crazicelt Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
2	I'm not really wrapping my head around how having a good personality makes someone sexually attractive to another person Keep in mind these are fairly recent labels and for most of history asexuals or demisexuals weren’t acknowledged. So the percentage is likely underreported. Oh 100% Demisexuality was first recorded as a label in 2006. It's not even 20 years old yet and barely has a presence outside LGBT positive places. Hell, even now, there is still debate whether Demisexuals are actually a part of the community.	/r/ExRedPill	15/05/24 06:16 PM
2	I'm not really wrapping my head around how having a good personality makes someone sexually attractive to another person And most probably wouldn't want to date a demisexual woman. I wouldn't because I want to be with someone who thinks I'm attractive for other reasons than my personality. You completely misunderstand Demisexuality here. Humans have 2 types of attraction that lead to sexual attraction, physical and emotional. In most humans, physical is primary and leads to a desire for emotional connection, which is the core of a relationship. For Demisexuals it's flipped the emotional connection leads to the phy…	/r/ExRedPill	15/05/24 06:13 PM
3	I was tasked with making a lecture about gender equality and the wage gap specifically. What are some good subjects\resources I could use? Sounds good but if I were you I'd play all sides so you show blatant examples of men and women struggling. If you want to show how easily stats can be manipulated then show Sue Bird was highest paid WNBA player at $215,000 in 2019 yet LeBron James is payed $134M in the 2019-20 season. And the average NBA salary is 7.7 million the average WNBA salary is $100k Looks bad right. But then show that the WNBA revenue is approx $60 million but the NBA revenue per year is $7.4 billion. Then cirlce it aro…	/r/MensRights	23/03/21 07:02 PM
1	Is there a moral equivilance beween circumcision and FGM? No I had the opposite, well sort he explained it to me that the shaft was growing quicker than the "hood" would allow I only had a tiny gap for my urine to escape through and that is what was causing the pain. Either way I was in agnoy and the treatment stopped said agony	/r/MensRights	24/05/20 11:09 AM
0	Is there a moral equivilance beween circumcision and FGM? I disagree, I know from personal experience that Circumcision is a valid medical treatment. I had a severe version of phimosis or Paraphimosis, I think I was 10, I was in constant agony everytime I had to urinate, I didn't have the luxury of waiting for other methods like creams or steroids. The surgery was the only option, so it can be used as a valid treatment. Don't discount my life experience out of hand because it doesn't fit with your ideals.	/r/MensRights	24/05/20 12:48 AM
0	Is there a moral equivilance beween circumcision and FGM? I disagree, I know from personal experience that Circumcision is a valid medical treatment. I don't see why you are dismissing my life experience out of hand. I had a severe version of phimosis or Paraphimosis, I think I was 10, I was in constant agony everytime I had to urinate, I didn't have the luxury of waiting for other methods like creams or steroids. The surgery was the only option, so it can be used as a valid treatment	/r/MensRights	23/05/20 11:47 PM
0	Is there a moral equivilance beween circumcision and FGM? This is a interesting source. I may disagree with name or permanent ban of circumcision, having had a circumcision for medical reasons. I know they can be beneficial. However its worth looking at. Next time please just link a source than just shouting at me I had 2 sources from reputable places just yelling your opinion without backing it up will not change my mind.	/r/MensRights	23/05/20 09:39 PM
-5	Is there a moral equivilance beween circumcision and FGM? No I haven't read every peice of literature the WHO has on this I didn't need to. This is the WHO not some unknown website, they are a reputable source who review the research and create a summary for non experts.	/r/MensRights	23/05/20 08:52 PM
-3	Is there a moral equivilance beween circumcision and FGM? Condoms work better by orders of magnitude I never suggested that circumcision is better did I? Secondly I refer to this: https://www.who.int/hiv/topics/malecircumcision/en/ This article highlights that there is evidence that Circumcision, not MGM but professionally and consensually performed Circumcision, can increase resistance to HIV by 60% that's not insignificant. And I know from first hand experience that Circumcision is a valid medical treatment.	/r/MensRights	23/05/20 08:07 PM
1	Is there a moral equivilance beween circumcision and FGM? Well as others have said FGM comes in various forms with far ranging implications some lesser and some greater than circumcision. However, there is a dissonance between MGM and Circumcision. This journal here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4266893/ highlights how poor practice and attacks turn circumcision into pure mutilation. Circumcision when performed professionally and consensually is a valid medical procedure that can improve someone's life, and can improve resistance to cer…	/r/MensRights	23/05/20 05:54 PM
1	If you care about men's rights, vote for those who promote them. I agree but I feel that MRAs WRAs and TRAs should create 1 movement pro people movement of you will. Raise it above the partisan lines of nations as much as possible. There are some issues that should transcend party lines.	/r/MensRights	19/03/20 02:47 PM
3	If you care about men's rights, vote for those who promote them. Exactly, politicians tend ot try and deal with issues that are at the forefront of peoples minds, men's rights generally isn't, so saying the only option is to vote for politicians who spue vitriolic bigoted hateful crap because they mention men's rights issues is nieve and counter intuitive. If we vote in people who spread hate to improve men's rights the we risk people associating men's rights with the hate filled policies of those we elect.	/r/MensRights	19/03/20 02:03 PM
0	If you care about men's rights, vote for those who promote them. Exactly, politicians tend ot try and deal with issues that are at the forefront of peoples minds, men's rights generally isn't, so saying the only option is to vote for politicians who spue vitriolic bigoted hateful crap because they mention men's rights issues is nieve and counter intuitive. If we vote in people who spread hate to improve men's rights the we risk people associating men's rights with the hate filled policies of those we elect	/r/MensRights	19/03/20 02:01 PM
1	If you care about men's rights, vote for those who promote them. Sometimes you have no choice, You always have a choice, I will never risk validating racism, xenophobia or bigotry to improve men's rights. We'll be cutting off our nose spite our face. If there is none you support then run yourself.	/r/MensRights	19/03/20 01:54 PM
6	If you care about men's rights, vote for those who promote them. I agree with the sentiment but this must be partly satire because Davies has consistently voted against equality for gay people and against economic equality. I'll never vote for someone who improves our lives at the expense of someone else's. Because as you said that isn't equality.	/r/MensRights	19/03/20 11:49 AM
17	Men express our emotions differently then women. See I agree that men and women are typically different when it comes to dealing with things like break ups and death of loved one's. However I'd say everyone is unique in how they deal with things, and no standardise system of coping will help everyone.	/r/MensRights	22/02/20 03:05 PM
7	Saw this being taught to a medical friend of mine in a course In the UK It shows how many men do commit suicide if the murder rate is approx 3+times more for women.	/r/MensRights	21/02/20 11:45 PM