TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

crashfrog Archive

View 0 posts and 46 comments by crashfrog on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Asking you to think abstractly apparently is something you're unwilling to do so I will try another tactic. Did you forget how this started? I'm still asking you to defend this idea that making things completely up, things that would never exist that nobody would ever do, and feeling something about them somehow tells us something about what is real. A whole lot of people wanting to be called the proper pronoun care about labels. The labels of laws? We're talking about laws. So I reject your arg…
/r/MensRights15/09/17 07:40 PM
1

Said the person who blatantly ignores the article I linked without even a rebuttal. "Ignore" what? This was openly the stated justification for the law, and moreover that's what it does, it's an appropriations bill that gives money to local law enforcement to do particular things, things that support particularly categories of crime that were being systematically disregarded and that primarily affect women. There's just not a way to dispute that - that's what the law is. The qualities of the "Vi…
/r/MensRights15/09/17 06:43 PM
1

The title of the Act wasn't an accident, it wasn't about being against violence Yes, it's about reversing a systemic disregard of violence particularly targeting women. Like, it's right there in the name, but reading isn't your strong suit. The rest of your statement is simply double downs on Sorry, I don't know what you mean by "valid." No such law exists, so no, it's not "valid" to say that there's a "Violence Against Men Act" or to speculate as to the nature of such a law, since there isn't o…
/r/MensRights15/09/17 01:53 PM
1

You're using the wrong kind of logical formula. I'm talking more about balancing the equation. Ok, but that's algebra, not logic, and it doesn't work there, either; moreover, when people try to tell you things about the reality of racial relations and discrimination in the United States in the year 2017, they're not doing fucking algebra. They're trying to communicate true facts to you by using the English fucking language, and to pretend otherwise is to be engaged in nonsense. Let's take VAWA, …
/r/MensRights14/09/17 08:29 PM
1

It's a common tactic when analysing the validity of a logical statement. I've actually taken coursework in logic, and no, it's not. Again someone told you this was true but it's not. You can't test whether 4 + 4 = 8 by substitution of totally different values (i.e. the fact that 2 + 9 doesn't equal 8 doesn't tell you anything at all about whether 4 + 4 does.) The social context of power and privilege in which the concept of race is embedded isn't something you can just swap around. "White people…
/r/MensRights14/09/17 07:57 PM
0

When you can take their own slogans and replace the chosen ethnicity with a different ethnicity that results in an entirely different response it proves your side isn't internally logically consistent. I wonder why you think that's true. Like someone told you it was true - that this "ethnicity swap" argument was an actual way to generate knowledge instead of obviously stupid nonsense - and since it flattered your prejudice, you believed them. But let's say that I don't believe you when you say t…
/r/MensRights14/09/17 07:33 PM
-19

Pro-tip: it's not "racist against white people" to suggest that their concerns aren't more important than anyone else's. I realize this comes as a shock.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 05:25 PM
0

"Embedded agitators posing as Nazis to make us look bad" isn't an excuse you'd let ANTIFA get away with; why should I grant it to you? Because the flags were wrinkly? Dude, come correct.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 05:25 PM
-29

The left is definitely the anti-racism side, yes.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 05:09 PM
12

To be fair, the guys with Swastikas are Nazis.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 05:00 PM
2

If you don't know what it means, how do you know what to expect?
/r/MensRights14/09/17 05:00 PM
1

Its still racism even if it's just because you can't get laid.
/r/MensRights14/09/17 04:58 PM
-19

Also the right: "its not racist when we do it"
/r/MensRights14/09/17 04:56 PM
5

I was on mobile, so I posted it a dozen times by accident, and then deleted the extra posts.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 06:38 PM
23

Whoever has custody of the kid has diminished income, most likely, since parents need to at least occasionally parent during normal business hours. Therefore it's just for the person who isn't spending any of their time parenting their child to contribute monetarily and offset that parent's diminished income and the increased burden on state programs.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 02:44 PM
1

But nobody else is here to say anything else. It's just me.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/17 08:15 PM
1

so how is this a echo chamber? I mean I think I've been pretty clear so far. Maybe you could ask a more specific question?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/17 07:59 PM
1

Right, then this isn't one because he is having view challenged right now by you in this sub. Sure, but only by me. And we're all on a ten-minute post limit. So there's a rotating stable of people like you to jump in immediately when he's on a post timer, but my views only get one post every ten minutes. An echo chamber is a result. It's not a policy.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/17 01:08 PM
1

basically if your mom agrees with you in a conversation your in a echo chamber. If nobody is there to say anything else, yes, that's an echo chamber. That's exactly why nobody puts their mom down as an employment or character reference. you disagree with everyone elses definition, and dare to call them wrong? Why do you think right and wrong is determined by popular vote?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/17 12:58 PM
1

No, because for what must be the fifth or sixth time, an "echo chamber" doesn't require banning or censorship of opposing views - merely that the opinions you're exposed to in the chamber are, largely, the ones you already hold.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/08/17 12:11 AM
-1

It's pretty funny how the robot showed up to refute you
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/17 08:42 PM
-1

Yes, when it was highlighted that that does not clearly define the term. Literally nobody said that. All the examples of why it doesn't... Nobody gave an example of why that doesn't. The back and forth.... The jib jab... I don't deny that people had replies, but nobody pointed out any flaw or inconsistency or incompleteness in my definition; they simply felt that an "echo chamber" can only be created if it's a space where dissenting voices are silenced. But that's not true, and doesn't even make…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/17 08:14 PM
-1

Also, you said "That isn't what determines what is, or isn't, an echo chamber.", without actually explaining what is, or isn't, an echo chamber. What? Obviously I did, several posts back: An echo chamber is a place where you only hear your opinions mirrored back at you. For instance, when you call another sub an "echo chamber" and 50 people reply "yes, it's an echo chamber." How could I possibly have been more explicit?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/17 07:46 PM
-5

I think what /u/crashfrog thinks is that any sub is an echo chamber. I think it's hard for self-selected communities not to be an echo chamber. That's why there's echo chambers all over the place. But ultimately nothing so strongly indicates that a place is an echo chamber than when they all agree, unanimously, that every other place is an echo chamber, but this one is the ultimate free market of ideas or what the fuck ever. "That other place is an echo chamber" is basically the equivalent of wh…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/17 07:13 PM
0

This. Is. Not. Suppression. Of. Speech. I don't recall saying it was. That's irrelevant to whether you're in an echo chamber or not. See, here's the problem - you don't even perceive a difference between actual dissent and stupid trolling: Go over to r/twoxchromosomes and try to say that a girl who was drunk and consented to sex wasn't raped In which thread would that be on-topic? In which thread would that be anything except dickish trolling? Which girl are you talking about, specifically? What…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/17 07:03 PM
-2

A consensus of opinion doesn't mean it's an echo chamber. A place where all you hear is your same opinions echoed back to you is an "echo chamber." Why you only hear the same opinions echoed back to you is irrelevant; it's an echo chamber regardless. How do you not get this? Most of the time they're retarded virtue signalers. Saying "virtue signaling" is a very particular kind of virtue signaling.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/17 06:24 PM
-9

You're here disagreeing with me now and aren't being silenced. I never said anything about "being silenced."
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/17 04:13 PM
-11

An echo chamber is a place that doesn't allow dissenting opinions An echo chamber is a place where you only hear your opinions mirrored back at you. For instance, when you call another sub an "echo chamber" and 50 people reply "yes, it's an echo chamber."
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/17 04:10 PM
1

"It's an echo chamber" YEAH IT'S AN ECHO CHAMBER YEAH IT'S AN ECHO CHAMBER YEAH IT'S AN ECHO CHAMBER YEAH IT'S AN ECHO CHAMBER YEAH IT'S AN ECHO CHAMBER YEAH IT'S AN ECHO CHAMBER YEAH IT'S AN ECHO CHAMBER YEAH IT'S AN ECHO CHAMBER YEAH IT'S AN ECHO CHAMBER YEAH IT'S AN ECHO CHAMBER YEAH IT'S AN ECHO CHAMBER YEAH IT'S AN ECHO CHAMBER YEAH IT'S AN ECHO CHAMBER YEAH IT'S AN ECHO CHAMBER YEAH IT'S AN ECHO CHAMBER
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/17 04:08 PM
1

the legal system in family law makes decisions based on prior rulings Sure, because people have a right to consistent treatment under the law. Nevertheless, judges balance that right against the particulars of the situation before them, and against the other rights that are in play.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 02:36 PM
1

You mildly amuse, if nothing else
/r/MensRights15/07/17 04:05 PM
2

And eventually, we will come for you... lol. ;) I doubt it. Electric shopping cart scooters won't roll that far from Walmart.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 04:04 PM
0

The more interesting question is why Anita S. was able to build an empire on the backs of gamers. That's literally not something I can recognize as having happened. An "empire"? Jesus fucking christ. Literally nobody has heard of her except people, like you, in the throes of outrage addiction. Not a single fucking gamer has anything "on their backs."
/r/MensRights15/07/17 04:03 PM
-3

It really doesn't help me take you seriously when you lie right to my face.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:56 PM
1

YOU ASSHOLES are the ones claiming that the male suicide epidemic can be solved by "men talking about their feelings." No, I believe we can make a pretty serious dent in the male suicide epidemic by curbing the ownership of handguns. I've never said anything about "feelings", although it makes sense that if your feelings are driving you to suicide, being able to talk about them with someone who could potentially help is a good thing. Fuck you...What a crock. You should be ashamed of yourself...Y…
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:55 PM
3

you think the rights of the kid supercede anything done by the mother or the rights of the dad.. Makes sense to me, since the child is the one in this situation by the least degree of its own action. Being the least contributing to the situation in which they find themselves, they're entitled to have their interests weighed the most. Additionally, adults can profitably work and children typically cannot (and anyway shouldn't, since they have school to go to.) The harm to an adult of having some …
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:50 PM
1

Male suicide. Lemme guess: men need to cry more? A genuine concern for the male suicide rate would lead you to support restrictions on the ownership and storage of handguns. Do you? Or is this just a second issue that you actually don't give a shit about, it's just a handy baseball bat for you to beat Anita Sarkeesian with? And if that's the case, and you're just exploiting the male victims of suicide in order to score a cheap point on the internet, then why should I think she's the awfulest per…
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:41 PM
2

what about the thousand men tortured and slayed to save the damsel? Yeah, actually, what about it? Is this something you care about, or just a devil's advocate counterargument? If you don't actually give a shit about the portrayal of (some) men as basically disposable bullet-stoppers, grist for the hero's mill, then why should she?
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:38 PM
0

I did (it wasn't very long.) It's unresponsive, as I said.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 01:37 PM
-16

That's not really responsive to my point.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 01:33 PM
-25

Sure, for men who don't get ahead of the situation or who had already voluntarily accepted paternity. It's a greater injustice when a child grows up without support simply because the "correct" father can't be identified.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 01:19 PM
4

Sorry, who do you think is paying women "a living" to make "unfounded claims on the Internet"?
/r/MensRights15/07/17 01:14 PM
-39

Literally none of that is true. Women have the same child support responsibilities for their children that men do, and both men and women can obviate those responsibilities in identical ways: by the legal ruling that they're not actually the parent, or when their children are adopted by someone else.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 01:12 PM
2

Look this is just how women talk in locker rooms
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/17 01:03 PM
3

I don't see what's wrong about girls wanting to date tall guys. Nothing, really. The double standard is that only women are permitted to have standards with regards to body shape and appearance. A woman's preference is empowering; a male's preference is a problematic and illegitimate pressure that negatively affects the development of young women.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/16 05:12 PM
21

I always hated "show your work" when it didn't come with an explicit instruction about what the work was I was supposed to show. I don't consider knowing that 10,000 g is 10 kg "work", I guess, so until somebody explained what I was doing wrong I would lose points for not explicitly showing the division operation.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 03:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter