TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

crybannanna Archive

View 0 posts and 144 comments by crybannanna on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

But it is allowed everywhere except France.
/r/MGTOW01/09/18 01:34 AM
18

To step away from the bullshit for a minute, there actually is a simple rationale (if flawed). It is giving priority to the well being of the child over any rights of the adult man. Consider, for a minute, what happens when a paternity test shows that a man is not the father. He can, and many would say should, relinquish all rights and responsibilities to that child. Seems reasonable and fair, right? Sure.... but who suffers from this? The mother (screw her, she’s a tramp and a fraud), the child…
/r/MGTOW01/09/18 01:33 AM
8

If she came forward, unprompted, then yeah... that makes sense. You don't want to prevent false accusers from coming forward and admitting their crime. If they discovered evidence, then she admitted to lying... then she should go to prison for a long long time.
/r/MensRights15/05/17 05:06 AM
2

Didn't realize the aggressors were 14. Thought they were all 11. That makes a big difference. If it was my daughter, I admit, I would be more inclined to throw the book at them. But honestly, that's because part of me thinks women are weaker than men and more fragile. It's my own sexism that makes me more protective of girls. So yeah, I see your point.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 11:23 AM
1

I think she should seek justice, in the form of punishment, but if she did everything under her power it could easily ruin those girls lives. Sexual predator registry can be a really fucked up stigma. They could be forced on the registry for this, if the point is pressed. Honestly, if it were me I would fight as hard as my child felt was necessary for justice. If he felt truly violated and wanted to go all in, then that's what I would do. If he wanted to be lenient and forgiving, then that's wha…
/r/MensRights10/05/17 02:47 AM
1

Ok. You go ahead and start the list (we'll both pretend you haven't already started).
/r/MensRights07/05/17 03:25 AM
1

As I said... wouldn't be the first time. Next time it comes up I'll have to press the issue.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 08:32 PM
1

That is what it means... it means that if there is a draft, you're on their list. But there isn't a draft. And there won't be anytime in our lives. So, it's hypothetical. Still, girls should have to sign up just like boys at this point. It's absurd that they don't. But even if they did, they wouldn't likely be the first ones called. First they'd draft the young men, then the young women, then the older men, then we're all dead.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 12:55 PM
1

My wife had to register for selective service, just like I did. Or maybe she is mistaken, which wouldn't be the first time.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 12:51 PM
-3

Yes, I agree. And if there is a draft, maybe they will be. We don't know, because there isn't one and isn't likely to be one.
/r/MensRights06/05/17 01:08 AM
5

What point. There is no draft. Nobody gets drafted.... so logically, the point is that no one should have an opinion. So what is it hammering home? That OP is a retard?
/r/MensRights06/05/17 12:50 AM
2

The case could be made that nearly everyone has some level of poor upbringing and/or psychological damage. But at some point, that just becomes a part of the human condition, doesn't it?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/17 02:50 AM
1

Considering honey buns is a prison staple... pretty damn poor
/r/PussyPassDenied24/04/17 07:42 PM
1

Ah, little Debbie... the poor man's hostess. Zebra cakes are the bomb!
/r/PussyPassDenied24/04/17 05:45 PM
43

Nah, I think it's a byproduct of eating.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/04/17 05:45 PM
24

As someone who has been overweight, I didn't get shit as a kid. If I whined for something I would get a beating. Still, cake is delicious. Though I'm not an entitled asshole, I'm just lazy and like food.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/04/17 04:19 PM
22

Not getting laid makes you hate the other sex. It's better to rationalize your loneliness by claiming high standards, than accepting you're gross and no one good wants you.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/04/17 04:17 PM
0

Maybe you have weird balls ;)
/r/MensRights20/04/17 12:36 AM
6

You can't physically sit down with your legs together? That's not true unless you have medical issues. The reason it's less comfortable for men to sit like that isn't about his dick and balls.. it's the shape of the hips of men vs women. It's more comfortable for a man, given his pelvic shape, to spread out. But not impossible or painful for him to not do that. Just less comfortable. So when there are no seats left except the one next to you, and someone wants to sit, if you keep your legs sprea…
/r/MensRights20/04/17 12:16 AM
1

Did you not see that I was clearly joking? The whole fake gameshow thing was a dead giveaway. I guess that triggered you, huh? Project much? The level of stupidity, is almost laughable if it weren't so goddamn sad. You have absolutely no self awareness. It's pitiful.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 05:45 PM
0

No, they won't. Thanks for playing "predict the future" with your host, me! You lost the game but you get the consolation prize of the home version of "predict the future". It's where you make you're predictions, but you keep them to yourself. See you next time on... PREDICT... THE... FUTURE!
/r/MensRights18/04/17 04:20 PM
1

Hmm. Definitely something to consider. I might need to shift my worldview a bit. Maybe nature is a bigger factor than I presupposed. Thanks for the info. You a rock climber or something? That's pretty cool.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/17 12:06 PM
1

I never said nurture only. In fact, I said sometimes nature does determine interests. I just don't honk that generally applies to modern jobs, where it often takes a combination of skills (both task oriented and people oriented) to be good. Doctor, lawyer, police officer, even IT has both interpersonal and task oriented dimensions. Even if your hypothesis is correct, it doesn't negate what I'm saying. Further, it is next to impossible to separate out nature vs nurture considering the nurture par…
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/17 02:34 AM
11

I'm thinking the girl was with Antifa. Not the dude who looks like a young republican.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 05:17 AM
1

You're saying that interest in law, or medicine, or computers is genetic? Honestly, I never imagined I needed a source to refute that. I took it for granted that interest in computers, an invention that is less than 100 years old, couldn't possibly be coded into our genetics which have evolved for millions of years. If you are saying that interest in hunting and fighting is genetic, then yeah... that makes sense. But modern employment interests? I honestly don't see how that's even possible give…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 05:04 AM
1

And what contributes to interest in a field? At least in part, it's the perception of potential success in that field. If you believe that field X isn't welcoming to you, then you will be averse to it (unless you're a glutton for punishment or a moron). Interest in something is often cultivated. It isn't innate. Well sometimes it is, but often it isn't.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/04/17 05:18 PM
1

Why does that make a difference? The two are related. If an industry is perceived as unwelcoming to you, would you choose that industry? The number of applicants is directly related to how welcoming it is to that group. You don't see that? Weird.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 03:53 PM
1

I don't know. Honestly, she doesn't dwell on it or blame her company. I know as she was moving up in her career she mentioned some sexist practices, but she never really blames it for anything. (It was always directed at someone else). She does quite well, and has beaten out a good number of men for her current spot. Though she has mentioned she gets paid less than some of her male counterparts, at her rate she realizes she can't really complain. She a bit conservative, so she looks at things ob…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 03:49 PM
1

I hadn't thought of that. You make a good point. But as I've discovered, the gap is more like 5% when comparing equal jobs. The rest is due to differentiation of jobs between genders (nurses vs doctors)
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 03:36 PM
2

Because I know the people I'm talking about, and it doesn't apply to them.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 03:32 PM
1

I don't know, but I would imagine it's more men than women from my limited experience.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 03:31 PM
2

She should demand a raise. The question is why does her employer think she is less valuable? Perhaps in her case she's right, and they are considering her less valuable because she's a woman. Perhaps she actually doesn't perform as well. It's impossible to tell case by case. But yeah, there's nothing you can say except that her situation sucks and maybe she should find a company who isn't so sexist to work for. Why support this type of behavior? If she has value, then better to give that value t…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 03:31 PM
1

I was only saying that large of a gap isn't reasonable given what we know of business interests. I don't doubt a gap exists, just that it can't be 23%. I totally buy a 5% gap, as studies have suggested exist in a job to job comparison. But 23% is immediately and apparently asinine.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 02:44 PM
1

Then it isn't a fair comparison. I've heard it stated as "for the same job". If it's about different jobs, then it isn't a wage gap it's a glass ceiling. Those are two different issues. I totally believe women face a glass ceiling, for the record.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 02:43 PM
1

I don't know if that's an insult or compliment.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 02:41 PM
1

Yeah, they sure are doing poorly. They hardly profit at all /s
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 02:41 PM
1

But this argument would suppose that every single person in power holds this discriminatory view. That is preposterous. You're failing to realize that the entire business world is composed of individuals who make these judgements. Surely some of them would realize how much they could save, and capitalize. Not all, just a few open minded individuals who need to fill jobs. Are you suggesting that not a single hirer isn't sexist? Wouldn't the single non sexist hirer have a competitive advantage? We…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 02:40 PM
1

None of that last part is true.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 02:37 PM
1

People get hired at the rate required to get the people desired. That factors in years of experience, education, specific skills, competition, etc. each additional requirement usually requires more pay to attract qualified people. If a company can attract and retain qualified people at minimum wage, then that is precisely what they pay. Believe it or not, companies want to maximize profit. If they can get what they need for less, then they will. That's why a minimum wage exists... because compan…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 06:55 AM
1

I think you're missing my point. I fully acknowledge that individual bias could be at play. What I'm saying is that the CEO of the company wouldn't necessarily have that bias, and could unilaterally mandate women be given preferred hiring to save that money. It doesn't require anything other than a mandate from a single individual. In order for this wage gap to be real, at the level of a 23% disparity, it would require the malevolent mustache twirler you're talking about to enforce. Otherwise, s…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 06:48 AM
2

No, it doesn't. Women account for half that customer base (unlike black people) which was around 0% for most companies in the 1930's. The other half wouldn't be alienated by a company predominantly hiring women. It would immediately endear the company to 50% or the customer base, and the other 50% would largely not give a fuck.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 06:36 AM
1

Honestly, a wage gap difference of less than 5% (on the low end) isn't particularly substantial. But if that's what we are talking about then I'll go ahead and say, sure... a 5% difference could be entirely due to sexism. 5% is fairly inconsequential, and not really cause for alarm or a great deal of action. I think if the wage gap were stated as women making 95 cents for every dollar that a man makes, the cause would be over. That's close enough by nearly anyone's standards.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 06:34 AM
1

No, blacks in the 1930's weren't educated. Also, hiring blacks in the 1930's has marketing problems. Racism was crazy back then... hiring blacks would have been alienating your customer base. But you surely knew that already.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 05:55 AM
1

Did you read that labor report? It essentially says that the wage gap is due to women having different jobs (part time vs full time), and being less reliable (maternity leave), and opting for lower paying jobs for added benefits of work life balance. So essentially, it says that women get paid less because they DO NOT have the same jobs as men. They aren't paid less for the same work at all. I mean, you couldn't have read that report and then wrote your comment. Am I missing something? What I've…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 05:54 AM
1

This makes sense to me. It would make sense for the disparity to be due to self advocacy, rather than hiring practices. And 5% wouldn't be large enough to effect the on-boarding strategy f a company.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 05:48 AM
1

I've been paid less than women (for the exact same job, that I often do better) in every job I've ever had (including currently). That doesn't mean anything, except my personal experience is an outlier. Im sure I've also been paid more than other men, and women, doing the same job. That's sort of how it works... they pay as much as you're willing to accept. If those around you advocate better for themselves, they get paid more. In my current job, the woman who gets paid more actually helped me g…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 05:47 AM
1

They don't. Promotion from within is actually harder as you go higher up on the ladder, not easier.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 05:42 AM
2

If the half you're removing is a half that gets paid 20% more, then it is precisely how you save money. You know that's the entire reason behind outsourcing. To get a labor pool that costs less. Companies do this all the time. But it's being suggested that they could save 23% on all those jobs they can't outsource, and they don't care to? It doesn't make sense. And all that would be required is that after interviews conclude, they would favor the women and offer them the job first. If none of th…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 05:41 AM
2

But if that's the case, then it would hold true that those companies who hire women (and pay less) would do a lot better. They would see immediate savings and wouldn't be blind to the reason. They would be incentivized into hiring more women. For a moment presume you are the CEO of a company. You've heard that women get paid 77% for the same job. You, as CEO, have a mandate to increase earnings, and are presented with a potential 23% savings. If you were to investigate, and find this is true, wo…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 05:32 AM
5

IQ? How does IQ have any bearing on moving up the corporate ladder. I'm sorry, but I do not agree that intellect is directly correlated. Seem far too many morons in positions of power. Neverthless, the days of moving up directly are long gone. People leave every few years so that they can move up more rapidly. You go from company A to company B at a higher position for more money, then in a few years go to company C to repeat. Many high level positions aren't internal promotions, but external hi…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 05:11 AM
8

I'm not bitching, I'm making rational counter points to your comment. Honestly, you aren't sounding like a reliable narrator. You study and sit on your computer, but your point is that women spend their time putting on makeup? I would think all that time studying would make you more rational, and less emotionally invested in your narrative of "women suck at computers because they put on makeup and are social" You've actually reinforced my point about confirmation bias and added a bit of open hos…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 04:51 AM
5

I'm not disagreeing. Statistical realities are a thing that is sensible to take into account. However, most companies do not presume that any of their employees will stay on past a few years. Such is the way of the modern workforce. I believe it's an average of 3 years with a company, though adjusted for each industry. Given that, the statistical likelihood of a female employee having a child and needing time off is diminished by the likelihood that they will leave before this occurs. What might…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 04:45 AM
6

Industries are not the same as companies. Some industries where women dominate the field include education, nursing, retail, fashion. Basically industries that fall into traditional gender norms of caregiver or design, you will find a glut of women at every level. Fields related to those are seeing growing numbers of women rising up through the ranks. Most notably in the medical industry, as more women are becoming doctors then ever before. If I'm not mistaken, I believe the med school graduates…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 04:37 AM
9

It's difficult to not do this, but often our personal experience isn't representative of the world at large. You may not have seen good female engineers, but you should realize that this isn't really meaningful to anyone but you. Not intending to be disrespectful of your experience, just anecdotal evidence isn't really a good source for knowledge. I don't believe women are any less capable in these fields by dint of having ovaries. Other factors are at play, most likely. Either your personal exp…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 04:21 AM
12

It is sexism because it is presuming something about an individual which might not be accurate, based on their sex. That being said, though maybe untrue for an individual it is true of the whole in aggregate. Still, there is no rule that states that something sexist is inaccurate. They aren't mutually exclusive.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 04:08 AM
25

It's sort of a cycle. Because few women choose these careers, those that do are at a disadvantage. It's a known phenomenon where people select those who most resemble themselves when hiring and promoting. It is subconscious bias, but it is reasonable. When filling a position, who better than oneself. Failing that, you are drawn to the person who you most see yourself in. Considering people only have moments to make this determination, physical resemblance often plays a large, albeit subconscious…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 03:27 AM
23

I've worked alongside women my entire career, and I've never seen any take inordinate amount of breaks. I think your personal experience isn't reflective of the whole, in this regard. For the record, I've also never found any income disparity between myself and my female colleagues. Right now I work with a woman that does my same job, and she makes significantly more than I do. She has been there longer, so I don't consider it unfair. I expect I will be making what she makes at some point soon, …
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 02:47 AM
37

That isn't entirely true, but accounts for a large portion of the disparity. As I said, the finance industry does tend to favor men. They don't pay men more for the same work, but they are more open to hiring men and promoting them to higher levels. This dynamic is changing, but it isn't an entirely fair playing field. And I would add that this isn't through some malicious intent on the part of the companies at play. It's merely that the higher ups are men, and when they hire people they tend to…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 02:43 AM
683

If women truly got paid 77% of men, for the same work, then all companies would hire women only and save a shit ton of money. Why don't any of them do this? Because either the disparity is not that great, or there is a financial upside to hiring men for that extra amount. Companies do not become global powerhouses by intentionally wasting 23% of their payroll budget without getting something in return for that investment. It's so obviously untrue, that I can't believe it's so universally accepte…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/17 01:46 AM
1

This is fairly standard temporary insanity, crime of passion, defense. Seeing something to objectively horrifying that you can't reasonably control your actions. Nothing particularly Texas about it.
/r/MensRights16/03/17 02:59 AM
1

Don't have to put the seat down, if you never lift it to begin with.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/17 07:13 PM
-1

I have done research on this, actually. There is a statistical increase in transmission of STDs to uncircumcised men. That's just a medical reality. The reason is that the foreskin often has micro tearing due to friction and tension. Some people can experience chronic infections, and chronic tearing leading to the necessity to circumcise later in life. It isn't a medical necessity, but there are some medical benefits. Maybe you should do your own research before disregarding it. Beyond the resea…
/r/MensRights20/02/17 12:17 AM
-4

Most of those make sense except the first one. Female circumcision isn't at all the same as male circumcision with the exception of the word. It's an entirely different process, with entirely different results and has absolutely zero medical benefit for the female. Though male circumcision is falling out of favor, its is still done for the prevention of future medical issues that come with being au natural. Tearing of the foreskin is a relatively common thing for uncircumcised men, as are infect…
/r/MensRights19/02/17 10:28 PM
2

Look, I'll admit I was ignorant. I wasn't trying to bs I was just wrong, and operating on incorrect information. I though I knew about something, and I was wrong. I've admitted my error. But yeah, you were being and still are being, a dick about it. You've never made a mistake? You've never thought you knew about some topic you didn't? That's bullshit.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/17 03:31 AM
4

Thanks for the information. Though did you have to be a dick about it? Probably yes.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/17 07:37 PM
5

What was the cause? Sounds like a good wrongful termination lawsuit. Firing someone for what they do on Reddit seems like an impossible thing. First they would need to prove that your Reddit behavior is grounds for termination. Then they would need to prove that you are your Reddit account. Then they would need to prove that your Reddit account can be reasonably attached to you, such that the behavior of that account would reasonably reflect on the company. The first one might be easy to show, b…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/17 04:20 PM
3

And this has to do with men's rights how? First, wifey doesn't mean wife. It means a girl that is like your wife, but you are not married to. Like your serious girlfriend. That's the most common usage, and it's sort of an urban word. Hubby is used to mean husband. Mostly used by soccer moms. Second. Wifey and hubby don't correlate. Wifey would correlate to husbandy. Hubby would correlate to wiffy. But husbandy and wiffy aren't words. So they are just two totally different words with totally diff…
/r/MensRights14/01/17 02:29 AM
0

It's because she is a girl and therefore considered weak. It's assumed that her slap hurt but didn't harm, like getting slapped by a kid. If you go to a store and see a kid slap an adult, you think "what a shitty parent". If you see the adult slap a kid with full force you think "holy shit! Is this abuse?" Society treats women like children in this regard due to their physically weaker state. It shouldn't be ok for a woman to slap a guy, just explaining why most people aren't as bothered by it. …
/r/PussyPassDenied03/01/17 01:42 AM
5

But she isn't objectively pretty. She has a huge head. She looks like she has mild hydrocephalus. The shape of her head is not objectively attractive at all. She does have some good features, but the head deformation just ruins any objective idea of her attractiveness. Symmetry and proportion are extremely important to objective standards of beauty, and she falls outside the zone of ideal by a wide margin.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 07:52 PM
0

Dude, are you just trolling my comments now? I keep seeing you respond to me, and each time it's a silly childish insult. What's up? You lonely or something?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/10/16 03:07 AM
2

Potential is not actuality. Things don't deserve protection because they have potential. Rights are given to actual things, not some potential future thing. An egg isn't a chicken, even though it could become one. They are distinctly different things. A caterpillar isn't a butterfly, even though the potential is there. It just isn't the same, and shouldn't be treated as such, IMO. Potential human should have significantly fewer rights than an actual human. I think it's morally wrong to force an …
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/16 02:32 PM
1

Thanks for acknowledging that I'm not a whack job, like the ones you mentioned. For the record, I'm pro-choice but I'm against 3rd trimester abortions. My reasoning is as I stated, at some point the fetus is developed enough to be a legitimate human being... And though I don't know where that line is, I must acknowledge its before actual birth. By the third trimester, most of what we consider human is there, so that's my line, arbitrary though it may be. So the dumpster thing, the difference is …
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/16 02:28 PM
1

You realize that your logic, to some, gets used to go all the way back to sperm and egg. Why should the fertilized egg be considered differently than the sperm and egg separately? Each has potential to be human. The meeting of sperm and egg is not some magical thing, it happens all the time and has the potential to happen with every single one. We all make distinctions. Yours goes back one step, mine goes forward. They are all arbitrary, but necessary. A human being is nothing more than a human …
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/16 12:36 PM
1

Theres a lot of people who are ok with abortion who wouldn't have batted an eye if the girl in the article had aborted her child five minutes before it popped out. That's not true. I understand abortions if it's the life of the mother or the child Why? Why would it make any difference. In your estimations they are equivalent lives. If we're not sure where the line between human life and a cluster of cells is, what right does anybody have to destroy it? because if we don't know whether it's a hum…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/16 12:30 PM
1

Go back to r/the_donald with your racist neo-conservative bullshit.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/16 05:04 AM
1

It's more than just that. A 2 week old fetus isn't simply defined differently because it hasn't gone through the birth canal, it is fundamentally different. I think in all ways that matter, a fetus is not human before it has reached certain developmental milestones. That doesn't mean birth itself, to me... Rather some time before birth. Anywhere in the third trimester, I would tend to define it as a human life. Before that, it just isn't developed enough to constitute a human life in any way oth…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/16 05:02 AM
-4

What? No... I'm not anti GMO. Make a lot of dumb assumptions I see, based on nothing. I have a hard time believing you understand basic science, given you seem to not understand the biological distinction between fetus and newborn.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/16 01:01 AM
1

I'm not redefining anything. A fetus is a well defined term regardless of your ignorance about basic biology. You make no distinction because you have a black/white world view, lacking nuance. Then you call those who disagree with you evil, because it plays into your childish mindset. The reality is that the distinction between a baby and a fetus isn't so well defined. At some point it is a simple cluster of cells, and it develops. While in the womb it does tick off enough boxes to rightly be ca…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/10/16 12:58 AM
-5

Yeah, they also drank coffee in the morning and showered regularly... They did lots of things. "Hitler did it" is not a logical point.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/10/16 11:17 PM
-11

fetus =/= baby. Here's a quick test. Does it want milk? Can it live outside of a sack of goo? If the mom dies, will it live? Yes to any of those and you have yourself a baby. No to them all... That's a fetus. It's a parasite that might turn into a person.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/10/16 10:22 PM
1

It's not normal, she is clearly mentally unstable.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 09:37 PM
1

It does the same for men... Who wake up the next morning staring at a fatty.
/r/MensRights27/10/15 11:56 PM
23

I don't think most women could take the possibility of rejection at that scale... it would break their brains. it is also a long ingrained tradition... the entire act of marriage is a tradition.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/14 03:43 AM
3

I think it is good advice for everyone, to disassociate with anyone who is against you bettering yourself. At least as much as possible... especially relationships. The entire point to life is to continually improve oneself. Its nice to have the help of those around you, but not necessary as long as you don't have others trying to stifle you. We should be motivating our friends/family to do and be better... and expect motivation from them in return. many feel threatened when someone they know tr…
/r/TheRedPill01/05/14 03:45 PM
1

the age gap only really matters during the teen years... after 20 its largely irrelevant. Its really not the gap at all that I find creepy... because if she were 18 and you 22 that sits fine with me. something about 17 and below though just creeps me out. I suppose its society's moral indoctrination at work. though that could also be why I find cannibalism and bestiality creepy... so I guess I'm ok with it (not that I'm in any way relating those with your thing). to me 17 is a child... 18 is an …
/r/TheRedPill01/05/14 02:24 PM
3

you're 21... she is 17. you have been "friends" for 4 years, making you 17 and her 13. creepy.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/14 05:57 AM
2

Woody Allen is mega rich... therefore he is Alpha by default. Dude can buy and sell most people... that's power... power is attractive. though I've never met a woman who finds WA attractive. either way, he married his own adoptive daughter and is accused of molesting his biological daughter... guy seems like a Pedo creep to me.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/14 04:34 AM
1

I tend to think violence, or the threat of violence doesn't encourage respect... but the opposite. I have never witnessed a woman being aggressive with a man, so I don't see this as an issue in society. perhaps it just doesn't happen where I'm from. I feel that women should not fear men physically... men and women are not physical equals so aggression towards them is akin to aggression towards a child, or sickly man, or small animal. Only a bully needs to exert power over the powerless (or less …
/r/TheRedPill30/04/14 03:12 AM
1

I don't tolerate women who behave "badly"... I simply have no use for them. I don't prevent women from verbally abusing, hitting or slapping men.... the men should be able to defend themselves. If a woman "verbally abuses" me, I put her in her place verbally without the threat of violence (perhaps the very real threat of my absence) and I've never had a woman attempt to hit me in a non-playful way. I wouldn't tolerate it, and would defend myself as I would against a child hitting me..., I wouldn…
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 09:29 PM
1

I see where you're coming from now... his attitude was bad and this isn't a problem he is helping with at all. for the record, I dont know any men that would even think of doing this... though I did see it pretty frequently as a child. It used to be a bigger problem than it is now, I think... though twitter didn't help at all.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 08:18 PM
-2

I guess I should have phrased that "I would" ... I will is too easy to quote as a threat. by the way... for those of you incapable of chewing gum and walking at the same time... I don't think anyone should smoke cigarettes, drink heavily, but I loves me some booze and smokes. you do understand the meaning of the word SHOULD right? why do I bother responding... guess I'm just that bored.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 08:15 PM
1

no argument here... them guns sure even a playing field.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 08:11 PM
-2

you know nothing about me, yet you assume I have no experience with violence. that is almost laughable. I never said violence is unwarranted... when it is appropriate it should be used. threats of violence are for cowards who are avoiding real confrontation. If I see you attacking one of my family members I won't threaten you with violence, I will bash your brains in with a lead pipe. I said I don't believe people should threaten violence... said nothing about using violence. its like you people…
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 08:02 PM
1

whose seeking equality? certainly not me. if you're seeking equality then you best find another planet, because this one is fresh out. and what are you doing in this sub anyway? that being said, your response doesn't seem to have any relation to my comment... not sure if you actually read what I wrote or are responding to a different comment.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 07:52 PM
1

I agree that his words on twitter aren't particularly useful. however, the man is an author... so he probably believes that written words have power of some sort. we are all pointlessly writing into the void (I'm doing it right now)... its pointless, but it occupies the tedium of daily life. I can't fault him for doing it by expressing his view on the subject of violence. As a moderately accomplished novelist, his written words have a lot more influence than yours or mine, IMO. I doubt he had ul…
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 07:47 PM
-7

life is unfair... grow up. women are physically weaker... therefore more vulnerable.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 06:24 PM
-4

I figured I had you pegged. you are a child, incapable of logical thought. also.... I know you are, but what am I.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 06:22 PM
-3

people who argue like you frustrate me. a logical argument cannot be presented if the most basic premise (unspecific blanket statement) of value cannot be agreed upon. if you believe that there are circumstances where a man should threaten a woman with violence then we disagree on a level that doesn't warrant further discussion. I believe no one should threaten anyone with violence, you disagree... we have an impasse.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 06:14 PM
-4

Men suffer more violence FROM men.... he was saying that men should stop threatening violence. He specified toward women, but didn't exclude male on male violence as an issue. I don't see your point here at all unless you specifically disagree with something he said... just because he may have excluded things that are also a problem isn't really an issue. He also didn't mention nuclear proliferation, or starving children... because he wasn't talking about that. I'm certain he is against violence…
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 05:32 PM
-3

tell him I like his books.... oh wait, you don't know who I am. never mind.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 05:28 PM
-11

men shouldn't threaten violence against women. do you disagree?
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 05:17 PM
2

we will agree to disagree on that one I guess. my attraction to a woman is all that I care about... if I'm not attracted enough to her to date her them I have no interest in giving her the D. but to each his own.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 04:52 PM
3

I meant, why would you want to still have sex with a woman you are no longer attracted to? you broke up with her because she got fat but you still want to bang her? I don't get it.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 04:33 PM
7

why?
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 01:46 PM
21

Men don't forgive a betrayal because it is sometimes the only thing we ask of our SO. Once that trust is broken, what precisely does the man get from this relationship. Also, there is something innately more personal and intimate about having another person inside of you... you might touch something with your hand that you would never put in your mouth.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 01:03 PM
2

she has every right to say she wants what she wants... I give her credit for being honest. that being said, she is telling you that she wants out of her committed relationship with you. You don't need to dump her, because she already dumped you... she is just trying to keep you around as a backup. you should move on... immediately. she is not that into you, dude! have a tiny but of self respect and stop accepting that which is unacceptable. forget about BP or RP and just opperate with common sen…
/r/TheRedPill28/04/14 08:03 PM
13

I would suggest he tell her that if she doesn't like what he has, then he will find someone who does. He could also point out where the door is, if she forgot. or he could see this as a golden opportunity to bring extra (strap-on wearing) females into the equation. I feel like that could be a compromise everyone could live with. Maybe I should be a sex therapist.... though this would probably be my solution to EVERY problem. Husbands the world over would book my services to convince their wives …
/r/TheRedPill25/04/14 09:35 PM
0

well... lots of people here do seem to hate women a bit. not everyone, but some of them sure do.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 04:04 AM
2

you gotta get rid of that venom.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 01:10 AM
2

your boast makes me sad for you. just saying.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 03:04 AM
2

well... that isn't right either. obviously.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/14 11:51 PM
7

don't think she belongs in Guantanamo for a stupid tweet.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/14 10:28 PM
5

What type of brain could be offended by the comment "a man should be a man and a woman should be a woman"? what dumb fucks.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/14 04:57 AM
1

um... yikes. that quote pretty much answered that question about Tesla's sexuality.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/14 04:36 AM
1

I understand all the reasons for being overweight because I was (considerably) not too long ago. I was, though I didn't realize it, addicted to sugar and to laziness... I still have a sweet tooth, but I use moderation... and I'm still incredibly lazy but I work hard at the gym to make up for it. I realized one day that we are not in a singular state, but rather, constantly changing. I would keep getting progressively fatter if I kept living the way I was... or I could do something about it. Many…
/r/TheRedPill11/04/14 06:42 PM
-1

probably more likely... in fact, he could have easily had aspergers or some form of autism. explains both the lack of relationships, the complete genius in a specific field, and why he died alone and pretty much broke living in a NY hotel. He just couldn't manage other aspects of his life very well, sadly.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/14 05:12 PM
2

when I told my wife that a kid attacked a school with a pair of kitchen knives she chuckled... as if to say "what kind of moron attacks a bunch of strong young people with a knife." then I told her that 20 people were injured, and she got serious... looked at me with utter confusion on her face... and said "how?". Even my wife's first reaction to this was WTF.. why didn't someone throw a desk at his head? Where we are from kids throw chairs at teachers for fun... so this shit would have been han…
/r/TheRedPill11/04/14 05:03 PM
1

Or he may have been gay. back then it would have been unthinkable to give THAT as a reason for permanent bachelorhood. Just saying.., he wasn't known for his relationships with women at all, no less marriage.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/14 04:44 PM
1

it is a terrible choice considering the options available... though I do understand how obese people don't feel like its a choice because they feel they lack control over their body and have a relationship with food similar to addiction.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/14 03:23 PM
2

this exactly proves my point,,, he started as an anonymous millionaire then gained rep and was able to become a billionaire. then he failed because that happens sometimes, or perhaps because he didn't make the billions smartly (of he did it from rep alone then he was bound to ultimately fail as I said)
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 06:13 PM
6

anonymous millionaire. I don't think your reasoning is sound. if you have the rep of a millionaire, but not the financial acumen (which is why you aren't one) you surely could raise money in 1 of 2 ways. most likely loans... people would be willing to loan you large sums of money with the thought that you could make larger sums with it.... problem is, you would not have the capacity to pay it back. so eventually (pretty soon) you would be in vast debt, publicly humiliated as a failure and be the…
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 04:49 PM
7

nothing in his letter was wrong factually, nor was it presented in a mean or rude way IMO. frankly, that's why she is so upset about it, because it is accurate. It spoke to the example she sets for others living a clearly unhealthy life. Being overweight is NOT like being black, or gay, or a dwarf, or disabled.... it is a condition that is both unhealthy and easily (relatively) treatable. It shouldn't be viewed as a legitimate state of being, but a condition brought on by unhealthy habits. thoug…
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 05:08 AM
3

I feel like women who are unfaithful find an excuse after the fact why they hate their man... then rework it in their brain so as not to have to admit they are a slut.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 11:03 PM
16

it sounds pretty healthy to me... as long as it wasn't ATM. I would keep in mind that if the day away becomes a regular thing she will become accustom and she will go back to normal. think of your absence like a drug... now and then its enjoyable. all the time and she will adapt and stabilize, even relying on it and being irritable when it doesn't happen. your best bet is if it is irregular and moderately unexpected... though I realize its probably not up to you.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 10:45 PM
21

I think it is a subconscious reaction to the new opportunity for infidelity you have. she may not even realize it, but in the back of her mind she is thinking "he could go find another woman so I should please him when he is home." It is a form of bond strengthening that needs to last longer than a day... which is healthy. Her primal side is thinking "I need to put my stank all over him to mark my territory" and the thought that you are out of the home providing sets of the cavewoman reaction. h…
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 10:29 PM
3

everyone, men and women, are less resistant to a competing view when their side is first acknowledged as being understandable. It essentially communicates that you hear their point, acknowledge it in its entirety and then counter with more facts... reasoning... whatever. if I agree with you on something, your natural human tendency is to be more open to agreeing with me on something (unless you are a huge asshole). you get what you give in this way... it's like if you take a walk and smile and w…
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 05:39 PM
1

yikes... good thing she's hot, I guess. I never understood a woman who wants to wait for marriage until over 30. It's the equivalent of selling a stock at its lowest price... surely they know that they get less marketable by the day after 27. At 35 she won't even be viable for child bearing anymore (risks go way up at 35). The most sensible play IMO is for a woman to marry at 25, to a man who is 33 (around). she is at her most marketable, as is he... men may look best in their 20's (though that'…
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 04:33 PM
0

her exact quote was "Maybe I will marry with somebody when I will be 35 or later!"? really, exact? I don't think I could live with someone who spoke like that.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 04:06 PM
5

I don't need my fantasy TV to be realistic in that way... that's why I like the hot blonde who controls dragons.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 07:13 AM
2

some kids are planned... lust isn't really the cause of their existence as much as planning and an understanding of biology. neckbeards don't need to be hungry to eat... they are always eating. rich people still work... for non-monetary motivators (status, desire for accomplishment)... even an unpaid hobby is work, it just isn't a job. trying to enlighten oneself and live above the carnal desires of the human animal is a noble (though for most futile) pursuit. check out the Buddhist monk setting…
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 06:06 AM
6

I like her character fine.... I hated the mother who was constantly meddling and making things worse because she thought she knew best. I think people don't like her because she is a snob... in sure her character will be evolved.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 02:07 AM
3

ha... yeah, that too.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 10:16 PM
1

I agree with the concept of clearly articulating your motives. the given example is a horrible one though. what I take away from the article is that a man should approach a woman with a specific game plan. not "lets hang out" but "I want to take you to dinner at X, then go see Y". women love a decisive man. also asking "what time are you available?" is clearly better than "would you like to?"... its more assertive and presupposes that she would warm to go in a date with you. confidence + asserti…
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 08:18 PM
0

this would have been amazing had you left the last sentence out. still a great comment.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 07:29 AM
10

that is lame... sorry, but even if that works you should stop using that "routine" because its gross. just grab her and kiss her when your good and ready, excuses are for pussies. or do whatever you want, I'm not your dad.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 06:17 AM
9

agreed... usually it means wealthy/elitist, and says nothing about intellect.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 05:01 AM
1

*other
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 01:16 AM
5

I liked the images accentuating your philosophizing. Nicely done.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 12:47 AM
12

he lost me at "charlatans like Neil DeGrasse Tyson." That's intellectual inferiority complex on a whole new level. This alone ruins the others credibility IMO.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 09:29 PM
2

I agree totally... I may have misinterpreted what happened as a guy helped out a stranger in need... and the stranger secretly took advantage. perhaps he knew she was taking advantage and let her do so, which is different and he shouldn't have allowed it. If I kindly offered to pay someone's bill because I saw them in need (man or woman) and they wanted extra shit, I would immediately rescind my offer. fuck that.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 01:49 AM
3

I thought she snuck a car wash bill on top without the guy knowing.... if he knew, and let her add to his bill then I agree totally. if he was being kind to a stranger and the stranger took advantage by secretly adding to his bill, I say he is a good guy who got taken advantage of by a cunt. either way, the girl in the story is a d-bag undeserving of kindness and generosity. I'm sure whoever is fucking her treats her like shit, as she deserves.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 01:45 AM
1

for some I agree, but loads of those women have incredible bodies. there is no way they aren't getting validation IRL. perhaps they need an endless stream or it, but they are certainly getting hit on all the time. I think some need validation (the fatter/uglier ones), some do it for some monetary benefit (I don't quite understand how this gets monetized, but it must), and some do it because they get sexual pleasure from knowing strangers are looking at them and fapping away (exhibitionists). the…
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 01:10 AM
3

I thought blue pill was helping women hoping to get something from it. didn't realize helping others with no self benefit was beta... doesn't seem like it. sometimes you help someone, not because they appreciate it, but because it is the right thing to do and because you need to know that there is at least 1 decent human being in the universe, even if its only you.. not everything is for personal gain or profit... but maybe that is "blue-pill' to you. maybe he was hoping for a pity fuck... in wh…
/r/TheRedPill06/04/14 08:28 PM
3

I don't imagine the guy thought he was gonna get a blowjob out of it... he was probably just trying to do something nice for another human being with NO intent on quid pro quo. that's called being a good person and is entirely red pill. That guy might have done the same for a man in the same spot. the woman is just a POS for taking advantage of another persons kindness and generosity. that is the lowest type of scum behavior, and turns good people into regular people.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/14 06:44 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter