TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

curious67 Archive

View 185 posts and 977 comments by curious67 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
767

curious67/r/MensRights16/08/12 03:59 AM
737

curious67/r/MensRights06/07/12 03:27 PM
526

curious67/r/MensRights18/08/12 10:30 AM
487

curious67/r/MensRights10/08/12 09:28 AM
362

curious67/r/MensRights11/07/12 11:25 PM
315

curious67/r/MensRights15/07/12 10:32 AM
239

curious67/r/MensRights02/01/12 10:48 AM
165

curious67/r/MensRights21/06/11 06:17 PM
156

curious67/r/MensRights31/10/12 10:01 AM
134

curious67/r/MensRights30/09/12 01:11 AM
124

curious67/r/MensRights12/03/12 09:19 AM
116

curious67/r/MensRights09/03/12 01:44 PM
111

curious67/r/MensRights11/04/11 08:40 PM
103

curious67/r/MensRights23/08/11 09:56 PM
94

curious67/r/MensRights29/01/12 07:55 AM
92

curious67/r/MensRights16/07/12 06:54 PM
88

curious67/r/MensRights25/06/11 12:13 PM
86

curious67/r/MensRights12/07/12 12:38 AM
80

curious67/r/MensRights07/10/12 10:58 AM
80

curious67/r/MensRights01/05/11 10:53 PM
79

curious67/r/MensRights08/10/12 01:16 AM
75

curious67/r/MensRights25/06/11 01:53 PM
67

curious67/r/MensRights04/02/11 10:48 AM
65

curious67/r/MensRights18/03/11 09:28 AM
65

curious67/r/MensRights23/05/11 11:11 AM
64

curious67/r/MensRights17/07/11 10:07 AM
62

curious67/r/MensRights06/04/11 11:55 AM
55

curious67/r/MensRights11/07/11 12:50 PM
51

curious67/r/MensRights10/04/11 12:28 PM
47

curious67/r/MensRights03/09/12 03:08 PM
45

curious67/r/MensRights08/04/11 02:20 PM
45

curious67/r/MensRights24/06/11 02:06 AM
42

curious67/r/MensRights26/04/11 12:17 AM
41

curious67/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:44 AM
41

curious67/r/MensRights10/03/12 09:59 AM
38

curious67/r/MensRights28/06/12 08:15 AM
36

curious67/r/MensRights14/05/11 03:18 PM
36

curious67/r/MensRights18/02/12 08:25 AM
34

curious67/r/MensRights16/01/12 12:17 PM
34

curious67/r/MensRights31/05/12 09:53 PM
33

curious67/r/MensRights27/02/11 02:55 PM
33

curious67/r/MensRights11/05/11 12:45 PM
29

curious67/r/MensRights25/07/12 10:23 AM
29

curious67/r/MensRights06/10/12 09:16 AM
28

curious67/r/MensRights02/10/12 03:49 AM
28

curious67/r/MensRights22/06/12 08:39 AM
27

curious67/r/MensRights01/08/10 07:02 PM
27

curious67/r/MensRights29/05/11 10:32 AM
25

curious67/r/MensRights18/07/11 09:35 AM
24

curious67/r/MensRights28/07/11 02:41 AM
24

curious67/r/MensRights16/08/12 03:51 AM
24

curious67/r/MensRights01/03/12 11:32 PM
23

curious67/r/MensRights05/12/11 05:20 AM
22

curious67/r/MensRights25/02/11 03:44 AM
22

curious67/r/MensRights19/05/11 10:19 AM
22

curious67/r/MensRights26/07/11 07:20 PM
22

curious67/r/MensRights24/12/11 08:34 PM
22

curious67/r/MensRights15/08/12 09:40 PM
21

curious67/r/MensRights28/09/12 09:48 PM
21

curious67/r/MensRights15/04/12 09:19 PM
21

curious67/r/MensRights14/06/12 07:10 AM
20

curious67/r/MensRights06/05/12 11:31 PM
19

curious67/r/MensRights20/08/12 03:28 PM
18

curious67/r/MensRights13/10/12 07:27 AM
18

curious67/r/MensRights17/02/11 09:38 AM
18

curious67/r/MensRights07/10/12 10:59 AM
17

curious67/r/MensRights15/07/12 12:33 PM
17

curious67/r/MensRights15/08/12 09:33 PM
16

curious67/r/MensRights12/03/12 09:20 PM
16

curious67/r/MensRights15/07/12 10:16 AM
16

curious67/r/MensRights31/03/12 01:50 AM
16

curious67/r/MensRights09/07/12 07:29 AM
16

curious67/r/MensRights05/08/11 07:45 PM
15

curious67/r/MensRights26/07/11 08:11 AM
15

curious67/r/MensRights13/03/11 11:59 PM
15

curious67/r/MensRights28/05/12 07:07 PM
15

curious67/r/MensRights15/08/12 03:22 PM
14

curious67/r/MensRights21/03/11 10:12 AM
13

curious67/r/MensRights13/06/12 10:35 AM
13

curious67/r/MensRights06/11/12 04:48 PM
13

curious67/r/MensRights08/02/12 11:24 PM
13

curious67/r/MensRights13/02/12 11:20 AM
13

curious67/r/MensRights15/07/11 03:00 PM
12

curious67/r/MensRights20/05/11 01:21 PM
12

curious67/r/MensRights04/10/12 12:11 AM
12

curious67/r/MensRights23/06/11 02:41 AM
12

curious67/r/MensRights25/04/11 05:44 AM
11

curious67/r/MensRights29/12/11 12:38 AM
11

curious67/r/MensRights12/10/12 10:17 AM
11

curious67/r/MensRights10/11/12 11:31 PM
10

curious67/r/MensRights16/01/12 03:15 PM
10

curious67/r/MensRights26/07/12 01:24 AM
10

curious67/r/MensRights30/08/12 09:15 PM
10

curious67/r/MensRights01/02/11 12:00 PM
9

curious67/r/MensRights24/02/11 10:32 PM
9

curious67/r/MensRights26/08/11 06:52 PM
8

curious67/r/MensRights03/10/11 04:36 AM
8

curious67/r/MensRights05/03/12 12:34 PM
8

curious67/r/MensRights17/07/12 07:58 PM
8

curious67/r/MensRights18/10/12 10:09 AM
8

curious67/r/MensRights07/03/12 08:40 AM
8

curious67/r/MensRights20/09/11 02:13 PM
8

curious67/r/MensRights11/04/11 11:35 PM
8

curious67/r/MensRights27/10/12 07:34 PM
7

curious67/r/MensRights07/02/12 01:24 AM
7

curious67/r/MensRights19/03/12 10:22 AM
7

curious67/r/MensRights24/07/12 10:07 PM
7

curious67/r/MensRights14/12/11 02:35 AM
6

curious67/r/MensRights27/08/12 11:15 AM
6

curious67/r/MensRights18/03/12 06:40 PM
6

curious67/r/MensRights01/02/11 12:33 PM
6

curious67/r/MensRights15/05/11 07:29 PM
6

curious67/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:36 AM
5

curious67/r/MensRights29/03/12 06:07 AM
5

curious67/r/MensRights05/02/12 03:00 AM
5

curious67/r/MensRights25/07/12 10:18 AM
5

curious67/r/MensRights26/04/12 09:14 PM
5

curious67/r/MensRights03/06/12 06:45 PM
5

curious67/r/MensRights07/10/12 08:26 PM
5

curious67/r/MensRights02/03/11 08:59 AM
5

curious67/r/MensRights11/06/11 09:29 AM
5

curious67/r/MensRights23/11/11 10:44 AM
4

curious67/r/MensRights04/08/11 10:06 AM
4

curious67/r/MensRights12/03/12 12:13 PM
4

curious67/r/MensRights26/10/11 07:35 PM
4

curious67/r/MensRights18/02/12 09:03 AM
4

curious67/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:35 AM
4

curious67/r/MensRights25/10/12 12:28 PM
4

curious67/r/MensRights18/03/12 09:43 PM
4

curious67/r/MensRights01/02/11 02:41 PM
3

curious67/r/MensRights13/10/11 04:56 AM
3

curious67/r/MensRights30/01/11 01:59 AM
3

curious67/r/MensRights16/10/11 09:50 PM
3

curious67/r/MensRights10/03/11 09:38 AM
3

curious67/r/MensRights18/05/11 08:28 AM
3

curious67/r/MensRights04/02/12 09:58 AM
3

curious67/r/MensRights22/06/12 08:40 AM
3

curious67/r/MensRights21/10/12 09:07 AM
3

curious67/r/MensRights06/10/12 09:14 PM
2

curious67/r/MensRights08/07/12 02:06 PM
2

curious67/r/MensRights15/02/12 07:08 PM
2

curious67/r/MensRights15/02/12 09:59 AM
2

curious67/r/MensRights20/04/11 05:51 PM
2

curious67/r/MensRights14/06/12 07:04 AM
2

curious67/r/MensRights09/07/12 06:44 AM
1

curious67/r/MensRights07/02/12 02:07 AM
1

curious67/r/MensRights05/03/12 11:05 AM
1

curious67/r/MensRights18/02/12 08:56 AM
1

curious67/r/MensRights31/01/12 12:38 AM
1

curious67/r/MensRights25/07/12 06:48 AM
1

curious67/r/MensRights17/02/12 11:59 PM
1

curious67/r/MensRights05/08/12 08:02 PM
1

curious67/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:02 AM
0

curious67/r/MensRights26/07/12 08:11 PM
0

curious67/r/MensRights21/04/12 12:31 PM
0

curious67/r/MensRights15/08/12 09:48 AM
0

curious67/r/MensRights10/12/11 11:38 PM
0

curious67/r/MensRights26/10/12 01:38 PM
0

curious67/r/MensRights09/08/11 05:30 PM
0

curious67/r/MensRights19/02/12 06:37 AM
0

curious67/r/MensRights04/03/11 10:18 AM
0

curious67/r/MensRights01/05/12 10:12 AM
0

curious67/r/MensRights06/07/12 06:59 PM
0

curious67/r/MensRights01/04/11 10:02 AM
0

curious67/r/MensRights17/02/11 09:35 AM
0

curious67/r/MensRights26/10/11 06:27 PM
0

curious67/r/MensRights02/01/12 04:23 PM
0

curious67/r/MensRights17/02/11 01:25 AM
0

curious67/r/MensRights19/03/12 12:49 PM
0

curious67/r/MensRights24/03/11 12:55 PM
0

curious67/r/MensRights10/11/12 11:03 PM
0

curious67/r/MensRights25/09/11 12:53 PM
0

curious67/r/MensRights25/09/11 11:26 AM
0

curious67/r/MensRights31/05/11 12:03 PM
0

curious67/r/MensRights01/01/12 10:56 AM
0

curious67/r/MensRights30/05/11 09:39 PM
0

curious67/r/MensRights18/03/12 09:31 AM
0

curious67/r/MensRights06/05/12 10:10 PM
0

curious67/r/MensRights10/03/12 08:18 AM
0

curious67/r/MensRights14/12/11 01:11 AM
0

curious67/r/MensRights19/08/12 11:38 PM
0

curious67/r/MensRights30/03/12 11:39 PM
0

curious67/r/MensRights17/06/11 04:53 AM
0

curious67/r/MensRights16/02/12 10:47 AM
0

curious67/r/MensRights16/02/12 09:47 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

the guy gives her his phone so she can type in her number
/r/MensRights10/11/12 11:43 PM
1

a) why does he have to retire for a discrete affair with a person that is not a safety hazard? Is this American moralism? b) if a women did the same thing, would she not be considered empowered and simply continue as if nothing had happened?
/r/MensRights10/11/12 11:20 PM
8

men should work triple time, to make up for the shortfall. Of course, for the same wage, or else it would be discrimination against the women on paid leave or on part time work. /s
/r/MensRights09/11/12 02:17 PM
1

there are serious proposals in Britain, from government organizations, to abolish women's prisons.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 09:43 PM
4

For those who’ve managed to miss the big story that’s rocked Britain during the past few days, let us give you a quick recap. A drunken girl sleeps with two boys. In the morning she discovers that she can't find her purse and goes to the police to report it. The girl says she remembers downing a few shots but she can't remember how she got into the hotel room she woke up in. Police easily find a man who rented the room and his friend – Evans. Both men admit sleeping with the girl but say it was …
/r/MensRights07/11/12 08:11 PM
3

More about evolutionary theory http://human-stupidity.com/science/evolution-psychology-darwin/evolutionary-psychology-reading-list http://cogweb.ucla.edu/ep/index.html Biased results you find in gender studies, women's studies, and most of sociology and anthropology when they venture beyond mere observation into issues like blank slate theory.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 09:05 PM
4

Google for "behavioral ecology" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_ecology is a derivative of Biology. Its mathematical models often explain animal behavior. Read Robert Triver's famous textbook. Evolutionary Psychology derives from there. It is about as scientific as you can get about explaining human behavior. I am happy to see The Blank Slate by Stephen Pinker cited here. It is clearly based on evolutionary theory and psychology. Stephen Pinker is a valued speaker at the Human Behavior a…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 08:56 PM
23

Shockingly a penny-grabbing five per cent of those quizzed said they would be happy to reverse roles and allow their female companion to fund their evening. Why is this so shocking? And penny-grabbing? If women are dollar-grabbing, why is it shocking when men are penny-grabbing? Is there no such thing as equality?
/r/MensRights06/11/12 08:43 PM
4

Google "battered woman syndrome" or Lorena Bobbitt. Mary Winkler Rita Graveline Susan Falls,
/r/MensRights06/11/12 05:31 PM
2

how come the above looks like a joke? of course men's day is NOT a national holliday and the United Nations does not give a damn. Men, wake up and fight for equality!
/r/MensRights06/11/12 05:21 PM
2

This comes right from the site of the United Nations: http://www.un.org/ecosocdev/geninfo/women/womday97.htm
/r/MensRights06/11/12 04:49 PM
-1

If she threatened to file a false accusation, that still does not mean he could not have raped her, after that threat. /s He could even have raped her after that, out of spite, or because he felt safe. You know, like in Strauss-Kahn case: if she lied about 10 details of the rape, that still does not prove that she was not raped
/r/MensRights31/10/12 12:10 PM
3

link?
/r/MensRights31/10/12 10:09 AM
3

This would just simply look like a clear cut case of total anti-constitutionality. How can any BS like that ever be put into law, much more how can this get past the Supreme Court? In any argument, it is always the Black who must be arrested. Even if he gets beaten into pulp, but if the White alleges the Black screamed at him at some point.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 10:08 AM
1

nothing because punishing her would scare off other victims from coming forward /s Additionally, he must have done something offensive to here before, so he had it coming /s Like John Wayne Bobbitt, who had to admit his guilt and ask his dick slicing wife for forgiveness
/r/MensRights29/10/12 08:49 AM
2

It may be that they applied one of the typical feminist rape definitions to arrive at the high domestic marital rape numbers. Like: "did you ever have sex when you were tired or not in the mood" Surveys of displaced Sri Lankan, northern Ugandan and Somali women in camps found that, in the vast majority of rape cases, women had been attacked by their partners, according to a report launched earlier this month. Even in Congo - dubbed the “rape capital of the world” for the prevalence and brutality…
/r/MensRights29/10/12 08:41 AM
22

Does not matter. The other pay gap makes sense, too. In the interest of equality of outcome, every brothel should be obliged to have 40% male prostitutes, like the typical quota in European boards of directors. Of course, it must be guaranteed that these men will be treated justly. That means that they receive the same amount of salary/commissions as women do. /s
/r/MensRights29/10/12 08:26 AM
10

which is what the entire abortion debate is about ..... and it is only 9 months pregnancy, then she can give it up to adoption. Unlike the man. If she does not want kids, she ought to get her tubes cut. That is the equivalent of what you say
/r/MensRights25/10/12 12:47 PM
21

which is what the entire abortion debate is about ..... and it is only 9 months pregnancy, then she can give it up to adoption. Unlike the man.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 12:46 PM
13

right. She has the ultimate say over her body. He does NOT have the ultimate say over his bank account and his body as working instrument. If he stops working he will be imprisoned. Like any slave ....
/r/MensRights25/10/12 12:45 PM
5

The question, the judge said, is whether she was fully aware of all Deion Sanders’ assets. This will now be the issue the attorneys will argue. When you marry, or have an affair, you MUST disclose all your financial issues to your wife!?
/r/MensRights25/10/12 12:42 PM
2

The problem is that all members are top executives of each country. The top of the top are always men, even in gender balanced boards where women have the vote too. Seems that the most qualified person is usually a man, due to male higher ambition, and more variance in all traits.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 12:37 PM
1

Gender Imbalance ECB President Mario Draghi and EU President Herman Van Rompuy have said that, while the gender imbalance calls for action, Mersch’s appointment to the Executive Board should go through to help the central bank tackle Europe’s three-year-old sovereign-debt crisis. The workload of the Frankfurt-based ECB has multiplied as it embarks on unprecedented unconventional monetary-policy measures and takes on extra supervisory roles. “It is urgent to fill that vacancy,” Van Rompuy told th…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 12:37 PM
2

took them 6 years to report the rape. Allege to have been raped very frequently over years. Wish there was more information as to PROOF of sex having happened and having been involuntary. And why did it take them 6 years to report (I know, this is blaming the victim. But maybe the guys are the victims) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-19930243 The two adult women made the allegations in 2005 over crimes committed against them between 1999 and 2001, when they were in their mid-teens. They s…
/r/MensRights22/10/12 01:07 PM
1

White men who are followed by men of any color rarely will convince campus security to give a general warning. Men can be followed, be it accidentally or on purpose. It does not matter if men don't feel safe. But any fear of a woman is cause for grave concern. Male fears are of no importance.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 12:41 PM
7

you might get police called on you. You might get arrested Don't take this too lightly
/r/MensRights21/10/12 11:24 AM
2

the entire abortion debate is totally uninformed, devoid of scientific knowledge and facts. Men should know. Most have opinions about abortions. They ought to know facts to be better prepared for discussions. Instead of blundering and telling senseless falsehoods like Biden and Romney. But yes, abortion is not a central topic for MRA. Or worse, MRA have very divergent opinions on abortion.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 09:39 AM
1

This was the top post on r/2x for an entire day. Normally they block or downvote human-stupidity.com posts. It was successful because the post cites very prestigious sources to prove its point. And because r/2x are most pro-choice (pro-abortion). Now you can perfectly be against abortion, but if you think life starts at conception and gets an immortal soul at that point, be aware that heaven is populated by over 50% of souls that never had a single neuron, never had a thought. So the idea of hum…
/r/MensRights21/10/12 09:14 AM
3

Stop over at www.Human-Stupidity.com . Always welcome to comment there. No size limitations. It is even possible to publish guest posts or collaborate in other ways.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 08:53 AM
3

Great link!!
/r/MensRights21/10/12 02:41 AM
5

actually, it is legally ok and quite normal to deny contact to a convicted kidnapper who is on an police arrest list. Once mother put herself outside the legal system, she can actually be removed from contact with the children. As you see, there are good reasons to keep them away Again, www.bringsearnhome.com is a good example
/r/MensRights21/10/12 02:38 AM
5

this is a serious problem. The mother, with the help of a slow legal system, brainwashed the children And the children simply grew accustomed to living in Australia. Sometimes courts think they ought to reward the kidnapper, because the kidnapping has taken so long that the kids started to like the place they were kidnapped to.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 02:36 AM
6

One in two rape accusations are false! Strauss-Kahn, presumed guilty, jailed, slandered without due process, escaped. Others are not so lucky! Way over 50% of rape accusations are false. 7.4% blatantly enough to prosecute (Bavarian Police research report) 4 out of 5 sexual abuse accusations are false (Austrian head of vice police) Note that this is without additional stimulation like monetary rewards or allowing abortion exclusively because of rape allegations.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 12:55 AM
3

Relevant: Brazilian parental alienation law Basically, once parental alienation is being diagnosed, custody is to be given to the party that does NOT obstruct family contacts. This might be the consequence of the famous case www.bringseanhome.com
/r/MensRights21/10/12 12:51 AM
5

great video. Still too tame. The mother seems to be a kidnapper, with arrest warrant in Italy. This is not being explained clearly.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 12:50 AM
3

"A legal quota ensures that work conditions will change in the workplace, for example, with a better balance for work and family through more flexible work schedules or strengthened training efforts," Saarland governor and CDU member Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer told the paper. It's the only way to put the necessary pressure on the business world to change, she added.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 03:39 PM
3

she only got convicted because Daddy Justice FORCED police to act. No witness volunteered to come forward, no police did automatically arrest her for assault. It took months of hard work to make police prosecute her against police's will. They don't want to prosecute important women for a little violence
/r/MensRights20/10/12 06:48 AM
5

oh, and that it is considered cutting edge feminism if, in a Lesbian marriage, the woman that did NOT contribute her womb to making the child, and is in no way related to the child, gets equal guardianship Compare that to rights of married men, .....
/r/MensRights18/10/12 07:00 PM
3

get yourself a microphone. Women get the right and guardianship even to frozen embryos. And when a frozen embryo gets destroyed, a man gets $3, the woman $ 50 000 of damages.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:58 PM
3

Youtube Spoof of “Catch a Predator”: Absurdity of Underage Sex Entrapment
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:54 PM
3

Certainly one of your fore-mothers had sex with 15 years or less or conceived your fore-grand-grand-father at tender ages like 14 Certainly happened many times in the last 1000 years. Only now there is this hysteria. If a 14 year old woman wants to have sex with a 25 year old man, it should not be government's business to interfere. Maybe parent's could choose to interfere. Sex laws traumatize 14 year old school boy who was happy to have affair with 26 year old woman See also http://human-stupid…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:53 PM
4

absolutely right. Just I would rather not resign. But people favoring lower age of consent laws (or abolishing them altogether with the libertarian argument that it is not the government's business, rather the parent's business) get attacked not only by feminists but by most mra's. See Sasha_ Human Stupidity wrote a lot about this http://human-stupidity.com/irrationality/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality
/r/MensRights18/10/12 06:40 PM
17

According to Troutt, the boys were given the iPad by the teacher, whose name was not released by ACS. The teacher told the boys they could browse around on it. The boy who was operating the iPad, not Troutt’s son, came across the topless photo of the teacher.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:47 AM
-1

Actually I meant to post this to r/Pedosexhysteria and accidentally posted this here. Because I know this is not well received here at r/mensrights. But as a fact, laws that almost exclusively snag men who behave in ways males have behaved for millennia (attraction and actual marriage to post-pubertal adolescents with 17, 16,15 year old women) should be of interest to mra. Rarely does an adult women get attracted to photos of teenage boys (except for Justin Bieber). And women go unpunished for e…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:33 AM
1

two more points: a) the taxis ought to be cheaper. As you know, women get paid 30% less, so it is possible to pass on these savings to the customers /s b) it is sad that the telegraph article did not mention "discrimination" anywhere c) it is sad the telegraph article mentioned raping taxi drivers, but forgot to mention false rape accusations against taxi drivers. http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/social-rules-habits/manipulate-language/rape-is-rape-is-rape-is-a-lie-joe-biden-20-different-…
/r/MensRights14/10/12 08:41 AM
15

very interesting point. Guess because I never thought that a fetus is a person, I never followed that logic to its end. So by republican logic women are given a free pass to murder if they were raped. Another effect of rape hysteria. Of course, by the basic assumption of the Republicans, God is the biggest abortionist there is. Way less then 50% of the fertilized eggs ever make it beyond 3 months of pregnancy. By nature alone, only by God's own intervention. Partially this is for miscarriage. Bu…
/r/MensRights12/10/12 09:53 AM
6

What world do we live in. Slaves had it better. They got food and shelter, and after working their 90 hour work weeks were allowed to relax in peace.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 09:24 AM
0

But the benefit of the doubt has long been removed from those accused of rape. They are guilty until proven innocent No due process for men accused of rape.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 07:35 AM
1

a) what kind of rape happen in nightclubs or right outside? This month a former Sapphire officer, Ryan Coleman-Farrow, faces sentence for failing to investigate rapes, pursue suspects or submit evidence over a three-year period. His activities have left 11 alleged sex attackers at large. b) why did that guy not investigate? Was he a crack head, totally lazy, a rape apologist? Or rather he did not pursue obvious false rape charges? This would deserve closer scrutiny and explanation. Oh, I forgot,…
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:30 AM
3

tell more about your police department. Which country, state, ..... Seems unusual, but a positive example
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:23 AM
2

How come women get offended by what goes on in the men's room? Do they check it out? Why do they interfere in the men's room design? Should men get offended by the talk that goes on in the women's room? Should men be offended that women always go off in pairs into women's rooms? After all, men don't pair up to go to the toilet! Finally, even the fact that the artist was of the right good inoffensive gender did not save the urinal.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 08:04 AM
3

Isn't that normal? Any quota system favors women to the detriment of men? It happens in the US, for sure.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 07:48 AM
3

I think you can find a man as a victim. A woman as the perpetrator, that should be virtually non-existent.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 07:41 AM
8

Why don't more victims become activists? Millions of normal slaving men, and dozens of famous prominent men. Men that suffer false allegations, slave to support lazy wives, pay millions to ex-wives. Where is the activism? This guy is a great example and should be widely propagated at AVM and Cotwa etc.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 01:18 AM
3

private enterprise gets sued too. Like Walmart by women .......
/r/MensRights07/10/12 07:00 PM
0

and hundred meter dash finals in the olympics
/r/MensRights07/10/12 06:58 PM
9

well if they fully meet the standards, great!
/r/MensRights07/10/12 06:56 PM
6

it is discrimination, especially if women get their special requirements that would get men excluded from admission In the case of Blacks, first the requirements get reduced, and then Blacks get admitted preferentially. And a bunch of Blacks and Hispanics get admitted retroactively, receive a few years worth or salary and promotions, and then will be the superiors of real active fire fighters who passed their admission test and worked for their salary. Really de-motivating. Like getting token wo…
/r/MensRights07/10/12 06:55 PM
7

From your link The lawsuit alleged that the exams had little to do with firefighting and instead focused on cognitive and reading skills. Because of the hereditary nature of the fire department, white candidates were recruited and supported throughout the application process by family or neighborhood contacts and whites consistently passed while minority candidates failed. exactly like feminists. The physical exams have little to do with firefighting and instead focussed on strengh and physical …
/r/MensRights07/10/12 06:52 PM
2

it gets worse http://documents.nytimes.com/new-york-city-firefighter-examinations here is an actual test. If you cannot answer these questions, you can not function efficiently as a firefighter. You can not learn, you can not put on your protection gear in the right order, etc.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 11:51 AM
16

There was a reasonable number of Blacks that passed the knowledge and intelligence part of the entrance exam and thus became firefighters. But not as many as the percentage in the population. And a few rare women would pass the physical requirements. The issue are lowered standards which endanger people and public security
/r/MensRights07/10/12 11:46 AM
4

She was famous [http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/prostitution/belle-de-jour-prostitution-financesdoctorate)[Belle de Jour, who financed her doctorate with prostitution work] Feminists would say this is never possible. A privileged highly intelligent woman enjoying sex work.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 11:33 AM
3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=COBLoeOR-Vw&feature=watch_response This is quite clear about SHE was an abuser
/r/MensRights07/10/12 09:34 AM
3

Great all the link collections here. One short way to explain it: Any company who would hire only women could save 30% of their wage expenses. They would annihilate the competition who unwisely waste their money hiring men. Profit oriented companies are totally stupid. They hire men and thus they pay 42% more. This does not happen, why? Because women do not earn 30% less for the SAME work. Additionally, men have more variance, a higher standard deviation of almost all measures. This is due to th…
/r/MensRights04/10/12 05:05 PM
1

guess if a man punches the wive to death, if is always detected. If women poison the man they often get away. And if they hire a killer, they also often remain undetected.
/r/MensRights04/10/12 09:23 AM
6

Warren Farrell keeps stressing this. That many men would be willing to do so. But very few women And that it is in women's genes, not to respect and not to get the hots for men that earn much less then the woman herself earns. That it is in women's genes to get the hots for the guy who brings in the meat, who is the powerful hero respected by other men and admired by other women. Because basically, women could earn as much as men, if they behaved competitive as men, made efforts like men, ..... …
/r/MensRights30/09/12 11:19 AM
13

actually, the quotas is "voluntary" in the sense that it is to avert mandatory government quotas, shaming by women's organizations. I think in the US it is to avert law suits (see Walmart). The effort to increase women's participation is "voluntarily" offered by industry to avert the threat of 40% mandatory quotas. In other words, it is about as voluntary as you paying taxes. It is to avert worse consequences.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 11:12 AM
4

your point is answered elsewhere. All is documented, except the exact method how the policy is executed. And the Siemens Engineer sheds some light on how this bias is being performed, how women are being fast-tracked to high ranking positions, how men are getting stuck and demotivated.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 03:45 AM
8

where can they go? into small companies, small enough not to be subject to these laws. Into other countries without such laws? where to?
/r/MensRights30/09/12 03:43 AM
6

good point. Of course, the privileged class (men) can not claim sexual harassment (this was meant as sarcasm, but is actually true according to political correctness). Actually, it is not even employer policy but government, European Union, United Nations policy.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 03:42 AM
5

thanks, you said it all. Not much I could add
/r/MensRights30/09/12 03:40 AM
9

this is a world wide tendency. In the US things are similar. There is a fair pay act that ensures unfair pay In Australia they enforced 30% or so raises in cozy professions mainly taken by women. It has different aspects but one main topic: women getting better pay then merit or the market would pay. Not sure if the Chinese, Koreans, Japanese are any wiser. All Westerners are doing the same kind of sexist anti male biased pay and promotion scheme
/r/MensRights30/09/12 03:38 AM
7

This is actually a new angle to MRA. An issue we don't hear about here. How do gender quotas actually get implemented. Reposting this answer at top level. Siemens is hearsay. Government planning quotas: German and European political facts with citations. "Voluntary" quotas instead of mandatory quotas: German politics, with citations. The only missing link is: which companies do implement these "voluntary" quotas, and how. And really, it is strange that we don't hear details about this, except he…
/r/MensRights30/09/12 02:06 AM
6

hearsay? Siemens is hearsay. Government planning quotas: German and European political facts with citations. "Voluntary" quotas instead of mandatory quotas: German politics, with citations. The only missing link is: which companies do implement these "voluntary" quotas, and how. And really, it is strange that we don't hear details about this, except hearsay. Seems it is shamefully hidden. We also know how Swedish and Norway companies suddenly have quotas for top ranking executives. How can that …
/r/MensRights30/09/12 01:42 AM
1

disgusting. He paid child support for years, knowing it is NOT his child. And then he got homeless and could not pay. Then he finally was imprisoned. And the Young Turk did not even mention that no man should go to jail for not paying support for his REAL child. Also according to the law he probably still owed back pay. He will probably always owe that. The women should pay back every cent she got due to fraud. Finally she should be imprisoned for fraud. Never will happen
/r/MensRights28/09/12 01:50 PM
1

you are lucky she does not threaten to say you raped her 2 years ago. that that was ongoing abuse since you were 7. She probably has no proof, but she will be believed if she is intelligent enough to lie well.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 01:55 PM
1

re-formulate: If a guy upsets you, it is his fault. Maybe you FEEL raped, if you feel raped you were raped. Trust your intuition. And if you were raped, you should file a report.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 01:53 PM
2

careful. they might take away your passport. Don't tell people you want to flee your OBLIGATIONS. /sarcdasm
/r/MensRights18/09/12 01:49 PM
1

well, if the guardians are women, police might be on their side. Read about "pussy pass" and "white knights"
/r/MensRights03/09/12 06:21 PM
1

the resignation was purely voluntary, against the wishes of the IMF and his political party. And they rushed to invite him back after the case was thrown out /sarcasm
/r/MensRights03/09/12 05:52 PM
1

Discrimination is real. Quota laws (or "voluntary" quotas) force employers to promote women ahead of more qualified and more hard working men. This is a fact (See Warren Farrell who explains the wage gap by women's choices of work hours, field of study, etc). Also see Roy Baumeister on men having more variance and thus being over-represented on the top and the bottom.
/r/MensRights03/09/12 05:44 PM
1

yes, he would be the French president, were it not for the unproven accusations. French presidential election was decided by Nafissatou Diallo. And by feminist rape and harassment laws
/r/MensRights03/09/12 05:41 PM
16

You bet he will pay child support till he is 34 years old. Weyandt gave birth to the child last week, Greenfield Township Police Chief Ron Givler said Wednesday. A few days later, he said, police arrested her on felony charges that include statutory sexual assault, aggravated indecent assault and corruption of minors. She remains in Blair County Prison in lieu of $20,000 bail. The child is staying with Weyandt's mother, Givler said. Givler said he couldn't comment on how Weyandt met her alleged …
/r/MensRights03/09/12 03:18 PM
11

You haven't understood feminism. If men are better at something, or over-represented, it MUST be discrimination by the patriarchy Ever read the discussion about the wage gap? Even the female feminist senators who sponsor the fair pay act were caught red-handed paying less to their female aides.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 09:50 PM
11

When Nature was criticized in 2005 for offering too few women the opportunity to write for the Insight section, Nature increased the proportion of women authors. Damn, artificial quotas even in "Nature"?
/r/MensRights30/08/12 09:28 PM
9

who is downvoting this? This ie exactly the basis for wage gap and gender differences in top CEO and political positions. Men have more ambition, invest more time. And (see Baumeister) men have larger Standard deviation (vairiance) on almost all traits. This means men are over-represented in the very top positions and at the very bottom.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 09:21 PM
3

'But the other cancers, cancers of the anus and increasingly the tonsil and tongue, there is no screening for them and no way of detecting them until they are proper cancers and they are more common in men than in women.' The professor, who lays out her argument in the journal Nature, believes that boys, like girls, should be vaccinated at the age of 12 or 13, before they are sexually active. Critics say that vaccination at such a young age fuels promiscuity. But the professor said that studies …
/r/MensRights30/08/12 09:19 PM
3

The viruses are passed on through sexual contact, and while the link to cervical cancer is well known, they are also the main cause of anal, tonsil and tongue cancer, wrote Margaret Stanley from Cambridge University in the UK. There is also evidence linking it to malignant penile and laryngeal tumours, she said in the respected journal. “One reckons that the viruses are the main cause of five percent of all human cancers,” she wrote, adding that men can pass on the viruses during sex.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 09:18 PM
2

from another article: http://www.spiegel.de/unispiegel/studium/universitaeten-im-iran-verbannen-frauen-aus-bestimmten-studiengaengen-a-851705.html Ayatolloa Chameini wants the population to increase from 75 million to 150 or 200 Million. Birth rate in Iran has dropped to 1.5 children per woman, below replacement rate. Well educated women play a major role in this.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 11:29 AM
1

here we go. affirmative action for men that are disadvantaged and discriminated against /s not sure if this should be sarcasm?? If it were women, this would not be sarcasm but official policy.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 11:18 AM
1

Three dozen universities across the country are not allowing women to study in 77 different majors, according to the Shafaf news website and Mehr News. The barred majors, which differ from school to school, reportedly include several fields in engineering, history and English. Women enroll in Iranian universities at higher rates than men, which puts the country at odds with the rest of the region, according a UNESCO study two years ago.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 11:17 AM
3

Why should a father with no visitation rights, whose is not informed about anything, pay child support to a child that is being kept away from him in FOSTER CARE? Against his will? This system is sick!! Though the social worker for the case noted in the file that Thomas was the father, he was never contacted, and his then 6-year-old daughter was placed in the foster care system. Thomas–whose fitness as a father was never impugned nor legally questioned–continued to receive and pay his child supp…
/r/MensRights20/08/12 09:13 PM
3

it is "nice" she wants to keep him away and does not want his money. Much worse if she takes him to the cleaners and keeps him away. /s is this sarcasm? probably true. The right thing would be for her to allow him to participate as much as he wants without him being required to pay money But the worst thing is: Don't get pregnant with a child that has a crazy father and thus most likely will inherit his craziness. Equvalent to men's Dont stick your thing in crazy ........
/r/MensRights20/08/12 09:04 PM
1

beware of common law marriage. That is even worse. After xx years, you are as if you were married. And no contract, no pre-nup. Usually worse then if you marry and do some good planning.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 08:17 PM
1

Please use google translator. The pimp kept their passports. They had to satisfy the pimp and work as call boys. The court said they knew what they were getting into when they came to Germany. They were not deceived. If they were not judged as youths they would have gotten much more then the 7 1/2 or 8 years in prison they received.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 03:32 PM
2

or maybe you are right. Consent has been re-defined too. So saying enthusiastic YES is not necessarily consent If she is drunk, or underage, even with ID stating she is old enough. It is still rape.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 10:29 AM
3

Rape is non-consensual sex? sorry, you are 50 years behind your times. http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/social-rules-habits/manipulate-language/rape-is-rape-is-rape-is-a-lie-joe-biden-20-different-types-of-rape
/r/MensRights20/08/12 10:28 AM
6

It is so easy. Women never lie about rape. And you must not embarrass her by cross examination. When a woman says she was raped, even if it is untrue, he deserves it. Because he must have done something to hurt the woman so she feels compelled to make such claims. /s
/r/MensRights20/08/12 10:16 AM
2

actually there are problems If Erin Pizzey is right, then a large percentage of women in shelters are "prone to violence". Add some men and there will be serious fights. You probably have to keep them apart.
/r/MensRights20/08/12 09:03 AM
2

men's rights issue? 51 men charged. no woman! For behavior that is natural to men, and very rare for women (having sex with a much younger partner, paying for sex) Because of laws that were sponsored and driven by feminist agenda (outlawing prostitution, increasing age of consent) Hope you see this is a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 11:42 PM
1

thanks for that clarification. So among males, 98% beta males are minority, and alpha males are the majority? I am starting to understand feminist argumentation.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 07:12 AM
6

we were talking about SHOPPING If it is photographing fully dressed, also no offense If you photograph your daughter in lingerie in the department store, this is not being discussed here. Just totally normal behavior, if done by a woman
/r/MensRights18/08/12 06:16 PM
37

Should Black men be allowed to sit next to white women? /s a bit more shocking: Note that it is of no interest if statistics might truly show that there are much more black men raping white women, then white men raping black women. The above rule is just ILLEGAL and violates civil rights. We don't allow a group to be blamed for behavior of a criminal minority. compare also should men be allowed walk behind women on dark streets at night
/r/MensRights18/08/12 10:42 AM
1

25 hottest sex offenders any boy wishes to become a rape victim of Even if mother cheated, lied, or raped: father always pays child support unable to consent to sex, able to consent to 20 years of child support slavery Some more info and lots of links can be found here http://human-stupidity.com/irrationality/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality but you have to dig. sorry for not precisely answering your questions about numerical statistics. All this is more anecdotal. There is a site dedicated to fem…
/r/MensRights18/08/12 10:38 AM
2

this pill could be an alternative to vasectomy. Or for men that would accept becoming infertile. Because they really don't want children.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 04:40 AM
2

more here by the very researcher. He states that feminists are violently opposed to male contraceptives. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JymN5yu-K_o
/r/MensRights16/08/12 03:53 AM
2

shocking. One main topic is that feminists want to repress male contraception. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JymN5yu-K_o this video here looks very credible to me. I do speak portuguese. It says the male contraceptive pill has been invented long ago, contains dirt cheap materials deriving from leftovers of cotton production. http://malecontraceptives.org/methods/gossypol.php critical analysis here, saying there are side effects, but mainly lasting infertility.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 03:49 AM
18

yes. And think of the women! It is unfair to use technology to remove women's right to choose the genetic father, and the paying father.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 02:34 AM
7

A major, major, main stream business journal telling the truth. Bloomberg are the editors of BusinessWeek. Hear, hear. Maybe Obama, Clinton, and European politicians will read that magazine? There is very little that individual employers can do about any of these issues. They can’t make men do more housework, or pick majors for women. Nor can they reasonably be asked to adjust their salary schedules to make up for those choices. Yet the gender-gap discussion always centers on holding employers a…
/r/MensRights15/08/12 09:53 PM
3

The systemic denial of female sexual abuse is one of the scandals of our times. While in recent years the issue of male paedophilia has been placed firmly at the forefront of public debate in Britain, with endless high-profile media and Government campaigns bringing this formerly underground issue into the public spotlight, it seems that the involvement of women in cases of child molestation is an enduring taboo, and in order to break that wall of silence we must start by addressing a series of …
/r/MensRights15/08/12 09:43 PM
5

I found an article on the same topic, that was not from Jezebel. Still, Jezebel linked to it, and only thus I found the article. http://jezebel.com/5335061/sexual-abuse-by-women-the-crime-no-one-wants-to-investigate (Explanation: I just committed a sacrilege by posting a link from Jezebel about the same topic)
/r/MensRights15/08/12 09:41 PM
3

No clue how such an article made it into Jezebel. Maybe the author was actually interested in children's welfare and not in protecting women at all cost. Sorry for posting a Jezebel article. The article is from 2009, and seemingly no-one ever posted it on any subreddit. Probably because the regular Jezebel reader did not like it, and mens rights would not venture there to read it.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 09:35 PM
2

They failed to heed Human Stupidity's advice: Get a lawyer before courting: 34 precautions before risking sex with a woman Get a lawyer before sex: 27 precautions before risking sex with a woman It is essential to check ID, to check if the ID is valid. And to do a detective background check. Because even if the ID is a valid government emitted ID, in the US' strict liability law this does not matter. Even if the government dupes you by emitting a false ID, you still are a child rapist. And then …
/r/MensRights15/08/12 09:52 AM
1

relation to rights of men: abortion sexual tourism getting world wide attention for their cause by taking off the blouse
/r/MensRights05/08/12 09:17 PM
1

it would be good if you told them BEFORE so they can avoid to get raped. This would do them more good. But thanks to slut-walk activists, me must not tell them. And believe me, if you pass out drunk in the worst part of town with a wallet full of cash and gold chains all over, you will be victim-blamed. First you will be blamed by your insurance, but police will tell you to be careful too.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 12:51 PM
1

I know, the re-definition of the word consent. Our language has been destroyed by feminist deconstruction. I meant the woman consented in the old fashioned sense of the world. She said an enthusiastic yes to sex. But yes, in the modern sense of the word, a enthusiastic consent, with witnesses and a signed paper, is invalid if not accompanied by an alcohol and drug test. Get a lawyer before courting: 34 precautions before risking sex with a woman
/r/MensRights05/08/12 12:32 PM
1

http://theantifeminist.com/the-myth-of-sex-trafficking/ http://theantifeminist.com/feminists-own-study-shows-no-link-between-sports-events-sex-trafficking/
/r/MensRights05/08/12 10:57 AM
2

actually, there are plenty of burglaries that are purely of convenience. If the door were not open, an opportunity burglar would not commit the crime ‘It’s not alcohol that causes rape, although it’s a vulner- ability factor. It’s rapists that cause rape.’ Not true in the case of drunk consensual date rape. The woman, most likely, would not have consented, and the (consensual date rape) would not have happened. Simply like that. Or she would have had sex anyway, even if sober. Still in that case…
/r/MensRights05/08/12 10:51 AM
0

I'm a retired police officer. I teach my three daughters and my son to not put themselves in positions where a monster can get to you. In my 40 years of service, I have seen the body of a teenage boy who walked into the wrong side of town and got knifed for it, the body of a man who was beaten for his bank card outside of an ATM late at night, and the half naked body of an elderly woman who had only wanted to get a breath of fresh air and went outside at pitch night to walk alone on a nature tra…
/r/MensRights05/08/12 10:47 AM
1

of course, if you invite someone into your home to take some stuff, if s/he can prove that it is no burglary.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 10:41 AM
0

"Reclaim the night" money-slut walk in gang area @2am. We don't deserve to be told to leave our cash and Rolex at home to avoid being victimized. If a man (or woman) leave the car unlocked, walk around with expensive jewelry and wads of 100 $ bills in a bad neighborhood, or if they pass out drunk with lots of cash and gold in a bad neighborhood, they would certainly be victim-blamed by insurance and by police and friends. It still is theft/robbery. But perpetrated on a person that does not take …
/r/MensRights05/08/12 10:35 AM
2

unfortunately, this is college policy. Men's lives get destroyed. This is not theory It is the LAW. Men get convicted of 5 second rape, of she consented but was tipsy rape, etc. It is not just theory, it became the law Rape is rape is rape" is a lie, Joe Biden! 20 different types of rape!
/r/MensRights04/08/12 06:52 AM
4

getting women punished for consensual rape might be a political goal to get women activists to repeal stupid rape re-definitions. It is not a therapeutic method to help an insightful understanding woman in her relationship woes.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 06:48 AM
5

right. But please fight to get the feminist rape definition repealed. It gets men imprisoned. It creates terror regimes in college. It gets "rapists" raped in prison. And it confuses people who agree to harshly punish "rapists" who had consensual sex while both were drunk.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 06:45 AM
2

the problem really is the feminist re-definition of "rape", which should be undone to keep the word "rape" meaningful. Most people still think rape is forcible rape-rape. So she was pressuring a man to have sex, based on a false theory that men always like that. And he likes blow jobs. Face the truth, negotiate what sex life you want. Options are endless: exchange blow jobs for sex, decide you are incompatible and split, decide to sacrifice in order to continue the relation, use vibrators or oth…
/r/MensRights04/08/12 06:43 AM
5

Great article. Now who will get the courts to apply this to men's forced labor to support women and THEIR children/s These men are not convicted felons either. So they can not be forced to work. I suppose there are other laws that allow people to keep the minimum money to support themselves at poverty level. Where is the ACLU /s This SHOULD be an issue for the ACLU, were it not degraded to a feminist institution
/r/MensRights04/08/12 06:36 AM
1

More of the same here. http://www.livescience.com/21951-women-children-first-shipwreck-myth.html
/r/MensRights31/07/12 12:51 AM
0

I know it is totally taboo to ask this. But who goes to Mike Tyson's bedroom, at night, if she has no plans whatsoever for sex. He has enough cash to get a cozy corner in the hotel's restaurant or hall to conduct a conversation. No need to go to his room. I know, this is called "blaming the victim" or, potentially, claiming the false accuser. Mike Tyson also had enough female groupies, enough fans, and enough cash to get himself a top prostitute. Different from Strauss-Kahn, I would not vouch fo…
/r/MensRights29/07/12 03:39 PM
1

Feminists made sure that it is easy to falsely accuse a man of sexual crimes. She went to his hotel room, and later claimed it was rape. Add to that a false theory about vaginal injuries that confuses consensual sex with rape, it is easy to get a man convinced. Just have consensual sex with him and claim it was rape.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 03:33 PM
2

All this confusion is caused by feminist redefinition of rape Because it is very easy to falsely accuse a husband, boyfriend or party fling of rape. Now it it is proven that the guy was a stranger and actually broke into the house, then we are talking alleged forcible rape-rape. Which is the true, ancient, criminal despicable type of non-consensual rape. And most likely she would not falsely accuse a burglar of rape.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 11:40 AM
5

Nobody gets 14 years for suspicion of hiding money from a business partner. Not even for bouncing a million dollar check. It is the pussy pass. Women have special rights that are enforce with special cruelty and lack of due process against men.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 11:28 AM
-2

part of the contract is getting sex. That can always be revoked on 1 second notice, and for as long as she wants.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 11:26 AM
1

that is a good point. Of course, it just politely tells the creep to stay away She still thinks he is a creep
/r/MensRights29/07/12 11:16 AM
5

amen! http://www.avoiceformen.com/misandry/how-to-conceal-regressive-hatred/
/r/MensRights29/07/12 11:15 AM
-3

she should have covered his back when he ran. What a cowardice on her part.
/r/MensRights26/07/12 08:26 PM
0

He should have been her human shield to protect her from the bullets!!? Jamie Rohrs, of Aurora, Colorado, took his girlfriend Patricia Legarreta to a midnight showing of “The Dark Knight Rises,” as you might expect many boyfriends did as a date. In fact, in a mildly kind gesture, he also brought both Legarreta and her two young children. But then the shooting which has rocked the nation happened, and Mr. Rohrs demonstrated that, far from being kind, he actually might be exactly the wrong person …
/r/MensRights26/07/12 08:19 PM
3

Women's tennis: higher pay for weaker play, less work, less spectators, less advertising dollars
/r/MensRights26/07/12 10:10 AM
4

Women can not even compete in Snookeer, darts, cooking, chess Snooker: no woman in the top 30. Do we need quotas for women? Only 1% Michelin starred restaurants have women chefs: discrimination? or women can't cook? One woman among the top 100 chess players. But 40% quotas in management and parliament?
/r/MensRights26/07/12 10:09 AM
2

our divorce is not truly divorce. The man's financial obligations get bigger and more stringent. I always thought a divorce would be the end of the relationship. If someone can not afford paying the kids, let the other person take care of the kids. Only if nobody wants the kids, then government might have to interfere. A divorce should end it all. A divorce ends all obligations for the woman and increases a man's obligations. Married men get away with giving less money, with stopping work, .....…
/r/MensRights26/07/12 03:58 AM
3

A circumcision is no minor operation, with the German Professional Association of Pediatricians calling it a "form of bodily injury." But the child's right contrasts with those of parents, which include religious matters -- and in this case a ritual that goes back thousands of years and, for Jews and Muslims, is a vital component of their faith. Balancing these fundamental rights is complicated. Furthermore, Justice Minister Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger is likewise concerned about the debate shif…
/r/MensRights26/07/12 01:25 AM
2

I thought the law protects the more vulnerable and weak person? (but this is always the women?) Or was he lucky that there was no mandatory arrest of the presumed male perpetrator.
/r/MensRights25/07/12 04:35 PM
1

This still is quite critical of a facet of female sexuality. It is not www.angryharry.com but still jezebel, so we don't agree with every word jezebel says. But if jezebel is at least partially right, that already is a miracle They could have elaborated how all these women choose serial killers because they were victims of the patriarchy and abused by their male family members
/r/MensRights25/07/12 03:24 PM
3

Mr Onoja is understood to have returned from a bar in the small community of Ugbugbu, Ogbadibo, at around 3am on Tuesday, and headed for the bedroom of his youngest wife. His five other wives - who were said to have held a meeting to discuss their intentions before their husband arrived home - are then alleged to have burst into the bedroom armed with knives and sticks to insist that they too be granted their conjugal rights. The businessman, who has been described as a philanthropist who 'contr…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 10:39 AM
-4

Amazing. a great article at jezebel. Serial killer and rapist Richard Ramirez married Doreen Lioy, " freelance magazine editor with a bachelor's degree in English and an I.Q. of 152," in 1996. He has been on death row since the early 1980s and Lioy, an otherwise bright woman, claims that she will commit suicide when Ramirez (who was convicted of murdering 14 people) is executed. Angelo Buono and Kenneth Bianchi—the serial killers known as the Hillside Stranglers—were convicted of kidnapping, rap…
/r/MensRights25/07/12 10:24 AM
2

Even Jezebel is disturbed. http://jezebel.com/5927828/disturbing-james-holmes-twitter-groupies-think-hes-hot-sexy-cute
/r/MensRights25/07/12 10:19 AM
0

women can not say no, can not leave a relationship with a kinky husband. Instead they have to kill the man in self defense Even if she consented to that sex, or if it never happened, the alleged abuser is dead and can not mount any defense
/r/MensRights25/07/12 06:51 AM
3

The Father Factor Data on the Consequences of Father Absence According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 24 million children in America -- one out of three -- live in biological father-absent homes. Consequently, there is a "father factor" in nearly all of the social issues facing America today. Scroll down to view data on the effects of father absence on: poverty, maternal and child health, incarceration, crime, teen pregnancy, child abuse, drug and alcohol abuse, education, and childhood obesity.
/r/MensRights24/07/12 10:07 PM
7

a) could be the crime never happened and the women invented it b) do I understand correctly that they waited 16 months to report this? Until all evidence was gone? c) He could have easily be mis-identified, in case the crime happened but someone else did it d) the women were probably drunk enough to not have much memory nor be good at identifying anyone. Of course, they are not responsible for having been drunk e) in case he actually groped women a bit too rough, how come this is punished more h…
/r/MensRights24/07/12 09:52 PM
2

for one that escapes, how many get incarcerated for a while, and how many get imprisoned for decades? Among those guilty until proven innocent, few can manage to PROVE their innocence beyond reasonable doubt.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 08:17 PM
5

Well, if they don't lower the requirement for women for firefighters, and for marines, there will not be many women in these professions. Are you aware that everywhere, women fulfill lower requirements? Of course, once these women have to march, or run, in combat, then those women will hold up the entire battalion. Or they can not carry the injured in a fire, because their requirement is lower.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 08:14 PM
4

I keep saying. The LAW is the culprit It gives women too much power. Even without any false allegations, to take a man to the cleaners and take away most of his money for years and decades. It takes very good character to renounce the rights the law gives you. I have seen people constantly advising girlfriends of rich guys as to what they should do to make money. Claiming common law marriage, or as the safest bet, become pregnant.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 07:19 PM
2

The problem is the LAW. Any nutcase woman can seriously hurt any man. They have given enormous power. This is why r/mensrights is here. Now having a backup stash is really important because you can, at any time, be evicted out of your own home without money, ID, nothing. Such a backup stash is also good in case your house burns down, or gets flooded, or collapses in an earthquake. Also keep the backup tapes of your computer there. You may even tell your wife, because in case of restraining order…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 07:16 PM
1

Most likely, those couples that have chosen to go to Thailand BECAUSE there they do sex selection. Seems they don't do that anywhere else. This is why the sample is so biased.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:46 PM
18

Have you read this? This woman is great, she belongs to r/mensrights The other popular belief is that nobody needs men and that they're useless. It is soooo untrue and shamelessly childish to say or even think that. If this was true, then who's running the farms and power plants, the steal, coal and gold mines? Who built the houses we're sitting in right now? Who invented all of those things that we take for granted every minute of our lives? What about sewers for a really nice example? Still th…
/r/MensRights17/07/12 06:08 PM
1

As I read on a Jewish reddit: Jews were COMMANDED by God to circumcise their male children on the 8th day. They have no choice. It is their duty Comments? Actually, I see the religious dilemma. If you truly believe in Religion, that is a problem. No, I don't agree with this but I am not truly religious. But to understand politicians, you have to understand the power of religious beliefs.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 01:02 PM
5

exactly. Good advice, and wise girls will heed that advice. But never admit to that in public. And some Pick up artists will capitalize on these girls to get laid.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 12:58 PM
9

note that in the same country, children's right to self determination prohibits men to do DNA test on their putative children. But they can not self-determine about their foreskins. What a double standard!! A painful dangerous useless procedure must be legal. A painless procedure that could save a man from slaving for decades to pay for a cuckold child, that of course violates children's rights. I reposted this topic because this finally was an article in English .....
/r/MensRights15/07/12 12:41 PM
21

note that in the same country, children's right to self determination prohibits men to do DNA test on their putative children. But they can not self-determine about their foreskins. What a double standard!! A painful dangerous useless procedure must be legal. A painless procedure that could save a man from slaving for decades to pay for a cuckold child, that of course violates children's rights.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 12:38 PM
1

Great comment. I will post this now ........... I just posted the German article, with summaries, because I had no English article handy
/r/MensRights15/07/12 12:26 PM
2

Feminist propaganda at r/mensrights At TEDWomen, Tony Porter makes a call to men everywhere: Don't "act like a man." Telling powerful stories from his own life, he shows how this mentality, drummed into so many men and boys, can lead men to disrespect, mistreat and abuse women and each other. His solution: Break free of the "man box." Tony Porter is an educator and activist who is internationally recognized for his effort to end violence against women. Full bio » "If it would destroy [a 12-year-…
/r/MensRights15/07/12 10:47 AM
3

The boy was caught wearing a burka in a lady's hostel's bath room. ("Boy Clad in Burkha Caught in Shivbagh Ladies Hostel!") Invading lady's hostels for sexual trysts would have consequences in other countries too.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 10:44 AM
7

Sucking infant's penis is legal in the US! If you first cut off his foreskin without anesthesia!
/r/MensRights15/07/12 10:24 AM
2

German health minister Behr is under pressure, to remedy this legal insecurity as fast as possible. Possibly by changing patient's rights law. But he has doubts if that can be done, legally. ((transcription of German text above))
/r/MensRights15/07/12 10:21 AM
2

The chief of the German Jewish council presses for a solution before summer recess. If this legal situation prevails, Jewish life in Germany is threatened. "Then we will have to leave". "This is no rhetorical trick" ((transcription of German text above))
/r/MensRights15/07/12 10:21 AM
2

Poor countries that cannot afford the wasteful luxury of feminism. Even latin macho countries got screwed up
/r/MensRights12/07/12 11:07 PM
11

So in nuclear engineering, males probably will not be promoted for many years. Or they will have to promote some gender studies women to fill the gaps.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 12:40 AM
2

A minor can not resist parental pressure, because there is a power differential. So by feminist logic, all consent by a minor is invalid. They can not consent.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 12:10 AM
2

in a country where prostitution is legal And after background checks so you can be sure she is not underage
/r/MensRights12/07/12 12:08 AM
3

Most guys trust the woman. That does not prevent wives, after 30 years of marriage, to f.ck them over at divorce court. The problem is that bad women have total power, in our legal system. You would have to do a major psychological analysis of every women before even toaking to her. Would you also recommend that women should just work on trusting men before going into their hotel room. (and then claiming to have been raped?)
/r/MensRights12/07/12 12:07 AM
2

Great. simpler then having a notary public at your bed side. have her repeat the date too. And say something of her being sober, not coerced, and about withdrawal of consent. Video also might be more powerful then talking. And holding today's newspaper into the video
/r/MensRights12/07/12 12:07 AM
3

it is useless. Women can retract consent at any moment. google for 5 second rape. Consensual sex becomes rape as soon as woman says "I need to go home", says California Supreme Court. And if she gave notarized consent, but later was drunk, then it also is a doubtful issue. If the notarized consent does not have an expiration date, then it is probably too broad to be valid. Get a lawyer before sex: 27 precautions before risking sex with a woman Get a lawyer before courting: 34 precautions before …
/r/MensRights12/07/12 12:02 AM
2

Wrongly calling this killer wife distracts from the seriousness of her crimes. And throwing a huge knife at police, hitting one in the boot, was dismissed. And all this was judged as MISDEMEANOUR? The only positive point is that it counts as female domestic violence, for statistics. It could have been female felony attack on police. A woman who attacked her husband with a knife received a three-year suspended sentence Tuesday in District Court. Judge Russell Fagg imposed the sentence against Amb…
/r/MensRights11/07/12 11:56 PM
8

Funny. Nobody noticed that the article plays down gender bias and is interested in stressing racial bias. Discrimination against men is much worse then it looks in the article. When compared with men, women were 23 percent less likely to be ticketed, 55 percent less likely to be arrested and 76 percent less likely to be searched when stopped by police. Women were more likely to only receive a warning or have no outcome when stopped by police during a traffic stop. When compared with women, men w…
/r/MensRights11/07/12 11:34 PM
2

17 year old an adult? where is that? Are you confusing age of consent with legal majority? Actually, a 17 year old stripper would produce child porn in the surveillance cameras, by the new definition of child (under 18) and porn (anything appealing to prurient interests)
/r/MensRights09/07/12 10:04 AM
9

yes, no throwing away tampons into waste baskets or toilets
/r/MensRights09/07/12 09:59 AM
3

they can look under bathroom stalls where the feet are pointing at. What is worse, urinals are very ecological water savers ...
/r/MensRights09/07/12 09:58 AM
1

One of the BEST THINGS about my husband is he tells me, flat out, when I’m being a bitch/crazy person and won’t tolerate it. He never does this self-deprecating thing, but I do not believe his ‘gaslighting’ is a manipulative tool. If he didn’t do it, I would spend a whole lot more time being angry or crazy, and that would be shit.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 09:56 AM
1

http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/child-porn-witch-hunt/couple-stoned-to-death-video-legal-not-child-porn http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/stoning-afghanistan-graphic-video-execution-shows-talibans-growing/story?id=12770754#.T_ql8_W8itY
/r/MensRights09/07/12 09:39 AM
1

sad to see that I am the only upvote you got. Sex hysteria brainwashing has gone way too far.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 07:08 AM
-1

What does it have to do with men's rights? Actually a women is subject to draconian feminist and religion inspired sex laws. No pussy pass here? Maybe she violated the rule "Never talk to police" by calling police because her underage daughter was hired by a strip club.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 06:47 AM
2

amazing, these downvotes. Too many closet feminists who think women should enjoy the privilege of free food at dates, protection by men, but equal rights when cleaning the home and cooking. This is called raisin picking. Great comment, too bad it is not appreciated enough
/r/MensRights08/07/12 02:57 PM
5

this is not in defense of the Taliban It just mentions that the few women being shot by the Taliban are more important then the thousands of men killed, mutilated, or forcibly recruited by the Taliban. Double standard in reporting. Double standard in giving importance to women.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 02:53 PM
2

I apreciate your reasoned approach. This is a good way to discuss issues. I see much less damage then you do, and I think it is the parent's job to prevent such damage. But you are doing a good analysis which fosters further discussion.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 02:22 PM
1

Well, that next boy can tell her to get lost. If then she keeps insisting, then some punishment might be justified.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 02:20 PM
1

right. All these acts should be decriminalized. If parents think this is wrong behavior, it is their responsibility to eductate and watch their children.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 02:19 PM
1

There is a possibility that any child can be injured severely when playing football There is a possibility that feeding obese children causes premature death Certainly government should mandate 5 year prison sentences for all these crimes. It is the parent's job to keep kids away from behavior they don't approve of. Not the job of big government.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 02:18 PM
1

Thanks for a reasonable voice here. You probably will be downvoted into oblivion, you child abuse apologist /s I thought I was alone. Please stop by at http://human-stupidity.com/irrationality/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality and at http://www.reddit.com/r/Pedosexhysteria/ and comment.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 02:15 PM
7

This is actually in violation of international law, the Hague treaty. It is disgusting that women always get the pussy pass that forgives their misdeeds. A famous case was www.bringseanhome.com Why doesn't the father get interim custody? Or definite custody? According to the Hague treaty, the jurisdiction is at the court of the residence where the children were abducted. And Australia is required to repatriate as fast as possible (under a month time or so .....)
/r/MensRights08/07/12 02:01 PM
23

absolutely shocking. Scarred for life, violently attacked. If she had done that to me, attacked me with a broken bottle, I would have knocked her out. Probably would have been attacked by white knights and arrested by police. If a man had fondled her behind, with prior history of criminal behavior, he would have gotten a harsher sentence Attack with a deadly weapon, knocking someone unconscious, long record of criminal convictions. No jail time. Amazing.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 10:49 AM
2

Great! If a man identifies as women, cab he have the easy test?
/r/MensRights07/07/12 11:00 PM
3

Public safety be damned! Feminist principles are more important.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 10:52 PM
1

What about paying less to these women who have lower standards.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 10:41 PM
2

Amen! Applying the same standards to women is discrimination. Feminists always adapt their logic so it is advantageous to them. Their feelings guide their logic.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 10:36 PM
1

Those woman don't care about good police work. The safety of the population be damned. They care only about their selfish attitude. They want to get a job where they are underqualified.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 10:29 PM
7

Sure, opinions differ. But it need to be clarified what type of harassment. Inviting for dinner, looking, compliments etc. are way over-rated offenses in the work environment. Street harassment for making comments or looking, or even whistling, is a crime created by female oversensitivity. Not being able to make jokes, not being able to have a bikini photo of one's wife at the desk etc is seriously curtailing male freedoms. And it relates to the above issue, yes. Men shrug such things off, women…
/r/MensRights06/07/12 04:25 PM
187

Had men sexually assaulted female police officers, they would have been tasered and arrested by an entire Swat team. Most readers here would probably think that the women should be seriously punished. I believe that men should be treated the way these women were treated, with humor and understanding. Thus all harassment legislation should be uncerimoniously scrapped. Harmless comments, even non-violent grouping should be considered light nuisance and not serious civil or criminal problems. Don't…
/r/MensRights06/07/12 03:33 PM
16

You are lucky. She is an incompetent accuser. There are women that fabricate injuries and other supporting "evidence". But it is interesting. Women feel that safe making accusations, they don't even bother to make them coherent or find supporting evidence. See for example Joerg Kachelmann rape case in Germany
/r/MensRights18/06/12 09:08 AM
8

well, please speak up whenever there is a minority scholarship, women scholarship, Indian, African American scholarship.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 08:52 AM
4

actually, you can not make hiring decisions with your private money in your private company. Or else you get sexism, racism law suits. There are lots of restrictions of use of private money That is a fact. Now not that I favor this .....
/r/MensRights18/06/12 08:49 AM
31

Rape Laws: dismantling of due process explained step by step It beats me why this has not be undone by constitutional challenges in supreme court or even international courts of human rights. Look at VAWA, violence against women act, the name alone is sexist. Add to that that men are frequently victims of female partner violence, and that men suffer more violence (murder etc) then women (though many of the perpetrators are male), all is stacked against men. But men are privileged, and patriarchy…
/r/MensRights18/06/12 08:41 AM
3

of course in most "child porn" as re-defined by feminist politics, "children" (under 18 as re-defined by feminist politics), children don't get damaged either. For example, legal sex with over age of consent 16 year old girlfriend. Nude children photographing themselves in the mirror. Children at legal nude beaches. 15 year olds dancing fully dressed in Leotards (google Knox vs. USA). Human-Stupidity keeps reporting about this topic Dr. Milton Diamond proved that availability of Child Porn reduc…
/r/MensRights16/06/12 06:53 AM
9

Too bad that you get received aggressively. Your question seems to be motivated by genuine interest. And your experience contradicts what is being said here. It has been mentioned that men might not report domestic violence. This is due to shame. Also due to not taking it seriously. Watch the movies how women casually slap men, and nothing happens to the women. See if any recent movie allows men to slap women without getting criticized. I know lots of men that got slapped, punched, or beaten wit…
/r/MensRights15/06/12 01:49 PM
1

I thought the majority of women is more attracted to men then to women. Thus should think men are hotter then women. Maybe I am wrong? I also believe most men think women are hotter then men. Maybe I am wrong too? Now to your point: the average, medium "normal" women, so far, still is heterosexual. Or do you have different statistics, that over 50.01 % of women are bi or Lesbian? Maybe you want to replace the word "true" by "average" or "normal" then?
/r/MensRights14/06/12 10:05 PM
5

Great article. If all feminists were like that one I would proudly call myself a feminist. Please everyone READ the article. You may skip the first few paragraphs, they are unneeded introduction and might bore people before the good stuff comes. How did Sweden's sexual revolution of the 1970s transform into an oppressive 21st century power apparatus where men are portrayed as potential enemies and threats to the state? A state in which those who criticize the prevailing system are denied a voice…
/r/MensRights14/06/12 09:54 PM
1

women want to have their cake and eat it. Stay at home, have a man who rakes in the money, and then when they return to work want to earn more for part time work then the man who worked full time without interruption.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 07:40 AM
-3

We Evolve Hotter Proves she is a Lesbian. Most true women find men hotter then women, be it Justin Bieber, Tom Cruise or whatever heart throb .....
/r/MensRights14/06/12 07:36 AM
3

it is actually the same. Women get free promotion, a free pass to be promoted without merit And Southern European countries get "equality" by Germany underwriting guarantees for their debt. In both cases, unmerited benefits at the cost of the harder working people.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 07:22 AM
2

But this will be binding to about 25 governments of European countries! This is serious!
/r/MensRights14/06/12 07:16 AM
2

I am shocked that none of these articles, be it favorable or against quotas, really shows Warren Farrell's hard evidence that salaries are already equal or already biased against men. No hard data, no listing of Farrells 25 reasons why women earn less Neither politicians, nor the press, ever mention data, by Farrell or even the US government, that shows that the wage gap is a myth and that affirmative action simply promotes women in front of more capable and deserving men. It is shocking that th…
/r/MensRights14/06/12 07:15 AM
3

I am shocked that none of these articles, be it favorable or against quotas, really shows Warren Farrell's hard evidence that salaries are already equal or already biased against men. No hard data, no listing of Farrells 25 reasons why women earn less Neither politicians, nor the press, ever mention data, by Farrell or even the US government, that shows that the wage gap is a myth and that affirmative action simply promotes women in front of more capable and deserving men. It is shocking that th…
/r/MensRights14/06/12 07:15 AM
2

Whether Pat is male or female, if Pat works 10% less daily, or takes 10% more of the year off for (medical reasons, pregnancy, paternity, or quality time with the Nintendo) Pat is worth 10% less in wages. wrong, those who work 10% more get higher per hour wages, for being more dedicated, reliable, motivated efficient available workers. Working 10% more translates in, say, 20% more salary. And not out of patriarchy's spite to harm women.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 07:09 AM
1

Right: men chosing more time with family, men chosing more time off, men choosing time consuming hobbies, men screwing up their health taking drugs, over-eating ........ reduce their take home pay
/r/MensRights14/06/12 07:06 AM
6

But Sexual Harassment law was never designed to protect women from merely feeling uncomfortable. In a typical workday, men and women alike face many sources of discomfort: atheists face clerks wearing crosses; able-bodied people face colleagues in wheelchairs; Fundamentalist Muslims and Jews face professors dressed with arms and legs uncovered; the infertile face coworkers’ desks with photos of their kids, and parents are given time off for parenting events such as piano recitals.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 10:37 AM
2

great! not sure if she can afford to get things notarized twice a week. Check legally valid web sites. I joined readnotify.com. I believe emails sent through them are legally proven to have been sent and received.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 07:56 AM
3

keep SEVERAL backup copies of all evidence in the house of trusted friends. involve grandparents, if possible and useful. Father's parents certainly are cooperative, but maybe even mother's parents.
/r/MensRights13/06/12 07:53 AM
3

This is a very complex issue. You might commit a felony if you do recordings, especially if you are not even one party in the conversation. Study the recording laws in your state. Keeping exact records gives you lot more credibility. Have your records safely copied. There are sites that can store documents with timestamps. try readnotify.com to certify emails you can mail to your friends. You might bring in friends, or call them during altercations so they 'accidentally' witness the arguments th…
/r/MensRights13/06/12 07:51 AM
6

This is probably totally under-reported. Most guys who "voluntarily" yield because they feel it is safer to do so, don't consider themselves raped By feminist definition (consent in jail is impossible due to power differential), any man who engages in any sex in jail is getting raped. At least if he is on the receiving end. Prisoners have not yet been enlightened by feminist indoctrination as to what constitutes rape. Also consider that most rapes in prison are sex slavery lasting for years on e…
/r/MensRights13/06/12 07:33 AM
9

not everyone is out to get you. But mom was shocked, so you probably had about a 1 in 10 chance of getting yourself in trouble. It is enough if one in one thousand gets you into a legal quagmire, days or week in jail, tens of thousands in legal cost, etc. Huge risk for basically zero gain. Rather huge risk for you giving away your time and effort. Not worth it. Funny, nobody here focuses on the bad laws (Vawa), police and prosecutor conduct and feminist falsification of research and statistics, …
/r/MensRights13/06/12 07:21 AM
8

If you don't believe the daily mail, maybe the guardian will do: http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2012/may/31/butler-sloss-women-ethnic-minority-judges Lady Butler-Sloss began well. She gave "strong support" for greater diversity among those appointed to the judiciary – so long as, of course, that such appointments are made "on merit". Few would disagree with that. However, in attempting to underline this point, things went downhill. Butler-Sloss continued: "It will be very important that women – p…
/r/MensRights03/06/12 06:59 PM
-6

fantastic argument!! And because Blacks commit more violent crimes, they should be racially profiled, and also get harsher penalties. /s
/r/MensRights03/06/12 06:51 PM
31

This complete video is somewhere on youtube. The cop was attacked by two unruly girls who would not submit. Alone, surrounded by a somewhat hostile crowd. That was necessary violence to arrest her and to instill respect. Or else he would have had to let them go, or worse, let the situation escalate against him.
/r/MensRights29/05/12 09:21 AM
-4

"The computer came up with a number of $3,000 a month that I should pay Shawn, but the judge did lower that down to $1,000 a month," Crystal Harris said. "That is what I call the rape discount, because he thought he was doing me this big favor." still a pussy pass. Crystal Harris, 39, and her now ex-husband Shawn Harris, 40, had been college sweethearts. They married in 1996. She said there were scattered domestic violence incidents over the years and then in 2008, Shawn sexually attacked her wh…
/r/MensRights28/05/12 08:58 PM
2

What percentage of taxi drivers, of people in general record all their trips? 1%? That means that 99 men languish in jail or prison, for every man that gets free due to recordings. Add to that that most men who have recordings warn the girls before they call police and most men whose charges get dismissed immediately don't make it into the news: at least 999 men languish in prison for every known and published case like this one.
/r/MensRights28/05/12 07:11 PM
8

no action taken against the woman either? If they take no action against the man he must be pretty convincing. I also wonder how she photographed him sleeping AFTER having been groped and assaulted. or she took the photo before she went to sleep, before she knew he would assault her? Very strange story
/r/MensRights24/05/12 09:52 AM
-4

ok. Biological men, legal women. Can't change the laws of biology and the chromosomes. Can mediocre male tennis players get an operation to win the women's world championship? What about female athletes that turn out male and lose their titles? After all, the feel like they are women, are women in their passports?
/r/MensRights19/05/12 12:11 PM
2

Among the survey's findings: — Just about the same number of former inmates were victimized by facility staff as were victimized by other inmates. About 27,300 — 5.4 percent — reported incidents with other inmates, while 23,300 — 5.3 percent — reported incidents that involved facility staff. Of the former inmates who reported incidents with staff, 6,300 — or 1.2 percent — of the former inmates said they had unwilling sex or sexual contact with staff, while the rest said they "willingly" had sexu…
/r/MensRights19/05/12 10:52 AM
1

Yes, a violent murderer, gang member accompanied by his gang friends is not likely to be raped by a middle age father behind with his child support payments. The real criminals are rewarded with sex objects and the petty criminals are ass raped.
/r/MensRights19/05/12 10:48 AM
-7

Aren't feminists AGAINST beauty pageants? And now they favor the rights of MEN to participate in WOMEN's pageants? Anyone ready to explain the logic? Will women ever compete against Schwarzenegger wannabes in Mr. Universe contests?
/r/MensRights19/05/12 10:44 AM
7

Yes, especially if they think that Lorena Bobbitt acted in self defense and was a hero. If they think dismembering males is legitimate self defense. I never sleep in the same room with a woman that is even slightly angry at me. I sleep in another room with the door locked safely.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 07:23 PM
2

If you want to bet married these day, you really need a psychological evaluation. If you are sane you would not get married. Too bad the law went that far ...
/r/MensRights17/05/12 07:21 PM
2

275,000 legal fees! For her lawyer! WTF?
/r/MensRights17/05/12 12:21 PM
1

I would check if you can get a psychological expert witness to testify to such facts. Study the legal ramifications of such an expert witness
/r/MensRights09/05/12 04:41 PM
2

you know what will happen. If the boys out-perform girls in any way, then women will cry "discrimination" and demand that girls be admitted. Or if any girl feels discriminated. After all, we are past the age of all male country clubs /s
/r/MensRights09/05/12 04:36 PM
0

Could be your jealousy wrecked the marriage. Could be your jealousy was justified. Could be she just had contact with her ex with no sexual connotations. I personally am in favor of open marriage. Things might have worked out had you ignored her tryst. Or if you had pretended you did not figure it out. Guess I will be downvoted. I understand that most people here think that unfaithful wives are unacceptable. I am just giving you some food for thought. An alternative feedback. An unconventional w…
/r/MensRights08/05/12 07:45 AM
15

Male chivalry is a bitch. He lets her get away with lies and crimes. Even after he is threatened with jail. It is also shocking how a women, living with a rich man, still squeezes money out of a poor father. Through all of the perjury she committed (you can bet your life I can prove it), I never decided to have it brought up. In NY, perjury in a written instrument is a class 'E' felony. That means possible jail time. I could not bring myself to put up a fight against the sometimes insane accusat…
/r/MensRights08/05/12 07:38 AM
1

Aren't we, at r/mr, constantly reading the message children get: "boys, don't hit girls". Educate boys not to be violent. Punish boys for violence. The message might be successful. Boys are getting less violent. And women get violent role models in the movies. And finally, less violent, less chivalrous boys don't keep female fights under control and in check. Quite possible. School counsellors say girls have become more violent in the past 15 years and boys have become less violent, apparently r…
/r/MensRights08/05/12 07:25 AM
1

That is because women are prevented from playing football. The sport would become more humane if it had a feminine touch /s
/r/MensRights08/05/12 07:14 AM
9

Did you read Angry Harry? How the British health service is lacking physicians because too many women clog up University spaces and then drop out of professional work? How investing into men's education would be the better investment, because men actually will have a full time life long career. So our statement might be wrong. Or rather, working men raise the land out of poverty, and then there is money available for women's education and feminism. Thus there might even be a correlation but no c…
/r/MensRights08/05/12 07:12 AM
3

There's a high correlation between women's education and raising countries out of poverty. any proof for this? I mean are there countries where men's education increases and the country is not raised out of poverty? could be another feminist lie!
/r/MensRights08/05/12 07:05 AM
3

if you explain that this is feminist theory, and the law, and this is NOT your opinion, then you will not be downvoted any more.
/r/MensRights08/05/12 01:04 AM
5

Great intentions. But criminalizing fathers and finding another way to gauge money from fathers. Probably not a coincidence that this case is a female daughter winning against the male father. Even if the guy were negligent due to his own volition, due to his own coldness or character, it should not be government's business to financially punish men so they take care of their daugthers. "Daddy, if you don't pay me a new car, I will sue you for neglect". BRASILIA – The Committee on Constitution, …
/r/MensRights06/05/12 11:36 PM
1

These two men don't have the same politics. And of course, Strauss Kahn could have lost the election. And the IMF certainly changed leadership and policy regarding Euro Bailouts.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 10:27 PM
-2

Were it not for Nafissatou Diallo, and feminist rape and harassment legislation, Strauss Kahn would have remained his party’s favorite and is likely to have been in the race and might have become French president. Dominique Strauss-Kahn’s arrest paved the way for a goal that had long eluded the political career of 57-year-old French Socialist François Hollande: to square off against President Nicolas Sarkozy in next month’s election. The international monetary fund got a different chief with dif…
/r/MensRights06/05/12 10:25 PM
3

If the woman were instrumental in him making the money, she would know about it in the first place. Of course, the law is wrong, not the lawyer who gets the most money for his female client. Of course, one might call it immoral.
/r/MensRights06/05/12 10:08 PM
2

great article. No news here, but considering that even Obama hasn't understood the issue yet, it is a very valuable article
/r/MensRights01/05/12 08:22 PM
5

Young men raging with high testosterone levels make the bravest and most heroic fighters. The same hormones cause these soldiers to have high sex drives. These war heroes, ready to die for their country, are taken overseas and kept away from women, confined among men, for months on end. Pent-up sexuality due to suchanti prostitution policy may cause higher rates of harassment, date rape, forcible rape. Young immature soldiers may embark on premature marriages, whose consequences and failures wil…
/r/MensRights01/05/12 12:39 PM
2

Add to all this that they took away most legal sexual outlets 18 USC § 1384 prohibits US military to solicit legalized prostitutes abroad (1 year imprisonment) Young men raging with high testosterone levels make the bravest and most heroic fighters. The same hormones cause these soldiers to have high sex drives. These war heroes, ready to die for their country, are taken overseas and kept away from women, confined among men, for months on end. Pent-up sexuality due to suchanti prostitution polic…
/r/MensRights01/05/12 10:05 AM
3

They don't explain how she sexually assaulted her. But a man would not get a suspended sentence even if he only grabbed her ass. A WOMAN sexually assaulted another woman in the toilets of a Salisbury nightclub, a court heard. Winchester Crown Court was told on Friday that Tamanda Kapezi, 33, of Churchill Avenue, Bulford, was out with friends at the Chapel Nightclub, Milford Street, on February 5 last year. She barged her way into a toilet cubicle behind the 23-year-old victim, locking the door b…
/r/MensRights30/04/12 10:57 PM
5

right. Academics has been perverted. compare: How feminists corrupt Domestic Violence research & warp world politics and legislation Now it is not only women, men collaborate. Also, lots of the mechanisms are known and have been described here.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 10:50 PM
13

If you stalk or harass or threaten a woman, you can be sure criminal charges will be filed. For a woman it is enough if she FEELS threatened. Also there is damage, even if it comes off you need to pay for cleaning.
/r/MensRights30/04/12 08:57 PM
4

she did not turn him down before, and it never was alleged that he followed her into the elavator. Probably was there accidentally. Finally he did not express sexual interest but invited her to tea or something similar. Very shocking behavior /s Very obvious that a woman will be scarred for life by such a traumatic experience /s
/r/MensRights26/04/12 09:19 PM
1

Not a men's rights issue? Legal right to renounce child support empowers women, increases birth rates The fact that the agreement is not legally binding actually harms men financially, and restricts women's freedom to get a child from the man of her choice (legally, and without child support)
/r/MensRights21/04/12 12:34 PM
2

The court fixed the doctors’ obligatory support payment at the legal minimum, to be paid until the children turn 18. The judge dismissed any further claims. The doctors may appeal the verdict at the Federal Court of Justice. How nice of them towards the doctors. But they should mind the best interest of the child and award half the income of the father, or the doctor, whichever is bigger. So a high standard of living is guaranteed for the child and the mother /sarcasm It is amazing why nobody ev…
/r/MensRights21/04/12 11:42 AM
4

Where were the MALE law makers? Men don't speak up to protect men. Except here at r/mr. Male law makers are so disinterested, they don't speak up for males. We now need feminists and female law makers to defend men's interests?
/r/MensRights20/04/12 08:23 AM
13

thanks for your wise reply. I thought you would get more down votes. But yes, there should be less political correctness controlling every faced of our life stifling creativity, arts, etc.
/r/MensRights20/04/12 08:20 AM
1

have SEVERAL friends walk with you as witnesses. Have them write down data of other witnesses. Try to go for richer girls so you can see if you can get money out of them. You need to find a lawyer who would do that for free. Either for idealistic reasons, or because there is money to be gotten. Certainly fame.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 04:17 PM
1

would Jezebel or 2x give such advice? They would say: go girl, get him arrested. This is sexual assault. To the questioner: get recordings. Buy some eye-glasses with built in camera for proof.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 08:36 AM
1

Do you think a women reporting a man slapping her ass on the street would be ignored as a waste of taxpayers money? Especially if she had a recording?
/r/MensRights17/04/12 08:34 AM
2

I can tell you the logic of this. This judge is used to handing out debtor's prison (contempt of court) citations to men, related to child support issue. So he is doing this just out of habit. He would never do this for failing to pay a parking ticket
/r/MensRights17/04/12 08:31 AM
6

exactly. And especially $ 36 debt. Any late payment to the Department of Motor vehicle costs more then that. Arrest them all Why doesn't some men's rights lawyer do a lawsuit for unconstitutionality on that one? or put it in all the newspapers world wide. How many women are among the arrest warrants? Certainly they are under-represented. Would not surprise me if there were ZERO women among them. Can you imagine women getting arrested for not paying some women-only specific fee? There would be mi…
/r/MensRights17/04/12 08:16 AM
0

The problem is that this mentality is transcribed into our LAWS, as far as women are concerned. Alimony, battered women syndrome, harassment, date rape, ..... So it seems not only built into women, but even into man when referring to women ..........
/r/MensRights17/04/12 08:09 AM
61

Women can withdraw their authorization to have sex at any time in the middle of the act. If the man does not stop, then it is rape. Even if it takes him 5 seconds (google 5 second rape). Now a man can not withdraw his promise to pay a meal? Where is the written contract he will pay the meal? He probably should have paid his meal. Now it is normal practice for someone bail out early and the remaining party pay the meal. Will we get the false accusations of promise to pay a meal? Note that no proo…
/r/MensRights16/04/12 08:27 PM
1

This is probably not the place to talk politics It seems that the Euro has caused these problems. Germany is right not to increase the guarantees for other countries without limit. Germany will be taken down by the other countries who are going bankrupt. The austerity seems to be wrong too. Voluntary decreases in salary and rents etc. will never be enforced. So it leaves a devaluation of the national currency as the simple market solution. If it could be done, if there were not ONE currency, the…
/r/MensRights15/04/12 11:01 PM
1

In Greece, the suicide rate among men increased more than 24 percent from 2007 to 2009, government statistics show. In Ireland during the same period, suicides among men rose more than 16 percent. In Italy, suicides motivated by economic difficulties have increased 52 percent, to 187 in 2010 — the most recent year for which statistics were available — from 123 in 2005. Researchers say the trend has intensified this year as government austerity measures took hold and compounded the hardships for …
/r/MensRights15/04/12 09:22 PM
16

Here several articles about false accusation prevalence. In the articles you find further links, especially the very relevant Kanin study. Note that this is OFFICIAL government research, like the data of an entire year in the state of Bavaria. Yes, some feminists alleged that the very conservative, very rich and very Christian state of Bavaria/Germany suffers from especially high numbers of false accusations. One major problem is as follows: There is the obvious false accusations, where the perp…
/r/MensRights15/04/12 08:44 PM
1

If she names someone as father, knowing it MIGHT be someone else, she is committing fraud.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 07:38 PM
7

Dio why should women get the job if they cannot perform adequately? And still get the same pay?
/r/MensRights14/04/12 07:18 PM
4

Misdemeanor domestic battery! $10,000 bail. A man gets into more trouble for uncoordinated uncorroborated allegations that he shoved a, woman
/r/MensRights06/04/12 04:17 PM
3

and then the man would not, in his despair, reosrt to punching the woman in self defense against financial abuse
/r/MensRights06/04/12 02:13 AM
6

all this is an argument in favor of financial abortion. If the man was not forced to pay up, it would not even be that hard to allow the woman to get the baby she wants. Alternatively Legal right to renounce child support empowers women, increases birth rates: If they want a baby, allow the empowered independent hard working woman to financially take care of it herself. Still should give father visitation rights, though. I usually get downvoted when I say such things.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 02:08 AM
54

there was a third wrong: The women wanting to force the man to have unprotected sex, or else she would call police. In feminist speak this is attempted rape by blackmail. The article, of course, suffers from the unconditional "don't hit girls, even if they hit you first" dogma. Most writers here doubted that there was not an easier way to stop the girl, without physical violence. What reaction should r/mr have according to jezebel and the above article? Should we get his IP and turn him in to po…
/r/MensRights06/04/12 02:02 AM
3

there are not too many false reports of street robbery, of bank robbery, of house break ins etc. Reason: the above crimes need to be proven beyond reasonable doubt, and the accuser needs to stand cross examination. Rape accusers have special rights. Due process of law, which men fought for centuries to achieve, has been subverted and removed. Which woman would want to take revenge by accusing her husband of stealing money out of her purse? or robbing someone on the street? It would not work! Rap…
/r/MensRights04/04/12 08:25 PM
0

very probable: police are anti-women, pro rape. So they let all these rapists off the hook. If in doubt, let them go. /s And Bavaria, one of the richest, most developed, most conservative Christian state of Germany, is especially full of false accusers. /s And where is Kanin's sample from?
/r/MensRights04/04/12 08:20 PM
-1

In the report of your first link they speak of 7,4%, I did not check further. Why not? 6% - 12 % are blatantly false. 40-60% sound dubious, but can not be clearly disproven. Where is the overstatement? The sad thing is: due to feminist laws and jurisprudence, when the accusation seems fishy but can not be proven false, then only the man is getting prosecuted. No inquiry against the women is initiated, for potential false accusations.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 08:18 PM
1

Possible, but very unlikely. Kanin did US samples, I believe. The other sample is form Austria.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 08:17 PM
-1

These numbers are found consistently. around 6% to 12 % are clearly false so they recommend prosecuting the woman and not the man. Of course, a lot of these women still get off unpunished. Way over 50% of rape accusations are false. 7.4% blatantly enough to prosecute (Bavarian Police research report) 4 out of 5 sexual abuse accusations are false (Austrian head of vice police) One in two rape accusations are false! Strauss-Kahn, presumed guilty, jailed, slandered without due process, escaped. Oth…
/r/MensRights04/04/12 04:40 PM
4

why did she not do it right in the locked bath room. Sperm does not get better with age. This is strange and then she announced it. Strange too
/r/MensRights04/04/12 04:33 PM
-4

except in case of crimes against women. Alleged rape, alleged domestic violence.
/r/MensRights04/04/12 04:32 PM
3

This certainly is a good idea. You have to see how to make this be a PROOF. You would need to have witnesses, or the bill by app store or whatever it is called. BUT: There are plenty of women (and men) that are good people but insanely jealous or curious. This is just a human weakness. You might consider forgiving her that weakness. It is like pilfering your wallet or opening your mail. Annoying but if that is her only fault, live with it. You are lucky she is not sophisticated. I recently found…
/r/MensRights04/04/12 04:23 PM
4

could be based on his income PRIOR to going to jail!!
/r/MensRights03/04/12 06:07 PM
14

well she was how old? 14? maybe she should not be prosecuted when she was that young. But the testimony of a crazy wacko child alone should never have been enough to imprison a man. Without any corroborating evidence. Pray for the thousands of men where the "victim" did not recant and that still rot in jail. In all these cases, their jail mates don't believe he is innocent of child rape and thus probably punished him their way: Raping the child rapist Sad and disgusting.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 06:04 PM
5

Could be mutual rape. Her raping a boy of similar age. Why do we need such confusing re-definition of words? Now we have forcible rape and consensual rape. Well, ok, she can not consent. there is the re-definition of the word consent. Enthusiastic yes is not consent. how confusing. Yes means No! Forcibly raping a 17 year old is the same rape as consensual love making Maybe she made a conscious decision to seek to get raped. (any sex she has is rape, as you just noted) Sorry if I get overboard, I…
/r/MensRights03/04/12 05:47 PM
17

If men's rights gets as strong as women's right then they can try to get away with such one-sided statements. so far it is egalitarian men's rights against women-are-always-right-and-important feminism. Guess who won
/r/MensRights03/04/12 05:30 PM
25

exactly. This is the disgusting way how feminism and the religious right (?) have subverted our legal system and removed all vestiges of due process. mainly in rape cases. Also in some child abuse cases. Absolutely anyone can be accused. If he finds an alibi, just change the date of the incident, and move ahead with the cse.
/r/MensRights03/04/12 05:30 PM
6

They never will. Men are always privileged. Check your privilege!! /s
/r/MensRights03/04/12 05:24 PM
3

. Homeless women are rarely seen because they often find shelter with relatives, friends, or other homeless women. They are talking about homeless women that are NOT homeless. They have a home. They have a shelter. Typical female train of thought. They have a feeling that there are lots of homeless women, and that they grew from 0.1 % to 0.2% and thus are fast growing. They don't even try to make up numbers like I do, they just don't cite any. So they have a feeling this requires a wikipedia art…
/r/MensRights02/04/12 05:53 PM
2

As the central government has proposed an amendment of giving up to 50% share to wife in her husband’s property, men whose marriage is caught in a rough weather and on the verge of a divorce, will have to think twice before buying any immovable property. Speaking to media persons here on Thursday, president of MRA Atit Rajpara said,“If a man has dependent parents and owns a single property and if 50% of that goes to wife post divorce, how will the husband take care of his old parents?.’’ The MRA…
/r/MensRights31/03/12 12:46 PM
2

it is worse in Brazil. There they get 100% of the first house incentivated by government program. If she did not get it in the first place, when the title was given to the family, ahem wife. In divorce, women will inherit government subsidized real estate property, decrees Brazilian president Dilma Rousseff (a woman) Feminism is taking over the world, everywhere. And nobody stops them.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 12:44 PM
2

recently I read an interesting comment by an Indian. That there the women abusing powerful men in India. I think in rural poorer India. And in compensation, that the law beats down the regular Indian men with total abandon. There is a famous female government minister who really socks it to men.
/r/MensRights31/03/12 12:41 PM
7

amazing: The other shocker in all 181 comments I received? Not one of them chastised my husband for piercing Amalía's ears, even though it was his desire that led us to do so. Instead, all these self-proclaimed feminists did what people have from time immemorial: blamed the mama. And I'm just as guilty as all the rest of them -- I didn't even notice the fact that not one reader singled out my husband until he pointed it out himself. Any comments?
/r/MensRights31/03/12 10:39 AM
9

Sucking infant's penis is legal in the US! If you first cut off his foreskin without anesthesia
/r/MensRights31/03/12 10:27 AM
1

If a study were done that was large enough to produce conclusive evidence there would be no way to control for unreported rapes of the members of the control group. Even the most avid feminist would not claim that one in 4 women would get raped in a short time span, and then be too shy to even confide that fact to a University researcher. So you would not expect any unreported rapes in the control group. Now in the rape group: Estimates of false reports are between 8 and 60%. Add to that all the…
/r/MensRights31/03/12 04:24 AM
5

right. It needs to be clarified why the boy did not see the punch, and if the underwear was not removed by force. Then there is the re-definition of rape. Probably it was called rape just by the girl's age. If he stopped when she said no, and if he did not see the punch, then by the old classic rape definition he did not rape. It seems quite clear that the main culprit was the instigating girl. It is typical of the pussy pass culture that female ring leader and true culprit gets the same penalty…
/r/MensRights31/03/12 02:12 AM
1

Nobody is quite aware that prison rape is not comparable to normal forcible rape, but to rape of a victim imprisoned in a dungeon, for years at the mercy of the rapist, like the world famous Fritzl case in Austria. However, Rideau and Wikberg (1992, p. 77) contend that few female rape victims in society must repay their rapist for the violence inflicted upon them. However, male rape victims must unwillingly devote their existence to servicing their rapists for years after the violation in the pr…
/r/MensRights31/03/12 01:25 AM
1

Why all these downvotes? knee jerk reaction to anything "racist", even when proven academically? Or anyone here can disprove the argument, painstakingly laid out with academic citations? Here is the link to the original research. http://www.justdetention.org//pdf/knowles2.pdf It is a known fact that white men get raped by other races in prison: a) white men are under-represented. Blacks and Hispanics form the biggest populations in prison. b) white men are not a cohesive group. They don't fight …
/r/MensRights31/03/12 01:20 AM
6

sorry to contradict you. There is no problem with the nursing student sample who were NOT raped. And 34 % of them showed vaginal tears that would be considered proof of rape. So it does not matter if 100%, 36% or 10% of rape victims suffer from vaginal tears and abrasions. It simply shows that vaginal tears are NOT a proof of rape
/r/MensRights31/03/12 12:21 AM
2

Conventional wisdom: Vaginal injuries ==> proof that rape has happened ==> Man goes to jail This happened to Mike Tyson! Not the study, but vaginal injuries are totally inconclusive The results showed that vaginal injuries were found in 36 percent of rape victims at the Centre for Rape Victims at Odense University Hospital, and in 34 percent of the nursing students. Do you understand the law about proof beyond reasonable doubt? Did you read the article? If 1% of women with regular sex, but 36% o…
/r/MensRights31/03/12 12:08 AM
1

links? This seems quite different. Sex is natural, while shaking babies is not. If a baby gets neck injuries, that should not happen naturally. At least neglect should be involved, forgetting to hold the head correctly. Unless you show links ......
/r/MensRights30/03/12 11:10 PM
3

add a /s to denote sarcasm
/r/MensRights30/03/12 11:09 PM
3

I think it was Norway, or Stockholm. Careful, we will be downvoted for racism. http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/world/2011/August/Culture-Crisis-Norway-Tackles-Muslim-Immigration-/ http://www.bnp.org.uk/news/all-rapes-oslo-committed-immigrants http://www.bnp.org.uk/news/all-rapes-oslo-committed-immigrants http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2011/05/norway-all-rapes-in-past-5-years-committed-by-muslimsnon-western-immigrants.html
/r/MensRights30/03/12 11:08 PM
3

Except if the woman demands inflexible work hours, child birth vacation, clocks in more sick leaves, and is prone to sue companies for discrimination and harassment. And has less ambition, always calls for a man when work gets rough and dangerous And has less work experience because she took a 3 year leave. If she costs more and produces less, she should not ve paid the same.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 10:25 AM
-1

, Please post correct link to article!
/r/MensRights29/03/12 10:13 AM
2

and it looks very much as if women were fulfilling the same demands of training as men, in the military. I doubt that they would lift the same size log as the men.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 06:44 AM
1

Great. now for equality's sake, let us amend VAWA to demand that women build an airtight case before ever calling police. Also nobody would ever send a woman victim to spend a night at a motel. Furthermore, why did you BLUFF you were recording, if you were so well prepared? Why did you not record?
/r/MensRights29/03/12 06:41 AM
1

the problem is that the story rings true. It could perfectly have happened. It happens all the time. It is normal for a male victim of DV to be arrested. It is normal for a women to get away with destroying, selling, and stealing a boyfriend's property. Plenty of such cases were documented. And we know the laws. Violence against WOMEN act, Duluth model, .... How feminists corrupt Domestic Violence research & warp world politics and legislation
/r/MensRights29/03/12 06:38 AM
1

a good start. But breaking stuff and stealing should be a CRIMINAL charges, filed by a District Attorney at no charge to the victim.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 06:35 AM
1

does this ever happen when a woman calls the cop for being abused? arresting both? feminists would go ballistic, Clinton and Obama would interfere personally.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 06:33 AM
2

that is equivalent to telling a woman that she knew the guy was a violent jerk and potential rapist. So she had it coming and deserves to be raped and beaten.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 06:31 AM
7

Interesting discussion in the blog afterwards: Because women actually work hard in the household, and don't take Fridays off for loafing, they feel justified in demanding to be boss but unavaliable and unreachable on Fridays. They think a bosses' leading position can be split into two half time working positions. When, in reality, a real boss needs to be ONE head who works 1 1/2 working shifts.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 06:19 AM
6

Seems this guy at least read Warren Farrell Now part time bosses, maybe with 2 year paid baby vacation for boss to leave the company without a leader. Maybe that is not a wise management decision. It is not discrimination, it is just proper business administration.
/r/MensRights29/03/12 06:10 AM
3

Distributing aid specifically to WOMEN creates resentment. The United Nations, western women’s organizations and the Haitian government must immediately provide women in Haiti with the funding that they need to build domestic violence and rape crisis centers. Stop dividing Black families by distributing solely to women, which only exaggerates male resentment and frustration in Haiti. Provide both women and men with job training programs that would allow for self-sufficiency as opposed to continu…
/r/MensRights29/03/12 06:00 AM
14

On Wednesday, members of the House Judiciary Civil committee voted to exempt women in domestic violence shelters from having to take drug tests to get welfare payments. Critics of the testing plan had argued that abused women sometimes cope by abusing drugs and may be hesitant to leave a violent partner if they do not have financial support. The argument seems a little plausible BUT a) it does not explain why men would not eqaully be afraid to leave violent relationships, and why men would not t…
/r/MensRights26/03/12 03:49 AM
1

People don't quite understand the seriousness of becoming the tough guy's "wife" for weeks and months, under the credible threat of getting killed. No way how one can escape, after all one has to sleep. And then, for further humiliation the victim has to wash the rapist's clothes in between the rapes. And reminists think a tipsy women who later on repents her enthusiastic consent suffers from worse rape then the above sex slave. In reality, this is as bad as world famous case of Mr. Fritzl in Au…
/r/MensRights26/03/12 03:40 AM
4

The exception is pretty restricted: in the case in question, the true father found out about his paternity through a DNA test after the other man had already had the role of a father for a long time. In general it is about biological father vs. the putative father who played the father's role for a long time. Now, it would not surprise me if they would charge the true father child support anyway. But that is just my fear, not from the article. the decision was just to allow Germany the freedom t…
/r/MensRights22/03/12 08:05 PM
1

Fantastic! And this is main stream?!
/r/MensRights22/03/12 06:20 PM
1

Link please
/r/MensRights22/03/12 03:34 PM
11

You forgot retirement. Women work less years, retire earlier, die later, Totally subsidized by men!
/r/MensRights21/03/12 01:04 PM
7

They never taught that in school. In the not so recent past you could have cat-called them, invited them for a date, and they were hearty and empowered enough to tell men to get lost. That simple and natural. Like it has been for 200 000 years. Until feminists claiming weakness and victimhood. Now for a clear normal family man to being able to offer help, that is totally absurd beyond repair. Note also that he probably was supposed to check ID first, he could have thought they were 18 and then i…
/r/MensRights20/03/12 12:48 PM
8

THAT is the strange thing. He must have been threatened serious jail to agree to a plea bargain. This is the true scandal. Where do we have a lawyer that can get the COURT papers? I know a district attorney that loves to hear about crazy cases, provided they are with original documentations.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 12:46 PM
4

THAT is the strange thing. He must have been threatened serious jail to agree to a plea bargain. This is the true scandal. Where do we have a lawyer that can get the COURT papers? I know a district attorney that loves to hear about crazy cases, provided they are with original documentations.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 12:45 PM
1

Not sure if it helps to convert in the midst of divorce proceedings. Also not sure if it works if only one partner is Muslim.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 09:15 AM
3

Please upvote and donate. I just did. Who has contacts with legal organisations that would take his case, as a free speech issue? Even the ACLU should be interested. Who can repost to relevant reddits? libertarian, free speech, human rights, politics, .... WHO IS DOWNVOTING THIS? Please speak up and justify!
/r/MensRights19/03/12 01:18 PM
-1

Seems an admin changed the title of this post. Probably due to sensitivities of being watched by the FBI and anti-hate groups who look for reasons to smear this r/mensrights Well better then censoring away the entire topic and blocking it. I suppose it is ok to write the title in a less exposed place where it can be discussed. Here is the original title. Former "child porn" victims speak up campaign. As children they LOVED the non-nude solo modeling, that was maligned as child pornography: "Phot…
/r/MensRights19/03/12 01:00 PM
-1

And don't forget: children were victimized due to the hysteria. One left school and resorted to home schooling. The other model, daughter of the photographer, had her house torn apart and father taken away. All lost their joy of modeling and well paid work. All suffered from discrimination and shock at school.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 12:57 PM
-2

Relevant to MR because contradicts feminist victim theory. The victims themselves CAMPAIGN in public to declare they were not victims of the "child pornographers" innocent men were imprisoned for over 5 years each for doing what was considered legal, maybe a little creepy. the photographer plea-bargained partially to get a written promise that his wife would not be prosecuted civil rights groups were concerned, because Vogue and Seventeen and Department store lingerie catalogues publish similar …
/r/MensRights19/03/12 12:54 PM
3

To be fair, it is 7 out of 9 men tested. Aren't there more doubtful paternity cases per year in Zimbabwe? Last year, about 11 cases were referred for DNA paternity tests in South Africa and nine results were announced in court while two others are yet to be announced for reasons ranging from lack of follow-up by the parties or failure to pay off costs. Of the nine cases, six men discovered that they had spent money on other men's children while only three had their paternity confirmed.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 12:37 PM
1

Progressive Africa. We can learn from them When the man wins his case, he will then apply for discharge from paying maintenance and subsequently claim all the money he had paid from the woman. In the event that the woman fails to pay back, a court order may be obtained to attach property or to commit her to prison. Well, not quite: The onus is on the man to prove he is not the father through DNA paternity tests. If the man contests paternity, he is given up to six months to undergo the testing. …
/r/MensRights19/03/12 12:36 PM
7

also because muslims would riot, or even secede if necessary. Not the sheep going to slaughter quietly like the other men.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 12:32 PM
3

reverse discrimination is an excuse for discrimination in favor of formerly underprivileged groups.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 12:31 PM
5

you don't get it. You have to take the money from the ones you can sue, the married ones. They signed away their rights and are easier prey. The unmarried men you have to exploit in other ways.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 12:30 PM
11

Great comment that clarifies many things. Still does not justify Indian laws.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 10:29 AM
-2

Here is a good comment. http://www.reddit.com/r/news/comments/pqz0v/sheriffs_union_completes_investigation_into_the/c3rn6x5 If the guy really behaved strangely, did several wrongs, then the police is much more justified. If he crashed the car through a gate, if kids said he behaved weird, if he disobeys orders of SEVERAL uniformed officers with police cars, then police can treat him like a dangerous person.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 10:28 AM
1

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2012/02/union-blames-marine-killed-by-deputy-for-fatal-shooting.html there seems to be more to it. Did he really crash the gate with his car? There were plenty of other police around, already talking to the kids?
/r/MensRights19/03/12 10:18 AM
6

and men being executed, tortured, killed in favelas on a larger scale. Why are only women crime victims a problem?
/r/MensRights19/03/12 10:04 AM
2

probably there never was a pay gap. Whenever women do the same for much less money, why would anyone waste his money hiring a man? Only because the half-as-expensive woman probably does NOT perform the SAME work
/r/MensRights19/03/12 09:58 AM
0

even if it looks equal, it isn't. Read Warren Farrell. The woman might have taken off 2 years, or work less hours, or have picked another more social less technical topic in University, or just be less competitive and hard working.
/r/MensRights19/03/12 09:55 AM
1

is this sarcasm? It is not immediately obvious that women don't have a chance to become the best snooker player. No brute force is needed. Which of course translates into feminist: women are absolutely equal and thus there is discrimination. Unless you posit men genetically have better hand eye coordination, or more ambition, or more variance in skills.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 10:32 PM
5

because feminism is expert at misleading, spreading false statistics, distracting from facts. In many issues. Pay, rape, domestic violence, .... Why else would Obama not get it?
/r/MensRights18/03/12 09:59 PM
1

please define precisely what this means. Also the relevance of your numbers. Lots of transvestites, but should be way under 1% of males. But yes, there are confusing things happening in Brazil, about having a third gender toilet at carnival, or allowing transvestites to use women's bath rooms.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 09:57 PM
2

What did they do to r/atheism? Please be specific. What is a redditbomb anyway?
/r/MensRights18/03/12 02:48 PM
2

I think if someone gets a good education in some hotel or restaurant school, they don't need to start at the very bottom. Still pretty far fetched that there is discrimination against women in chess, snooker, and cooking. Is there ANY field where women beat men, except synchronized swimming? (I don't believe men try to compete in such purely aesthetic sports).
/r/MensRights18/03/12 02:37 PM
3

amazing all these downvotes. (+4/-7) votes An extremely relevant topic. Not in tennis, not in chess, not even in snooker, and not even in cooking women can compete with the male elite. Probably not in CEO offices either, but women should get quotas there. Downvotes are probably knee jerk reaction to the somewhat provocative phrase "discrimination? or women can't perform cooking at the world elite level" It is one or the other. Can't be lack of women who learn cooking. Would this be a better titl…
/r/MensRights18/03/12 02:24 PM
3

It looks like they are MORE capable of being good cooks. Or rather, to be correct, MORE capable of being extremely good cooks
/r/MensRights18/03/12 01:32 PM
7

Relevant for quota discussion: should they give 40% of stars to women chefs??
/r/MensRights18/03/12 10:40 AM
3

That would get him discriminatiin lawsuits
/r/MensRights18/03/12 10:37 AM
1

these are nit-picky fine points. It looks like they did. They also did not distance themselves from that article.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 08:19 AM
1

please explain this. Or is this only the case if you CHOOSE sex filtering for your kids? I think google might give more relevance to feminism because it gets more links, more visits, more attention.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 08:17 AM
2

very relevant. Leading to the usual conclusion that women are emotional, not logical.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 08:08 AM
-1

nobody jumped to conclusions. They just offered a non-feminist narrative of what could have happened. This, of course, is a sacrilege in case the feminist narrative turns out right this time. Still NO PROOF the main suspect that was in her room did the drink spiking and that he raped her. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/qw7ap/update_to_yesterdays_girl_in_relationship/c418ef9 Would be very stupid to remain in her room if he could have gone in hiding after drugging and raping her. And …
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:46 AM
-1

We did not even accuse her of false rape accusations. She DOES NOT KNOW. Now considering the innocence of a guy when he turns out to be guilty, this is a terrible sacrilege? Is this how far we have gotten? Furthermore, it is amazing how now everyone thinks the guy in her room was a rapist. Just because SOMEONE drugged her? Assuming the story is true. No proof HE drugged her, no proof he RAPED her. Even MR is quick to condemn a guy just because of one unexpected test result. http://www.reddit.com…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:42 AM
-1

She did not make a false rape claim. She was very unsure about what had happened. And ASSUMING the drug test story is true (which is doubtful), this still does not prove the GUY IN HER ROOM did it, and that he did rape her. Amazing, not even at MR anyone gets to that conclusion. And it does NOT require for her to lie, as she does not know. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/qw7ap/update_to_yesterdays_girl_in_relationship/c418ef9
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:37 AM
1

100 is extremely significant if 100% of the "victims" were WRONG, nobody was drugged. That is VERY significant.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:34 AM
1

what? extremely small sample sizes? 97 who were conviced to have been drugged and NO ONE was?In Australia that has only a few million people? and 1014 rape victims is a small sample size? Only if you think that 1 in 4 are raped, so there are millions every year. Even then, 1000 is not a small sample.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:33 AM
1

right again. The fact that MR brings up the POSSIBILITY that the man did nothing bad, is badly needed information. Nobody said "the bitch is a liar like all women". MR just brought needed balance. Now everyone got quiet and I was the only one (downvoted) who still mentioned that there is no proof WHO gave that drug and if the friend who slept with her did anything to her. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/qw7ap/update_to_yesterdays_girl_in_relationship/c418ef9
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:24 AM
1

Right. Extremely important. The story is unlikely, but if it is totally true, we still absolutely can not jump to the conclusion that that one guy did it, just because he was in her room. He might go to prison for having brought a groggy woman into her room and saved her from her real drugger. See my comment http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/qw7ap/update_to_yesterdays_girl_in_relationship/c418ef9
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:21 AM
1

right, see my comment http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/qw7ap/update_to_yesterdays_girl_in_relationship/c418ef9
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:17 AM
0

I got seriously downvoted with this comment: Interesting how people jump to conclusions. The woman had Temazepam in her system. You think the guy that slept in her room gave it to her to have sex with her? I still can not believe he is that stupid that he remained at the scene of his crime instead of just quietly disappearing into his room. So, maybe he found her half passed out and thus took her to her room. He is a good samaritan. Would be very stupid of him to remain in her room if he could h…
/r/MensRights15/03/12 07:15 AM
2

The title is wrong. Women who attacked man on train JUSTIFIES her behavior, in addition to a meek excuse.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 09:32 AM
11

Sucking infant’s penis is legal in the US! If you first cut off his foreskin without anesthesia! It is in the best interest of the child /sarcasm
/r/MensRights14/03/12 09:02 AM
8

Family pictures of nude baby bath: ruinous child porn prosecution
/r/MensRights14/03/12 09:01 AM
0

Any way to get this declared unconstitutional? When is vasectomy needed to avert a danger to a man's life? Never? They forgot to make it a felony to get a vasectomy in another state or country. To cross state lines with the intent of getting a vasectomy. Also, being vasectomized could be considered fraud against one's wife. If she cannot get pregnant. Or, if she gets pregnant, you would know she was unfaithful.
/r/MensRights14/03/12 08:58 AM
8

statutory rape is a strict liability crime. By the law, being raped by a minor is no excuse for the crime of having sex with a minor. Just as having a valid ID by emitted by the state of Nevada, attesting she is 21 does not save a man from statutory rape charges. Of course, in the case of a woman, the law will be twisted. After all, one must not discourage victims from reporting. Yes, strict liability is stupid. But it is the law. http://www.law.arizona.edu/events/criminal_law/RussellChristopher…
/r/MensRights12/03/12 10:04 PM
0

believe me, feminists would not get discouraged by such a petty formality of being non-prescription. Feminists don't even discouraged if a woman commits pre-meditated murder, they still defend her and invent a psychological disorder just to tend to her needs. Invent a prescription-only condom. Make an exception for condoms being the only non-prescription item to be paid by insurance. Anything.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 09:58 PM
1

a pack of condoms are not cheaper then an unplanned pregnancy? Or the problem is that the unplanned pregnancy gets paid by ANOTHER insurance?
/r/MensRights12/03/12 09:56 PM
4

The men could retaliate and not buy from the tradesman. Or they could sue for harassment, creating a hostile environment If women were not concerned about so many trivial issues as being shocking and traumatizing and scarring for life, I would say forget this
/r/MensRights12/03/12 08:58 PM
2

had he married, it probably would have been worse ............
/r/MensRights12/03/12 08:15 PM
2

It has never happened. Nowhere in the world are women held accountable for how they spend child support money They are not even held accountable to obey court orders regarding father's visitation. Why? I wonder, too. Because they are women, I guess. And whatever women want and do is automatically in the best interest of the child
/r/MensRights12/03/12 08:14 PM
2

he could change his mind, had he been told the mother was dead and the kid was going off to a foster home. They could at least ASK the father. If then can CHARGE him child support
/r/MensRights12/03/12 08:12 PM
5

gender is socially constructed. Men and women are equal /s
/r/MensRights12/03/12 08:08 PM
1

actually, after they nearly destroy a company, they get a 8 million golden parachute, pay for the next 4 years they will not need to work, and a life long pension. But, until they get there, they have to compete pretty hard.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 08:07 PM
1

and women tennis players get paid on how loud feminists protest, and how much women's power intimidates Wimbledon officials.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 08:02 PM
2

Read more: Women's tennis: higher pay for weaker play, less work, less spectators, less advertising dollars Women get paid equally because women fought for it with all their might. The play less, so much less that they can play more games (doubles) so that they end up earning more at Wimbledon. Seats for the women's finals cost less ........ A good college player can whack the women's world champion Any more doubts? Why not let the free market decide premiums?
/r/MensRights12/03/12 08:01 PM
3

feminists focus on ALL aspects. Wherever women have a perceived disadvantage And ignore ALL examples where women have an advantage.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 08:01 PM
5

did you see the photo of the baby dick sucking man? This should be labeled nsfw!
/r/MensRights12/03/12 12:14 PM
15

if this was a just, non-sexist ideal world But it isn't Women are not held accountable.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 12:11 PM
8

is the same valid for math contests in high school? Statistics is complicated. it totally depends on how chess club members are selected from the general population. If it is random, or if the best math and chess talents get selected. Which just happen to be more men (a valid hypothesis to be tested). Just as your hypothesis is worthy of being tested. Now in the politically correct climate, and feminist academia, we don't expect that anything negative to feminists will get funding and attention.…
/r/MensRights12/03/12 11:01 AM
7

Thanks for the great link. The point is that it does not matter why there are few top women chess players. it is a fact that can not be remedied by quotas at the top. If anything, it can be remedied by FORCING women to start playing chess at the bottom. Equally, for quotas for women at top exec board in the work force.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 10:23 AM
-1

Note that in some places 95% of cases were dropped. Would this be because they condone abuse? or because they carefully and honestly analyze the cases quickly and then drop them? So that the real percentage of unfounded accusations could be much higher. After all, little kids have fantasies, can be influenced by parents and have not much sense of justice and punishment. So we can expect more false accusations then in the case of adult women's false accusations.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 10:20 AM
8

It does not really matter. If the mother were still alive and used all the child support money for clothes, alcohol, or drugs while the child lived in abject poverty, would anyone care? Jail the mother for stealing baby's money? Of course not.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 10:12 AM
1

what about the accuser's genders? is it equally boys and girls? Or rather, behind it are there more mothers or fathers?
/r/MensRights12/03/12 09:56 AM
-4

dont forget the /sarcasm He must have been mistreated, despised and ridiculed by women. /s
/r/MensRights12/03/12 09:53 AM
34

In Chess there is only one woman in the top 100. Judit Polgar, ranked #32, by far the strongest woman player with a score of 2710, never became woman’s world champion because she chose to only compete in men’s tournaments. The second rated woman, with a score of 2605 is way below the # 100 ranked man with 2652 points. There are 2300 male Grand Masters and 22 female Grand Masters. A clear case of discrimination exerted by the evil patriarchy that denies women their place in chess hierarchy. Maybe…
/r/MensRights12/03/12 09:22 AM
23

Women want a man with a home, so later at divorce time she can take his home away with her. Certainly so in Brazil, probably in the US. I believe that China put an end to this gold digging and lets people keep their own property after divorce.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 07:20 PM
2

never forget the feminist re-definition of rape. Men go to prison for decades for sins like: not having done an alcohol check on the woman, not having checked ID of a woman that was in a 21 and over bar etc. The perfidity of the new language is that everyone things that rape is forcible penetration. That was 50 years ago. Now there is 5 second rape, "I think I should go home" rape, etc.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 09:53 AM
9

Right Ever seen feminists trying to EMPOWER women to be able to survive and tolerate harassment without getting scarred for life? Like men do? Ever seen feminists trying to EMPOWER women to earn their own money, if they can take it away from a man? Ever seen feminists encouraging women to voluntarily FORFEIT alimony rights, because women are strong and independent? Note that the husband of a successful singer did just that and all or r/mensrights applauded. After all, a woman needs a man like a …
/r/MensRights11/03/12 09:47 AM
3

Great link. Feminists support other women unconditionally. SCUM authors, penis slicers, husband shooters, they all get fervently supported by even the most moderate feminists. Trying to find the full article without pay now.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 06:52 PM
3

Youtube: Dave Foley about child support http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9mZkYSxnOQ
/r/MensRights10/03/12 06:37 PM
2

and make sure all child support is accounted for or else imprison for embezzlement and theft of children's property
/r/MensRights10/03/12 06:24 PM
2

A historically repressed group is justified to hate their oppressors! /s
/r/MensRights10/03/12 12:51 PM
2

But the scum manifesto is not hate?
/r/MensRights10/03/12 12:47 PM
2

The important thing is not the anger Important is how can DNA evidence be contaminated by the accused's DNA? If we cannot trust DNA evidence, what else? His luck was that he never was in the city of the crime. Rather, it is not certain if that would have saved him. Few people have such luck to have extreme alibi evidence to disprove DNA evidence. Everyone should upvote this. This is an issue for all, human rights, men's rights and feminists. After all, nobody wants the rapist to go free and a to…
/r/MensRights10/03/12 10:39 AM
2

In the name of equality, the president found a loophole to single-handedly overturn the country's civil code (which already is biased against men with laws like Maria da Penha to protect women against domestic violence, and who had soccer players arrested for alimony when their success and money waned) Only the lawyer association shyly protested, based not in defense of male equality, but on legal formalities The Attorney General of the Association of Lawyers of Brazil (OAB), Ronaldo Cramer is c…
/r/MensRights10/03/12 10:21 AM
7

The name "My house, my life" shows the extreme importance of a first hard earned house. And this will automatically go to the woman! Even in the case of a simple "stable relationship" with no marriage, no children. Even if there is a pre-nup contract determining separation of property. Even if the relationship was short, even if the man exclusively paid for the house. There goes his dream in the name of equality for women The dream of a hard working guy who allowed his girl friend to live in wit…
/r/MensRights10/03/12 10:18 AM
10

She did not determine how to discriminate in same sex Gay and Lesbian stable relationships, which are legal in Brazil. LOL
/r/MensRights10/03/12 10:16 AM
8

How come Lorena Bobbitt has a feminist fan club? How come Lorena Bobbitt was defended by feminists Can anyone imagine MRA forming a fan club for this man? To say the victim had it coming? After all the perpetrator was clearly provoked by the victim who had an affair with the mother of his children. Can anyone imagine MRA starting a list of jokes about the victim? How come, then, MRA are supposed to be a hate group, but not feminists?
/r/MensRights10/03/12 08:25 AM
3

Compare this to Lorena Bobbitt: Lorena Bobbitt acted premeditated attacking a SLEEPING victim. In this case the perpetrator acted in the spur of the moment when victim told him about the affair. Lorena Bobbitt has a fan club. Defended by feminists. Lorena Bobbitt demanded and got an excuse by her victim
/r/MensRights10/03/12 08:21 AM
3

Original links: http://www.spiegel.de/unispiegel/studium/0,1518,820425,00.html German http://www.lefigaro.fr/flash-actu/2012/03/09/97001-20120309FILWWW00614-sexe-coupe-13-ans-ferme.php French
/r/MensRights10/03/12 08:18 AM
7

sexual desire. Need to get laid. Boredom And lack of supervision Impunity Of course, for the serviceman overseas, they finally removed almost all possibilities for sexual release. No more prostitutes near US bases, etc.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 08:31 PM
2

certainly not in religious rituals. I don't think they would be allowed to inject anesthesia. And anesthetic creme alone does not cut it Anyone has the stats on medical circumcision? Surprising that medics would not anesthetize in 1997.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 06:17 PM
1

Let us be open minded. Could the research be right? Certain types of men in certain societies are irresponsible and spend money for alcohol and stuff and let their family be hungry? Actually, it seems to me that certain low IQ low social status men might behave this way. So let MRA be honest and open minded instead of knee jerk reaction. Yes, lots of statistics are feminist forgery and dishonest science. But let us analyze this case if it holds water. Could be that women spend too much once basi…
/r/MensRights09/03/12 02:23 PM
35

Circumcision study halted due to trauma Up to 96 percent of the babies in the United States and Canada receive no anesthesia when they are circumcised, according to a report from the University of Alberta in Edmonton [in 1997 article]. One of the reasons anesthesia is not used, the study found, is the belief that infants feel little or no pain from the procedure. Some babies were given an anesthetic and others were not.But the researchers found that while topical anesthetics may help initially, …
/r/MensRights09/03/12 01:47 PM
9

Death by Herpes, the only worry? Cases of Herpes transmission without death did not cause major worry. Only the cases of death cause concern. Painfully cutting off a piece of a baby penis and then sucking the remaining penis is not traumatic? But tender touch, look, or even looking at photos of said penis scars the victim forever? Painlessly touching a baby's penis is extremely traumatic. Painful touch is not traumatic? We fail to understand such logic.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 01:45 PM
6

Fantastic article. Or should I say depressing? Or should I say infuriating. They are ruining good men's life forever, taking away possessions children, and FUTURE income. And feminists obsess about the scarring trauma of verbal and non-verbal harassment. Men, wake up!
/r/MensRights09/03/12 01:32 PM
6

and the opposite. If someone hides their face behind a burka, that is really threatening. Could be a man in disguise, carrying a bomb.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 01:26 AM
7

Don't forget the non-verbal harassment. Non-speech is also illegal.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 01:25 AM
9

By signing the Council of Europe convention, he will vow to take “necessary legislative measures” against anyone breaking the clauses within, by committing “verbal, non-verbal or physical" sexual harassment. "Hi Cutie" verbal harassment if you are too shy, better say nothing. "He looked me in the eyes and made me feel uncomfortable" Better look down. "He looked at my feet. This made me feel uncomfortable." Look away then. "He did not look at me at all. This is discriminating and offensive" Leave…
/r/MensRights09/03/12 01:23 AM
2

This is where they celebrate men's day. Mostly exotic African countries and Island states. Certainly it is celebrated less then women's day. Organizations in Trinidad and Tobago, Jamaica, Australia, Argentina, India, China, United States, Romania, Singapore, Malta, United Kingdom, South Africa, Tanzania, Zimbabwe, Botswana, Hungary, Ireland, Ghana, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, France, Italy, Pakistan, Grenada, Antigua and Barbuda, St. Lucia, St. Kitts and Nevis and C…
/r/MensRights08/03/12 09:55 PM
0

Why don't you enjoy the 4 Thursdays when they will lock out women in celebration of men's day /sarcasm
/r/MensRights08/03/12 09:47 PM
1

You can not discriminate against a traditionally repressed minority (ahem majority) like women. If you "discriminate" against men, it is only compensation for 2000 years of patriarchy and repression against women. It is legally and morally impossible to discriminate against men. It is only just compensation. Can't you get this? /sarcasm
/r/MensRights08/03/12 09:44 PM
4

These women want to fight in the army, work in police and fire fighters. Strong and equal. But cat calls and whistles are so damaging to them that they need the law to protect them to the point of jailing the terrible perpetrator? You should not hit a girl. Now you can not even be offensive to a girl in any way. And men can not even have their own clubs and societies where they are far away enough from women so they can speak their mind without fear of retribution and be spontaneous.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 09:40 PM
5

Calling a man a loser, a nerd, a wimp certainly will be criminalized too. Right? /sarcasm
/r/MensRights08/03/12 09:36 PM
5

Divorce costs more then being married. For women, divorce gives financial benefits. And for states, too. A married man, if he has no money, well his family has no money. He does not go to jail. Maybe they get welfare. The man does not have to return welfare.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 11:19 PM
2

Great story. typical example of child protection run amok.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 10:38 PM
2

and don't forget, nude 17 year olds, or even non-nude 15 year olds dancing can be child porn (google knox vs. USA). It escapes me where the abuse and victimization is.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 10:27 PM
2

Real terrorist decaptiation movies are not fiction. They show real people actually decapitated on camera. They are made because sensationalist media have a demand for gore and thus spread the message of the terrorist group. Similarly, there are adolescent children doing jackass movies, hurting and endangering children, and there is a demand on for profit sites for that. Also there are minors doing boxing and Thai boxing and dangerous football, seriously getting hurt. And there is a demand for th…
/r/MensRights07/03/12 10:25 PM
6

Of course, this is still equal to prohibiting a man to go to near a bank because a bank robbery movie has been found on his computer. From collecting child porn pictures to abusing one's own children, there still is quite a distance to be bridged.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 01:01 PM
1

Interesting. Worthy of the "false accidental download" society. Keep watching: just google "Nigel Robinson child porn" weekly to see the future developments.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 12:48 PM
2

More comments Reported accidentally downloaded child porn: computer taken for a year, needs supervision to see own child
/r/MensRights07/03/12 12:45 PM
2

What about anesthesia? This is torture sexual abuse. He KNEW he had herpes. He KNEW he had infected others before. This is a serious felony. Maybe he could have gotten someone else without herpes to do the ... sucking. It is knowingly grievously inflicting bodily harm resulting in death.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 09:55 AM
1

Piercing parlors are supposed to sterilize their equipment. They don't suck people's fresh piercings.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 09:43 AM
1

He first kicked past her hitting the edge of the TV. That is a pretty aggressive act but also a clear warning of his aggressive attitude, like a shot over the bow. It seems that she was in front of the TV accidentally, and he asked her pretty aggressively to get out of the way. Somehow the context is not very clear.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 08:52 AM
1

Sorry, google translation is really bad. In order to prevent baby killings, women are offered to anonymously get rid of the baby. Either leave them in special baby hatches and leave. Or hand them over anonymously. Or give birth anonymously and leave the baby. Nobody keeps any information about mother. Much less about father. The child's right to know is violated. A planned law wants to maintain anonymity for 10 years and then pass the information to the child. Anyone notice that re-gendering wou…
/r/MensRights07/03/12 08:46 AM
4

you mainly got positive answers favoring you. If you really are honest and looking for the truth, ask a few unbiased people if they agree with your vision. Some women (and some men) see themselves and others in distorted light. Do a reality check with other people. Tell them to be brutally honest with you. Just to make sure that your opinion is not biased, and that things are not different from what you think they are. The father's parents are good people to talk to. If they think he is irrespon…
/r/MensRights05/03/12 10:53 PM
4

citation please If they get the education, they will be hard pressed to get a job. Warren Farrell cited his own (anecdotal) evidence that male elementary school teachers get discriminated against and almost never get hired.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 09:57 PM
-1

who the hell is downvoting this? Please speak up, or we presume these are some downvote brigades.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 09:54 PM
7

You forgot quotas on death row, and in prisons!
/r/MensRights05/03/12 06:18 PM
1

the next day she FELT raped. So it is raped. After all a woman knows when she was raped. The guy honestly did not know he was a rapist when she enthusiastically grabbed him when she was drunk
/r/MensRights05/03/12 12:37 PM
8

Example: Green aliens landed in Chicago and rounded up 1479 math teachers. The bloodthirsty aliens then sucked the blood of 828 teachers and left them for dead. The aliens tied up the rest of the teachers and marched them into 3 UFOs. If there were an equal number of poor math teachers in each UFO, how many teachers were in each UFO? I am sure if it got rephrased, it would be OK. Tooth fairies came to the wedding of a prince in Chicago and called together 1479 wedding guests. They gave roses to …
/r/MensRights05/03/12 11:13 AM
3

To give credit, I found this originally here no sense of humor
/r/MensRights05/03/12 11:12 AM
14

Shocking. What is interesting, Warren Farrel has debunked the wage gap myth in about 2007. How women can earn more then men: 25 life choices to get higher pay It is shocking how feminism somehow systematically misleads humanity. Can't politicians read Warren Farrell? Or would anyone be able to disprove what he writes? As has been said here, women don't want to study and work like men in order to make as much as men. They want equality the easy way. Like in Tennis: equal prizes for less work, les…
/r/MensRights05/03/12 09:56 AM
5

That is amazing. Even if a women sticks a dildo, or a broomstick up a much younger minor's vagina our anus, it is not rape? Really shocking!! Maybe it is the law of Canada?
/r/MensRights05/03/12 09:54 AM
2

Right. Verbal teasing should not lead to violence. On the other hand, among boys verbal teasing naturally leads to rough and tumble measured limited violence: boys fight according to accepted rules, normally light wrestling where nobody gets seriously hurt. That is how things happened in my school and it was an honors codex not to complain about such things. Among boys. So the only question is if women should be included in this. Or if boys need to be feminized. Now interestingly, the proper LAW…
/r/MensRights05/03/12 09:52 AM
1

there must be some reason most people still BUY condoms. I doubt that there are enough free condoms if everyone started to pick them up for their own use. They are for a small minority of paupers, I believe. Certainly, they are of lower quality. maybe safe, but not sensitive or comfortable.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 03:56 AM
3

It is amazing that not more men who spend 20 years based on a blatant lie don't go out to kill the culprit that destroyed their life. No I don't advocate that. But spending 20 years in prison, totally innocent, thinking about who got you there, one might get some ideas of revenge. Ever seen Bronson movies?
/r/MensRights03/03/12 12:27 AM
1

well but she declared that her first testimony was under pressure. 8 year olds can be pressured pretty easily by crazy mothers.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 12:24 AM
1

well but she declared that her first testimony was under pressure. 8 year olds can be pressured pretty easily by crazy mothers.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 12:23 AM
1

what other evidence? A falsely interpreted test? And even if the test were true, attraction to young children does NOT mean the person will ACT upon it!
/r/MensRights03/03/12 12:23 AM
3

absolutely disgusting. Going to jail on the unsubstantiated claim of a little child, that can be influenced by a mother who has an axe to grind. This already shows how warped the justice system is in both rape and child abuse allegations. And then, after the accusing witness recants, to call the recantation not credible but still maintain the credibility of the initial testimony of the young child. This is all so wrong!
/r/MensRights03/03/12 12:20 AM
6

Let us suppose the woman is an honest woman who would never lie about birth control. And she is baffled. She pays the price for a) lots of woman are willing to lie about birth control to get pregnant on purpose. b) the legal system: no matter how much the woman lied, or even if she admits to it, the man has to pay, under the threat of prison c) there is no legally valid way in this world how a woman can assure she will take full responsibility for her pregnancy, or guarantee she will not become …
/r/MensRights02/03/12 11:55 PM
1

right. Even if you don't quit your job, you can get enough security so you can escape the boss. There are complaint procedures, you can avoid to be alone with him, ...... You can refuse to yield. You can dare him to fire you ... This is not comparable to being locked into a prison cell with 3 gang members for even a few hours, much less a few months.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 11:19 PM
1

Student teacher relationship still is not quite like nonviolent prisoner vs. criminal gang in jail. The student has the theoretical possibility to switch school or to switch classes. Furthermore he can make sure that he will not be alone with the teacher, can request grading by another professor, etc. The power differential is not insurmountable.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 11:14 PM
1

did he say so? or rather, is that proven and has been affirmed in court? In that case, most likely she would be charged with something. Probably the lame DA did not bother to try to incriminate her.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 10:24 PM
1

which is one of the motives for false rape accusations to police. The accuser did not plan to file a police report but was encouraged to do so. Instead of confessing the lie, the accuser would file a complaint with police.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 07:10 PM
5

thanks for the Holle link. This is disgusting. Ryan Holle had frequently loaned his car to the friend. Probably not for committing crimes. Just habitually loaned the car. And he was drunk when he let the car to his friend. And it is hard to refute his statement that he thought that the talk about the crime was a joke. Hell, he loaned the car, not a gun nor explosives or how-to-commit-a-crime manuals. What if he had given them clothes, or food? No clothes, no crime? Anyway, compare this to the wo…
/r/MensRights02/03/12 07:06 PM
1

after birth abortion usually refers to a) the first month of life b) women that have no way of reasonably raising the child (due to poverty, other kids, or the child's serious disability) It never would justify neither a 3 year old nor a revenge killing if a father is able and willing to raise the child.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 06:34 PM
4

did not even read this yet. BUT if you are in jail sharing a cell with a huge violent criminal rapist, then you probably will consent to voluntary sex when threatened to be raped violently next time you go to sleep So here you are talking TRUE power differential. Especially because you have to SLEEP at some time. Worse even if you face SEVERAL potential attackers. You in need of sleep vs. a gang of rough career criminals. This is true power differential. Of course, feminists don't want solutions…
/r/MensRights02/03/12 09:14 AM
2

You should definitely read up about validity of pre-nups. One issue is that, in the future, when she is not cooperative, she can claim that she did not know what she was doing (signing away her RIGHTS), and also that she was FORCED by you (or else you might not marry or not love her any more). Thus the prenup is invalid, obtained under duress and due to legal ignorance. A good prevention is to have her have her own lawyer at signing. Now I don't know how anyone can possibly get onto a legal titl…
/r/MensRights02/03/12 09:10 AM
1

please explain "judgement proof"
/r/MensRights02/03/12 12:06 AM
13

Of course, women are under-represented in prison. This is one of the reasons. Obviously this is due to discrimination. We need longer sentences for women so women will get more equal representation in prison.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 11:56 PM
3

sure you will be banned. You don't understand that a member of a privileged class can not complain about such small petty issues. Look at your privileges. There is no such thing as discrimination against a privileged class. It is called affirmative action. /sarcasm
/r/MensRights01/03/12 11:55 PM
0

exactly. This is why condoms should be covered by insurance, if female birth control is covered.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 11:45 PM
-2

especially if she does not "forget" to take it. The woman benefits from you using a condom. Why is that not covered by insurance?
/r/MensRights01/03/12 11:44 PM
-5

why are condoms not covered?
/r/MensRights01/03/12 11:43 PM
-1

are we getting funding for condoms?
/r/MensRights01/03/12 11:42 PM
-4

Because women may "forget" the pill and then you pay 20 years of child support. Amazingly nobody mentions that insurance should pay condoms. After all they truly prevent VD, so they serve a real health reason. Also they save the cost of pregnancy and of abortions.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 11:42 PM
-2

Exactly. Medical hormone therapy should be covered. We are talking about BIRTH CONTROL with no other medical need.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 11:40 PM
-4

It covers "birth control", not hormonal therapy for irregular menstruation etc. It specifically says "birth control" It also probably covers IUD and other birth control methods? Does it cover male birth control, which is condoms?
/r/MensRights01/03/12 11:38 PM
2

The mobile version did not have the video. Saw it later on my laptop
/r/MensRights01/03/12 11:21 PM
2

He must have abused her to deserve this. had he died she could have invoked battered woman defense. A corpse cannot prove otherwise.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 07:56 PM
7

Fighting with police alone is at least 4 months. Attempted murder isn't even mentioned. The article mentioned "fighting with police", not just "resisting arrest".
/r/MensRights01/03/12 07:52 PM
1

Where is the video?
/r/MensRights01/03/12 07:49 PM
1

alleged adultery and alleged murder, as the famous case in Iran.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 09:00 AM
2

This is r/mensrights? And nobody gives a good reply to this comment? The first confuses correlation with causation. Somewhere else it was said that larger companies do more "reverse discrimination" by desperately putting any reasonably qualified women into the highest possible position. For fear of lawsuits. The last is clearly explained by Warren Farrell. It has to do with women's choices of shorter work hours, etc (25 reasons total). Plus the biological fact that men have larger variance on al…
/r/MensRights26/02/12 12:42 AM
0

Rape cases are the exception. No corroborating evidence is needed, the anonymous accuser can not be cross examined, etc. A mere accusation gets you jailed. Strauss-Kahn would never have been jailed, had someone accused him of robbery with no corroborating evidence. Rape Laws: dismantling of due process explained step by step Now in non-rape cases, there rarely are malicious false accusations. How many false accusations are there of bank robbery? Or of car theft?
/r/MensRights25/02/12 06:10 PM
2

Where does the expressen Schrodinger's Accusation come from? What does it mean? Any explanation?
/r/MensRights25/02/12 06:09 PM
-3

It depends very much on which of the 20 types of rape we are talking about. It is the perfidy of feminist language obfuscation, that even her at r/mr we always assume that rape was forcible and violent, even though we should know better
/r/MensRights25/02/12 09:31 AM
1

I keep stressing to be aware of 20 types of rape
/r/MensRights25/02/12 09:30 AM
-2

True to a certain extent. Again, it depends which of the 24 types of rape we are talking about And women are very good at dramatizing. See the literature on harassment about the devastation of being looked at, suffer objectifying gaze, etc. Men are more quiet about 30 years of rape then some women are about an objectifying gaze. Men are told to get over it, whatever they suffer. Women are told to become aware of the amount of injustice they suffered. in short: while true forcible rape is terribl…
/r/MensRights25/02/12 09:29 AM
-3

Probably most accused are jailed. See Strauss-Kahn. No additional proof needed, other then the accusation. Not sure about the rape percentage. But in the US, or in developing countries, it is quite high. If the alleged rapist is young and handsome, the percentage should be quite high. Especially because true criminals despise rapists and single them out for special punishment in prison. If not rape, then beatings.
/r/MensRights25/02/12 09:21 AM
-1

RIGHT. Being locked up in prison, even if "only" for a few months, is pretty traumatic and life changing. I have to keep reminding, that for such comparisons, it is necessary to analyze which TYPE of rape a true victim suffered. If it was the type of consensual-but-lightly-drunk-rape type, then I would say even a day in jail is worse. Or if it was consensual statutory rape of a 17 year old. Now if it was forcible rape rape, with no further injuries, one has to make careful comparisons. But even …
/r/MensRights25/02/12 09:19 AM
3

Magistrate Paul Meyers ruled last month Byron had violated the protection order preventing him from 'causing plaintiff or the child of the parties to suffer physical and/or mental abuse, harassment, annoyance or bodily injury.' This means that he can not anything that annoys her. If, for example, he gets a girl friend, goes to a brothel, or even if he wins the lottery, all this might cause annoyance to his wife, thus violate the restraining order. So, obviously, saying anything bad about her to …
/r/MensRights24/02/12 06:09 PM
2

In the US an employment office can not give an IQ test. Because IQ tests have an disproportionate adverse impact on blacks, which have a lower IQ. Race and IQ Maybe this is the reason why they had to offer separate physical education test scores for men and women in firefighters and in the army? After all, running, pushup, lifting tests have a disparate impact against women.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 08:34 AM
3

exactly. A girl risks pregnancy. She can avoid it, by getting an abortion. Or by taking a pill beforehand. A boy can not avoid child support, except by using a condom (which might fail). So if they do birth control, then it is legal? That would actually be a sensible rule: avoid unwanted teenage pregnancy. Or do not outlaw sex, outlaw impregnating minors. Jail them if the girl got pregnant. Still not a good idea: jail the breadwinner, so the child will be unsupported and fatherless. But, that ha…
/r/MensRights24/02/12 08:27 AM
2

or women reclaiming "slut"
/r/MensRights24/02/12 05:22 AM
7

don't forget: the female equivalent for male porn is the romance novel. It is degrading and demeaning to men to read these stories about the young attractive rich doctor with the Ferrari who finally gets conquered by the main actress. The guy is much more attractive then we can ever be. In these romances the hero often takes the woman with force or outright rapes her. And the heroine likes it. Very demeaning literature, totally legal. Because unlike women, men don't bother about what the other s…
/r/MensRights23/02/12 08:13 PM
2

Posts on Prostitution Feminist arguments against prostitution debunked Human Stupidity attacks the child pornography witch hunt (54 posts), which is a far bigger taboo then pornography. You can take arguments from the child porn articles and apply them to pornography Specifically the research by Milton Diamond who showed that legally available child porn reduces sex crimes against children. I believe that the same reputable researcher Milton Diamond had shown that availability of pornography red…
/r/MensRights23/02/12 08:04 PM
1

Link is dead. Page does not exist
/r/MensRights23/02/12 05:40 PM
2

Reverse the genders! A man screams and alerts police, because a woman put her hand on his shoulder. On a crowded campus. Not a gender issue?
/r/MensRights23/02/12 05:38 PM
-5

relevant to men's rights a) shows there are male crazies in this world b) certainly feminist sites would rail about such a case and think it is relevant to feminism
/r/MensRights19/02/12 06:39 AM
1

relevant to men's rights a) shows there are male crazies in this world b) certainly feminist sites would rail about such a case and think it is relevant to feminism Original story is here www.cnn.com/2012/01/31/world/asia/afghanistan-strangulation/index.html
/r/MensRights19/02/12 06:37 AM
2

no, in family court you will pay even if proven innocent
/r/MensRights19/02/12 06:27 AM
2

again: this is so normal. women do it all the time and feel justified. Where is the quote of the survey where women replied they would deceive a man to get pregnant?
/r/MensRights19/02/12 06:24 AM
-1

did she get pregnant because she deceived you? Then you are a good man who allowed a woman to deceive you and still are in a good mood to take care of the child. Well, if it happened several times (your "children") .........
/r/MensRights19/02/12 06:23 AM
3

this is your wish. And you would probably make a good father But other men have other wishes. You should probably look around, there probably are plenty of women who look to get pregnant too and want a father. Try advertising in the right places. Of course, be aware of the financial and emotional responsibilities.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 06:22 AM
7

Wasn't there a citation here recently, about 42 (or 70?) or more percent of women declaring they would deceive a man to get pregnant. So why get upset about the site. This is reality. Women do this, women think it is morally right, and other women will support her fully. Maybe even other men. Should I put /sarcasm? I am telling the truth, it is no joke. Of course, if men were like feminists, they would set out to change the laws and fight for the changes until they are done. Again, financial abo…
/r/MensRights19/02/12 06:18 AM
4

right. But it SHOULD be so. If the man has no guilt, he should not pay ..... This is what is wrong about child support laws. And, again, if daddy has no financial means, if he is in jail, if he dies, if she has a one night stance and does not even know his name, then this is how things work. And how they always worked until a century ago. It would be bad enough that he would have the burden of proof. It should be the other way around, she needing to prove he had agreed to having a child. Well, I…
/r/MensRights19/02/12 06:00 AM
5

what makes this so immoral are the government enforced child support law. A couple of decades ago, at least in 3rd world country, a decision to get pregnant would be a woman's decision that would not necessarily affect the man. She would get herself a child she would be responsible for. I had several women proposing to me they wanted my child and would not want any support. Such contracts, unfortunately, are legal. Only valid if dad has no means to support. I have the feeling I will get downvote…
/r/MensRights19/02/12 05:58 AM
3

Imagine this happening to Hillary Clinton.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 05:44 AM
2

that certainly would be an acceptable explanation if a man's arms fall naturally on her buttocks or breasts. /sarcasm Can she not raise her arms?
/r/MensRights19/02/12 05:40 AM
1

this is the sexual trade union theory of www.theantifeminist.com It is relevant, because he extends it to prohibition of prostitution, increase of age of consent, all of which eliminate men's sexual options.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 09:46 PM
1

should there be a /s or are you serious? In case you are serious, did you see the stuff I was posting? Like policeman shot to death because the did an emergency arrest for his consensual relationship with a 17 year old!?
/r/MensRights18/02/12 01:04 PM
3

And a large number of school girls wish their teachers would fuck them. Probably a smaller number (any hard data on that?) but everyone knows it, right? Of course, women are not responsible for their sexual desires while men are evil predators /s
/r/MensRights18/02/12 09:19 AM
1

does the article mention that he aliented his fellow men at mensrights? That is probably irrelevant!
/r/MensRights18/02/12 09:17 AM
1

Finally, this submission made it. I carefully refrained from any mention of sex and underage. This seems to be the problem. Still, other submitters managed to get the same topic posted that was rejected when I posted it 8 hours before. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/puwr8/39_year_old_woman_jailed_for_40_years_for_sex/ approved http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/puldr/teacher_assistant_shannon_alicia_schmieder/ censored Am I on a special "pedophile watch"? Please read the ti…
/r/MensRights18/02/12 09:12 AM
0

I wonder why your submission did not get censored by the spam filter and mine did. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/puldr/teacher_assistant_shannon_alicia_schmieder/ http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/pv2t0/it_is_outrageous_what_recently_got_censored_by/
/r/MensRights18/02/12 09:08 AM
1

While naturally beautiful and socially astute women and men hold an advantage, Ms. Hakim notes that anyone can increase their erotic capital. Boosting your appeal can be as simple as smiling or it can include dieting, personal trainers, fashion and even plastic surgery. Although erotic capital can be used by men and women alike, Ms. Hakim feels that women have a longer tradition of developing and exploiting it.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 08:27 AM
2

this is completely crazy. attacking a man when he is carrying a small child. This is felony child endangerment. Probably got his teeth punched out because he protected the child. Furious grandma deserved to be knocked out in self defense and defense of the child. Imagine what would have happened to him had he properly defended himself. I would have kicked her seriously, to knock out, while holding the child. Now all this happened because of chivalry. The victim man should have called police on t…
/r/MensRights17/02/12 01:15 PM
2

Any man can be put to jail at any time! For crimes like getting teeth knocked out by a woman! This is the result of the style of feminism. And of men letting it happen unopposed. Also Are you aware that knocked out front teeth can never be repaired completely?
/r/MensRights17/02/12 11:51 AM
1

2 adolescent girls flashed their beasts on public highway. Man takes photo. Man arrested. It was on r/mr.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 11:35 AM
2

He should be grateful he is only ignored and not getting arrested. /sarcasm
/r/MensRights17/02/12 07:56 AM
6

What if a 17,15,13 year old go topless? If a guy photographs them, on purpose or inadvertently, it is child porn! Or do you need proof of being over 18 to go topless?
/r/MensRights16/02/12 09:07 PM
2

domestic stealing. Why is this so different from domestic physical or sexual abuse. Money abuse A man withholding some of HIS hard earned money can be domestic abuse. And a woman STEALING her son's money is not? Maybe it was abuse on his part to not give it voluntarily
/r/MensRights16/02/12 11:54 AM
1

amazing how many downvotes. Nothing is a mens rights issue any more. Even if it is not it is an interesting gender issue. Man fighting for his country and his own mother stealing from him
/r/MensRights16/02/12 11:50 AM
0

note there is a slideshow of over 20 photos. Certainly a local protest over gas prices staged by men would not make it into the South American press
/r/MensRights16/02/12 10:49 AM
1

there are scientific ways to do this. The problem is that "ethics" committees worry about fathers finding out the truth and thus will not allow it. Just get a random sample of kids and test them together with father and, to be safe, mothers. One could even keep the results secret, but it already would call attention If there were random blood samples for other issues, like hereditary disease, this could be used to piggyback the fatherhood research.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 10:35 AM
-13

Last September, King Abdullah granted Saudi women the right to vote in the next election cycle in 2015 and to run as candidates in future municipal elections. This is the beginning of the end. Wait for feminists to demand monogamy, child support, no fault divorce, age of consent of 18 years, rape convictions without corroborating evidence and rape shield laws, .....
/r/MensRights16/02/12 10:31 AM
1

If your wife really cooperates you probably don't need a lawyer. But, as I said, make sure you find out the correct procedure so you don't lose a deadline to oppose paternity. File whatever paper is necessary at some court just to make sure your opposition is clear.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 10:05 AM
2

Probably costs 79 per person, and should be done by an institute accredited by the ABB?? some American association of blood banks I believe. But again, you should make sure there is no statute of limitations to your protest. You should serve your wife, the hospital, the registrar, the court with your official protest. Or at least have your wife sign off to you that she recognizes that you are not the father (who knows, this might not be legally binding).
/r/MensRights16/02/12 10:02 AM
1

and men are not up in arms? Do such injustice to women and the streets fill, and talk shows are taken over by women to protest the injustice. This is crazy. If anything they could be required to ask for DNA test. It looks like government worried that poor guys sign the birth certificate so the well off husband gets off the hook. True Arch is really lucky his wife does not want to stiff him. Still I strongly advise to act quickly because I have a strong suspicion that he might lose his rights wit…
/r/MensRights16/02/12 10:00 AM
-13

I would post this to 2x too, but most probably it would be censored away anyway. Most men's rights are egalitarian. But some might think as Saudi Arabia as the last Bastion that has not yet been taken over by feminism. Dare to come out of the closet (and be down-voted)? Do you agree or disagree: once women are given rights, they expand them. They want equal prize money for unequal performance, they want Title IX so they get equal scholarships for sports nobody wants to watch and where not enough…
/r/MensRights16/02/12 09:54 AM
2

Not a men's rights issue? Urgent arrest while armed, because of alleged consensual sexual relationship with a 17 year old? Can anyone find a mainstream press report about this case? Probably 80 % of 17 year old girls fancy men 18 and over, while only very few 17 year old boys manage to land an older woman. Note also that girls mature faster then men, and that all over the world the marriagable age was and still is lower for girls. http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality/hummer-…
/r/MensRights15/02/12 07:09 PM
3

so here the question again: what does that have to do with men's rights? Actually, I am glad to read that story. Interesting. But I frequently get bombed with that same question on items that clearly have to do with feminist legislation. Here we just are dealing with an idiot judge - 3 felonies to save 280 dollars in parking fines. What a moron.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 12:57 PM
4

Excuse the ignorant question: why is this a men's rights issue? How come nobody asks this question?
/r/MensRights15/02/12 12:55 PM
6

Anyone has more details? Just looks like one man getting shafted for some lame accusations. Or is he a violent uncontrollable jerk that can not be trusted near his daughter? Does Halle Berry have such a bad taste to have picked a criminal?
/r/MensRights15/02/12 12:01 PM
5

Sex has more serious consequences for boys then for girls: The double standard should be inverted! In this modern age boys need more protection then girls (due to slower maturation, existing laws and scientific progress) adolescent girls mature faster then boys, physically, intellectually and psychologically. Legal age for marriage was, and still is much lower for girls then for boys in most countries in the world (Marriagable Age | Wikipedia, Elisabethan marriage customs, Historical Age of Marr…
/r/MensRights15/02/12 12:00 AM
3

Drugging boys into conformity. Into conformity with unnatural quiet sit-still school life. Aggravated by the feminzation (sp?) of school. Pharmacological control of men from earliest age. Please upvote! The article does not even mention the serious long term side effects. Teenagers consider Ritalin a safe drug to try out because it is widely prescribed to classmates and siblings. So they experiment and soon find out that it feels good and acts just like an amphetamine and, therefore, can be abus…
/r/MensRights14/02/12 09:49 AM
2

Michael Jordan had various biological advantages, height being one. Yes, people get paid for their biological advantages. Others have a genius IQ, another biological advantage. If they get the education commensurate with their IQ they probably will get very prestigious jobs. So yes, this is meritocracy. People get paid for their biological advantages.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:30 PM
1

From the article: Let us get equal prize money for the children’s tennis champion, the over 70 year old master’s champions (they spent 60 years training, and thus should get bigger prizes), the handicapped people’s special Olympics champion. After all, they are all champions! One should not discriminate by age or handicap! And of course, the featherweight boxer should get the same prize money as the heavy weight champion of all categories. What about a midget category in basket ball? Why should …
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:25 PM
1

Right. Kournikova had biological advantages that got her to have much more income then she should have gotten from her Tennis ranking. She also certainly drew large crowds of spectators and TV audience, and probably was NOT paid more then the plainer looking Should she pass some of that on to the men?
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:22 PM
14

r/mensrights is a hate group, spreading misogyny. They want to take children away from their mothers, they want men to stop paying alimony so women will starve, they want women to get lower pay. They are a sexist group promoting hate crimes /sarcasm
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:02 PM
-5

I am shocked that the moderator or men's rights sounds like a moderate feminist. Overlooks the clear arguments of sexism against men, of equal money for weaker play, for less spectators, for cheaper seats, for shorter game. The only argument for women is: well they are women and play at the same place. Even the standard press and some male players come up with clear counter-arguments. Check this guy and see how weak the pro-equality arguments are, as opposed to the free market pay by merit argum…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 02:53 PM
1

still not even. Women play much worse, get blown off the field by any mediocre men. And unless they look like Kournikova, their games are more boring.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:27 PM
5

the problem arose because they play at the same event, in the same place, the same period, for the "same" title. This is how feminism wedged in and cried foul
/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:25 PM
1

Let us get equal prize money for the children’s tennis champion, the over 70 year old master’s champions (they spent 60 years training, and thus should get bigger prizes), the handicapped people’s special Olympics champion. After all, they are all champions! One should not discriminate by age or handicap! And of course, the featherweight boxer should get the same prize money as the heavy weight champion of all categories. What about a midget category in basket ball? Why should midgets get paid l…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 11:24 AM
2

Women tennis players get the same pay for less work (shorter sets), lower performance (they are chanceless against any male top 500 player), less productivity (they have less spectators that pay less). In other words, women’s equal prize money gets subsidized by the performance of the males. Equal prize money actually leads to Wimbledon top 10 women getting higher pay then men: because women play shorter games, they have time to make extra money in more games, like doubles. Women also tend to ge…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 11:23 AM
1

additionally, the numbers seem very low. Probably lots of under-reporting. Anyone ever checked on the research methods? A lot of guys that "willingly" become sex slaves to avoid being forcibly raped, are they counted? They probably don't even see themselves as rape victims. For every rape victim: how many instances of rape or involuntary sex acts happen per year? Maybe dozens and hundreds? For every rape victim: how many rapists they get raped by. Or maybe when they "voluntarily" agree to be ren…
/r/MensRights12/02/12 09:59 AM
3

Great article, but I am shocked that this terrible issue barely gets any vote even at r/mensrights. Post a story of one single 5 minute date "rape" at a feminist reddit and you see how women care about sexual assault against their own. Some funny Imgur picture gets 20 times more votes then a life and death issue of years of physical and psychological torture and serious health damage. As a result, the terrible issue of being locked up for years, with your rapist, at his disposal, is downplayed a…
/r/MensRights12/02/12 09:56 AM
0

Sad. A suggestion for action. Gets down voted into oblivion!
/r/MensRights11/02/12 01:40 PM
2

Will they give free condoms to men? Or only women have the right rio birth control? Condoms are, additionally a public health issue, even for women!
/r/MensRights11/02/12 01:28 PM
0

good advice. Now if he really is a monster rapist, a violent assailant, I would think it over. But, maybe he was a date-rapist who had consensual sex with a tipsy girl who had a few drinks.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 06:47 PM
5

This is the result of cunning feminist re-definition of rape. Even people here, who know better, assume that "rape" is "rape-rape". He could have been her sweetheart when she was 17 and be convicted of statutory rape. Maybe she was adult but drunk and she herself initiated sex. Maybe it was a false rape accusation, but he had no video proof of his innocence. Maybe she is worried the kid will hear the true story from the father. Or maybe he is a brute that attacked her in the park at night, with …
/r/MensRights10/02/12 06:45 PM
0

is reddit broken? 9 comments, but only 2 show up?
/r/MensRights10/02/12 05:36 PM
1

It says: 8 comments but there are only 2 comments (3 after this post) What kind of censorship is going on here?
/r/MensRights10/02/12 05:33 PM
-2

it just so happens that this is one of the rare cases where a woman has significantly higher income then the husband. And the white knight husband forfeits a right that no reasonable women ever would forfeit.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 11:51 PM
-6

Women don't do the Right Think, and only men do the Right Thing (in the extremely rare cases where they earn less then the women) Not a men's rights issue? I am so shocked
/r/MensRights08/02/12 11:49 PM
3

has a women ever gotten a public backlash for taking 50% of her husband's money? Even if she was independently wealthy? I am shocked.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 11:45 PM
0

shocking how this guy gets downvoted. No to equality, long live men giving up privileges that every women takes for granted. Is this r/feminism?
/r/MensRights08/02/12 11:44 PM
-4

Sure. Women get their husband's money, men voluntarily don't get their wife's money. Not a men's rights issue. Such as the Titanic "women first" is not a men's rights issue eigher. /s
/r/MensRights08/02/12 11:43 PM
2

Great. Now let Russell, with the support of r/mensrights start a legal drive to rescind female privilege to get free money from their husbands.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 11:42 PM
-11

A white knight who does not accept the privilege that women happily accept, supported by white knight courts and white knight legislators. Ever seen a woman acting the same way? Since the couple had no prenuptial agreement when they wed in India in 2010, Brand is now entitled to approximately $20 million of Katy's hard-earned cash. But according to TMZ, Russell doesn't want a cent from his estranged popstar wife. And some idiot down there says this is not a men's rights issue? Is this the offici…
/r/MensRights08/02/12 11:41 PM
5

51 per cent of the population are women 5.6 per cent of the population are Black, Asian and minority ethnic women (source ONS Experimental 2007 Population Estimates by Ethnic Group. It is estimated that the percentage of females that define themselves outside the categories of 'White British', 'White Irish' and White Other' is 5.56 percent of the total population of England and Wales.) 10 per cent of the population are disabled women 20% of women are disabled? According to the British home offic…
/r/MensRights08/02/12 11:26 PM
1

Maybe you guys are imagining forcible rape, but there are 24 more types of rape The type of "I consented but was too drunk" rape is easily avoided. Don't drink! Sorry, already blaming the victim of her own drinking. Do you also notice that the father is threatening with criminal violence. So if daughter claims she does not remember she consented, father will commit a felony and beat the poor guy she enthusiastically had sex with when she was drunk last night.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 10:36 AM
1

I mean it is defined as rape by todays laws. If the abuser was a man, would you complain?
/r/MensRights07/02/12 04:44 PM
3

A child in custody of a sex offender! Only because she is a woman
/r/MensRights07/02/12 04:42 PM
2

Don't like the law? Fight for change!
/r/MensRights07/02/12 04:40 PM
2

That is impossible. Hillary Clinton herself would lead the boycott against Dannon. Feminists would NEVER accept even 1/10th of this violence without SERIOUS repercussions
/r/MensRights07/02/12 04:44 AM
1

she slapped him really lightly and then totally seduced him. Re-gendered it would still upset feminists, of course. No amount of violence against women is justified, not even a friendly slap. /s
/r/MensRights07/02/12 03:03 AM
2

call for a boycott of all Dannon products. If this could spread, it would be heard. With the genders inverted, certainly feminists would call for a boycott. That boycott would continue until Dannon apologized and made some donation to some women's shelters. The violence was really gratuitous. She could have retaliated in some funny way, stolen his yoghurt container, or, as lighter violence, thrown some yoghurt in his face. But a dangerous head butt, that is outrageous.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 02:50 AM
5

add to this that the violence against the woman was a son tackling her without injuries, and the violence against the man was a serious smacking head butt that knocked him off his chair cold ........... Conclusion: major violence against men is less of a problem then smaller violence against a woman
/r/MensRights07/02/12 02:45 AM
-2

She knocked the poor guy right off his chair with a violent head butt. Gratuitous violence. Even boxing matches and no holds fights do NOT allow such head butts. Hilarious and funny when perpetrated against a man /sarcasm
/r/MensRights07/02/12 01:30 AM
-1

Check the commercial. This is unprovoked, unannounced gratuitous violence. Even boxing matches and Ultimate fighting don't allow such head butts. She almost knocked him out. Really hilarious /sarcasm
/r/MensRights07/02/12 01:28 AM
3

What bout another revenge prank: Guys could lace girls' drinks with Rohypnol. Would be a wonderful prank. Hilarious all these girls drowsy and falling asleep. Lacing drinks should not be punished, certainly no criminal prosecution. /sarcasm
/r/MensRights07/02/12 01:05 AM
-2

If women had taken the laxatives, it would cancel the birth control pill's effect and she could get pregnant. Now that is serious damage
/r/MensRights07/02/12 12:47 AM
1

which scientist can not write in English? Please explain. But, anyway, even if there are some mistakes in English, a genius scientist can be dyslexic, if his research methods are sound, that does not take away from the truth of his statements. Also, there are many scientists who can not write in Chinese. It is, though, a convenient method to distract from the truth of the statements. But nevertheless, what is the evidence that which scientist can not write in English?
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:35 PM
2

posted this there already. Unfortunately it will not help. unfortunately, female rapists get rewarded with child support. Child support arrays can get a man in jail. No, I am not kidding. Female rape victims can abort or give up the child for abortion. The are never forced to care for the baby for 21 years. Men are. Even if mother cheated, lied, or raped: father always pays child support.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:11 AM
2

This is a rare case where there is plenty of evidence. I am surprised they don't simply declare that she was unable to consent. But blood on a brush handle etc, really does not even happy with kinky sex. I also was wondering if the guy was in a state he should have driven
/r/MensRights05/02/12 03:25 AM
2

This article is based on How feminists corrupt Domestic Violence research. Human-Stupidity generalizes the article: political correctness uses such methods to falsify and distort research on other topics, too.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 03:02 AM
1

why was mother not concerned with daughter and clarified issues before it was late? Why is this so terribly traumatizing for a girl? Maybe to find out your father is not your father, and, worse, your mother is a lying cheat? How come nobody is concerned with the children when father goes to jail for some feminist invented crime (child support, false accusations leveled by wife, ....)
/r/MensRights04/02/12 03:23 PM
2

Not much has changed. Justice for the deceived man has a low priority. And no negative word about the cheating mom A lower court ruled against Fischer, saying that he "had held himself out to be the younger daughter's father, that he had caused her to rely on him to meet her financial and emotional needs, and that revealing her true parentage after she had been led to believe for her whole life that [Fisher] was her father, would be detrimental to her emotional well-being." This week, the seven …
/r/MensRights04/02/12 01:36 PM
4

Women can not compete against men even in chess or snooker. Or math. This is due to thousands of years of evil patriarchy /sarcasm Patriarchy of the 1800's has irreparably upset modern women's self confidence in math competitions. So this injustice has to be repaired. Of course, if they really checked the true reasons (men are overrepresented in the highest gifted category, certainly for having a greater variance and maybe for having a higher mean math talent) then they could not defend quotas f…
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:26 AM
2

This, of course, raises the question, if the sexual rules of the Biblical age need to still be valid in the age of condoms, birth control and DNA testing. Most rich men can perfectly have extramarital fun and still keep their marital obligations. Tiger Wood certainly took good care of his family.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:04 AM
1

It seems the general default consensus that a woman is OBLIGED to dump and/or punish an unfaithful philandering husband. It happened to Tiger Woods. You can see the poor woman in the defensive for standing by her man. But in an interview published in the latest Elle magazine, Ms Sinclair insists that there was no need to leave him. 'I am neither a saint nor a victim,' she said, adding defiantly: 'I am a free woman.' Many in Paris argue that such unflinching loyalty will make Ms Sinclair's new jo…
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:02 AM
4

Well if that motivates women to care about raped men, it is a good start. Not the noblest of motives. But better then total ambivalence. If women care about sexually assaulted men because it also helps raise awareness for sexually assaulted women. Note also that very few men will ever complain about being date raped while slightly drunk. Men usually complain about forcible rape-rape.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 09:43 AM
1

Not a men's rights issue? Urgent arrest while armed, because of alleged consensual sexual relationship with a 17 year old? Can anyone find a mainstream press report about this case? Probably 80 % of 17 year old girls fancy men 18 and over, while only very few 17 year old boys manage to land an older woman. Note also that girls mature faster then men, and that all over the world the marriagable age was and still is lower for girls. http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality/hummer-…
/r/MensRights31/01/12 09:39 AM
20

Here is the top rated comment I ran into the same problem with our soccer team. We allowed at a younger age for boys and girls on the same team. A 6 year old girl got hit hard, "by accident", by a boy. She had a mild concussion and had to stay one night in the hospital for observation. Her parents sued for hospital bills, and pain and suffering. We then decided to not allow girls on the boys team, but we did start a girls team for them. Two parents of girls sued because of it. We then talked to …
/r/MensRights31/01/12 12:58 AM
7

This is what happens when a man fights back with equal force How Can She Slap? Abusive woman slaps guy, he slaps back equally and gets mauled and beaten by a dozen men on TV show. Nobody helps the male victim.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 12:47 AM
1

Women are the only ones accepted to contact or search Afghan women. According to the officer they are doing the same thing, fighting the same war. They should be allowed to fight at front lines, so they can have better chances at being promoted. Check this, too. Women Marines: U.S. Employs Secret Weapon in ... Women Marines: U.S. Employs Secret Weapon in ...
/r/MensRights31/01/12 12:42 AM
5

The problem is that women should get better pay for less work. They want equal pay, but men work harder, put in more sacrifice, transfer to unpleasant places (Alaska or oil rigs), do more dangerous work, work longer hours. But women want 50% of the CEO seats.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 10:30 PM
1

exactly. The first can be disproven, by using a notary public and witnesses. The second can never be disproven, except by uninterrupted video proof. Which is necessary anyway to prove she was not too drunk or too drugged
/r/MensRights30/01/12 09:31 PM
4

I keep repeating: a woman can change her mind at any time. So written consent is useless. Just claim you said "stop" and he did not stop. Get a lawyer before sex: 27 precautions before risking sex with a woman
/r/MensRights30/01/12 07:06 PM
1

Check the hilarious video here for your answer Get a lawyer before sex: 27 precautions before risking sex with a woman
/r/MensRights30/01/12 07:05 PM
2

Consent contract is not enough. A woman can change her mind at any time and say no. Google for "5 second rape", for example Get a lawyer before sex: 27 precautions before risking sex with a woman
/r/MensRights30/01/12 07:03 PM
3

it seems very consistent that 5-15% are blatantly false, with enough proof to charge the accuser. 25 to 70% smell fishy but not enough proof. Of course in these cases, police recommends legal proceedings against the male alleged perpetrator only. This is from the Bavaria study and other reports. This also probably explains the low 10% estimate mentioned by the Dutch. Probably the blatantly false accusations.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 07:00 PM
3

The sterile boyfriend invented the rape lie and forced her to report to police? This is what it sounds like. She is not responsible, the boyfriend is. Like John Wayne Bobbitt, whose philandering forced her to cut off his dick. /sarcasm She invented a rape lie towards her infertile boyfriend, to cover up her infidelity proven by pregnancy. Then she got caught up in her own lie and decided it is better to file rape charges with police then to admit her lie. This happens frequently. Lie to boyfrien…
/r/MensRights30/01/12 06:52 PM
3

3) don't encourage false rape accusations. A youth caught drinking illegally just needs to claim rape and all is forgiven. 4) did I already mention: due process, require hard PROOF, evidence, allow cross examination, don't disallow evidence that points towards motives for false rape accusations ........
/r/MensRights30/01/12 06:31 PM
3

A legitimate question for MR; what is the solution to false rape accusations? 1) Treat rape like any crime. Reinstitute due process. Require proof. Corroborating evidence. Don't arrest anyone upon mere accusations. Now in this case, with fake injuries, this is more serious. Now there are experts who wrote entire books about fake injuries. All this expertise has to be used. Google Jörg Kachelmann rape trial to find the articles at Human-Stupidity that mention such experts. 2) don't confuse real f…
/r/MensRights30/01/12 06:27 PM
2

you don't separate a fight by punching a person who only screams. there was no fight! He has stopped! he stopped after 1 slap and justifiably screamed at his aggressor! jerry springer's security does not act this way! they step in between and separate, providing security. they don't throw punches at a retreating person your interpretation is blatantly wrong!
/r/MensRights30/01/12 01:58 PM
1

sorry for the typos! I am using voice recognition on my android phone!
/r/MensRights30/01/12 01:29 PM
0

what is the guys attack criminal assault? bodily injury? A criminal case punishable by jail? documented on film! why what is only a civil case?
/r/MensRights30/01/12 01:28 PM
16

why is a man obliged to play Jesus and to turn the other cheek when a out of control woman slaps him? If a man slapped him and he slapped back, do you think anything would have happened? also I am not sure if he slapped harder. She slapped seriously, it was not playful.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 11:49 AM
8

thanks for that link. Further links are there.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 10:47 AM
6

please, do you have links? about the law suit. About the injuries he got, etc.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 10:44 AM
-2

It is interesting, the victim reacted whiny when beaten. Probably this was his salvation. Had he manned up and defended himself, fought back and exerted his legal right to self defense, he would probably have been beaten into a coma and suffered very severe injuries. It does not look like any person anywhere in the show cared about him.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 08:10 AM
12

Found the on girlwriteswhat's blog. This video here starts right before the slapping scene. For fairness' sake: If you watch the video from the beginning, it seems the woman's official role at the TV show is to be a bastard bitch. So maybe one would have to expect this behavior from her. Nevertheless there is no excuse that a large group of men attack the poor guy and absolutely nobody interferes to save him from punches and who knows what else he got.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 08:04 AM
1

to clarify things: I don't say what she did is right! I am just saying she did not commit rape in the sense you might think!
/r/MensRights23/01/12 10:45 AM
2

if you read the article you will find that there is no explanation what kind of "rape" she committed with the daughter. this is the typical mis-information! the article only mentions that she made the daughter watch sex movies. she might have done some fumbling, but that is not even mentioned. we all still have not learned the re-definition of rape, and therefore are imagining something else. read the comments in the article, you will see a discussion about the meaning of the words rape. I wish …
/r/MensRights23/01/12 10:43 AM
2

A) the number of votes are low. not enough people voting, too many downvote brigades! B) initially I thought you were complaining about lack of links on reddit men's rights the front page. I think there are too many self texts, and not enough links profound articles.
/r/MensRights23/01/12 10:30 AM
1

Finally we have a new and better reason for marital rape laws. While most married couples would be consenting to sex with their partners, they would not automatically consent to having another baby and the financial and labor hardship it entails.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 10:20 AM
1

I don't see anyone pressure to stop the under-reporting of female fraud and put her into jail for fraud and forgery of the husband's signature for her private interests. Well, everyone still values chivalry, so women always get away unpunished. Very interesting comment here A lot of wives just get the guy drunk Lots of wives don't resort to forging his signature, they get him drunk and so legally rape him (or rob him, make him pay for 20 years when he is not in the mental state to consent to eit…
/r/MensRights19/01/12 10:19 AM
6

Amen. Second that. Wonderful description. Roy (?) Baumeister asked why women don't create their own organisations instead of barging into those made by men and then demand changes. He said only one fortune 500 company was founded by a woman and taken by her to fortune 500 size. Women could start by forming a foreign legion or some other kind of militia for hire. Or their own voluntary fire brigades, especially in places where men haven't done so, yet.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 10:09 AM
1

Will the down-voters please identify? Knee jerk reaction to "The women are only raped"? Much worse then "the men are killed". The knee jerk reaction proves the point. Even the women in the war zone get it and they go and gather wood to keep their men alive. But the armchair feminists and mangina in their comfortable living room think otherwise And, by the way, men get raped there too. Systematic gang rapes over years. And are too ashamed to complain.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 09:34 AM
2

This is really serious. This happens in sexually liberated machism Brazil. One of the last bastions not totally taken over by feminists. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAplgxWMVZE&feature=related boring video of the happening http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R0Urg4K3VZs&feature=related TV about it (portuguese) The girl testified she had prior agreement, she was horny, she has no complaint. Now can anyone imagine if the girl were the average US feminist indoctrinated girl who felt horny but then wo…
/r/MensRights19/01/12 08:14 AM
2

It was dark night. Deep winter. The boat was tilted away from shore, and I heard that nobody told the passengers that they were right by the shore.
/r/MensRights17/01/12 08:17 AM
3

someone could petition on change.org . Unfortunately they are dominated by feminists, so not sure if there is any chance. You should sign the petition to get a men's rights section on change.org this petition has been on the cover of www.human-stupidity.com for half a year and is well on its way to get the 1000 votes required
/r/MensRights17/01/12 08:12 AM
3

half of the life boats were under water, the boat had tilted sideways Of course, why did they not use the life boats before the boat tilted too far?
/r/MensRights16/01/12 08:15 PM
11

"You were obsessed with sex and your life was in chaos," he said. "The psychologist report suggests the developing of some insight into your behaviour. "Given the Department of Child Safety is now involved, I'm satisfied you are a low risk of reoffending." This would never happen to a man: you have a little bit of insight in your behavior, and as child safety is watching your children they are not really in danger from you any more.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 08:12 PM
2

can't anyone just quote prestigious sources that disprove these numbers and, maybe bring up the more correct numbers? Here some quick results for masochism that clearly disprove the 100% quote http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sadomasochism It is usually agreed on by psychologists that experiences during early sexual development can have a profound effect on the character of sexuality later in life. Sadomasochistic desires, however, seem to form at a variety of ages. Some individuals report having ha…
/r/MensRights16/01/12 07:17 PM
6

Mother's baby, father's maybe. Maybe they aren't his?
/r/MensRights16/01/12 05:48 PM
1

Violent beatings are silly?
/r/MensRights16/01/12 05:29 PM
-1

There are huge lines of women wanting to fight in front lines. Even women in the armed forces are usually spared the most dangerous assignments. Furthermore, they can not perform on the same level as men. As long as they can not compete with men in fighting, weight lifting, not even in chess and snooker, they are probably not fit for front lines.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 03:20 PM
1

thanks for the info. We often disagree with you, but I never saw such totally idiotic comments coming from you.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 02:50 PM
2

how is that possible? you officially have custody and officially have to pay support for that kid? Or it was extortion, you had to agree to get custody?
/r/MensRights16/01/12 02:48 PM
-4

Male privilege does exist? People here would disagree. Female privilege exists! As Warren Farrell says: working longer hours in more dangerous jobs transferring to Alaska for higher pay is not a privilege. Having more men in the top echelon of IQ (men have a higher variance in IQ and almost all other traits) and of
/r/MensRights16/01/12 02:31 PM
0

Great comment. Women seem to be selfish everywhere. Child support, rape laws, medical research, special perks for women child and husband killers. Now selfishness even in sex? You found an interesting point
/r/MensRights16/01/12 12:35 PM
1

The expert is Warren Farrell. I would have to check if he speaks about assertiveness in asking for pay raise. Warren Farrel has the definite answers Warren Farrell says that. Women choose freedom from work, more leisure, more time with family, less stress at job, less danger at job. Better life instead of better pay. Maybe it is a wiser decision. But just don't complain if you yourself chose a more pleasurable life at lower pay, don't complain that others slaving away in long hour in dangerous c…
/r/MensRights13/01/12 07:00 PM
1

The expert is Warren Farrell. I would have to check if he speaks about assertiveness in asking for pay raise. Warren Farrel has the definite answers He takes apart most other arguments about the pay gap.
/r/MensRights13/01/12 06:58 PM
0

The manager can make another $8 million on his stock options by vastly increasing profit margins through women's lower wages. do you think he would get some private sympathy get into the way of his huge profits? Most likely the women do NOT perform equally for 72% of the wages. Again, Warren Farrel has figured it out in details. I watched his videos, read articles, Warren Farrell's web site and am reading the book. Women get MORE for the same work. Because of affirmative action, companies are de…
/r/MensRights13/01/12 06:41 PM
3

Warren Farrel has the definite answers
/r/MensRights12/01/12 08:27 PM
3

a) men's talents have a larger standard deviations. Therefore at the bottom and at the top of any talent, there are more men. b) men have more ambition, because the best successful alphas get all the women. c) men are the most failures. How come all homeless, all death row and most prisoners are men? Where are the quotas for death row? Warren Farrel has the definite answers
/r/MensRights12/01/12 08:27 PM
7

Her health insurance costs more then a man's. Statistically she is more likely to call in sick then a man. A man is more likely to work overtime or to accept unpleasant work hours. There is a major chance for her to quit, due to pregancy, once the University invested into her to get her more experienced and productive Add to that that women are much more likely to sue for discrimination and harrassment. In spite of all this, I don't believe that a University in the USA discriminates financially …
/r/MensRights12/01/12 08:22 PM
-1

You got it. This is the reason. To get the hot chicks to come into the bar so the men are happy. This is pro-men. So you don't have to pay them so many drinks. Now of course the guys who talk about this being discrimination, they are right. And it discriminates against men. But it is pro-men. I would not want to go to men's night, women pay double for the drinks. Not a single woman would be in the bar. Maybe what has to go is discrimination laws. Let people do what they want.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 08:06 PM
1

Make sure you don't get on a sex offender list before you ever become a lawyer. Adolescent sex laws and age of consent is a mine field. http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality/teenage-sexuality-the-immense-complexity-of-local-laws-state-lines-and-international-travel http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality/get-a-lawyer-before-courting-34-precautions-before-risking-sex-with-a-woman http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality/consult-a-lawyer-befor…
/r/MensRights12/01/12 07:29 PM
1

Women who cut off men's dicks get off easily. Lorena Bobbitt did not a day of jail. I would have to look up where women were, maybe arrested, but then acquitted after cold blooded murder of sleeping husbands or husbands of sisters. Look up battered women syndrome
/r/MensRights06/01/12 08:46 PM
1

nice girl. she still kept her sense of romanticism. I hope she makes you a sandwich in exchange. The average feminist feels entitled to you fixing her car, but is too liberated to make your sandwich. Keep traditional gender roles where it is to her advantage, and get liberated where it is to her advantage.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 05:24 AM
3

Damn. Celebrate that a woman was arrested for violence. A rare happening. They could have arrested the man for being the culprit. He must have abused her, or he was unfaithful which forced her to punch him. No woman would punch a man without being seriously provoked and thus acting in justified self defense. She did not even use a knife, or boiling water while he was asleep. Such behavior is considered acceptable. She actually only punched him while he was awake and conscious. They could have ar…
/r/MensRights03/01/12 05:15 AM
3

Is it not plausible that a woman that is physically and emotionally abused over the course of a long period of time would be considered mentally ill? It is easier for a woman to just pack and leave then to plan her husband's murder, or to lop off his dick. Classic self defense law applies only when there is no other way out, and to defend against an immediate threat. Also, since most politicians, judges, and cops are men, how is it that feminists are getting all their laws written and carried ou…
/r/MensRights03/01/12 05:10 AM
1

Just playing devil's advocate because everyone her always asks "what does this have to do with men's rights?". As much as penis slicing women have to do with women's rights. It probably is coincidence that the ranger he killed is female.
/r/MensRights02/01/12 04:28 PM
2

If the genders were inverted, feminists would protest the man-hunt after a victim of war trauma and spousal abuse. He would be considered temporarily insane in need of psychiatric evaluation. Suffering from battered or abused spouse syndrome. Most men would simply conclude that the guy is dangerous and would have support the woman's restraining order even before he proved dangours and criminal. To those that know family courts, there could be a truth to both versions. Restraining orders can be i…
/r/MensRights02/01/12 04:26 PM
31

My concern with this article comes from what’s missing—at least up until the very end. “I’m still chilled by the matter-of-fact explanation I received as to why it is women who collect firewood, even though they’re the ones who are raped,” says Kristof. “‘It’s simple,’ one woman here explained. ‘When the men go out, they’re killed. The women are only raped.’” Well, that new information changes things a bit, doesn’t it? So why then could this editorial not be titled “A Policy of Murder”? Why is a…
/r/MensRights02/01/12 11:09 AM
1

Isn't there freedom or expression in the US? That is, they check you out for terrorism (well, and for child porn), but you still are totally free to express whatever opinion? Please explain!
/r/MensRights02/01/12 11:07 AM
5

This is similar to http://bringseanhome.org/ The boy had been kidnapped by his mother, to Brazil. Later they argued that the boy had been accustomed to Brazil and thus should not return to his rightful father. Here they lied to the kid and maneuvered to keep dad away. Now it is traumatic if the boy finds out they lied to him all the time. Isn't father lucky he is not obliged to pay child support in addition to being barred to even tell his kid he is the father /s
/r/MensRights02/01/12 11:02 AM
2

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1032821/ watch the trailer
/r/MensRights01/01/12 11:21 AM
14

It was always he-said, she-said. This is the problem: for every PROVEN false rape accusation, normally where the false accuser was caught on camera, there are dozens of accusations where nobody had a camera or other solid proof. She went to his room and later claimed she was raped. Could be true because he was a violent jerk, but could be false accusation where she consented and was sorry after the fact. I will be downvoted and should not say that, but who would go to Mike Tyson's hotel room if …
/r/MensRights01/01/12 11:02 AM
1

it is easy to find evidence (or to allege) that the woman had a glass of wine and thus was unable to consent. The problem is the definition of rape. Of course, lack of due process aggravates the situation.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 12:46 AM
2

why is this getting downvoted? The 20% number is probably correct, it seems Military statistics reported by US military. So the only question is: why does this happen. Is there anything I left out? putting war hero young men in war situations, with women, is problematic. No other women around, no brothels, and soldiers are high testosterone guys. Defining sex with one drink as rape, is a serious problem. Basically 99% of consensual sex can be defined as rape this way. False rape accusations are …
/r/MensRights31/12/11 12:44 AM
1

This is a self fulfilling prophecy. Belief: Men are never victims Consequence: men are always arrested as perpetrators. Except, maybe when they were killed. Even then, it probably was self defense by the woman. Thus: men are always the culprits. The belief has proven true.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 12:15 AM
15

Isn't the police and justice system an accomplice of her crime? After all, the absurd arrest upon unfounded accusations with no corroborating evidence or with false self inflicted injury, that is what allows her to clean out the men's houses. If there were such a thing as due process, a man's property rights etc they would not leave a stranger in someone else's home to wreak havoc.
/r/MensRights30/12/11 11:59 PM
-5

One in 5 women will get sexually assaulted. That is due to hormone crazed macho young men no availability of women definition of consent under alcohol as "rape" false rape accusations The Navy averages 1.5 reported sexual assaults per day, with aggravated sexual assault accounting for the largest category of offenses reported. Female Sailors have a 20 percent chance of being sexually assaulted during their careers, and the younger they are, the greater the risk of sexual assault. Under UCMJ Arti…
/r/MensRights30/12/11 09:53 PM
0

you forgot the most important factor: affirmative action of artificially hiring and promoting women beyond their merit!
/r/MensRights29/12/11 11:28 AM
1

The genius of Warren Farrell: He focused on the recipes how women can make work choices like men and thus earn as much as men. Or rather, due to affirmative action, end up makeing more then men.
/r/MensRights29/12/11 12:39 AM
1

the old chivalry. Even career criminals protect women. Where is the rape culture? Not in prison. Only on Ivory Leage campuses.
/r/MensRights25/12/11 05:42 AM
1

That is amazing. Incredible. Can you explain what standards? They are both supposed to carry 220 lbs, to run 100 m in 13 seconds etc? Normally women get their lower standards even at Golf, Snooker, chess, .....
/r/MensRights25/12/11 05:40 AM
3

Thank you very much. I was already getting brainwashed to believe their logic. But, sadly you are heavily downvoted. Forcible transfer of a man's wealth is not a men's rights issue. It is logical, just, and to be expected. And the man agrees voluntarily, because he has no other choice or else it gets taken away by force.
/r/MensRights25/12/11 01:13 AM
3

a))))) at 2x it is getting downvoted into oblivion. Mel Gibson's Ex Wife Takes Half His Estimated $850 Million in Divorce Settlement - Robyn, his ex-wife of nearly 30 years and the mother of their seven children, is walking away with half his fortune, once estimated to be as high as $850 million (people.com) (+5/-10) submitted 4 hours ago by curious67 to TwoXChromosomes 3 comments b)))))) well, that is the problem. Why would the woman own jointly what he alone earned? c)) And yes, he will volunt…
/r/MensRights25/12/11 01:12 AM
-1

2x is downvoting it into oblivion. That should be reason enough to consider it a man's rights issue. Also, this is an issue to be discussed. You think she deserves a Million for every month she was with Mel Gibson? $ 30 000 per day? Way over $ 1000 per hour? Plus future earnings! Just discuss issues.
/r/MensRights24/12/11 08:51 PM
2

Mel Gibson will transfer half of his assets to his newly divorced wife in what may be the biggest Hollywood divorce payout in history. Mel’s divorce from ex-wife Robyn Gibson became official yesterday after a Los Angeles Superior Court judge signed off on their settlement. People magazine reports that Robyn will receive half of Mel’s estimated $850 million fortune as part of the divorce decree. Mel and Robyn married in 1980 and have seven children together. The couple did not sign a prenuptial a…
/r/MensRights24/12/11 08:38 PM
1

Here we have a truly underreported crime! WE need fio encourage the victims to come forward
/r/MensRights23/12/11 07:54 PM
1

There should be no sexism, no discrimination, to build only womens shelters. And no falsified statistics and feminist propaganda and violence against researchers!
/r/MensRights23/12/11 07:49 PM
1

Great article! Another example of feminism and political correctness falsifying science and distorting facts.
/r/MensRights23/12/11 05:24 PM
1

This is absolutely shocking. But actually seems to be the official belief of most authorities. Shocking, one-sided, unjust, sexist. I have no words
/r/MensRights15/12/11 12:49 AM
3

You could see it the other way around: women are inherently good, so if they do a heinous act, it MUST be because an evil man victimized them, drove them to despair and made them act in self defense. So women are not worth more, rather they women intrinsically good, from birth on, capable of no evil except when driven by an evil man, and certainly not responsible in case a man made them do evil acts.
/r/MensRights11/12/11 01:01 PM
3

Hope the false rape society will report on this blatant case. She was desperate by the inhumane attitude of her husband to force her to live where she did not want to live. This is an act of pure despair and perfectly understandable. She saw no other way to make sure things would go HER way /sarcasm
/r/MensRights11/12/11 12:58 PM
1

I just posted this to see comments, with no special intent. But now that men's rights downvoted this, I thought it over: If that would happen to a woman, Hillary Clinton herself would lead the protests against this inhumane behavior. All women's magazines would protest. They would doubt if he really did the rape. They would say nothing justifies thousands of lashes that will severely scar him.
/r/MensRights11/12/11 12:44 PM
2

Great comment! Please find sources and cite!
/r/MensRights10/12/11 01:29 PM
1

No, it's worse. Male teachers don't get hired in elementary schools. See Warren farrell.
/r/MensRights10/12/11 12:01 AM
-2

He had sex with a very young women (12 years?) and the girl took some booze and drugs before that. So not exactly rape rape, but by today's standards very far off. By the standards of the 70ies, most rock stars, athletes and movie stars did similar things. I remember, I saw the 12 year old victim's nude photos in major magazines at that time. By today's standard child porn. I am not defending his actions. I object to confusing things with the term "rape", misleading people that he held down a sc…
/r/MensRights08/12/11 03:03 PM
-1

In Germany it is illegal, and in Britain a crime punishable by jail to test your kid. Is that source enough? http://www.overcomingbias.com/2006/12/the_conspiracy_.html http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/mens-rights-feminism/mothers-baby-fathers-maybe-mandatory-dna-testing-at-birth http://www.hta.gov.uk/licensingandinspections/consentanddnafaqs.cfm
/r/MensRights05/12/11 06:48 PM
8

If it were in the woman's interest, they would immediately quote that it is in the health interest of the child to know the health history of the father. This is very important for medical treatment. So there are plenty of reasons to make it mandatory, just as many other health tests and vaccinations. The child has the right not to get wrong diagnoses for giving the wrong family health history to physicians.
/r/MensRights05/12/11 06:42 PM
3

See the graphics in the article. If you click on the graphics you see detailed statistics about all countries' retirement ages. Lots of countries let women retire earlier then men. No reason can be found for this. Now consider that women, in general, take a few years off work and live a few years longer. There is ample reason to argue that women should retire a few years later. Nobody dares to argue that women should contribute the same number of years and receive the same number of years of ret…
/r/MensRights05/12/11 09:58 AM
3

can the down-voters please explain why they would downvote this? Feminists? disagree with what in the article?
/r/MensRights05/12/11 05:47 AM
2

here you get some answers. It is ok for women to kill men. It is not ok for men to even deflect a woman's punch to his face http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/mws7p/kim_kardashian_punches_kris_humphries_domestic/ Feel free to contact me for more questions or material. Man cut off wife's breast and super-glued her vagina. http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/mens-rights-feminism/lorena-bobbit-forgives-her-husband
/r/MensRights02/12/11 05:57 AM
0

it is permissible for women to kill men. In all other cases, one is supposed to use the minimum force to defend against imminent violence. And that is to get the hell out and away, so one gets out of danger. Now if the violent partner pursues you to your new residence, and attacks you tere, then you are acting in self defense. If a man gets slapped by a bully every day, on the street, and then knives him in the back when the bully is leaving, he will get convicted. If his victim gets a knife and…
/r/MensRights02/12/11 05:52 AM
5

absolutely right. Totally absurd. He probably caused her anguish and distress because she felt frustrated he did not take a wound up strong punch in the face. So he caused her anguish and deserves to be punished. /sarcasm He did a great defense against a punch, without any violence. In an attack like this, normal laws of self defense would allow a counter-punch in the face. Well, if the attacker were a man ......
/r/MensRights02/12/11 05:44 AM
2

retirement benefits. Women work less years, thus contribute less live longer, thus enjoy longer retirement and often retire younger So they get more benefits for less contributions. http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/mens-rights-feminism/against-feminist-entitlement-bias-gender-equality-requires-women-to-retire-older-then-men-to-have-equal-duration-of-retirement-and-years-worked
/r/MensRights26/11/11 10:45 PM
0

anylawyer here? why is there never accountability for child support anywhere in the world?
/r/MensRights25/11/11 01:32 PM
1

serious? I thought the opposite. It should be very easy to get a restraining order against a person who has no business to get near you. It should be hard to get a restraining order that gets the other person removed from her home or work place. I am shocked!
/r/MensRights23/11/11 04:11 PM
4

Girl walks up to a boy and kisses him. No details as to what type of kiss. I was worried they would charge the boy with battery, after all girls are never to blame. I wonder what would happen if the boy actually complained about unwanted kissing. I am sure if the girl complained about unwanted kissing, all hell would break loose. I wonder if police really should be called on every kiss by 12 year olds. We urgently would have to conscript 90% of the adult population into the police force
/r/MensRights23/11/11 10:47 AM
2

I would get a video recording, or even better, a hand-written dated and signed letter from her, stating her preferences, that she allows certain bruising, and that to rescind permission she would get a written receipt from you. And state the safe word. And of course, that she did all this voluntarily, and was given a cool off period after writing this. Then keep a few copies of that letter in safe places. Of course, best would be to ask a lawyer familiar with local laws.
/r/MensRights19/11/11 10:05 AM
6

Better version Full film: Child Abuse - http://youtu.be/biLsTmmmZYs
/r/MensRights15/11/11 12:09 PM
1

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/8091968/Germany-moves-to-ban-forced-marriages.html special rights are creeping in here
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:56 AM
4

The numbers are not inflated. in 2008, 3400 women and girls sought government counseling. So it is fair to say that there must be many times more such cases. This is a serious issue, and MRA certainly are supportive of the woman victims. But: forced shotgun weddings for boys are not mentioned. And special laws to punish forced marriages could be abused as another feminist weapon to accuse men, 30 years after the wedding, that the marriage was forced.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 11:38 AM
2

this was meant as sarcasm, in case you have doubts!
/r/MensRights05/11/11 08:28 PM
2

there would be no problem with a woman impregnating herself, as long as she would take the full financial responsibility.
/r/MensRights05/11/11 08:26 PM
19

women are never responsible for their acts! as long as women get child support, even if they rape or steal the sperm! she is justified because her biological clock is running, and the man should be sensitive enough to understand that!
/r/MensRights05/11/11 08:19 PM
5

who is down-voting this? You don't like the facts? you think backstabbing is ok? Please voice your opinions. Read the article first.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 08:41 PM
17

http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/10/04/christie-blatchford-death-in-the-name-of-love/ Actually, in this article they cite he has been convicted of battery several times, and the woman always came back to him in and after jail. The relationship just was sick. Still, a history of battery does not give justification for fearing a non-existant gun and carrying a 12 inch knife, just in case. Why did she have the eknife? should not have entered the car! Important missing info is here: http://news.nat…
/r/MensRights26/10/11 07:19 PM
6

why does nobody even try to explain what happened in the court room. What the jury has known, what we don't know. Very strange.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 07:08 PM
14

Goldkind is the killer's lawyer. Her lawyer says he was not a model citizen. That is all the proof of his abuse they have? And so what, if he always beat her. He never used a weapon. What reason is there to envision a non-existent gun he never used before? This all is weird. And the jury knows something we don't know? Well, why does not someone tell us?
/r/MensRights26/10/11 07:04 PM
3

The real culprit is the judge who refused the restraining order. Or the system. After all whe have a violence against women act. There is nothing illegal about violence against men. /rant Everyone knows that women are victims and never violent. So of course, there is no need for a restraining order against a woman. If, rarely, a woman is violent, then it is his fault. I wonder what he had done to her. He must have beaten her regularly when they lived together 2 years ago. OK. serious: There is n…
/r/MensRights26/10/11 07:00 PM
-2

Don't forget a council on transgendered, transvestites They are more important then men /sarcasm
/r/MensRights26/10/11 06:40 PM
1

In 2006, Hendricks shot Doyle "Brian" Teague dead, telling police he had entered her home uninvited and threatened someone. Police determined she had acted in self-defense. She probably got away the first time, due to pussy pass. Then she thought she would continue getting away murdering. Her husband probably beat her and she snapped. A woman would never do such an act unprovoked. Or maybe her husband did not give her enough money, and thus she needed the insurance money.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 06:30 PM
-6

is there any clear proof that he has been found guilty by a jury of having beaten her for years, or even once? Or at least clear evidence by statement of half a dozen people who are unrelated to the assassin?
/r/MensRights26/10/11 06:23 PM
-5

self defense is if you have no way out. After being sent to the hospital a few times, why don't you just move out of the way of the perpetrator. Maybe get a restraining order. A man does not get away with stabbing a bully in the back one second after he stopped beating him seriously and walks away. And a woman gets away killing 5 days after the last beating, with nothing preventing her from just leaving?
/r/MensRights26/10/11 06:22 PM
1

this is a very different issue, but in case the abuse (sexual our violent) has been committed by mother or father, then it also could be genetically passed to the children. This will always be ignored, as hereditary character traits are not politically correct.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 08:38 AM
8

But a consultant psychologist had earlier testified that O'Donnell sought out attention because she had low self-esteem. She had also used drugs from the age of 14, had below-average intelligence and had suffered from narcissistic and dysfunctional parenting and severe depression. A low self esteem zeta male certainly would escape jail for boinking girls /sarcasm O'Donnell was also given an 18-month community-based order - despite breaching an earlier order for armed robbery. She is a career cri…
/r/MensRights26/10/11 06:37 AM
13

has any lawyer used these female cases as defense in case of accused men? With how much success? or why not?
/r/MensRights26/10/11 06:15 AM
-1

How many cancer deaths? 7000? a life is counted as worth at least a million. So this is 7 Billion. That pays for $350 (3 doses) in 20 million men per year or 200 million in 10 years. Not sure if my numbers are right, but they look good. Now, if the side effect claims of thingsarebad are true, then the calculations are different. Don't forget, this also reduces HPV in women, who can not get it from vaccinated men. Male death reduction is not so important, but reducing HPV in women is a greater go…
/r/MensRights25/10/11 10:49 PM
4

Grinnell doesn’t have any current varsity athletes who have identified themselves as transgender, but assistant athletic director Heather Benning said that with the school’s embrace of diversity, it was important to be a leader. The NCAA recently issued a “best practices” memo which includes providing gender-neutral locker rooms. This will be fun when a lone woman athlete will share the gender neutral showers with the football or basketball team. These guys will be expelled for merely looking. I…
/r/MensRights24/10/11 05:35 AM
1

The false rape society mentioned that this is a recipe for desaster. For true rape, even. Or for constant cajoling, pleading for sex. And of course this is a disaster in waiting for domestic violence, true or invented. And if he ever looks at the woman, then it would be peer harassment. If the laws were not as they were, then this could even be considered progressive and liberal. The way they are, it is a mine field for men. Because abuse and rape jurisdictions are NOT gender neutral.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 05:26 AM
-1

You don't get it. These women are empowered. And the men should men up and stop being afraid. It is a good lesson for them, anyway. So they understand what is being done to women.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 05:19 AM
3

Can you imagine men's possession of child pornography being excused because he is a lonely loser that can not get laid and had traumatic experiences when trying to hook up with women? Men get jailed even for accidental possession of CP. Note that some women actually PRODUCED cp with their children. The court noted that the man appeared to be seeking out women that had been "struck by tragedies within the family, or had been generally mentally worn out." "Even though they (the women) ... obviousl…
/r/MensRights19/10/11 05:42 AM
3

right. And the one man with breast cancer first was denied treatment because that treatment was reserved for women. Only after a world wide outcry did they allow the man to be treated for free like any woman could
/r/MensRights16/10/11 09:56 PM
2

Don't men get nuked for 1 or 2 phone calls, a few emails, or simple non-violent presence at a woman's residence? It took 1000 phone calls, breaking glass with swords and tire irons to finally arrest the woman!?
/r/MensRights16/10/11 09:52 PM
0

Shocking the collection of presidents, ministers, world champions etc that were brought down by female accusations, most of them disproven or lacking evidence.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 05:02 AM
1

Sorry for your friend.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 04:51 AM
2

Did you read the story of Ganarlow Wilson? Or Moshe Katsav? Would have been much better had they pled guilty
/r/MensRights13/10/11 04:49 AM
-1

stupid example. If someone agrees to have sex blindfolded, then they waived their right to check for their partner's looks and colors. If someone agrees to have sex with an obvious woman, that does not mean he agreed to have sex with a trans, nor with a gorilla disguised as a woman with a clever costume and artificial skin. If someone has sex at a glory hole (a hole in the wall where there is a mouth, or a vagina on the other side), he did not agree that you put a sheep or a dog on the other sid…
/r/MensRights12/10/11 10:27 PM
7

why can't you pick sex partners that WANT to be with you after knowing the truth? Why do you try to get partners based on deceit, or omission? And you blame them that they should be with you and not have fully informed consent? It is like you have AIDS, but the guy did not ask. Or you are a transvestite, don't have sex, you just make out. How does the guy know that the "woman" has a penis, if he only kisses. Why does it matter?
/r/MensRights12/10/11 10:21 PM
0

Right. If a man says he is an Israeli, but he is an Arab, he can be considered a rapist. If a man pretends he is a woman, and deceives a Lesbian, believe me, all hell breaks lose and he will be put in jail for sexual assault. Invalid consent because she thought it was a woman. If a man pretends to be his brother, or his twin brother. He says nothing, and has sex with the brother's wife. It is considered rape. He did not lie. But by default she can assume that if he comes on like her husband, loo…
/r/MensRights12/10/11 09:39 PM
29

Committing to fatherhood is one-sided unfair expensive ruinous court enforced only for fathers, even if mother's don't keep their part of the deal
/r/MensRights12/10/11 07:24 PM
0

nowadays promiscuity is only wrong for men. In the case of women, it is sexual liberation. Believing in a woman's word about birth control is unwise. Even if she gave a notarized declaration that she religiously will take birth control, and will take full responsibility for the consequences, it will be void.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 06:36 PM
1

well, he can not be their emotional father, without the mother making him her ATM and bilk him for everything he has, and having him jailed for non-payment.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 06:33 PM
4

your comment disappears off the radar Your interesting article disappears from the front page, or never makes it there. Some people post in the hope that other people actually read their posts, or the articles the reference. So yes, I care if my posts and comments get voted out of people's sight.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 04:40 AM
1

I thought they needed contempt of court excuse to put men into debtor's prison.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 04:37 AM
0

he deserved it. She claims he had abused her first. She is a victim.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 04:31 AM
1

"Reclaim the night" money-slut walk in gang area @2am. We don't deserve to be told to leave our cash and Rolex at home to avoid being victimized.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 04:20 AM
2

Women always hide behind "best interest of the child". Seems there is no empowered woman in this world that earns enough money to feed a child on her own. Except poor inner city women whose deadbeat boy friend is already in jail, or is jobless and makes no income. But well off rich women somehow need a man's money in the best interest of the child.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 04:13 AM
3

The strict liability is being ABUSED against men. If you were going 50 and can PROVE, you filmed the scene and there is a sign (maximum speed 75mph), I doubt anyone would get convicted. But if a woman has a government ID "21" years, and the guy photocopied it, he gets arrested.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 04:05 AM
3

Victim dupes man into raping her. How can you rape without knowing you are raping?
/r/MensRights03/10/11 04:03 AM
5

Get a lawyer before sex: 27 precautions before risking sex with a woman Basically, you have to hire a detective to do a background check on the girl. Get her birth records, photos of her high school graduation, interview relatives, etc. The other option is: don't have sex (or any indecent act) with anyone that looks under 35.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 03:59 AM
4

It is much worse. Men are at risk, even if they check the ID, and even if the ID has been falsified by government itself. Government-emitted ID proves she is 20. Men could not know she is 15, but will go to prison for underage sex, child porn
/r/MensRights03/10/11 03:54 AM
5

So are women held to the same standards as men, to be hired as fire fighters? I doubt it. Do they only hirer top athlete women to be fire fighters? And once their athletic performance wanes, will they be fired?
/r/MensRights03/10/11 03:39 AM
3

careful. You are admitting a crime. Reception of child pornography. You victimized the poor girl. Watching child porn victimizes the child! http://human-stupidity.com/irrationality/stupid-dogma/child-porn-witch-hunt Basically, thousands of men can go to jail for a decade or two. It is enough that they have the movie in their recycling bin, or some rest that has not been deleted yet. Or a server protocol shows it has been downloaded by them. All this is to protect the minor. She is a victim.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 03:32 AM
3

I don't see where it says that he was arrested. Can you please quote where it says that? It says, without proof, that he attacked her first. She must be a great fighter if she manages to get a man semi-conscious after he attacked her first.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 03:11 AM
6

"It was just an egg" So I am not a mother, I am not responsible. Men don't get away with that "It was just a sperm".
/r/MensRights29/09/11 10:08 AM
-6

I will be down-voted for mentioning an even bigger taboo: anyone checked the violence by race and income? Yes, it is all statistics. Tiger Woods was roughed up by blonde rich Erin. But I bet that domestic violence is much bigger among blacks.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 09:26 AM
2

Now check this. The New York Times is not an antifeminist paper. But they are pretty clear. But you know feminist arguments: the fact that you have proven innocence in rapes (by DNA), does not mean you did not do the third rape (where your proof of innocence is strong but less so) Of course, all this gets us back to the problem of witness errors. People make mistakes in identifying criminals.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 08:04 AM
1

No spermicide is needed. If you wash out the condom and the sperm goes down the drain, that is sufficient. Or if you flush the entire condom down the toilet. You can always put a knot in the condom and take it home. Always watch if the condom packet has air pressure in it. Or else the woman might have poked a needle hole through the package and the condom.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 07:42 AM
0

I think he should get the chance to walk away. But walk means walk - no rights, no access, no contact. No "I still love you, but because your mom cheated on me 8 years ago, I don't have any obligation to take of you anymore. We're friends, but I don't have to help pay for your braces." That's just child abuse. That is mother's wallet abuse. And "true father's wallet abuse". The child does not watch mother's and father's bank account. The child, especially if under 6 years, does not care if fathe…
/r/MensRights26/09/11 07:37 AM
1

I might get downvoted. But 95% (?) or 100 % of violent hooligans are male (any numbers?) Proof: there was no violence among the women Of course, after a few months with no males, do you think women will start rioting? Of course, there are other issues where men and women are different too. Success in competitive environment. Etc. So accepting differences in favor of women means also accepting differences in favor of men.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 02:12 PM
0

agree. Now where are all the downvoters coming from? is there a downvote brigade for Human-Stupidity? Every commenter here agrees. Being over 16 and actually married no sane MRA can be against this. Please comment
/r/MensRights25/09/11 02:01 PM
-3

I wonder if he only convicted boys. If he had falsely convicted a single girl, there would be much more outrage, especially by feminists. Anyone has the stats?
/r/MensRights25/09/11 01:23 PM
1

she looks older, but they show her birth certificate, her participation in Miss Teen contests, etc. Nobody would have found out by now and proven it? They have her family contacts, everything.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 01:21 PM
3

you say that women under 25 should not marry? makes some sense , on the other hand contradicts evolutionary past where everyone married really early Maybe decent women and decent men marrying early could solve the lack of children problem
/r/MensRights25/09/11 01:20 PM
1

do you want to elaborate? I have an idea but no clear vision how to argue this.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 01:16 PM
1

one might even doubt the wisdom of 13 year old marriages. But sure better then out of wedlock pregnancies of 13 year olds. And lots of adult marriages are unwise too. One could even do a psychological evaluation if the kids get too young, to avoid abuse .....
/r/MensRights25/09/11 12:14 PM
1

what a rare true article debunking feminist BS. I already bought a dentist for the disgusting work of cleaning my dirty teeth. How would anyone mess in other people's stinking mouth if it were not for money and poverty. Feminist arguments against prostitution debunked
/r/MensRights25/09/11 11:55 AM
4

Evolutionary psychologist Robert Kurzban explains the human propensity to meddle in other people’s private lives, to outlaw victimless sex "crimes" FIRST comes an inner moral feeling (which usually serves to increase one’s own reproductive fitness). THEN, after the fact,we find some logical reasoning to justify our moral feelings. We invent victims even if there are none Kurzban explains how, in a small community, everyone gains reproductive advantage by restricting other people’s sexual liberty…
/r/MensRights25/09/11 11:32 AM
2

I really dislike these cryptic posts, though some of them make it to first place. I believe a title should clearly state what the post is all about, so we can see if we are interested. Although there was no suggestion of any sexual motive, he was dismissed from the school where he had worked for eight years. And there is the problem. That, right there. Thanks to the campaigning of a ragbag of deranged feminists and femiservatives, we now make the assumption of some kind of sexual motive for any …
/r/MensRights25/09/11 10:59 AM
1

why is this odd? If it were admissible, it would discourage false or true rape victims from coming forward. If you did 5 false rape accusations, that does not mean that the 6th time you could not be truly raped /sarcasm
/r/MensRights21/09/11 06:20 AM
3

you mean: Female privilege has to continue for a few more years? Against feminist entitlement bias: Gender equality requires women to retire older then men to have equal duration of retirement and years worked
/r/MensRights21/09/11 05:56 AM
7

It is amazing how women want special privileges. The truth is, women should retire later. They work less years, and live longer years at the end. There should be true financial equality, which is, whatever women pay into the system they should get out of it. Which leads to this: Against feminist entitlement bias: Gender equality requires women to retire older then men to have equal duration of retirement and years worked
/r/MensRights21/09/11 05:54 AM
2

This fixed some shortcomings of this reddit post http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/kkm3t/a_much_more_accurate_rape_analogy/ And added some more original content to it. I hope that this will put an end to the under-reporting of mugging. After all, one in four women will get mugged in college. And all muggings are the same, be they forcible or voluntary donations of money or items by a drunk women.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 02:16 PM
1

You have a point here. Human-Stupidity just came out with a modified version of this http://human-stupidity.com/humor/if-mugging-laws-were-like-rape-laws
/r/MensRights20/09/11 02:02 PM
1

There is no argument that real forcible rape-rape is a crime, and should be punished, when proven beyond reasonable doubt, with due process. This is a given, not contested, everyone agrees. So no need to discuss this. Same about true proven kidnapping, etc.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 11:13 AM
1

1) this r/mensrights is about the insanity, that basic laws of self defense are voided against women. This is sad and I consider this a clear violation of human rights. What do the lawyers say? Men don't have human rights when facing women? 2) still, a boxer has reflexes. it is almost impossible to hit him with a punch or an object. 3) anyone can tell what to do if attacked by a woman? turn on a recorder and then do the necessary self defense?
/r/MensRights20/09/11 12:24 AM
5

I think she should be admonished severely and get a slap on the wrist. Of course, I think the same should happen for men who overstep boundaries. All this behavior is obnoxious and disturbing, but lots of men and women have suffered such disturbances and gotten over it. Feminist laws have blown all such nuisance disturbances out of proportion.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 02:01 PM
8

dogs have more rights then humans. They also have the right to a humane death. Terminally ill humans have to suffer till the very end. ACTIVE euthanasia is almost never allowed. Passive Euthanasia, stopping to feed, starving to death is not a friendly death either.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 01:54 PM
0

Fatherless girls could be reformed by father figures. Though it is kind of late. A good older man as boyfriend could help. A decent good man. She seems to be searching older man, not sure how good character they have. Of course, the law being as it is, older men with character will avoid her at all cost. Even if they don't have sex, it is too dangerous to be accused of sex, by her, or by relatives, police, .... The only problem is that that man will be jailed due to problematic laws. Yes, I unde…
/r/MensRights15/09/11 01:35 PM
1

prison for sex, lying, and being manipulative?
/r/MensRights15/09/11 01:32 PM
1

Actually, it seems she is just manipulative. I don't see any criminal behavior except hyper-sexuality which in itself is not a problem (if she did not get herself pregnant). But the LAW makes it a problem. So she is a horny precocious teen. She probably can not have sex with anyone without getting him into jail. Depending where she is (California for example). That is a problem created by laws that I object to. So her non-criminal behavior jails men as collateral damage.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 01:31 PM
2

http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality/get-a-lawyer-before-courting-34-precautions-before-risking-sex-with-a-woman
/r/MensRights15/09/11 01:27 PM
6

DV laws allow to kick out men from their own house. Even if the house is theirs and the woman is from a 6 month long affair. DV laws are always in favor of women (Violence against WOMEN Act). DV laws negate a man's right to self defense, if attacked by a woman. DV laws order the man to be arrested, (almost) always Did I answer your question?
/r/MensRights31/08/11 10:43 PM
2

The court has directed us to keep her location confidential, or anything that might lead to the discovery of her location. So for that reason, we are not going to release the probation officer's name, where she is reporting to ......... *Her information is not going to be entered in our database. *
/r/MensRights26/08/11 06:55 PM
-11

seriously. You can not talk to a minor? Even if the minor flirts with you? There used to be an age of consent for sex. Then for touching. Then for grooming. Now it is for talking in a public bar without touching? This world is getting more and more dangerous. Get a lawyer before courting: 34 precautions before risking sex with a woman From the link: We mistakenly thought that a mere 27 precautions checklist would suffice before engaging in sex. We stand corrected. Get a lawyer before courting Me…
/r/MensRights26/08/11 06:08 PM
52

it is worse for men, because they must pay and have absolutely no way to opt out. Women have abortion, adoption, etc. Women also don't get jailed for non-payment of child support.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 03:18 PM
1

just that your wife or girlfriend has not accused you of rape does not mean that you did not rape her last week. These arguments are pretty far fetched. Wild accusations and innuendo, we can accuse anyone. There is no proof that Hillary Clinton is not raping her husband. How far will we get with this?
/r/MensRights24/08/11 04:55 AM
-2

it says that those being "bothered" by false accusations are around 50%. This is also an attempt to use feminist tactics. They keep repeating that one in four gets raped in college, and that hundreds of thousands get trafficed to football games. So this is just a few provocative numbers, ....... It is hard to be clear, concise, short and hedge all your words in very careful ways. Just try to get the gist of it .....
/r/MensRights24/08/11 04:50 AM
-1

yes, it is sexual assault and rape. Did you check how much each of the two contributes, percent-wise? But these are pretty similar anyway ........... It gets hard to write headlines that include all the nuances.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 04:47 AM
-6

What makes you think that women in Bavaria are especially prone to false rape accusations? Much more then elsewhere? Did you read that this replicates result from another German state? And the Austrian police chief says the same? Are you aware that research from other countries, linked in the article, also point to similar numbers? Certainly not to 2% as cited by feminists. This article should make people: a) want to translate the research article b) replicate similar research elsewhere. The mai…
/r/MensRights24/08/11 01:55 AM
-1

Let us remember the thousands of men that are less lucky then Dominique Strauss-Kahn. For every Strauss-Kahn, there are dozens of men that don’t escape unjust persecution One in two rape accusations are false. Like Strauss-Kahn, thousands of men are presumed guilty, jailed and smeared without due process. They can not afford to spend millions of dollars for bail, a dream team of lawyers, detectives, and their own guards for domestic prison as Dominique Strauss-Kahn did. We only hear of the few l…
/r/MensRights23/08/11 10:19 PM
1

People who want to riot find a reason. It can be a rumor, an imaginary injustice. It can be the fact that others have great cars and you don't. Or that they arrested a criminal friend of yours. Anything.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 09:03 PM
2

(http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-14459127)[How could police stop riots?] (BBC) British police is shy to even use water cannons and rubber bullets
/r/MensRights09/08/11 06:16 PM
0

Is this a mensrights issue? a) a man has to protect himself and family, his future and property, his living environment b) the male youth NEET's are failed men, and time bombs to explode. Men should find solutions for their fellow men. (or help to avoid that things get to the point they got)
/r/MensRights09/08/11 05:59 PM
0

Political correctness and humanitarianism and human rights were invented by civilized intelligent academics. They might work for civilized intelligent populations. These good intentions have been maligned for giving more protection to felons then to their innocent law abiding victims. Applying these rules to uncontrollable criminally minded looters and hooligans has terrible effects: good citizen’s physical integrity, lives, health, financial integrity get destroyed by such criminals. Killing a …
/r/MensRights09/08/11 05:32 PM
9

Basically, young Muslim girls in Germany that assume German habits of dating, dancing, dressing and behavior, who date a non-Muslim, dishonor the family. Then a member of the family has to kill her to restore the honor of the family. The Study shows that 1/3 of the victims are male. Seems these male victims are never emphasized or not even mentioned.
/r/MensRights05/08/11 07:52 PM
1

right!! Here mere accusations would be enough, no further proof needed
/r/MensRights02/08/11 03:49 AM
1

The problem is that a minor can not agree to long term mortgages and car installments either. That is much less money then 18 years of child support
/r/MensRights02/08/11 03:48 AM
1

In rape accusations, men are guilty until proven innocent. If there is DNA evidence, even more so. It is not clear if he ever had a DNA test or if the kid could be someone else's.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 03:45 AM
0

If it were normal law practice, this is hearsay. I can tell everyone I robbed the bank, this is not enough to convict. Now, in pussy pass rape process, men get convicted just on a woman's word. The policeman who did not pursue the rape accusations would be fired or sued. I wonder if he ever did a DNA test if the baby was not fathered by the other guy. It looks like the woman wanted to get pregnant at any cost by anyone.
/r/MensRights02/08/11 03:43 AM
2

Aren't minors incapable of assuming long term financial commitments? Aren't there any other legal rules that criminal's should not be paid by their victims? Even more so, because she can perfectly spend the child support money for her own shopping needs.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 11:37 PM
-1

This list continues, but I'll move on. Please continue. This list is amazing. Very well done. Should be posted to 2X for commenting. How can anyone read this list and still speak of men as the privileged class?
/r/MensRights30/07/11 10:35 PM
-1

Haven't heard of a single case where a man accused a woman of rape, only on his word with no proof, and he was protected by anonymity.
/r/MensRights30/07/11 10:32 PM
1

great comment. Good luck with your submission.
/r/MensRights30/07/11 10:23 PM
2

There is the entire issue of sexual rights for children and adolescents. Playing doctor without getting handcuffed and arrested. Right to sexual experimentation without government interference. Parents still can interfere (without resorting to lynching or other methods, of course) r/YouthRights? Differentiating rights for adolescents. Right to have sex without government interference (but government HELP in providing birth control information etc). Again, parents probably can interfere, ...... N…
/r/MensRights30/07/11 10:22 PM
1

There has been a kids rights movement so that 3rd world kids can do reasonable amount of paid work to pay their school pencils and books, to help in family farming and other family business (instead of being forced to play while the family is starving). r/YouthRights? A good point is differentiating Youth from child, which has been confounded by feminist http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality/united-nation-manipulates-child-definition-to-persecute-men-17-year-old-children
/r/MensRights30/07/11 10:12 PM
2

Kids rights, if run by feminists, means hiding women's interests behind alleged kids rights (it is in the best interest not to do DNA tests, to force cuckold dad to keep on paying), to force dad to pay $ 50 k per month so mom can dedicate herself to the kids (and shopping)
/r/MensRights30/07/11 10:04 PM
1

Such a hypothesis is impossible to prove short of raising kids in a glass jar and the measuring their IQ once they reach adult hood. There's no way to separate environment and genetics in human studies. Study science. Nobel prizes were won by studying identical or dizygotic twins reared apart. Studying identical twins in different environments. Perfect separation. There are other, easier, but less efficient ways how to separate genetics and environment. Adoption in general. Also what would it pr…
/r/MensRights30/07/11 01:05 PM
2

you can have sex with a 16 year old in Europe, but you can not photograph her http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality/mandatory-15-years-jail-for-photos-of-legal-girl-friend-you-can-have-sex-with-them-just-dont-photograph-them
/r/MensRights30/07/11 12:58 PM
7

This is porn for women. It gives women unrealistic images of males. Add to that romance novels of rich handsome guys being conquered by heroines and becoming faithful husbands. Feminists already removed Playboy pics, even bikini pics of men's wives from car shops, repair stations, workplace, etc. Now, for equality's sake, the female porn has to be removed, too Or, alternatively, all the restrictive laws on male entertainments should be scrapped.
/r/MensRights30/07/11 12:40 PM
1

And this does not even take in consideration, that, maybe, the females could be less qualified. The research paper by Bickel, et al.[14] concluded that women tended to apply to competitive departments with low rates of admission even among qualified applicants (such as in the English Department), whereas men tended to apply to less-competitive departments with high rates of admission among the qualified applicants (such as in engineering and chemistry). Also interesting that the Mickey Mouse stu…
/r/MensRights29/07/11 09:42 PM
3

there was a case of girls flashing their tits on a public roadway. A guy took a photo with his cell phone and was arrested for production and possession of child porn. I think it happened in Florida. Never take a photo on a public street without checking ID first
/r/MensRights29/07/11 02:37 PM
3

and if someone takes a photo of a topless woman, without proof of age, and she is potentially 17 years old, the photographer is in the slammer for child porn. Why does this not happen with a photo of a topless guy? There is not equality, and feminists will not support such equality!! It is all false!!
/r/MensRights29/07/11 04:10 AM
2

That sure is part of the reason. Nobody denies that hostile environment impedes intellectual growth But how come Blacks create no Confucian ethics and Asians don't tend to create black anti-intellectual culture? Walter E. Williams: How much can discrimination explain? See my other long replies in this thread. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/j1dsx/why_are_so_few_young_men_of_color_graduating_high/c28fr9c Read also the articles on black superiority in running http://human-stupidity.com…
/r/MensRights28/07/11 08:55 AM
2

Finally, because of all the bullshit associated with poverty, our unique history with blacks (i.e. they used to be fucking slaves), and our celebration of "whiteness", "black" has become a pretty negative connotation. Not only will that impede finding work (i.e. employers assuming a black employee will do bad shit), but it will also foster a negative self-image which can do way more damage than poverty alone. I mean, fuck, watch this video. That sort of thing doesn't happen in a vacuum. Kids don…
/r/MensRights28/07/11 08:53 AM
-2

Unsubstantiated? Rushton keeps publishing, replying to all challenges. The last publications were replies to Flynn and Nisbett. Shockingly he should Nisbett selectively fudging study results in order to support his points. We show dozens of hours of video discussions, with Rushton, Graves, Nisbett, Flynn, Lynn, ........... Culture, diet, all this is discussed and analyzed. Every single counter-argument is analyzed by Rushton and disproven. Every single one, it is amazing. Nobel Prize winner Bouc…
/r/MensRights28/07/11 08:31 AM
2

and finally women get retirement pension for 8 years longer then men, even though they paid into the retirement fund (work less years)
/r/MensRights28/07/11 05:10 AM
-2

I know I will be down-voted for this. Nobel prize winners have been shunned for saying such things. But maybe someone is interested in the truth. It is clearly proven that Blacks have a lower IQ, higher impulsiveness, more testosterone, higher crime rates. Political correctness tries to hide these clear statistics, and also tries to hide the clear evidence that this is genetic. Yes, black culture creates an environment that increases these IQ differences further, as has been mentioned here. http…
/r/MensRights28/07/11 03:17 AM
8

Debtor's prison, for men only, is world wide. Other soccer stars have been arrested. The argument that they are injured, and the career is tanking is not an argument. In Pato's case, he "only" has to pay for 24 months. I wonder if he was aware that her joining him in Italy would cost him a Million. Maybe such cost should be transparent before the fact, not afterwards
/r/MensRights28/07/11 02:51 AM
6

exactly. When it is insurance for old age pension, where women work less years and live longer, there they want equal premiums to men. http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/mens-rights-feminism/against-feminist-entitlement-bias-gender-equality-requires-women-to-retire-older-then-men-to-have-equal-duration-of-retirement-and-years-worked Where men cause more accidents, there feminists want men to pay more. Where women need more health insurance, they still differentiate by sex, but women probabl…
/r/MensRights27/07/11 10:24 PM
0

young adolescent boys/men are daredevils, they have the highest crime rates, murder rates, the most fights, and probably the most risky driving behavior. All that is explained by evolutionary psychology: they need to become the alpha top dog that gets the women. The lower half of the men will not procreate at all. So for unmarried men it is worth risking their life at that age. Being a very low ranking male is reproductive death. The genes end here. Women on the other hand don't gain from risky …
/r/MensRights27/07/11 09:48 PM
2

Most likely young adolescent Blacks have higher accident rates then Whites and Asians. Maybe someone has the data? If that were true, it probably is still prohibited for being discriminatory. That gets us to the point that discriminating against white males is legal and ok (like in the case above). Not sure if our poster is white, but certainly he is being discriminated for being male. It seems legal to discriminate by age. Very young and very old are more risky for car accidents. Middle age is …
/r/MensRights27/07/11 09:43 PM
2

Not that his actions can be defended in any way. But, maybe some people here can sympathize with how the feminists describe his thinking. Again, no defense of his actions Nevertheless, the right clings to the idea that feminism is destroying Western societies from the inside, creating space for Islamism to take cover. This politics of emasculation gave shape to Breivik’s rage. Thus, while he pretends to abhor Muslim subjugation of women, he writes that the “fate of European civilisation depends …
/r/MensRights27/07/11 03:45 PM
9

and the force a man to pay for the baby is life-long slavery, enforced by debtor's jail. Let the woman decide on her body, and the man on his money. Equality! Now there would be sound reasons to allow the couple to agree for the man to assume full responsibility and guardianship in exchange for her to bring the baby to term and then surrendering it to the father. In general, there should be more freedom for a couple to make binding agreements about child support.
/r/MensRights27/07/11 10:13 AM
4

They actually should go to jail for malicious felony fraud, taking advantage of a gullible trusting man. Causing trauma in a child! But this is a good start.
/r/MensRights27/07/11 10:08 AM
1

well, they have a reason to ask for family history. So if you have the WRONG family history, convinced it is right, you are talking missing true health hazards and wasting money on unnecessary exams for the history of your wrong father.
/r/MensRights27/07/11 10:07 AM
2

Strange: how old were the students? how did authorities find out? Were these "orgies"? Seems they are protecting the teacher by not mentioning that fact. If it were a man, that alone would be reason for character assassination. There is always the question, of course, if the poor boys were helpless victims of the mean abusive teacher, if it caused them serious psychological harm. Before you down-vote: I would ask the same question in the case of female "victims" too. How necessary is it to prote…
/r/MensRights27/07/11 06:42 AM
0

they have to figure out if the testimony of the boys can sustain the statement of insanity, or if it blatantly contradicts it. They have to fiddle the justification of the insanity plea according to what they boys said. Obvious! the next step will be accusing the boys of rape. Just wait ........... Isn't that obvious? Interesting: the students are not called "victims" Interesting: I can not see where it says how old the students were
/r/MensRights27/07/11 06:37 AM
2

feminists win all battles, even the most absurd ones. Like getting money for children that are proven not the man's. And getting away with murder, and penis slicing.
/r/MensRights26/07/11 09:50 PM
4

Strict liability and mens rea: go to prison even if you did all possible precautions to avoid a crime Strict liability makes sense in minor crimes, if it does not need to be proven a defendant knew that there was a non-parking sign. But would anyone be convicted of a parking violation if he could prove that government had put a "Parking" sign there? No! Such insanity only is valid in criminal sex persecutions, 95% of which are against men. If you read legal literature [1] [2] [3] [4] about lack …
/r/MensRights26/07/11 07:23 PM
3

This is so ridiculously disgusting! The very end on page 5: Sex buyers are overwhelmingly male, and they purchase males as well as females. Whatever its form, the underlying question posed by prostitution remains the same: should people be entitled to buy other human beings for sexual gratification? If such ancient practices are to be curtailed, both johns and men who don’t buy sex will have to rethink their complicity, according to Ted Bunch, cofounder of A Call to Men, a national organization …
/r/MensRights26/07/11 06:20 PM
1

It's not right to punish the child because the mother sucks. This feminist BS really pisses me off. It is right to punish an innocent man if mother is a cheating lying fraudster. Children get punished when mom drinks, smokes, over-eats when pregnant. Children get punished when mom decides to move to a different city. What they really want is to reward mom with money for lying. You should stop paying (stop rewarding mom for lying. No chance to actually punish mom) and continue treating the kid we…
/r/MensRights26/07/11 07:58 AM
3

These guys overstepped boundaries, sure. But why is it so much worse to have suffer an attack with some sexual connotations, as supposed to getting a few teeth knocked out, your face re-arranged, your internal organs damaged or bones broken? Violent adolescents who beat their class mates into permanent disfigurement don't get any long term consequence. Certainly there is no life-long bully registry.
/r/MensRights22/07/11 10:28 AM
-3

Right. This is the law of this country. And it is only getting worse. And a large part of MR activists here down-vote, threaten, chide, and censor people for saying otherwise here. Saying that 17 year old sex should be legal is still allowed. Defending that boyfriends of 15 year olds should not go to jail for 15 years is reason for banning here (so I will not say defend this). Men should go to jail for even looking at nude photos of such girls, this is the prevailing opinion even here. Men's rig…
/r/MensRights22/07/11 08:45 AM
1

well, gay marriage and gay common law marriage will cause lots of problem. Of course, in the gay case, who will be the legally privileged, the "woman"? The more feminine partner?
/r/MensRights22/07/11 08:38 AM
4

He should have been wiser then to marry without pre-nup. But probably he could not convince a high class woman to settle at his terms. I am also wondering if his wife does not have lots of assets? Or maybe, she brought the assets already into marriage (untouchable) while his assets were mainly acquired during marriage? I think couples should make yearly statements as to who deserves what part of the assets, who earned them and who has, given enough support and help so they deserve a share of xx%…
/r/MensRights22/07/11 08:19 AM
1

I think people can have whatever feelings, even if the feelings are unjust and sexist. These feelings should not be enshrined in unjust sexist laws that give enormous, one-sided power to females, supported by police, legal system, family court debtor's prison. The legal system must be just and fair, respecting due process and constitutional rights. The problem is that female feelings of being slightly inconvenienced lead to sexual harassment industry (When weakness is a weapon) and other monstro…
/r/MensRights22/07/11 08:09 AM
1

and poverty is a reason for bank robbery.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 10:04 AM
1

Page is here now http://www.facebook.com/pages/Free-Catherine-Kieu-Becker/190474051007423
/r/MensRights20/07/11 09:48 AM
2

Page is here now http://www.facebook.com/pages/Free-Catherine-Kieu-Becker/190474051007423 did you know, you can donate with paypal? No, not for the victim, for the poor mutilator
/r/MensRights20/07/11 09:48 AM
2

All quotes are from the facebook page. People like you they only demonstrate the irrational, absurd hatred of ignorant people. You don't understand Truth is, women don't just decide to cut off another person's genitalia for no reason And be careful: All men who don't know how to treat their wives and who are adulterers and abusers deserve to have this happen to them. You get what you give ** if this was a page: "All cheating wives deserve to be raped, and then to have their clit cut off", facebo…
/r/MensRights20/07/11 09:45 AM
5

The debt crisis has a lot to do with female spending preferences. It also has to do with greedy men who want to earn lots of money to impress women. Women could start choosing humble, simple men with little money. They could start shaming bankers who make lots of money, and politicians who hand out too much money.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 07:44 AM
1

why was this downvoted by feminists? probably because they saw kloo commenting? Or did they just not care about the article?
/r/MensRights20/07/11 07:30 AM
-1

The man with the bald head, that is sexist. There are no women with bald heads. On the other hand, there are men with huge chests. You are right, the guy could have used "big tits" eeerrr "big chest" just as a descriptive term, like the "short girl".
/r/MensRights20/07/11 07:24 AM
3

Isn't it ok to talk while washing the hands in the men's room?
/r/MensRights20/07/11 07:16 AM
2

usually men are the "sex offenders", because women tend to pick men older then they themselves not even to mention anti male bias by police, courts, and society all this is misleading, his sex offense was sleeping with the girl's mom, his wife of over 15 years
/r/MensRights20/07/11 06:40 AM
1

right. Add to this the fact that he was convicted for having sex with the mom of the child in question. He had sex with his wife, or wife to be.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 06:38 AM
5

He is lucky. She could have cleaned up his bank account first. But he still faces problems. She can divorce him now and get him to pay support to her. Or she can get a cute black child from her boyfriend and the husband is the putative father, to pay child support.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 06:16 AM
1

This story is purposefully misleading. rlier this month, a judge gave custody to the child's father, Donald Coleman, a registered sex offender who impregnated Trista Crews Coleman in 1997 when he was 38 and she was 14 years old. That kid is already 13. She kept sleeping with him and getting herself impregnated for at least another 10 years. She was 24 when she got herself pregnant again. Coleman was arrested after the couple wed in 1997, and court records show he pleaded guilty to a sex crime in…
/r/MensRights20/07/11 05:56 AM
3

Deserves him right. His chivalry cost him a lot of money. Elin committed domestic violence, and he covered it up. That is pretty clear. I got this from several sources, including from a personal assistant to Tiger. See this link http://www.jessicagottlieb.com/2009/12/domestic-violence-tiger-woods-elin-nordegren/ Had he gotten her arrested when she was beating him with the golf irons, he could have gotten the kids and a much better settlement. Women don't repay for chivalry. See what it cost him.…
/r/MensRights19/07/11 07:05 PM
2

perfectly right. But statistically, blacks commit more crimes. And the fact is hidden, by mainstream press. They say youth attacked people, when it was black youth. Black crime is whitewashed as much as women's crime. Maybe not at sentencing, but at reporting.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 02:22 PM
2

oh yes. If you say men should not get 15 years in jail for consensual sex with a 15 year old, that gets censored. If you say that research shows that liberating child porn reduces violence against children, our moderators are not concerned with saving children but out of principle censor the article and deprive the r/mensrights readers of that important academic research.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 01:37 PM
1

If you watch the Kachelmann rape case in Germany (google it, human stupidity wrote about it), there are experts in false crime accusations and self injury. Put one such guy to analyze the woman's forensics, and he should be able to prove she did it to herself. Or that someone else did it and he has to be found. That would be harder. Someone else did it with her cooperation. But cooperative injury also should have its signs. Mr Gonzales needs to contact such a man in Germany. Get him, or get him …
/r/MensRights19/07/11 10:06 AM
3

If you are willing to blindly believe the woman, you may accept as proof If she has sperm inside If she is pregnant if she has STD All of this can perfectly happen with either consensual sex, or sex with a totally different person Rape, unless extremely violent, can hardly be proven by medical exams!? And she still has the option to self-injury ....
/r/MensRights18/07/11 12:41 PM
3

You might not be aware that for the average poor Indian, 400 dollars is a huge amount of money. Furthermore, if she has a STD or somehow got herself pregnant, the incentive to invent a rape lie becomes much bigger Under the scheme, Financial Assistance and Support Services to Victims of Rape, a woman shall be entitled to an interim assistance of Rs 20,000 to take care of her immediate needs. The relief will be handed over within 15 days of filing the FIR after a medical examination confirms rape…
/r/MensRights18/07/11 10:10 AM
8

This is an example of a NEGATIVE post so terrible it should be read, mentioned and upvoted. At the same time, it should not get link juice, it should be linked like "nofollow" This "negative example" feature is missing in reddit.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 09:13 AM
10

Nice. Women have thought of this before: 4 women tie down man, super-glue his dick to his belly. Free on $200 bail
/r/MensRights17/07/11 12:36 PM
10

I just inverted the sexes, for demonstration purposes. Men are not that vile. Never ever would a talk show host, audience, guests condone such barbarity. Only women are that mean, violent and vengeful! It is the secret fantasy of many women to cut off a man's penis. (No, I am not a misogynist. Watch the video to believe it it totally true) This is simply re-gendered from a popular TV show that made fun of the hilarious case of a woman that cut off her husband's dick and put it through the meat g…
/r/MensRights17/07/11 10:10 AM
1

Gemma is some small commentator. You might try to flag it as offensive. she sure got upvoted a lot. The kid was convicted for vandalism under heavy drug influence. Probably deserves a lesson, but not rape, nor 16 months. A women, of course, would have been understood. PMS or some drug use because of a history of abuse excuse any crime
/r/MensRights16/07/11 11:27 AM
2

Kerger gave 294 eighth- and ninth-grade boys and girls questionnaires asking them whether they would like to study biology, physics, information technology or statistics the following year. Instead of naming these subjects, the questionnaire presented each science through topics found in previous studies to be either male- or female-friendly. “How does a laser read a CD?” was a masculine way to ask about physics, while “how is a laser used in cosmetic surgery?” addressed stereotypical girls’ con…
/r/MensRights16/07/11 08:43 AM
1

Kerger gave 294 eighth- and ninth-grade boys and girls questionnaires asking them whether they would like to study biology, physics, information technology or statistics the following year. Instead of naming these subjects, the questionnaire presented each science through topics found in previous studies to be either male- or female-friendly. “How does a laser read a CD?” was a masculine way to ask about physics, while “how is a laser used in cosmetic surgery?” addressed stereotypical girls’ con…
/r/MensRights16/07/11 08:37 AM
1

How much over-representation do they want at college? 57% in science, too? What about making schools and colleges boy-friendly? While women now constitute a sizable majority of U.S. college students — they received more than 57 percent of bachelor’s degrees in 2008 — females earned fewer than 35 percent of degrees in science, technology, engineering and mathematics awarded that year, according to Linda J Sax, a professor of education at the UCLA.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 08:34 AM
3

This is a tongue in cheek article. Maybe the readers here have better examples of woman cougars being encouraged while male marriage of much younger but legal aged women is frowned upon.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 03:01 PM
1

precisely! Read the false rape society blog. http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/ Or angry Harry. Or theantifeminist.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 08:12 AM
2

right. It is "true satire", it is actually true and ruins men's lifes completely, either financially, or by jail and sex offender registration. By the way, sex offender registration became completely useless, my mixing 5% of true dangerous predators with 95% of harmless lovers, falsely accuses, photo possessing decent men.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 08:08 AM
2

if there is the slightest doubt, the criminal is always the man. As I said before, if the woman slices off his dick, he is at fault because he abused her by going out with other women. You can not win. Only if you have a surveillance movie of her tying you up or threatening you with a weapon. Anything less will not lead to the conviction of a woman.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 06:41 PM
2

it is always the man's fault. 2 drunk people, the man is the rapist. Even if a man gets killed by a woman, it is his fault because he was abusive. I am actually serious, I would consult a lawyer before you go to police. She might counter-sue and prevail. Just get counselling.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 06:39 PM
1

this isn't the first time this has happened? By feminist norms we should not blame victims, so if you get raped 100 times then still you have absolutely no responsibility. But from a different viewpoint, maybe you should not get wasted, or have a true friend as responsible adult to watch out for you whenever you get totally drunk. That would also prevent you from sleeping in the gutter with your house key, ID, and money. Again, no victim blaming if someone takes your key and your ID and cleans o…
/r/MensRights11/07/11 06:37 PM
1

If you invert the genders, tell you are a woman, then go to any feminist board, you will earn LOTS of sympathy. If you tell the truth, feminists might not be so understanding. They might even call you a rapist, if she was a little drunk too. Men are always perpetrators, women always victims. Even Lorena Bobbit, the dick cutter, was a victim of John's cruel womanizing.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 06:25 PM
3

according to feminist rape definitions he certainly was raped. If he were a woman the guy had no way out, to avoid jail. Now according to other older definitions one could say: he should have behaved more wisely and should just use it as a learning experience. But these are not valid definitions, at least not if the genders were reversed. If she ever got pregnant, then the financial "rape" will be unavoidable. There is a case where the guy was totally passed out, and she bragged about him not ev…
/r/MensRights11/07/11 06:19 PM
0

you are very attentive, you may be right. the cited source was clear that the man was charged for being negligible in leaving his kid with crazy despite warnings that she was incredibly dangerous, NOT responsibility for her crime as claimed. Still leaves many other points. Also never a woman would be held responsible for the crimes of her husband. She would always be a victim. what's left is REASONABLE, like checking age. Not if someone goes to jail for having sex with a woman that has a fake ID…
/r/MensRights11/07/11 06:14 PM
1

but it is true. If one partner engages in a type of sex that was not agreed to, it is rape. Well, as long as the new rape definitions remain valid. She engaged him in anal sex without his knowledge or informed consent.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 04:32 PM
-1

Can not stand the truth? If you have valid arguments against it, please debunk the article and its argumentation. Quite well researched!!
/r/MensRights11/07/11 02:49 PM
-6

34 is quite inumerous, don't you think? Did you read the article, and the other one it links to? It is sad but true
/r/MensRights11/07/11 02:49 PM
3

If it weren't so sad and serious, this could be a humorous article. But all risks can be financially very costly, can carry high jail terms. These dangers are no jokes. If you want to downvote because you are a good married monogamous family man, think twice. There are dangers for all men, be they adolescents, adults, pick up artists, married family men. Think family court, abuse charges, cuckolding. For those still dating, anyone that looks under 35 can potentially be 17, giving 15 years in jai…
/r/MensRights11/07/11 12:57 PM
3

Several issues: People who are either innocent, or convicted by unjust laws, often correctly refuse to plea bargain or to admit guilt in rehabilitation and therapy. Thus they spend their full sentence to the very last day. I think r/mensrights had several examples of this!? I think some innocently convicted "rapists" had such issues, they refused to admit guilt and repent in prison therapy and thus were ineligible for early release. Guilty true rapists would get released years earlier. I think T…
/r/MensRights11/07/11 07:12 AM
7

Interesting. A woman can decide about the pregnancy, abortion or not. That is her birth right. She can even smoke and drink and damage the baby for life. That is her right. No matter how poor she is, no matter how poor the father is (or if she has no clue who the father is, or if he died already), she has the right to have a baby. No matter how rich she is and how much money she has, the needs of the baby require that father pays (WTF?) (future) fathers have no right to decide about their wallet…
/r/MensRights10/07/11 07:05 AM
5

Do you agree that a man having sex with his 14 year old daughter should get such a short jail term? And a man who has sex with a non-related 14 year old should get even less punishment? Then (very) few people here might agree with you. Now if you think she should get off, because she is a woman, you will not find many fans here. She committed incest with a fairly young minor.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 07:27 PM
3

Did you read page #2? http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/07/kbr-could-win-jamie-leigh-jones-rape-trial?page=2 She is a den of lies! It is typical that the justice system, lawyers, judges, companies, and innocent men lose years of their lives, work, and lots of money due to accusations by manipulative or psychotic women. One lie and you are out. And get prosecuted for perjury. That should be the rule! See also Strauss Kahn and hundreds of other rape and harassment cases.
/r/MensRights08/07/11 09:16 AM
3

The woman fondled him only because she was absolutely terrified what would happen to her if she did not fondle. Why has nobody thought of this brilliant justification to discount video camera evidence.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 03:12 AM
0

"Reclaim the night" money-slut walk in gang area @2am. We don’t deserve to be told to leave our cash and Rolex at home to avoid being victimized.
/r/MensRights07/07/11 01:26 AM
1

Great article. Good summary. MUST read!
/r/MensRights04/07/11 11:31 PM
3

Even though you will be downvoted (or ignored), you have a point. Trying to earn my Kudos: Female romance novels, and photos of princes marrying plebeyan women, romance movies, film stars, Justin Bieber, Arnold Schwarzenegger, all this female porn gives women unrealistic images of men. Real men don't measure up with the rich, handsome, intelligent, witty, successful movie star doctor she wants to marry. Exactly mirror image of Naomi's argument. Add to this that feminist propaganda, divorce laws,…
/r/MensRights04/07/11 08:50 AM
3

you are close. Female romance novels, and photos of princes marrying plebeyan women, romance movies, filmstars, all this female porn gives women unrealistic images of men. Real men don't measure up with the rich, handsome, successful movie star doctor she wants to marry. Exactly mirror image of Naomi's argument.
/r/MensRights04/07/11 08:46 AM
1

That problem can be solved very easily: Get prostitutes from licensed escort agencies. Oh, the law does not allow this? Well, the law helps to spread STDs. The law endangers men and women because they drive prostitution underground. Maybe this was not the point you were trying to make, sorry.
/r/MensRights04/07/11 07:54 AM
4

step 4) embezzle money step 5) blame it on the husband you killed
/r/MensRights26/06/11 12:55 AM
8

so that is why you lock up teens who photograph themselves? Have you ever thought about this? You can not photograph yourself without committing a crime? What if you look at yourself in the mirror? That might be a crime too? Pure insanity. You might prohibit commercial movies of under-18 year olds. Penalize those who make the movies. Not those who possess them, or don't have proof of age handy.
/r/MensRights26/06/11 12:51 AM
3

If you totally anti male biased court system acquitted him, then, believe me, it was not something terrible. Probably a small mistake or accident. If he did that habitually, a couple of times a week, then it would be serious. But once in a life time! And if he was a creep, he could deny it. He openly admits to it, because he is a serious honest guy. Compare that to pregnant women who drink and get a child with permanent life long brain damage (Fetal Alcohol syndrome). Now that is serious! And no…
/r/MensRights26/06/11 12:15 AM
8

Mrs Falls, from Brisbane, pleaded guilty to defrauding Centrelink of almost $80,000, but claimed her violent and controlling spouse Rodney had forced her to commit the crime. The mother-of-four made headlines last year when she was found not guilty of her husband's 2006 murder. Mrs Falls had drugged her husband's dinner before shooting him in the head. She kept his body for several days before his corpse was dumped in a forest, and then reported him missing. Need I say more? Defence barrister Je…
/r/MensRights25/06/11 01:56 PM
8

The movies are great, because you can actually see the live women, crying about their conviction. Much more realistic and personal then the mug-shot photos we usually see Of course, on second thoughts, would they ever give so much attention to male child raping perverts and their declarations?
/r/MensRights25/06/11 01:36 PM
1

well, should that creepy rule become law with serious long jail terms? Dislike is one thing, filling up prisons is another. So a 60 year old with a 30 year old is creepy. Should he get jailed, too? I mean I think piercings are creepy. Especially lots of them. But I would not jail anyone, even for the worst piercings.
/r/MensRights25/06/11 01:35 PM
17

Or is it the opposite? Sex has more serious consequences for boys then for girls: The double standard should be inverted! Boys are at risk for wage slavery for child support. Women can always abort.
/r/MensRights25/06/11 12:16 PM
1

can you elaborate? maybe with links? which civilisation?
/r/MensRights20/06/11 11:37 PM
2

For child abuse a man is presumed guilty unless proven innocent. A man getting away with a not guilty verdict is probably pretty innocent. It seems he hit her several times the same day. Not constantly. It also does not seem that blood was gushing out. Would have been wiser to hit her on the behind, there is no chance to draw blood accidentally. The article is exactly about the issue that men are constantly persecuted unjustly. Also that all these laws make mountains out of mole hills. Can you i…
/r/MensRights20/06/11 11:36 PM
3

It seems banned because it does not show up anywhere on the 2x lists. It should be high up on controversial. http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/mens-rights-feminism/4-out-of-5-rape-accusations-are-false-austrian-head-of-vice-police
/r/MensRights17/06/11 04:28 PM
10

1) how can a court order a man to pay waaayy over 100% of his income in child support? that is sick!! 2) why can't the darn woman get a job? or worse, maybe she has a job and he still has to pay in spite of having no income? 3) The little girl that was spanked by dad and inadvertently got a little blood drawn: once she grows up and finds out her dad was arrested and finally died for that, she will freak out and get angry at anyone but her dad. SHOCKING!!
/r/MensRights17/06/11 05:21 AM
1

true, but it begs an explanation. Main failure is to overlook sex differences in mating patterns, attraction, promiscuity.
/r/MensRights12/06/11 11:51 PM
1

The main problem in these discussions is that you don't know what type of rape has happened. http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/social-rules-habits/manipulate-language/rape-is-rape-is-rape-is-a-lie-joe-biden-20-different-types-of-rape The feminist confusion tactic about the word "rape" creates such confusion. If she willingly consensually agreed to sex, it still was rape. Do you agree that if a girl willingly engaged in sex that maybe victim blaming is not totally unjustified? Unfortunately…
/r/MensRights12/06/11 08:05 AM
1

This is meant tongue in cheek. Maybe people would notice the absurdity of the demands and then start rescinding feminist anti-male laws instead of adding anti-female laws But the point is that male rights people are lame pussies compared to the ferociously successful feminists who get the most amazing laws passed that unjustly favor women over men. In family court, in criminal cases, in violation of due process. I do hope that this will not be blocked as misogynist, but rather serves as a discus…
/r/MensRights11/06/11 09:37 AM
4

Most Latina women (outside the USA) love cat calls. I heard girls complaining that they walked half a mile and nobody cat-called her. Was she getting ugly?
/r/MensRights11/06/11 09:23 AM
11

If you are a filipino doctor, not brainwashed by feminist society, then it is kind of natural why a man did not stand up to the woman. I also suppose if a man really moved into serious self defense mode without concern about hurting the women, most likely he could stand up to her. Of course, in the US, this self defense would get him into jail. By the sexist out fashioned thinking, she deserved it and nothing would happen to him. I am saying this because I hang out in countries where men still a…
/r/MensRights11/06/11 09:20 AM
2

This is pretty similar to Strauss-Kahn. A famous man with multiple talent (he owned the weather prediction company and presented the weather report in funny ways) arrested on mere accusation. The man is a womanizer and famous and gets blamed for that.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 07:46 PM
8

Isn't there a race angle too that gets ignored? http://unamusementpark.wordpress.com/2011/05/07/black-mobs-and-the-second-law-of-race-and-crime-part-1/
/r/MensRights31/05/11 09:16 AM
2

Heather Mac Donald amazing. The author is a woman! How can women join special forces when they can’t even handle frat-boy pranks? This sums it all up That wise precept, “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words can never hurt me,” has obviously long disappeared among the sisterhood, however.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 09:08 AM
2

Additionally male chivalry is a problem. Men can not bear to hear the screams of injured women. Men take enormous risks to save women from danger. You can see it already, there were several cases where HUGE disproportional effort has been made to save one single woman prisoner of war. Men can never be trained to treat women as equal. They always treat them better. Chivalry at the SEALS is fatal.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 08:56 AM
9

I first thought so too. Then I read that male chivalry is a problem. Men can not bear to hear the screams of injured women. Men take enormous risks to save women from danger. You can see it already, there were several cases where HUGE disproportional effort has been made to save one single woman. Men can never be trained to treat women as equal. They always treat them better. Chivalry at the SEALS is fatal.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 08:52 AM
2

are you joking? exactly the same mechanisms as anywhere else. In the US, Britain, Australia. Read the false rape society http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/ It would be hard to find where the differences are. Prosecution abuse? The accuser is always believed even after she has been caught red handed while lying? The accused is jailed in spite of lack of evidence. The accused is wrecked financially The accused's promising career has been ruined
/r/MensRights31/05/11 08:45 AM
7

All this messy court case, career destruction, jail time, ruinous cost for defense and expert witnesses is due only to removal of due process from our court system in rape and child abuse accusations. the lie that "all men are rapists". If it were not for the feminine myth that all men are rapists, the burden of proof would be really high to think that such a man would, out of a sudden, violently rape a woman at knife point: A famous, well known, civilized and non-violent man that has a dozen gi…
/r/MensRights30/05/11 09:40 PM
1

reddit should have a way to link to a site with nofollow. Reddit's "the worst" sites
/r/MensRights30/05/11 09:34 PM
-3

If you had sex with her the night before but she doesn’t want morning sex and you pressure her for it anyway then you’re a rapist. If it’s your wedding night and she doesn’t WANT to have sex with you and you force or coerce her anyway then you’re a rapist. But he has to pay the bills, has to support her. If you don’t believe a woman when she says she was raped then you’re encouraging rape. It is true, we should not send traffic there. But she truly describes what feminist laws think. So this is …
/r/MensRights30/05/11 09:33 PM
2

she should scream during the rape, alleged rape, .. THAT is the problem, that they only scream the next day.
/r/MensRights30/05/11 09:10 PM
4

Don't forget that most rapes are drunk girls that say yes, or say nothing. If they yelled, that would be extremely useful for the guy to know that she actually does not consent. Also consensual sex with minors with fake ID, if she yelled, that would certainly scare the guy off. It would have helped in the Stauss-Kahn case, especially if she had yelled before the open door was closed.
/r/MensRights30/05/11 09:07 PM
1

Isn't it the opposite of what you say? there is affirmative action and quotas for women there is affirmative action and quotas for blacks underqualified women take away jobs from men underqualified blacks take away jobs from whites Women can beat a man with no major consequences blacks can beat whites with no major consequences A man slightly offending or lightly hitting a woman: instant arrest A white slightly offending or lightly hitting a black: instant arrest Isn't it the opposite of what yo…
/r/MensRights29/05/11 08:32 PM
3

It actually is a women's rights issue too: Many girls have been traumatized by having their boyfriends or husbands taken away, even leaving them fatherless and penniless with babies.
/r/MensRights29/05/11 10:38 AM
7

This hopefully is a men's rights issue: 90 % of all jail sentences and arrests are men. It just so happens that men are usually a bit older then the girl friends to prevent men from having sex, through sheer terror, insane senseless laws create misery among men.
/r/MensRights29/05/11 10:34 AM
1

http://www.menstuff.org/issues/byissue/malelactation.html Under the appropriate hormonal stimulus -- the hormonal stimulus that nature provides to human females when they become pregnant and give birth -- the mammary glands of human males can also produce milk. The volume of milk produced is low relative to that of a lactating female. Male lactation is most commonly caused by hormonal treatments given to men suffering from prostate cancer. Female hormones are used to retard the production of can…
/r/MensRights25/05/11 07:51 AM
1

Please send links how this would work. Even women can not breast feed once their milk dries out or if they were never pregnant in the first place.
/r/MensRights25/05/11 07:44 AM
4

she could have shot him in "self defense" and pleaded "battered woman syndrome". Probably in this case she would get a 10 day sentence.
/r/MensRights25/05/11 07:42 AM
3

collect the best proof possible of all her wrong doings Maybe keep a diary with all the times when she left, when she came back, etc. Make voice or video recordings, but first study your state laws regarding recordings. Get witnesses, take down their addresses maybe your wife walks past security cams? Unfortunately those will get deleted soon ....... You might need to get an apartment in your state. Of course, if you were a woman you probably could grab your kids and just move to a different sta…
/r/MensRights24/05/11 11:16 PM
2

Uh, yeah. An innocent man in prison means a guilty man goes free. The only perfect crime is one that everybody thinks is solved. not really. It may be that the rape never happened, a false rape accusation.
/r/MensRights24/05/11 09:47 AM
-8

Yes in the last half century, it was legally impossible for a man to rape someone he was legally married to, which is half ok and half problematic. If he beats and threatens her, if she has no chance to leave, yes he is a rapist. But it is a problem if every man has to live in fear to go to jail because his wife can claim: that 5 year ago she once asked him to stop and he continued and thus is a rapist it was legally impossible for someone to be punished for having sex with someone who was uncon…
/r/MensRights23/05/11 03:43 PM
1

the problem is that this is the majority of women of all ages. A large number of women drinks to lose sexual inhibitions. Why do they all go to bars to get drunk at night? Maybe they should sign a waiver, saying that they get drunk on purpose in order to get laid. Now the law gives them permission to decide, the next day, if they should charge the guy with rape, or not.
/r/MensRights23/05/11 11:27 AM
-7

Rape the new feminist obsession. Rape the new frontier in Gender War In the last half century, rape has been re-defined. First rape is re-defined, so that dozens of crimes that had a different name before, or that did not even exist before, become rape. Almost everything is "rape" see (1) (2) (3) above in the article Pretty soon, having sex with a 20 year old is rape (when the age of consent will reach 21). Harassment and Objectifying gaze might become rape at some time. After all, if a woman fe…
/r/MensRights23/05/11 11:14 AM
0

As this paragraph points out, within the Aka tribe there’s a great deal of flexibility involved. The Aka is unusual because not only do fathers play an active role in child rearing, they also breastfeed! Yes, this is a quote from the article. Need I say more? Breastfeeding men would have greatly improved chances of getting custody in divorce proceedings.
/r/MensRights23/05/11 11:01 AM
7

I was at Sea World the other day. A father had brought her daughter into the men's room, which was packed. But then I realized what I was doing. I have been so affected by our culture that I let myself get angry at a father, and be scared for a poor girls life, and fearful of "clearly rapist men" when there was absolutely no danger. She was standing in the middle of the room, and there were men urinating, and waiting to do so all around her. I started to get angry when I couldn't find the father…
/r/MensRights23/05/11 08:34 AM
2

I think most girls are not good at saying yes to sex. Lots of girls actually drink with the prior intent to lose their inhibitions and engage in sex. Actually, most girls are excellently skilled in saying no to sex, because ever since they are 12 or even younger they have to fend off suitors of their own age and probably other ages. Girls reject guys constantly. Women reject guy's advances constantly. 99% of advances get rejected. Are you saying they have a problem saying no to the remaining 1%?
/r/MensRights22/05/11 04:14 PM
3

She is very modest. He makes 95 Million per year? She should demand and get half of that. $ 3 Million a month, $ 35 Million a year would be a modest demand. After all, she would want to fly helicopter to visit her horses. </end sarcasm>
/r/MensRights21/05/11 08:10 AM
2

the drunk consent to buy a candy bar or a sofa could be annulled and you get your money back. But never the seller would get a 15 year jail charge for robbery and fraud for having sold the item to you. Much less if the seller was just as drunk as you.
/r/MensRights21/05/11 08:03 AM
3

It could be: if feminists ask for absurd privileges and male ask for almost equality with minor privileges for women We will never get equality, rather maybe reduce the absurd privileges a little. We need to fight on equal footing
/r/MensRights20/05/11 03:43 PM
2

see http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/mens-rights-feminism/against-feminist-entitlement-bias-gender-equality-requires-women-to-retire-older-then-men-to-have-equal-duration-of-retirement-and-years-worked
/r/MensRights20/05/11 02:13 PM
3

read the article before downvoting. It is sad: feminists work towards female privileges and attain them. Men are egalitarian and want to fix a part of these privileges while leaving others untouched. Totally scared of asking for something that could be interpreted as male privilege, even if it is not.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 01:22 PM
1

in a few generations, even reading this reddit, possession of such texts will be punished with 20 years of jail.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 02:28 PM
7

He defends the current legal definition of rape and/or opposes making consent a defense. You are a rapist if you think consent is a defense against rape accusations. The Dworkin-rape definition. No matter if she consents or not, sex is rape. He is anti-abortion. He is pro-”choice” because he believes abortion access will make women more sexually available. You can't win. For or against abortion, you are a rapist. Of course, only if you are a man.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 02:20 PM
3

Remember: if fatherhood is not contested, within 2 years after birth, then the husband has to pay child support irrevocably and will remain the father. Of course Arnie pretends to keep paying, I am sure. Now the rape threat looms over all men. In this case, as soon as fatherhood is proven with DNA, any rape accusations would be a proven case. No matter if in reality Mildred pursued Arnie, as blogs contend.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 10:53 AM
4

prostitution is a feminist pet topic. All prostitutes are victims of trafficking and do this job only due to miserable life circumstances. It needs to be outlawed to protect the poor victims, because nobody prostitutes herself voluntarily Damn, I am good, i will start posting in 2x
/r/MensRights18/05/11 11:42 AM
0

Nothing justifies violence and rape. At least one feminist truth we can agree to. Well, of course, feminists apply it only to violence against women.
/r/MensRights18/05/11 08:13 AM
0

there is no way in this world, how a wife that sticks her finger up the ass of her husband, that has the habit of having her finger stuck up there, how she would get 5 year jail terms for sexual assault and rape There are implicit expectations among couples that you can continue doing what you always do. So no wife would be convicted as a car robber if she takes the car keys and uses the car for a day. Much less so if she habitually does that. I talked to a lot of men, and most were surprised th…
/r/MensRights17/05/11 11:29 PM
0

A girlfriend he usually has sex with, he usually sticks his finger into, and in an argument in bed, soon after sexual activity he sticks his finger in once more? And that deserves a few years in jail? Almost every man I know has been raped, by such criteria. By a girl that stuck her tongue or finger into his mouth, even against his protest. Or a girl that stuck her finger into his behind before he had a chance to tell her to pull it out because he does not like it. And that was the first time, n…
/r/MensRights17/05/11 10:44 PM
0

Tiger Woods wife, Hillary Clinton, so many female domestic abusers that remain unpunished, even un-accused.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 03:26 PM
3

It is a not so well kept secret that Tiger Wood's wife beat him with a golf club, while Tiger was sleeping under the influence of Ambien (totally groggy), fled with his car, and crashed it. He could have saved hundreds of Millions and kept the children, had he been areal man and told the truth to police and gotten her arrested and charged for domestic violence.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 03:24 PM
1

This is one of my pet topics: http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/social-rules-habits/manipulate-language/rape-is-rape-is-rape-is-a-lie-joe-biden-20-different-types-of-rape Everything is rape. It is totally absurd that consensually kissing and fondling a minor having consensual sex with a minor, or sex initiated with the minor dragging the minor into the woods at knife point are all the same crime with the same punishment. I keep saying: "ask the minor if she can notice a difference between …
/r/MensRights17/05/11 03:14 PM
0

I was going to say that it would be bad for her if she was found to be lying. But I forgot, probably nothing would happen. She would keep her half million bribe she might have gotten. She would get 20 hours of community service and a suspended sentence of 1 month.
/r/MensRights17/05/11 09:21 AM
9

That, of course, would be great to call attention to the false rape accusation epidemic. But, as incredible as the rape accusations are, it is unlikely that the maid is that stupid that she invents the entire story in a hotel that must be full of security cameras.
/r/MensRights16/05/11 02:56 PM
1

she surprised him. She had no business sneaking into a guest room while the guest is in there
/r/MensRights16/05/11 11:47 AM
1

You are right. But in this case the guy has money and is going for numbers.
/r/MensRights14/05/11 09:27 AM
1

I wish that same logic applied to college sports that are being cancelled. Men have their special desires for sporting competition. To rob men of their intramural football because women don't have the same zeal to competitive sports is ludicrous. Furthermore, men have more suicides and other serious problems that could be addressed individually.
/r/MensRights13/05/11 09:51 PM
2

Here are episodes of "dirty jobs" http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=dirty+jobs+with+mike+rowe+full+episodes&aq=1&oq=dirty+jobs
/r/MensRights12/05/11 09:57 AM
9

Brazilians are much more sexually liberated. Brazilian women are very different from US women. This might not last: US law and US prejudice are slowly taking a foothold in Brazil.
/r/MensRights12/05/11 09:11 AM
21

sure. There is even a case where the man REALLY was raped, and was of age He was completely passed out and unconscious and the woman bragged she fucked him and he did not even know. And no, he was not her regular partner. He had to pay child support. http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/mens-rights-feminism/men-pay-child-support-even-if-fraud-deceit-lie-rape The main law in these feminist days: All laws are always interpreted in ways that they favor women. Equality in rights, and special priv…
/r/MensRights11/05/11 12:36 PM
1

That is a nice theory. Sociologists are the worst, with theories that are ideologically pre-determined. This is where women's studies takes their ideological support. Sociology has such funny theories as: Gender is socially constructed. Men and women are only different due to educational bias and prejudice.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 08:14 AM
1

Please see comments here 6-year-old charged with sexual assault for consensual doctor play and here http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/h1ngs/6yearold_charged_with_sexual_assault_for/
/r/MensRights01/05/11 11:02 PM
3

nope. Males always are the culprit. Males always are the agressors. That starts with 6 year olds already. and really, why wouldn't being underage simply nullify the entire thing? an underage male doesn't have the same protections as an underage female? an underage male can commit the crime but an underage female can't? it's absurd.
/r/MensRights01/05/11 09:27 PM
8

Would be good to tell the whole story. Why did she feel you deserved to be kicked in the nuts? What has happened. By the way, in theory, you could call police for violent assault. Inside a bar with security the only legal reason for kicking someone in the nuts is immediate danger through an attack with a deadly weapon. Or course, this is not valid for women, they have special rights to abuse men. In regular
/r/MensRights01/05/11 11:28 AM
9

where does it say they will stand up? did not see this anywhere. I suggest everyone post a petition for Havard to stand up Actually, I miss this on all the other web site. Comments by men's righters calmly explaining the grotesque situation. Everyone should petition for the University to stand up for due process, presumption of innocence and the constitution, quoting http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2011/04/open-letter-to-persons-concerned-about.html http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2011…
/r/MensRights01/05/11 10:52 AM
1

AngryHarry.com wrote a lot about this. Don't remember what his argument was. No need to kill your husband, if you can get even by false rape or false child abuse accusations, or, if the guy really is bad, by true accusations.
/r/MensRights30/04/11 06:20 PM
4

The numbers are probably out of whack. Which actually takes away power from the article. Because actually, it does not matter how many thousands or millions pay support for a kit that isn't theirs: One man persecuted for not paying support for a kid that is not his, that is one too many. It is funny. Why does the law shield and protect the real fathers? 2 possibilities the woman does not KNOW who the real father is, or rather she can not find him the real father tends to be an alpha, like the po…
/r/MensRights27/04/11 08:53 PM
3

well, this will cost him at least US$ 100 000 over 20 years. Constant fights in court with the girl. Neurotic children with parental alienation. If not more.
/r/MensRights25/04/11 05:04 AM
4

Most of these examples are ball busting groin kicks from mainstream Hollywood movies. Would be very interesting to analyze in detail. gratuitous violence, simply for fun. That is the serious stuff. Teaching children and women (and men) that serious injurious violence against men is right. what is not here, but very bad are the low level violence like slaps in the face, throwing objects by women against men, which is socially accepted (another bad lesson that violence against men is ok) women in …
/r/MensRights24/04/11 01:53 PM
1

the state already foots the bill for indigent poor people's children. Reasonably well-off women can support children on their own. The only problem is well-off men and poor women, where the well-off partner was relieved of his obligation. This could actually be modified, that the well-off partner would have to support specifically the child with minimum support as high as welfare support. ONLY the child.
/r/MensRights24/04/11 10:02 AM
2

the guy that cannot carry enough load would never be hired. She only gets hired as a token quota woman. Men have to fulfill job requirements to be hired. Firefighters for example have to be able to carry heavy victims. Except if they are women.
/r/MensRights24/04/11 09:52 AM
1

In reality this is already the case. This is nothing new. All accused of rape are locked up first till they prove they are innocent. Only now the want to formalize the law. Right about the filming. This has been described this long ago Of course, if one person involved is 17, but legal, they cannot film or else it is Child porn. You can not win. http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality/27-precautions-before-risking-sex-with-a-woman
/r/MensRights19/04/11 02:47 PM
1

It's worse. A contract is not enough. You have to prove it was not retracted. Did you forget the 5-second-rape? Get a lawyer before sex: 27 precautions before risking sex with a woman http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality/27-precautions-before-risking-sex-with-a-woman
/r/MensRights19/04/11 02:44 PM
1

Do you notice the chivalry? All these men don't hit back! They should kill in self defense. Of course, that would get them into jail, because you don't beat a woman, even if she beats and mutilates you!! In most situations, they guys would have a chance to grab her and finish her off.
/r/MensRights18/04/11 06:52 AM
1

when will men learn from feminists? The first guy abused or killed (or his family) should sue the ass off these groups saying that they incite women's violence and are to blame for female maniacs. Of course, on the other hand, it is nice to see women shown as killing and abusing maniacs. Usually Hollywood depicts only men in this role The problem, of course, is that the women maniac perverts are depicted as positive role models.
/r/MensRights18/04/11 06:22 AM
1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dnTLx4XQDI the old link to the movie is dead
/r/MensRights18/04/11 06:17 AM
8

this proves why there should be a false rape accuser registry. She clearly is a menace to mankind Systematically abusing men with violence, lies, and false accusations.
/r/MensRights18/04/11 05:59 AM
1

It is still wrong. According from the text, an underage sex maniac rapist would escape registration too The fundamental flaw is that feminist laws equate consensual sex with minors with rape. A true forcible rapist deserves a sex offender registration. Otherwise a good law.
/r/MensRights18/04/11 05:54 AM
1

The serious problem is about buying girls Where is the slave market where I can buy a girl to own forever? how many millions do they cost? This is feminist language confusion. A WOMAN choses to offer her services for an hour, making lots more money then she would if she were to work in another job. I don't buy a toilet cleaner either. I pay her for her professional services, hourly or monthly wages.
/r/MensRights18/04/11 05:46 AM
6

great lawsuit shocking to even prevent totally innocent never accused athletes from competing because others were wrongly accused. Pretty clear cut case Shows the rape hysteria.
/r/MensRights18/04/11 05:37 AM
1

worse, she moved UP. And is a feminist promoting feminist agenda It would befit her character to violently batter Bill And feminists would probably applaud her. After all he got a blow job, so he deserves being beaten. (they probably think)
/r/MensRights18/04/11 05:29 AM
1

how did he humiliate her? beat her? say bad things? or just have fun with interns? And pick pudgy fat ones, too. Kennedy had a better taste with Marilyn Monroe. And the press did not pursue him
/r/MensRights18/04/11 05:27 AM
3

Mr W said he now suspected it may have been Miss N’s plan all along to have a child with a wealthy man from whom she could claim child support over the next 18 years. ‘We should have seen the signs when she started asking for more than we had agreed. I don’t think this was ever about her suddenly wanting to keep the baby, I think this was about getting an income.’ The chef said he would feel more comfortable paying for vouchers which could be redeemed on food and clothing than money which would …
/r/MensRights12/04/11 07:43 PM
-1

Interesting conspiracy theory. If it were true, it would be a good explanation. Anyone can corroborate this? Any explanation for the antifeminist's oberservation that the guardian now has many men's rights commenters? Did they also have contracts for all the newspapers? And who would be paying? Hillary? The safe house mafia?
/r/MensRights12/04/11 12:21 AM
0

Shocking. Normally self defense is judged so narrowly that a lot of robbery or street violence victims get convicted for defending themselves too vigorously. While in immediate danger. There is no provision in the law (except for women) to do any self defense when the immediate danger is over.
/r/MensRights11/04/11 11:00 PM
2

Shocking. Normally self defense is judged so narrowly that a lot of robbery or street violence victims get convicted for defending themselves too vigorously. While in immediate danger. There is no provision in the law (except for women) to do any self defense when the immediate danger is over.
/r/MensRights11/04/11 10:44 PM
9

I thought that is what all constitutions in the world say, all criminal codes. "Innocent until proven guilty", presumption of innocence. I just read about a guy who ran over 30 bicyclist, in some road rage. Obviously 100 people saw him doing it. He is presumed innocent.
/r/MensRights11/04/11 10:30 PM
8

The only one that uses a golf club to hit real people, has been Tiger Wood's wife Erin. Tiger Woods that night was drowsy on Ambien, and his wife attacked him with golf bats and seriously damaged his car's windshield.
/r/MensRights11/04/11 10:19 PM
14

153 of the 268 exonerations in the Innocence Project were for rape. This is 57.1 % rape convictions, we found in a search of the innocence project for "Rape". A large number was due to eyewitness misidentification. People freed by DNA testing are freed because the innocence has been proven. This confirms the false rape society suspicion, that people can easily be locked up for rape accusations, and that due process is violated especially in rape cases. The average sentence served by DNA exoneree…
/r/MensRights11/04/11 08:47 PM
1

There is something seriously flawed about your logic. You believe in the myth that women always are 100% correct and truthful in their court depositions about rape?
/r/MensRights11/04/11 08:43 PM
1

It is not only perpetrated by men. And nowadays, there are all kinds of non-forcible rapes. 20 different types of rape
/r/MensRights11/04/11 08:37 PM
1

Are you utterly confused? Are you saying: If the woman drank too much at the day of the alleged rape, that means she will be drunk in court and thus less credible? If she lies about having been drunk on the day of the "rape", or exaggerates it, how would that show on the court date? Actually, a great idea: if you want to be able to recant consent to sex, just act as if you were drunk in front of a few witnesses, while the sex partner does not see it. Act your true soberness in front of your sex …
/r/MensRights11/04/11 10:13 AM
-4

Rape is caused by all encompassing misleading rape definition *fondling a 17 year old girl friend in the US is rape *Having sex with a drunk girl in the US is rape. The amount of drunkenness needs not be proven, like in a car accident. The girl's word is enough, no matter how much she drank. false rape claims that are believed *You all know the false rape society. Anyone is aware that the cases described there are the lucky 1% that just happened to have a video recording that proved them innocen…
/r/MensRights11/04/11 09:20 AM
3

roughly equal at birth. After wars and constant fighting, it gets tilted. If half the men die, the surviving women still can have the same number of offspring (provided they can be fed and protected with the lower number of men)
/r/MensRights09/04/11 08:44 AM
1

I learned from men's rights sites that these privileges were not available to most men either. All feminist disinformation campaign which men's rights needs to counter.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 08:40 AM
2

I find it a problem if we send visitors and link juice to sites we despise. Maybe the main points should be posted here so people don't need to click and go there.
/r/MensRights08/04/11 06:09 PM
2

Being drenched with beer in a nightclub is pretty obnoxious. Walk around for the rest of the night reeking of beer and having your nice night club shirt and suit wet and screwed up, looking like a wet dog who swam in a beer keg. This is a lot more offensive then a light shove or even a light slap.
/r/MensRights08/04/11 06:07 PM
1

The laws (for the most part) are gender neutral. VAWA violence against women act Did you see all the rape and abuse specific laws that basically take away due process? http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality/rape-laws-no-due-process You do have a point though. In addition to biased law, police and judges add additional bias.
/r/MensRights07/04/11 08:50 AM
3

The fact is that most women' don't use their power to instantly jail a man on their whim. You talk as though most females are just waiting for a chance to pounce and send a guy to prison. I just don't want to expose myself or other men to this constant danger. It is like giving heavy weaponry to a man who did not have the military education and psychological testing to make sure he will use them wisely and with discipline. It's fucked up that women have as much power and that men's accusations a…
/r/MensRights06/04/11 03:48 PM
5

That is nice, if most women don't use their power to instantly jail a man at their whim. The problem is: in a democratic society, not even the kings should have so much power. Much less any average woman. And the author's point is: if the woman, at any time can unleash the entire might of the government, police, and justice system upon you, as a man you only can tread lightly. The power an average woman has is much bigger then anything any man ever had. A man using his power against a woman had …
/r/MensRights06/04/11 03:09 PM
8

Maybe 5 years of community service, then. NOt 500 hours (under 3 months full time). Or 20 years of paying child support for 5 orphans. Slave labor like men have to do for children that aren't theirs. And for heaven's sake, life long registration in the murder registry!
/r/MensRights02/04/11 10:30 AM
-2

there should be an opt out period. But unfortunately it is only in your (our) mind, not in the law. But I cannot see where he ever opted in. He never wanted the kid. NO IS NO
/r/MensRights31/03/11 09:47 AM
3

I think what is at fault is the LAW. There should be the possibility to make a legally binding agreement to father a kid with no financial involvement. A pre-pregnancy agreement, like a pre-nup. Let the woman have her wish. As long as she pays for it. And if there was no financial requirement, I think most dads would not mind to get at least a little involved with their kids, once it is their own flesh and blood. To appease government, maybe if the child is totally below the poverty line then da…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 09:41 AM
2

I read the woman's report. I think what is at fault is the LAW. There should be the possibility to make a legally binding agreement to father a kid with no financial involvement. A pre-pregnancy agreement. To appease government, maybe if the child is totally below the poverty line then dad would pay 100 dollars a month for baby food. But better not. Governments want more children by worthy people. So why should welfare only go to kids of unemployed or criminal deadbeat dads who pay no taxes? The…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 09:37 AM
4

I think you should DELETE this and re-submit as a text link. The site should not be promoted, rather we should discuss its "bad-ness"
/r/MensRights31/03/11 09:17 AM
10

you should have put this as a text link Now you give the good men project lots of traffic and link juice And this link should actually be downvoted. Your comment is valuable, not the link =============== here comes the bummer ============== Lynn Phillips, a psychology professor at New York University, did a famous study of young women (mostly under legal age) who were in relationships with significantly older men. Most of the girls she interviewed described these affairs as mutual, exciting, and…
/r/MensRights31/03/11 09:11 AM
-4

The poor girl is a victim. If she got a 13 year old boy, then she would not be a victim. Men are ruthless predators. He hunted her down systematically, though she was doing all she could to hide and protect herself. But she was helpless
/r/MensRights25/03/11 08:16 PM
0

Great to have real numbers did anyone analyze this "relatively". These are absolute numbers. He claims that father only families are rare, thus fathers are more violent. Mothers have more opportunity, much more time to be violent with the child. Also, does this mean the "family type" father and other, or does it mean that father and other committed the abuse together? On the other hand, are false accusations in divorce proceedings included?
/r/MensRights24/03/11 02:40 PM
1

right. The women did the abuse, the guy incited and watched and saved it on his computer. And yes, they were convicted are in 2 different countries.
/r/MensRights24/03/11 01:11 PM
6

I don't know if this guy accepts men's rights commenters on his/her blog. I also suggest not to be aggressive. Rather I would like to see real statistics, real research to comment about this blog. At the first glance it is preposterous to lump together blood related true dads with step dads and boyfriends. Then there could be false accusations, biases in reporting and punishment. Who has the statistics to refute?
/r/MensRights24/03/11 01:00 PM
7

I might get banned if I link to the photo. But you may go go google and type With this I am going to control your life Actually, this has a deep anti-feminist meaning. The girl shows her pussy and explains to the little boy "With this I am going to control your life"
/r/MensRights23/03/11 10:17 AM
1

that happens frequently. If you photograph your kids in the bath tub, or changing diapers, and send the photos to Walmart, you are doomed.
/r/MensRights19/03/11 12:55 AM
1

if you work as a nanny and have a problem with anger control, you deserve to rot in jail. If you work as nanny and have no clue how to deal with a baby without killing or permanently damaging it, likewise
/r/MensRights19/03/11 12:54 AM
1

That would be a good idea for the next Bronson movie. A vigilante killer going after all the PROVEN false rape accusers on false rape society. One after another. Maybe one of the guys freed on DNA evidence after 25 years in jail, unjustly! Such a guy is lucky, because in cases when no sex and no rape happened, there is no way to be freed by DNA evidence. Maybe his accuser even deserves a bit of slack because probably she was really raped and just made a mistake. Unlike the bitches who cry rape b…
/r/MensRights18/03/11 10:29 AM
3

The real problem is the absurd perverted justice system. No other alleged criminal gets jailed upon the unsubstantiated accusation of a single person: "hey, he robbed me 3 years ago, but I am reporting this only today".
/r/MensRights18/03/11 10:23 AM
8

I understand. Equality means more taxes for men men paying the dinner men paying child support men going to jail for broken condoms men paying child support even if the pregnancy is due to the woman's lie women can abort babies even if the husband wants the baby men going to jail whenever a woman cries rape because she regrets sex men being afraid to go near children for fear of child abuse accusations companies being forced to hire and promote women who otherwise would not be paid that much We …
/r/MensRights18/03/11 10:16 AM
10

getting downvoted already! Amazing. Do you think possession of any type of child porn by men should be punished multiple times more then women shaking infants to death?
/r/MensRights18/03/11 09:47 AM
5

well if it is the other way around, if a "catch a predator" 25 year old woman says she is 14, then he also goes to jail. even though the woman is 25 Either way, men are screwed
/r/MensRights14/03/11 10:04 PM
1

WTF is wrong with men's rights at Reddit? Not only does this post get more votes at r/WTF, it gets a somewhat higher percentage of people liking it. There are more "rape accuser apologists" at r/mensrights then at r/WTF? 151 points (68% like it) 285 up votes 134 down votes shortlink: redd.it/g3dax http://www.reddit.com/r/WTF/comments/g3dax/falsely_accused_of_rapea_few_weeks_in_jail_beaten/
/r/MensRights14/03/11 08:23 AM
5

Actually this is the direct link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xdk5O4J8aL4 And here the whole story http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/p/lamb-to-slaughter-hofstra-false-rape.html
/r/MensRights14/03/11 12:20 AM
3

Men get convicted for allegedly passing on HPV. So if you can reasonably prove she gave you herpes, you might sue her for a few hundred thousand dollars. Of course, as a man you probably don't stand too much of a chance. http://www.globegazette.com/news/local/article_c2c430c2-3e12-5848-83b1-ca10d06f1b80.html http://www.medhelp.org/posts/STDs/HPV-Lawsuit/show/604835 http://www.the-spearhead.com/2010/01/07/hpv-litigation-cases-and-why-men-are-at-risk/ http://www.myfoxchicago.com/dpp/news/offbeat/h…
/r/MensRights05/03/11 12:20 PM
1

The problem is that this is another way to get even with men, to get them arrested and bilk them out of money: A dentist in Iowa was ordered to pay US$ 1.5 million to a women he allegedly transmitted HPV (not HIV-AIDS) to. The woman provided no proof that she was HPV-free before her relationship, nor that he had HPV, nor that it was transmitted through their sexual relation. Nevertheless, in civil suits, if a jury or judge think it is 55% likely that one party is wrong, that party gets convicted…
/r/MensRights04/03/11 10:09 AM
1

Men are not targeted for violence JUST for being men, like women are for being more vulnerable in some places. If 200 men get killed, without being targeted for their gender. And 20 women get killed because they are women. Maybe we should not put all our resources into saving the 20 women and neglect the 200 men. Furthermore, who says she is killed because she is a woman? She is killed because she pissed off her husband. If a guy would nag and irritate him constantly, he would have killed him to…
/r/MensRights27/02/11 10:15 PM
1

Men's rights is not "not getting killed" and "not being victims of violence"? That is only a woman's right? Even though many more men get killed, injured, maimed then women? I appreciate if you have special personal interests among the huge gamut of men's issues. But, at least stay out of the way and don't prevent other men from searching their equal rights
/r/MensRights27/02/11 10:10 PM
5

interesting again. Who is voting against this? Translation of a legal text. A law that protects children against manipulation by one parent that nourishes hate and distance against the other parent. Probably because it is mostly women do this kind of child abuse, and thus feminists are against government interference in women's abusive ways. Equally as feminists are in favor of outlawing genetic testing without the perpetrator's consent (as it is law in Britain)
/r/MensRights25/02/11 09:36 AM
1

right. But the system is set up to eat up as many MEN as possible. It is also set up the set free women who murder and use violence against husbands.
/r/MensRights17/02/11 09:01 AM
2

I wonder why 40% vote down. Are they feminists? I also wonder why the entire English speaking press ignores this case. I know the false rape society has enough rapes that are PROVEN false, but if a famous US TV star was accused of rape with no proof, they probably would report on this
/r/MensRights17/02/11 08:47 AM
5

Great article. And this guy is a lawyer and not a men's rights activist.
/r/MensRights17/02/11 01:52 AM
1

Interesting. The question is: what is being solved by outlawing absolutely consensual sex in prison? Frustrated men tend to become more dangerous and more violent. Of course, if this really reduces prison rape, then it is a positive step. But I am not sure if it does reduce it.
/r/MensRights04/02/11 02:04 PM
-5

The question is: what is harrassment. Feminists are more worried about a woman hearing she has a nice ass (to take your own example) then about a man getting threated all day long for years, frequently raped and forced to oral sex. Which one of the two is worse? http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ff4kv/feminist_rape_laws_dont_apply_to_male_prison_rape/
/r/MensRights04/02/11 01:58 PM
2

this is official jail policy? I doubt it. Actually, if that were official jail policy, that would be pretty inhumane too: there should be a way to differentiate TRUE consent from forced consent. The article has a suggestion for this, too: As a possible solution: Human-Stupidity would suggest that in such cases a counselling session followed by a notarized declaration would be necessary to declare that sex is voluntary. Human-Stupidity has been proposing such a declaration to avoid potential vict…
/r/MensRights04/02/11 01:52 PM
-4

that is a very interesting link. The setup of the experiment is wrong. It is not a double blind study. Leaving the same assistant ask the questions for the test, makes the results prone to confirmation bias. You can bet that the assistant believes in feminist hypotheses. Shoddy research. In the service of feminists proving their point. Second flaw: put a real admirer of women's beauty there. Not a researcher who is faking some looks he himself feels awkward about. Really shoddy. But publishable …
/r/MensRights04/02/11 01:09 PM
-8

Men's rights activists are in such despair that they start to favor Sharia law and Muslim societies. Maybe instead we should unite to preserve Russia. Making passes and making compliments to co-workers really should not be a crime, like in the US. Once they actually fire them, or use actual violence, then it goes too far. But that too, should be proven, no inversion of the burden of proof. All the old generation University professors that started in the 1960íes are married to former graduate stu…
/r/MensRights04/02/11 11:54 AM
14

the main points: the total different rights of female rape victims and male rape victims in jail. The fact that many males in jail simply cave in to pressure and obey and become sex slaves. Nobody ever considers them rape victims. But by feminist definition every single person in jail that performs sex is a rape victim, because they are in a coercive environment. QUOTE FROM THE TEXT a female only needs to allege rape once and is believed. This would be a good rule to introduce in jails. In the c…
/r/MensRights04/02/11 11:47 AM
-1

http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/ read there http://www.reddit.com/user/PierceHarlan that should find you enough stuff. Not sure if there are links to academic articles, but 30 articles in top newspapers would probably suffice. Write to PierceHarlan too Of course, you will probably flunk the class for writing such a terrible subject.
/r/MensRights01/02/11 12:28 PM
8

READ THE DETAILS ABOUT THE REPRESSIVE BRITISH LAW. Men can only check if the woman allows for it. Dr Watt added that paternity tests can also tear marriages apart – making infidelity ‘much more painful’ and harder to forgive. Boots claims the kit meets a demand from customers for an easy to use, safe and accurate paternity test. Anglia DNA says it gives people access to a regulated, UK-based testing service via the high street for the first time. Most of the existing DIY kits are sent to America…
/r/MensRights01/02/11 12:18 PM
-4

Great! fantastic idea! Maybe this should be mandatory! Will never ever happen, though. I think men have to counter-attack. Not just try to undo damage done to them by feminists, but actually actively aggressively defend and extend their rights and turf.
/r/MensRights31/07/10 05:44 PM
1

Why do "women's rights" win on all fronts, ridiculing all due process and legal restraints? Very interesting article trying to give one coherent explanation why men's interest get trampled in unimaginable ways, as described in reddit's "Men's rights" pages. Basically the article says that women are great manipulators, so great that lawmakers all over the world and even United Nations re-define "child" (nowadays up to 17 years) and "rape" (nowadays consensual sex with 17 year olds or even fondlin…
/r/MensRights29/07/10 08:28 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter