TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

crussiam Archive

View 2 posts and 30 comments by crussiam on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I totally agree. I just mean to say that the quotes from him in the article paint his rapist as sympathetic. Not alluding at all to the fact that the sexual confusion and being a dad at 14 (both results of the rape) eventually caused his massive depression.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 03:41 AM
2

From what it seems, he doesn't even realize he was raped.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 10:30 PM
5

Appreciation for the summary!
/r/MensRights05/04/15 07:29 PM
6

Thanks for the summary!
/r/MensRights05/04/15 07:28 PM
3

Is there a tl;dw?
/r/MensRights05/04/15 06:18 PM
2

That's true, but the post was concerned about debt. Not that the family would have to rebuild wealth that they may have accumulated.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 05:01 PM
5

Not sure where this is, but here in Florida, you don't inherit personal debt. As long as he was the sole name on the credit accounts for treatment, his family wouldn't be burdened.
/r/MensRights03/04/15 04:58 AM
10

The most profound part of the whole video "this is not a zero sum competition." Amazing! Imagine that we don't have to be downtrodden on to for women to also be successful.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 03:02 PM
3

Could be trespassed for being on school property after hours though
/r/MensRights13/03/15 05:42 AM
3

After all the rape allegations against NBA players, my dad joked that they should just have teammates watch them have sex so they could bear witness to the woman's consent. It scares me that's where the world is actually coming to.
/r/MensRights29/01/15 06:38 PM
46

"Wait, that movie was terrible! I never wanted to see it, but you forced me to!"
/r/MensRights30/12/14 09:32 PM
2

You can also take screenshots of the text messages and save backups of those pictures.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 04:45 PM
1

I understand null hypothesis and burden of proof well. I'm well aware on how to construct an argument. I'm putting a burden of proof exactly where there needs to be one. When discussing an argument of this nature burdens of proof must provided by any side making a claim. If you affirm the statement "boys should not be circumcised against their will" you are logically required to support this statement. I'm not making any claim in the argument of circumcision. Therefore I have no burden to prove …
/r/MensRights21/10/12 01:31 AM
1

Well being burnt down there probably wouldn't be fun either way, but I'm sure being uncircumcised would at least give the head of the penis more protection. Whatever that would mean after getting burnt on the rest of the genitals.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 08:19 AM
1

I'm going to STO: I have no idea what it's like to have an uncircumcised dick. I would think hot coffee on one would be the same as another regardless of the amount of skin one has versus the other. Burnt flesh is burnt flesh.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 05:35 AM
1

Of course people who are unknowingly violated still counts as a violation. I'm just stating I don't feel as if I, personally, was violated. I'm not defending the practice. I never realized this was an issue until now. I didn't realize circumcision was so bad and was asking why it is. I'm ignorant of the repercussions you seem to find so evident. This post may make it sound like I support circumcision, I don't. I've yet to form an educated opinion on the matter and posted here to get some info. T…
/r/MensRights20/10/12 03:52 AM
0

Would being uncut affect burnt genitals differently?
/r/MensRights20/10/12 03:15 AM
1

Can someone bring me up to speed on this issue? I was circumcised as an infant and never thought anything of it. I don't remember it nor do I think it's had any traumatic type impact on my life. Why is it so detrimental?
/r/MensRights19/10/12 08:54 PM
4

Prose poetry is written in in a more natural grammatical style instead of in verse, which is the rhythmic writing we normally associate with poetry. Neither have to rhyme to be poetry.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 10:13 AM
0

Personally? No, I don't think that would be right on moral grounds. I will, however, will bring it up as major contention in my paper, which is what this post is about.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 02:47 PM
0

I still think there is a difference between a man having (non-abortion) decision making power over his undeveloped fetus and power over a woman's autonomy. The two are not necessarily the same and I doubt think you've shown me otherwise. I don't mean to be rude saying this, but your friends do not represent women in general. You seem like a very intelligent, up to date person, and I'm sure you surround yourself with people who are similar. You can't look at your friends individual cases and say …
/r/MensRights30/09/12 02:20 PM
-1

I'm not sure it's as simple as "weighing" the risks. No one person can say how an abortion, or pregnancy for that matter, will affect their bodies in the short or long term. I think the problems with many woman having abortions, is that they are short-term decisions that are made without truly going over potential consequences. "Absolutely. No one would argue against that, but the woman is making that decision having weighed the risks, it isn't being decided for her." The issue I take with this …
/r/MensRights30/09/12 06:14 AM
0

Well, I don't believe a father having decision making power over his own child is a bad thing. The moral question of him having power over a woman's body and autonomy is completely different, I agree. I don't want to take away her opinion or power in the decision making process, I just don't feel it's right that the father has no opinion or power. I'm very sorry for your loss. I can't imagine what that must have been like going through. I've never had the experience of going through pregnancy (w…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 05:31 AM
1

I'm not saying that a man simply wants to be a father. I want to discuss his right to be in the decision making process. Currently he isn't in it at all, which I think is wrong. I might include legal paternal surrender, but it is too late to change my topic completely. It may be the easier argument, but then there wouldn't be any fun! Thanks for your comment!
/r/MensRights30/09/12 05:09 AM
0

I'm not asking for support, love, karma or anything of that sort. I'm asking for concurring opinions that may support my paper, or constructive criticisms which I may also address within my paper. If you could let me know, on what levels you find it "ridiculous", I would be appreciative so that I might address those with you, and in my paper. Legal paternal surrender is the solution to men, who impregnate women, and do not want to be responsible for the child. I want to discuss men who want to k…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 05:06 AM
0

That's an interesting point. I hadn't previously really looked into that technology. It depends on when that technology is ready to come to market, because many women might want to use that technology even if they want to keep their children just to avoid pregnancy and giving birth. A man has a right to autonomy too, right? A right to decide for himself what he wants out of life? What about his right to decide if he wants a child? Sure, he could adopt or find a surrogate mother, but in the case …
/r/MensRights30/09/12 04:50 AM
1

If a man doesn't want to be with a woman, he still has to pay child support, assuming he isn't given full custody, which rarely happens. So, the "she shouldn't have his child because she doesn't want to be with him" argument is moot because the same doesn't work for men. A woman might not want to be with the biological father, keep the baby, and raise him/her with a different man she wants to be with. Thanks for your comment!
/r/MensRights30/09/12 04:45 AM
2

Of course my paper says they have none. Otherwise, there isn't an argument to make! The inequality in the law about men having to pay child support is evident. In the cases of men, the courts overwhelmingly decide that consent to child support, perhaps does not lead to consent to pregnancy or delivery, does lead to responsibility over the child's care. Utilitarianism is difficult because it often ignores the minority in all cases in the name of the "greater good." Of course, that depends on whic…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 04:41 AM
1

It's too late for me to outright change my topic. I am however, adding this as a serious point to support my thesis. Thanks for your comment!
/r/MensRights30/09/12 04:26 AM
0

Well, parental rights certainly do exist, i.e. the rights a parent has for and over a child. It follows, that in lack of a mother or father (a person is a single parent) they then have maternal or paternal rights. It is also evident that since the mother has the right to decide what to do about having a child she has maternal rights. However, I do believe there is such a thing as paternal rights. In divorce hearings if the father is not given custody, which he usually is not, he at least gets vi…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 04:25 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter