TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

cuppycake_gumdrops Archive

View 0 posts and 23 comments by cuppycake_gumdrops on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I called incapacitated sex rape by law. Not drunken sex. There is a difference. You called drunken sex incapacitated sex so you could call it rape, moron. Intoxication is being over the legal blood alcohol limit. You called being between intoxicated and passed out "incapacitated." Any level of drunkenness over the legal limit is between intoxicated and passed out. Thereby, you called drunk sex "incapacitated" sex in order to call it rape. Now you're changing your tune and spewing more fabricated…
/r/MensRights12/12/14 07:14 PM
-1

Stop implicitly lying about the content of links. Nothing you linked supports your assertion. It would be in your best legal interest to stop having sex with incapacitated persons. Eat shit and die, you patronizing chucklefuck. I'm a thirty year old woman who, over the last decade, has voluntarily and pleasurably had plenty of the drunken sex you're trying to call "rape via incapacitation."
/r/MensRights12/12/14 07:08 PM
2

That doesn't change the fact that it is the law, in the US and much of Europe. "Incapacitated (more drunk than Intoxicated [intoxicated = over the legal blood alcohol limit], less drunk than Passed Out)" = cannot consent. No, it is not the law, as I already said, and as you would do well to note. Stop lying.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 06:30 PM
3

"Incapacitated"(re: more drunk than Intoxicated, less drunk than Passed Out) sex is rape. No, it isn't. And no, that's not the law in many places (if any -- I suspect such laws would have more nuance than you're providing). And no, it shouldn't be the law anywhere.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 06:10 PM
15

It gave a scenario in which a man and a woman had sex after she initiated and passively consented, and in which the term "tipsy too" equated his level of drunkenness with hers, yet still he was expected to count her drinks for her like a parent. There are many reasons attractive straight women are less likely to be Feminists, and here's one: we actually have sex with men and understand the validity of (and even embrace and enjoy) passive consent.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 05:19 PM
40

Why are grown adults accepting this infantalizing intrusion of institutional power into their bedrooms? To hell with whether this was a "policy violation" -- this is not a thing to make policy about in the first place! This is none of anyone's goddamn business but the people involved! The minute we get the Christian church out of the bedroom, the Feminist church sticks their foot between door and jamb and shoves their way in to dutifully fill the void. Fucking hell.
/r/MensRights12/12/14 04:53 PM
1

No, dude, diamonds cut glass. You take an old window, you cut the glass with the diamond into the shape/size you want, yeah?
/r/MensRights01/12/14 03:48 PM
4

'Advertising and promotions managers', they have a lot of traffic accidents. They're just taking some well-intentioned advice.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 03:29 PM
1

'Men's rights' group behind sexual assault posters Controversial ‘counter-campaign’ meant to encourage discussion: Men’s Rights Edmonton
/r/MensRights01/12/14 04:52 AM
1

http://i.imgur.com/FbeuJT1.jpg
/r/MensRights01/12/14 04:49 AM
1

As if the new husband himself isn't enough. Harumph. I've known a few ring showoffs. I felt so awkward. What do you want me to say, lady? How is this interesting? Harumph.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 05:47 PM
1

I don't understand why more women don't want a simple band, maybe a little smaller, to match their husband's wedding ring. This is about being a couple, a match, together. The rings should match in style, if not perfectly. Also, yes, engagement rings are stupid and sexist and I've made good on that belief -- engaged two years, no ring desired. Waste of money averted.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 05:20 PM
1

Bet you could rig up a diamond to open your stockpile of tin cans. And fashion yourself a glass shiv to deal with the looters.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 05:17 PM
7

The insignia on the bottom right says this is endorsed by the police in the area. "Drunk" for police means "over the legal limit," not "passed out or incapacitated," correct? Any reasonable person would view it that way. So is that the law in the UK - that a person (er, woman) who has sex while over the legal limit has been raped? If not, how can the police endorse this? Edit: Question answered: Vera Baird, notorious radfem and ex-MP, is now police and crime commissioner in the area affected. (T…
/r/MensRights30/11/14 05:06 PM
5

Were the "journalist" to be so inquisitive as to ask for proof, it would be considered victim blaming and thereby misogynistic.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 03:37 AM
7

The room was pitch-black inside. [...] tripping her backward and sending them both crashing through a low glass table [...] a heavy person on top of her [...] and another person kneeling on her hair, hands pinning down her arms, sharp shards digging into her back [...] She remembers every moment of the next three hours of agony, during which, she says, seven men took turns raping her The person who made up this story made the room pitch black so there would be no pressure to identify any assaila…
/r/MensRights30/11/14 03:30 AM
2

So basically, Piers Morgan is the English male equivalent to Nancy Grace?
/r/MensRights29/11/14 05:10 PM
2

Windsor.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 05:00 PM
9

Foreskin protects the glans. Without this protection, the glans becomes scaly and bumpy rather than supple and soft, and loses sensitivity. The foreskin also contains a lot of dense nerve tissue itself, so removing it decreases sexual sensitivity in that way as well. Circumcision is linked to impotence in older men. Circumcision makes it difficult/impossible for men to masturbate without lubrication. This causes frustration in men who now have difficulty masturbating as often as is healthy. Circ…
/r/MensRights25/11/14 04:55 PM
3

I'm so surprised that you're from Toronto. It's like Canada's Portland.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 04:48 PM
0

They could easily have held their Toilet Day on another day. International Men's Day was declared in 1992 and re-initialized in 1999. World Toilet Day was declared in 2001. This very much looks not just tactless, but deliberate. Then they make the day about the harms men are accused of doing to women to add insult to injury. you would think they could have also said something about IMD. That would remove plausible deniability.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 08:24 PM
0

And we mustn't forget the UN's approach to Men's Day.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 08:01 PM
4

"Reclaimed"? Forget it. We need women's rights and men's rights, no "ism"s. "Ism"s just invite complications and resource wasters.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 07:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter