3

In Texas there is no alimony if the marriage lasted less than 10.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 08:30 PM
2

They are authoritarian as opposed to libertarian. This is on a different spectrum than the liberal/conservative dimension. I'm left libertarian and these people disgust me.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 07:09 PM
43

Alimony and child support for both genders has guaranteed single parents income and support for their children, even in hard economic times or when divorce upends personal finances It's quite hard to take anyone seriously who list this as something that has helped men when this is one of the biggest problems men face and feminist groups have argued against reform.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 03:39 PM
18

The article quotes one girl as saying: “It’s my body, my choice. I can wear what I want. This is exemplifying how it’s a crime scene […] regarding people as a crime scene? That’s f*cked up.” But her actual quote (transcribed by someone in another thread) is: "It's my body it's my choice I can wear what I want. And, it shouldn- this is exemplifying how it's a crime scene, like - wearing the caution tape that they - would normally put around a physically crime scene with- when it's no- rea- regard…
/r/MensRights14/06/15 03:54 PM
4

Relevant xkcd.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 05:03 PM
8

From the article: But though subsequent surveys have come up with variations on Koss's original statistic—the consensus is now that it's one-in-five women, not one-in-four Hasn't the 1 in 4 myth been thoroughly debunked?
/r/MensRights03/06/15 04:49 PM
5

The fact that the accuser behaved normally after the event does not prove innocence. Nothing could prove it except a video tape of the event. But in a he said/she said case you at least have to take into account what she said after the event. What other evidence is there? Here is a great article on the subject title.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 01:36 AM
1

Seriously, all this dick chopping wasn't in the books (Varys being the exception), but you don't see people complaining about the constant cock cutting.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 02:20 AM
8

People getting killed? No problem. People getting tortured and then killed? No problem. People getting raped? They still have no problem. Pregnant woman stabbed to death in belly? No big deal. Multiple men sexually mutilated? No problem. Gay men tortured for their sexuality? No problem. Popular cute girl gets raped? OMG BOYCOTT GAME OF THRONES!!!11 Seriously, there have been multiple depictions of rape. Sansa herself was about 10 seconds away from being raped in earlier in the show. The first ep…
/r/MensRights18/05/15 11:12 PM
18

Some people are just more equal than others.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 02:06 AM
3

I'm already full from eating babies while visiting /r/atheism.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 08:27 PM
2

Maybe that's why this concept is so foreign to me. The last time I even remember seeing this behavior was during spring break on South Padre island with a bunch of obviously drunken teenagers. I live in a college town and just never see or hear of anyone doing this. I've always just assumed that "harassed" just meant "men talking to them." I guess I just live in a nice area. Are your experiences different?
/r/MensRights06/05/15 11:32 PM
3

But, when discussing things like getting harassed in the street with my male friends, many are shocked at how often it happens. It honestly must be the place you live. My ex wife was never harassed. Neither are my sisters. Neither are friends. Hit on? Yes. Harassed and cat-called? No. I just never see this happening where I'm from.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 09:49 PM
17

If he has no custody and is barred from seeing them, then he is not a legal guardian and therefore should not be punished.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 07:55 PM
8

This was best illustrated when there was a wiki article created about Wikipedia kicking off many feminist leaning editors. Except they didn't, but a news article said they did and trying to prove it by citing the Wikipedia ArbCom page would have been "original research". Here's an article about the incident.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 05:54 PM
13

"Someone on the phone" is a poor source. And this is why SWATing is a thing.
/r/MensRights06/05/15 04:52 PM
1

One minute with google. Debtor's prisons don't exist in the US either. But if a judge orders you to pay and you don't, you can be found in contempt of court- which can mean jail time. Also for Mr. Foley, they can take away his passport, which would deprive him of his ability to continue to make money (since he mostly works and lives in the US), which would only deepen his problems.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 05:12 PM
3

I've read that child support payments aren't counted either. They do not count as income (as far as taxes), and they are counted as income for the person who pays. Since the balance between the two is heavily skewed based on gender, this could account for much of the difference. It just seems that since most homeless are men that the statistics on poverty would reflect that.
/r/MensRights19/04/15 11:23 PM
1

Why not? I've explained it quite thoroughly in my previous, but since it seems you've only read the first sentence I'll go with another analogy that you probably won't read either. If a company provides you with a car they retain ownership on, then of course they can dictate how to use their car. If they purchase a car for you (as in your name on the title and you're responsible for upkeep), they can't bar you from using it to drive to your Satanic worship ceremonies even if it is against their …
/r/MensRights13/04/15 03:31 AM
2

Your statement without that amplifying information was indeed wrong. Omitting extraneous information isn't the same as being incorrect. I can say the sun rises in the morning without mentioning that it is just an illusion created by the spinning of our planet. Further, it being mentioned in passing was a clear rhetorical tactic to suggest your conclusion about what should or shouldn't be covered is If you replace "amortize" with "offset" it doesn't change my argument in the slightest. This will …
/r/MensRights13/04/15 02:39 AM
0

No one is forcing anyone to work at Hobby Lobby. This is as childish as saying that if you don't like America then move. It really adds nothing to your argument. No one is forcing the recipients to do anything It may not force, but it is definitely coercion since money is a factor in real life. And I haven't seen how it is anything but a useless display of power. If I'm wrong, please explain what it actually accomplishes. but YOU seem to be in favor of the government forcing employers to do thin…
/r/MensRights13/04/15 02:36 AM
2

There was nothing in Hobby Lobby's mandate that said employees were banned from obtaining abortions or morning after pills on their own dime. Yes, someone could go out and spend money on extra health care that would otherwise be covered by a normal health insurance plan. But I simply don't think you should have to. It would be like a health insurance plan that covers everything above the waist. That idea to me is as ridiculous as an employer getting the insurance company to write a new policy sp…
/r/MensRights13/04/15 02:22 AM
2

I say again: Not paying you in steak isn't making dietary decisions. If you were paying in food vouchers and they specifically said no steak, then you've obviously made a decision for them. This isn't a difficult idea to understand. They're deciding what kind of compensation to give. Compensation with string attached. My point exactly. You not forcing someone to do something=/=them making the decision for you. If you say it enough times I'll bet it will become magically true.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 01:57 AM
1

Yes, I did. I mentioned it in passing while making an point about coverage. I wasn't wrong in the point I made. And you still don't get that and continue off on some random tangent.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 01:53 AM
1

I'm saying you have account for it before claiming it's just a supply problem. It has always been that way and you've shown no reason why it is not still this way. They're not making healthcare decisions. They deciding what kind of compensation they offer. They are directly influencing health care decisions as money is power. I'm perfectly free to buy a yacht, but the cost is obviously going to influence my decision. They deciding what kind of compensation they offer. Employers don't have the ri…
/r/MensRights12/04/15 11:51 PM
1

There's a big difference between offsetting the cost and offsetting the immediate cost. One shifts the time schedule, and one shifts the actual total amount. And yet none of that has anything to do with what I was talking about. Please, continue your ranting on random topics.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 11:43 PM
1

At that point the requirement that your employer provides you with insurance becomes meaningless. It is then up to the employer to decide what counts as "health care" and "medicine", and it could lead to Jehovah's Witnesses banning anything with blood products, Scientologist banning mental health services, or some other crazy person banning anything but prayer from their cult leader. I find the idea ridiculous anyway because it is not like your employer can decide what you spend your money on or…
/r/MensRights12/04/15 11:41 PM
3

It doesn't matter in this context. You don't need to explain the entire mechanics and theory behind insurance to talk about what should and shouldn't be covered. What I said wasn't wrong (as there are offsets as well as monthly payments ending up with amortizing immediate cost), and explaining those details wouldn't add to what I was saying.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 04:58 PM
0

That's probably because of the long time it takes to be approved You're really going to argue that it's a problem with inefficiencies in the market and not simply a supply problem? This has never been true in the history of the world (edit: specifically for orphans and not generally for all problems). Because what your employer's insurance covers isn't the only form of insurance. So you want a system where I need to purchase backup insurance to offset my insurance? All to protect the feelings of…
/r/MensRights12/04/15 04:43 PM
6

It amortizes the cost over a longer period of time. And it does so by offsetting the immediate cost. Do you really want to argue stupid semantics? Either way, this has nothing to do with what's covered.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 04:32 PM
2

Not if you had the state take children away and gave them to adoptive parents who could afford them. This is a pipe dream. There are already more kids than adoptive parents. You'd just be pouring gas on a fire. Except it's not dictating medical coverage. It's dictating what a firm is willing to compensate with. This is the slimiest weasel words I've ever seen. You sound like a used car salesman trying to sell me a car without wheels. What good is health insurance that doesn't cover health needs?
/r/MensRights12/04/15 03:52 PM
7

I don't understand his reasoning to be honest. He even dug himself deeper by referring to birth control as insurance against pregnancy. Health insurance is supposed to help offset the cost for care and prescriptions. Why should any drug be exempt? He simply says because "religion". So I'm guessing he is for Jehovah's Witnesses banning blood transfusions for their employees and Scientologist banning all mental health care and drugs. He needs less ranting and more actual logic.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 03:47 PM
1

If it were true then America's colleges would be worse than the worst parts of Africa were rape is used as part of the ongoing wars. So ask them if they'd rather walk through a war torn region of Africa or their local college campus.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 07:13 PM
6

Unless you want paperwork to be required for human copulation or think that sex requires a professional certificate (as in the case of all 3 things you mentioned), I don't think these things apply.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 01:09 AM
4

Ultimately I blame us men for allowing our civilization to devolve to such a point where moron spoiled kids are allowed to interrupt a respected elder without getting a good thrashing. Two points: 1) Once you're past a certain age you don't need to respect someone just because they've lived longer. 2) "Us men" can't control civilization unless you buy into patriarchy conspiracy theories. As for the protesters: what they don't understand is they are doing him a favor. An anti-war demonstrator dis…
/r/MensRights24/02/15 08:42 PM
9

It's balanced out. She gets mocked even by those she adores for her shallow views.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 06:55 PM
2

Feminists aren't trying to shut down the internet. This is a myth spread around by MRAs - that feminists hate free speech and are just trying to silence everyone. Evidence points to the contrary. You have arguments against comment sections on newspapers, the shut down of free speech on campus, and trying to ban porn in the UK and video games elsewhere. They even attacked a liberal gay-rights icon for calling for more free speech just this week. That you have some conspiracy theory about this bei…
/r/MensRights22/02/15 04:55 PM
4

Every famous person on twitter gets mean messages and threats directed at them. In fact, Jimmy Kimmel has a segment on his show were celebrities (including women) read them for comedy. NEWS FLASH!- there are mean people on the internet. Your choices are A) don't read them, B) grow thicker skin, or C) play the victim and try to shut down the internet. Guess which option sane people choose?
/r/MensRights22/02/15 01:40 AM
3

"Internet people" is just people. Some people are assholes. Have you ever driven in a major city? Assholes everywhere. The internet is just an efficient way for people to communicate, and since a certain percentage of people are assholes you get this as the result. So the insults are gendered? Well, that just means assholes took their time to personalize the message.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 06:41 PM
17

Archive link. Don't give these people page views.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 01:30 AM
2

I wouldn't mind if Texas seceded. Don't encourage them.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 06:44 AM
2

Well here in the US we killed an innocent guy. The governor even killed the investigation into his innocence. Either way, you can't compare things just based on one case. But the US having 25% of the worlds prisoners (while only 5% of the population) doesn't make us look that good.
/r/MensRights28/12/14 04:13 AM
15

From the article: “A true gentleman doesn’t sit on the subway, he stands.”
/r/MensRights20/12/14 11:48 PM
2

Some people believe capital punishment is murder. Some people believe soldiers defending their country is murder. Some people believe eating meat is murder. Just saying... but I think all of these people are kinda crazy.
/r/MensRights18/12/14 01:41 AM
2

I don't consider myself a Democrat (even though I often find my self voting for them due to a lack of other options), but I do have many liberal positions. So it has been especially annoying as of late to see what amounts to feminist propaganda in the media leaving me to go to conservative news sites for a balanced source. Liberals need to cut ties with the feminist before they undo much of the work they've accomplished against censorship, proper treatment for criminals and the accused (like due…
/r/MensRights16/12/14 02:14 AM
7

Can we just take a minute to enjoy this article on Jezebel by Anna Merlan? Read the comments, and the follow up for added fun.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 05:35 AM
12

Women buy more clothing, so it makes sense to give their items more space. Men buy more video games, but you're still a misogynist neckbeard for thinking that games should cater to men.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 02:14 AM
1

Youtube is a great teacher. I've used it on plumbing, dryer repair, phone repair, etc.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 09:39 PM
2

My dad died when I was young and my grandfathers were in their 60s when I was born. I wish I had better instructions on these things, but it didn't work out that way for me. I've taught myself how to do many repairs, but there are some things I don't feel comfortable taking on.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 06:09 PM
1

This story has a score of 21. That's not a lot for this sub. The interest is mild at best. And you're still clinging to upvotes as proof of something? If you want to stereotype everyone on this sub, then that's your choice. But sorry, not everyone here is a member of /r/whiterights. I doubt there's much crossover. Have a nice day.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 04:23 PM
1

The upvotes on the story indicate you're a minority. You're currently at a 2. And upvotes prove next to nothing. Actually the places this story is being upvoted is fascinating. Ah, guilt by association. Must be true.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 03:52 PM
1

I wouldn't call it designed for this subreddit, as I'm a frequent visitor of this subreddit but I'm pro gay marriage, agnostic, environmentally conscious, and basically left of center (at least for a Texan). I know others that share my positions and frequent this subreddit as well. Just because you're for men's rights doesn't mean you have to be conservative or even against feminism.
/r/MensRights13/10/14 02:03 AM
5

I had a feeling this whole thing was blown out of proportion.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 03:04 AM
1

'Purple penguin' is just a suggestion. The training just wants teachers to avoid using gendered expressions. So does "children" suddenly not work? "Kids"? "Students", "little ones", "pupils"... there are just so many words to choose from that "purple penguins" just seems like an odd choice (and non-inclusive of other colored penguins).
/r/MensRights12/10/14 02:46 AM
1

Clevon is lucky to be alive. He attempted to jump a jet ski from a lake into a swimming pool and impaled his crotch on an iron gate. But thanks to advances in stem cell research and the fine work of Doctors Krinsky and Altschuler, he should regain full reproductive function again.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 07:22 PM
3

Look at the picture I linked. It is a well known image depicting the "greedy Jewish" stereotype, and the image included in the video was modeled after it. That comment had nothing to do with the wording included in the video.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 06:01 AM
6

If you want to criticize someone and be taken seriously, a few tips: Don't over use profanity. Don't use racist caricatures Don't dehumanize them by calling them creatures
/r/MensRights29/09/14 01:42 AM
4

The Hero of Canton!
/r/MensRights28/08/14 05:53 PM
22

And stop harassing Zoe Quinn and others with threats of rape and murder. It was proven that she was faking at least some of the harassment. This is definitely a "boy who cried wolf" situation.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 05:52 PM
6

When I graduated, there were 0 women graduating with a Computer Science degree. 30+ guys, and 0 women. This was in 2005.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 04:27 AM
4

(1) chose to set a level in a strip club, (2) chose to let you peep at women changing, (3) chose to let you interact with those women. How dare a game actually present real life locations?! All video games should only take place in wonderland with unicorns and fairies! She says "the choices developers made are problematic because they sexual[ize] women and give the player an opportunity to abuse these sexualized women if they so choose". So you're saying that no media intended for adults should …
/r/MensRights31/07/14 05:46 PM
6

What you're saying reminds me of a conversation over Grand Theft Auto. News reporters went around sniping random people, hiring prostitutes, and then killing them to steal back their money. One guy commented that he let his 6 year old play the game, and the kid just went around playing ambulance and fire truck missions saving people's lives and putting out fires. Sandboxes reflect more on you than they do the makers of the game.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 05:32 PM
2

I'd agree with you except for one thing: this was in Arizona. Any resident of that state should know better.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 05:05 PM
9

The only reason for the final outcome was because it was caught on video. That is an important lesson.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 05:21 AM
10

'why would she lie about such a serious thing?' was uttered more than once. Why have a trial at all?
/r/MensRights22/06/14 12:08 AM
41

You'd think they'd be focusing on teaching these girls to stop drinking so much. That would be attacked as victim blaming.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 07:11 PM
22

Why all this hate for the PUA's? I don't know much about PUA, but the one time I did read about it most of the ideas were quite repulsive. The concept of "negging" is the one that stands out. Saying negative comments about someone so they like you? I get the concept, but it makes you an asshole.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 11:39 PM
5

Actually I'm genuinely curious to how someone on /r/mensrights[1] could object to my link. I haven't downvoted you, but you linked to the Daily Mail. That rag is known inaccurate outrage porn. I'd take any facts from the article with spoonful of salt. but a downvote is a deliberate disagreement. Except when it is not. From the reddit faq: Please note that the vote numbers are not "real" numbers, they have been "fuzzed" to prevent spam bots etc
/r/MensRights16/04/14 05:28 PM
5

Don't pay attention to downvotes: the reddit algorithm gives phantom downvotes to mess with spammers. This applies to post and comments. Besides that, complaining about downvotes is useless: they're imaginary points.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 05:20 PM
60

Look through her post history. Even feminist subreddits call her crazy.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 09:30 PM
20

LOL, you've met Bridezilla, my favorite slowly deteriorating source of comedy. Read these these post first for possibly the funniest drama to ever unfold on reddit. Her post history is golden.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 08:34 PM
35

It is a female residence hall. When I lived in a dorm all females had to be escorted in my dorm, so I don't see the issue that this guy is having.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 01:32 AM
1

Civil trials can have juries, too. Just google "discrimination ear rings" and see what lawyers and case law have to say about the subject. If he won, he would be the first. And he would still be out of a job for an extended period of time.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 04:49 PM
1

I live in Texas. You're not going to convince a jury that a man wearing 2G ear rings is being gender discriminated. I agree with him, but I am quite a minority in this state.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 03:19 PM
5

The problem is they don't have to tell you why you were fired, and you'd have to prove that it was because of gender discrimination. This is almost impossible to do in Texas.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 02:22 PM
3

Texas is a right-to-work state, and you can be fired for any reason at any time.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 01:20 PM
92

Rule 1 of waiting tables is to please the most important customer: the one doing the tipping.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 04:18 PM
1

Not all men are fathers, and not all fathers are separated from the birth mother and paying child support. If your estimation is accurate (it would be awesome if you sourced your numbers), the 120,000 figure would still be off by a large factor.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 02:07 AM
23

A family law attorney in Houston estimates that there are more than 120,000 men in this predicament in Texas. A lawyer is not going to be the greatest resource for finding accurate statistics. Let's do some math here. The Texas population is 26,000,000. 49.7% of the population is male, and 62.3% are 18-65 years of age (I'm assuming that the vast majority of fathers with child support obligations are in this age group). If this number were true, that would mean 120000/(26000000 .497 .623) = 1.49%…
/r/MensRights18/03/14 09:53 PM
5

Some people don't want to spoil their children for a good reason. Bill Gates is giving away 99% of his fortune and leaving only a small portion for his children. Does that make him a bad parent? No, it makes him a great one. Now children should be supported at minimum standards. But beyond a reasonable standard it should be a parent's choice how much money is spent on their children.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 01:34 AM
5

In their defense, have you ever seen how tiny pockets on women's clothing are?
/r/MensRights19/02/14 10:13 PM
1

Ask damn near any "gifted" kid, the school system held them back and made them bored. All of the "gifted" kids that said this in my experience didn't end up meeting their potential. I knew a valedictorian who last I heard was delivering pizzas. If you can't work with the system and can't see that school (especially college) has something to offer, you'll go nowhere.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 06:18 AM
1

If the idea was to only incarcerate black people and have alternate punishments for other races you wouldn't say the idea is valid.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 06:25 PM
1

It was all a big lie told by Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott... FYI: Greg Abbott is now running for the governor's office.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 06:31 PM
2

The governor of Texas is elected by the states' popular majority and has nothing to do with the districts, so Gerrymandering is literally not possible in this election (unless you believe the Texas border is Gerrymandered).
/r/MensRights24/01/14 03:04 PM
4

It does if you're a sociopath, that's the whole point You're accusing her of being a sociopath because she got a divorce? That's a stretch. .she was unfaithful during the marriage I'm sure you can cite a source for this? and left before the divorce occurred The article doesn't say the timing of filing, and frankly it doesn't matter. you keep clouding that part of it and act as if they were even together 10 years, it was a long distance relationship for most of the marriage. She lived with him fo…
/r/MensRights22/01/14 08:38 PM
4

So it's not partisan, but only Republican-leaning sites like Breietbart and Redstate are throwing mud at her. Sure. The fact that she was a Republican while serving on a local city council means practically nothing- especially in Texas.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 08:33 PM
2

Divorces involving people with large assets and child custody take years, whats your point? LOL. Sure, they lived and worked together and he helped her run for office all while planning to but not filing for a divorce for 10 years? That makes no sense. She was also unfaithful to him during the marriage by his statement. According to her ex-husband's statements. But why does that matter for a politician? In regards to child custody, yes it says a lot to me because she is a champion of womens righ…
/r/MensRights22/01/14 08:30 PM
4

I mean come on, how often do courts award custody to the father of his kid and HERS! First of all, that is a terrible attitude that sets back the gender equality everyone in this sub is wanting. Secondly, if had read the article she didn't contest custody because she didn't want to upset her children's life. He also cited infidelity in the divorce and since she was living away at Harvard by herself so long I mean come on. Her being at Harvard and the divorce being filed were separated by 10 year…
/r/MensRights22/01/14 08:16 PM
4

Here. This was from the link I just posted. Maybe you have reading comprehension problems?
/r/MensRights22/01/14 07:17 PM
2

And since you refuse to address that I've actually mentioned that she might have cheated in a few replies... You've proven a willingness to mislead. Please show me where. How much credibility do you really think your words deserve after that? Why don't you read the whole original article linked from the OP's link instead of reading out of context quotes from it? Go ahead, I'll wait. Go and see some of the other "bitter" quotes form her ex. LOL.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 07:15 PM
5

You linked to a blogspam post leading back to an redstate diary post with no sources? If you could even prove this true, you'd still have to show this isn't some boilerplate stuff they put into all of these orders. edit: Oh, it was boilerplate. Nice job falling for a smear campaign. You might try not being so gullible as to believe something redstate.com would say about a Democrat's personal life.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 07:02 PM
7

No, we question what's behind it. In Texas, the mother usually has to actively endanger the lives of the children to not have custody. Don't take it from me, take it from her ex-husband: “She did the right thing,” he said. “She said, ‘I think you’re right; you’ll make a good, nurturing father. While I’ve been a good mother, it’s not a good time for me right now.’” Apparently, no one actually reads the original articles linked from the OP's blogspam.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 06:54 PM
50

The quote this blogspam steals from Dallas Morning News is this: Over time, the Davises’ marriage was strained. In November 2003, Wendy Davis moved out. Jeff Davis said that was right around the time the final payment on their Harvard Law School loan was due. “It was ironic,” he said. “I made the last payment, and it was the next day she left.” However, if you continue reading the next few paragraphs... Wendy Davis said that as a lawyer, she contributed too. “I was a vibrant part of contributing…
/r/MensRights22/01/14 06:44 PM
6

From yet another link from your CNN compilation: Over time, the Davises’ marriage was strained. In November 2003, Wendy Davis moved out. Jeff Davis said that was right around the time the final payment on their Harvard Law School loan was due. “It was ironic,” he said. “I made the last payment, and it was the next day she left.” Wendy Davis said that as a lawyer, she contributed too. “I was a vibrant part of contributing to our family finances from the time I graduated to the time we separated i…
/r/MensRights22/01/14 06:38 PM
6

its actually a great attitude and a great question. Men talk all of the time about how they'd love custody and not have to fight it out in the courts, and she does this and you question her motives? if you dont want to disrupt lives, you dont move to another city for school, even if it is harvard. So she shouldn't get an education? That seems really backwards thinking. and she didn't give him the house. the house was in his name. In Texas it doesn't matter whose name it is in if you're married. …
/r/MensRights22/01/14 06:26 PM
11

That's a really bad attitude- especially for this sub-reddit. She gave him custody because she didn't want to disrupt their lives. We should be applauding women who don't use children to ruin their ex's life and decide to pay over $1000 in child support each month. She gave him the house, too.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 05:47 PM
4

From the original researched article linked from your blog-spam link: In 2003, as Davis’ political career soared, her marriage fell apart. After Jeffry Davis filed for divorce, Wendy Davis traded their 4,300-square-foot home for a one-bedroom apartment. The house, which was in her husband’s name, is where Amber and Dru had grown up and that’s where they wanted to stay, their mother recalled. He filed for divorce, and she moved out. This was many years after she had graduated and worked helping s…
/r/MensRights22/01/14 05:11 PM
11

This is all partisan politics, and I hate to see this sub get taken advantage of.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 04:38 PM
18

I don't really want to be put into a position of defending Wendy Davis (I'm a Texan, so it actually matters down here), but I don't really see how this is supposed to cast her in a bad light. Her ex-husband filed for the divorce, he got custody of the children, she paid a nice sum in child support, and the divorce was settled after her (by that time 10 year old) student debts were paid off. If she was conning him or taking advantage, she was definitely doing it wrong.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 04:30 PM
-7

Why?
/r/MensRights22/01/14 02:53 PM
12

Typically what happens is a contempt order like this is entered, the client is trudged off to jail, his lawyer immediately files a motion for the judge to reconsider, and around a week later the now humble client is brought back to court where he apologizes to the judge. Then the judge revokes the prior order. Sounds like a corrupt system. This client seems to have an attorney not familiar with the system. The judge expressed surprise that the attorney for some reason filed an appeal to a higher…
/r/MensRights08/01/14 07:24 PM
17

Six months for disrespecting a judge by walking out? That is cruel and unusual punishment from a judge with a chip on the shoulder. He or she should be relieved of power for that kind of abuse.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 06:45 PM
17

African Americans were disadvantaged because of generational disadvantages. However, every girl born has a male parent, so the comparison between sexism and racism is at best wrong and probably offensive to many.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 06:26 PM
3

This is one of the cases where both sides are probably wrong.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 04:56 AM
9

Not really. I've seen sedentary men who do very little for exercise and still be strong, and I've seen women who live active lives that still do not start to reach the level of the average man. Let's face it: testosterone is a hell of a drug. There is a reason people wanting an advantage use anabolic steroids.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 12:11 AM
0

Men aren't getting the same product What do you mean?
/r/MensRights28/09/13 01:20 PM
1

I don't mean to be confrontative or anything, but this seems very ironic. As other comments point out, it's logically inconsistent to be against AFC gender-equalizing healthcare rates AND want gender-equalized rates in auto insurance. Take 'equality' in both or take equality in none; you can't demand price equality in one and not the other. That was kind of my point, but thank you for stating it more eloquently.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 10:21 PM
12

Since I get insurance through my job and they don't change the rates based on gender or age, this doesn't affect me. Instead of rallying to overturn this law, I'd be more interested in fighting for gender equality in auto insurance rates. edit: Like others are saying, equality under for the sexes is something we should be for. Besides that, I like the ACA for a variety of other reasons like the removal of preexisting conditions and lifetime caps on medical care.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 05:11 PM
2

Sperm from older men is less viable, so he should be able to claim the same. Should she also claim child support for these eggs harvested during their marriage?
/r/MensRights08/09/13 04:48 PM
9

The part where she doesn't bring it up again after that. You seem to have missed the part where she wrote about it and tweeted about it outside of the mailing list asking for outside help to come and brigade the discussion.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 06:01 PM
16

You are completely misunderstanding the community. Drama is very frowned upon. Off topic and/or meta-discussions are a distraction from actual work. This above all explains the negative reactions she received. Your participation and identity in the community is based solely on your actual work contributions, and she was hindering that work while criticizing the people doing the work. Your perception of dumbness or meanness means nothing as emotions are irrelevant to the Linux kernel.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 05:29 PM
17

Linux is Linus's software. He originally made it, and he now runs the system that builds and maintains it. If you don't like how he works, you are completely free (and encouraged!) to branch the software and do things as you want on your own branch. Basically, it is unreasonable to tell Linus how to run his own organization because that is not how it works in the Linux community.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:53 PM
1

And if she were a gay male it would be even worse.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 04:27 PM
14

My first thought was that she must have really been psycho if he was given full custody. That perception needs to change if we're ever to have balance in custody issues.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 07:27 PM
10

The US has the same problem- except few here call it a problem.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 09:22 PM
5

Stating a demographic fact (no matter how ineloquently) is not misogyny. There just isn't a large enough pool of women interested in computer to draw many women into such an organization.
/r/MensRights04/07/13 09:13 PM
1

Simples. If only it were that simple. Some people are born with XXY or other weird combinations. Some poeple are born XY but are unable to properly process testosterone (and thus look and act female). There are many things that can go awry.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 07:35 PM
2

Men will not pay more than women- both will now be equal. Because of this new law, you might now qualify for Medicaid (in 2014?)- you should really check into that.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 08:25 PM
4

It would be "equal" in the sense that men and women would be closer together in terms of net (post-tax) income and buying power. Not all men earn more than women and visa versa. This would both punish and reward people who don't deserve it.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 05:49 PM
0

Not having the participation of the entire class is bad. I was once computer illiterate. These boxes seemed like magic in the hands of the right people, and their knowledge did seem intimidating (where do you even start?!). Until you realize that it's not magic and it's just a set of rules that you can learn through experience. If you're answering a question just to show off, then you're wasting the time of everyone else in class. Let others learn and answer questions wrong, and let the prof sho…
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:23 AM
1

I agree with what you've said, but what do these weeder classes they mention consist of? I didn't learn computer science until I was in high school. In my experience, some people get the concept and some people don't. The "weed out" courses are those where you actually have to write useful code that you can't just copy from examples. In other words, you actually have to correctly identify the goal and use the tools given to you (some computer language) to solve them. There is no amount of memori…
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:05 AM
7

"Thanks, Obama" is the new sarcastic phrase. It even has its own subreddit. He wasn't being serious.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 11:42 PM
1

I had more insulting words planned, but as I have said elsewhere I like to keep a certain level of decorum. Use your imagination as appropriate. Still waiting for your explanation of my lack of substance.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 11:28 PM
3

In what way did I ignore the substance? I simply refuted his false claims with evidence. And you know what? Fuck Obama. He is just another politician. So, unless you can show me where A) The ACA gives women free heart screenings, B) where someone told him he deserves to die for being male, C) where someone actually called him sexist, or D) why he should be entitled to free health care, then I'll just chalk to you up as another butthurt troll.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 08:46 PM
5

I didn't intent to dismiss his arguments with that statement (that is what the rest of the comment was for). I genuinely concerned by the tone of his comment, especially since he was not really replying to me as much as ranting about the wording of an article I linked to. This is just the internet, and there is no use getting upset at random comments on the internet. Someone once did the same for me, and it helped better concentrate on using facts in my argument without being clouded by "interne…
/r/MensRights10/04/13 08:01 PM
3

I felt the need to start with that as he kept editing his post to add to his wall of text.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 07:15 PM
-1

If grapeban is a troll, please just downvote and move on. You forget the most important rule: don't feed the trolls. Your comment adds nothing and only serves to discredit both you and by association this entire subreddit. If you don't have something constructive or intelligent to add, then just don't reply. You MUST be a feminist. Nope. Though you might be a paranoid if you think that anyone trying to raise the level of discussion is against you. Did you see the video of the crazy red headed la…
/r/MensRights10/04/13 05:47 PM
-2

Comments like these help no one. Please stop making men look bad.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 05:24 PM
3

Please verify facts before you start complaining. There are no such previsions in the law, so your whining on the subject reinforces bad stereotypes associated with this sub-reddit even if they are true in other situations.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 05:19 PM
35

You seem very upset about this, so first off calm down. I am not here to try an shame the OP or advance some rad-fem agenda. Men and women both have unique problems, and I agree that men's issues are often ignored. However, as a husband I do recognize that women have unique health challenges mostly related to birthing kids. I (as a father) have to pay for and deal with these issues along with my wife, so any assistance as far as birthing and breastfeeding directly helps men (like me and all othe…
/r/MensRights10/04/13 04:48 PM
189

I'm sorry, but this is in no way because of Obamacare. The Well-Woman visits do not include heart screening, and men get free annual exams as well (for different, non-reproductive things). Here is a list of free screenings for those with insurance. And here is the women's only list. While it definitely sucks that you are having trouble finding affordable care, don't make everyone else in this sub-reddit seem crazy by blaming it on imaginary things. There is already a subreddit for that. I have o…
/r/MensRights10/04/13 03:43 PM
9

Advocating wiping out people based on their religion... and then calling someone else a Nazi. Maybe she doesn't remember what the Nazis are actually remembered for.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 04:49 PM
6

A accuser doesn't need to involve the police to ruin someone's life with an allegation.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 11:33 PM
1

There are disadvantaged people of every race. Instead of paying attention to the color of their skin, I agree with you that we should be paying attention to socioeconomic backgrounds. I went to school in San Antonio with many Hispanic people and comparatively my family was often the "disadvantaged" one.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 04:27 AM
0

Interview as a female in the stem feild. Regardless of your ambitions, young females are seen as temporary, leaving soon to have children. My experience has been quite the opposite as a programmer. Compared to the graduation rate, there is an over-representation of women at my company. I graduated with 0 women and over 30 men, and yet I work with about a 50/50 gender split. And I live in the South in a conservative town.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 04:18 AM
1

IT IS THE BUSINESS OF AN INSURANCE COMPANY. STOP BEING IGNORANT. It is their business, and that is why they decided on their own to pay for it for free. Why? Because it makes business sense- births are expensive and birth control is relatively cheap.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 01:33 AM
12

Show me a square penis and I'll concede. "Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar." -Freud
/r/MensRights19/12/12 11:29 PM
11

There was no outrage, and we all had a really good time celebrating V-Day and D-Day together! Followed shortly by VD-Day?
/r/MensRights19/12/12 09:40 PM
14

Nope. If they were phallic, why would they be square?
/r/MensRights19/12/12 09:36 PM
3

Unless someone has legally adopted a child (a definite claim of responsibility) no one should be assessed support for someone else's kid. The justification is that society shouldn't have to pay for a man's child if he is capable of doing so. Unfortunately, as this case shows, the laws have have been twisted to lose their original justification.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 06:51 PM
12

Private property with public access is still subject to discrimination laws. Imagine if they tried to open a "whites only" gym (and yes, racial discrimination is part of some religions).
/r/MensRights16/11/12 05:58 PM
2

A majority of women don't support abortion. This is just simply not true.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 09:27 PM
13

Because of childbirth, yes. And childbirth is a huge expense. This is why the insurance companies made the deal with Obama to cover contraception for free- because it actually saves them money.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 08:49 PM
22

So women should pay more for health insurance?
/r/MensRights23/10/12 08:18 PM
12

MRAs practice the same SRS ban model--remove all dissenters who don't follow the MRA religion. When did this start happening? I thought the mods here just let people like that be downvoted. Do you have any proof?
/r/MensRights15/10/12 08:54 PM
13

On /r/wtf right now there are many pictures of people taken without permission- some photos even involve minors. Often, these photos involve nudity of mentally unstable people. There has been no outcry.
/r/MensRights13/10/12 03:44 PM
1

You can be sued even if the law is on your side. The only reason they haven't lost yet is because of the DMCA.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 06:05 AM
6

Just substitute "black" for "man" and retell the story. Get them to explain why "We can't assume they aren't going to hurt our white children" isn't racist.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 09:16 PM
1

Sandra Fluke makes a statement calling for free birth control for all women at the taxpayer's expense. At health insurance's expense, not taxpayer's expense. It is an important distinction as far as the politics go. Can we just call them both sexist and move on?
/r/MensRights23/04/12 04:19 AM
15

Cool. Now why is there heavy lobbying to make sure that women pay the same for health insurance, and no lobbying for young males and their car insurance rates?
/r/MensRights31/03/12 12:26 AM
0

Health insurance never has paid for non-health care related cost such as what foods you eat, and it has for a long time paid for prescription drugs. Basically, I don't see how your comment is relevant.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 11:20 PM
1

I'd ask you to cite sources for such a bold claim, but it doesn't matter anyway as health care cost should be covered by the insurance company whether it be a $9 prescription or a $100K surgery.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 11:17 PM
1

Many contraception drugs have other uses besides contraception, and denying a woman medicine to treat these conditions just because the drug has other uses is illogical and immoral. Second and most important, not wanting to pay for it is illogical as it actually saves money (births are expensive and raise everyone's health costs). So if you want to save money, you should be wanting your insurance company to be handing out condom and birth control pills like candy.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 11:14 PM
12

A lot can be summed up with two questions: Do you think women should pay more for health insurance since they cost more, or do you think that is discriminatory? Do you think men should pay more for car insurance since they cost more, or do you think that is discriminatory? Do you answers differ, and if so why? That is a good first step to understanding.
/r/MensRights30/03/12 10:56 PM
1

Although occasional brilliance appears on 4chan (million monkeys typing...), I think anyone wanting to be taken seriously should distance themselves from their content. This is one of two 4chan post up right now. Can we please have a no 4chan rule?
/r/MensRights09/02/12 06:13 PM
1

Like I said, I am no TLC expert, but I still think your analysis is off. I can't believe I am debating TLC lyrics, but "shorty" refers to a girlfriend, and the lyrics say nothing about the woman being independent (there is no mention of what bills or anything else). Once again, actually read the lyrics instead of putting your own meaning to them, and then get back to me.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 02:38 AM
1

"No scrubs" is about a loser who uses people and doesn't even take care of his kid Read the lyrics from my link and please show me where that is mentioned. All I see is a guy getting made fun of for not having money or a car.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 12:40 AM
3

For example.
/r/MensRights29/12/11 06:44 PM
1

I'll take women getting fair treatment and men getting screwed over both genders getting screwed. I think both genders should face equal treatment. If women have to suffer (like equals to men) to bring attention to the suffering of others, then so be it.
/r/MensRights19/12/11 07:28 PM
2

Not saying that they shouldn't be charged, but I think they learned their lesson.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 02:52 AM
2

No.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 06:49 AM
2

Technically if the male cattle doesn't have a penis, it is not a bull but instead an ox. Only the testicles are removed when castrating cattle.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 02:53 AM
2

I am a pro-choice man, but I would still be sad if someone had a miscarriage. Just because I think a woman has the right to choose doesn't mean a fetus has no value. People who believe in abortion aren't all heartless monsters. Debate pro-tip: you'll never win anyone over in an argument if you don't understand why they hold the position they do.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 02:28 AM
5

That's funny because when I watched the video you couldn't see thru the counter. Thank you for using your x-ray vision and telling me what really happened.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 10:54 PM
1

There my not be a premium for dangerous jobs, but there are still differences in jobs that men and women do. When I was graduating from college, before graduation they had us line up outside the auditorium by major. All us graduating computer science majors stood around and joked about the lack of women and how we should have been an elementary education major because their line had all of the women. But there were no females in our line. NONE. It was 25+ males. Who is going to earn more: a pers…
/r/MensRights05/10/11 04:39 PM
3

I'm having a hard time understanding your comment... are you missing punctuation or calling me a forum?
/r/MensRights21/09/11 04:04 AM
5

The part that says "we are not against the concept of men's rights" Saying something rarely makes it true. Actions speak louder than words.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 12:48 AM
3

The intent of posting links in AMR is to call out, shame, and silence those whose opinions with which you don't agree. That you don't see that is quite amazing. I know there are crazy people in MR (as there are in any group) who do the same thing as AMR, but they are not the majority. And by using the same strategy those involved in AMR have sunk to their level. Having your sole purpose as being opposed to something adds nothing positive to the situation, creates polarization, and helps nobody.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 12:46 AM
3

I just told this to my wife, and she said "now they will just hire women to murder!"
/r/MensRights21/09/11 12:16 AM
1

Spoken like a true bigot.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 06:08 PM
5

LOL. Where do you find the energy to waste so much of your time trolling?
/r/MensRights12/07/11 03:28 AM
11

This includes supporting the child's upbringing by providing support so that they may have a decent standard of living. Nice trolling there.
/r/MensRights01/07/11 06:17 AM
2

Double jeopardy means you can't be charged for the same instance of a crime twice. If he did it again, it is a different crime, and he could be charged.
/r/MensRights16/05/11 05:53 AM
1

Isn't the woman also responsible for child support if she gets raped? Just looking at it logically. The child support is for the child, not the woman.
/r/MensRights11/05/11 06:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter