~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| -4 | Cosmopolitan's Double StandardsWhen has looking at women in speedos been bad? Only SJW think it is bad. Are you one of those? /r/ohlympics We're just going to pretend that that, and the ten trillion other sources of scantily-clad athletes (both male and female) don't exist? Cosmo is my go-to source for hot chicks (and dudes) if I'm in a waiting room somewhere, so I don't think they have a problem with it. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/16 11:11 PM |
| -5 | Cosmopolitan's Double StandardsSince when has looking at pictures of physically attractive men or women been "objectification" of them? Maybe in the warped and twisted mind of a SJW'er but not in a normal human being. When the study was referring to "objectification" it was referring to the excessive focus on appearance and sexuality that may occur in unhealthy relationships, such as one where a male "boytoy's" dress and appearance is dictated by the female, or one where females are seen as subservient sex devices. You (and e… | /r/MensRights | 07/08/16 10:49 PM |
| -11 | Cosmopolitan's Double StandardsIt is. And an unfunny one at that. The link leads to this page: http://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/news/a30367/sexual-objectification-leads-to-coercion%20/?src=spr_TWITTER&spr_id=1440_82538380 Which leads to this page: http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2014/08/men-who-objectify-are-more-likely-to-coerce.html Which leads to this press release about a paper: http://m.pwq.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/07/31/0361684314544679.abstract Which I can guarangoddamntee nobody here has read. Our research … | /r/MensRights | 07/08/16 08:48 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter