TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

customautosys Archive

View 3 posts and 36 comments by customautosys on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

The real enemy is those of the other gender who are unreasonable (as well as those of the same gender who enable them - can't understand why so many men are against other men and treat them badly).
/r/MensRights11/12/25 08:21 AM
0

Oh and to add to that. If the woman gets sole custody care and control I have never heard of a case where the man did not even have to pay a single cent of child maintenance. So much for "child maintenance is about the children" yeah - not the case when the male gets custody?
/r/MensRights10/12/25 02:44 PM
0

Yes overall it was still a relatively good outcome for him but I'm just surprised that she can still get any wife maintenance at all.
/r/MensRights10/12/25 02:11 PM
1

Is there even a country where it's acceptable to be a man anymore?
/r/MensRights10/12/25 12:53 PM
5

Divorce would be a real eye opener for him
/r/MensRights10/12/25 05:05 AM
2

I hope for success, conscription is a great evil and the greatest threat to world peace. The less people there are to fight, the lower the possibility there will be a war and even if there's a war, less people will die if the armies are smaller.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 02:32 PM
2

South Korea is improving. There is hope yet!
/r/MensRights09/12/25 02:28 PM
1

Don't forget hot + also rich
/r/MensRights09/12/25 12:26 PM
1

Yes, it's very hard to see why they don't say violence is always bad, regardless of the gender of the victim. There are cases of women abusing males, especially male children. Responsible women should make it clear that society should also be protected from female abusers. There are also women abusing other women or girls so it's in their own interest to also stand against violent women and not just violent men.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 12:16 PM
2

New Zealand does not sound like a great place to be for males too. I wonder if there's still any country which is male-friendly?
/r/MensRights07/12/25 09:41 AM
3

Either women also serve, or there should be no conscription. I don't know why there isn't a greater push to develop a complete remote controlled drone / robot army. That actually seems quite feasible nowadays and people might not mind serving as much if they are controlling a drone from a safe bunker.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 04:42 AM
3

Unpopular opinion: maybe what your brother is saying (that your sister should work and earn some money) is better for your brother in law. I am given the impression from what I've read that in the UK, a non-working woman has a higher chance of cleaning out the working man financially in the event that she wants to get rid of him and divorce (in many countries, a majority of divorces are started by the woman). Ensuring that the wife is a working mum bringing home a meaningful income could put the…
/r/MensRights11/11/25 08:37 AM
2

Singapore Marriage ceremony gone through fraudulently without lawful marriage 6C. Any person who dishonestly or fraudulently goes through the ceremony of being married, knowing that he or she is not as a result lawfully married, shall be guilty of an offence and shall on conviction be punished with imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years and shall also be liable to a fine not exceeding $10,000. However the Prosecution does have to prove dishonest or fraudulent intent.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 02:31 AM
8

It's good that where you are, you can have a marriage ceremony without getting a marriage certificate. Over here, it's illegal. I'm still scratching my head as to why you put the whole house in her name. Why not joint ownership or 50%?
/r/MensRights11/11/25 02:21 AM
0

Only for my wife (yes I know it's kind of an unpopular thing to be married here, what with MGTOW and all, but I've already been married more than 9 years). My wife would probably be very unhappy if I held the door for another woman or did anything like open a drink bottle they couldn't open or whatever.
/r/MensRights08/11/25 04:53 PM
1

Theoretically perhaps it might be possible, but practically it does not sound very plausible. Most of the time a gynocentric patriarchy results because the men consider the women a weaker sex worth protecting, but I have never heard of women ever viewing men in such a manner. I have never heard of any society of such a nature, have you? Gynocentric matriarchies I have heard of, I believe there are some polyandrous societies that are like that like the Mosuo in China.
/r/MensRights08/11/25 07:10 AM
1

Can you imagine a bunch of women in power wanting to use all their power to benefit men, and favouring men over women? I'm sorry, I just can't. Too difficult to imagine at least based on the current situation.
/r/MensRights08/11/25 06:47 AM
1

I would say androcentric matriarchy sounds like pretty much impossible to ever have though.
/r/MensRights07/11/25 10:59 AM
6

Won't use any such rubbish, apart from being biased it's probably not fit for any purpose.
/r/MensRights07/11/25 12:51 AM
1

OK. I do not know enough about your legal system. I hope you get the best possible outcome whatever that could be.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 04:18 PM
1

Is there no way at all of challenging the charge? Sounds a little odd to me, but I don't know the system in your country.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 04:14 PM
1

Wow! I'd like to visit Kenya 1 day.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 01:48 PM
20

Yet when women berate men that's not unpaid emotional labour for the man to bear with that sort of nonsense. It appears that it's a no win situation for men. Want a wife who earns less but does the housework? Misogynist. Want a wife who earns more and the man does the housework instead? Freeloader, bum, whatever. So what do women want? I think they just want to hurl insults.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 01:45 PM
1

I hope you fight it all the way, take it to trial, and win.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 09:32 AM
2

It's just ridiculous how male violence against women and girls is wrong but it seems other forms of violence are not. Shouldn't it be that all violence is condemned?
/r/MensRights06/11/25 09:30 AM
2

I think the worst thing ever is that the "lucky boy" will have the "luck" of being saddled with child support. It's absolute rubbish that a rape victim can be financially penalised for being raped, and guess who that money goes to? The rapist! If anything the female rapists should be paying tons of financial damages to the underaged male victims for the rest of their lives.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 09:17 AM
1

I agree about conscription but I think World Toilet Day was not deliberate, it happened to be the founding date of the World Toilet Organisation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Sim
/r/MensRights06/11/25 09:09 AM
3

Singapore is a democratic dictatorship if I may say so. It's democratic in a sense, as around 65% do in fact vote for and support the current government, I cannot deny that. That was a landslide win by any margin in any country with actual competitive elections. That includes a large number of men who for some reason have no interest in the fact that they face a huge amount of legalised discrimination against themselves. However, if you define democracy not just as majority rule but also as prot…
/r/MensRights06/11/25 08:00 AM
1

That is wrong because if you are horrifically beaten and raped by other prisoners in prison those other prisoners are committing a crime. Whereas if you are caned that is an official form of torture which is mandated by the authorities. There is also no treatment for the caning apart from having your butt sprayed with iodine. There is no "credit" for having suffered the punishment, the fact that you have suffered a punishment like caning is regarded negatively against the victim of the caning be…
/r/MensRights06/11/25 07:49 AM
3

If men can be chemically castrated then female sex offenders should also be made to take a pill that stops them having any pleasure when having sex.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 07:39 AM
2

This is not true in Singapore because in Singapore the caning (adult prison caning and not school caning) definitely breaks the skin and causes permanent lifelong scarring. https://www.deseret.com/1994/5/2/19106573/singapore-publishes-details-about-caning That includes the American kid who was caught for vandalism and described his permanent scars. Males and females can both commit drug trafficking and vandalism, but the female drug traffickers and vandals never get caned. There is no equal just…
/r/MensRights06/11/25 07:35 AM
1

But the Court can also override / strike down clauses in a commercial contract, that's why most commercial contracts have severability clauses.
/r/MensRights02/11/25 12:20 PM
3

It's interesting to think what the cause of action could be. In Tang Liang Hong v Lee Kuan Yew [1997] 3 SLR (R) 576, damages were awarded for defamation by way of police reports. But in this case the extent of publication of the false rape report in the first instance appears to be very limited. I suppose an action for a statutory tort under s. 11 of the Protection from Harassment Act could be considered, but then again, there would only be a single instance of the act complained of. No compensa…
/r/MensRights28/10/25 11:32 AM
1

This is not true. Pre-nups are given evidentiary weight, it's just that the Court has an overriding discretion as to whether the pre-nup is just and equitable. https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/judge-reject-claim-maintenance-university-fees-wife-5332071
/r/MensRights28/10/25 10:55 AM
0

No offence taken, and I hope I didn't offend you as well. Sometimes I'm a stickler for semantics.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/22 07:52 AM
13

Only had sex once != virgin. The definition of virgin is 0 times. Not saying that it's better or worse. You can create a new word for a person who has had sex exactly 1 time if you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/22 05:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter