TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

crypticsage Archive

View 8 posts and 118 comments by crypticsage on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

If your focused on your workout, then it’s a non issue. Are you there to focus on yourself or to stare at others?
/r/MensRights24/06/26 04:56 PM
1

It’s not assault either. The post reads that she gave him a slap on the butt in a flirtatious manner. It’s something he may not be ready for or maybe he’s never experienced it before from a prior relationship or maybe it’s his first relationship. Regardless, all he would need to do is communicate with her and reach an understanding. It’s two weeks into a committed relationship.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 11:55 AM
0

And again to the point. She’s obviously gotten more comfortable in the relationship and he hasn’t. However, the action itself is not an equivalent to sexual assault. The only thing lacking in this post is that he has not communicated to her and it caught him off guard when she did it. Nothing more than this needs to happen.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 11:50 AM
0

You seem to be ignoring the part where I say multiple times that he needs to communicate with her and that nothing posted indicates that happened. You also seemed to have ignored the part where I stated my response would be the same if the roles were reversed.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 10:41 AM
-2

And nothing in the post says he mentioned anything to his gf. In every relationship, someone will always do something that makes the other uncomfortable. A healthy relationship means they talk and go past it. They aren’t strangers to each other, certain things are implied when you’re in a relationship. It’s up to each of them to make sure to communicate when something happened they didn’t expect and/or didn’t like. What’s next? She comes up from behind him and surprises him with a hug? Because s…
/r/MensRights13/05/26 09:59 AM
6

To marry or not to marry was not something I was dead set on. I was honest with her when we started dating. She told me she’d like to get married one day and I told her that I’m not opposed to it if things go well while we are dating and getting to know each other. Pretty early on I had a feeling things would be good. These are just some examples of what happened. On our first date, she offered to cover her expenses. I told her that since I invited her, I was paying. On our second date, she invi…
/r/MensRights12/05/26 10:57 PM
-3

Hot take: It’s a GF of two weeks. Without more context, it sounds like she’s gotten more comfortable around him and he hasn’t yet. It doesn’t mean she’s abusive. A conversation needs to be had between them. Nothing you posted screams assault or abuse. Yes, even if the roles are reversed my comment would remain the same.
/r/MensRights12/05/26 10:48 PM
3

What exactly is woke?
/r/MensRights12/05/26 12:35 PM
5

I’ve never seen this show so I know now thing about her character. But that last line in the clip tells me the character is an idiot. There are better ways to respond if you really are advocating for a positive change. Based on this clip alone, I can make the assumption that the character doesn’t believe what she’s spouting and only saying it for fame.
/r/MensRights12/05/26 12:34 PM
9

I remarried. My ex is crazy. False accusations, attempted to take my kids from me. It’s been about 13 years and still she can’t seem to move on. I was pushed to a point of depression. Was definitely traumatized. Movies and games that show fathers and their relationships with their children sometimes hit me hard. Example, the game Pragmata had me in tears recently. I pushed through the fear and eventually met someone. We’ve been married eight years now. My first marriage lasted two. There’s no sh…
/r/MensRights12/05/26 12:09 PM
8

It won’t be for those of us in our thirties and forties. But the youngest generations will certainly benefit from it. An option that is not permanent and has shown no side effects since it’s not a hormonal option. I think this one has the best chance to make it to production than any other one has.
/r/MensRights26/04/26 02:07 PM
1

To be fair, twitch doesn’t take SA seriously for either gender.
/r/MensRights09/11/25 01:30 PM
14

Well it’s twitch. Seems they don’t do anything when anyone is assaulted. So I guess they are equal opportunity in that regard.
/r/MensRights26/10/25 04:03 AM
1

Sounds like a question for r/legaladvice. They have a rule that you can only pose questions that are affecting you directly and not hypotheticals. So if you know you were mentioned in the app, then you can pose the question on that subreddit.
/r/MensRights06/08/25 01:16 PM
6

Are you they type of person who believes a man can’t rape their wives as well?
/r/MensRights04/11/24 01:30 PM
1

Because it doesn’t add anything of substance to the film and removing it won’t remove anything of substance in the film.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 08:46 PM
1

Because it doesn’t add anything of substance to the film
/r/MensRights18/10/24 08:30 PM
1

Because it doesn’t add anything of substance to the film and removing it won’t remove anything of substance in the film.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 08:08 PM
2

It’s both. Low self worth coupled with not wanting to take advantage of someone that could be taken advantage of so easily.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 08:07 PM
1

We as the audience also see the movie from Forrest’s point of view. But if we saw someone like Forrest, and knew nothing more than he has a relationship with a woman who by all accounts is not intellectually disabled, you would think she was taking advantage of him. If she is leaving because she doesn’t want to burden him, then she’s seeing herself as potentially being an abuser. Doing to him what her father did to her.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 06:59 PM
2

Would it have been better if she remained with him in a romantic relationship? A woman taking advantage of a mentally challenged man. Reverse the roles. Bet the man would be labeled a rapist because the woman wouldn’t have the mental capacity to consent to a sexual relationship.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 12:54 PM
1

Leaving it or removing it doesn’t add/remove anything to the film.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 12:51 PM
0

Let’s also add in that if Jenny did remain with Forrest and any point of the film, you could make the conclusion that she is taking advantage of him. He is mentally disabled. Does he truly understand what it means to be in a sexual relationship? Reverse the roles and the man would certainly be labeled a rapist who’s taking advantage of a mentally challenged woman. If anything, she made a choice that shows she didn’t want to take advantage of him.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 12:49 PM
2

The OP never said she’s meant to be a good person. They are explaining the nuance of the situation. She’s made her choices because of her upbringing. The only person who was a friend to her was mentally challenged. If she pursued a romantic relationship with him, wouldn’t that be taking advantage of a mentally challenged person? Reverse the roles, would it have been ok for a man to have a romantic relationship with a mentally challenged woman?
/r/MensRights18/10/24 12:35 PM
9

Isn’t Forrest mentally challenged? Look at the nuances of each character. Would it have been ok for Jenny to stay with Forest in a romantic relationship? Reverse the gender roles and no one would have been ok with the guy being in a relationship with a mentally challenged person. Her having sex with him is about as close as rape as you can get if Forrest can’t comprehend it.
/r/MensRights18/10/24 12:26 PM
10

Instead of telling people what to do, you would help by pointing out which specific songs you are referring to. Music, like any other form of art, can be open to interpretation. You’re claim is one interpretation. But unless you can clearly state which songs you’re referring to and why you feel the interpretation is correct, no one is going to listen to you.
/r/MensRights04/10/24 06:52 PM
2

Perhaps no, but your are putting in writing why you’re choosing said candidate and also why the others are not qualified for the position. If they protest the decision, you are asking in email to provide guidance to why they believe first choice isn’t the best suited candidate. This also covers you when they blame you for making a selection you didn’t want to make. You clearly stated in writing prior who the first and second choice are and that anyone else hired that aren’t those, were not yours…
/r/MensRights28/03/24 03:59 PM
6

Just send the email that the following applicant (best qualified) is his first choice and state the following reasons why. If they have any questions, or comments, please reply back with the concerns with this candidate. Word it in a way that highlights the preferred candidate in the best light. Give a detailed process of how this candidate stood out from the rest. Maybe include a second pick should the first pick not accept or there is an issue with them.
/r/MensRights28/03/24 03:21 AM
-2

If your not willing to have that conversation to determine criteria, we can never keep them away from lunatics. You have to be willing to take baby steps to get to a reasonable solution. If we have to register and inspect vehicles, get licenses to drive them, then we can do the same with weapons. Since your just an average Texas guy, your input on gin regulation really doesn’t matter. The experts would be people who understand human psychology and can provide sabe guidelines.
/r/MensRights22/06/23 04:49 PM
11

The insane woman shouldn’t have been able to get a gun in the first place.
/r/MensRights22/06/23 04:22 PM
11

r/legaladvice
/r/MensRights18/03/23 01:07 PM
2

Have you posted on r/legaladvice? They might be able to help you further on this matter.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 04:44 AM
16

With blue tape
/r/MensRights02/02/23 08:58 PM
12

It’s been removed.
/r/MensRights25/01/23 03:09 AM
1

It’s not about less or more governance. It’s about the governance in the correct areas. The purpose of government is to work for the people. Not for corporations. Governance today takes in the best interest of corporations.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 05:12 PM
2

Corporations also need to be limited. In addition to making the minimum wage higher. A law should be implemented which sets a maximum pay ratio between the highest earner and lowest. Making sure to include bonuses, and extra earnings If we force corporations to actually pay their people, the economy will flourish. In education, schools are incentivized to creat administration positions instead of raising teacher salaries. Giving more money to a school district doesn’t translate to more higher pa…
/r/MensRights29/10/22 05:08 PM
1

Simply put, why do we place more value in materialistic things? This includes both men and women, why should you get paid less and be valued less for choosing a career that doesn’t produce materials?
/r/MensRights29/10/22 05:03 PM
1

Do you have a 401k that you pay into? The retirement plan that teachers get is paid into by the teachers salary. It isn’t in addition.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 05:01 PM
1

Have you looked at what that retirement is for teachers. It isn’t that great. I’ve worked in private, eduction, and state government. The best retirement comes from state government and university work. After that, your retirement investment in private sector. Schools are the worst for retirement. Yes, I know people that also worked in the education sector. Teachers, janitors, librarians, professors, administrators, information technology.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 04:44 PM
1

I give you an example that the people have direct impact on public school decisions. In Texas, there was a wide ban of books, why? Because the people were complaining. The administrators were worried about the wrong things and banned freedom of speech and expression for the students.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 04:38 PM
1

Maybe because both parents have to work to survive. It goes back to earning a living wage. You keep passing the blame to the people but look at where the money really is going.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 04:35 PM
2

The average for nurses is 56k. Not a starting figure. Insurance for teachers isn’t that great unless you’re talking about university professors. Have you actually read the insurance information? The cost is high, you have high deductibles that must be met first. So out of pocket expenses are ridiculous. Many are better off with the private insurance provided to the spouse. Time off, did you factor the extra hours they have to put in after school? Weekend work? Summer school? Why is it that for o…
/r/MensRights29/10/22 03:56 PM
3

Because private schools and charter schools have oversight right?
/r/MensRights29/10/22 03:49 PM
2

It doesn’t matter why they stay or not, we are hurting our children by not having fully staffed schools with actual teachers. That is a terrible expression to have. I do not want my kids to be taught by unqualified people. Raise teacher salaries, fill the classrooms and let’s get education where it needs to be.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 03:10 PM
0

I didn’t assume make or female teachers. I said teachers. I also didn’t say male or female nurses. I’m specifically talking about the specific careers. The issue regarding hiring of male teachers and child care workers is an independent issue and should be addressed as such. I also mentioned it because it’s a response to point 1 regarding the career choices women make. Yes it’s part of why they earn less, but those career fields need to be addressed at what wage is being paid. It’s not enough.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 03:07 PM
6

$56000 average a year is living well with a BS? The average for a nurse is $57,000 a year. Then you forget the hours they actually put in on a daily basis. To earn more that teacher would instead apply for an administrative position. We do not need a surplus of administrators. Same for the nurse. Most of the money in healthcare also goes to administration and not medical staff and equipment.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 03:03 PM
8

But that’s not how it works. Most school districts aren’t using increased funding for teachers. They use it to pay administrative staff. You browse job listings and you’ll see there’s massive positions available. Instead of deciding to pay them their worth, they are cramping students more and more to single classrooms.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 02:59 PM
-2

To reason number 1 you mentioned, those career fields could use an increase in pay. Nurses and teachers for example are an extremely important role to fill and I’m it’s no longer possible to earn a living wage in these positions.
/r/MensRights29/10/22 02:19 PM
1

All toilets occupied or restroom out of order.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 11:59 AM
0

If she did so what? I wouldn’t have known about it. She chose to have me. Many girls and women didn’t, like yours.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 05:50 PM
2

Allow abortions and we won’t be burdened with unwanted kids and forced births. This 10 year old had no choice in the matter. It was unavoidable for her. There’s been an arrest made regarding this girl in case you really believe it’s fake. An Ohio state law went into effect July 2019 which makes abortion illegal after the fetus heartbeat can be detected, which usually develops between five or six weeks after conception. No exceptions are made for "hard cases" such as rape, incest, or a fetus dete…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 04:50 PM
1

Immigrant or not immigrant, legal or not, the end result would be the same. 10 year old would have to seek abortion elsewhere and is not automatically granted an exception in Ohio. Rape is not exempt to receive an abortion.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 04:42 PM
1

An Ohio state law went into effect July 2019 which makes abortion illegal after the fetus heartbeat can be detected, which usually develops between five or six weeks after conception. No exceptions are made for "hard cases" such as rape, incest, or a fetus determined to possibly have down syndrome. The only "hard case" exception, according to ORC 2919.193(B) are in cases in which there is a medical emergency, defined in 2919.16(F) & (K): "serious risk of the substantial and irreversible impairme…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 04:39 PM
1

There’s been an arrest made and you’re claiming it’s fake?
/r/MensRights13/07/22 07:26 PM
-3

Or allow abortion since you can never account for all the reasons one might need one. This 10 year old should take accountability right? Edit: There’s been an arrest made regarding this girl. An Ohio state law went into effect July 2019 which makes abortion illegal after the fetus heartbeat can be detected, which usually develops between five or six weeks after conception. No exceptions are made for "hard cases" such as rape, incest, or a fetus determined to possibly have down syndrome. The only…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 06:00 PM
-4

Allow abortions and we won’t be burdened with unwanted kids and forced births. Edit: This 10 year old should take accountability right? There’s been an arrest made regarding this girl. An Ohio state law went into effect July 2019 which makes abortion illegal after the fetus heartbeat can be detected, which usually develops between five or six weeks after conception. No exceptions are made for "hard cases" such as rape, incest, or a fetus determined to possibly have down syndrome. The only "hard …
/r/MensRights13/07/22 03:24 PM
5

Anecdotal. Seems you don’t understand who evidence works.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 02:03 PM
1

The OP is the one who made a very specific claim. It’s on the one making these claims to prove they are factual. You can’t prove a negative. Meaning nothing provided can show the claim is false, but if it is true no one should have any trouble providing proof. It’s like stating a unicorn is real. If I challenge that claim, it’s on the one who claimed it to prove it’s real. Nothing I present will ever prove a unicorn is not real.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:57 PM
0

And again you’ve failed to provide any evidence of your claim despite me asking three times now. Stick to facts. Not opinions.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:53 PM
6

Not according to the psychology today the redditor shared in an attempt to prove high counts for women are the cause for relationships not working out. However those same studies showed that higher counts for men caused relationships to fail. So no, men aren’t respected by women when they also have high counts.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:52 PM
2

Did you read them? Huffington post has a broken link to the study. Probably taken down because it was flawed. Daily mail doesn’t link the study. The iastate link doesn’t load. The psychology today studies don’t specifically talk about women. In fact it also talks about high counts of men as a factor for relationships not working out. Care to try again?
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:48 PM
3

Did you get hit on the head when you were little?
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:40 PM
6

I asked for stats and proof and you’ve not provided it. Just made a claim without evidence to back it up. I will say this again, why talk about past numbers? This is to both men and women. Don’t ask the question and just be with the person because of your compatibility with them or don’t be with them if you aren’t compatible.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:35 PM
-4

You got evidence of your statement. Have you thought that the men that do care so much about numbers are because it’s a learned behavior? Not a healthy one to be shaming someone for having higher numbers than you.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:33 PM
4

Tell me something, does it matter how many women a particular man has slept with as well? Do you have any actual stats to show. Since you’re making the claim, do you have proof if it?
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:26 PM
-7

There’s other factors to consider why someone may have higher counts. Examples would be there were no serious relationships. FWB do exist for example. So do non-monogamous relationships. It is only infidelity if you do it behind your partners back and betray their trust. Numbers alone don’t tell you anything.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:24 PM
-9

To everyone. Why does anyone care how many people someone was with before you? The number itself does not matter.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:06 PM
5

I don’t understand why anyone talks about body counts. It’s irrelevant.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:03 PM
1

There aren’t family restrooms everywhere.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 01:19 PM
3

I have daughters. Plenty of times I couldn’t take them into the mens restroom and they couldn’t hold it anymore. No way I was going to let them suffer so I took them in to the women’s restroom. They did their business and we left. Yes they were small enough that warranted me to go in. No there were no family rooms.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 02:25 AM
15

This could have ended really bad. I wonder how the lie was discovered?
/r/MensRights11/05/22 06:45 PM
1

Biology might not be the same but one thing is certain, breasts are not sexual organs. The sexual organs are prohibited from being exposed for both sexes. What, you think a kid is going to get traumatized from seeing breast’s? If so, then they’ll get trauma from man boobs too.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 03:10 AM
1

Double standards exist because we allow it to exist. Double standards will not end until people allow it to end. This includes going topless anywhere. ​ Many public places do not allow men to be topless in their establishments. This means both men and women are equal in this regard. If an area allows toplessness, it needs to apply to both sexes. No excuses. ​ this is the most petty form of inequality i've seen people complain about. ​ Petty or not it matters. There are plenty of issues for men a…
/r/MensRights15/04/22 11:14 PM
11

Good for women in this front. Equality is about that, equal rights for everyone. They should have the option if men have it as well. Let’s not assume it will become a problem until it actually does. Unless you’re following someone and stalking them, there should really be no repercussions for it.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 03:47 PM
1

No me la sé.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 03:07 PM
1

De que hablas?
/r/MensRights14/04/22 12:55 PM
1

Yep
/r/MensRights14/04/22 12:47 PM
1

Yep
/r/MensRights14/04/22 12:42 PM
1

Yep
/r/MensRights14/04/22 12:40 PM
1

Yep
/r/MensRights14/04/22 03:40 AM
1

Yep
/r/MensRights14/04/22 03:25 AM
1

Yep
/r/MensRights14/04/22 03:22 AM
1

And you’re in denial.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 03:21 AM
1

It’s 0% enforceable. Every person that is allowed to enter a bathroom is a risk of being wrong. You don’t even want to look at the pictures to see for yourself. You’re in denial.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 03:14 AM
1

I mean you did my examples wrong. At least one of the ones that looks like a man would be entering the women’s bathroom based on genitalia. Same for at least one of the ones that looks like a woman.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 03:12 AM
1

Cost prohibitive. It’s cheaper to have separate bathrooms. Why? If you had universal ones, you’d have to ensure separate stalls for everyone. Mens restrooms sometimes just have a small stall separating two urinals and nothing else. But it is certainly a solution.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 03:09 AM
1

So it’s not enforceable. So saying everyone should go to the bathroom based on their sex at birth is baseless.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 03:05 AM
1

Ok prove it then. How would you enforce it? In this situation, you can only go by looks.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 02:59 AM
1

I’m merely proving why you’re wrong. What you want is 0% enforceable and trying to argue for enforcement is pointless. I provided examples. Didn’t say anything about personality. You did. All I did was share pics of men and women. Tell me which bathroom each one should use. It’s not a hard request.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 02:54 AM
1

Again you’re veering off course. I am only presenting you examples of men and women. Which bathroom should they use? Why do you refuse to answer it? Afraid you can’t tell?
/r/MensRights14/04/22 02:51 AM
1

So you can’t make a valid argument.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 02:42 AM
1

How. You’ve yet to identify the examples I gave as to which bathrooms to use. You’re avoiding it.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 02:37 AM
1

It can be enforced. Again, you’re avoiding the question. The bathroom situation can be enforced 0%. So saying things like anatomy should be the factor has no bearing.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 02:36 AM
1

You’re Missing the point. Speeding has a defined set of rules that are verifiable without violation/invasion of privacy. Same for littering. Everything you mentioned can be enforced. You can’t say the same for this situation. You’re just skirting the question at hand without answering it.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 02:24 AM
1

Be specific. Which one goes where? If we are going to enforce it you have to be able to say they are in the wrong room.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 10:14 PM
0

I asked specifically which one should go to which restroom. You didn’t answer it.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 09:56 PM
-1

You didn’t get them all correct. If you decided each one based on facial structure, then you showed that you can’t be sure 100%.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 12:51 PM
0

Yet you didn’t answer the question I asked.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 12:49 PM
1

See this example.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 06:06 AM
2

Two of them are trans. OP said they don’t want someone with a penis in the women’s restroom and vice versa.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 06:03 AM
2

I’m just going to say it simply, if the person in question looks like a woman, should that person use the men’s restroom or the women’s restroom? You have no idea what the person has between the legs. Same question if the person looks like a man. Which restroom should this person use? What about this person? Then there’s this person. and this person. Here’s another person. and one more person. Which one should each of them go to? Edit: Added more for good measure.
/r/MensRights13/04/22 05:43 AM
41

I believe encouraging someone to commit a crime is itself a crime.
/r/MensRights12/03/22 07:59 PM
-2

What would stop said person from just paying rent or mortgage with that money and any other money on her. Nothing for the children.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 06:26 PM
4

NTA Courts made a ruling and to go against the ruling can lead to being charged with violating that order. If the ex continues to harass the father about it, he potentially could file a harassment charge against her. He could even request the courts to order for communications to go through a third party company that keeps records for parents. This would force the ex to watch her tone and what she says to him. Any communication through other means would also constitute a violation of orders. Pro…
/r/MensRights24/02/21 10:23 PM
4

Since it got deleted, here’s a link to the archive of the post for you to read.
/r/MensRights09/01/21 01:20 PM
1

Good thing this exists.
/r/MensRights09/01/21 01:19 PM
6

That was fast. Only four hours.
/r/MensRights09/01/21 03:24 AM
31

I feel like if the rapist does go to jail, people won’t believe reality is any different. They’ll see it and have a bias that female abusers are punished.
/r/MensRights31/10/20 11:55 PM
121

If they do this scenario, then it’s not really highlighting the issue entirely. If you want the point to really hit home, the audience needs to sympathize with the victim and when it ends, cause the person to really feel that there is injustice in the current system. Maybe things can change for the better if a more realistic ending is shown.
/r/MensRights31/10/20 11:51 PM
1

Not just a poll as an option though. I’d like to see something like Vasalgel make it to market. An injection that lasts 10 years, easily reversed, and no side effects? Yes please.
/r/MensRights01/10/20 10:44 PM
2

Whats FDS?
/r/MensRights24/09/20 01:32 AM
26

I sure hope you’re being sarcastic.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 08:30 PM
71

Based on the comments, progress maybe? Most of the comments are supportive.
/r/MensRights23/09/20 07:43 PM
4

This should be pinned so it’s always available to anyone.
/r/MensRights19/01/19 03:23 PM
2

Mind if I copy your post?
/r/MensRights12/06/14 04:00 AM
2

So we should start posting random idiots on facebook with the names not blocked out?
/r/MensRights26/01/14 09:40 PM
2

This is how I think it should be to allow for true equality. Both want the child, then great nothing needs to be done. Mother wants the child and father doesn't, he needs to be able to opt out immediately before the child is born. Father wants the child but the mother doesn't. He gets custody and she opts out of the childs life after birth. Neither pays for child support ever. If neither want the child, at this point the mother decides to either abort or send the child for adoption. If after the…
/r/MensRights10/11/13 05:25 AM
3

I'm currently in a similar situation. I've been fighting a year and a half now with no end in sight. If you are successful, let us know.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 03:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter