~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Infidelity double standardAge, which is a significant factor for this is missing. I don't really like posts like this because they can be severely misleading. Specifically, when they don't state the exact question, they were asking. Also, this information is quite meaningless if men answered similarly, which is also absent from here. | /r/MensRights | 28/07/23 12:35 PM |
| 2 | The reason men get paid more than women for the 'same' job.Who said it was a job? I explicitly explained to you that this video is not literally dealing with jobs. But metaphorically it's easily paralleled to the wage gap hypothesis. | /r/MensRights | 17/12/22 04:29 PM |
| 1 | The reason men get paid more than women for the 'same' job.I'm truly shocked that this needs to be explained. This is an allegory, not a literal statement I'm making. It's obvious this is not part of the job description and it's pretty much stated in the video. The point is, they both take the ice bucket challenge and they can write "took bucket challenge" on their resume yet one of them had a significantly more challenging, challenge. Similarly, if two people are doing the same "job" for example Chef in a restaurant. It doesn't mean that they put in th… | /r/MensRights | 17/12/22 03:10 PM |
| 1 | Discussion: Not all menIt is different though. We could bring up police brutality and how white men and women are treated by police than black men and women. This has nothing to do with the issue at hand and you're moving the goalpost. The question before you is: "Why is it unreasonable for you to be five times more cautious around a red person than a green person if red people attacked you five times more than green people?" It's a simple question that you're trying to wiggle away from by invoking unrelated things. | /r/MensRights | 27/01/22 07:12 AM |
| 1 | Discussion: Not all menThat’s like saying since some Muslims are terrorists and have committed crimes we should be cautious and watch the ones in stores so they don’t blow the store up. Yes. It's exactly like that. Where is the problem here? If green people have a 5% chance to blow up your store and red people have a 1% to blow up your store (Or in other words, green people are five times more likely to blow up your store than red people) then why is it strange that you're five times more suspicious of green people th… | /r/MensRights | 26/01/22 11:10 AM |
| 2 | Discussion: Not all menAgain, your scenario is so unrealistic It’s hard to compare a real current event that happeneds a lot to a made up one that doesn’t ( or very rarely ) and call them equal. It has nothing to do with realism. It has to do with the logic you're applying. The comparison is not between the events, it's between the logic. And if you change the logic, it means you don't apply it consistently and then it means it's flawed. In other words, if you say that a manager telling a security guard to follow an u… | /r/MensRights | 26/01/22 08:00 AM |
| 1 | Discussion: Not all menYou’re a racist manager in a store and you tell someone to follow a black man that’s not doing anything suspicious at all? Pretty f-ed What if your store was robbed every week by a black man? Your store was robbed 10 times, and 10 out of 10 times it was by a black man, Are you not justified in being more cautious when a black man walks into your store? (And by 'cautious' I mean telling the security guard to keep an eye on said man.) If I'm a car insurance company, and I know that statistically r… | /r/MensRights | 26/01/22 07:42 AM |
| 5 | Discussion: Not all menWhat is the significance of it being a “muslim” man though? Its not like them being muslim had anything to do with the lead up to harassing someone. There are many factors that cause specifically men to have a pattern of harrassing/assaulting women What makes you think that there aren't many factors that cause specifically Muslim men to have a significantly stronger pattern of harassing/assaulting women? How come 'men' in general have "things ingrained into them from ‘society’" and those ingrain… | /r/MensRights | 26/01/22 07:32 AM |
| 2 | Discussion: Not all menWe're not talking about shooting anyone. We're talking about feeling uneasy. | /r/MensRights | 26/01/22 07:14 AM |
| 4 | Discussion: Not all menI think that you raise fine points, but just to clarify, I wasn't responding to the idea of broadcasting "all men are rapists" in schools or something like that. In my mind, the question was confined internally. As in, in my head asking myself. Am I justified saying something like "I'm more concerned for my safety when I'm around men I don't know than when I'm around women I don't know?" Not as a public statement or something that needs to be an official policy, but just asking myself, in my own… | /r/MensRights | 25/01/22 08:35 PM |
| 0 | Discussion: Not all mendespite the downvotes People don't like hearing things they disagree with, even if they make sense. It's a common issue. What makes you think it's 'total bullshit' though? If you agree that Being grabbed by someone stronger than you is worse than being grabbed by someone weaker than you. Men on average are stronger than women. And let's say that women grab men as much as men grab women, then it just mathematically follows that if you choose a random M2F grabbing and F2M grabbing, that M2F grabbi… | /r/MensRights | 25/01/22 05:38 PM |
| 8 | Discussion: Not all menI think it’s very valid to be in some ways afraid / cautious after getting raped from the opposite gender. Just as it is valid to be afraid/ cautious of black people if you were mugged by black people. Though this thought isn't as wildly shared in progressive circles. | /r/MensRights | 25/01/22 05:29 PM |
| -4 | Discussion: Not all menExcept in this analogy, cakes are men. So you're saying that it's better to never be in a relationship, or date a woman? No. I'm saying it's a bad analogy because giving up cake is not equivalent to living your life alone and having no kids. Never said that physical is less than emotional. You did say that I'm implying that men are worth less than women because I stated that physical assault is worse than emotional. It's a real shame you've gone down the route of essentially saying that men don'… | /r/MensRights | 25/01/22 02:14 PM |
| -16 | Discussion: Not all menBecause statistically, to eat a poisoned cake, I'd have to eat 333,333 cakes. That's how that maths works. You really gonna say that 1 in 333,333 is a big risk? Yes, it is. It is in fact an infinitely bigger risk than not eating a cake. It is a low chance, but why take it if you can avoid it? You don't have to eat cakes, you can eat cookies, chocolates other things. If you know 1 in 333333 cakes is poison, why not avoid them? But just because someone is physically able to overpower you, that doe… | /r/MensRights | 25/01/22 12:40 PM |
| -15 | Discussion: Not all men"If you're given access to a cake factory, and told that 0.03% of the cakes manufactured at this cake factory contain poison, would you eat any cakes?" Because I know I would. Why would you? A chance of 0.03% to eat a cake seems like a high price. I think it would be completely reasonable to avoid the cakes. I think the issue here isn't denying that some men should be avoided. When I walk down a dark alley at night and I see a strange man, I feel more threatened than if I see a strange woman. I … | /r/MensRights | 25/01/22 11:58 AM |
| 136 | Discussion: Not all menI find it extremely amusing that the very same people who say the argument "I was previously harassed and assaulted by men, so now I'm more cautious and suspicious of men in general" is perfectly reasonable, but if you narrow it down to a specific group of men. Such as "I was harassed by Muslim men, so now I'm more cautious and suspicious of Muslim men." will say you're a crazy racist. Being suspicious of all men is fine, but being suspicious of a subset of men is a crime against humanity. Even … | /r/MensRights | 25/01/22 11:45 AM |
| 3 | Another GEM by UN WOMEN👇Imagine a woman living on her own. She does her own laundry, cleans her own apartment, goes shopping for groceries, cooks, takes out the trash etc. This is 'unpaid care work' who the fuck should pay you for cleaning your own home or cooking for yourself? | /r/MensRights | 13/10/21 05:57 PM |
| 1 | bruhI have no idea what you're saying and how feminism has anything to do with it. | /r/MensRights | 19/03/21 06:47 PM |
| 1 | bruhWell, if a person is falsely accused of rape. Then he is the victim. | /r/MensRights | 19/03/21 06:41 PM |
| 1 | bruhThis sub: "Falsely accusing someone of rape is bad." u/jumboelephant428: "you lame if you really believe this shit jesus christ you are all clowns 🤡" | /r/MensRights | 19/03/21 06:32 PM |
| 5 | So I read about it somewhereI have no idea that that is. | /r/MensRights | 15/03/21 03:40 PM |
| 12 | So I read about it somewhereAre the MRA subreddits listed as hate subreddits? I think so. And if so why? It's much easier to discredit someone by saying "This person posts on a hate subreddit" than to actually engage with an argument. | /r/MensRights | 15/03/21 03:26 PM |
| 57 | Anti "Not All Men" post on r/feminism comparing men to ticks. This is unbelievable. The comments are even worse.Funny how in their opinion this works for 'men' but doesn't work for any other sub-group, like 'Muslims, 'Black people, 'Gay people', 'trans people', etc... For instance, if you say "Muslims are misogynists" /r/feminism would lose their shit, even if you show surveys and other statistical evidence to that effect. Why do they lose their shit? Because NOT ALL Muslims are misogynists and it's bad to generalize about groups of people. You shouldn't assume how people behave based on a stereotype unle… | /r/MensRights | 15/03/21 09:52 AM |
| 2 | Women have much MUCH worse standards than men, men are not compared to other people like celebrity's6 is above average, which puts one on the positive end of the attractiveness scale. A 6 is more attractive than 60% of people Yeah, and men who aren't fat or bald are also 6s. However female 6's have far more options than male 6's when it comes to dating and sex. Like what exactly? Makeup? I've yet to see a hot girl who didn't look good without it. This is exactly my point. Attractive women look good without makeup too. However if you're a 6 makeup can get you to 7. It helps you compete against … | /r/MensRights | 13/01/21 02:59 PM |
| 3 | Women have much MUCH worse standards than men, men are not compared to other people like celebrity'sAnd 6 isn't' that high. Like a lot of things in life, attractiveness is normally distributed. There are very few 1's and 10's and the majority of people are 4's,5's and 6's. 6 isn't attractive. 6 is slightly above average. If a woman (Or a man) wants to be an 8 or 9 they need to do a whole lot more than not be fat or have a six pack. (Obviously a lot of the time, there isn't really much they can do and it's down to genetics.) | /r/MensRights | 13/01/21 02:27 PM |
| 7 | Women have much MUCH worse standards than men, men are not compared to other people like celebrity's"Six pack is nothing compared to what women are compared to". Just like it isn't true to say that a woman just doesn't have to be fat to be considered attractive. It's equally false to say that all a man has to do is to have a six-pack to be attractive. (Though it's objectively harder to have a six-pack than just not being fat) Plus, women aren't really compared to movie actresses and Instagram models in the sense of 'If she isn't as good looking as Alice Eve, then I won't even consider dating h… | /r/MensRights | 13/01/21 01:25 PM |
| 13 | PUSH FOR FEMALE EQUALITY?Should this sub be more active in pushing for issues that effect women so that we aren't guilty of the same thing? But 'men rights advocates' aren't pretending to be advocating for everyone, as feminists do. It's a men's interest group. Just like feminists is a women's interest group. But feminists like to say, that they care about men's and women's issues equally, which is just a blatant lie. | /r/MensRights | 04/01/21 12:20 AM |
| 2 | I don't understand why MRA are a thing, I mean, feminism does fight for a lot of male issues, aswell.That's the thing, they aren't anti-men Who is 'they' you refer to in this sentence? Feminism isn't a monolithic movement. Some feminists are definitely anti-men. And a lot of the sentiments we hear in popular media are anti-men as well. For instance, we hear about the pay gap constantly in the media. But we don't hear about the gap workplace-related deaths. If you take the amount of time feminists has dedicated on reporting and talking about the 'gender pay gap' versus the amount of time dedicat… | /r/MensRights | 19/12/20 08:22 PM |
| 5 | I don't understand why MRA are a thing, I mean, feminism does fight for a lot of male issues, aswell.It's like if I say me and my friends are starting a fat acceptance movement (let's call it 'slimism') and we fight for fat people's rights. But all we actually do is talk about how fat people inconvenience us. We'll coin a term such as 'toxic fatness'. And say one facet of 'toxic fatness' is when you point out to a fat person they are blocking a passage and they get upset and start yelling at you. Another term is 'fat spreading' it's when a fat person takes more than one seat in public transport… | /r/MensRights | 19/12/20 08:10 PM |
| 3 | What my boyfriend thinks about MRM.I really don't see your point. There are plenty of children that need things to live. And those things need to be provided by their parents. How does it make sense in your head to force someone who is not the child's parent to pay for the child? I mean, why don't you personally pay child support to Jenny instead of Dave? If your point is 'well we need to think about the welfare of the child' then fair enough. You, personally need to pitch in too. Why does only Dave need to do it? | /r/MensRights | 11/11/20 07:20 PM |
| 2 | What my boyfriend thinks about MRM.This point can certainly be made. This policy may very well be pro-child. But it doesn't mean it isn't unjust. For instance, why no obligate an ex-boyfriend of any woman who is a single parent to pay child support? What I mean is... If a woman gets pregnant and the father is gone. Why not just go down the chain of boyfriends she had and obligate the first one you find to pay her child support? This is a pro-child policy. But it has nothing to do with justice. | /r/MensRights | 11/11/20 02:56 PM |
| 3 | What my boyfriend thinks about MRM.I think you're right and it is relevant in this case. Given MRA's negative reputation especially among women, it is relevant that the question was asked by a woman. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/20 12:35 AM |
| 93 | What my boyfriend thinks about MRM.But I thought you guys would find it interesting to hear what a progressive man believes MRA to be about. There is nothing really surprising in what he says... It pretty much echos the usual slander talking points against MRA's. They are worried about non-issues. They unconsciously or consciously hate women. They are afraid of women taking over their power. They are losers who can't get a girlfriend. I wonder... If a man called Dave is married to a woman named Jenny. And then Jenny cheats on him… | /r/MensRights | 10/11/20 12:28 AM |
| 1 | Just doing a little experimentI would stay neutral in terms of convicting a person. If I was on a jury and no other evidence was presented. I would have been neutral. IE I would say that the prosecution didn't make its case. But if no other evidence exists and you ask me, what is more likely that a man raped a woman or the other way around. My answer would be the former. Because it's demonstrably true. | /r/MensRights | 24/10/20 11:46 PM |
| 3 | Just doing a little experimentMen are bigger and stronger than women. The majority of rapes are male on female. So statistically speaking if no other information is available, I would bet the woman is telling the truth. But I would not think it's impossible that it's the other way around. Just less likely. It's like if a man and a woman each say they are software engineers. Whom will I believe if the parameter of the question is that one of them must be lying? I would bet on the man. Just because the vast majority of softwar… | /r/MensRights | 24/10/20 11:38 PM |
| 1 | White Knights at /r/ProgrammingHumor downvoted me to HELL for saying that being excited to talk to a female programmer online does not a harasser make.Could you elaborate? I lost you a bit. | /r/MensRights | 24/10/20 07:33 PM |
| 1 | White Knights at /r/ProgrammingHumor downvoted me to HELL for saying that being excited to talk to a female programmer online does not a harasser make.r/MensRights is not your personal army, I don't see this as a issue that pertains to this subreddit. You don't see how pulling the trigger too quickly and calling something harassment when it isn't is relevant? Not knowing full context leaves you at a loss for explanations. Fair enough. Though don't you think that the person making the accusation should provide the full context if it isn't favorable to the accused? If there is context missing my assumption is that the accused didn't do anything … | /r/MensRights | 23/10/20 02:48 PM |
| 1 | White Knights at /r/ProgrammingHumor downvoted me to HELL for saying that being excited to talk to a female programmer online does not a harasser make.Perhaps you're right. However don't you think there is a significant difference between finding something annoying and claiming this something is harassment. | /r/MensRights | 23/10/20 12:45 PM |
| 1 | White Knights at /r/ProgrammingHumor downvoted me to HELL for saying that being excited to talk to a female programmer online does not a harasser make.Seems like a very accurate description. | /r/MensRights | 23/10/20 10:16 AM |
| 1 | White Knights at /r/ProgrammingHumor downvoted me to HELL for saying that being excited to talk to a female programmer online does not a harasser make.They say it's just harassment, not sexual harassment in a legal sense so they don't have to be working together for that. But still, harassment is something that repeats. And once she told him it's not his business he immediately stopped and apologized. | /r/MensRights | 23/10/20 10:16 AM |
| 2 | White Knights at /r/ProgrammingHumor downvoted me to HELL for saying that being excited to talk to a female programmer online does not a harasser make.Unwanted sexual attention is sexual harassment No. Repeat unwanted sexual attention is sexual harassment. No, you would think he was coming on to you, and not even in a subtle way. YES! This is my whole point. He's obviously coming on to her, but coming on to you is not sexual harassment. | /r/MensRights | 23/10/20 10:14 AM |
| 1 | White Knights at /r/ProgrammingHumor downvoted me to HELL for saying that being excited to talk to a female programmer online does not a harasser make.Another well adjusted person. Hello. | /r/MensRights | 22/10/20 07:17 PM |
| 3 | White Knights at /r/ProgrammingHumor downvoted me to HELL for saying that being excited to talk to a female programmer online does not a harasser make.Usually people on that sub are quite reasonable. | /r/MensRights | 22/10/20 05:49 PM |
| 7 | Hello! I’m a feminist joining the subreddit just to see some of the issues you all are being up.Greetings! I hope you have a good time here. As for /r/feminism. I wouldn't hold your breath. They delete posts and ban everyone who doesn't agree with them. If you read between the lines their sub rules it basically states 'if you disagree with something we agree on. You are violating the rules.' I was banned immideatly on the first post I made there after pointing out a factual mistake in a video they posted about Jordan Peterson. Also, I wouldn't be surprised if they just autoban anyone who p… | /r/MensRights | 08/10/20 07:42 PM |
| 21 | Aside from being a mental health condition, body dysmorphia is openly used to control or belittle men.It seems this is about abortion. The argument is basically if you can't experience what it's like to be a woman you can't have an opinion about things that are exclusive to women. (Like abortion rights.) This seems to make sense but it is fallacious reasoning because policy and laws aren't decided on personal experiences. For instance, non-pedophiles can't experience what pedophiles are going through. A pedophile can employ the same line of reasoning and say "A non-pedophile should not be allowe… | /r/MensRights | 01/10/20 03:28 PM |
| 23 | No Emotional Labor Is not real work. And Yes a man has felt everything she has felt in this article one time or another in different settings and it still not work.This is the part of the article that shows it has no merit: You see, my boyfriend is a scientist – when we have an argument, he wants logic, facts, and figures. He challenges me to prove that my ideas are empirical, that I have stats to back myself up. And that isn’t wrong, necessarily. But I’m an artist, a writer, and social worker, and while emotional labor certainly has been academically studied for years, I tend to understand the world through stories and my personal experiences. Basically, … | /r/MensRights | 29/09/20 11:15 AM |
| 46 | That's a weird way of saying "Give up your games and give me attention"I'm sure it's lost on the person that wrote this, but adrenalin is also produced in victims of violence. Not just the perpetrators. | /r/MensRights | 12/09/20 10:18 PM |
| 3 | This is a sub, this is disgusting.Dude, it's like a kink it doesn't mean that people actually mean it. If you'll look I'm sure you'll find subs that say the exact same thing about women. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/20 09:13 PM |
| 1 | Man labeled as pedo for complementing Greta Thunberg's selfie. [image] (instagram)English isn't my first language. How is a reasonable guess diffrent from a reasonable assumption? | /r/MensRights | 25/08/20 10:09 PM |
| 0 | Man labeled as pedo for complementing Greta Thunberg's selfie. [image] (instagram)That's what I've said. | /r/MensRights | 25/08/20 10:07 PM |
| 0 | Man labeled as pedo for complementing Greta Thunberg's selfie. [image] (instagram)it means other explanations must be improbable, or this is the likeliest explanation. No, it doesn't mean that. If you flip a coin and I say it will land on tails. It's a reasonable assumption. Even though other outcomes are not improbable and tails is not the likeliest outcome. An unreasonable assumption would be to say that the coin will turn into an eagle and fly away. | /r/MensRights | 25/08/20 06:17 PM |
| 0 | Man labeled as pedo for complementing Greta Thunberg's selfie. [image] (instagram)Do you know what the word 'reasonable' means? To say that something is reasonable doesn't mean that any other explanations are impossible. For example, it is reasonable to assume Joe Biden will win the election. Even though it might not happen. It is also reasonable to assume that Trump will win. The claim you're making is the unreasonable one. You're saying there is no way a guy saying to a girl 'you look gorgeous in that photo' with an assortment of emojis is flirting. And if a person consider… | /r/MensRights | 25/08/20 05:11 PM |
| 0 | Man labeled as pedo for complementing Greta Thunberg's selfie. [image] (instagram)Why is it unreasonable? | /r/MensRights | 25/08/20 03:34 PM |
| -1 | Man labeled as pedo for complementing Greta Thunberg's selfie. [image] (instagram)She's 17. Halfway to 18. So? What's your point? The question at hand is whether or not it's unreasonable (low IQ) to interpret this comment as flirtatious. The answer is, it's completely reasonable to think that it is. The fact that Greta is 17 and not 15 is irrelevant to this question. And pretending that an international figure like greta can be compared to a private person like your (possibly hypothetical) 15 year old daughter is ridiculous. I addressed the fact that Greta is a public figure.… | /r/MensRights | 25/08/20 03:13 PM |
| -5 | Man labeled as pedo for complementing Greta Thunberg's selfie. [image] (instagram)Dude, pump the breaks on your low IQ train. I know that if I saw a grown man messaging my 15yo daughter saying 'You look gorgeous in that selfie'. I would be highly suspicious. It's by no way a stretch to say this is a flirtatious remark and not an innocent compliment. Now, that being said, Greta is a public figure and all types of remarks are to be expected. However to claim that perceiving this remark as flirtatious is a result of low IQ is staggering. | /r/MensRights | 25/08/20 12:42 PM |
| 198 | No, in fact what we care about is male genital mutilation, male rape, sexual abuse and violence and the disgusting treatment of men in the courts and in the court of public opinion.It seems the right-hand side was taken straight from the 'strawman' part of the dictionary. And I'm aware this meant to trivialize what MRA's are worried about, but how are false rape accusations trivial? I mean if you use 'false rape accusations' in your propaganda that means to show that MRA's are essentially worried about non-issues (Unlike 'pink tax' or what the AC temperature in the office is set to) and you include 'false rape accusations' to that. This means that you actually think that t… | /r/MensRights | 23/08/20 07:17 PM |
| 3 | (video) Random people interviewed on the street struggle to name one thing men are better at, than women.I want you to state a simple fact well within the realm of scientific consensus. Indeed. That's what you want. But given the fact this has nothing to do with the point I'm making I see no reason for me to do what you want. | /r/MensRights | 12/08/20 01:59 PM |
| 3 | (video) Random people interviewed on the street struggle to name one thing men are better at, than women.Because you're UNWILLING to say certain things, even though they are true No. I'm unwilling to say certain things just because you think me not saying them is some sort of a gotcha when in fact my point is light years away from this topic. You're like those BLM bullies who force people to say "black lives matter." No. I'm not going to say something just because you want me to. And the fact that I'm not willing to indulge you doesn't mean that I think that black lives don't matter or that men and… | /r/MensRights | 12/08/20 01:03 PM |
| 3 | (video) Random people interviewed on the street struggle to name one thing men are better at, than women.I claimed that you're exactly like the people this video, and in the British Journal of Psychology study. So far, I seem to be correct. What makes you think you're correct given that I didn't utter a single statement about group differences or equality. I'll try to make it easier for you. Here are some things that men, as a group, are horrible at, compared to women as a group: Good for you. I wasn't talking about group differences. So I don't know why you constantly pivot to this argument given … | /r/MensRights | 12/08/20 12:22 PM |
| 2 | (video) Random people interviewed on the street struggle to name one thing men are better at, than women.By "those" people you mean people who point out that anecdotal evidence is not reliable source of information? Yeah... They are terrible. | /r/MensRights | 12/08/20 12:18 PM |
| 3 | (video) Random people interviewed on the street struggle to name one thing men are better at, than women.I'm still eagerly awaiting to hear how is it relevant. | /r/MensRights | 12/08/20 12:11 PM |
| 2 | (video) Random people interviewed on the street struggle to name one thing men are better at, than women.I'm confused. Do you even understand what you're saying? I said that this video isn't a proof of a general consensus among the public. You said "Haha. It's obvious it isn't. No one is assuming that" and then you come up back and say "Well, actually it is representative of a general consensus." Again. How does this have anything to do with what I've said? This is a quote from my initial comment: I'm not saying those kinds of views aren't prevalent in the general public. I'm just saying it's falla… | /r/MensRights | 12/08/20 12:10 PM |
| 5 | (video) Random people interviewed on the street struggle to name one thing men are better at, than women.Noone in this thread, or in the video, is assuming that it's a random sample. It's just funny. You tilted your post as "Random people interviewed on the street." and now you claim no one thinks those are random people interviewed on the street. Your behavior, like that of most of the people on the video, is to do everything humanly possible to avoid admitting that there are some positive things that men as a group, are better at. Really? When did my behavior exhibit such a trait? All I did was t… | /r/MensRights | 12/08/20 12:04 PM |
| 4 | (video) Random people interviewed on the street struggle to name one thing men are better at, than women.I said it's fallacious to assume this video is representative of a general consensus among the public. No one is assuming that. How do you know this? Plus, if that's true, then what's your problem? If you posted something saying 2+2=4 and I came along and said 2+2 does not equal 7. You should say "yeah sure. No one says it does" instead of arguing with me. Yet you choose the arguing route. I really don't see what your point is. Really? How am I reacting exactly like the people in the video? Name… | /r/MensRights | 12/08/20 11:26 AM |
| 9 | (video) Random people interviewed on the street struggle to name one thing men are better at, than women.It's not a scientific study, it's a video. Where did I say it was a scientific study. I said it's fallacious to assume this video is representative of a general consensus among the public. The vast majority of gender stereotypes accurately identify mean differences between the sexes. There are hundreds of peer reviewed studies which confirm this. This has nothing to do with what I'm saying. It's interesting that you're reacting exactly like the people in this video. Really? How am I reacting exa… | /r/MensRights | 12/08/20 10:54 AM |
| 6 | (video) Random people interviewed on the street struggle to name one thing men are better at, than women.I didn't say they are equally good at everything. I've said that this video purports to report about a general consensus of the public about a certain issue by saying they just approached a random set of people and this is what they said. However this is misleading because there is no way to know how many people were edited out because they didn't say what the person making the video wanted to show. | /r/MensRights | 12/08/20 10:45 AM |
| 11 | (video) Random people interviewed on the street struggle to name one thing men are better at, than women.What I'm worried about in thoese kind of clips is there is no way to know if those people are really random and representative of the general public. For all we know he might have interviewed 15 people and only those 5 he showed said what he wanted to show. I'm not saying those kinds of views aren't prevalent in the general public. I'm just saying it's fallacious to assume that this video actually proves they are. | /r/MensRights | 12/08/20 10:25 AM |
| 14 | WoMeN cAn'T bE sExIsTYou know this quote from Justified? “If you run into an asshole in the morning, you ran into an asshole. If you run into assholes all day, you're the asshole.” ... Just saying... EDIT: Looks like /u/Lion_amongst_gods beat me to it. | /r/MensRights | 31/07/20 08:29 AM |
| 1 | #BlackLivesMatter is a Men's Rights issue too, and I wanted to remind this sub of thatOh... Now I understand. I've said that 'All Lives Matter' aren't protesting because they are labeled as racist. And then you said, "But actual Nazis have been known to protest" arguing that being labeled as racist doesn't stop them from protesting. You see the problem here is that actual Nazis don't mind being seen as Nazis. While people who aren't Nazis don't want to be labeled Nazis when they aren't Nazis. | /r/MensRights | 30/07/20 06:05 PM |
| 1 | #BlackLivesMatter is a Men's Rights issue too, and I wanted to remind this sub of thatHow does that relate to anything I've said? | /r/MensRights | 30/07/20 05:54 PM |
| 1 | #BlackLivesMatter is a Men's Rights issue too, and I wanted to remind this sub of thatWhat's your point? | /r/MensRights | 30/07/20 08:22 AM |
| 1 | Welp I’ve lost respect for Elon muskI don't know anything about this case. But according to the headline alone, it seems that Elon knew her. So if it happens that a woman you know and friendly with says that she's afraid for her safety. Why should 'lose respect' for me if I try to help her? Why because she may be lying? Well clearly if he thought she was lying and there was no danger, he would not have offered to protect her. He was just trying to be a stand up dude it seems. Respect. | /r/MensRights | 24/07/20 04:42 PM |
| 1 | Welp I’ve lost respect for Elon muskWelp I’ve lost respect for Elon musk Why? | /r/MensRights | 24/07/20 04:33 PM |
| 8 | Is the consensus here that men are the social minority & women are the social majority?Is the consensus here that men are the social minority & women are the social majority? No. Aren't men socially privileged over women? In some areas they are. In some areas, women are privileged over men. The most obvious example of this is child custody hearings, but also, work-related deaths are about 90% male. Men are the majority of victims of violent crimes. Men are also the majority of homeless people. This list goes on and on. Another obvious instance in which men get the shorter end of t… | /r/MensRights | 03/07/20 01:41 PM |
| 1 | Mags Visaggio Accuses Sean Gordon Murphy of Nothinglisten to a delusional rent I will not watch the video What are you talking about? and judging by the comments its the accused that "didnt give the accuser carreer opportunities" and the accuser is acting all petty cuz of that I don't understand your point. Yes, this is the whole point of the video. Thanks for pointing it out, I will now actively avoid that person's video Do what you want man. However, this doesn't flow logically from what you said. | /r/MensRights | 02/07/20 05:27 PM |
| 1 | Mags Visaggio Accuses Sean Gordon Murphy of NothingIt doesn't particularly matter who the accused or the accuser is. The point here is to highlight the ridiculous accusations that amount to absolutely nothing and yet are made with brazen disregard to the accused livelihood. | /r/MensRights | 02/07/20 04:33 PM |
| 2 | Big Tech Is Censoring Our Right To Freedom Of SpeechUse Bitchute. | /r/MensRights | 30/06/20 09:26 PM |
| 40 | /r/MensRights at the Reddit Content PolicyFirst off, for all those saying "muh free speech!" Reddit is not a government. You do not have "free speech" rights on Reddit and you never did. Freedom of speech does not mean "freedom from social consequences". It means freedom from oppression from a government for the things you say. You're right. Reddit is a private company and they can enforce whatever rules they feel like. However, saying 'Reddit limiting speech using draconian measures is an extremely bad idea.' is a legitimate criticism … | /r/MensRights | 30/06/20 04:08 PM |
| 0 | Correct me if I’m wrong, but I’m sure I have read several studies/articles stating that men are at a risk of getting assaulted equally. What do you guys think about such guys?What's your point though? My argument is that being afraid to jog at night is more of an issue to attractive females than males. You said it isn't. I just don't see how what you said here supports your claim. | /r/MensRights | 29/06/20 12:59 PM |
| 2 | Correct me if I’m wrong, but I’m sure I have read several studies/articles stating that men are at a risk of getting assaulted equally. What do you guys think about such guys?Citing the stat that men are overwhelmingly more likely to be a victim of a violent crime is a bit disingenuous. It just takes the overall number of violent crime and looks at whom the victim is without taking anything else into account. This is just like the 'wage gap' is calculated. You take all the wages of men and the wages of women and divided them respectfully without taking anything else into consideration. A considerable chunk of violent crime is gang violence and altercations between me… | /r/MensRights | 29/06/20 12:44 PM |
| 27 | Correct me if I’m wrong, but I’m sure I have read several studies/articles stating that men are at a risk of getting assaulted equally. What do you guys think about such guys?If I was a chick especially an attractive one (Let's be real) I wouldn't have that luxury. That's bullshit. Not that if he was a chick he wouldn't have to worry about his safety. But the la-la land he lives in that he doesn't worry about his safety right now. Obviously, as a woman, it's scary to walk alone at night in a bad area. But guess what? When I go home at night through a tough area I'm not feeling particularly safe too. And when I see someone else, I cross to the other side of the road. … | /r/MensRights | 27/06/20 07:00 PM |
| 1 | #BlackLivesMatter is a Men's Rights issue too, and I wanted to remind this sub of thatI don't see ANY marches, protests, or anything from "All Lives Matter" for anyone. Maybe it has something to do with equating anyone who says "all lives matter" to white supremacists and bigots. Though you're right that they didn't do it before. I fail to see your point though. You say: " I do see cherry picked deaths from people like you in an attempt to discredit BLM." I'm discrediting BLM not by cherry picking deaths. But by pointing out that BLM are cherry picking deaths. That's my whole poi… | /r/MensRights | 24/06/20 07:15 PM |
| 1 | #BlackLivesMatter is a Men's Rights issue too, and I wanted to remind this sub of thatReally? When was the march for Tony Timpa? I missed that one. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/20 04:54 PM |
| 1 | Why is this sub “black listed”?A lot of discussions on this sub run awful of axiomatical mainstream narratives that fall apart if scrutinized. When your narrative can't hold up to scrutiny the best tactic is to smear anyone who tries to scrutinize it as a hateful, malicious bigot. So anyone who looks at 'the wage gap' with a critical eye says "Wait a minute, if women make 70¢ for every 1$ a man makes for doing exactly the same job. Why don't companies who only care about the bottom line hire women only and save 30% on the wag… | /r/MensRights | 19/06/20 08:36 AM |
| 2 | Apparently we don't know what sexism is now! *shrug*Sadly it's effective way of smearing and silencing. "I can't counter your argument because you made a good point. I better go through your post history and find something "bad" you've said. Or find you participate in one of the 'bad' subs. And then I win, no matter if I couldn't counter your argument." There's even browser addons that paint your name red if you have too much positive karma in subs they deem 'bad'. So the user of such an addon can comfortably stick their head in the sand and igno… | /r/MensRights | 16/06/20 11:43 PM |
| 2 | Apparently we don't know what sexism is now! *shrug*I love it how some people think that pointing out that you post on a certain sub is somehow a counter-argument. | /r/MensRights | 16/06/20 11:33 PM |
| 4 | #BlackLivesMatter is a Men's Rights issue too, and I wanted to remind this sub of thatOf these six scenarios I wrote, how many of them were black men killed by cops? Half, while the rest were white, and police reform is absolutely necessary because of this bullshit, which is the primary goal of #BLM. No. #BLM only care about police violence when the cop is white and the victim is black. This makes their view of the problem skewed. Which in turn makes their proposed solutions at worse ineffective or even detrimental as a whole and at best only fix a small subset of the problem. BL… | /r/MensRights | 16/06/20 08:51 PM |
| 21 | Say his name sickos.I googled some of those names. Tyisha Miller was killed in 1979. That's 41 years ago. Laura Nelson was killed in 1911. That's 109 years ago. Annually, the number of people shot by the police (the vast majority of whom are men) is about 1000. They scoured history dating back more than 100 years. And ended up with a list of 100 names. Which are about 10% of police shooting fatalities in a single year. Since 2010 it's just 1%. Also, annually the amount of white people shot by police is double the a… | /r/MensRights | 03/06/20 10:33 PM |
| 5 | Men don't care about false rape allegationsMuslims don't care about being falsely accused of being terrorists. If they were they were, their women would not wear a hijab. They would volunteer for 'random' inspections by the police and airport security. Their children would have stopped bringing bomb-shaped clocks to school. But they don't care about being falsely accused of being a terrorist, they're just afraid they won't get away with being a terrorist anymore. So they make 'Islamaphobia' sound like a real problem in society so that wh… | /r/MensRights | 03/06/20 12:42 PM |
| 2 | I'm literally going to fucking puke.Acceptable: Some men had treated you bad so it's OK to be angry, to hate, and to fight back against men in general. Not Acceptable: Some Muslims are terrorists, so it's OK to be angry, to hate, and to fight back against Muslims in general. | /r/MensRights | 28/05/20 11:40 AM |
| 0 | These feminists are insane and hypocrites.go educate yourself on this topic before immediately jumping into the fray please. On what issue do you think I require education? My reply was specific to this post and this person. Not women or feminists in general, yet you send me to be 'educated' about what feminists in general do. Ironically in the same comment where you say that generalizing and extrapolating bad behavior of individuals to the whole group, is bad. What I said was: "If a person sends dick pics to people who don't want to se… | /r/MensRights | 25/05/20 06:43 PM |
| 6 | These feminists are insane and hypocrites.Care to explain the downvotes? Can we not acknowledge that sending dick pics to people who don't want to see them is an asinine behavior? | /r/MensRights | 25/05/20 12:58 PM |
| 3 | These feminists are insane and hypocrites.I understand this is hypocrisy as far as the feminist stance on body-shaming is concerned, but it seems this is a response to someone who complained about receiving unwanted dick pictures. In which case dick shaming seems perfectly reasonable to me. | /r/MensRights | 25/05/20 12:02 PM |
| 3 | Jokes about killing men are funny, but jokes about killing women is misogyny.Dude... Saying 'OK dude' to a transgender person is a ban-worthy violation on Twitter. Yet #killallmen is just a joke... For the record, I don't think she should be banned. But rules should be applied universally. | /r/MensRights | 14/05/20 06:37 PM |
| 28 | Haha yes. Because saying one person has parental issues equates to all men traumatising their daughtersHutchinson-Gilford Progeria is one of the rarest genetic disorders known to science. More often referred to as Progeria, this disease affects about one in every 8 million children and, due to a genetic mutation, causes the appearance of rapid aging beginning in early childhood. Symptoms often include baldness, a large head relative to their body size, limited range of motion, and most tragically, a hardening of the arteries in many cases -- which increases the chance of heart attack or stroke. I… | /r/MensRights | 14/05/20 02:50 PM |
| 21 | Feminists now want to be treated as if they have the same intelligence as a dog. Empowering!What a load of nonsense... First of all, abused dogs don't fear men, if anything they fear people. Second, "Since you are a human being, they believe you are to blame for anything that has been done to you." This is just demonstrably false. Let's talk about popular culture reference that everyone knows. Sansa Stark from Game of Thrones. She was raped, beaten, and abused. I don't know of a single person man who would say: "It's her own damn fault... screw her." Or say: "She isn't a dog, so it's h… | /r/MensRights | 03/05/20 01:30 PM |
| 61 | Reading the comments hurts internally even though it's a satire sub I cant tell any moreIt's funny how feminists are completely fine with broad generalizations when it suits their narrative, yet get absolutely livid when the generalization goes against them. For instance, here we see statistics that point out that men are responsible for the majority of violent crimes. (Which is true) And the conclusion that is drawn is men are naturally more violent than women. However, if you look at a statistic with a similar distribution between males and females, for example, 90% of engineers … | /r/MensRights | 25/03/20 02:55 PM |
| 1 | Bill Burr is the biggest and loudest voice in the mainstream that stands up for men's rights.Yeah. Good point. | /r/MensRights | 21/03/20 06:07 PM |
| 1 | Bill Burr is the biggest and loudest voice in the mainstream that stands up for men's rights.Naw, the fact that he's out there in the first place just yapping on and on about it, when he could just not do that and chill and actually practice what he preaches if he is supposedly over all of this, indicates that he feels a desire to be the guy out there doing that and wants to be known for that. Dude, what are you talking about? A comedian's job is to tell joke. The fact that they tell jokes isn't evidence that they try too hard. Add in his overly emphatic comedic style to make his points… | /r/MensRights | 20/03/20 05:25 PM |
| 1 | Bill Burr is the biggest and loudest voice in the mainstream that stands up for men's rights.And he brings out many of the vulnerabilities of the male gender role without slipping into sappy victimhood. This is a good point. Some of his material is about what feminists would call 'toxic masculinity' but in contrast to feminists he speaks about it empathically. And instead of saying that this is a fundamental flaw of men and that men need to be 'reeducated' to be more feminine he comes for a direction that this often comes from the reponsiblies men have to shoulder. | /r/MensRights | 20/03/20 05:16 PM |
| 1 | Bill Burr is the biggest and loudest voice in the mainstream that stands up for men's rights.Or he doesn't try too hard to signal how edgy and politically incorrect he is and this is all in your head. | /r/MensRights | 20/03/20 02:40 PM |
| 3 | Bill Burr is the biggest and loudest voice in the mainstream that stands up for men's rights.Maybe because it's 'hate speech'. | /r/MensRights | 20/03/20 10:57 AM |
| 7 | Bill Burr is the biggest and loudest voice in the mainstream that stands up for men's rights.I watched all of his specials and I listen to his podcast sometimes. I don't think he tries too hard at all. I just think you project something onto him that isn't really there. | /r/MensRights | 19/03/20 09:42 PM |
| 7 | Bill Burr is the biggest and loudest voice in the mainstream that stands up for men's rights.If him saying 'fuck' is what's bothering you, then you just sensitive to the word 'fuck' it doesn't mean he's trying to signal to the audience 'I'm so edgy I just said 'fuck''... No one cares about saying "fuck" anymore... You're not 'anti-establishment' if you're saying 'fuck'. John Oliver is THE establishment and he says 'fuck' all the time. This is just the way Bill talks. He talks the same way on his podcast. He's more restrained here because in the US you aren't allowed to curse on talk sho… | /r/MensRights | 19/03/20 09:33 PM |
| 2 | Bill Burr is the biggest and loudest voice in the mainstream that stands up for men's rights.Yup. Though he has plenty of others just as good. | /r/MensRights | 19/03/20 09:24 PM |
| 2 | Bill Burr is the biggest and loudest voice in the mainstream that stands up for men's rights.I don't know what you're talking about. You have an example? | /r/MensRights | 19/03/20 09:23 PM |
| 2 | Bill Burr is the biggest and loudest voice in the mainstream that stands up for men's rights.I'm outside of the USA and it works fine for me. | /r/MensRights | 19/03/20 09:22 PM |
| 2 | Thoughts on celebrities perpetuating these gender myths? I’m more than certain all of these claims are not just false, but are dangerously tilted in woman’s favour.Don't the studies you quoted give contradictory results? Some say it's about 50 50, others say it's more women than men and others still say it's the other way around? | /r/MensRights | 10/03/20 07:30 PM |
| 3 | Thoughts on celebrities perpetuating these gender myths? I’m more than certain all of these claims are not just false, but are dangerously tilted in woman’s favour.However, who gives any fucks what any red carpet celeb thinks as their only real contributions are literally a few lines in a speech as they return to their lavish lifestyle feeling as though they made a difference. I think it's not about what their contribution are, but more about how wide their reach is. The goal here isn't to say: "I'm Cara Delevingne, and you should think Y about issue X because I think Y about issue X. And you should trust me because I walk on catwalks in sexy clothes, so I… | /r/MensRights | 10/03/20 05:21 PM |
| 12 | Thoughts on celebrities perpetuating these gender myths? I’m more than certain all of these claims are not just false, but are dangerously tilted in woman’s favour.To be fair, it isn't entirely their fault. Some of these do-gooder celebrities are doing it to get more approval brownie points. However, I think most of them really believe they are using their huge platform to make a difference. Currently, most of those points are socially accepted truths. So a given celebrity would just parrot them thinking they genuinely doing something good. As for those points: It is demonstrably false that women experience more violence than men. The majority of victims o… | /r/MensRights | 10/03/20 01:04 PM |
| 123 | Toxic femininity gets reduced to acceptable things... That loud violent woman that abuses you in public should keep right on being herself...Unless you're a woman that says something against feminism. Then you shouldn't ask hard questions, tell the truth, or keep being assertive. Actually, if you're a woman and you say something against feminism, it's OK to send you death threats and call you all the names in the book. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/20 06:28 PM |
| 5 | That's an interesting way to say 3/4 men are homelessThat's not an interesting way to say 3/4 men are homeless. It's an interesting way to say that out of the homeless people: 3/4 are men. | /r/MensRights | 02/02/20 10:46 PM |
| 3 | 1) Wrong. I have the right to refuse sex to any person I want for any reason I want. 2) You are literally asking for legalised rape.Come on man. No one actually thinks this.The "article" is from 2017. There aren't enough hours in the day to be upset about every opinion of some blue-haired SJW. This isn't a majority held opinion. | /r/MensRights | 25/01/20 10:41 PM |
| 22 | When trying to discuss male health problems is considered offensiveIt isn't obvious it was removed because it's 'offensive'. What did the mods say? | /r/MensRights | 24/01/20 08:03 PM |
| 0 | From the rules of /r/PinkpillFeminismSo what? People have the right (Or at least should have the right) to talk about whatever they want. What's the problem? I may disagree with them, but it doesn't mean they shouldn't be allowed to talk about what they want. | /r/MensRights | 21/01/20 10:30 PM |
| 1 | From the rules of /r/PinkpillFeminismYou dont see a problem with them allowing postings of "femdom" materials that classify men as "subhuman" and "that need to be controlled by the matriarchy"? Not at all, people should be able to say whatever they want. Plus, femdom is a type of kink as far as I know. Have a look here {GRAPHIC NSFW WARNING} r/femdom | /r/MensRights | 21/01/20 09:56 PM |
| 1 | From the rules of /r/PinkpillFeminismYes. Thanks... I'm not completely down with the lingo. | /r/MensRights | 21/01/20 09:02 PM |
| -1 | From the rules of /r/PinkpillFeminismThey could exclude whomever they like. What's the problem with that? Like what's the problem with actual women AKA XX wanting to talk only with actual women about some things? | /r/MensRights | 21/01/20 08:47 PM |
| -2 | From the rules of /r/PinkpillFeminismSo two wrongs make a right in your opinion? What's the problem with what's circled in red? I don't see any evidence for them being a 'hate sub' in the image. From where I sit, it seems you want them banned for 'thought crimes'. | /r/MensRights | 21/01/20 08:30 PM |
| -2 | From the rules of /r/PinkpillFeminismI don't get it. Are they so woke that they can't say 'men' and 'women' and instead they say 'xy person'? They seem to break this rule though when they say 'Criticizing men is 100% okay'. Also, are they TURFS? They say only XX. ANYHOW... I see ABSOLUTELY no problem with what is circled in red. What is your problem with it? The first post in the sub tries to "justify it" but if you sort by controversial comments on that post you see someone explaining that it's just so they don't get banned. REDDI… | /r/MensRights | 21/01/20 08:15 PM |
| 1 | The reason this is even newsworthy is because of the feminist agenda to paint men as predatory.Doubtful. Henry is a big Hollywood celebrity. This would be news if he was dating a 60 year old granny. Also, saying this is news is a stretch. It's gossip at best. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/20 03:05 AM |
| 33 | Men should not be allowed to teach because they are all just rapists anyway. (Not even the right statistics, but oke?)Interesting... When 98% of C.E.O's are men, it apparently has nothing to do with men being successful innately. It's just a product of discrimination and the patriarchy. Yet When 98% of rapists are men, then it's just how men are, and there is nothing that could be done about it, save keeping children away from men. | /r/MensRights | 31/12/19 07:10 PM |
| 2 | Probably has been posted before but, did you guys know there’s a dedicated subreddit who’s soul purpose is to make this subreddit look bad?Maybe. It sounds plausible. | /r/MensRights | 24/12/19 06:30 PM |
| 3 | Probably has been posted before but, did you guys know there’s a dedicated subreddit who’s soul purpose is to make this subreddit look bad?I'll go and ask them | /r/MensRights | 24/12/19 05:24 PM |
| 21 | Probably has been posted before but, did you guys know there’s a dedicated subreddit who’s soul purpose is to make this subreddit look bad?I think you meant 'sole purpose'. Also, what's "GSMphobia"? | /r/MensRights | 24/12/19 05:14 PM |
| 7 | Iranian born actress Shohreh Aghdashloo (From the Expanse) explains Hollywood gender pay gap to a male feminist.You are a special kind of idiot, aren't you? Just for future references... If you are responding to a video, maybe try watching it first before opening your mouth... Though I fail to see how someone can misfire so hard even without watching the video and just by reading the title...All you need is an elementary school level understanding of the English language... Especially since you proposed a better title. | /r/MensRights | 24/12/19 04:50 PM |
| 11 | Iranian born actress Shohreh Aghdashloo (From the Expanse) explains Hollywood gender pay gap to a male feminist.He also tried to lead her into saying 'men are afraid of strong women'. She didn't have any of that... | /r/MensRights | 24/12/19 11:30 AM |
| 394 | Men work more than women, women most affectedThis is one of the most disingenuous headlines I've seen in a long time. | /r/MensRights | 15/12/19 08:34 PM |
| 1 | Men's Rights vs Feminism: Is Toxic Masculinity Real?I don't think verbal diarrhea he spews could be solely explained by him being young. | /r/MensRights | 01/12/19 09:44 PM |
| 5 | Men's Rights vs Feminism: Is Toxic Masculinity Real?This Derrick isn't an MRA. He's quite literally your garden variety asshole. He doesn't understand what he's talking about, and it seems what he does say pretty simply stems from unadulterated misogyny. In other words, he's the poster boy for everything feminists accuse MRA's of. It makes you wonder if he's not a stand-in for specifically that purpose. The Ph.D. student was sharp though. All his points were driven home, his arguments were logical and his objections made sense. I felt the feminis… | /r/MensRights | 01/12/19 07:52 PM |
| 2 | The Necessity of Chivalry by C.S. Lewis DoodleIt was published in 1940, during WWII. This is an illustration of a C.S. Lewis essay that was published on the 17th August 1940 during the heat and roar of the Battle of Britain - five days after 'Eagleday' (13 August 1940) – the Nazi Luftwaffe’s operation to destroy the Royal Air Force. It was also just three days before Churchill’s famous “Never was so much owed by so many to so few” speech (20 August 1940) concerning heroic British fighter pilots (some 500+ young fighter pilots had been kille… | /r/MensRights | 22/11/19 12:09 AM |
| 33 | Scarlett Johansson Now Regrets Being ‘Hyper-Sexualized,’ Blames It On Men | Translation: wealthy actress bites the hand that fed her.+1 for not biting the bait. | /r/MensRights | 15/11/19 04:57 PM |
| 1 | Scarlett Johansson Now Regrets Being ‘Hyper-Sexualized,’ Blames It On Men | Translation: wealthy actress bites the hand that fed her.she's a mediocre actress. She isn't. Her political opinions aside, she is good at what she does. However, being attractive is part of the job description of an actor. This is also true for men but to a lesser degree. | /r/MensRights | 15/11/19 04:55 PM |
| 17 | WTF?This is old news... Though it's quite funny at 00:57 it says "It will help keep the conversation going about a problem that many women face daily." First of all, If women's problems consist of men sitting with their legs apart in public transportation it means the problems of women's issues are pretty much solved. Second. Why only women face this daily? If a man sits with his legs apart so no one can sit next to him, don't everyone face this 'problem'? Or is it only a problem when a woman can't … | /r/MensRights | 05/11/19 02:39 PM |
| 2 | is this belongs here ?I don't think so... | /r/MensRights | 23/09/19 07:26 PM |
| 2 | >Making new and original ip's instead of taking already established characters.I like your username. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/19 07:16 PM |
| 10 | >Making new and original ip's instead of taking already established characters.I thought it was bad to shame people based on their sexual experiences (Or lack thereof) | /r/MensRights | 09/09/19 06:20 PM |
| 1 | Chris Pine discusses the double standards of nudity in film on 'The Graham Norton Show' S24E04 (03:11)Hodor! | /r/MensRights | 23/08/19 01:31 AM |
| 1 | Chris Pine discusses the double standards of nudity in film on 'The Graham Norton Show' S24E04 (03:11)Sally Field made some vague statement about these issues really being female-centric, probably implying that women are "shamed" for expressing their sexuality Indeed. I agree with you that there is a supply and demand disparity as far as full frontal nudity is concerned. And women are more interested in seeing a shirtless man than a frontal nude of that man with a flaccid penis. On the other hand men would rather see a frontal nude of a woman than just her topless. Though I'm not entirely sure. … | /r/MensRights | 22/08/19 04:34 PM |
| 6 | Chris Pine discusses the double standards of nudity in film on 'The Graham Norton Show' S24E04 (03:11)Fair enough. Though my main point wasn't about 'why it's happening' but the double standard of addressing such comments in mainstream media. For example it's acceptable for Graham Norton to show Chris Pine a tweet where some woman is excited about seeing him naked and says "The highlight of the movie is seeing Chris Pine's package." Yet Graham wouldn't be so quick to show such messages to female actresses. I'm sure that such messages addressing actresses are far more numerous that the one meant … | /r/MensRights | 22/08/19 03:53 PM |
| 5 | Chris Pine discusses the double standards of nudity in film on 'The Graham Norton Show' S24E04 (03:11)I'd like to point out that the idea here is that it is acceptable to say these things about men in mainstream media. (As it is demonstrated in this very show, which is highly popular and mainstream). Yet talking about a woman in a similar way wouldn't be acceptable. In other words, Grahm Norton wouldn't feature comments made by horny men about Emma Stone's nude scene in 'The Favorite'. Especially not to her face. | /r/MensRights | 22/08/19 03:19 PM |
| 1 | So when women are toxic to us, it's apperantly our fault.Aren't everybody? | /r/MensRights | 04/08/19 11:26 AM |
| 1 | So when women are toxic to us, it's apperantly our fault.It does? What did we learn? | /r/MensRights | 04/08/19 11:16 AM |
| 1 | So when women are toxic to us, it's apperantly our fault.Y | /r/MensRights | 04/08/19 11:13 AM |
| 1 | So when women are toxic to us, it's apperantly our fault.Sure. As well as you can use hundreds of other words to the same effect. For example 'Shut Up!', 'Don't be a pussy', 'Don't be a coward' etc | /r/MensRights | 04/08/19 11:05 AM |
| 1 | So when women are toxic to us, it's apperantly our fault.Yes. What of it? | /r/MensRights | 04/08/19 10:52 AM |
| 1 | So when women are toxic to us, it's apperantly our fault.What? What are you talking about? Shaming isn't specific to 'man up'. You can use a bunch of other words to shame someone into silence, such as 'misogynist'. | /r/MensRights | 04/08/19 10:52 AM |
| 2 | So when women are toxic to us, it's apperantly our fault.This is an anecdote. The average woman won't appreciate it if she's told 'she looks like a man'. Because it's synonymous with being unattractive. Men (On average) are not attracted to women who look like men. | /r/MensRights | 04/08/19 10:48 AM |
| -1 | So when women are toxic to us, it's apperantly our fault.Dude, it ain't that hard. "Man up" = 'Stop complaining and\or do what needs to be done". How about more practical examples? When someone online complains that they find the term 'man up' offensive and it hurts their sensitivities and feeling. Once could say "man up! It's just a word". | /r/MensRights | 04/08/19 01:08 AM |
| 1 | So when women are toxic to us, it's apperantly our fault.Yeah. Seems reasonable. | /r/MensRights | 04/08/19 12:57 AM |
| 0 | So when women are toxic to us, it's apperantly our fault.When a person needs to man up. If we are in the army and we are getting shot at and one of us is shooting back while the other is cowering in the corner in a fetal position sucking his thumb. It's completely reasonable for the shooting guy to tell to the cowering guy "Man the fuck up and give me the magazine!" | /r/MensRights | 04/08/19 12:56 AM |
| 19 | So when women are toxic to us, it's apperantly our fault.As if women don't find it offensive if they are told they are 'manly'. Try telling a woman "You look like a man" and see what happens. | /r/MensRights | 04/08/19 12:48 AM |
| 3 | So when women are toxic to us, it's apperantly our fault.No shes being an asshole Not always. The problem here isn't that someone says 'man up'. The problem is that some people think that the term 'man up' is toxic, which it isn't. Sometimes it's completely reasonable to say to someone 'man up'. | /r/MensRights | 04/08/19 12:46 AM |
| 5 | Change my view, by putting any crime related to sex under the category of "rape" lessens the severity and meaning of rape and is part of the reason guys are afraid to interact with women in today's societyreckless endangerment It's reckless endangerment only if you didn't do it on purpose. If you intentionally infect someone with potentially lethal disease, that's attempted murder. | /r/MensRights | 01/08/19 10:32 AM |
| 1 | Tinder experiment that only looks matter to women-not personality or behavior.I mean to say only some women. | /r/MensRights | 01/08/19 10:30 AM |
| 27 | Change my view, by putting any crime related to sex under the category of "rape" lessens the severity and meaning of rape and is part of the reason guys are afraid to interact with women in today's societyMaybe not rape, but it defiantly is some sort of assault. If you knowingly infect someone with AIDS you should get a sentence of something at least equivalent to 'reckless endangerment' | /r/MensRights | 01/08/19 02:44 AM |
| 7 | Tinder experiment that only looks matter to women-not personality or behavior.Vee made a video about this. While it's very interesting and shows hypocrisy when men are criticized for looking for superficial characteristics in women. It's important to remember that Tinder respondents are not a very representative sample. | /r/MensRights | 01/08/19 02:27 AM |
| 2 | I hate these sort of people*if you don't | /r/MensRights | 27/07/19 01:27 AM |
| 1 | Is ever okay to charge double the price for men in a gym membership?Let's say that everyone used to pay $10. Now the business decides to let women in for free. If they want to keep revenue constant, they will need to charge men $20 assuming there is no change in interest from men. Of course, interest from men will probably go down since the cost went up. I see. So when you use arbitrary numbers to prove your point, it's ok. Yet when I do it, it isn't... How convenient. Plus the interest of men won't go down, because I won't charge them 20$. I will charge them 10… | /r/MensRights | 20/07/19 11:06 AM |
| 1 | Is ever okay to charge double the price for men in a gym membership?If you claim that something is "demonstrably" not true, then try to demonstrate it using actual facts, not numbers that you pulled out of thin air. I did. In my original example. You can see that with actual numbers the men pay the same amount as they did before. Besides, it's your claim that the men pay twice as much. You need to prove it with 'actual numbers'. First, you pulled numbers out of thin air. What do you mean? It's an example. It's a demonstration that with those numbers the men pay … | /r/MensRights | 18/07/19 09:36 AM |
| 1 | Is ever okay to charge double the price for men in a gym membership?This is a simple definition of a word. 100% true. This is exactly what I don't understand. How does what he said shows he thinks one race is better than another? | /r/MensRights | 16/07/19 08:31 PM |
| 1 | Is ever okay to charge double the price for men in a gym membership?I guess we agree to disagree. | /r/MensRights | 16/07/19 10:50 AM |
| 1 | Is ever okay to charge double the price for men in a gym membership?Having regulations for businesses to follow is not socialism But it's anti-capitalism, wouldn't you agree? | /r/MensRights | 15/07/19 11:06 PM |
| 1 | Is ever okay to charge double the price for men in a gym membership?In the example I put in this thread, my club is the means of production. You want the state to take control of the means of production from me and dictate rules on how I use those means of production. So this is defiantly anti-capitalist. | /r/MensRights | 15/07/19 08:02 PM |
| 1 | Is ever okay to charge double the price for men in a gym membership?A restaurant in the south that banned blacks in the 1950s would probably have improved their profits, because whites would attract more customers and blacks would put off other customers. Is that a valid argument for discriminating? Definitely. Don't forget that this will make it easier for a competitor to come along and score all the black clients. If all other restaurants discriminates against blacks and you don't, you are going to make a major profit. If not, then why would it be a valid argu… | /r/MensRights | 15/07/19 07:59 PM |
| 1 | Is ever okay to charge double the price for men in a gym membership?if you look at a large enough time/space scale, it is a closed system. How do you justify that statement? It's demonstrably isn't true. And I demonstrated to you why. You are talking about a zero-sum game where [women entry fee(X)] + [men entry fee(Y)] = [my profit(Z)] So the equation is X+Y=Z. Let's say x=10 and y=10. so my profit is 20. Now if I want to let the women in for free and keep my profit the same the equation is 0+Y=20 so Y=20 and the men need to pay twice as much. But the thing is t… | /r/MensRights | 15/07/19 07:45 PM |
| 1 | Is ever okay to charge double the price for men in a gym membership?There is definitely something socialist about it and definitely something anti-capitalist about it. | /r/MensRights | 15/07/19 11:14 AM |
| 1 | Is ever okay to charge double the price for men in a gym membership?Not really. How does my example relate to this? | /r/MensRights | 15/07/19 11:11 AM |
| 1 | Is ever okay to charge double the price for men in a gym membership?The men now have to pay twice as much as they otherwise would have No they don't. Why would you think that? The men pay exactly the same before and after discrimination. but what if I just want to have a drink and relax with my friends? Why should I have to pay a higher charge than a woman who wants the same thing? First of all, let me reiterate that you are wrong that men are paying twice as much as they did before, or that men are paying for the women. Second, even if they did pay twice as muc… | /r/MensRights | 15/07/19 11:06 AM |
| 1 | Is ever okay to charge double the price for men in a gym membership?This is simple math. In order to keep your revenue constant, if you want to give one group a discount, you have to raise prices on the others. It is simple math, you are just bad at it. What you say is only true in a closed system, where the number of customers is constant, which is not the case here. Let's say the price of entry is 1$, before discrimination I have 40 clients and after I have 100 (50 of which are paying). In both cases the entry fee is 1$. In the first case I make 40$ in the sec… | /r/MensRights | 15/07/19 10:47 AM |
| 1 | Is ever okay to charge double the price for men in a gym membership?The first one’s easy, the men are essentially paying for the women to get in Except this isn't true, I let the women in for free. It's free publicity. How do you figure the men are essentially paying for the women? showing everyone that women can freeload their loves by taking advantage of thirsty men So I guess you think stripclubs and porn should be illegal then? After all, it's women who benefit financially from thirsty men. The right thing to do is for the state to punish discrimination. How… | /r/MensRights | 15/07/19 12:41 AM |
| 0 | Is ever okay to charge double the price for men in a gym membership?it cements the idea that women aren’t responsible for making their own way and it’s men’s job to take care of them How exactly does it do that? This argument has very 'feminist' vibes to it. "We need to stop 'harmful' stereotypes!" How is a girl who gets to a club for free would think that she isn't responsible for her own actions? How will a guy who goes to a club where he meets nice girls will think 'it's his job to care of girls'.? Sure, it may be better for your business, but sometimes the r… | /r/MensRights | 14/07/19 11:04 PM |
| 0 | Is ever okay to charge double the price for men in a gym membership?Why? If I'm a club owner (And I charge everyone equally) I can house a maximum of 100 people in my club but I only manage to get 30-40 people each night. One day I notice that in my area there are lots of extremely hot yet extremely broke women. So I decide to let the women in for free. And I instantly get 100 people in the club (Let's say 50 of whom are women) I still have 10 more paying men than I usually have and not only that. More people means more money from drinks. So I make a substantial… | /r/MensRights | 14/07/19 09:01 PM |
| 0 | Is ever okay to charge double the price for men in a gym membership?I'm not a communist. I think a company can charge whomever they want however they want and the free market will decide if it's 'OK'. If you ask is it discrimination? It definitely is. However, I don't see discrimination as something that is inherently not ok. I will think this discrimination is 'not ok' if the reason they did it was to 'right' some social justice wrong. However, there's a case to be made that incentivizing more women to join would be a good business practice. Similar to how pubs… | /r/MensRights | 14/07/19 07:32 PM |
| 1 | Got downvoted to hell in r/tennis for this. Just my stance on "equal pay" while women play best of 3 and men play best of 5But it is about viewership. This is not really about the amount of 'work' you put in. It's about how much this work worth. And the more people want to see you play the more your work is worth. | /r/MensRights | 07/07/19 01:39 AM |
| 12 | Get woke, go broke. Anita Sarkeesian, known feminist fraud, is out of business.I don't think 'get woke go broke' applies to her at all. She is the opposite of that. Her whole scam was about convincing people to pay her money because she's so woke. If anything, she went broke because she stopped producing her woke content. | /r/MensRights | 23/06/19 08:04 PM |
| 2 | I think that women and men should be equalSo in your mind, women's rights mean equality, but men's rights mean men's superiority? Can you explain why you think so? | /r/MensRights | 21/06/19 06:25 PM |
| 1 | I think that women and men should be equalDoes the title 'womenrights' means 'women superiority'? What posts here are sexists? | /r/MensRights | 21/06/19 05:52 PM |
| 2 | I think that women and men should be equalWhy would you think so? | /r/MensRights | 21/06/19 05:22 PM |
| 1 | I think that women and men should be equalI doubt you'll find a lot of sexists here... | /r/MensRights | 21/06/19 05:18 PM |
| 10 | Corporations now openly discriminate in favor of womenI wonder if they let you in if you just show up and claim you are a woman? | /r/MensRights | 03/06/19 01:13 AM |
| 8 | Intelligent people of this Subreddit explain this, because my mum and I think it makes no sense.Obviously, this is complete gibberish and the only current use for this term is to silence someone telling you something you don't like. Originally this was something like how a man would assume a woman doesn't understand something so he would talk to her in a condescending manner. For example, a mechanic explaining to a woman what's wrong with her car. "See that thing with the cables? This is a battery and it's helping your car to start. Without it, you can't start your engine." This assumes th… | /r/MensRights | 02/06/19 10:38 PM |
| 1 | Feminist needs you all right now.And wouldn't you agree that it's relevant to find out if that's indeed the case in this specific instance instead of extrapolating from what most victims want? | /r/MensRights | 02/06/19 04:09 PM |
| 0 | Feminist needs you all right now.I didn't ask why he doesn't leave. I asked if it's a case where he wants to leave or not. There's a difference between someone who wants to stay in an abusive relationship and someone who wants to leave. Why is requesting more information about the situation is met with downvotes is beyond me. | /r/MensRights | 02/06/19 01:22 PM |
| 1 | Feminist needs you all right now.And he doesn't want to leave her? | /r/MensRights | 02/06/19 09:57 AM |
| 4 | Feminist needs you all right now.I'm a bit confused, what ages are we talking about? | /r/MensRights | 02/06/19 02:08 AM |
| 2 | Perfectly balanced, as all things should beThey would've had more subs if they weren't such a tight echo chamber. It's literally part of their official rules that you can't post something critical of feminism. | /r/MensRights | 08/05/19 06:48 PM |
| 3 | I'm wondering if this is any good? I made it to talk about the hashtag, all men are trash.It's not a big deal. Though if you want to publish this on facebook or something you can go over it with Grammarly or something. It fixes grammar issues automatically, including capitalizing first letters in sentences. I use it alot. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/19 02:23 AM |
| 6 | I'm wondering if this is any good? I made it to talk about the hashtag, all men are trash.It's amazing! Though I'm a bit thrown off that sentences aren't starting with capital letters. | /r/MensRights | 03/05/19 02:16 AM |
| 3 | Banned in less than a minute at /r/feminismIf you aren't banned in /r/Feminism, then you are doing something wrong... They ban anyone and everyone who even slightly challenges their views. If you are perfectly reasonable, perfectly polite, and as a question that doesn't 100% conform to their view, they would ban you. Not only that, if you are banned on /r/Feminism you are also auto banned on other feminist subs... I used to be really annoyed by this at first. However, now I'm more relaxed about this... I was also banned from /r/TwoXChr… | /r/MensRights | 25/04/19 05:19 PM |
| -1 | Girl doesn't like boyfriend because she found out he got raped as a child.I feel that people should cut the girl some slack, she didn't do anything wrong, besides being honest. It's a pretty shitty development, however, she's honest. You can't help how you feel, and you can't help how certain revelations about someone would make you feel about them. It's easy to sit on your high and mighty horse and say it's shitty behavior to dump someone because you don't feel the same about them after you found out they have been raped. But if it's true, what was she supposed to do… | /r/MensRights | 15/02/19 10:40 AM |
| 1 | If this was a woman she'd be praised, but since it's a man, he is made fun of for his appearance35000/365 = 95.8 So writing an original article every day would take him 96 years... | /r/MensRights | 31/01/19 11:51 PM |
| 1 | Why do people say 'The last Jedi' was feminist propaganda?Yeah... I agree. That's why there is this 6-hour video review of the movie (From where I linked the clips) that talks about everything that's wrong with it. And he admits that there are many more things that he missed. It's just we were talking about Poe and the movie depicting him as 'hothead' who is reckless and unintelligent. I agree that this is what the movie is trying to do. But upon reflection all Poes decisions, are good decisions. By not telling Poe about the plan Gender Studies makes a… | /r/MensRights | 18/03/18 03:42 PM |
| 1 | Why do people say 'The last Jedi' was feminist propaganda?An explanation why Po did nothing wrong articulated by someone better than myself. Those are just clips discussing Poe's motivations every instance he speaks to Gender Studies. They are part of a much larger in-depth review. So I put the links to relevant timestamps. https://youtu.be/vw7pcCj0ORk?t=3185 and https://youtu.be/_gRC4L6lNoc?t=1952 and https://youtu.be/_gRC4L6lNoc?t=2202 | /r/MensRights | 17/03/18 02:32 PM |
| 5 | YouTube prankster sentenced to 180d imprisonment for shooting boyfriend deadCome on man... It was a result of stupidity on the part of the boyfriend. While I can't say for a fact, I think the same judgment would be rendered if the situation was reversed. Monalisa Perez, now 20, was asked by Pedro Ruiz, 22, to fire a gun from a foot (30cm) away, believing a thick book he held in front of his chest would shield him. It was the boyfriend's idea to do it. The sentencing is below state guidelines but Norman County Attorney James Brue said "the reality [is] that this foolish … | /r/MensRights | 15/03/18 11:13 PM |
| 1 | Why do people say 'The last Jedi' was feminist propaganda?It used to be the case with me. I used to think that he's just some idiot who makes autistic noises while playing video games. And for the most part, this is somewhat true. However, his more serious videos like this review or other things like this video about Amy Schumer or this one about celebrities blaming Trump for natural disasters, really have a point beyond all the silliness he usually does. He is the biggest channel on YouTube and it's nice to see that he doesn't bend to pressures of Soc… | /r/MensRights | 12/03/18 09:16 PM |
| 1 | Why do people say 'The last Jedi' was feminist propaganda?While I think Sargon's review was very entertaining, I think this PewDiePie review is more objective, and it truly reflects why I think this movie was crap. | /r/MensRights | 12/03/18 02:47 PM |
| 1 | Why do people say 'The last Jedi' was feminist propaganda?That's fine. Have a nice day. | /r/MensRights | 12/03/18 02:42 PM |
| 1 | Why do people say 'The last Jedi' was feminist propaganda?7 out 12 fighters is hardly equivalent to 'sell all the stuff I have'. It's more equivalent to if you are homeless, and all you have is 12 dollars, and you bet 10 and win 200. Even if all you have is 12 dollars, betting it all on zero is not a good strategy. It is if you have a good chance to make it 200 dollars. They had a sound plan which Leia greenlit. It's not like Poe cooked it up from his own bravado. They were committed to an assault and Leia bailed in the middle of it because some pilots… | /r/MensRights | 12/03/18 02:22 PM |
| 1 | Why do people say 'The last Jedi' was feminist propaganda?What makes you say that trolls are involved? | /r/MensRights | 12/03/18 02:31 AM |
| 1 | Why do people say 'The last Jedi' was feminist propaganda?Well, they did get rid of Luke now. Well like I said I do think the feminist aspect of the film has been exaggerated, there's no denying an agenda is there though. The feminists certainly seem to think so. To me, it wasn't that obvious when I watch the movie. What I thought when watching it was "Oh come on! This doesn't make any sense. Why did he do it? Why didn't they do it sooner?" and so on... I didn't roll my eyes and think "This is clearly a feminist agenda." Though I admit, perhaps I give … | /r/MensRights | 11/03/18 09:46 PM |
| 0 | Why do people say 'The last Jedi' was feminist propaganda?and feminism is money I think this is a misconception pushed by the Feminists, a misconception that was proven wrong with the Ghostbusters movie. The idea that women don't like fantasy or Sci-Fi because there wasn't enough female or Sci-Fi role models that young girls could identify with is in my opinion pure bullshit. The majority of women are just not interested in Sci-Fi and truly, the majority of men aren't either. When I was in school only a small percentage of boys were interested in geeki… | /r/MensRights | 11/03/18 09:41 PM |
| 1 | Why do people say 'The last Jedi' was feminist propaganda?Yeah, but when two movies have the same 92% RT score that doesn't really tell you anything. It's possible that two movies one of which the average score is 9 out of 10 and the other where the average score is 6 out of 10 would both get 92% RT score. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/18 09:22 PM |
| 2 | Why do people say 'The last Jedi' was feminist propaganda?I think they're also talking about the lineup where all the main actresses are female and you have the one black guy there. But Kylo Ren is white. Harrison Ford is white, Luke is white. Above all though the movie just seems to be pretty crap, great 3D graphics but that's about it and as you say the storytelling from what I can gather of the plot just seems to be not just bad and inconsistent but non-existent really. Full agreement with you there... | /r/MensRights | 11/03/18 09:19 PM |
| 1 | Why do people say 'The last Jedi' was feminist propaganda?RT has an idiotic rating scale. 92% Tomatometer doesn't mean that the average score the critics gave the movie is 9 out of 10. It means that 92% of the critics who gave a score to the movie, gave it a score higher than 60. This means that if there are 10 critics overall and they all give a certain movie a score of 61, Tomatometer would show 100%. Even worse. If 5 of those critics rate the movie as 60 and the other 5 as 61, Tomatometer would show 50%. This is a dumb scoring system that doesn't re… | /r/MensRights | 11/03/18 08:42 PM |
| 1 | Why do people say 'The last Jedi' was feminist propaganda?Most of the pilots are like 7 out of 12. I would argue that it was the best possible use for those pilots. It possibly was the best possible OUTCOME. As if I sell all stuff I have, travel to Las Vegas, bet all on zero, and win. It doesn't make it a wise decision. 7 out 12 fighters is hardly equivalent to 'sell all the stuff I have'. It's more equivalent to if you are homeless, and all you have is 12 dollars, and you bet 10 and win 200. He didn't. For all he knew, the plan of the 'leadership' was… | /r/MensRights | 11/03/18 08:37 PM |
| 2 | Why do people say 'The last Jedi' was feminist propaganda?But it does. If he had obeyed her everyone would have escaped. Him acting on the information he had was, without question, portrayed as objectively wrong. In this movie he was the wrong impetuous asshole who should have listened to the woman and believed in her. The message theyre sending is “listen and believe women” whether you received it or not. I'm not convinced. The average viewer (I would wager most feminists who are not too crazy too) would do exactly what Poe did. They would reason that… | /r/MensRights | 11/03/18 08:20 PM |
| 3 | Why do people say 'The last Jedi' was feminist propaganda?Indeed. I was proposing in watching the Saragon review until the movie came out on DVD. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/18 07:45 PM |
| -6 | Why do people say 'The last Jedi' was feminist propaganda?I think what he said doesn't matter. What matters is what comes across to the viewer. In Star Trek Discovery, they said they want to make a feminist and anti-Trump show. But even if they didn't say this, it is obvious from the show itself that this is what they intended to do. That is to say, even if you don't know anything about what the creators said, when you see this show it's obvious that this is feminist and anti trump propaganda. The Last Jedi didn't feel to me like this. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/18 07:42 PM |
| 1 | Why do people say 'The last Jedi' was feminist propaganda?I haven't seen Black Panther, but even in not Social Justice Warrior circles Wonder Woman is considered to be the best DC superhero movie of the late years. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/18 07:38 PM |
| 0 | Why do people say 'The last Jedi' was feminist propaganda?My analogy was intended to push the idea to the extreme. IE, it doesn't matter what the artist intended to paint, draw, write etc... It only matters how the audience understands it. And just quoting the artists saying 'What I meant to draw here was a circle' doesn't make the picture less triangular. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/18 07:36 PM |
| 1 | Why do people say 'The last Jedi' was feminist propaganda?I already commented on this here. It would help if you would watch the movie carefully. Po wasted most of the pilots rebels had. Just the fact he was successful at idiotic move (adventurous moves sometimes succeed), doesn't make Leia's judgement wrong. Most of the pilots are like 7 out of 12. I would argue that it was the best possible use for those pilots. It's not that they actually could do something with extra 7 fighters, and if they could I doubt it would have had as big of an impact as des… | /r/MensRights | 11/03/18 07:32 PM |
| 3 | Why do people say 'The last Jedi' was feminist propaganda?While you, I, and everyone else on the planet knows that admiral gender-studies was a bitch and that rose objectively did the wrong thing in “saving his life” while in all likelihood dooming the entire resistance AND FINN, thats simply not the way that they were portrayed in the movie. Maybe I'm too jaded but I think it's obvious that Admiral Gender Studies was a bitch even though she was vindicated in the end. Because she really wasn't vindicated. She was a bad commander. She didn't explain to … | /r/MensRights | 11/03/18 07:14 PM |
| -5 | Why do people say 'The last Jedi' was feminist propaganda?How is it in any way analogous to what I said? I said that the intent of the director doesn't matter if the end product doesn't reflect that intent. Or if this intent isn't obvious to the audience. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/18 07:03 PM |
| 1 | Why do people say 'The last Jedi' was feminist propaganda?No, wait, not just women, but wise, never mistaken women. I would say that this is categorically wrong in my opinion. All women in this movie made mistakes more often than not. I already commented on this here. Brave pilot is a totally reckless penis wielding cretin that needs to be controlled tightly not to fuck up things on galactic level, so stupid and so reckless, the stupid reckless fuck is. This is completely false as well. Poe acted on the information he had. And given the information he … | /r/MensRights | 11/03/18 06:56 PM |
| 1 | Why do people say 'The last Jedi' was feminist propaganda?I say that what actors, directors or the sound guys do outside of the movie isn't relevant at all. I was talking about the movie itself 'as is' without any outside interference. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/18 06:48 PM |
| -5 | Why do people say 'The last Jedi' was feminist propaganda?If I wanted to paint a square and ended up painting something that looks to everybody else as a triangle, did I paint a square or a triangle? In my opinion how the end result actually looks is infinitely more important than what the author or the painter intended to do. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/18 06:37 PM |
| 0 | Why do people say 'The last Jedi' was feminist propaganda?Ben Affleck is not attractive enough for someone to complain about it. | /r/MensRights | 11/03/18 06:14 PM |
| -4 | Why do people say 'The last Jedi' was feminist propaganda?The male characters in TLJ are all awful. Luke is an embarrassing joke, Poe is written to be an aggressive male idiot, Finn spends the whole film being carted around by some random new Asian woman. I really didn't see this in this way. I explained more specifically in this comment on this thread. The director said he was making a feminist film and retweeted an “ask me about my feminist agenda” t-shirt. I don't really find this a convincing argument. I don't really care about what the director tr… | /r/MensRights | 11/03/18 06:11 PM |
| 1 | Why do people say 'The last Jedi' was feminist propaganda?Weirdly, perhaps, most MRAs really quite liked Wonder Woman. Feminists didn't like it because she's sexy. I thought feminists regarded Wonder Woman in the same way black people regard 'Black Panther'. That is to say that they think it is the best movie that is, was and ever be. As for the Star Wars film - I've heard it's infected with feminist/SJW nonsense by JJ Abrams because feminists can't see a creative franchise invented and created by men without wanting to get their greasy mits on it. I c… | /r/MensRights | 11/03/18 06:02 PM |
| 1 | Why do people say 'The last Jedi' was feminist propaganda?I hope you will feel better! | /r/MensRights | 11/03/18 05:58 PM |
| -1 | Why do people say 'The last Jedi' was feminist propaganda?I would argue it is slightly overthinking the whole thing. Maybe the script writers did intend for it to look like this but I think for me at least it didn't come across. I think it's about how it seems the female characters are all-powerful, all good, and can't make a mistake. I think the purple haired commander came out as a bitch. Even though it turned out she was a positive character, she still was kind of a bitch. They can't seem to do anything wrong. I thought almost everything Leia did wa… | /r/MensRights | 11/03/18 05:54 PM |
| 6 | Feminist Post I wanted to get your guys' thoughts onIt's annoying how feminists often use a lot of vague terms that they invented and only they know the definition of. What the hell does 'body fascism' mean? I never saw anyone who isn't just trolling saying 'She was wearing a short skirt so she had it coming' contrary to what the author suggested. Though it seems that this is exactly what the author of this message is saying: "Objectification promotes rape culture". IE The media makes men think that raping is ok. Which is not the case at all. I n… | /r/MensRights | 09/03/18 02:36 PM |
| 1 | Congratulations! This subreddit is listed by ONLINE HATE INDEX as hateful content. Top offenders: White rights, Men's rights, The Donald, First Amendment, Guns are cool. Courtesy of Anti-Defamation League (ADL) "Center for Technology & Society".Here is the article. If successful, CTS would then incorporate that algorithm into its work combatting hate of all kinds, and working with the tech industry to fight hate on their platforms. Translation: We will pressure the tech industry to silence opinions we don't like. Online communities have been described as the modern public square, a space for opinions to be expressed and voices to be heard. In reality, though, not everyone has equal access to this public square, and not everyone has the… | /r/MensRights | 09/03/18 01:46 AM |
| 2 | I posted in Two x ChromosomesI guess it's safe to say that I take back what I said about them being fair. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/18 01:08 PM |
| 2 | I posted in Two x ChromosomesNo joke. OP over there said she was having a problem. She has a male roommate whom she won't have sex with while she is sober. However, she would have sex with him if she is drunk and he is persistent. So this guy is frequently trying to encourage her to drink so that they would have sex. She says that she wants to stay friends with him but she doesn't want to have sex with him, however, if she drinks and he is persistent enough, she would eventually agree to have sex with him and he knows it, t… | /r/MensRights | 07/03/18 01:01 AM |
| 2 | I posted in Two x Chromosomesannnnnnd they just banned me on TwoXChromosomes for 'rule 1'. | /r/MensRights | 07/03/18 12:34 AM |
| 2 | I posted in Two x ChromosomesBecause your goal wasn't to have a discussion, it was to antagonize and troll them. Like I said, I don't think this should be a bannable offense but it was trolly... Maybe they should have banned you for a week or so, but not permanently. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/18 09:48 PM |
| 1 | I posted in Two x ChromosomesPerhaps. There is a misconception in female-majority subs that if you post in /r/MensRights you are literally the Devil. But I post here too and was not banned yet. (I guess I should stop tempting my luck...) | /r/MensRights | 06/03/18 09:46 PM |
| 1 | I posted in Two x ChromosomesI don't see anything wrong with this particularly, but it is a bit trolly. Sure posting something like this should not be a bannable offense, but it is a bit trolly indeed. Have you talked with the mods and asked them what's up? | /r/MensRights | 06/03/18 08:27 PM |
| 1 | I posted in Two x ChromosomesI wouldn't judge to hastily before I've seen the actual post. Like I said, I've been posting a lot in XX, and all of my comments don't reflect the feminist agenda. Yet I'm polite and I offer rational arguments to my points of view. And they didn't ban me nor did they ever warn me about something. I can't see them banning someone unless he was purposely trolling. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/18 07:40 PM |
| 1 | I posted in Two x ChromosomesI post in XX regularly and my posts are usually anti-feminists, I never got banned or even warned there. I have to say they treated me pretty fairly. So from how I was treated by them given the posts I've been making, I'm really skeptical that you did nothing wrong. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/18 07:14 PM |
| 1 | Feminist research inadvertently explains why actors get paid more than actresses.You're also getting tripped up by conflating two different contexts. "Lines of a single male vs. lines of a single female" and " lines of all males vs. lines of all females." Excuse me, but how is the 'Gender pay gap' calculated? You look at the overall pay of men, the overall pay of women and toss all other consideration to the wind. Someone brought up Mulan. She's the lead role. The villains and the jester are men. Jesters typically talk a lot, and the villains outnumber the lead. She has less… | /r/MensRights | 06/03/18 03:06 PM |
| 1 | Feminist research inadvertently explains why actors get paid more than actresses.Are you saying there is no correlation and causation between getting smaller roles and having less dialog and getting paid less? If you are in a smaller role you would have less dialog. If you are in a smaller role, you get paid less. Thus if you have less dialog, you get paid less. (Not always, but in the majority of cases.) | /r/MensRights | 06/03/18 02:21 PM |
| 1 | Feminist research inadvertently explains why actors get paid more than actresses.So paid less peanuts? Paid less hugs? You were definitely talking about money. Fewer. My point is that having less lines and getting paid less are not mutually exclusive at all. Indeed. That's why my OP clearly states: "I know that actors don't get paid by the number of lines they do." Also, that's why this post is labeled as 'Humor'. Actors are not getting paid by the number of lines they deliver. They are getting paid the amount their agent negotiated for them, which is partially influenced by… | /r/MensRights | 06/03/18 01:32 PM |
| 1 | Feminist research inadvertently explains why actors get paid more than actresses.I didn't claim they were talking about money. It's common knowledge that feminists usually complain about women getting paid less for doing the same amount of work. While this study doesn't talk about wages, it undermines the general Feminist claim that in Hollywood women get paid less than men for the same amount of work. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/18 03:16 AM |
| 2 | Feminist research inadvertently explains why actors get paid more than actresses.My main argument is that female roles tend to be the love interest. They don't need to have pull, be established or, in some cases, have any talent. The male lead needs to have all of that. Well, this is only true for old action movies. Where a female character is just an eye candy. Like Under Siege.. But not all movies are action movies. Also, there are plenty of action movies nowadays with female leads. Like 'Kill Bill' or Aliens. Nowadays you have movies like Hunger Games which had huge comme… | /r/MensRights | 05/03/18 04:43 PM |
| 2 | Feminist research inadvertently explains why actors get paid more than actresses.Sure, but you can't have it both ways... You either have: Women are getting paid less than men for the same amount of work. OR Women are getting cast in 'lesser' roles. Those are mutually exclusive propositions. Either women are getting paid less than men for the same amount of work, which means they are getting cast for the same amount of dialog. OR Women are getting cast in 'lesser' roles and thus not doing the same work as men. | /r/MensRights | 05/03/18 02:57 PM |
| 2 | Feminist research inadvertently explains why actors get paid more than actresses.That was the entire point of why they did it(the research) in the first place. | /r/MensRights | 05/03/18 01:38 PM |
| 11 | Feminist research inadvertently explains why actors get paid more than actresses.Indeed. Yet here it is even funnier. The research does indeed prove what it says it proves. There really is significantly more male dialog than female in movies. And by proving their intended premise it is also proves that actors work significantly more than actresses. | /r/MensRights | 05/03/18 03:55 AM |
| 1 | Harvey Weinstein Lawyer: Sex to Boost Film Career Is NOT RapeDid I say it was rape? | /r/MensRights | 05/03/18 03:44 AM |
| 6 | Harvey Weinstein Lawyer: Sex to Boost Film Career Is NOT RapeAs long as there's no discrimination I don't think it's breaking any laws. What if I ask for 1000$ only from male candidates? | /r/MensRights | 04/03/18 10:26 PM |
| 3 | Harvey Weinstein Lawyer: Sex to Boost Film Career Is NOT RapeSounds to me like extortion or asking for a bribe. | /r/MensRights | 04/03/18 08:35 PM |
| 9 | Harvey Weinstein Lawyer: Sex to Boost Film Career Is NOT RapeSo quid pro quo isn't illegal? So if I'm an interviewer at Google, and you come to an interview for a job and I say "If you give 1000$ I would make sure you will get hired and if you don't I'll make sure Google would never hire you. " This isn't illegal? | /r/MensRights | 04/03/18 07:11 PM |
| 33 | Harvey Weinstein Lawyer: Sex to Boost Film Career Is NOT Rape“If a woman decides that she needs to have sex with a Hollywood producer to advance her career and actually does it and finds the whole thing offensive, that’s not rape,” he told The Times. How is it any different from a woman who decides that she needs to have sex with her professor in order to get a better grade in college? I guess it all depends on what actually happened. If the woman seduced him then it's definitely not sexual assault, however, if he told the woman "If you want the job, suck… | /r/MensRights | 04/03/18 06:32 PM |
| 1 | Totally false feminist propaganda from the BBC. "Oscars 2018: Female-led Oscar films ‘rake in most cash". The films they have as female led are dubious, also no mention that nearly all had male directors!You are correct. I meant voters, not viewers. However, I would argue that IMDb voters are a good indication of what the demographics of the viewers are. For example in '50 Shades Of Grey' there is a much closer split between female and male voters (Ratio 1:1.3). I guess one could argue that IMDb users may be predominantly male so one would expect that all voter analysis in IMDb would be skewed to have more males. | /r/MensRights | 01/03/18 06:44 PM |
| 16 | Totally false feminist propaganda from the BBC. "Oscars 2018: Female-led Oscar films ‘rake in most cash". The films they have as female led are dubious, also no mention that nearly all had male directors!This is just a correlation and causation issue. While it's true that female-led movies brought the most money, that doesn't necessarily mean that they brought more money due to the fact that they are female-led. For example, Star Wars has a huge fanbase and it would have brought a lot of money even if it was hamster led. Also, wouldn't the fact that female-led movies make more money than male-led movies put a hole in the 'Patriarchy is keeping us down' narrative? If you look at the gender distri… | /r/MensRights | 01/03/18 04:35 PM |
| 3 | Your opinions on feminism.I meant Men Rights Activists. | /r/MensRights | 27/02/18 10:00 PM |
| 12 | Your opinions on feminism.Feminist forums ban dissent immediately. There's no room for nuance or explanation, it's either you're with us or you're against us; and you really should stop associating with your non-feminist friends. Cheer our heroes! Boo our villains! If the reliance on faith and feelings over facts didn't qualify Feminism as a twisted pseudo-religion, the way they chastise and excommunicate non-believers certainly speaks volumes. Exactly! | /r/MensRights | 27/02/18 08:30 PM |
| 9 | Your opinions on feminism.I think I'm just going to stop labelling myself as either side and support opinions that I agree with, without being in a contract with either side. There are problematic people on both sides, so I feel like this is the best way. I think this is a very sensible position that I adopt as well. | /r/MensRights | 27/02/18 08:23 PM |
| 11 | Your opinions on feminism.I'm sure your version exists though sadly I feel like the radical version is a very vocal part of feminism and it is what drives mainstream views about feminism. I think /r/feminism are radical for example. Part of the rules of their sub is that you basically have to agree with them in order to post or comment. This should tell you something. It's easy to see that there is no rule in this sub that says "You have to agree with MRA and all your post have to be supportive of the MRA." People who ar… | /r/MensRights | 27/02/18 08:12 PM |
| 4 | Im not usually a fan of r/menslib but i can get behind thisThe first time this law is used against an actual attacker he just needs to say he 'identifies as a female'. Problem solved. | /r/MensRights | 20/02/18 09:58 PM |
| 53 | How do we have more subs than r/feminismBecause they ban everyone who sneezes at them with the wrong look in their eyes. Case and point. | /r/MensRights | 16/02/18 07:06 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter