TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

curious_bi-winning Archive

View 0 posts and 60 comments by curious_bi-winning on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I read recently from author mark manson that climate change and increased co2 levels are possibly to blame for increased weight as wild animals are also gaining weight. With that being said, I wonder if a country like japan has seen weight gain.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/21 12:01 AM
2

What a way to appreciate your service! Geez. Another example of a good deed being punished.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 04:38 AM
2

I've read that RTs are not paid enough for the responsibility they carry and I see you truly had to do more with less. What work are you in now?
/r/MensRights14/03/21 04:38 AM
2

Is there a website or resource to apply through that you used? I just don't know what's credible online.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 11:07 PM
4

I figured covid would have changed things up for you. My nearby college also has cardiovascular technician I was considering. I had not considered nursing since I feel I would not fit in as well as a guy. I've read many statements by nurses that they don't get respect and get overworked and are understaffed to the point of looking for work elsewhere. I don't know if it's a different experience between an advanced nurse vs registered. I'm sorry about the death part. I respect anyone who can handl…
/r/MensRights13/03/21 11:03 PM
3

I was considering respiratory or cardio tech. What was boring about respiratory? I considered trades but I am slightly more attuned to working with people than things or ideas.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 09:12 PM
2

What qualifications do you need to have to teach there? Also, is virtual teaching becoming more common as an option?
/r/MensRights19/10/20 07:13 PM
9

Was your experience taking place in a big city? Just wondering if a girl is more willing to go to an apartment downtown in big city than a house in a rural area.
/r/MensRights03/10/20 11:34 AM
1

Apparently in Louisiana, "carnal Knowledge" is another way of saying "statutory rape.": http://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/louisiana-statutory-rape-laws.htm So, in this instance, the women are actually being charged with rape, which is unusual.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/14 05:19 AM
2

i read that whole article, too...you have to scroll down. I was waiting and thinking very hard how the writer was going to segue into Gosling from talking about Gupta and sugar.
/r/MensRights06/04/12 06:28 PM
1

Yeah it was uncomfortable for me to read about her equating a pre-determined, structured role in a story with her being saved in real time without any planning. "I'm sorry being saved is boring for you and you couldn't take on a more prominent role in saving yourself. I know dying our being seriousyl injured would've been more dramatic and interesting, but I hope you forgive Ryan and everyone else for thinking otherwise."
/r/MensRights06/04/12 06:26 PM
1

I actually agree with you, and that's what i meant to portray. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 02:18 AM
0

People should not worry about whether strangers will find something offensive. Someone everywhere is going to find something offensive in what one does or says no matter what. "I'm offended" means nothing to me as it usually just seeks to cut off discourse and instead tries to allow emotional appeals into the discussion. You really need to be more clear, as well. I can't tell if you think I'm being PC or not, and I also don't know what you think I'm joking about or what you're offended by.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 10:10 PM
0

I don't understand what you mean. Also, I am no Jigglypuff. Skin made of rice paper? So I am a candy pokemon?
/r/MensRights09/02/12 05:12 PM
5

You will be taken out of context or told that your sarcastic humor is extremely offensive and in poor taste. YOU THINK RAPE IS A JOKE?!
/r/MensRights09/02/12 03:58 PM
1

she should've listened to Kanye.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 03:46 PM
1

People still had a chance to fight against negative dress codes before the economy, and they'll get a chance if the economy improves.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 04:36 PM
1

I think the difference might come down to the context of the situation, though. Would a guy potentially be more upset that a girl isn't wearing heels than a girl would be that the guy wasn't "polite" enough to give his shoes away? I think the issue of perceived manners comes into play here, and the possibility of the guy looking bad is greater in this situation, I think. The guy might not get that second date, because he looked like a jerk. The same could not be said about the girl not wearing h…
/r/MensRights04/02/12 05:44 PM
3

As long as no person is forced in either of these situations, I'm okay with it. People can choose to sacrifice or suffer if they want. People will have expectations, but it doesn't mean one has to live up to them. As far as how heels make a woman look, I guess it would enhance certain qualities, but to me it's still just a facade, and I would just hope they woudln't be doing it for me. Otherwise, they can hurt their feet all they want.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:23 PM
0

Women can blame society for the idea but not for the actual part of putting them on. In the end, they are the ones who decide, and plenty of women decide not to wear heels fortunately. Thus, if girls want to feel some pain, that's up to them. All I know is that I won't and don't encourage any girl to wear heels. I don't want anybody to suffer.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:09 PM
13

My wonder is since men aren't forcing women to wear heels, is it the women who feel they're forcing themselves or that society has this expectation of them or what? I also don't think i'ts difficult for a woman to bring an extra pair of comfortable shoes...
/r/MensRights03/02/12 11:01 PM
5

I guess the question is when would she need to? I would enjoy going shoe dutch though.
/r/MensRights03/02/12 10:57 PM
8

Unfortunately, in that thread, I fell victim to the old "Male problems should not be compared to female problems. Women have it worse!"
/r/MensRights03/02/12 10:38 PM
9

I was really worried when I opened up that thread. Surprisingly most people had common sense answers in favor of being intact. They're even spreading the article showing that circumcision is on the decline in the states: http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/17/u-s-circumcision-rates-on-the-decline/
/r/MensRights29/01/12 10:59 PM
-5

So how are these results occurring? Wouldn't the majority of sexual cases be 1 male for every 1 female having sex? Shouldn't the numbers be closer. Is it that there's more lesbian sex going on, accounting for less males and more females saying they've had sex? Also, what about the idea of males having more partners which also adds to more females having sex.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 04:28 PM
1

assuming girls mature quicker, it could happen as well in their minds as you say.
/r/MensRights17/07/11 06:37 AM
3

I agree with the fact that he could've responded in a better manner. However, your comments ignore that you were wrong, and you proceed to pull the "I'm a woman" card. Rantgrrl, the one who posted above, is also a woman, but she's upvoted, even though she's a woman. It's not right of you to play victim when you made such an erroneous claim. However, rantgrrl shouldn't have approached this from the perspective of equalizing the severity of genital mutilation for the sexes. Whether one is worse or…
/r/MensRights08/07/11 08:52 PM
1

You reposted a comment that's already been discussed a mere inches from your own
/r/MensRights30/06/11 09:58 AM
1

Then I would ask anyone not in those states. I'm not sure how I feel about your vague response as far as what your point was. I can almost envision a QED at the end of your sentence :).
/r/MensRights29/06/11 10:23 AM
5

I would ask ANYONE, "Do you think it should be legal for a child to drive a car?" "No." "So why do we let 16 year olds drive cars if they are considered a child in sexual matters. Are you saying they're capable of making an adult decision by driving a car, but they're not capable of consenting to sex?"
/r/MensRights29/06/11 06:41 AM
2

The government is protecting you from yourself and your ability to choose. You, citizen, are not capable of coming to an informed decision on this matter. Personal responsibility is fucking scary.
/r/MensRights26/06/11 06:51 PM
2

A parents' choice for their child should never be a legitimate reason in and of itself. Let's take a parent that wants to rip off the pinky toenail of a baby, because studies have shown that it reduces the need to cut the nail and to clean underneath the nail. Studies also show there's a decreased risk in the toenail becoming ingrown and requiring surgery. And, the baby will still be able to walk without that toenail, and socks and shoes can protect the flesh where the nail was originally. "I th…
/r/MensRights06/06/11 02:40 AM
3

I understand what you're saying, and it's a good point. However, it's similar to saying that murder should still be legal, because making it illegal hasn't ever eliminated it. And that's true, murder will still occur. But, murder affects others and takes away from others. Circumcision affects others and takes away from others. It's different from making alcohol illegal, because people can drink without affecting anyone else. They can make that choice as an adult as well. Infant circumcision affe…
/r/MensRights05/06/11 09:30 PM
5

People don't want it banned on infants, because most people are authoritative and controlling and don't understand the pursuit of happiness through choice. I'm intact, and the people that want it to be okay for someone to have circumcised me without my consent, well they worry me. How come it's okay to have cut me when I was an infant, but it's not okay to force me to go to a doctor now and have me circumcised? Because now I can tell you "No." Now, I can choose for myself. Essentially, one is sa…
/r/MensRights05/06/11 09:08 AM
15

No, it would be legal at adulthood with this measure.
/r/MensRights05/06/11 07:14 AM
1

You're not alone. She didn't write very clearly. It wasn't until the end that I was completely sure what her opinion and intent were.
/r/MensRights03/06/11 07:32 PM
2

Yeah, I hear you. That can be the issue with all-boys and all-girls schools. They lose that crucial interaction with the opposite sex. My ex went to an all-girls school growing up in the England. She said it made her a bit more awkward with guys, cause she lacked the experience. I understand the idea of wanting students to be better focused on their studies, but preparing them to handle mixed-gender scenarios is important. The workplace usually is not just a same-sex environment.
/r/MensRights30/05/11 02:35 AM
1

We weren't offered that in my public university. But I do like that you got a choice!
/r/MensRights29/05/11 04:34 AM
1

Was this private or public college? I was on a hall that had both genders but not in the same dorm room or apartment-style dorm.
/r/MensRights29/05/11 01:22 AM
2

That's true. With like-minded individuals, they wouldn't be hurt financially. On the other hand, it wouldn't mean more open-minded competition in the public and private sector would not exist already at that point and be able to increase over time. I wonder how long it will take to make particular religions more accepting of people. I would think that with owners who are afraid of gays currently, if they hold such strong opinions, they still are not renting out to gays even if the law says it's …
/r/MensRights28/05/11 11:56 PM
2

This is a good point, definitely. I would hope that in today's society, if it were reported (on the news, through the community) that an owner of several complexes was denying a certain group, other citizens not of that group would boycott the place and instead promote another complex that caters to everyone. That owner now has all of the members of the group that were previously denied and has profited from not discriminating. I would also think there would/could exist public housing which woul…
/r/MensRights28/05/11 10:48 PM
1

"You can't reason someone out of that which they weren't reasoned into." Laws made by illogical humans won't necessarily change the beliefs and behaviors of other humans that are illogical. People discriminate all the time, despite what the law says. The law says all of these drugs are illegal and bad, yet it doesn't stop people. Hell, even when everyone knows about the harmful effects of legal cigarettes, people still take up smoking in high school or college (like my friends). That, particular…
/r/MensRights28/05/11 10:34 PM
2

Not every libertarian believes the same things or to the same degree. I'm sure whether you're a Democrat, Republican, or something else, you know they don't all represent your views. Regarding discrimination, that woman could just rent to only her limited amount of male & female friends and rent to no one else. That would exclude far more people from an opportunity than if she just discriminated against one sex. Yet, this is still legal. My point is that property rights and discrimination aren't…
/r/MensRights28/05/11 10:13 PM
0

At what point do you feel a mixing of genders is too much. For example, how do you feel about mixed genders in dorm rooms or apartment-style dorm rooms? Should this be an option? edit: As in, both genders sharing a dorm room or apartment-style dorm. I know you're for mixing the genders, but I just want to know how far you think one should go with it.
/r/MensRights28/05/11 09:58 PM
1

Do you feel that single-gender dorm rooms/apartment-style dorms of mixed-gender colleges are ridiculous? If we took it a step further than residence halls and looked at the actual rooms being mixed, would that make more sense for a mixed-gender college? In this scenario, should roommates be the same gender? Also, with apartment-style dorms, should the girls be on one side (A & B) and share their bathroom and the guys on the other (C & D) who share their own bathroom as well? I just wonder where …
/r/MensRights28/05/11 09:55 PM
1

I don't think a private school that caters to one race would survive in this time period. One call to the news station and this place would be tainted along with anyone involved. Now, discrimination based on sex definitely will survive. All-girls and all-boys schools still exist. Should it survive? That's always interesting to discuss. But students aren't forced to attend these private schools or public schools (besides by their parents..), so there's a choice that suits people's wants without a…
/r/MensRights28/05/11 09:15 PM
1

It would seem one can prevent discrimination in theory but not always in practice. Thinking about it, she's discriminating against more people by just choosing her friends (unless she's Tom from Myspace), rather than just discriminating against one sex. Yet, it's still legal even if it's more discriminatory. Should we then say that to combat this discrimination, everyone should be entitled a chance to become her friend? That can't be enforced, and friendship criteria can be conflicting: If I'm C…
/r/MensRights28/05/11 08:55 PM
4

Taking one anthropology class is enough to learn that these terms have been used interchangeably but were originally different. "Sex" was the biological aspect of a person, while "gender" was a social construct that works on a spectrum and is influenced by societal norms. So, you're right.
/r/MensRights28/05/11 05:47 PM
3

The only problem with that scenario is I can't figure out who the person would be to notice the trend and report it, assuming she's giving interviews to men and women. I suppose the only way to do it would be to set up fake potential renters and then notice a trend that way. But who will be responsible for this? Is this done in the present time? If it's not done, I don't know how she would be caught, except by being so blatant in an email. I have another question. Would it be illegal discriminat…
/r/MensRights28/05/11 05:23 PM
2

My error was in not saying why I think mentioning downvoting is inappropriate. To begin, it already conflicts with my inherent choice. He should not be telling me to do that which he really doesn't want me to do. The reverse psychology of it is unnecessary and it's premature to think we would even downvote him in the first place. It also furthers a self-fulfilling prophecy, and I don't think one should cater to that. I guess instead of downvoting him, one can just reply that one is not going to …
/r/MensRights28/05/11 07:35 AM
2

I would've been curious to see why she doesn't, so that it would've given you the chance to refute any sort of generalizations she was probably going to throw out. People like that need to be conversed with to show them their fallacies. But you were pretty clever, regardless.
/r/MensRights28/05/11 07:24 AM
10

She could just get around it by interviewing the men and rejecting every man she interviews. It would still lead to the same conclusion and still be legal (she would also be rejecting all the women who didn't get chosen). Although I agree with thebestwes, you're right in that the law should be followed. However, this shouldn't limit discussion of whether this particular part of the law is necessary these days...just like whether pot being illegal is necessary. I follow the law and have never smo…
/r/MensRights28/05/11 07:08 AM
7

I guess you don't really know they're psycho until after the fact. Reminds me of "I never thought our neighbor could possibly have committed murder. She seemed like such a nice lady."
/r/MensRights27/05/11 02:32 AM
2

So I'm going to assume parents should also be able to cut off the clitoral hood, too? Do you want to be consistent? You're comparing voting and driving to something that only affects the baby, even though they're the only person that does not have a say. The most logical thing you can do is assume the baby wants to keep what they came with. Why? Because, when they get older, like me, and would never dream of getting a circumcision, they look back at their parents and feel grateful. However, if t…
/r/MensRights25/05/11 05:34 PM
7

Female genital mutilation is still practiced as tradition in parts of Africa, and it's not done on purpose by women in these cases. There is not an overwhelming amount of medical advantages. A quick search shows that there is not a consensus. I guess cutting someone's sensitive skin against their will is a stupid, non-issue. I can't argue with someone who doesn't understand the most basic rights of a human being.
/r/MensRights25/05/11 09:42 AM
12

Then it's a boy's right rather than a man's right. It's an equality issue when you consider nobody's cutting out the clitoral hood of a baby girl. This is an issue that is much easier to stop than murder by mothers. But despite whether one is easier to get rid of over the other, they can both exist in this subreddit. I don't even want children, and I still think this is a very important issue for the fact that it can be stopped immediately if people came to their senses. Then we can worry about …
/r/MensRights25/05/11 08:32 AM
5

Done, thanks!
/r/MensRights25/05/11 08:22 AM
7

Is it so hard to wait for the boy to grow up and decide for himself if he wants to be circumcised? Preventing the mutilation of another person's body trumps allowing tradition. Female genital mutilation is tradition in parts of Africa. Doesn't make it right. I feel so good about the fact that I'm intact. No one has taken away my natural level of pleasure and nerve endings or my protection (I don't even need lube to masturbate).
/r/MensRights21/05/11 04:46 PM
1

I learned of it through Ben Folds. I know, it should've been through Dre. Either way, it's a damn good cover.
/r/MensRights21/05/11 03:52 PM
6

Until circumcision goes out of fashion, I don't know if we're really civilized.
/r/MensRights14/05/11 09:15 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter