TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

cynar Archive

View 0 posts and 49 comments by cynar on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
19

First step is to recognise that there is a major problem. You seem to have done that. The next is to recognise that you are being sucked into a cult, using age old tactics. They break down your self confidence and support networks, then tell you the old way out is deeper in. First steps, cut all contact, both direct and indirect. It's a gravity well, the closer you are the more it pulls, and so the harder it is to fight. No reading websites, no messaging people involved. The next is to accept th…
/r/seduction06/08/22 11:23 AM
8

On its own, it's often fairly useless. However it can help form a pattern of behaviour. Either with the complainant over multiple instances or over multiple complainants. It's a lot harder to demonstrate a pattern retrospectively than to get it documented as unacceptable as you go.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 12:25 PM
1

Best way to do it. Just set it up so the idea of what to do comes up 'naturally', then turn it into a fixed date. It's not desperate or needy if done right, it is forward and shows interest in her (most girls are quite insecure about whether a boy likes them). It also makes them invest in you while there feelings are strongest. It is also harder, emotionally, for them to flake if they we looking at you when they agreed. Phone and text are a lot more impersonal and easier to bail from later.
/r/seduction01/02/16 09:43 AM
3

Best method is the triangle system. Let your eyes flick between both theirs and their mouth. It holds attention and eye contact, without being intimidating or creepy.
/r/seduction15/09/12 12:04 PM
1

When I have computer access again, I will. (Currently working at the Olympics) From memory though, only half the babies had there outfits swapped. The toy preference followed the outfit. There might be an underlying native preference but, in this experiment, it was overwhelmed by culture.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 06:11 PM
2

To be fair, that has been shown to be mostly imposed subconsciously by guardians. Can't link to the study from my phone, but it was along the lines of dressing girl babys as boys and vice versa. They were then left with adult supervisors who were told it was a study into how babes react with strangers. The baby's ended up with a toy bias based on what the adults thought they were, rather than their true gender.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 02:49 PM
6

Just an FYI. Introvert and Extrovert don't refer to wither you are outgoing or reserved, though they often correlate. They refer ,for want of a better explanation, to how you recover mentally. An extrovert gains energy from being in a crowd. Working alone tends to drain them, while being in a group makes them thrive. An introvert gains energy from personal contemplation. They tire in a group, but recover when they have more personal space. It is perfectly possible to be a loud, outgoing introver…
/r/seduction03/06/12 11:44 AM
6

The issue is, it's VERY hard to render a man infertile in a temporary way. Biologically, the male body is a sperm delivery system. Therefore it's primary function is VERY robust. We have many ways of rendering a man totally infertile, unfortunately, most are permanent. We can also render a guy fairly infertile, on a temporary basis. Unfortunately, 'fairly' does not cut it when it's 1 shot=1 kid! The difficulty is doing it fully, but temporary, with no serious side effects.
/r/MensRights08/08/11 01:47 PM
1

The irony mark is near enough perfect for this؟
/r/MensRights22/07/11 10:08 AM
7

Rape is grossly underreported as is. For every false accusation I bet there are a dozen rapes. Obviously I have no facts to back this up, so I would love it if someone could correct me. Rape is grossly overreported as is. For every rape I bet there are a dozen false accusations. Obviously I have no facts to back this up, so I would love it if someone could correct me.
/r/MensRights26/01/11 12:58 AM
8

The case against the woman CANNOT be simply that she couldn't prove rape. It MUST be to show both active lying, knowledge of the consequences of her actions and lack of coercion. Proving those 3 is the equivalent of female rape. In which case, sentence like a ton of bricks. But we mustn't risk pushing for a move too far the other way.
/r/MensRights26/01/11 12:56 AM
0

Personally, if I asked them out, I tend to pay. It's all down to how you do it though. Keep it low key when you go to pay. If she acts like it was you job to pay, don't bother with a second date. If you meet some resistance ("You sure?" etc) I love to throw out the line "I've got the meal, you can get the tip." or something along those lines. Depending how much they tip, it's a wonderful judge of what sort of person they are. Also, you tend to get both the benefits of being a 'gentleman' by payi…
/r/seduction24/01/11 06:53 PM
1

Testosterone makes the body divert resources to muscle bulk etc (looking 'manly). This diverts energy from the immune system etc. Therefore, in order to code with an infection requires the body to divert a greater % of resources from normal use to the immune response. This is what makes you feel tired and ill. That and the social response of men is a lot more toggle like. Either 'fine' or 'ill'. So the % of 'bad' illness seems a lot higher since the guy hides the more mild ones totally. As for e…
/r/MensRights23/01/11 05:54 PM
5

The issue I see from this is less feminism and more the fact that services industries tend to only churn wealth rather than generate it. A strong economy need to maximise the flow of wealth. Churning does this well, so long as the net inflow of wealth exceeds the net outflow. Service industries tend not to help on this front. Eventually there's not enough wealth to churn and the services industries fail. The big issue is that women tend to opt for service industry (white collar) jobs over wealth…
/r/MensRights24/12/10 07:48 PM
2

By the sound of it a jobs-body bureaucrat wasn't doing their job and got burned when there boss got a phone call from a local paper.
/r/MensRights15/12/10 04:16 PM
3

Avoid, avoid, avoid! If your nervous, it's way too easy to overshoot the mark!
/r/seduction13/12/10 03:44 AM
1

The problem is that any review will be jumped on by the nutjobs to try and reduce the number of 'rapists' who 'get away with it' due to lack of 'evidence'. The woman's word should be enough!!!!
/r/MensRights08/12/10 10:51 PM
1

Remember, most real rapes have a psychological component too them. The mere fact that it 'could' happen would deter the victim (Same effect as the lottery, it 'could' be you). However I agree with you, the whole system could use an examination and an overhaul, unfortunately it's unlikely to happen.
/r/MensRights08/12/10 12:33 PM
2

only once convicted, I believe
/r/MensRights08/12/10 12:28 PM
12

girls can play in boys hockey, but not vice versa. A classic example of sexism. Reverse the gender, and it would have the feminists up in arms!
/r/MensRights17/11/10 12:31 PM
5

Musky is good, BO is bad. BO is caused by bacteria feeding on old sweat. You need to shower enough to keep the levels down. A useful trick if BO's a general problem, mouthwash. It's designed to wipe out smell causing bacteria. Use a cloth to wipe anywhere that generally smells while showering and rinse off. Instant manly scent with little/no BO.
/r/seduction12/11/10 11:39 AM
1

Don't bother giving her your number if she doesn't give you hers. The only time it works is if you don't even bother asking her for her's. It's a physiological reversal game. In her eyes, you have to be so confident in yourself, you've walked off leaving her with the only way to move things on (by calling you). If you have her number/facebook etc, it will not work. Even then, it wont work on quite a few girls. When it does work, however, it does amazing things. Suddenly, they are the one chasing…
/r/seduction02/11/10 01:01 PM
19

Generally, she's not interested in you directly, she just wants to prove to herself she is still attractive. As soon as you start showing proper interest, that proves it for her and she looses interest. I know a couple of guys how have played that sort to a one night stand, but not much more. Personally I find they are way too much effort, just use them as DHV, it's what they are doing with you themselves anyhow.
/r/seduction02/11/10 11:52 AM
3

Guildford At least I'm not the only one over this way!
/r/seduction01/11/10 02:17 AM
1

Women's muscles tend to be keyed to fine control, while men's are geared for power. While a woman can gear her body for power (or a man for control) It requires a lot more effort than an otherwise equal man would need.
/r/MensRights31/10/10 10:04 AM
3

In which case you still get to avoid sleeping in a cold bed on your own! :)
/r/seduction21/10/10 07:03 PM
1

As I said, best bet is practice. Either in front of a mirror or in person. The mirror thing will look and feel ridiculous, at least initially, but keep at it. Just so you know though, a quick grin on the way out the door isn't really long enough. It need to be about a minute for the feedback to kick in properly. This will make you smile naturally a lot more, as well as training your muscles in producing a natural smile on command. Confidence comes from using it when it makes no difference. Test …
/r/seduction14/10/10 08:29 AM
2

Question is do you really want a girl who's likely to keep swinging past you in the same way?
/r/seduction14/10/10 12:51 AM
2

Confidence: A case of fake it and it becomes real. Best training is to put yourself in a situation where you can act ridiculous overconfident without long term consequences either way. Lets you practice being confident without repercussions Walking up to totally random people for a chat works well. You don't care either you get burned or not, because you'll likely not see them again either way. Size: All about projection. Look people in the eye when talking. Keep your arms to your sides generall…
/r/seduction14/10/10 12:45 AM
1

Most people just see you interacting, not how the interactions went. Other than the ego damping, it's still generally good.
/r/seduction14/10/10 12:09 AM
1

In the right situation, yes. Most girls aren't used to having to chase the guy. It changes the playing field quite a bit once that mentality kicks in.
/r/seduction13/10/10 11:40 PM
3

And how does that not make loads of money for the people running the 'for profit' prison?
/r/MensRights12/10/10 01:02 AM
1

The point of what I was saying is that a greater number of males will want to go into science that females. Assuming IQ is a good proxy for scientific ability, that ratio will be about 2/1. What you call interest, is generally a result of cultural pressure.
/r/MensRights13/09/10 08:10 AM
1

I agree with you, we are not there yet. From what I remember at Uni, the ratio was about 10-1 or worse (physics) with professors etc. It takes time to change, so that might just be lag from more recent changes, but even so, there is still work to do.
/r/MensRights13/09/10 08:06 AM
1

Depends which scale we are talking about as well. Though 149 is VERY high on most scales. I prefer using percentiles, it allows for cross test comparison.
/r/MensRights13/09/10 08:04 AM
2

You have to be careful with this, I'm using IQ as a proxy for scientific ability. Not everyone with a high IQ is good at science, and not everyone who is good at science has a high IQ. Would still be worth a look, but there would be quite a few confounding factors to account for.
/r/MensRights13/09/10 08:01 AM
1

On a side note, Lions and wolves also invest a lot of time in their offspring. There are several competing reproductive strategies that humans use, however. The most relevant here is the shoot and run. Where one partner does a runner after conception. Since it's a lot easier for the male to do this than the female, you end up with a lot more single mums than single dads from it. Also remember that the difference does not have to be major the difference in Standard Deviation is only around 7% the…
/r/MensRights13/09/10 07:58 AM
0

The ratio is 140+ if you want to play with it in open office calc, the formula is =1-(NORMDIST(C8;$C$4;$D$4;1)) C8=cutoff point C4=Mean D4=Standard Deviation That will give you the percentage of the population at or above a given value (in this case IQ)
/r/MensRights12/09/10 09:56 PM
5

Evolution wise, there are good reasons to expect men to excel slightly more. It all comes down to the currency of evolution, prodigy. Excelling is a risky business. Breaking from the norm could just as often be detrimental as advantageous. If a woman does above average, her child rearing ability is still limited by biology. If she does well below average then it drops off. If the average is close to maximum, then the pay-off for attempting it is poor. A man's reproductive ability is only limited…
/r/MensRights12/09/10 07:11 PM
5

140 is 72/28. About 2.5 to 1 male to female I used IQ for want of a better measurement. It's one of those measurements that is perfect nowhere but useful across the board. I'd imagine there would be a link between high IQ and scientific ability as well (though I've no figures to back that up with).
/r/MensRights12/09/10 07:01 PM
9

Just did some figure playing with IQs (yes i know, but it's the best proxy i could come up with the figures for). Based on figures of Gender | Mean | SD Male | 103.08 | 14.54 Female | 101.41 | 13.55 (taken from here) And assuming a cutoff of 130 you would expect a ratio of 65/35 male/female. Does anyone have the current ratio working in science to hand tom compare it to. In theory, any deviation from that ratio would be social pressure effects as opposed to natural ability. Note: results are onl…
/r/MensRights12/09/10 06:11 PM
4

More like he finally got it to a judge who actually looked at it and thought WTF!?! Before actually doing there job.
/r/MensRights09/09/10 11:58 PM
4

Better solution, sales tax based on % of payment, with a flat rebate (say $10K). $10,000 a year is a LOT to someone on low income but comparatively little to those at the top. Also has the side effect of making illegal workers a lot less cost effective (assuming a company has to prove the expenditure was wages or be taxed on it).
/r/MensRights27/08/10 04:11 PM
1

Fire will only destroy the controlling electronics, not the platters themselves. Welding thermite would likely do the job, but applying that reliably to the patters themselves would be quite hard.
/r/MensRights20/08/10 05:11 PM
1

While drilling a few holes will make the drive none functional, not much data will be destroyed. Unless you scan the drill all over the surface, most of the data can still be recovered. But in that case, an angle grinder is just a quicker version. Also remember, if the police think your hiding evidence of child pornography they will make EVERY effort to recover the data!
/r/MensRights20/08/10 05:07 PM
1

Have you ever actually tried to destroy an HDD? A hammer will destroy the drive, but not the platters. Not much short of total disassembly and meticulous use of an angle grinder on the platter surfaces would reliably do it. Even shattered platters still have most of their data, and while it's not easy to recover it, the police have methods to do it.
/r/MensRights20/08/10 07:34 AM
3

BAD idea! All she has to do is blow the whistle and not only is their kiddy porn, he he tried to distroy the evidence!
/r/MensRights20/08/10 12:24 AM
3

It's worth checking the internet router. Most have some form of throughput monitoring. Some even look for keywords to log. They also log the time and source of the event. All he then has to do is report finding it on the router logs and pass it to either his lawyer or the poice directly. If his wife is the only one home when the logs were made... Also, it's a lot easier to explain a missing router than a missing computer.
/r/MensRights20/08/10 12:20 AM
4

I agree. When they cant even get the victim to testify :/ All they can say for sure is the guy ended up with a shoe in his eye, and no-one involved can say why.
/r/MensRights04/08/10 11:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter