TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

cynwrig Archive

View 3 posts and 822 comments by cynwrig on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
26

I've been to shantytowns in third world countries. Once I heard something unsettlingly familiar and peeked in. What did I see? Little girls gathered around a TV with a satellite feed watching iCarly on Disney Channel. So forget it guys. The poison has been cropdusted everywhere.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/15 03:22 PM
1

Perhaps he owed someone else a bigger favor. How did you guarantee he was in your pocket? What was his interest in voting your way outside of your 'favor bank'? What was your backup plan if he went off the rail? Eyeball him to death? You have a data point on the guy. He doesn't have a sense of loyalty and reciprocity outside of 'what's in it for me'. That's valuable info. My advice? Hit the gym. Play it cool and be civil. Don't go out of the way to avenge this injury, because that's what he's go…
/r/TheRedPill04/11/14 05:01 PM
3

Exactly. What instead of a "hi beautiful" they give you an energy drink and claim that it helps you 'run faster and jump higher'. Is that harrassment?
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 10:37 PM
1

I know some engineers and hedge fund guys who are great singers and musicians. > Some of them take local gigs and perform at local clubs and bars for dirt cheap. They don't care about the money, they just love music. Cheerleaders love to dance and perform. And they love the exclusive access they get to their favorite sports team. Imagine if there were no such thing as cheerleaders, but instead they had local bands and singers that can perform during halftime or commercial breaks. For the musicia…
/r/TheRedPill29/10/14 01:23 PM
2

I always figured she was the 'Al Sharpton' of Feminism. She hasn't jumped the shark yet by hopping into a plastic bag full of shit to smear gamers, but its still early in the spectacle.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 06:08 PM
42

She should compile her adventures doing this into a book - "Around the World in 80 Lays".
/r/TheRedPill28/10/14 05:45 PM
4

Her rights: Decide to let you have sex and the conditions in which that sex takes place. To have an abortion - or not. To spend nine months making a baby. To decide if she wants to be a mother or not ( give baby up for adoption ). To decide if and when she wants you to be recognized as the father ( depends on state ) Your rights: Accept her offer of sex. Not that it matters. If she stole your sperm, induced you to orgasm despite your objections, took advantage of your inexperience due to being a…
/r/MensRights16/10/14 02:08 PM
0

Whevever anyone starts lauding eugenics, I can't help but think of Charles II of Spain - the product of the Habsburg family breeding the 'superior leader' Human eugenics has been a failure - a mix of bad science and/or bad policy. We already know how to boost IQ worldwide - give everyone a proper diet. Less poor people - redistribute money. Sure they lack the charm of forced sterilizations, and genocide but you know, we can't please everybody.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 11:55 PM
11

Don't ignore the signs, guys And do you have any words of wisdom for those guys out there thinking "I can weather the storm with the power of love. I can fix her with my strength/patience/love"? Because we all know there is some guy out there thinking that after reading your warning. Right?
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 08:42 PM
9

Women view their willingness to compromise and live in a way that allows their husband to pursue a career as helping his career, so they should reap some of the benefits. Huh. Really? Her hubby gets promotions by meeting goals and doing projects that has a measurable outcome. How is her contribution measured? If the kids turn out shtty, does she get less alimony during divorce? What if she contributes nothing to the marriage for whatever reason (lazy, idle rich, whatever). Does she get nothing? …
/r/TheRedPill17/07/14 05:20 AM
3

What says TRP? I'd advise him not to think of it as an expensive ring, but rather a cheap lesson on how the rich stay rich.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/14 04:30 AM
4

Life imitating art son, life imitating art.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 03:21 AM
2

Maintain frame. Handle it with humor. "You are throwing us out? That fat guy in drag started it." If she is going to hide behind her pussy pass, take it away. Refuse to acknowlege her feminity. Refer to her as 'the ugly dude', 'neckbeard' or 'fatboy'. Laugh about it to the bouncer. "The problem is some guys are always trying to pick fights then go cry to you guys before they get their ass kicked." And toss in a neghit on the bouncer, "I can't believe you fell for that dude's line. Like anyone wo…
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 03:20 AM
1

How about a "sexual consent dead man's switch"? Its a grip that the woman sqeezes while she consents. If she releases the switch, a siren starts to wail and a booming voice announces "CONSENT WITHDRAWN!". This turns on a winch which reels in the collar which is fastened to the male's ankle or about his neck. The leash drags him out of the bed, across the bedroom and through the window where he will be suspended in midair. A speaker will announce "Potential Rapist Incapacitated. Alert Authorities…
/r/MensRights01/07/14 12:01 AM
5

Another game is "Don't Shoot The Sheriff" or something like that. The class stands in a circle and the sheriff stands in the middle with a "gun." They point at someone in the circle and "shoot." If the person doesn't duck they're dead, if they do, then the people on each side have to shoot each other. The person who shoots last dies. The last two people do that ten paces thing while the sheriff counts down. The first word the sheriff says that isn't a number means that they have to twirl around …
/r/MensRights17/06/14 11:01 PM
3

Any guy who is rich and only gives his kids the bare minimum is a total scumbag in my book. What if that is his lifestyle and he believes that success comes from working and struggle? What if he doesn't trust his ex-spouse? What if the money was earned in a profession that creates wealth in the short term but causes long term medical bills and expenses? Are you sure the guy's a scumbag? Are you really that comfortable judging from afar, telling people how to allocate their money or deciding how …
/r/MensRights16/06/14 11:32 PM
27

Security deposit her. If she behaves, she gets her money back.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 12:50 PM
3

Perhaps she is hinting that the Clintons should assist in leveling the field by adopting more female journalists. That way Miss Amy Weiss-Meyer-Clinton ( Or Clinton-Weiss-Meyer - always give the money making surname top billing! ) can assist in making a mark in journalism for women with a big fat paycheck as well. The Clintons can easily adopt at least a dozen young ladies to balance the scales, and there's more than enough Tweets for them to read on the air in a very, serious fashion, for all o…
/r/MensRights15/06/14 03:06 AM
0

Redpill on race: Your religion/skin color/ethnic group is not a crutch. Don't use it to say "I" can't, and don't dare use it to tell another man that "he" can't.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 05:42 PM
18

Not even hollywood actresses are above pulling the old have your current boyfriend ambush your ex when he stops by to drop off the kids scam.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 04:27 AM
0

He should have called her a piece of shit the supreme gentlewoman and stopped responding
/r/MensRights29/05/14 04:20 AM
4

Right now I just finished up my semester a different university. I am no longer in ROTC because they will not let me join again because the Universitys decision is on my ROTC records and I cant get that changed. I am still in the National Guard but that is only because the discharge paperwork from them is slower and I could be discharged any day now. Bring your congressman into this. Their staff will know the right points to apply pressure to get this situation fixed.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 12:54 AM
6

Well any feminist who has a position as an editor is now linking mens rights with him. Let them. The harder they lie, the harder the blowback. These hacks are just setting themselves up to be the future Jayson Blaires or Janet Cookes the next time there is a slow news day.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 02:06 AM
9

Before feminism: Man shoots up campus because women won't have sex with him - he is labelled a criminal. After feminism: Man shoots up campus because women won't have sex with him - he is labelled a criminal - along with all men. Yes. I can certainly see how feminism is 'necessary'. Thanks for clearing that up.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 03:31 PM
1

Its a shame the boss didn't show the father of the cheater the video - on a widescreen tv to the entire coffee shop. He would have graduated to "Epic Boss of Legends".
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 04:36 AM
17

I'm sorry but are you really looking down your nose at "Tumble-tier feminists" as if reddit-tier MRA's are some select group of distinguished intellectuals. Are you not sitting in an armchair? Removes reading glasses, lowers brandy snifter. Why yes. Yes I am. Swirls snifter, savors gentle sip of Yoo-Hoo.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 03:29 AM
2

Get your manager to ban her from the store. She might try to return the sweater on another shift. So pull pictures of her from the security cameras and put up posters near register to put other cashiers on notice of her fraudulent activity. And if the customers can see it as well...
/r/MensRights17/05/14 01:11 PM
2

Why shouldn't I get up in arms when impoverishment, social injustice or being in the third world are only problems when they impact women?
/r/MensRights11/05/14 06:33 PM
3

If that was truly money for the child, why not deposit the money into an account for the child, which they can access at 18? Why not send the money to a third party who delivers car seats, baby food, bottles, diapers and whatever else is needed, directly to the mother's house? Because kids can't vote. Women can, and do, and have PACS and political organizations to make sure that they get that money without an equal amount of accountability.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 02:08 AM
1

This would make sense for not only white men in Korea, but any guys who decide to date outside of the culture/area they are familiar with. Insiders might know the 'danger signs' to watch for that the 'new fish' would miss. But guys here might argue that those local rules of thumb are irrelevant and are a crutch for blue pill types that don't want to put any effort into themselves or their frame. YMMV.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 12:34 AM
2

Whose retarded idea was it to put police officers in schools anyway? It was from the same generation that gave us "Don't trust anyone under 30" and spitting in soldiers faces. That was for their youth. For your youth it's turning the schools into Megacity one with Judge Dredd wanabees and their zero-tolerance policies.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 08:30 PM
3

Too much of this shit lately and it makes me want to sub out and never come back Maybe someone could set up a 'racist_redpill' for those wanting to "improve their sexual strategies and self image by putting other people down".
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 02:10 AM
-3

Well, what did you think was going to happen when you poked that skunk? Racists are liars They will lie to you, about you, to other people and to themselves. Its their coping mechanism. With luck they will become men and grow out of it.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 01:48 AM
8

My friend is an Arab, with black skin and Muslim. I was like "you can't be hated more than that". Does he come up to strangers in the library and try to rope them into his multi-level marketing chain? If so, then yes. Yes he can.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 11:53 PM
5

What do you want to wear today? White Knight Armor Where do you want to go today? The Internet Forsooth! You don your spotless virtual armor and wield your vorpal +1 keyboard. Into the dread forests of Reddit you tread, hoping to win a fair maiden's hand fighting dread neckbeards and fedora wearers. Men think you are a tool, women think you are a patronizing at best, a 'nice guy' at worst. YOU LOSE
/r/MensRights27/04/14 11:26 AM
6

He should be hanged, drawn and quartered for his evil deeds. That's what he gets for not tipping the stage dancers.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 10:30 PM
10

Starts playing "You Can Leave Your Hat On" over P.A. And give it up for our Homeroom Teacher, 'Mercedes'....
/r/MensRights26/04/14 06:54 PM
1

Everyone is pro-life. Just some of us trust that people can manage their own health decisions without government or society butting in.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 11:10 AM
14

2) Avoid violence. I wonder what went through her mind when he was posturing, and I smiled at him and declined. Had I started throwing punches, I would have gotten myself in serious legal trouble. I probably would've lost the fight, embarrassing myself and getting a cold jail cell for the weekend instead of a blowjob. 3) Bring a condom. Alpha move - tell the beta orbiter to be a 'real bro' and 'get us some condoms at the store.' After that, the only thing you say to him is 'where are my condoms'…
/r/TheRedPill14/04/14 01:33 AM
5

If you start your own consulting gig from home there is no reason you couldn't balance both those desires. You might want to investigate this option while you are still in school and can take advantage of all the resources available to you.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 07:40 PM
1

Haters gonna hate.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 07:26 PM
2

I would boycott it for being an Irish pub with a DJ.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 07:25 PM
1

Golly, I'll bet that article took a lot of effort to write. The author went through all eight colors in his jumbo pack of crayons to get it done.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 06:51 PM
2

Yes, some of the most sexiest men on the web are at /r/mensrights I knew having my neckbeard detailed and groomed twice daily would pay off.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 04:39 PM
6

I'm cataloging that thought under 'half-baked garbage'.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 12:49 PM
3

If you don't like submissions, downvote them. Problem solved? Problem solved. Next.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 12:21 AM
3

Instead of a sit-in, you can call it a 'lift-in'.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 12:49 AM
43

I think you can teach boys to be respectful and you can expect them to control themselves -- especially middle school students. You really disagree? I am going to very gently step out of your framed argument and answer your question with a question - why are we holding boys (sigh again) to a higher standard than the girls?
/r/MensRights03/04/14 02:03 AM
6

There isn't a single mother around who doesn't have a pitiful tale of woe and sorrow about how awful and "abusive" her ex was. In most cases, it's all bullshit. And that's the problem - she married someone so awesome that she's going to have trouble looking like the 'victim' when she swings onto another branch. It's going to take extra work if it is at all possible to make him look like the villian, and she hates it.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/14 08:58 PM
7

Or would you prefer that some men get a free pass at fucking over their child because they can't look rationally at things ? What?
/r/MensRights01/04/14 04:51 PM
16

Don't mock them. They earned the right to wear those banana berets. Philipino special forces are famous for never taking that banana off during combat exercises and operations. Amateurs marvel at the Gurkahs. Pros marvel at the brave men of the Banana Berets. Fighting soldiers from the sky. Fearless men who jump and die. Men who mean just what they say. The brave men of the Banana Beret....
/r/MensRights01/04/14 12:08 PM
6

I think they are afraid it will create a breed of 'super rapists' that know how to counter self-defence skills. Then they would have to have a course on self-defence defence, and a follow up course for self-defence defence defence ( self-defence*defence2 ). Eventually the economy collapses due to everyone teaching or learning self-defence skills. Thanks a lot feminists!
/r/MensRights30/03/14 08:03 PM
3

Identify the instigators and loudmouths and ringleaders in the crowd. If you have to put up posters offering rewards for their identities. Bill them for the cost of their actions.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 08:36 PM
7

The city is deploying a team of psychologists and therapists to give her the talking to of a lifetime. And perhaps some aromatherapy candles for esteem building.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 07:36 PM
1

It is puerile attention whoring wrapped in the veneer of legitimacy by claiming it 'brings awareness'. It used to be that if I banged my girlfriend on an Addam's Family pinball game in a busy pool hall I would be called an exhibitionist. But now I can say I am "raising awareness - about the right flipper being stuck" and its 'he is so in touch, and thoughtful'.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 01:14 AM
0

Now that I think about it, I've seen more feminists talking about circumcision as opposed to sexism in religion. And religious leaders are more like a 'patriarchy' than any of the average guys they heap scorn and vitriol upon. So why haven't feminists been holding their feet to the fire? Its almost like both groups have some sort of unwritten agreement. Feminist will turn a blind eye to alpha-types in religion, and they are usually the worst in scamming and abusing women. Chuch leaders in turn k…
/r/MensRights26/03/14 12:38 AM
5

Hate to sound cynical, but his parents are rich, right?
/r/MensRights17/03/14 02:48 PM
11

I personally don't feel "American Pie" would be a coming of age movie unless the main character at least made his family a pie to replace the one he ruined. The fact that his dad kinda took it all in stride might make it a movie that falls in that genre of "Failure to Come of Age" . Porky's is a coming of age movie because it starts with one of the characters getting his ass kicked by his loser dad for not being racist enough. It ends with him beating his dad's ass because he has decided that he…
/r/TheRedPill17/03/14 02:27 PM
79

I hope he considers a law suit against each of the members of the Conduct Board as well. They made a choice to join this board and ignore the findings of professionals. I feel there should be some sort of penalty for this kind of hubris.
/r/MensRights17/03/14 11:32 AM
1

I'm not sure if she is borrowing from Star Wars or Groundhog day.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 01:29 PM
10

Officials from Buncombe County Schools, I'm not surprised. This is the county that put the word "bunkum" in the dictionary. I am mighty pleased to see their elected officials are working hard to stay true to their oratory traditions.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 01:16 PM
4

Evidently they recently changed their mascot from the maroon tiger to the white knight. Keep tilling at those windmills male feminists.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 04:14 PM
19

No fathers = no patriarchy.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 01:47 PM
1

What else am I going to mutulate my thisrt with? I an't drinkin from no toilet!
/r/MensRights12/03/14 01:44 PM
6

Work for it... you know, that's a good point. What is she doing with her day that she could not get a job? I can imagine an ex beauty model can make good coin as a spokesperson or at least awesome tips at Applebee's. If she was a guy they would make her work to support her children's 13K lifestyle or go to jail. Shouldn't she be kicking in a little coin rather than,... well, socializing with the neighbors?
/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 05:36 PM
9

It could be badly researched history, the history of bad, the history of badness, subpar history classes and lectures, a study of the development of Michael Jackson's megahit album or even a discussion of the tampering of linux history logs. But instead its just about bits of history they don't like and want to exise. Yawn Maybe they should have called it, 'The Memory Hole'. Not that this fact will stop me from going there and asking how much studio time went into reworking "Smooth Criminal". Bu…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 04:13 PM
5

Well, I'm not sure what kind of 'bad history' they are claiming MRA's are trying to push. But I'm all for a 'badhistory' group not being satisfied with talking about 'bad history', but also trying to duplicate it with their own witchhunts, censorship, black lists and litmus tests. Its like online performance art, and I fuckin love it. Think I'll sneak in and try to coax them into loyalty oaths and a good old fashioned purge. Ciao!
/r/MensRights10/03/14 03:57 PM
0

Is this surprising? Nobody wants to watch a bloviating, feminist cow. googles "bloviating feminist cow porn" clicks 'images' link stumbles about wildly, screaming for an eyewash station.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 12:04 PM
6

But would SNL be able to recognize a joke? I don't think so. We might have to have a workshop for them so they can recognize a joke. Here's some topics we can cover for them: Understanding humor. What is a Joke? Smiles. What they are and how to identify them. Brevity and you. Or, 'the skit's too damn long'. How to make a joke. Recognizing laughter. Comedy killers. Are you one?
/r/MensRights10/03/14 06:08 AM
6

Only an MRA can simultaneously argue that fathers are important while advocating that a man should be able to walk away. Some would say that is a sign of a first rate intelligence. I'd be flattered if those examples you used were mutually exclusive, but they aren't - are they? But you know what's really important? That men don't get falsely accused, because you know there's nothing he can go to stop it like not fuck crazy women. Sounds like victim blaming. Perhaps we can just tear a sheet off th…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 05:47 AM
9

Everywhere we go they say, damn redpills fuckin up the program. Then you realize we don't care
/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 04:10 AM
2

Remember that quip from Mel Brooks about tragedy being a cut on his finger; Comedy is you falling down a manhole and dying? Well there you go. This was feminists shoving MRAs down a manhole for laffs. Not so much a joke as an assasination It was like a political show trial or the drama 'The Crucible' augmented with a laugh track. The "I'm glad that's not me!" school of funny. Oddly enough I was t.hinkin about how Fox tried repeatedly to make a conservative humor new show to match Comedy Central'…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 03:22 AM
2

It must be good. Some group is downvoting every post on it.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/14 02:30 PM
2

Ask him to explain the significant number of women involved in men's rights advocacy. Then tell him that you don't have to be a man to get Men's Rights, but you do have to be an adult. He still has some growing up to do, evidently.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 04:16 AM
2

On that note, I have a 'daughter' who has an interest in microbrews. Her brothers bet her that girls can't make their own microbrews, so she want 50K to set up her own garage brewery. Who want to fund me- ah, I mean, my 'daughter'? $50 and below gets a picture of an empty beer bottle. $75 and below gets the bottle. Empty, of course. $100 gets a bottle and a picture of me passed out face down on the couch. (Testings hard, you know.) That bottle will be empty too. $200 and below donations gets you…
/r/MensRights07/03/14 05:05 PM
7

If a woman did poke holes in a condom just what crime would she be charged with? What sort of punishment could the state use to counter its current reward to women of having their very own male serf if impregnated?
/r/MensRights07/03/14 04:34 PM
15

They mastered this scam, so now onto bigger fish via federal set-asides for women owned businesses. Looking forward to hearing about the 'child prodigy' who's contracting business is 'fixing' the Obamacare website.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 03:01 AM
9

I was thinking of doing this. But since some of my ancestors are Irish, I'm going to emigrate to Bennegan's.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 02:42 AM
1

Huh. I thought this board preached that any woman was 'that type of woman' if you have enough game. Where do women 'types' fit in to this red pill theory?
/r/TheRedPill05/03/14 11:27 AM
0

If it helps, you can pronounce it Crêpe, and then follow it up with an european-style fingertip kiss.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 01:32 AM
7

Who's to say the guy who snitched out this private conversation wasn't the one to jumpstart it, then edited out how he derailed the original thread?
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 08:05 PM
7

Look at it this way: If you read an article that confuses redpills with MRMs then you know the author did not do their homework and they are idiots, dishonest or lazy.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 05:52 AM
11

I translate the article thusly: Dear MRA's. You were right, we were wrong. But our entire belief structure is built on the premise that we are intellectual, sensitive healers, and we were acting like, well, dull-witted, abusive douches. So we are going to continue to smear shit on you while acknowledging your correct points. Guess that makes us dishonest as well. Sorry. We'll bring this up at our next therapy session. Thanks for understanding!
/r/MensRights27/02/14 01:43 AM
13

Hey, look what I found with five seconds of searching on Google:m/f primate sizes Reporters do know how to use Google, don't they?
/r/MensRights26/02/14 04:27 AM
3

Today I leaned dissenting opinions need a trigger warning.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 12:34 AM
3

I reject your conventional, commercial concepts of art. I sharpied in mustaches and tattoos on all the models in Sports Illustrated's swimsuit issue. I made my children dress up as makerels and tuna fish for Halloween, then chased them about the neighborhood screaming "There is no cod". I suppose this makes me a surreal man.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 05:48 PM
3

Well, the rest of you 'men' can turn the streets over to the animals and liberals but not me. Slaps on Charles Bronson style mustache and whips out cartoonishly large handgun Not. Me.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 02:00 AM
2

"It's not easy being a SRS member. If it were easy, idiots would do it. Oh wait..."
/r/MensRights18/02/14 10:10 AM
7

Is there a repository of wikipedia articles the feminists successfully pushed down the memory hole?
/r/MensRights16/02/14 02:06 AM
8

You don't get karma on Reddit for being accurate, unique or even a good conversationalist. You get karma on Reddit by saying something a lot of people like, and reinforce what they 'know'.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/14 02:16 AM
2

I find this unbelievable. How can you not intend to kill someone whilst plunging a knife into their heart while they sleep? Either the jurors or this woman must have experienced a complete detachment from reality. Look, you weren't part of the jury. You didn't see the evidence they saw, which evidently muddled the argument the prosecution was making for murder, alright? Who are we to judge? Who among us hasn't noticed a thread sticking out of our - or a beloved's - sweater, and have plunged a st…
/r/MensRights13/02/14 04:04 PM
3

Would have been more accurate if feminist robot was a dalek in a wig. "Do not dispute with Feminist Dalek. Obey without question!" "Whoever is operating a penis is an enemy of Feminist Dalek. All enemies of Feminist Dalek are basement dwelling neckbeards who must be exterminated. EXTERMINATE!"
/r/MensRights07/02/14 05:15 AM
4

Getting child support is in the best interest of the child, but for some reason, verifying the money allocated is actually spent on the child isn't 'in the best interest of the child'.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/14 07:19 AM
2

BelieveHer = #yay4bigotry
/r/MensRights04/02/14 11:37 AM
4

Here's a counter proposal that should be offered: Let MRA's provide their own security for these speakers. It won't cost the university a penny, and even the poorest MRAs can contribute. I think even feminists would like it too, because it shows MRA's organizing and getting something accomplished outside of just talking. This is an opportunity to actually put this concern of theirs to rest, which I think they would truely appreciate.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 11:33 AM
3

No, what they should be doing is arresting the protesters and expelling them from the school. (the ones pulling the fire alarms and/or being violent... aka the ones making the security fee necessary). Since feminist clubs and organizers are directing the mayhem, why not just pull the funds from money earmarked for feminist organizations and faculty members? Anything else is an incentive for the rabble to make a bigger tantrum to rack up larger fees for their opponents.
/r/MensRights04/02/14 11:23 AM
5

The Evolution of Men's Rights online Ten years ago: "Men's Rights? What's that? Do you hate women?" Five years ago: "Men don't need rights. Why do you hate women?" Three years ago: "Men rule the world and all their concerns are addressed. When did you start hating women?" Yesterday: "Ok, Men suffer from real problems, but those problems can be addressed through feminism, so don't bother organizing, assembling, discussing or lobbying for change. Oh, and that feminist said you guys really hate wom…
/r/MensRights30/01/14 04:25 AM
4

There are plenty of horrors in this world to feel disgusted by. A group of people concened with the welfare, freedoms and rights of their fellow human beings isn't one of them.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 03:48 AM
4

There's way too much emotion wrapped up in the word 'abortion' to sell anything with it in the name. Trying to sell paternal surrender by calling it 'financial abortion' is like trying to sell Volkswagens by calling them "Hitlermobiles'.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 01:41 AM
28

Here's a question: Is there anyone on the internet who hasn't been threatened with rape and torture? Why has dealing with nasty, bullshitting blowhards now a woman's issue? The only time I have ever heard of a troll facing their victim is when the victim goes to the trouble of searching them down and initiating contact. Now when I have heard of people using the internet to physically stalk and harrass a person to the point they have killed themselves its usually women or girls doing it as part o…
/r/MensRights25/01/14 02:26 PM
14

If this keeps up I can see a future where oppressed men set sail from Florida in makeshift rafts and boats, daring to make the dangerous, 90 mile ocean journey south to Cuba - for freedom.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 01:46 PM
9

Feminists in the UN are working to make sure that child support payments are enforced wherever you go.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 01:43 PM
114

Lots of broken people out there with daddy issues. But I don't care. Being banned by satanists puts you on a whole new level of bad-assery. I never knew I was so dangerous. sips strawberry milk
/r/MensRights14/01/14 02:05 AM
3

"A real man doesn't let himself get manipulated by wrinkled old biddies."
/r/MensRights10/01/14 12:05 AM
3

Nuke it from orbit. That's the only way to be sure.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 11:56 PM
3

Do you have an example of feminists being as critical of females gaming males for freebies? The only women they seem to be critical of are those that want to be housewives. Where are the "Real women buy their own drinks" and "Real women pick up the tab" posters dotting college campuses alongside the "Real men don't rape" bulletins? Where are the sassy "I'll buy my own drink" chants at the slutwalks? If feminists are so concerned with women getting taken advantage of when intoxicated, perhaps the…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/14 10:57 AM
9

Do you feel like invading Poland? Whoa, whoa - slow down there speedy. - first we have to annex the Sudetenland.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 01:01 AM
2

lol, you idiots need to drop the "cultural marxism" shit talk. It makes you look extremely retarded. Whenever the phrase 'cultural marxism' comes up I can't help but think of Groucho in "Duck Soup"
/r/MensRights31/12/13 01:41 AM
1

While I've seen underwear with "Home of the Whopper" on them, I don't think you can find pants with "Meaty" - so you'll have to make them at home.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 06:33 PM
2

Well it is the other person's problem if, for example, one has decided to give up their career to raise a family as part of their agreement within the relationship. "I go to work, you stay at home" Here's a question - what if the stay-at-home doesn't contribute anything to the family? They have a maid and servants to take care of labor, and they can do whatever they want to with their time - and they choose to do nothing. Do they deserve alimony?
/r/MensRights29/12/13 06:29 PM
2

NOMAS Si, ciertamente no mas.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 05:52 PM
15

Also, just because the girls can wear sweatpants with "JUICY" printed on the backside doesn't mean guys can wear sweatpants with "MEATY" on the frontside.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 01:17 PM
19

So full of win. on July 23, 2008, a police operation saved a 13-year old child who was sodomized by a band of pedophiles. One of the arrested was the psychologist Jorge Corsi; a highly influential feminist ideologue, a member of a commission that defined the “gender violence” law, director of Specialization in Family Violence in the School of Psychology, author of 5 books and of a paper against the protection of children from parental alienation. He is now in jail with definitive sentence for ch…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 08:36 PM
12

I can't help but wonder how many "socal" "workers" hate Men's Rights because it is in their financial self-interest to hate it? Men's Rights has a problem with the draconian implementation of "child" support, and how it is often backed up with inprisonment. I can imagine that a good number of SRS posters are "social" "workers" that benifit from this system. I suspect they would hate to loose a cozy little government job that allows them to do little more than karma whore on Reddit all day on the…
/r/MensRights19/12/13 03:30 PM
1

I thought that honor went to the person who coined the word 'selfie'.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 03:54 AM
-2

But how could their shoplifting not be terrorism if violence is "the intentional use of physical force or power, threatened or actual, against oneself, another person, or against a group or community, which either results in or has a high likelihood of resulting in injury, death, psychological harm, maldevelopment, or deprivation". How can physically taking something away from someone against their will not be a form of violence? If this was politically motivated with the intent to 'send a messa…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 10:15 AM
3

Feminists, like the tolitarian regimes they emulate, often employ false memory implantation and mind control techniques. She probably knew some feminists that reframed the incident and brainwashed her.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/13 03:26 AM
3

I wonder what Grace Hopper's take on all this would be.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 10:49 AM
0

And even if it told you the truth, would you be able to use its advice? Shark: Swim about till you smell something wounded, hear something that sounds weak or see a prey item swimming poorly. Ambush it from its blind side. Flounder: Lie in the mud, when something good swims by, pop up and eat it. Deep sea angler fish: First, tie a fishing pole to your head....
/r/TheRedPill29/11/13 06:23 PM
38

“There’s a 5-year-old child here,” Mirabelli said. “Imagine how a child feels when your father says he feels emotionally damaged by your birth.” Imagine how a child feels finding out their mother is a dishonest skank.
/r/TheRedPill18/11/13 11:25 PM
11

Turn out he may have been blindfolded. Most newlyweds are. ZING!
/r/MensRights13/11/13 01:30 AM
11

I'm surprised nobody has touched on the themes of female sexual exploitation and misogyny in "Tempest" and "Pong". And have you seen that foul-mouthed Q*Berts nose? Obviously a reference to the "Red Pill"
/r/MensRights11/11/13 09:03 PM
1

Parker and Blacksad are both set in the 50's though. This kind of bothers me - aren't there any red-pill comics with a modern setting? Let me bounce a couple of titles off you and tell me what you think: "Daredevil" and "Hawkeye".
/r/TheRedPill11/11/13 08:49 PM
20

Very, very informative. I've always wondered why prison rape wasn't considered a form of rape culture. I never suspected the term was hijacked by Feminists. My only question now is, what term should we use to describe Feminism's culture of theft, inaccuracy and slander?
/r/MensRights08/11/13 02:30 AM
2

Read Parker. Not sure I would say he's honorable - just a very professional criiminal whose concerned with his rep. But that's my reading. Check out a series called Blacksad. Spanish comic made for French market. A bit more cartoony compared to Parker, but the style helps with the characterization.
/r/TheRedPill06/11/13 11:30 PM
3

I was thinking along similar lines. Their house wasn't crazy, offesive or scary. What was the point? Next time someone should suggest "Haunted Family Court". I'm just throwin that in as a freebie....
/r/MensRights31/10/13 11:25 AM
22

Thanks, but you know, someone's gotta get the message out about this issue. So me and some like-minded individuals are going to go ghost ride on our car hoods while holding signs saying "Stop shaming me" and "Don't tell me how to drive, tell cars not to crash".
/r/MensRights30/10/13 03:53 AM
89

Blaming the driver would mean normalizing and condoning wreck culture.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 01:33 AM
5

Doesn't it bother you a little bit that those 'hussies' take your trollings and bang out articles about them which allow them to get paid? The crazier the shit you trigger them with, the more money they make, and the more legitimate they appear from what I can see.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 07:56 PM
3

I'm trying to show you that the situation for women need specific rulings. ...because the best solution to inequality and injustice is more inequality and injustice. Right?
/r/MensRights27/10/13 07:28 PM
1

These women don't exist. Isn't that kind of impossible to prove?
/r/TheRedPill23/10/13 11:30 AM
1

should I lie about sleeping around in future? Offer her a deal: "Ask me no questions, I'll tell you no lies."
/r/TheRedPill23/10/13 12:41 AM
-1

Before you couldn't fight this kind of behavior if it is 'in the DNA'. Now we can - if we have the courage to. Or we can say 'nuttin we can do' and continue to let women who cheat have an avantage over women who have grace, skill and integrity. Its a kind of heady science-fictiony thought experiment. If this kind of behavior was repressed, what kind of path would this drive humanity down?
/r/TheRedPill21/10/13 01:35 AM
3

Mighty fine detective work there, Chief Wiggum - ah I mean Chief Powers
/r/TheRedPill16/10/13 07:22 PM
4

Patriarchy is to Feminists as "Zionist Occupied Government" is to antisemites.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 10:25 PM
2

Written by those mythical 'straw feminists' no doubt. Grab some popcorn and watch feminists contort and flip-flop like little circus clowns trying to explain how it isn't hate - just 'irony' or 'blowing off steam'.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 01:10 AM
20

I've always wondered - do feminists when they are at a restaurant go out of the way to pay the waitresses 27% more and the waiters 27% less? Shouldn't they be doing this if the 77% fact is true? As for the beta-knights, ask them how many times a woman has paid for their meals. ( And mom's don't count. )
/r/TheRedPill03/09/13 12:26 AM
3

They would certainly get rid of the commands that sound a bit rapey, such as mount, ram, touch, and many others. I would imagine you could still access the commands but only through their feminist-approved sudo replacement, 'triggerword'. And you could never, ever force a file system check on your system.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 03:41 PM
1

Your post was fine. I'm not sure what Makh got the idea that it or posts like it fell under the category of "woman bashing". How odd. Still, even a blind pig can find a nut. Getting a lawyer sounds right - and is the typical advice given here.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 11:59 AM
39

You head right over to /r/feminism and all the associated subs claiming that drunk sex is rape and you engage them. Closes eyes and imagines wading into a pool filled with sharks armed only with a fist full of hamburger Yes. Go to /r/feminism. That will work out well.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 11:52 AM
3

At least until its used as the pretext to arrest a pair of attractive lesbians sipping wine. Or shut down a bars or clubs giving discounted drinks or freebies just to women. Ladies night discounts? That's just rife with rape culture I tell you.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 11:42 AM
7

Sorry, I disagree. Bad, unjust laws get changed faster when the beautiful people get ground up in the gears like the rest of us as opposed to making special exceptions for them. That was what the petition you signed was about right? Changing the law vs a pretty cheerleader exception?
/r/MensRights16/08/13 01:16 PM
13

Nice try Lex Luthor.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 02:30 PM
6

I am black and have no idea where these men derive their authority over the black community. Once you have the honorific "Reverend" or "Rev" you automatically get recognition as a black leader. That's just how it is.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 08:08 PM
4

Right. Next you'll be telling us Bono isn't the leader of Ireland.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 07:57 PM
-1

Can you believe they have classes on it? Well, if ebonics isn't your cup of tea, you can go to England and take classes in Cockney. The effort to preserve local dialects and patois isn't uncommon.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/13 03:48 AM
1

You know, the only fable Disney hasn't ripped off is the Magic Fish story. I wonder why....
/r/TheRedPill16/07/13 02:26 AM
9

I find their fixation on us... creepy.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 09:44 AM
8

Oh, it's not as if I don't know that their torture-wish will never come true for a litany of reasons, including the constitutional one. It's more that I was disturbed at how gleefully they want this. Some people never develop an an adult sense of empathy. There's a big difference between justice and pre-adolescent torture fantasies. Torture is all about beating the crap out of someone till they give you what they want. You were using logic. She was attempting to browbeat you into agreeing with h…
/r/MensRights07/07/13 12:53 PM
3

Its a false dichotomy - she is deliberatly leaving out the option of adoption. Do women have the right to release themselves in such a way from the responsibility for a child? Yes they do. Does the father have that right? Apparently not. Why is that?
/r/TheRedPill07/07/13 02:34 AM
1

Sorry, should have been a bit more specific on who I was referring to. "They" being the prospecitve employer and rumormongers. Not "they" as in "bribe the cops". There are some places where you would have to bribe the police to do their jobs, so I can understand the confusion.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 04:58 AM
-8

What? Seriously? Tell them you haven't been arrested nor prosecuted for rape. You don't have a record and its their burden to prove it, not yours. Try this. Tell them that the rapist label is a lie, and you are willing to pay them $200 for the name of the person who libelled you in a signed affidavit. If they go through, you'll make your money back in a defamation suit. If they won't, well, why not?
/r/MensRights23/06/13 12:13 AM
-2

I think its a great idea - as long as the Feminists in the EU Parliament are manning the fleets... leading from the front so to speak. And the fleets are working the Bering Straits... I hear there's lots of fish in the Cook Straits as well.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 11:54 PM
1

...because she's the hero the radfems deserve, but not the one they need right now.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 12:32 AM
1

I guess human trafficing and slavery is A-OK as long as its 'for the children' - and saves the government money of course.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 03:12 AM
7

You aren't allowed to steal stuff which you give to your kids and beg the law to "think about the children." Nor are you allowed to help yourself to other people's stuff and divy it among your friends and claim "the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few". This wasn't a matter of someone stealing bread because they were hungry. It was a scam artist that wanted a more comfortable life at someone else's expense.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 02:50 AM
1

As long as you are thoughtfully, honestly questioning yourself, then no. You are not a fanatic. Now your friend on the other hand...
/r/MensRights13/06/13 01:12 AM
5

Really. The best response to a bad discussion board is to leave it I would think. Most boards have a finite lifespan and there is no constraint or limitation to their creation. The faster they attempt to drive people out and attempt to control dialog, the faster their "turf" implodes on itself.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 12:07 AM
2

Great article. Bookmarking it for the "Facts of Life" lecture to give children.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 11:56 PM
6

She was being provocative and aggressive. It wasn't an accident, it wasn't negligence. It was deliberate, it was assault. Perhaps a wrecked face will teach her to walk away rather than escalate.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 09:43 PM
6

So, what's to stop any deadbeat father from using that as an excuse? "She just hired me to give her sperm yer honour!" It's unprovable either way. Actually, its very provable. If she is married then it is their child since it was a product of their union.. If she isn't married since it was her body and her decision to spend nine months of her life making a baby then it is her baby - unless she made some sort of written contract with the father to support the baby. He doesn't have the right to fo…
/r/MensRights11/06/13 09:32 PM
9

The creepshots reddit was about 'wierdos using a camera to shame sluts' on reddit, while this is more about 'werdos using a camera to shame sluts' on facebook. There might be some other privilege at work here, but I'll leave that deduction as an exercise to the reader. Another point - since she snapped his face, and it costs him in some form, who is responsible for the damage done? Ms.Creepshooter or Facebook?
/r/MensRights09/06/13 06:07 PM
6

Where fathers are not being held accountable is in the rulings around a newly announced Chinese laws. Mothers who give birth out of wedlock will be fined, there is no mention of fathers being punished. So fathers aren't being held accountable. So an unmarried man is responsible for keeping track of the location and health of a woman he had sex with for nine months. Say that out loud and ask yourself - does this sound kinda crazy? Because it sounds kinda crazy to me.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 10:15 PM
3

How is he so full of it? I guess its kind of easy when you get all your information from one opinion piece: SPL Intelligence Report 2012 Spring 145
/r/MensRights02/06/13 11:13 AM
8

Advertise it as a "Safe Space - Feminist-Free Zone" and ban feminists with the explanation of how they promote sexism and shut down debate.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 06:22 PM
5

Wait. How can one 'raid' a subreddit? Does she mean that MRA's not supposed to converse outside of our little ghetto?
/r/MensRights26/05/13 02:40 PM
7

This. If she has a "Coming Out" party should the cake say "I'm Gay!" or "I'm an Idiot!"
/r/MensRights25/05/13 11:35 AM
5

If there is one thing I have learned after following the Orson Scott Card dramas and Crichton's Global Warming tantrums, its to take a pass on editorials and social commentary penned by sci-fi writers, thank you.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 02:13 PM
2

I can only assume this must be some crazy scheme to jump-start a male dominated underground economy in Sweeden. Because that is what they are going to get.
/r/MensRights16/05/13 01:25 AM
3

Your best bet would be to find a doctor to convince them there are no medical benefits - being male wouldn't hurt, but the younger the better. But the medical excuse is just their justification for 'tradition' or 'copying the neighbors'. Tell them that circumcision was a procedure that was used to control slaves in the past. Do they want their son to be like a slave, or like a leader?
/r/MensRights15/05/13 10:45 AM
9

In fact its an exellent test of his 'best friend's character. How does she react when presented with a pre-nup? Is she still his best friend when he declines to marry her without one? As a side note, I think this meme needs to be pushed more vigorously. I want to see "REAL LOVE is a PRE-NUP" posters up in High Schools and Colleges along side the "REAL MEN DON"T RAPE" bulletins.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 10:34 AM
1

Slavery acts as a wealth concentrator. A wealthy person can hire a slave and easily underbid a job that a free man could use to support a family. You saw that happen in the Roman Empire. You also saw it happen here in the US in border states - Fredrick Douglass was beaten half to death as a slave when he showed up to work a job in Baltimore for that very same reason. It was cheaper to injure him and send a message than to compete against slave labor. The poor that didn't have slaves were more or…
/r/MensRights14/05/13 11:11 PM
3

I heard the same thing from a female MP. MPs have to deal with a good uptick in false rape reports. She said sometimes its pretty obvious what the deal is, other times less so.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 09:18 PM
1

but he MADE it No he didn't. Think about it. Not that this is the crux of your argument. Lets quit beating around the bush and get to the root of your argument - that you don't think women are capable or responsible enough to make these decisions on their own and you feel the state needs to seek out a man to take responsibility for her actions and body.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 07:36 PM
3

If I was a male student at this school who minded my own business and never shamed anyone I would take down every poster put up because they defamed my character. I'd then tell them to appologise or I would find a way to have them punished for defamation and harassment.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 11:29 AM
10

Onion implements an 'affirmative action' program to combat discrimination against unfunny jokes. "People were complaining that our paper was biased against unfunny humor - knock-knock jokes, dead baby jokes - that kind of thing. So to show we weren't discriminating against the lame, the unoriginal, the banal, we decided to give equal time to shit that really isn't funny. Once we started letting it be known that we were removing the glass ceiling keeping retarded comedy out of print we got all so…
/r/MensRights09/05/13 02:09 AM
24

So? Boys have gotten stiffer penalties for pretending poptarts and chicken fingers are guns.
/r/MensRights09/05/13 01:13 AM
7

Sir, are you aware of the many benefits from fifth and fourth digit removal? Studies have shown that it dramatically reduces the number of hang nails suffered over a lifetime, reduces the chances of finger cancers and lessens the chance of accidently slamming said digits in drawers and doors. There are many financial gains as well. Gloves are cheaper and require less material, nail polish application time is greatly reduced and manicures become faster and cheaper.
/r/MensRights08/05/13 03:05 AM
1

True. Nothing to see here except a millionare teaching their kids two important lessons - 1. Spend other people's money as often as possible. 2. You can manipulate the masses with a good story or hook.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 08:18 PM
1

Vice - kid tested, mother approved.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 02:49 PM
4

What's an affirmative action bake sale, and what does it have to do with Men's Rights?
/r/MensRights13/04/13 10:13 PM
19

Seeing how much stress and damage pro football puts on men's bodies, they should allow him to keep it for future medical expenses he will have to pay. Athletes should have their lawyers calculate out how much of their income came at the cost of future health and deduct that. Or at least allow claw-backs.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 04:14 AM
91

"Well, since you work five times as hard, you should have little difficulty putting more effort into being considerate. Please take the poster down."
/r/MensRights09/04/13 10:48 PM
13

But imagine the possibilities if you were her roommate.... You're all "You want the last piece of cake in the fridge?" And she says "Yes". A few moments later she's all "I thought I said I wanted that piece of cake!" and you, brushing cake crumbs off your face explain "for you, sometimes yes doesn't mean yes".
/r/MensRights28/03/13 12:44 AM
1

I'm curious to see if this Kickstarter makes more than Brian Banks kickstarter. And if so, why?
/r/MensRights25/03/13 12:01 PM
0

Good. Even better - a tshirt that says "Dongles= 1; Prudish Tattletales= 0"
/r/MensRights24/03/13 02:13 AM
18

She does have a dongle to pick with you guys, however. Fixed that for you.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 08:55 PM
2

THIS WEEK. Its like April the first came early.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 08:52 PM
14

Final line from her blog: "Yesterday the future of programming was on the line and I made myself heard." So brave. Perhaps Ms Richards brave example will embolden Anne Frank's snitch to step out of the shadows as well; "The future of the Third Reich was on the line and I made myself heard!"
/r/MensRights20/03/13 01:12 AM
3

Its amazing how many of these authors write about Men's rights without actually talking to or interviewing Men's Rights supporters.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 01:06 AM
7

I figured he was guilty of such actions, but had to project his guilt out onto other men for an 'appology'. In other words, typical white knight behavior.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 11:03 PM
1

Well, at least she splits the injuries and increased wear and tear on the body. I'd like to think future medical expenses are discounted in these settlements since a lot of pro athletes wreck their bodies to make those fantastic sums.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 03:14 AM
5

I see nothing wrong with asking men to make a promise that enables them to be better people. But I can't help but notice that men are always being challenged with these oaths. Why aren't women challenged - or challenging each other? Perhaps someone should go to the Feminism board and call on 'one million feminists' to promise to support Men's Rights? It would be a good thing.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 07:04 PM
0

Punishment as a whole is utterly useless. Must be good for something. People love voting in politicians that claim they are 'tough on criminals and prisoners".
/r/MensRights09/03/13 01:06 PM
5

So who's going to break the news to them that the world's richest woman made her money by "thrusting mine shafts into the body of mother earth"?
/r/MensRights06/03/13 11:27 PM
5

Two bad examples. One of the initiating conditions of the Rodney King riots was a Korean shop owner who shot a girl in the back because she mistakenly thought the girl was stealing a carton of orange juice. And while stories about 'rioting blacks' were proven to be false, reports of vigilantes stalking flood victims and children haven't.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 12:45 AM
3

If any situation needs a "Snappy Answers to Stupid Questions" its this one. Sigh. Fine. I'll start it off. SQ: Why are you in this playground? SA: I was going to ask you the same thing - this isn't a dog park, you know.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 02:49 AM
0

Personally, I like to role model myself against people who seek out their triggers rather than avoid them.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:03 PM
10

Somewhere in the world a woman is upset! What are you as lazy men doing to fix this? cracks open a beer On it.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 01:36 AM
1

The article is a gordian knot of stupidity. The best response is not to respond. Just post articles about MRA issues to DK in terms of equality and fairness. If the feminists and their political eunichs want to argue against equality and fairness on DK, let them. It will drive more people into our camp.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 12:18 PM
1

Easy. They call themselves 'editorialists' or "opinion writers', spread their cheeks then let the bullshit flow free. People buy it because they are too lazy to put effort into factchecking and just believe what they read.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 12:09 PM
1

To borrow a bit from Mary McCarthy, I'd say every word in that article is a lie, including 'and' and 'the'.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 12:03 PM
5

Amazing how many people dismissed that guy as merely a 'sperm donor' because the mother doesn't need his assistance. Of course, if she were demanding support, there would be lots of calls for "daddy-deadbeat" to 'man-up' and start cutting checks. "The baby has a right to that money!" bla bla bla.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 12:22 AM
2

Once 95% of the battle is won, most of the people who brought the bulk of the movement say 'good enough' and move on. The people that are left behind are usually the people who were politically positioned, the lazy and the hardcore you-owe-me-ers who aren't satisfied with anything less than their opponents grovelling.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 10:56 PM
2

Why? If you have some personal, first hand accounts of dealing with gang members by all means share them.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 04:25 PM
0

Kickstart this.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 04:20 PM
2

I can't stay loyal to you or uphold my contracts or respect you, but I expect you to uphold agreements under that contract by continuing to cut me checks. Impartial? Really?
/r/MensRights03/02/13 03:58 PM
3

Well, if that's the case.... Did you know that domestic violence against men actually increases during the Superbowl? Seems that angry football widows get tired of competing with the television for attention and use physical and emotional abuse to make sure they receive the attention they deserve. "True" story. And if not - well, remember men are often targets of domestic violence!!!
/r/MensRights02/02/13 01:07 PM
4

Wait - are you talking about the Slate article, Hanna Rosin's book or her creepy, fawning reddit syncophants?
/r/MensRights30/01/13 11:55 AM
7

What happened to the woman was certainly unfair Was it? The story title is somewhat deceptive. The relationship was 30 years old. The business was purchased in 2007 for 750K pounds. If she kicked some of that money in, she's entitled to a share of the business - or at least her money back. Otherwise it was his money and finances at stake. If shit went south, she wouldn't have been on the hook. So I'm having trouble seeing what's she is entitled to - outside of maybe five years worth of back pay …
/r/MensRights24/01/13 06:46 PM
1

And I don't see any posters up telling girls to "Give nice guys a chance" and "Stop hanging around violent men." Well, maybe someone should. It would allow the gals to be more 'proactive' and 'empowered'.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 03:53 PM
1

You could always do a kick-starter that says its raising funds to find out what happened to the money. A lot of con-artists pull this to double-dip the marks, but you could do a legitimate investigation.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 03:32 PM
-2

At least until she burns through the money and decides to hit up the suckers again. That's how con-artists work - take advantage of the egos, pride and dupability of their targets. Once they have identified a good pool of marks, hit them again, and again, and again until that rich vein is mined out of cash or stupidity.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 03:28 PM
15

Dude, that was a lawsuit that could have paid for your college education.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 07:57 PM
1

That's the new "whiteknight" Conan defending a feminist from the evil 'penis-headed' spirit of patriarchy. "You defeated that MRA and saved the slut-walk" she said to the friend-zoned sword-swinger, "but did you realize I only earn sixty-five cents on the dollar for doing the equivalent work?"
/r/MensRights18/01/13 12:31 PM
13

Cause you see, using sex to sell romance fiction to women is okay - but using it to sell to men is wrong, wrong, WRONG apparently. Looking forward to seeing Larry the Cable Guy on the front cover of Cosmopolitan's "Stop Creepshaming" issue. Hope that line of 'relationship' novels showing women in the arms of homeless crackheads works out Harlequin. But of course, if someone reprinted Nancy Drew covers with Nancy wearing a spandex thong and a cat suit feminists would flip their collective wigs. I…
/r/MensRights18/01/13 11:33 AM
5

I had to laugh at their justification: We want to use the FCC as a bully pit to influence all media. Couldn't have picked a worst reason that is completely outside of the purpose of the FCC, but it makes sense to them in their delusion. I might have entertained the idea if they had proposed a woman with an engineering, science or math background, but their argument wasn't based on having a great candidate - just the usual appeals to emotion.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 04:51 PM
15

Except that's not what he actually said though, is it? He said despite the truth he's willing to still be their father. They are the ones who are actually acting upon the information as if he isn't their papa. Its only common sense who should they be angrier with. They are blaming their father because its easier vs wrecking the connection with their mother. And lets be frank - she wasn't much of a mother or a wife if she was disappering for days at a time from her family for sex vacations. Seems…
/r/MensRights13/01/13 04:11 PM
11

The judge stated that while it wasn't fair to me, and it was out of the ordinary and could understand why I would be frustrating, he could not with good concience put a mother out on the street. Ah.. his concience, your cash. Are there any other charities or causes that he supports that you could pay for too? I gotta wonder - how would one suggest to a judge that perhaps he could pay for deadbeat mom's upkeep since it was troubling him. Since she was a professional housekeep he could even let he…
/r/MensRights11/01/13 12:07 PM
13

Nine years old is a bit young to discover your mom is off her rocker.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 03:45 PM
3

I would have told her some of the funniest people I know are feminists. Maybe they should go pro with their screechy, man-shamin, "I hate nice guys" material rather than waste their 'Sam Kineson with a boob-job' bits on posts and blogs.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 06:11 PM
4

1 Put up or shut up time. Pull out a tape recorder and tell them to state on it that they believe you are a rapist and have been spreading that idea as fact. 2 If they are stupid enough to do so, sue them for defamation/libel. 3 Tell them you will settle out of court for a small amount if they tell you who told them. Locate loudmouths. Ask them - "Did you really say this?" Repeat
/r/MensRights04/01/13 06:03 PM
1

Maybe they just aren't organizing enough slutmarches overseas to tell the local men that rape is wrong?
/r/MensRights01/01/13 03:54 PM
1

Hmm. From what I saw in a number of the churches I went to in my youth, the pastor is probably responsible for more than one of those single mothers.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 03:52 PM
1

And President Obama never forgot and went down in history as America's first MRA president. As chief executive of the United States he took the lead in examining and rolling back misandrinistic legislation, fixing the family court system and getting the government out of the wealth redistribution business. : (
/r/MensRights26/12/12 10:33 PM
2

Oh my gosh, it was. I hope no one else goes through it. Would you believe that somebody made a comedy movie about the situation?
/r/MensRights26/12/12 10:18 PM
1

It's called the mean. Its obtained by combining all the IQs and dividing it by number of people. No. I'm talking about someone who in a social setting manages to slam the collective intelligence of a group way, way below the mean. They can be more than competent on their own, but in a group they bring the fail bigtime.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 07:30 PM
4

While an individual can't have negative intelligence, I belive that there are some poeple who's participation in group or organization can actually lower the overall IQ of that body. For proof look no further than the srieking goon squad that confronted Warren Farrell's audience at U.Toronto. Students and scholars ( in theory ) on their own, a troop of shaved slutmarching baboons en masse.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 10:30 PM
5

"Crom laughs at your triggers, and sneers at your warnings. Come, let me give you a few more traumas and triggers fool."
/r/MensRights22/12/12 02:05 PM
7

No problem. Hope for his sake she didn't bring bed bugs. Nasty, nasty critters. I would think he would be almost forced to throw her stuff out and fumigate if he did find them, you know?
/r/MensRights21/12/12 04:06 PM
23

True, but he's going to pay a pound of flesh regardless. This just speeds things along and minimizes the risk to his stuff, dwelling and sanity. Now, if he wanted to make a game of it, remove all the food from the house, have the water cut off. Get a knapsack full of cliff bars, a couple of quart water bottles, a friend and some video games and camp the skank out. Three days max without water and she's gone.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 04:03 PM
132

There's an old joke about how you don't pay prostitutes for sex - you pay them to leave after sex. She's a druggie and a con-artist. He should bribe her with cash if he's honest, a cancelled check or cancelled credit card if he isn't.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 01:29 PM
2

Obviously we need stricter government control of gas ranges. A gun at worst shoots a bullet that can affect one person. A gas range in the hands of a dysfunctional individual can destroy a whole room or building filled with people. Where's my elected representative?
/r/MensRights20/12/12 10:20 PM
1

If cooks can put jalapeno peppers in cornbread muffins, why not horseradish on cupcakes? Wasabi cupcakes. Yes.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 02:15 PM
1

Rather than gender neutral Hasbro should work a deal with "Food Network" to market a "Guy Fieri's Flavor Country EZ Bake oven". Hasbro could make a Sweet Genius EZ Bake oven competition game. You know, "Make a unicorn themed cupcake with those Orange Circus peanuts. BEEP BEEP BEEP Now add the secret ingredient: Horseradish"
/r/MensRights19/12/12 12:29 AM
1

The removed comment. It was fairly inflammatory.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 05:13 PM
0

Kind of makes sense in a fashion - he idolizes the underdog regardless of whatever warts said underdog has. The guy is a master storyteller, and a well told good-vs-evil fable sells better than a sophisticated documentary. Still, I got to wonder. How would the Men's Rights movement be portrayed if Michael Moore did a documentary on us? Would he use his usual themes of economics, uncertainty and fear to describe us? Would he see us as underdogs, dupes of the patriarchy or something else entirely?
/r/MensRights16/12/12 05:09 PM
1

Ha! I have a confession. I'm the grammar white knight. I saw all those strkethroughs on that virgin paragraph fragment and just lost it. Gosh darn it, I'm a nice guy, but those sentences always seem to prefer the dudes that bold up their i's and shake them up with italics. Well, not while I'm around they won't!!!
/r/MensRights15/12/12 06:49 AM
2

The guy who argued "Any man who hits a woman is scum and should go die" didn't seem that bright - just going with a crude, outdated rule of thumb that seems oblivious to circumstance or context. And then when someone points out the flaws of his opinions he gets angry and nasty. It was a simplification that was hammered into his skull that he figured was a safe answer that made him look good. That's what was important to him ( and other white knights in my opinion ) - 'looking good'. I think a tr…
/r/MensRights15/12/12 05:40 AM
2

Sorry if I didn't make it clear - I was commenting about the original flamer in the captured exchange - not recovering_PMO.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 04:54 AM
-18

Not the sharpest knife in the drawer. Typical white knight.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 08:15 AM
2

Well timed troll, well selected trigger words designed to inflame passions. But a bit over the top to the point where emotional manipulation is obvious. Final grade: B-
/r/MensRights13/12/12 02:55 PM
1

How much would it cost to have one of mediums on a "Crossing over" / "seance" TV programs put a bit in for these sorts of situations? You know, the medium can be rattling on about Dear Old Anut Betty when he suddenly stops, looks into the camera and screams about how "your selfish, stupid lie destroyed me" and "how cold it is here" and how she'd better clear my name because "I've been waiting for you and preparing for you if you don't." ...and then flips back to how Betty's Peach Cobbler's kille…
/r/MensRights12/12/12 08:00 PM
8

Isn't that why Rome fell? Because they couldn't keep their roadways and aquaducts repaired? You don't suppose they had imperial feminsts demanding that pedicures and aromatherapy be seen as 'infrastructure improvements' too, do you?
/r/MensRights10/12/12 01:53 PM
27

Squeeal! The 2013 uniforms just arrived. Love the skull and crossbones on the codpieces!!!
/r/MensRights10/12/12 01:33 PM
2

Would your wife's lawyer take payment of her legal bills in web development services? You could even cut them a discount since they think so highly of your skills.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 03:48 PM
0

Why couldn't the judge have hauled all the women of Wisconsin in front of the bench and ordered them not to have sex with idiots, concieve and birth said idiots kids then demand support from the state when daddy idiot says "aint got no job."? Oh, that's right. The judge would be slutmarched for blaming the victims.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 07:30 PM
56

Well, his mathematics and economics skills aren't so hot, but I bet he can walk the shit out of some high heels in a "Mile in her Shoes" march.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 06:00 PM
21

Feminists: "Women are having trouble running businesses because of nepotism and the old-boy network. Equality!" MRAs: "Well how about we increase good procurement practices, enforce fairness of the bidding processes, penalize cheats and work to get rid of back-room deals and corruption?" Old-Boy in falsetto: "Or we can throw a few token bones to women only businesses and have women-only set asides handed out by the fat-cats!" Feminist: "Works for me! Equality!" MRA: "WTF?" Feminist: shakes head …
/r/MensRights30/11/12 07:22 PM
3

t doesn't say that in the article. It says Aubry claims Martinez threatened him before they fought. It never says who struck first. It also says they both hit each other. I think you are seeing what you want to in this. It just sounds like two people acting trashy on a holiday and possibly in front of a child. All very good points. But remember, women using third parties to ambush dads during child exchanges happens quite a bit. Also, Aubry has more to lose in a physical fight during a child exc…
/r/MensRights29/11/12 02:01 PM
28

The majority of the posters on SRS would fail the turing test. Just take some old 'eliza' code and hack it so that every question it asks ends with "Do you hate women?", "Bigot!", "Rapist!" or "MRA asshole." and you have a SRS bot ready to rumble and karmawhore with the best of them..
/r/MensRights28/11/12 04:32 PM
2

What is the crime exactly? I didn't think making a false claim was actually illegal in itself. Well, just for the sake of experiment, go to the University of Cincinnati and file a false rape claim. When they ask where tell them the Chancellor's office or cashier's office. I'm sure after things settle down we'll all have a good laugh about this.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 04:15 PM
49

All we need to agree on is that men are wrong, bad, rapists, and ruin shit for everyone. Am I doing it right? Only if you write for jezebel.com.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 02:37 PM
3

You know, there should be a law: Anyone caught making up statistics to bolster a point must balance a stack of pancakes on their head for a period no less than one week.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 06:57 PM
2

I was hoping for a "White Feather" men's day logo, but the classic will do too I suppose.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 01:33 PM
6

Haters gonna hate
/r/MensRights20/11/12 02:25 AM
8

Watching several hours of "Basketball Wives", "Real Housewives of Atlanta", "Dr. Oz" and "Access Hollywood" without taking a shotgun to the widescreen? MOST DIFFICULT JOB ON THE PLANET.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 10:31 PM
1

Seriously, were you even at our last patriarchy meeting? I was so busy swimming laps in my money vault that I forgot all about it.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 11:18 AM
2

I'd like to think he and Paul Reubens could get together and restart Pee-Wee's Playhouse. Elmo and his bits from "Elmo's World" would fit right in.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 05:45 PM
11

If she was a democrat she would have run him down in a Volt.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 02:49 AM
2

Time to break out the popped collars and speedos for the "Stud March".
/r/MensRights12/11/12 10:52 AM
14

Awww... your very first strawman falacy. You must be * so * proud! Be sure to decorate it with extra stickers and glitter when you paste it in your scrapbook, kay?
/r/MensRights10/11/12 06:57 PM
24

The product of a studies program speaks for itself. The end product is supposed to be educated thoughtful scholars. In reality for every free thinking femist scholar like Camile Paglia we get a thousand dull-witted mendicants skilled only in vomiting out misandry on command. Those of the lot that aren't trust-fund babies usually end up going into government as 'social service' bureaucrats or law to 'spread the gospel'. Final result - more misandrinistic laws and an increased emphasis on wealth t…
/r/MensRights09/11/12 05:46 PM
9

Part of me wants to go "Boo" because creepy people have managed to take something benevolent like charity and weaponize it to their own ends. Part of me wants to go "Yay" because if you think about it, spending ten bucks to find out someone is a sociopath is pretty darn cheap.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 04:08 PM
1

Well that ninja king eight panels from the back did have that 'wtf was I thinking letting her into my life' look. It would have been a nice touch having him leap out with the hero both wearing a 'fuck this shit - lets go adventure' look on their faces.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 12:56 PM
5

Its probably nothing you nor any other student at GT has done. Someone has managed to sell this lecture circut to the administration with some line of PC bullshit about it making the campus safer, and now they are trying to sell you and all the other students into attending with the usual tired "man-up"/"real men"/"be a man" manipulative shit that they use to sell wars and body sprays. Don't be surprised if they also work in a "Man up! Spend 3 months salary on engagement rings" pitch between man…
/r/MensRights08/11/12 06:23 PM
1

Is it possible to sue the people who enabled her attack on you through the legal system? Attorneys or feminist social workers that provided her with tactics and strategies she could use to legally assault you?
/r/MensRights08/11/12 10:34 AM
1

You tell the bus driver to ask the other passengers if they saw you talk to the girls or bother them in anyway. Its a bus - people would easily notice that sort of thing. When nobody comes forward, you tell him that these girls are harrassing you and to throw them off the bus. If he doesn't you get his name and number and file a complaint with the transit authority he works for.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 02:20 PM
1

Trial by ordeal or trial by combat. Choices, choices...
/r/MensRights06/11/12 02:01 PM
2

Geez people, do I have to spell it out for you? Just get on craigslist and put out an ad for "clown to make condom balloon animals and watch couple have sex while hammered".
/r/MensRights05/11/12 01:55 AM
2

What the BBC should have done is borrow a page from the music industry and have the fashon blogger on the show lipsyncing the economist. This way everyone wins - the shallow people that stay for the pretty face, and the thoughtful people who get to hear an intelligent opinion.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 12:35 PM
11

My cynical voice says that it was the going above and beyond by paying half that did him in. It proved he could handle the increase, and since the state gets matching from the government, they wanted to make sure that those extra payments were recognized ( and matched ) by the system.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 05:25 PM
2

Ah, she'll get out once she uses the "but Cosmo said that it would turn him on" defense.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 12:50 PM
138

Be strong bro. A package marked "male privilege" should be arriving in the mail any day now.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 12:47 PM
24

"Me and a friend were going back to the dorm when these two creeps started lurking ahead of us... we tried to take another route home but they were there too... just a few feet in front of us. We tried to speed up to pass them, but they kept pace with us! We were soooo scared!!!
/r/MensRights21/10/12 07:11 PM
4

Shaw is a construction company based in Louisiana. HR isn't out on the site to tell the crew's self-elected asshole that sodomizing the newbies with a grease gun isn't a good idea.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 10:18 PM
1

Sounds like a personal problem.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 11:04 AM
10

ooooh... I thought it was the Speech Repression Squad.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 04:33 PM
17

Here is where the power of the internet kicks in. Google up information on the suit from a non-biased source. Turns out that the firefighters in question were discriminating against blacks and latinos with a rigged test, but letting family and friends slide through. The exams were salted with questions that had less to do with firefighting and were more about filtering out people who weren't prepped with the right answers beforehand - the equivalent of the 'reading exams' with grandfather clause…
/r/MensRights07/10/12 03:49 PM
5

You are not alone.
/r/MensRights06/10/12 02:43 PM
1

Galloway is sort of the left's equivalent of Batman, bless him. I can't wait to see what sort of sharp verbal bat-a-rangs he starts lobbing at the feminists in the NUS.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 03:16 PM
2

It makes me wonder if there is a guy's equivalent of Cosmo - one that recommends you take off all your clothes on the first date and leave a bazillion messages on her phone.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 01:40 PM
3

I hope most of us here are mature enough adults to handle our emotional reactions to things we might not like. [Trigger Warning: Sarcasm] I'm glad that a trigger warning against Lifetime Network dramas is optional for you. But for some of us being exposed to stilted dialog and wooden acting can be a life threatening event. Even now just thinking about the puerile, clumsy plots of their feminist morality plays is making my throat tighten and skin hive.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 02:09 AM
55

Then ask 'can I have a receipt - cause that's the only donation you're getting from me'.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 12:37 AM
2

Everyone is an enviornmentalist - its just a matter of how much of your environment you want to take responsibility for and what you are getting in return for degrading it. The same duck hunter that might fight to keep a local marsh from being drained may also dump used motor oil in the street. A guy who fights to keep african farmers from killing elephants might object to a wind farm ruining his panorama.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 04:14 PM
4

The author is shaming the slutwalkers for not having the politically correct stance wrt Assange. As far as they are concerned he is a man who had sex and therefore he is guilty of rape. Anyone who defends him is a rape appologist.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 04:40 PM
11

Anyway, I'm locking my door tonight because I'm a bit worried about SRS TEAM 6. Usually you can sneak out the back while they are looking for a place to park their short, yellow school bus.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 05:30 AM
4

Good ideas can come from anywhere - even sloppy thinkers who use 'socialism' as a pejorative. If it helps just swap in the word 'capitalism' where 'socialism' is used. It won't affect the points the author makes anyway.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 05:02 AM
2

(evil laugh) Can I use the SPLC to sue their law center for discrimination?
/r/MensRights27/09/12 12:56 PM
-2

I think it would be far funnier to grief the slutwalk dressed as women holding signs saying "Only Men can Stop Leaving the Toilet Seat UP" and "Down with Patriarchy UP with Toilet Seats"
/r/MensRights26/09/12 06:33 PM
9

Mmm... dunno... that morning dailymail outrage does get the blood flowing better than expresso. I suggest the trigger warning prefix: [Trigger warning: Daily Mail] to give people a heads up before they invest energy and emotion in a troll article.
/r/MensRights24/09/12 04:05 PM
0

You forgot the [Trigger Warning:SRS] prefix on your post.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 05:27 PM
1

Was I wrong for laughing at the 'your trigger warning may trigger those with triggers on triggers'? Well screw it. I laughed.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 01:55 PM
147

Your ex's tone leads me to assume the Yakuza runs the library at your kids school.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 03:59 PM
2

Don't be surprised if she claims a piece of his salary now; "After all, if it weren't for me, you wouldn't have gotten all this publicity in the first place!"
/r/MensRights20/09/12 12:28 PM
2

What would you call a movie where none of the male 'characters' have any positive attributes? Mz. Walker populated the movie with males that perform the same function as the xenomorphs in the Alien franchise. They lurk, infect, terrorize. The black male characters are the worst since "Birth of a Nation".
/r/MensRights17/09/12 09:52 PM
-4

He was probably musing, "Should I remind her not to make a cop movie with a latex dinosaur, or not to make misandristic movies?"
/r/MensRights17/09/12 09:08 PM
5

That looks like a highly masculinized space. I worry what is going on in there. They probably put too much masculinity in one subreddit and it collapsed upon itself into a masculine singularity - a virtual entity of concentrated broism that not even crossposts can escape.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 04:08 PM
6

$140 and six weeks of waiting tops. just in case you were wondering. Your college might even help you finish up your studies overseas. Singapore, South Korea - even Equitorial Guinea has more opportunities than indentured slavery here in the US.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 08:55 PM
1

I've often seen Animal Farm argued as an allegory about national revolutions, but it might be a new twist to argue it from the point of view of a 'feminist revolution of the west'. ( So we can have Napoleon represent feminists... Boxer - men and white knights, Muriel, MRAs; and the Sheep... SRS. )
/r/MensRights15/09/12 03:33 PM
7

Correction: Half of his assets. She gets to keep all of her loot from "Basketball Wives". In high school I remember having to go to special events outside of classes where you could hear about the dangers of drugs, how awesome the army is, and even one where some guy did tricks with basketballs. I'm thinking we need one of these where MRA's and older pro atheletes get young men together and tell them the fucking facts about what they have to expect and what is going on out here in the real world…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 01:47 PM
3

Maybe he's not getting punished for finishing a job or even helping out a female co-worker, but rather for helping out the 'wrong' co-worker - you know?
/r/MensRights11/09/12 01:25 PM
60

Actually, considering the number of pets that are snatched to supply testing labs and organized dog fights there is a far greater chance that 'some guy' wasn't the pets real owner. Did you ask him if the pet was really his? Could he prove it? Does he know Michael Vick or is he in the restaurant business? Or is he into intraspecies romances? Hey, it's nothing personal, just that's the reality these days, yknow?
/r/MensRights06/09/12 09:46 PM
10

Get 25 of those insults on a 5x5 board and we can play 'Shit Shit Reddit Says' bingo.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 01:17 PM
2

Perhaps if she wants a part of his disability benefits then she should share in the disability. You know, make her jump out of a blackhawk with a hundred pounds of gear on her back until her knee and hip joints are all worn. Then have a shotgun discharged next to her ears until her hearing is shot. A court supplied sniper can take care of the PTS portion of the disability, or perhaps a hidden IED somewhere on her work commute.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 04:54 AM
1

Feminists at UMD have a kind of a reputation for being overly judgemental and proactive in looking for reasons to justify persecuting male students. Since you are there to get an education, not battle with state funded misandrists I'd advise just drop the matter. They aren't above outing you or fucking with your transcripts if they choose, then playing the 'victim' card. If you want, just set aside a shelf in your house library for porn (and one copy of 'The Handmaiden's Tale' ) and label it 'UM…
/r/MensRights31/08/12 03:41 PM
2

I've suspected as much. Its only a matter of time before he decides to monetize his niche with Manboobz books, tapes, t-shirts, cartoon and (in)action figures.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 12:54 PM
8

Circumcision has always been an ancient solution in search of a problem. What evidence is it this week - acts of God, slave control or reduction in masturbation? Oh, now its 'health'. Well, evidence also supports observations people have made that UTI's increase with use of baby powders and failure to change reusable diapers. Wouldn't advising parents of these concerns make much more sense than the decision to view all male children as born defective and attempt to repair them with postnatal sur…
/r/MensRights27/08/12 09:58 PM
5

Circumcision has always been a solution in search of a problem. The justifications vary from culture to culture ( and is often telling about what those people value ) , but in reality its simply a form of child abuse. And that's that.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 09:14 PM
2

The counter is that the decision seems to be saying that all men are born defective. It kind of hard to avoid coming to that conclusion logically.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 08:58 PM
0

We'll see. Perhaps Jezebel will run my Onion-like parody article, "Unbound Feet might be costing us Billions".
/r/MensRights24/08/12 03:28 AM
160

You paid for it, you have a receipt. Use the Wonen's Center and flash the bill if anyone questions you. If fact, since you paid for it, you can complain that it doesn't really cater to your needs at all - except as a nice place to hold student Mens Rights meetings. wink Also, I thought that the faculty lounge was for, well, faculty who are very quick to guard what little perks they have.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 06:56 PM
10

The proper retort would be, "If the job also involves foot bindings then no, I probably can't. Unless you know of some 'medical benefits' for that procedure also.'
/r/MensRights23/08/12 06:37 PM
2

No, he should extend his critique to "Manchester United" at large. As English Primere League teams go, Arsenal treats its fans much more like adults than Manchester United. This is evident in the level of play, strategy on the field and even ads pitched on the sidelines. Even the name "United" has a ring of condescending patronization when compared to the lone cannon of 'Arsenal'!
/r/MensRights23/08/12 02:25 PM
3

Evidently there are some circles ( Free Republic ) that believe the anti-circumcision movement is a gay plot. I have seen people there voice the opinion that foreskins are the 'gateway drug' to decadence and homosexuality. So now you know.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 01:33 PM
2

The absurdity of the situation can best be illustrated with a joke: An African walking along one day trips over a yellow, metallic rock. He holds it up and says "What can someone give me in exchange for this?" Foriegn Minister Yang approaches him and says "In exchange for that rock I will give you a house, a road and a truck so you can also transport any other yellow rocks you find to a Chinese embassy". The man says, "Mmm. pretty good. Next Minister of State E. Ahamed approaches him. "I will bu…
/r/MensRights20/08/12 03:23 PM
4

Actually, once the story gets out about how a young man threw away his crutches and sprinted away after touching the poster, don't be surprised to see all sorts making pilgamages to the 'holy, healing MRA miracle site. Male feminists will touch the poster and realize that now 'they can see'. People who were dumb from radical feminism will find that now 'they can speak' Will someone find this young man so that he can witness to the miracle? Will he talk about how the demons that plagued him, torm…
/r/MensRights20/08/12 01:59 PM
7

What can you say? Another man healed through interaction with the Men's Rights Movement. Its a miracle! Hallelujah!!!
/r/MensRights20/08/12 01:34 PM
1

The liberal idea is radical egalitarianism, which leads to all of the above. Ok, so what politician or respected intellectual leader who described themselves as liberal support/voiced these opinions? Do you really think these 'ideas' are usual and typical of liberalism to a point where they have a history and serious support?
/r/MensRights19/08/12 11:27 PM
8

Projection. Jezebel is a very male unfriendly site, and I have never seen an article there bringing up the issue of rape in prison. Maybe they just don't take the issue seriously enough.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 02:19 AM
3

Trolls gotta troll.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 02:12 AM
3

Good point. Have any MRAs ever been interviewed on NPR?
/r/MensRights15/08/12 11:56 PM
-1

I have a pretty average penis, but when I was like 17 my girlfriend loved to make fun of it in front of her much older friends. It was devastating at the time. She sounds like a real nasty piece of work. Maybe your dick just knew better than to stick itself in crazy, and saved you from a whole lot of future suffering by rejecting her?
/r/MensRights15/08/12 07:35 PM
1

I bet they were practicing how to cut the wedding cake and in all the confusion the groom got stabbed. It's a shame his death could ruin her special day. Couldn't they clean the groom up, rig up a pulley system like "Weekend at Bernie's" and go through the wedding anyway?
/r/MensRights13/08/12 08:57 PM
-1

Where is my political and corporate power, exactly? I must have misplaced when I got my Unemployment. The power and freedom that come from not being seen as a nail that sticks out is easy to overlook.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 08:45 PM
3

I would be surprised if they didn't ask you more than once. This is okay, because it just provides you an opportunity to restate this preference. In the end its not in the child's best interests to an extent where they would risk a lawsuit.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 04:04 AM
10

Funny you should ask. Just went through this situation a week ago. Its worth a post by itself, but I'll cut to the chase. Most pediatricians are aware that circumcisions are cosmetic surgery and will back you up. Hospitals don't want to get involved in lawsuits or controversy, so if you repeatedly make the point known that you are against cosmetic circumcision whenever the issue arises, they will err towards safety and not do it. If you really wanted to be sure I suppose you could always go to t…
/r/MensRights06/08/12 09:00 PM
-10

Who's the smarter race? Whites surpass blacks on IQ test scores. Only if you don't count "How many times did you vote for George Bush Jr.?" as a test question.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 09:50 PM
1

Evolution isnt politically correct, and neither is science. But I.Q. tests definitely are political artifacts. And politics will be used to determine if these results are used to help men, hurt men or ignored/discredited. There have been arguments on the accuracy of turn-of-the century IQ tests. But nobody can argue that they weren't used to justify a lot of ugly politics, laws and eugenics. Feminists will be saying best that these tests justify quotas and setasides that 'close the gaps' in a di…
/r/MensRights15/07/12 09:17 PM
2

Hmm. There's something missing with that scale... SRS < Club Penguin < 2XC < Feminism < MRA There you go.
/r/MensRights15/07/12 04:20 PM
95

But now that this has set a precedent, what's to stop a guy from going to a "'gentlemen's club", getting drunk and spending a load of loot on dances and idiotic shit, then going to the police station and reporting a theft because he "would not have done it if he hadn't been drinking."? Well, aside from the laughter from the cops and an after-hours visit from the club's security staff that is...
/r/MensRights13/07/12 07:34 PM
7

Scumbag grandma got the cheapest thing she could find, and threw in a male shaming to distract people from the fact it isn't on the registry. She probably gives packets of corn flakes out to the mothers of boys so that "they won't masturbate and go blind"
/r/MensRights09/07/12 11:32 AM
7

Don't go to the freerepublic ghetto too often, but this was pretty revealing in 1) showing that conservative groups can be just as anti-mens rights as liberal groups and 2) revealing that there is a strong press on all fronts to portray anti-circumcision advocates as bigoted zealots.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 10:36 PM
6

Reads like a paid advertisement...
/r/MensRights02/07/12 06:33 PM
3

What did the letter mean by the officers were "cornering" the men in an attempt to get a panic reaction they could use as justification for arrest?
/r/MensRights01/07/12 11:12 AM
4

Could you put this in dollar terms? As in for every dollar a woman receives in retirement benefits, a man only receives ?? cents?
/r/MensRights23/06/12 12:31 PM
2

Don't. I think you did fine. Making art and expressing yourself after such an incident is critical. There's a good story in there that can be built on or expanded. Keep up the good work and writing - that's your best 'revenge'. Nothing so frustrates a 'gatekeeper' than when you surmount and pass them for success.
/r/MensRights18/06/12 01:34 PM
2

He keeps mouthing off like that and he might get his feminist card pulled.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 03:00 PM
3

As for president, I am voting for Gary Johnson. Lucky you. Unfortuately, my state kicked the libertarian and green party presidential candidates off the lists for the 2012 elections. I'll still write them in, but this attempt to keep voters from straying and voting for a non demopublican candidate leaves a sour taste in my mouth.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 02:56 PM
3

Absolutely. More drop-outs and problem kids means more jobs for judges and social workers. No way are they going to go with a solution that would have them unemployed.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 12:37 AM
1

I don't think it's really right to blame the shelters or social workers for this. They are there to keep people safe to the best of their ability. And what if 'the best of their ability' isn't very good at all? Point being - how can people determine if shelters or social workers overreach? How are they held accountable if they bring personal bigotries and biases into their professional duties?
/r/MensRights05/06/12 01:43 PM
3

"Well I was told to shut-up, but I can't help but feel a bit sad that you are against men having rights. But before you continue to make booze-fueled, possibly libelous statements about me, you might want to remember we still have to work in the same office. I shut up because I was told we were supposed to be having fun! Or are cheap shots and dog-piling on a colleague your idea of 'having fun'?
/r/MensRights03/06/12 06:37 PM
0

Regardless of whether it is being taught in the schools or not, it should be part of the "birds & bees" talk a father has with his son. This is pretty good as it is, but I would add a bit about how much the states and federal government are involved in disenfranchisng men, and what their payoff is (votes, money and slave labor).
/r/MensRights03/06/12 11:04 AM
5

In some countries child support is actually determined by figuring out how much a child needs to live in an area, then split between the parents according to ability. The problem with this solution is that it doesn't create additional work and income for lawyers. It is justified by saying that the child has a right to a certain 'lifestyle', but there was no guarantee that the child would have had that 'lifestyle' if the parents were together. And since it doesn't verify that the money is spent o…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 04:55 AM
11

A cape, maybe. A mask definitely. Got to have a secret identity, you know?
/r/MensRights29/05/12 04:18 AM
3

I'd be satisfied if she and her mother had to work off the 1.5 million doing community service involving real rape victims. Not my first choice ( that being working off the 1.5 million in a North Korean labor camp ) but I'm willing to compromise.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 08:23 PM
13

This is a good thing. You see, a number of us here have come to the conclusion that any man wanting to be married is kinda crazy. Evidently the experts agree, and merely want to document what kind of crazy they are dealing with. I'd like to think the test would be to the man's benefit with recommendations he go get a clue/spine/dignity/glasses. The test would be a learning experience in itself - sort of a marital eqivalent of the no-win Kobayashi Maru scenario that half of all men will find them…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 03:50 PM
2

Yeah, she got that in the settlement too, I bet.
/r/MensRights16/05/12 07:52 PM
7

I phoned the police myself to inform them of the situation, to which I got the response I expected (contact your attorney, it's a civil matter) So how is this a 'civil' matter as opposed to being a kidnapping? Are you allowed to sieze custody of the child whenever you like too?
/r/MensRights13/05/12 06:13 PM
2

The problem is that men know the statistics, have heard the anecdotes, and yet, still believe that divorce is something that happens to 'the other guy'. I think there might be some utility to using games and simulations to get the point across. Roleplaying is one option - "Divorce Court - the Role Playing Game" for those who lean towards realism, "Call from Cthulu - I'm taking the kids" for those who like 'fantasy'. Video games might be a method of getting the message out as well. There are a nu…
/r/MensRights10/05/12 02:31 PM
2

He can call them "Hussy Hints"
/r/MensRights09/05/12 06:39 PM
1

It kind of makes sense if you reduce communism down to being about property redistribution, and you point out that a number of the policies that feminists push also seem to be about property redistribution. I guess that's the logic involved. But then one might note that a womb could be seen as a 'means of production' and any good communist would be all about making sure that everyone in the state should have a voice in the management of said resource. I don't think that would be a big draw for t…
/r/MensRights08/05/12 01:51 PM
2

I notice she doesn't suggest the same solution for bullying amongst girls. True, but if she did, I'd like to imagine it being held in a Hello-Kitty themed Thunderdome.
/r/MensRights04/05/12 02:36 PM
3

That's the Democratic Party's schtick - all about carrots. The Republican version of playing to this crowd would have been all sticks and appeals to 'getting tough on deadbeat dads', wouldn't it? Correct me if I am wrong, but I don't see either party really speaking out for many of the Men's rights issues.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 03:25 PM
3

Thoughtlessness. Whether its due to stupidity, laziness or a mental disability is an exercise left up to the reader.
/r/MensRights01/05/12 02:32 PM
9

"Ret a re-rup" "What did ya say boy? What are you trying to tell me?!?" "Ri raid, ret a re-rup. Ray re-rup!" "Oh, you said you were depressed because your owner keeps eating your scooby snacks, and drags you into solving mysteries when you want to sleep?" "REE RUP RIDIOT!! REE RUP!"
/r/MensRights23/04/12 04:04 PM
4

Good point that. And what if this 'online - verbally binding agreement' said she was attractive and funny, but she wasn't? What if it turns out she had submitted a heavily photoshopped picture and she and her horsefaced friends brayed like mules at each others jokes and chewed with their mouths opened? And to top it off, they ordered the most expensive items on the menu? I can't help but wonder what would have happened if he had called the police department's fraud division during the middle of …
/r/MensRights17/04/12 12:54 AM
11

I can tell if the only thing the police have to do is figure out who ate what percentage of the stuffed potato skins. CSI - Applebee's.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 12:35 AM
4

If you continue to spend your life quickly confirming your own biases there's no limit to what you can't learn.
/r/MensRights10/04/12 01:27 AM
9

They had no trouble at all believing he was that calculating, cruel and sadistic, why not her? I can only assume that extending the same suspicions to her would have resulted in more work for them. And now they are stuck with that lingering, uneasy doubt about how many cases they pushed through where the unlucky man was innocent.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 08:19 PM
-1

To the weak, the fearful and the ignorant masculinity can be frightening.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 05:47 PM
34

Jezebel and SRS trolls aren't interested in serious discussion. They are dishonestly framing a question as a form of thought control. Suppressing thought and indoctrination is their goal. Everything about them is dishonest and crooked. They probably couldn't put a hat on without screwing it on.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 04:45 PM
2

Yes. You'll even be welcome if you don't agree with everything. Everyone gets downmodded from time-to-time, but as long as posts are intelligent and respectful, it won't happen on a constant basis. I'm wondering why this frequently asked question isn't in the FAQ section.
/r/MensRights09/04/12 11:20 AM
23

Ok, let me see if I can get this straight: A charity creates an advertisement that discriminates against men in the hopes that people will contribute money that will be used to discriminate against poor boys. Say... I wonder how that facial recognition software works on a fist?
/r/MensRights20/02/12 07:08 PM
8

Rationalize it with the 'observation' that when men pimp women, its exploitation, but when women pimp women its empowerment.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 06:55 PM
3

I get what you are saying, but there's a whole industry dedicated to putting out tv shows about watching people do stuff like fish, mine for gold and be 'real' housewives. Maybe its just another form of people watching. Now what the guy should have done was to continue to let her stare at him, then gently confront her by saying that her attention was flattering, but he was already in a relationship, but maybe they can have coffee - and hand her a fake number. If she comes back a few moments late…
/r/MensRights16/02/12 06:55 AM
6

Why? Statistically speaking, the odds are better that the teacher might have been molesting the kids as opposed to a complete stranger.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 05:19 AM
32

Your school has a zero tolerance policy? Ask to see it and review it carefully. Becasue you see, most zero tolerance policies usually stipulate that both students are punished for altercations regardless of who started what. If you are being punished and she isn't based on hearsay evidence, then you are being discriminated against. If you can make the school follow the letter of its own policy and punish her, she might decide that getting you in trouble isn't worth it if she suffers the same fat…
/r/MensRights15/02/12 02:29 AM
5

Now you are suggesting that he isolate her from her friends? Maybe its not a matter of isolation, but discoraging bad behavior. I'd suggest he try using a squirt gun or shaking a can with pennies in it when her friends start being manipulative, nosy, assholes.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 05:38 PM
1

I'd go as far as to say that men are adult males. Anything with an xy can be a male, but only males displaying adult human behavior can be classified as men. As for transsexuals, I'm willing to extend the benifits of earning the discriptors 'lady' or 'bro' if they demonstrate such qualities.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 07:43 PM
5

No, I think they would organize Bling-walks where they march in mass wearing their valuable jewelery and clothing, showing off their expensive, easily snatched personal electronics and carrying pocketbooks filled to the brim with cash. I can hear the chants now: "Hey-hey! Ho-Ho! I got a lot of dough!" and "I left my front door open, I bought a new TV!"
/r/MensRights08/02/12 12:22 PM
1

He needs to get a restraining order requiring her to keep at least 356400 km away from his person.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 06:59 PM
3

The biblical basis for marriage starts in Genesis, when says, “It is not good that the man should be alone” (2:18). The bible also says in Proverbs 21:9, "Better to live on a corner of the roof than share a house with a quarrelsome wife."
/r/MensRights04/02/12 02:37 AM
0

Who cares what those upvote begging circle-jerks think?
/r/MensRights03/02/12 06:02 AM
10

Oh, nonsense. Slapping isn't about doing injury obviously - its about humiliation. He was completly in the right morally to slap her back. That he was set upon by a pack of dogs does not make him any less right.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 02:46 PM
6

If not it would outrage nearly everyone. By striking back he lost the sympathy of some. Better to have the respect of men than the sympathy of dogs.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 02:32 PM
0

Who's running against this piece of dick-wagging trash, and how can I get him a donation?
/r/MensRights29/01/12 03:04 AM
3

If it was part of a larger pattern of behavior aimed at their indulgence rather than their child's benefit, I'd say yes. If the dad wears pink dresses in public and the mom likes dressing in army boots and looking like a lumberjack, and they can explain the benefits of this and why they raise their kids to do the same, then I'd lean towards no.
/r/MensRights21/01/12 03:56 PM
10

Seven years from now, the youngest, angriest MRA in the history of the movement hits puberty and decides to create the nation of Gilead.
/r/MensRights21/01/12 01:28 PM
7

Feminism, according to their dialogue, have never done anything wrong. "extremists who call themselves feminists" (and are championed with hushed voices, approving grins, political nods, and material citations) "aren't real feminists and we can't control them claiming as much". Maybe they should have a spin-off site: "The Good Feminists Project". If they do, I'll volunteer the first article talking about how a good feminist should buy her fiancee a watch worth 3 months of her paycheck.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 09:57 PM
1

Anything else would have been CLASS WARFARE!
/r/MensRights16/01/12 11:43 AM
10

Slavery and human trafficing is on the upswing worldwide, and second only to drug trafficing to income. Why shouldn't governments get a piece of the action too?
/r/MensRights15/01/12 08:16 PM
2

If you can't pay for your kids, don't have sex with women. Men are a bit slow on this point. If it were up to me, EvilPundit would make it 50,001. MRA's could also turn that around and note that women who can't pay for kids shouldn't be having sex, spend nine months conceiving, birth and not offer their child for adoption. But that would be seen as treating women as children who are incapable of making rational decision with their bodies like an adult. Funny how only feminists get away with that…
/r/MensRights15/01/12 08:06 PM
0

You left out the bankers. Again. Why won't anyone think of the bankers?!? And this hierarchy - is there a ranking? My liberal heart can only bleed so much in a day, and I need to know how much blood I should allocate for the homeless gay latino teen vs the disabled trans from Appalachia. Decisions, decisions.
/r/MensRights15/01/12 02:35 PM
6

Maybe, just maybe the Boy Scouts will be shamed by the GSUSA's taking the high road and relax their rules against gays and those dreaded athiests being in their 'private club'. I'd buy more cookies to support the Girl Scouts doing the right thing, but I refuse to buy more until they bring back snickerdoodles. Cmon. Work with me GSUSA.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 12:34 AM
1

Bingo. If something doesn't make sense to you, always ask, "does it make/save money for someone somewhere?" They probably had a budgeting problem, made a decision regarding funding sports that they knew people weren't going to like, and are blaming it all on Title IX like the political weasels they are.
/r/MensRights10/01/12 12:24 PM
18

But if the biological father makes a good bit less than the man who was stuck with the payments, the man may not ever get his money back. And what if the mother doesn't know who the biological father is? Would he be forced to continue to pay out child support with the state saying he will get the money back 'when they find the daddy?' And what if the father is dead? Would the man be out of luck, even if the mother had the money sitting in an account? In short, I don't see how this measure discou…
/r/MensRights09/01/12 04:53 PM
4

But, can someone please explain to me how the current policies promote gender equality, are fair, or good for american society? They don't. The laws are punative, insultingly patronizing to women, encourages corruption, weakens families and reduces fatherhood to the role of paycheck. So yes, this issue may have come up before here - once or twice. I'd also love some input from r/feminism Let me save you some time friend. Their input would be for men to 'man up' and accept the responsibility of t…
/r/MensRights08/01/12 09:17 AM
2

Classic demonization and disinformation campaign. There are a number of women involved in the MRA movement. I can't help but wonder if this article was aimed at them both directly and indirectly. Directly in that it frames MRA in a very dishonest light that discourages women from even investigating or sympathizing with our issues. Indirectly in that it was written to encourage negative reactions from MRA's - hopefully an overreaction that justifies their claims and makes lady MRA's feel uncomfor…
/r/MensRights07/01/12 06:05 PM
3

I tell you, that force lightning comes in handy for keeping squirrels out of the garden, but that static cling....
/r/MensRights07/01/12 05:05 PM
2

When I was a kid, one of the best things about Christmas was the empty tube rolls that we would chase and smack each other with. That is what I imagine this was all about. And now the law has taken that away too and made that assault. That is so stupid its painful.
/r/MensRights07/01/12 04:55 PM
6

Most feminists think that American men who marry foreign women do so because they like abusing third world women and are possibly human trafficers. Most feminists think that foreign women are little brown children who are dumb and passive and need big strong American women to show them how to put men 'in their place'. Feminists love destroying nuclear familes. Times are tough. Sometimes a lawyer needs to get out there and generate a little business on the side. And being the lawyer handling the …
/r/MensRights07/01/12 02:38 PM
8

From each according to his ability, to each according to her need of a makeover.
/r/MensRights07/01/12 01:25 PM
4

"Dad, what happened to my foreskin?" "Son, when you were very young the Circumcision Fairy visited you, and took that nasty bit off and left you with a handsome, shiny scar that repels diseases and fights AIDS." "Really?!?" "No. Your mom let the doctors slice you up when I left the room for a potty break."
/r/MensRights07/01/12 03:23 AM
12

Too late - saw the article without the required lead vest and polarized goggles. There's nothing to be gained from reading a jezebel story if you are a MRA - you aren't the target audience for their amalgamation of lies and bullshit. This is one of those things best ignored lest you fall for the feminist rope-a-dope.
/r/MensRights07/01/12 03:13 AM
0

Thanks for that reminder. I don't think it will completely solve the problem of ill intentioned postings because a good 80% of those people are trolls who get a charge from asshatting in public.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 05:25 PM
2

Hah! Oh those wacky feminists and their framed questions. The 'gentleman' described is neither a MRA nor a radical. Thanks for the laugh girls.
/r/MensRights31/12/11 04:25 PM
1

"The Devil, the proud spirit, cannot endure to be mocked." St. Thomas More
/r/MensRights29/12/11 05:51 PM
6

Is there any group on Reddit that has had more attempted spin-offs than MensRights? Kind of hard to keep track of them: MensRights, MensRightsModerated, Masculinsm, MensRightsRunByFeminists, MensRightsSpecialVictimsUnit, MensRIghtsCriminalIntent, MensRightsUK, MensRightsLifeOnTheStreets...
/r/MensRights22/12/11 04:43 PM
2

No opinion from me - just the observation that when men have huge organized men-only events they tend to fall along the lines of Promise Keepers or Million Man March events where you are told to act more responsible and adult like. Some women show up and they aren't barred, but they aren't the center of attention. Interesting to contrast those events to women only events like this music festival. I've never been to one, but it seems to have the same feel as one of those racist music festivals I'…
/r/MensRights19/12/11 12:11 AM
34

Kind of reminds me of that comparison between Christians in places like Afghanistan where you can be killed for praying vs those in America that think "war" has been declared on Christmas by saying "Happy Holidays"
/r/MensRights18/12/11 10:59 PM
6

Exactly. The Information Minister's paycheck depended on him repeating lies and bullshitting. Even if you had pointed out the tanks behind him, he would have said something like 'strategic maneuvering for pincer attack'. Likewise as a woman's studies major she has a pretty big investment in denying misandry. Odds are many of the jobs that she would be qualified for as a womans studies major would rely on her repeating the mantra of men are evil, women are saintly or some other nonsense.
/r/MensRights18/12/11 08:03 PM
1

Well, calling women "crazy" has been listed as a form of abuse according to some white knights.
/r/MensRights10/12/11 07:50 PM
23

"There are no heroes in this story, just an irresponsible asshole and her victims. " FTFY.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 05:01 PM
3

How about if we call circumcision MGM? Hope that helps with your epiphany.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 06:54 PM
10

I would have thought they would be too busy taking advantage of the Black Friday specials on hand lotion and fleshlights to post here.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 06:41 PM
0

How can people not be aware with so many shows that focus on winners of the "baby-daddy lottery" like "Basketball Wives" and "Real Housewives of XXX"? Its just that western society has gone from lauding producers to conspicuous consumers, middlemen and other leeches.
/r/MensRights25/11/11 04:20 PM
5

I'm not going to muzzle myself because someone might get their feelings hurt. Well that's one way to look at it I suppose. Others however might see all the cheap political knocks as decadent and self-indulgent. Are they aimed at helping men, as is the theme of this subreddit, or narcissitic ego-polishing that derails the conversations? I think most of the left leaning MRA's are simply people who have painted themselves into a corner politically for so long, they can't see a way out. As I see it,…
/r/MensRights23/11/11 03:18 AM
3

Q: Why all those animals? A: Leeches need a lot of blood.
/r/MensRights17/11/11 11:13 PM
2

After spending a good bit of the day wearing an angry mink around while riding a jaguar, I'm sure she's almost beyond caring.
/r/MensRights17/11/11 11:12 PM
5

Meh. I see is as a return to the pre-Disney fairy tales like Bluebeard and the original Sleeping Beauty stories that were soaked in blood and violence. And on that note, I'm sure they have a few public service announcements warning the kids to be wary of old women living in candy houses, that their new step-parent is going to make them count lentils in rags instead of going to the prom, and some guy will cut off your thumbs with scissors if you suck them.
/r/MensRights17/11/11 10:10 PM
2

Outside of school code of conduct rules, you'd be living a lie - which would probably be a lot of work the first few years or so to maintain that facade. And you probably won't be able to do your best work, because if you stand out too much you'll get unwanted attention. But as long as you didn't put down asian on any of your high school paperwork, and they don't ask your parents for their tax forms I suppose you could get away with it. But if you are found out, they'll probably go way, way out …
/r/MensRights15/11/11 11:54 AM
18

"Some may argue that the existence of a women's only room without an equivalent room for men is sexist discrimination and a violation of Title IX. On the other hand, ... this is Chewbacca. Chewbacca is a Wookiee from the planet Kashyyyk. But Chewbacca lives on the planet Endor. Now think about it; that does not make sense!."
/r/MensRights15/11/11 11:25 AM
0

heteronormative Hetero what?
/r/MensRights11/11/11 03:16 PM
2

Forward this to her or anyone else who wants to discuss the issue with you.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 03:43 AM
1

Seriously, i don't know the situation in the USA/Canada, but over here, if you recieve money for a specific cause, like, for instance to make a business trip somewhere, you're better be damn sure to keep every bill, because you're gonna get asked for it. Here in the US it works the same way, except in certain cases - that is, military spending, bank bailouts and child support payments. Here in the US I think they ruled that verifying that the money is spent on the child isn't in the child's best…
/r/MensRights08/11/11 02:43 AM
14

Agreed. He has a feminist bias because of his upbringing and family. He doesn't have any sons, so why should he care what sort of bigoted policies colleges implement against young men? I suspect all this pro-feminist activity is driven by a need to show that he did have some impact on US policy - because he isn't 'allowed' to make changes that could make a real difference. Its all an exercise in picking new fabric patterns for the Titantic's deck chairs. Keep the schleps arguing about what color…
/r/MensRights06/11/11 12:44 PM
2

Pretty much. The late-comers wanted to be calling the shots and when they were rebuffed for lack of senority or experience, decided to break off a chunk on the inside in which they could declare themselves queens. "GIRLZ CKLUBHOUSE - NO STINKY RAPE-BOYZ ALOWD" Tell them point blank - if they are going to set up their little bigots club, then they get the heave ho.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 11:49 AM
4

How the hell do you make up for something like that? By remembering that accidents happen, and making our prisons more humane rather than take the "tuff on crime" bullshit posture. Oh sorry our bad, but hey it's only 20 years right? Hopefully a pat on the back and a coupon for a free funny-face pancake at IHOP will put things right.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 02:34 PM
2

Child support is fundamentally a good idea. The sad fact is there are men out there who wouldn't provide for their kids at all if they weren't mandated to by a court. Well, while we are at it, why not have state run centers where mothers have to go to get pumped for breast milk, that is then tested for nutritional value, then bottled and UPSed to their house? Cause you know, breast feeding babies is a good idea too, but there are women out there who wouldn't provide for their kids at all if they…
/r/MensRights04/11/11 12:46 PM
1

Moral of the story - give her a fake. If she finds out and complains, it says something about her motivation to get married. Plus, nobody has ever been killed, injured or mutilated getting a fake diamond out of the earth, and nobody has been shot or hacked to death fighting over a fake diamond. Its probably best not to support that industry with as much misery as the product causes for men involved in finding and buying them.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 04:06 AM
8

Twice victimized - once by a rapist, then by a friend with insane revenge schemes and bad advice.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 03:46 AM
20

Hmm. Gets assulted while being told men should be wiped from earth. Sounds like a hate crime to me.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 01:47 AM
6

...off of a silver platter while relaxing in a limo.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 01:45 AM
3

Do you know what I find facinating about Taiwan? The weather. Ok. That and Hi-Chew candy.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 12:02 AM
4

If you pass by, suggest that he continue the Halloween dioramas with the underlying theme of 'things that scare feminists'. One year, it can be a 50's sitcom dad sitting in a living room looking thoughtful. Next year, a normal looking guy wearing a "Fathers4Justice" t-shirt. Another year, kids in a classroom learning math from a male teacher. A soldier saluting the flag. They'll be begging for a return of the gore.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 11:56 PM
17

Exactly. Now if he had modified his display so that it looked like a woman was perpetrating the mayhem they would have called it 'liberating' and 'empowering'.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 08:32 PM
-5

Forced? As in chained to a sink somewhere by their husband and made to take care of children? They aren't serious are they? But it wouldn't be the first time feminists took advantage of racism or ignorance to push their agenda.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 12:23 PM
1

Where's the one for feminists that has the shrew turning into a giant tapeworm?
/r/MensRights22/10/11 04:47 AM
1

Another idea: Tell the judge that you observe that Family Court isn't a 'real' court, so it seems an unneccessary expence to have real lawyers running them. Tell the judge he can quit and get a 'real' job and you can do his job for half the price. The taxpayer can save money, and you can pay your child support. Everybody wins!
/r/MensRights21/10/11 01:46 AM
0

Buy a passport. To assist in uh... job hunting overseas.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 01:37 AM
2

He has broken no laws. He has injured no one. So why is he in jail? Who says there aren't political prisoners in the United States?
/r/MensRights21/10/11 01:27 AM
1

Gotcha. Thanks for the correction.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 12:50 AM
0

I personally think it's great that she probably pushed a few more of the men who were there into the MRA camp by calling them 'boys'. That will be a nice little card to play if she decides to stir up shit again. Regardless of how you feel about OWS - she should get off her high-horse and get bounced off a car hood or get an eyefull of pepper-spray before she starts making demands on anybody out in the field.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 12:49 AM
12

They know what they observe. And what they observe is this: The economy isn't working ( for them at least )and does little more than enrich financial speculators and middlemen who coincidentally enough have hijacked the government through regulatory capture. And by regulatory capture I mean laws and tax policies that were engineered with promises of shared prosperity and resulted in shared liabilities for the majority and prosperity for a well positioned few. Most social animals develop a sense …
/r/MensRights16/10/11 09:12 PM
1

Well that's great, whatever anti-mr stance he did have, its likely a grudge now. You know, I know a lawyer who refused to handle the case of defending a car thief. The reason? His car was broken into, and he felt that he couldn't be a fair advocate because his emotions would bias him. Perhaps Mr. Gorman should bow out of the issue too, if he is as sensitive as you say and he takes his role as professional moderator seriously.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 08:40 PM
12

But these people are trying to change it into a "feminist movement" which disrupts things. Feminsm is increasingly being used as a very effective hitman for the status quo. It can operate on the individual level as can be seen in pursing Wikileak's Julian Assange or Strauss-Khan. It can dissipate the momentum of movements and energy of groups via divide and conquer strategems. This is the point of enabling 'feminist spaces' in the Occupy Wall Street movement. To accomplish what media spin and po…
/r/MensRights16/10/11 07:53 PM
6

Some immature guys will very quickly throw their bros under the proverbial bus just to get into the feminist movement with the hopes of getting laid. The worst kind of white knightism.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 03:31 PM
12

Women and governments would conspire to define withholding sperm as some sort of abuse. Marriage ceremonies would probably take less importance to women compared with baby showers.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 03:19 PM
1

The definition has changed over the years. Currently its commonly used as a pejorative by the right in their 'culture wars'. Earlier it was used to describe literally being 'in line with prevailing political thought or policy'. Examples: Flying the Union Jack in the US after the Revolutionary war. Wearing your 'I heart Fidel Castro' t-shirt in Miami. Saying how awesome the iphone is in the Android newsgroup. Sometimes it can get you laughed at or ignored, sometimes it can get you in varying leve…
/r/MensRights15/10/11 02:47 AM
-1

They actually go out and dig for stories and do real reporting - not just useless regurgitated commentary. In many ways they are a conservative version of Salon - slightly biased, but able to put out a good news product from time to time.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 01:31 PM
6

When you proudly describe the discussion you sparked as 'a shitstorm' then you are most likely a troll who takes pride in wasting people's time and energy as opposed to informing or entertaining them.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 01:08 PM
12

Out of that kitchen woman! I'm gonna make my own sandwich!
/r/MensRights12/10/11 09:14 PM
1

Do you know who's more responsible than the man? The politicians that decided to buy votes by allowing women the right to pressgang men into servitude for their reproductive decisions. It would be one thing if the child was the product of a marriage and he skipped out. Those women knew that they could pull this dangerous little stunt with people's lives. This was the cold blooded logic of a psychopath that knew the government would threaten violence on her behalf for a 'cut' of the action. Perha…
/r/MensRights12/10/11 04:31 PM
12

Bomb disposal technician, pediatric surgeon, air traffic controller, coal miner. But scootin kids around in a minivan has its moments too I suppose.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 01:38 PM
3

Politicians are the same the world over brother.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 11:00 AM
2

Yep. Maybe since all men are now 'suspects until proven innocent' we should have Perp Walks - our answer to the Slutwalks. So guys, break out the prison grays, orange jumpsuits, ball & chains. Might as well get practice at the perpwalk, because they'll get you one way or another.
/r/MensRights10/10/11 06:46 PM
5

Yes. But in those cases the terrorists were after hi-value targets for kidnappings or understanding the security of a protected area like an embassy or front gate of a military base. An ice cream stand in a mall is neither of these - and what intel would you need ( maps ) that isn't given away by the mall? If they were that worried about terrorism, just ban/search bags of any sort into the mall. That's what they actually do in places where this is a real concern. Photographs don't kill. Banning …
/r/MensRights10/10/11 06:24 PM
19

I'm sure she meant 'shocked by all the intelligent commentary' and 'offended by some of the hardships that men have to endure'. I feel that way myself.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 01:51 AM
1

It is about other people - other males who do face discrimination and loss of rights. If we want equal rights for men, we need to realize that it is a fight for equal rights for all men, not just a subset of men. Well, do you know what would be better than a logo change? A link going to an essay going into detail on this topic. Maybe add a few timely links in the list to the right. Ever notice how Google's logo changes at least forward you to something that explains the logo and informs you. Mos…
/r/MensRights03/10/11 08:07 PM
2

No. It's not your fault if this happens to you. You could, however, have mitigated the chances of this happening to you by dressing differently. Exactly. There's a reason that prey animals of lions aren't day-glo colored, and certain species of caterpillars have poison spines instead of ones that taste like chicken. Its to make themselves less of a target to predators. Nature has figured this out, somehow feminists are still struggling with this concept.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 05:57 PM
11

Blame it on a poorly translated recipe for duck l'orange.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 12:33 PM
14

The child isn't the victim here. The man here has been victimized three times. First by a con-artist that stole his labor. Then by a government that not only did not attempt to correct this injustice, but actually forces him into her bondage. And of course, society at large get their shots in too - laughing at his misfortune and treating the incident as a joke. Personally, I'm wondering what would happen if he refused to pay and dared the judge to enforce his verdict with imprisonment.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 10:51 PM
3

Women's Soccer = ENCORAGEMENT TO RAPE Anything less than hoopskirts and shawls sexualizes women in a dangerous environment and calls it a game. While nearly all of the men would never commit rape, they will condone it on some level by watching young, naked ankles sprint across the field. Horror! covers eyes, peeks through fingers Horror!
/r/MensRights25/09/11 11:28 AM
13

Ah... in English and French. Guess that makes them bi-ignorant.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 06:26 PM
13

"Sorry ma'am. I promise to be more of a bullying dick to the kids in the future."
/r/MensRights22/09/11 04:55 PM
1

Its also a "nice, fair solution" to having to count box office receipts I wager. I assume they are making up for the lost revenue by jacking up the price of non-alcoholic wine coolers/hard lemonade and making the womens bathrooms coin-ops.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 02:19 AM
5

Mancession? Feels more like a dudepression to me. I just pray its not the bropocalypse.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 01:58 PM
6

If I were you, I'd post a response on his blog saying exactly that. The beauty of it is, If he complains about your reaction, you can insist it was normal and rational and accuse him of "Gaslighting" you.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 03:14 AM
54

Yes, chivalry is dead when its mandatory behavior. It tranforms virtue into a rote reguation. Now do you know what would have been chivalrous? If the ladies had vocally protested anyone being forced to give up a set for their benefit. Were they handicapped?
/r/MensRights14/09/11 03:28 PM
7

Don't. Anything other than the advice given above will just provide an opportunity for the white knight manginas to perform their "I'm glad I'm not like that doode" pussy-begging dramas, and give the anarcho-feminists a target. The ipod says, "you can force me to come, but you can't force me to listen". That's all that needs to be said.
/r/MensRights14/09/11 01:36 PM
7

What an insult, but the pussy will just take it. Lets not prejudge him - he might attend the meeting dressed as a pimp.
/r/MensRights11/09/11 07:38 PM
5

Maybe. But look at her right hand. Her index finder is bandaged. Coincidence? Of course, as an ex D&D player, (Norman Rockwell was a role player too, I suspect), its pretty obvious to me that the husband came across the eye of Vecna and replaced his eye with it. His wife was obviously pretty upset with having an evil artifact in the house. He is deadset against its removal because 'it helped him with the General Mills account'. "It" of course, zapped her finger with a necrotic beam when she trie…
/r/MensRights11/09/11 03:28 PM
-1

Or... a reply to whining that is the equivalent of "Cool story bro." for women. Should say something to the equivalent of ' you have had a chance to vent. Now we are moving on to imporant shit. '
/r/MensRights02/08/11 01:32 PM
-1

Oboy, I shoulda known - a slapfight. Now if I were to counter-demonstrate a slutwalk it would be to dress like Eric Cartman did on that episode of South Park where he showed up on Maury Povich's show as an out of control teen. My chant: "Whateva, Whateva! I do what I want!" Right. Off to get a fat suit and leopard spandex.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 02:24 AM
1

Evidently, slaver... er, 'forced labor' - like torture - is "OK" as long as it does not result in organ damage or failure.
/r/MensRights31/07/11 06:09 AM
7

That's one dark skinned kid. Was the guy dating a drow elf or something?
/r/MensRights30/07/11 11:35 AM
3

Interesting indeed. I didn't know the same DAR who refused to let Marian Anderson sing at Constitution Hall in the late 30's were also hard-line feminists. Sort of ironic considering the effort feminists put into smearing the MR movement as racist, sexist and homophobic. A nice little fact to have in one's pocket for future reference.
/r/MensRights30/07/11 12:34 AM
3

So when is NJ Child Support going to do a 'sweep' to collect money from all those deadbeat moms that gave their kids up for adoption, donated eggs or lost custody for one reason or another? Oh, I forgot. That doesn't count, does it? Oh, " :( the poor children :( :( :( " indeed.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 02:43 AM
5

Taking a picture of her would seem to be a good step in that direction. "Yeah, you're not a kid, so its okay, right toots?" I mean, really. What's the point of having an ipad if you can't photo of an annoying person and let them see you drawing penises all over their face?
/r/MensRights29/07/11 02:20 AM
23

Its his own fault. Photographers that deal with aboriginal tribes in remote areas have to be proactive and explain to the natives that their 'magic box' does not steal souls. Best to walk away - or perhaps appease the angry, frightened female with a gift box of crayons to decorate her lipdisk with. Explanations should be delivered loudly and slowly in pidgin english to get the message across to the natives that they are, in fact, idiots.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 01:29 AM
3

What a great idea for a business - male tech support. Its just like Dell or Microsoft tech support, but it's manned by staff that you hand off your arguments to. The managers and second level support are experienced players, macs, pimps and PUA that can guide the interaction to the goals that you want.
/r/MensRights11/06/11 01:57 AM
40

When they came for the doughnut eaters I said nothing, because I was enjoying a cannoli.
/r/MensRights07/06/11 10:17 PM
7

Lots of different fires, and lots of ways to die in them. Does this rate a smoke inhalation death, a doused in gasoline death, a blanketed with white phosphorus death or the Brazen Bull?
/r/MensRights06/06/11 03:59 PM
1

The commercial would have made the same point and been a lot funnier if it challenged the guy to watch "Fox and Friends" or "The View" for five seconds. Seriously, either of those shows are on, and fight or flight impulses take over. That ice cream bar had better be hand-crushed-mint-Belgian-chocolate tasty for me to put up with trifling nonsense.
/r/MensRights06/06/11 03:50 PM
2

If a reverend wants to treat a marriage ceremony like a comedy roast, then heckling is allowed. "You suck!", "Everyone Hates You!", "I don't get it!" and of course... "Hey, organist, play Freebird!"
/r/MensRights06/06/11 01:53 AM
5

...and back payments - with interest.
/r/MensRights03/06/11 04:55 PM
1

Guess it depends on the state or country you are having the kids in whether or not marriage is worth it. Another big factor - why you want kids. Once you nailed down the why you can look into less risky alternatives.
/r/MensRights02/06/11 01:32 PM
3

Much safer to tell your kids to play "Incompetent Investment Banker" with money snitched from the coffee fund in the teachers lounge. "Sorry ma'am. We lost all your money playing the candy futures market. But if the principal will give us the funds lost, plus a 10% fee, we will replace 75% of the lost money."
/r/MensRights01/06/11 04:24 PM
8

Well, what do you think he should have done? His choice as he saw it was between slavery and oblivion. Some people would have been comfortable with slavery. But some would have taken the same viewpoint as Patrick Henry - "Give me Liberty, or give me death." - and the fucking well mean it. If you want someone to be angry with, be angry with a government that seems all to willing buy Petras votes with Peter's liberty - as long as it gets a 'cut' of the action. This tragedy wouldn't have happened w…
/r/MensRights31/05/11 05:03 PM
5

Incredible story. You really should try to share it with a larger audience.
/r/MensRights31/05/11 03:58 PM
11

I was a bit taken back by the accusations that he was making the entire post up on the "He could be an MRA. And here's something 'insane' those guys do...." argument.
/r/MensRights30/05/11 11:20 AM
5

I guess the question is the degree of wrong - rude wrong or criminally wrong. Is it just the breasts that are off limits for staring, or are legs or the head no go too? What if she was wearing a tshirt that said "Juicy" - would staring then warrent a suspension? Any parts of a guy that are off limits? Can I get people in trouble for oogling, say a "SpongeBob Squarepants" codpiece?
/r/MensRights27/05/11 10:19 PM
3

Because politicians exchange votes and money for your freedom. Make no mistake about it - for the majority of men in the west, once you become a father you are immediately delegated to second class citizenship. Just be sure to keep your eyes lowered (lest some woman accuses you of staring at her), smile and shuffle a lot, and you too can stay out of trouble.
/r/MensRights25/05/11 02:33 PM
2

Maybe the baby isn't reacting to the man, but to the mother's reaction to the man. "Hmm... mom's acting wierd, so I'll start crying. Waah Waah."
/r/MensRights25/05/11 02:14 PM
3

Pretty poor taste to respond to a victim's actual experiences and suffering with a wild surmise and made up statistics. "Sure a number of innocent people were burned to death as witches. But I'll bet an equal number of people guilty of witchcraft are flying round on their brooms, free as the breeze!"
/r/MensRights23/05/11 07:30 PM
1

Its recommended when you go into a situation like this that requires a direct confrontation you bring at least one other person with you to help. One confronts the potential rapist directly, the other helps the drugged individual.
/r/MensRights23/05/11 01:30 PM
9

Deserves is irrelevant. He did not injure her, nor affect her future ability to earn income. They weren't married. So there's no injury involved and no written agreements that were broken. So how does the law justify forcing him to give her money? What about the other hangers on?
/r/MensRights21/05/11 03:11 PM
10

Oh no, I for one am sure they are merely starting out on college campuses to build up their financial warchests so they can go out to do the real work in places where it is needed. Who's going to pass up the chance to lecture crooked UN soldiers, mercenaries and conscripted, armed teens in the Congo just to get a big check and BJ from a feminist lit major at Cozy-U? What anti-male lecturer wouldn't jump at the chance to waggle their finger in the faces of Taliban insurgents in the rocky deserts …
/r/MensRights12/05/11 03:02 PM
9

And some local feminists definitely did not "get" it. They would not accept the fact that a rape did not occur, and they worried that rape victims might not come forward because people did not believe a rape occurred. "I don't think any one of us (is) convinced that it didn't happen," said feminist Sherilyn Adams. "It's not uncommon for women to recant out of fear of retaliation . . . or denial--make this thing go away." It's hard to read this and not come away with the suspicion that feminism c…
/r/MensRights11/05/11 03:15 PM
1

Well, maybe he will be able to craft her a nice cell phone charm from the surgical sutures they remove from him in a month or two.
/r/MensRights10/05/11 05:49 PM
-6

Really? So let's pretend I just gave you a device with one red button on it. When pushed, it would instantly swap this lad... woman, for another woman somewhere on the planet who was in a refugee camp, or being shuttled about by human trafficers, or caught in the middle of a war zone. Could you push that button?
/r/MensRights09/05/11 04:04 PM
3

Perhaps the school superintendent was a righteous puritan, and knowing how God intended man to be clothed as punishment for defiling God's garden with knowledge and self discovery, was enraged to see Mr Davis not beating the youths senseless for displaying their bared chests as if they were heathens. Were they not afraid of the rage of the almighty as is proper for wise men?!? Such wanton displays he mused, could only mean they were frolicking to a witches coven, where old scratch himself would …
/r/MensRights09/05/11 04:10 AM
1

It negotiates discounts for members at local retailers and service providers. Do tell. Is this list available? Because I for one can't help but wonder how many local retailers and service providers want to be known as offering discounts to a parenting organization that discriminates against fathers.
/r/MensRights09/05/11 03:39 AM
14

Would have been better if the police had strung her along and gave him a fake funeral too. They could have had him sit up, hop out of the casket and chase her around the church a bit.
/r/MensRights27/04/11 07:59 PM
4

Worst case scenario: "Sure... we'll make the sandwiches...just make sure you eat them. Every bite."
/r/MensRights25/04/11 01:40 PM
-1

Well they were 'hatin'. Guess that they lost it when they saw his milkshake brought the boys to the yard...
/r/MensRights24/04/11 04:06 PM
2

I think that I can make a better case for a "Real Women Don't Make False Rape Accusations" campaign. After all, nobody is for child trafficing, but there are lots of people that defend false rape accusations for a variety of reasons from dogma to profit, and they are far more damaging in that they errode respect in the law and system by destroying it from within.
/r/MensRights17/04/11 08:34 PM
7

Is it possible to be a bigger troll than to accuse someone of being a molester by playing ball with their daughter? I mean, that hits every rage button in a dad's head. Personally, if I were mean0dean0, I would have taken advantage of the officer being there and get her to admit to him that she had been asked several times to go away, and she insisted on harassing them. Next stop - the courthouse for a restraing order against her for harassment - easy to get, especially if the harassment is docu…
/r/MensRights13/04/11 02:13 PM
3

I've been told some women consider it harassment to be stared at in the gym. I'm willing to bet that a quick reminder of such a point of view would get the busybodies minds back on their own workouts, less they be reported to management as lechers and asked to leave.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 01:04 PM
3

Or... she could have been a madam looking to separate a father from his daughter so she or her accomplice could steal the child. Did you know that human trafficking (slavery) is the second highest money maker for criminal organizations worldwide? And who better than a woman to snatch a child? mean0's lucky. If she had succeeded in getting officer dork to take him in, his kid would probably be working in an underground factory about now, stitching soccer balls together for a bowl of mush.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 12:58 PM
8

Anyone have a list of male-only colleges available? Need to know how much to start accumulating for my kid's college funds.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 12:59 AM
3

Sounds like a classic example of a hate crime to me. Sadly law enforcement has some catching up to do before they start pursuing it as such.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 11:24 PM
1

She apparently worked with rape victims, so she's personally connected to the issue. There's nothing wrong with being emotional in general of course, but in the middle of a state congressional session? And she's so sure about something that's completely wrong! I kinda understand where she is coming from - both are two pretty hot button issues. Easy enough to diffuse - just walk them through the thought process slowly: "Have women lied about being raped in the past?" "Yes." "Have they lied about …
/r/MensRights07/04/11 01:21 PM
3

Lots of downmodding for 'letting the cat out of the bag.' I for one, think her post should be made mandatory reading before any US marriage takes place.
/r/MensRights05/04/11 07:46 PM
2

Sorry, I'm all out of privilege. Can I borrow some from you?
/r/MensRights28/03/11 04:30 PM
12

Feminists take note: While NC has been working to pass this very pro MR law, they still uphold and protect the woman's right to choose. Recognition of MR issues doesn't mean less recognition of women's issues. In short - feminists need to do a better job of picking their battles. Because while they are wasting energy demonizing MR, they are losing real progress elsewhere.
/r/MensRights24/03/11 06:52 PM
2

He would be challenged to prove it was done with the intent to injure, knowledge of its falseness then show said injury. Proving all three is difficult.
/r/MensRights24/03/11 06:25 PM
8

To me, this is clearly not an issue about men's rights, but about general ignorance when it comes to the legal process. Actually, seeing how they are censoring information about in incident that happened in a public space involving public officials because the initiator was a SWF I find it challenging not to see it as a MR issue. The legal process is more about making sure that everyone's rights are respected by the law. It was not intended to be used to protect the reputations and social standi…
/r/MensRights22/03/11 04:15 AM
13

I'm a bit amused with how they think that banning it will drive guys away.
/r/MensRights18/03/11 08:05 PM
3

Pixar starts a project with the question of how to tell a great story. Disney starts a project with the question of how to make the most money. They probably thought the 'features' you mentioned guaranteed them a box-office winner according to their marketing research.
/r/MensRights16/03/11 07:49 PM
48

She tossed his property out of one of the study rooms, then accused him of holding her against her will. That could be seen as stealing, and definitly lying. Fun fact: Many schools have a honor code that covers such student misconduct. In fact, not reporting such possible violations is considered a violation. Its up to the committee to decide if worth pursuing or not.
/r/MensRights14/03/11 05:47 PM
14

Yeah, he was behind the eight ball on this one. Dealing with a manipulative, dishonest girl who was also the daughter of a law enforcement officer. Still when dealing with cops in these situations, I suspect it would be more advantageous to appeal to experience and not to be suckered with fake tears, than to make headaches for them.
/r/MensRights14/03/11 03:01 PM
11

Maybe he has low self esteem and can't make eye contact with people. In which case her assumptions that he is oogling her cleavage is subjecting him to a sexist stereotype. How dare she. ಠ_ಠ
/r/MensRights14/03/11 03:35 AM
2

The whole site. If this is what being a good man is all about, I'm popping my shirt collar.
/r/MensRights12/03/11 02:40 PM
4

"What? Thugs in brownshirts smashing your windows and stealing stuff? Well, the National Socialists work to fight the rising rate of crime in this country!"
/r/MensRights12/03/11 02:02 PM
3

Funny. Bond goes out and gets shot at, nearly boiled alive in a nuclear reactor, almost fed to sharks, dodges decapitation by killer yo-yo, flees exploding volcano hideout, gets beaten nearly to death, hit in the nads with a bludgeon, dragged behind a boat over razor sharp coral, almost bisected with a laser, kicked at by a crazy russian lady with a knife in her shoe, dodges getting chewed on by an assassin called "Jaws", almost gets drowned repeatedly, is waterboarded, suffers betrayal by his f…
/r/MensRights11/03/11 12:31 PM
2

The brilliant part is getting guys to pay $5 for the privilege. If I had offered them $5 to walk about campus in high heels, they would have slugged me. You charge them, and cognitive dissonance kicks in. "Oh! Its for a good cause!" Really? I mean, is there anyone who isn't aware of problems with violence against women?
/r/MensRights10/03/11 07:38 PM
8

If it does not involve specific discrimination against men, it is not a MRA issue regardless of how much I 'care' for the issue or not. I care about women dying at dangerous jobs. This does not make it a MRA issue. If you have a specific case about a worker forced to do an unpleasant/dangerous task specifically because he is a male, then yes, you have a MRA issue. Those have been brought up here before - specifically the 'in case of fire men wait for women to leave first' workplace rules. What y…
/r/MensRights09/03/11 08:19 PM
6

Another of the plaintiffs was a social worker who monitored "supervised visits" of children and who had driven the daughter between her parents' houses. The social worker was already unhappy about being involved with the case because Dianna had once tried to "hire someone to follow her outside of visits," but she elected to stay on because the daughter was making "significant progress" during her visits with Duke. Piss off your case worker. That's certainly thinking outside the box.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 01:05 AM
2

Where there is passion there's the opportunity for comedy. He should have gone with the vote and mined the topic for what its worth, and written correctly it would have been funny for everyone. Example - the push to have quotas for women on boards of directors. Have Alice get on the org's board and have a months worth of strips on upper management stupidity. Or you can have Carol get on the board, or have all the women for the strip jockey and maneuver to get the 'one' golden seat on the BOD. In…
/r/MensRights08/03/11 05:17 PM
2

The reality is that women are treated differently by society for exactly the same reason that children and the mentally handicapped are treated differently. Ouch. Where did I put my 'look of disapproval'? Its around here somewhere....
/r/MensRights08/03/11 03:51 PM
6

There are plenty of examples of men getting a raw deal. This isn't really one of them. Of course. How could a sexist policy that appeals to myths that men in general care less for their children and communities than women and results in less opportunities for men independent of what idea they have that needs funding be considered a raw deal? It is a puzzle, isn't it? Still, it provides equal opportunity for feminsits to travel about and have a bit of adventure just like the guys. That they also …
/r/MensRights06/03/11 07:11 PM
17

Creep just means 'this man is attracted to me but I find him unattractive'. But what about the cases where the woman finds the man attractive, and the man is unattracted to her? Wouldn't she be a creep then? Or is he immediately labeled 'gay'?
/r/MensRights06/03/11 06:20 PM
3

Eunichs. Because they are castrated slaves. Edit: Also, eunichs are the ideal male from the feminist POV. Testosterone free nutless wonders that are tame, obedient and best of all - 'safe'.
/r/MensRights04/03/11 03:43 AM
1

Of course. What better way of showing how strong, responsible and independent feminists are by having them support these poor children. Feminists are often talking about how superior they are - well this is an opportunity for them to actually demonstrate this through action and charity.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 02:35 PM
-1

Would throwing your shoes in the direction of a judge with the intention of falling just short of her and hitting the bench be considered free speech? Still, I hope if it does occur in her courtroom that she sees the very human side of it, and is just as understandable.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 02:15 PM
11

Who are those sex workers to say what they can do with their bodies?
/r/MensRights26/02/11 12:30 AM
4

The success of women has completely upended the historical relations between the sexes, which adds to the confusions of pre-adulthood. When I say success, I am not cheerleading. Women are getting more degrees; the latest Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers show that by age 23, there are 164 women with bachelor’s degree for every 100 men. Not surprisingly, then, in most large cities of the United States, single childless women are also out-earning men. These are simply facts. She just does not get…
/r/MensRights24/02/11 06:17 AM
3

Don't forget Ms. Hamdy, the government official that shut down his apple cart and slapped him when he dared resist. Never say that feminists don't make a difference.
/r/MensRights20/02/11 06:00 PM
-2

I'm sure a number of muslims were saying, "oh look, when we legally execute scheming, slutty homewreckers to death with legally approved rocks, that bad. But when Christians do it with soft drink cans, its OK! How politically correct!"
/r/MensRights11/02/11 02:09 PM
3

Probably because they think its more of a black male problem than a male problem; "Why did she have to say it was a black guy? Why not a guy with a beard? Let the Unix administrators get stopped by the cops for a change. Yep. Lucky, lucky white guys never have to worry about false rape claims!"
/r/MensRights09/02/11 06:29 PM
45

What we need is a at-home test for guys to administer. Take a sample of her fluids, wait 15 minutes and check the window.... A horizontal line means she's crazy. A vertical line means she stopped taking her birth control pill. A plus means... you should pull out - of the relationship.
/r/MensRights07/02/11 04:21 PM
1

Hmm. The judge probably took a bribe to throw the case and is using the 'boys will be boys' excuse as a distraction.
/r/MensRights04/02/11 03:01 PM
4

"OMG, never hit a woman!" "Recognize your privilege!" drops to floor, performs flare break-dance move, hops back up "You just got served!"
/r/MensRights03/02/11 08:35 PM
1

I didn't get it either. It was probably funnier when initially queefed, than when posted.
/r/MensRights02/02/11 06:08 PM
4

Second of all, the courts are looking at this all wrong. This guy was essentially a sperm donor. As they said, the sperm was a gift. I always thought that the sperm wasn't a gift, but rather licensed with the use restricted to personal recreational purposes only. Turning it into a baby meant she was making multiple illegal copies of his genetic code. He should have sicced the RIAA on her ass. Lesson learned. Me, I'm going into buisness selling underwear with EULA's printed on them.
/r/MensRights02/02/11 01:31 AM
30

"No, you cheeky bastard."
/r/MensRights01/02/11 05:20 PM
42

Chase ended up asking that loathsome cunt out - again - when I would have just called the cops. Maybe he's setting her up for a larger payback in the future. Is there a "human centipede" themed episode coming up next?
/r/MensRights31/01/11 03:33 PM
3

Not surprising. Despite claims by some subreddits, feminism is dependent on bureaucracies and can't exist without a repressive state apparatus to redirect wealth or productivity at gunpoint.
/r/MensRights29/01/11 03:20 PM
2

"Hey baby, since you are so free of the old gender roles, the gutters need cleaning out, and you can crawl under the house and get the lawn aerator for springtime. I'll be making dinner." sits in chair in front of window with homebrew beer, watching the 'show' and humming "Sisters are doing it for themselves"
/r/MensRights26/01/11 02:29 PM
4

So important it needs to be repeated - for men and women: Be careful about subsidizing your woman. Whatever woman you hook up with, make sure she has and keeps a job. If they have an immature relationship with money before the marriage, odds are it will continue after the marriage. If they are habittually begging, run.
/r/MensRights26/01/11 10:48 AM
1

Future generations will marvel at how Americans were completely blind to "Valentines Day Disappointment Domestic Violence", and how it had the 'highest level of domestic violence of any holiday'. "Factors such as undersized bouquets, cheap cards and bad chocolates contributed to the high numbers" noted the experts.
/r/MensRights25/01/11 01:46 AM
2

Exactly. But its pretty striking how Tyra Banks feels comfortable talking about such issues on her show, isn't it?
/r/MensRights22/01/11 02:26 PM
1

Oh no... thank you. Really. Whenever anyone talks about how 'crazy' MRA's are, we will merely state most of the oddball posts and comments are trolls. Then link back to your post and creepy troll 'lol'. For you see, we've often suspected most of the dingbat posts were trolls, but its very rare to actually have one clumsy enough to be appropriatly tagged in the wild. So good job. Keep on trollin!
/r/MensRights21/01/11 07:41 PM
2

That's how the elite flaunted their wealth back in the day. Wouldn't know if I would call guys like Sir Walter Raleigh and Edward de Vere or their contemporaries sissies though. I can't help but wonder what they would say if they could comment on today's fashons. Piercings? Tattoos? Oversized clothing with pants hanging off the ass exposing your underwear? Cap on sideways like a child? I'm sure they would have choice words for us as well.
/r/MensRights21/01/11 02:16 PM
2

Couldn't care - hold on let me try.... and... no. As I was saying, couldn't care less. The guy who posted his victory on gaining custody of his kid from his loser ex? That's who this group is aimed at. Not the creepy feminsts with multiple accounts who stalk and troll this subgroup fantasizing they are fighting misogynists.
/r/MensRights20/01/11 05:18 PM
4

I find nothing modern or manly about this list.
/r/MensRights19/01/11 04:00 PM
1

Huh. I wonder how many wedgies he gave boys before he realized that he had to give some to girls in the name of 'equality'. Poor kid was just trying to meet his wedgie quota before the Department of Justice fined him for discrimination.
/r/MensRights18/01/11 07:30 PM
3

Easy for you to say - you aren't over here in the middle of a crimewave of random pea-shootings, noogies and wedgies.
/r/MensRights18/01/11 06:10 PM
1

You can never start pigeonholing kids as 'troublemakers' and 'miscreants' too early, amirite?
/r/MensRights18/01/11 02:43 PM
0

Hilary Clinton said recently that womens rights and womens empowerment is now at the core of US foreign policy. Someone needs to tell the first mangina president to go get his nuts back from Hillary.
/r/MensRights17/01/11 06:09 PM
42

So crude gestures aren't considered free speech anymore? Interesting....
/r/MensRights17/01/11 02:32 AM
2

Yes. I can see this happening... reminds me of a Century 21 commercial.... Hitler: It’s not the point, the point— Eva: [Pointedly]: What is the point? What? Eva: I hate those Gypsies . Plus the Jews. Hitler: They never did anything. Eva: They stabbed us in the back. Eva: What? [At the 0:14 mark, the wife makes a very brief but hate-filled gesture toward her husband, thrusting her face at him with a look of contempt and repulsion on it.] Eva: Eichmann researched this! Eichmann : This ethnic clean…
/r/MensRights17/01/11 02:14 AM
2

Sledding on a hill? I thought he was sacked for letting them ghostride the school bus on a field trip.
/r/MensRights14/01/11 02:49 AM
2

Valentine's day can be fun for girls and guys. Personally, I love having a little celebration of our relationship. It's always a good time. Well, I guess if you are into those dumb, herdlike events, Valentines Day can be fun. Most men I know value their freedom, and kind of resent the blackmail aspects of the holiday. They see it as more confining that liberating. Plus, it's not like most of the people on r/mensrights are actually getting dates for Valentines Day. Seriouly? I hate the commerical…
/r/MensRights14/01/11 02:32 AM
1

I'm sure that the Dredd Scott case was fairly well argued as well, but that didn't make it any less inhumane or immoral. But the funny thing is this - you'd think this would be a slam dunk. the surgeon is little more than a 'deadbeat dad' who stuck someone else with his obligations. Obligations that the State of Ohio would have been very vigorous is pursuing regardless of the husbands suspicions or even ability to meet. It seems that this ruling at worst argues that fathers have no real rights t…
/r/MensRights06/01/11 08:32 PM
1

Your point has merit. Cougars are given a pass - unless they are creepy cougars with a Twilight fixation.
/r/MensRights04/01/11 10:03 PM
1

creep (n) annoying, unpleasant person. Well, just as you can call some guys 'cunts' you can call some women 'creeps'. There are plenty of examples of women creeps - the stalking ex, the office gossip, the freeloading buy-me-a-drink barfly, cougars - feminists that stalk the MR board and downmod posts with sockpuppets - how are they not creeps?
/r/MensRights04/01/11 05:51 PM
3

Well, among other things, its an abuse of the moderation system. Which fits nicely into the theme of this subreddit - abusive women manipulating the system for gain. I for one would love to hear how these ladies justify refuting the same stereotype they are acting into.
/r/MensRights14/12/10 10:00 AM
1

Now, we were comparing compulsions with damaging outcomes. Waving away a shopping compulsion by equating it to 'buying shoes', while not 'retarded' is very dishonest. tldr: You are not going to improve reductio ad absurdum logic with ad hominem attacks.
/r/MensRights14/12/10 12:43 AM
7

Yeah, mine would leave the house a bit of a wreck as well, and the TV would always be on Oprah. The funny thing is once we found ourselves without daycare so I burned some leave for a few weeks staying at home with the newborn. Had all the household chores done by 10ish and spent the rest of the day watching the kid and daytrading. Would bake cakes from scratch just to show boat, which irked her a bit. "Oh was this house-thing supposed to be hard? My bad." Its amazing what you can get done if yo…
/r/MensRights13/12/10 08:22 PM
3

Even if he did know, what good would it do? He'd end up divorced and charged with 'financial abuse'.
/r/MensRights13/12/10 08:05 PM
1

Is is really a friendship when you can't warn off your friend from doing something that will cause them future pain? The advice columnist seems to advocate 'good enough' friendships and she pooh-pooh's the friends concern in favor of cheering superficial 'you go gurl' consumerism-at-any-cost.
/r/MensRights13/12/10 08:03 PM
1

Isn't this like accusing a person concerned with a friends alcoholism of being jealous of their huge collection of velvet "Crown Royal" bags?
/r/MensRights13/12/10 07:50 PM
8

...and the boy grew up to have a hit TV show beloved by billions: "OW My Balls!"
/r/MensRights10/12/10 07:53 PM
1

Ah. So, if some man entered the wrong car because of illiteracy, language differences or inattention, the proper resolution of the mistake is a beating? And what if one of the men decided to exercise his rights of self defense and fight back? Then what?
/r/MensRights10/12/10 05:35 PM
4

Thanks, you are so helpful. But what I want to know is do you call this informal fallacy of yours a "Straw man argument" or a "Straw person argument"?
/r/MensRights09/12/10 05:45 PM
18

I blame this on the current glut of 'reality' shows like "The Real Housewives of " that made celebrities out of and glorify useless trophy wives.
/r/MensRights09/12/10 05:28 PM
2

Well, it's pretty hard to claim the moral high ground with such dishonesty. Probably more of a release valve for some of her inner demons. It makes me wonder - is there an element of misogyny in feminism? How much of that movement is driven by hatred of other women and self-loathing that is projected upon men? Something to think about.
/r/MensRights08/12/10 08:16 PM
8

Hey, it's the old 'If you're being raped you might as well leeeeaaaan back and enjoy it.' quip. Does this hussy have no shame? And as for her knocking the right to bear arms, I'm willing to bet ladies like Annie Oakley made a far more compelling argument for suffrage than any of the feminists of the time. You going to tell anybody who can hollow out a dime at a hundred yards they can't vote? Don't think so.
/r/MensRights01/12/10 05:37 PM
1

What...the...fuck Sigh. ROT13. We also have something called 'Google' that provided a link-->Click this with your mouse to online tools. Kids these days... Next order of business: my lawn. Remove yourself from it.
/r/MensRights29/11/10 12:13 PM
2

MRA MATH QUIZ Bathroom 'G' has fifteen women waiting outside to use it and five inside. Bathroom 'B' has zero men waiting outside and zero men inside. If two women decide to use bathroom 'B' and are caught inside as a man enters, how many push-ups are they forced to do? Answer: Abar. Gurl gbyq uvz gb 'Purpx uvf cevivyrtr.' (rot13)
/r/MensRights29/11/10 05:08 AM
4

Woman also really don't have much equality in India (with respect to us), and they aren't going to receive much legal help if they get sexually harassed Which pales in comparison when you take into consideration that the men in India don't receive much legal help if they are actually assaulted. As much as you might hate discrimination in this subreddit, this is India. There's an assault element in this as well, but apparently that was forgotten in the rush to justify discrimination. Do carry on.
/r/MensRights28/11/10 11:29 PM
1

In a free market economy, no. No I don't. If the person working thinks they are being underpaid, then they shouldn't have trouble moving to a better paying job, and they have the freedom to do so.
/r/MensRights27/11/10 07:43 PM
11

For 56 million, he could have probably hired an army of 'professional escorts' to constantly steal boyfriends from his ex.
/r/MensRights23/11/10 01:58 AM
17

Really. After the trust fund veto, I would have been, 'fine, I'll spend every bit of that 56 million to get custody of my kid away from you'.
/r/MensRights22/11/10 08:53 PM
4

Ugh. Worst pickup line ever. Second worst: "Are you a parking ticket, cause you got "Pay ME $120" written all over you.
/r/MensRights20/11/10 05:28 PM
54

"Oh yes, please, come quickly. There's a black gang and a white gang engaged in some sort of conflict at my local children's park. There have already been some casualties... hard to say how many... maybe 16 on each gang... oh hurry, hurry!" trollface "Problem, chess geeks?"
/r/MensRights18/11/10 03:20 PM
7

The entire board is a hilarious living joke. Pretty much....But also a highly ironic lesson on the abuse of power. starts air guitaring and humming "Symphony of Destruction"
/r/MensRights16/11/10 08:27 PM
1

If the guy was guilty of anything, it was trusting in the fairness and impartiality of the system. He didn't realize that feminists have rigged it into a flesh-rending trap like something out of a "Saw" movie serial. Fortunately we have a Supreme Court that handles these sort of unconstitutional excesses. Lamentably, they are more concerned with assigning human rights to artificial constructs.
/r/MensRights15/11/10 04:29 PM
3

you have been banned from posting to Anarchism: Unremorsefully Anti-Capitalist and Anti-State. Well, that took no time at all..Only about 2 hours of disagreeing with them, in fact.... Ever hear about the cuckoo bird? It lays its eggs in another bird's nest, then when its chicks hatch they push all the non-cuckoo birds out for not being cuckoo enough. That, is anarchism in a nut- ah, eggshell.
/r/MensRights15/11/10 04:09 PM
-1

Should be in the editorial section of all western newspapers...evil chuckle
/r/MensRights08/11/10 08:55 PM
1

He should have an additional bit added to his will requesting a cremation and an industrial blower dispersal of his ashes in the Child Support Enforcement office in LA County. "He also left you guys a note, 'Kiss my ash'."
/r/MensRights08/11/10 05:39 PM
2

Huh. I can't help but imagine it went down like this.NSFW
/r/MensRights05/11/10 10:01 PM
6

Yes. Yes he was. If I were him, I'd have a talk with the school administration on what he experienced. See if they can agree on having a mandatory seminar for feminist instructors on campus: "Sexual Harassment Abuse - Just say NO!" to make them aware of the issue. This seminar as I envision it would be paid for out of their education stipend to cover the gentleman's time and unique experience. Have them watch a little movie on sexual harassment abuse, interact in a few role playing exercises, a …
/r/MensRights05/11/10 09:49 PM
6

Considering all the hoopla about "Twilight", I expected "let him get bitten by a vampire" to be a suggestion.
/r/MensRights03/11/10 04:57 PM
4

Well, that sucks. Good bye Green Party. Too bad "Ducks Unlimited" hasn't decided to transform into a political party. 'Environmentalists with Guns' would probably be a winner.
/r/MensRights03/11/10 04:37 PM
1

He needs to divorce her before she can divorce him. That simple.
/r/MensRights01/11/10 05:06 PM
13

What's 'check your privilege' in Latin, so I can kick any argument up a notch with an air of scholarship?
/r/MensRights30/10/10 01:03 PM
15

Who's the daddy? Uncertainty allows mothers to select for their children the father who would be best for them. Ah yes, the "Won't somebody think of the children - Gimmie,Gimmie!!" slight of hand. But in making paternity conditional on a test rather than the say-so of the mother, it has removed from women a powerful instrument of choice. I’m not sure that many people are much happier for it. Can you believe this vile little gnome? I wonder how many unhappy 'instruments of choice' the suffrage mo…
/r/MensRights29/10/10 03:36 PM
5

Pfft. Easy. Sooo many ways. "Well, since you're not going to act like an adult, I guess I'll have to 'man up' for both of us" chuckle Well, If I had said that, I would be accused of being a sexist pig. Regardless, are we here to discuss issues, or trade cheap shots?
/r/MensRights29/10/10 12:25 AM
2

whips out a pair of spoons and plays them on knee
/r/MensRights28/10/10 11:39 PM
2

some balls are held for charity...
/r/MensRights28/10/10 04:31 PM
7

meanwhile, in the White House... "Hmm....Investigate the role of banks in mortgage securitization fraud, or pursue commodities fraud allegations, or go for the easy 'we arrest wife-beaters'?" "Well, the finance industry are my best supporters... and the ladies luuuuv a white knight... so..."
/r/MensRights28/10/10 04:26 PM
2

Anarchists with moderators. Sounds like a failapalooza on the failboat to me.
/r/MensRights28/10/10 03:11 PM
1

If women ruled the world, then you would have fraud cases where a man finds out that he isn't a child's father, but still has to pay support because it is in '"the child's best interests". Oh, wait a minute...
/r/MensRights26/10/10 06:34 PM
1

For me fashion is driven by function. So that would work for leisure summer activity, I guess. I'm more amused at a designer being recognized as a 'master of cut-offs'. That requires what - knowing how to use a pair of scissors, right?
/r/MensRights26/10/10 02:06 PM
6

Maybe they are pissed about the 'patriarchy' cutting their allowance because of the economy.
/r/MensRights26/10/10 04:52 AM
3

the more recent feminist movement which began in the 1960's was founded upon anarchist practice. Do tell - under which anarchist practice do alimony payments go?
/r/MensRights26/10/10 04:20 AM
4

Shh. Adults talking here.
/r/MensRights26/10/10 04:06 AM
1

I can't answer that - it depends on your family, background and skills and the crap I might be able to deal with you might find intolerable, and vice - versa. Outside of that, I'd probably also use one of several indexes published on economic freedom and corruption as a guide. As for extradition, I'm not sure you can be extradited for owing money - you might want to consult a lawyer about that.
/r/MensRights25/10/10 12:15 AM
2

I thought there was merit in both suggestions. The latter mentioned moving to another country. A number of ones considered 'third world' are actually improving their standard of living while it is falling here in the US. Choose carefully. The other option to become Buddha isn't a bad one either. If desiring is making you miserable, then stop. It opens up a whole new world of alternatives for you. Become a monk and join a monastery. Let your baby's mama get her percentage in turnips or whatever e…
/r/MensRights24/10/10 06:41 PM
2

Don't blame you, really. Its like something out of "Brazil" or some other dysutopian story. The guy probably laughed too, after he realized how impossible the payment was to make. They pretty much backed him into a corner, and now he has to go out swinging.
/r/MensRights21/10/10 01:08 PM
7

Worst Case? The state sells his debt to a bank, who sells it to an investment house, who sells it to the Chinese. A death-wagon rolls up to his house later in the week to collect his kidneys, heart and skin. Best Case: He sells all his stuff and equipment, writes her one last big check, then leaves the country while listening to Bob Marley's "Exodus" on his ipod.
/r/MensRights21/10/10 12:42 PM
3

A lot of people probably think rape by deception is ok. Couldn't say. Well, this is marriage by deception. Is there a difference? Yes. A pretty big one. This isn't really marriage by deception. Its a fraud by way of marriage. A marriage by deception would have been if she pretended she was a long lost Russian princess and wasn't. The union itself is legitimate, she's just not who she says she is. She's living up to the spirit and letter of the marriage, its just that he's not going to be royalty…
/r/MensRights20/10/10 01:46 PM
1

It was definitely a "Cop-us interruptus" moment for the lovers. The solution here is just to have the ladies BYOB. At the very least, the frats won't get stuck with lawsuits or a fridge full of fruity shit drinks.
/r/MensRights19/10/10 02:47 PM
4

Outside of the often quoted 'women don't lie about rape' canard, and the 'women need a special recognized status in the legal system' demands, yes. It has nothing to do with feminism at all. Or at least earth feminism. Lest we all forget, some feminists aren't real feminists at all, but weird feminists from that mixed up Planet Bizarro. They look just like our equality seeking earth feminists, but spout off nonsense like "me am egalitarian who want special privileges" and "consensual sex is also…
/r/MensRights18/10/10 03:24 PM
7

This is why all proposals should be done with an elegantly designed fake. So that if she pulls this kind of shit you can bail out of the relationship with minimum loss. Also, you can see if she pulls the old 'appraise the ring to see how much he loves me' maneuver. "The ring's a fake!!!" "Does it matter?" You can see the strained smile on his face as he kind of realizes... well, you know that scene in "Indiana Jones and The Last Crusade" where the archaeologist takes a sip of a cup that promises…
/r/MensRights16/10/10 07:31 PM
1

i don't see why you felt you had to take pictures to prove your point. A picture is worth a thousand words. 'in this day and age' taking pictures of children unrelated to you in public is asking for trouble. Focusing on one select child, maybe. The pictures were not of a erotic nature from what he describes. And he took a photograph of a group of kids because that was the issue. In fact, if he was taking a photograph to document an issue, isn't that his right under the first amendment? Doesn't h…
/r/MensRights15/10/10 06:50 PM
1

A court sees three people when custody/support cases happen. The mom/dad and the kid. In every decision that I've seen, the court looks at what's best for the kids, and not the parents. Technically, shouldn't the courts be treating all the parties - mother, father and child - equally as citizens under the US Constitution? But because "think of the children!" takes precedence over everything else, it just won't happen. "Think of the children" is just an emotional clouding tactic to cover for what…
/r/MensRights15/10/10 02:50 PM
3

My only opinion on your work is that it should note marriage as a special case. It is automatically understood that when you bear children in marriage they are a product of the marriage and joint responsibility is automatic for the household. The father can withdraw involvement of the product of a union when a union is dissolved only if it can be proven the child is not his.
/r/MensRights15/10/10 02:44 PM
1

I wonder why when women go to church its the "you're a queen" style pandering, and for men its "straighten up" lectures. Do churches treat the sexes differently as a matter of belief, or marketing? Is there a women's version of "Promise Keepers"? Is there a male version of Tyler Perry style 'good woman - evil man' style dramas?
/r/MensRights15/10/10 02:31 PM
2

I think he means authoritarian when he says conservative. Its going way beyond the usual conservative/liberal duality bullshit. Its about school administrators meeting whatever 'challenge' they face with bans. Kids reading 'funny' books? Ban'em. Trading rubber bands? Ban'em. High-fives in the hallway? Ban'em. Tough work, but they got to show some kind of effort for that six figure salary. Kind of funny how the long-haired furry freak brothers kids of the 60's and 70's grew up and be genuine stic…
/r/MensRights15/10/10 03:22 AM
2

Actually Beowulf decides to go fight the dragon because he's old and he wants to go out with a bang. The flame-dragon had burned the fortress of the people. The war-king studied revenge. That is all you need to know about his motives. The beast was dangerous, and Beowulf is a fighter with a history of taking the battle to the enemy. Fighting for glory's sake and treasure is a bit out of his written character. and actually dies for the treasure, and they don't leave the treasure they kill the dra…
/r/MensRights14/10/10 02:13 AM
0

Well, since you put it that way, I think Imelda Marcos's story is long overdue - the heroic epic of one heroic woman bravely amassing a huuuuuge collection of heroic shoes. Compare this to Beowulf. That's one guy getting half-drowned by man-eaters and burned alive by a dragon - and for what? The welfare of his tiny tribe, who I might add - did not have a single pair of Prada between them. In fact, Beowulf spurns the treasure. Treasure that could have bought them all knock-off Ugg boots, but he l…
/r/MensRights13/10/10 04:22 PM
5

I brought this up in that thread, but I've got to ask here - if women cheat so often on guys, why haven't men been able to take advantage of "Alienation of Affection" lawsuits?
/r/MensRights12/10/10 01:50 PM
2

Not really. In many ways they are both slave moralities in that they are focused on negative liberty - freedom from restraint - as opposed to a master morality which is concerned with fulfilling one's potential, which is a more positive liberty model. In some ways its more a question of who is using who - is your self-described feminist using this political structure to further her own ends, or is she constrained by the group and the baggage of the lesser members of the movement? A corporation i…
/r/MensRights11/10/10 12:51 AM
2

I also think advocating for the rights of men is particularly difficult because of this. If you're advocating for women's rights, you're most likely to get lumped into a "victim" category which is relatively socially acceptable these days. If you advocate for men's rights, you can get lumped into a "evil woman-hating misogynist" category, which is much more damaging. Let me just throw this idea out for review - good or ill. People will always scoff at the term 'men's rights' and guys who voice t…
/r/MensRights07/10/10 09:44 PM
1

Yes. That would be abuse. Thanks for sharing that family story.
/r/MensRights07/10/10 05:40 PM
1

Well, odds are your grandfather grew up in the Great Depression. Was he hoarding money because of this experience and expected his wife to be as frugal as he was, or was he spending the money on himself and toys? In other words, was he abusing finances for his own ego, or because he was excessively fearful about the future and didn't want his family to suffer?
/r/MensRights07/10/10 04:55 PM
0

Interesting. And a partner that withholds sex until they get a new car or living room suite - is this abuse too?
/r/MensRights07/10/10 04:45 PM
10

Unless he had his hand in her pants or something like that, I'll have to side with him. Pull this if you want your chute to deploy. Giggity giggity giggity!
/r/MensRights06/10/10 05:30 PM
1

Well, I think the most important question is what were you hoping to get out of a woman studies class? Self knowledge? History? Try to get a good handle on what you wanted to get out of the class and see if it is met by the course outline and readings. If its not a match, then switch instructors or drop the class. It might be possible for you to pursue your interests with an independent study under another instructor, or using a book on the subject that you think best suits your needs. Best of l…
/r/MensRights30/09/10 01:42 PM
1

Good point - but at least Odysseus came back to a home. Penelope held down the fort - alone - as opposed to changing the locks. She too was a hero of the story.
/r/MensRights29/09/10 02:34 PM
5

Maybe he can have his own show with Sylvester Stallone called "Been there, done that".
/r/MensRights29/09/10 01:34 PM
3

Let's see... gets out 'Overused cliches MR critics use' bingo card Got a 'whazza problem', a questionable statistic, a "you're imagining things", one "it's your fault", and a "privilidged (sic) white dudes" (white male privilege) that segues into a 'suck it up' ....and BINGO!
/r/MensRights29/09/10 03:30 AM
1

Really. The vet finishes an eight or more hour plane flight - coach - and finds out he is homeless. That's a real shit move. Its like Homer's "The Odyssey" gone tragically wrong.
/r/MensRights29/09/10 03:03 AM
1

I liked this comment: It would be interesting to pinpoint when the technological shift occurred ... much like the cotton gin is usually credited with making slavery obsolete, it would be neat to identify a specific turning point for marriage going from necessary to mere tradition. I'd argue that the shift occurred with corporate globalism. If you can move large numbers of immigrants around, who needs to raise kids? Its cheaper to just import your talent, or move the job where the talent is if yo…
/r/MensRights29/09/10 12:02 AM
3

How could that second guy feel at all at ease in a relationship with that woman? He was either stupid, insane or a real dead-beat moocher.
/r/MensRights28/09/10 10:59 PM
-1

Its the usual 'empower women because men suck' argument. Educating children is a secondary concern. The main goal as you highlighted, is making female 'agents of change' for the nations populated with 'little brown ones' who need our 'help'. Edit: Oh dear - look at that number of downmods. And yet... not a single post explaining how what I said differs with their stated mission. Huh.
/r/MensRights27/09/10 02:30 PM
1

"You take out the testosterone and these events are kinder, cleaner, gentler and sweeter," says Robert Pozo, who runs a group of women's races from a website called Run Like a Diva. Which makes it even more awesome when you crash their little runs dressed as characters from the "Road Warrior" If they want to put a tiara on Lord Humongeous, more power to em.
/r/MensRights23/09/10 08:46 PM
1

Why can't they just do the 'relax baybee' backrub bit like everyone else?
/r/MensRights23/09/10 08:34 PM
1

Is it her or Disney Channel? Cause everything on Disney Channel puts me in a punchy mood.
/r/MensRights23/09/10 08:30 PM
3

This is what you do. Go to the council and point out that this is kind of discriminatory - everyone pays for the pool regardless, and should be given equal access. But - if they have to have a special women's only time then the women should have to pay a door charge. This door charge should go to funding a private men's club for the guys to go to when they can't use the pool. They get the women's only pool time, guys get a private club to relax in, and the bureaucrats get to take money from one …
/r/MensRights23/09/10 02:57 PM
1

That's a good point - are these 'women-only' spots during prime times when everyone wants to use a pool, or the off-hours? Are a number of people being inconvenienced for the sake of a few bigoted recluses? Give them the scrap hours where the pool is underutilized I say. If done right, nobody will even care.
/r/MensRights23/09/10 02:18 PM
4

Or even worse - not being "leered" at.
/r/MensRights23/09/10 02:08 PM
1

Probably is. Where's Chris Hansen when you need him?
/r/MensRights22/09/10 03:01 PM
2

Good point. Perhaps someone should write a counter-article: "Society paying price for Twilight"
/r/MensRights21/09/10 07:34 PM
3

Sounds like a Disney style fairy tale. In the Grimm version he marries her after all his buds warn him, and she ends up being a witch. Her wedding gift is a spell that turns him into a wild man with long hair and iron skin and he is then thrown into a lake.
/r/MensRights21/09/10 03:52 PM
1

I realise this is being posted into a thread within MensRights and I'll receive endless downvotes You deserve downvotes for that line alone. When you decide to put your dick into a vagina, you need to be prepared for the possibility of a baby. If you don't want said progeny or perhaps any negative consequences of a child, then don't place your dick into a vagina or anything else capable of reproduction. The man makes one decision: sex or not. The woman makes three decisions: sex or not, carry ba…
/r/MensRights19/09/10 11:46 AM
133

Maybe he was moonwalking behind her, so he could follow her but still claim he was 'walking in the opposite direction'. The suspect in question could have been a smooth criminal. If the female's name was 'Annie' then I really don't blame her for being a bit paranoid - especially after that last incident.
/r/MensRights17/09/10 01:44 PM
31

Fine. Keep him responsible for child support. But it would probably be in everyone's best interests if the child was removed from the woman's home. And then the ex needs to be stripped of her assets and receive some jail time for fraud.
/r/MensRights16/09/10 05:19 PM
-3

Yes - but that document was written by men who didn't have to worry about rape! Oh, if only NOW had access to a time machine so they could storm the first Constitutional Convention and alert them to the dangers of testosterone poisoning and "deadbeat dads". edit: LOL. Burning karma and loving it.
/r/MensRights14/09/10 07:45 PM
19

How many innocents will suffer at the hands of one of those 10 free guilty men. Ten guilty men cannot do as much damage as a government with the ability to take freedom capriciously in pursuit of upholding the law. My guess is that Mr. Blackstone was making a soundbite and he didn't actually do any numerical work to get that 10:1 ratio. Is a 100:1 ok? Is a 1000:1 ok? of course there's a limit, and there should be an accurate way of estimating it. You would think. A number of governments have suf…
/r/MensRights14/09/10 07:40 PM
10

As for whether a man should be responsible for a child he doesn't want where the mother has refused to have an abortion, I'm not so sure. I think a man's ultimate responsibility, in this scenario, is to the child. But isn't the woman's ultimate responsibility, in this scenario, also to the child? You seem to be saying that the needs of the child outweigh the needs of the father. But you also seem to be implying that the needs of the mother (to have a baby) outweigh the needs of the child (to hav…
/r/MensRights11/09/10 01:12 PM
5

Unless the feminists in the UN go through with a plan for a "fugitive man act" that allows bounty hunters to track and return men to their owners regardless of national boundaries.
/r/MensRights11/09/10 12:55 PM
3

I'm game. If "chip rape" makes it into the Oxford English Dictionary, my life will be complete.
/r/MensRights09/09/10 02:38 PM
30

"Personal boundaries have been violated?" Heck, I feel the same way about people double-dipping snacks in the fondue at parties, but I don't call it chip rape.
/r/MensRights09/09/10 03:01 AM
4

Now that's what I call an extreme sport. Don't want to be a killjoy, but the family courts are filled with guys who thought, "I'm smart, it won't happen to me" and lamenting "Why didn't I do something less risky for thrills, like kick a wild grizzly in the nuts?"
/r/MensRights09/09/10 02:23 AM
1

Everyone is so quick to jump on the idea of a guy abusing his girlfriend. Been there, done that. A girlfriend of mine once fell going down the stairs. Some goofball mangina heard her cry and asked her if I pushed her down the stairs. Why, I have no idea - I wasn't in the state, much less the stairwell. She said she found the concept so out of character that she actually laughed him off. Yes, people love reading a story into incidents. P.S. I am not Black or Mexican. But, my Grandfather (the one …
/r/MensRights09/09/10 02:02 AM
11

I'd prefer the local municipalities offer a different set of self-defense classes for young men: *verbal judo & self-defense *political history of human sexuality *predatory females - observation and avoidance techniques
/r/MensRights08/09/10 07:21 PM
4

Stepping back and recording everything with a phone's camera - another way the friend could have helped.
/r/MensRights08/09/10 05:33 PM
5

Good job. In hindsight, should have gone straight to the bartender when they assaulted you by slapping the drink out of your hand. Tell him that two drunk women are harassing you and ask him to call them a cab.
/r/MensRights08/09/10 02:33 PM
2

Perhaps we should follow the dating and courtship methods used before the 20th century. They were used to protect a lady's virtue against predatory men. Now we can use them to protect a lad from predatory women. Get references on the women you are interested in. Shy away from relationships with unfamiliar women unless you have had a proper introduction. Have a chaperone accompany you on dates until you feel comfortable enough about her intentions. Yeah, this is kind of tongue in cheek, but I wou…
/r/MensRights25/08/10 05:12 PM
17

He said Ruggiero's folly came because claims in criminal court had to be backed up -- unlike in family court where she made repeated claims about ex-husband's behavior. "Unfortunately for her, we're not in family court anymore," Blanchard said. How does family court get away with this?
/r/MensRights25/08/10 01:47 AM
0

Pick any combination of the reasons mentioned below: Laziness Ignorance Insanity
/r/MensRights19/08/10 07:46 PM
0

I have to say, this post really offends me. 1 - This has nothing to do with Men's rights. Irrelevant to the point of trolling. The product of maliciousness, ignorance or madness? I really can't decide. 2 - If I have to put the effort into making a chocolate cake, I'm going to do it correctly - not just toss together some slipshod mess in a microwave. Its a wasteful toss of the dice for the lazy, self-indulgent consumer. The recipe reflects everything that is wrong with America right now - the ce…
/r/MensRights19/08/10 04:35 PM
4

Her paycheck is dependent on ignoring it. If Ms. O'Neill was president of BP instead of NOW, we would have heard about how violent the oceans are, how much damage they inflict on helpless oil rigs and the accident can be seen as a form of 'battered spouse syndrome'.
/r/MensRights17/08/10 02:56 PM
0

Your roommate's reasoning is somewhat followable, but its based on bad laws made with good intentions. The solution to a law that forces slavery onto one person due to another's choices isn't another law that enslaves both people - the solution is the modification or removal of the initial bad law.
/r/MensRights15/08/10 04:11 PM
1

The lights sequence just don't corroborate her story. Get a lawyer then. You have an open and shut libel case to reimburse you for your expenses I would think.
/r/MensRights06/08/10 04:29 AM
1

But that would count as insurance fraud if they paid out based on false evidence, wouldn't it?
/r/MensRights06/08/10 04:27 AM
1

Why should my tax dollars pay for irresponsible people to have children? Why should my tax dollars pay to allow them to be irresponsible in the first place? The state is going to be doing the enforcing, and has varying types of force it can apply to coerce people, it has a responsibility for making sure it is accurate about who is billed. That's only fair. I agree that responsibility should be rewarded as opposed to irresponsibility. And I agree that current law and medical technology has enable…
/r/MensRights03/08/10 02:11 PM
1

Why shouldn't it cost the government? They are the ones using force and threats if a man can't make child support payments. They are the ones who are running the racket of getting money from the feds to match child support payments. They should in fact be paying - not the father.
/r/MensRights03/08/10 11:30 AM
2

In a number of cases the lack of paternity can be determined just by comparing the blood types of the father, mother and child from what I understand. I've been told that even in cases where it is pretty obvious that the child isn't the fathers the doctors will usually hide that fact from the man - the argument being that doctors see it as following their rule of 'first do no harm'. Before anyone can expect hospitals to offer fathers paternity tests, I think steps should be taken to make doctors…
/r/MensRights03/08/10 04:49 AM
7

Keep in mind, when she says "anything" she doesn't mean "keeping my kids inside" or "hiring a bodyguard" or even "freezing my kids in carbonite and storing them in a crimelord's throne room" she means "that doesn't inconvenience me." Plus, reporters like to get quotes from the extremes to jazz up an article. He probably went through several reasonable responses till he hit the motherlode of bat-crazy.
/r/MensRights02/08/10 08:12 PM
4

But the court doesn't care whether Shirley was a good or bad mother. Neither does her lawyer, Donald McLeod of Victoria, who picked up the case through Pro Bono BC and has never met his client, though they have talked by phone. "My interest, quite frankly, is to see that someone is treated right, and that's all I care about." "Mr. McLeod, approach the bench." "Since you are so determined to see that the plaintiff is treated right, the court can't help but award Mrs. Anderson the $500 a month she…
/r/MensRights29/07/10 05:22 PM
7

One of the points of child support is that he who fathers a child should be financially responsible for it. In Harper's case, the State of Michigan has it exactly backwards. No. The point of child support is to assist the State in reducing the expenses for orphans and poor, unwed mothers. That's why they don't give a blip who gets the bill, just as long as it isn't them. I can only imagine what would happen if there was an immaculate conception. They'd probably hit God up for an astronomical amo…
/r/MensRights29/07/10 05:02 PM
3

We're not crying - just practicing squeezing water out of the air with just our eyelids. Its a trick covered on "Man vs Wild" for desert survival.
/r/MensRights21/07/10 01:35 AM
4

Well, if this was a buddy telling you this, what would your advise be to him? Odds are it would be 'leave, now'. I'd go with that instinct rather than rationalize staying. I'd also advise you to start keeping a journal regardless of what you do. It might be of some use in the future. Also, be sure to take advantage of the outstanding domestic abuse support that your local government provides. Be sure to explore the many options and services that your community provides. Be sure to take good note…
/r/MensRights14/07/10 06:09 PM
8

In the meantime they will start hyping up the lawsuit and advertising their "Twilight Special" flights for cougars.
/r/MensRights13/07/10 09:25 PM
1

No brainer. Make a law that says that government 'family support' / child welfare services have to keep track of the sanitary conditions of the homes that receive child support. This is justified because it is actually for the child's benefit. That's what they should be doing, right? In fact, it should be made mandatory by the federal government since the feds provide matching funds for child support payments. This would normally cost money to local governments, but having forms available for th…
/r/MensRights09/07/10 12:21 PM
1

The article also makes note that lack of compensation for household specialization seemed to push some women voters into voting for big government. In other words, alimony isn't compensating stay-at-homes for their efforts and decisions. Not the most popular thing to say in this subreddit. But if the paper is correct, maybe alimony accuracy should be looked into. How do you measure such a contribution fairly?
/r/MensRights01/07/10 05:03 PM
12

Walking away is the easy thing to do. Pressing charges would have been more work, but better for everyone. Society would have one less violent sociopath on the streets, and the femi-nut would have gotten psychological help.
/r/MensRights30/06/10 12:14 AM
1

Back then, being big meant the woman was 'high maintenance'.
/r/MensRights27/06/10 05:30 PM
6

That's why some airlines don't have men sit next to children - you can catch the evil testosterone merely by sharing an arm rest.
/r/MensRights27/06/10 05:29 PM
7

But he couldn't 'make them'. Making unrealistic, obtuse demands like "Make them" won't change that fact. Jailing him does not correct the situation - it in fact puts him further behind the eight-ball. Its amazing how many are blind to the failures of the machine. Its sad how many are unsympathetic until they themselves get caught in the gears.
/r/MensRights22/06/10 09:10 PM
3

I'm hesitant to say it doesn't belong in MensRights without hearing what sort of conversation the poster was hoping to generate.
/r/MensRights20/06/10 11:06 PM
1

Good luck with that. From what I've been told, they are the ones that get weeded out.
/r/MensRights19/06/10 09:54 PM
3

I'd say that any society that thinks that fathers are irrelevant and men are dangerous is on its way to irrelevancy.
/r/MensRights19/06/10 09:44 PM
-1

The problem is that most of the Family Services departments in states have been wormed through with militant feminists who abuse the powers of the state. Pushing their antimale orthodoxy takes precedence to upholding the law. And if the result of their activities are fewer responsible fathers, then good - that just reinforces their beliefs and justifies their actions.
/r/MensRights17/06/10 05:55 PM
17

Usually the reason given in courts I have been told is that it is "not in the child's best interests". The reason is that documenting how the money is spent allows for opportunities for the source to reduce the payments by proving that funds aren't being spent properly through ignorance or fraud. Since the state recieves matching funds from the federal government that means their coffers are being directly affected. Therefore, it is in their interests not to have child support payments documente…
/r/MensRights17/06/10 02:59 PM
6

It chews up a lot of time. Not as much time as it takes to make the money. That I can assure you. Even less time with electronic payments and the online services banks offer. The person getting child support could just throw in a portion of rent + assumption of food & clothing and that could be over & above the amount contributed. Irrelevant. We are talking about why the person receiving funds that are supposed to be spent on dependents not documenting how the money is spent. You have already lo…
/r/MensRights17/06/10 02:50 PM
3

Ah, but we are going under the assumption that the welfare of the children is the primary concern. We all know that the woman's right to be a mother is first, then the welfare of the children and finally the father's concerns - unless of course the father puts the keys to a shiny red Ferrari in the Judge's tip jar. shakes tip jar Final verdict: The sociopath will be given a firm slap on the wrist and warned be more subtle in her abuse, or at least make sure it is performed in such a manner that …
/r/MensRights07/06/10 11:04 PM
3

I think the judge was fairly lenient with her. What this selfish woman was doing could be argued as child abuse, libel and perverting the course of justice. The question that should be asked is why the courts are letting children continue to live with their abuser.
/r/MensRights07/06/10 09:57 PM
1

The fact that you have to resort to the personal attack says all that needs to be said gp. My personal details aren't relevant here - it wouldn't be adding to the conversation and would be rightfully downmodded. If you are really, interested, you could private message me I suppose. No guarantees you'd like the answer, much less get one. I think a better argument would have been to point to countries where there is no/little child support and use that as a basis for defending the status quo. It s…
/r/MensRights28/05/10 02:51 PM
0

I'll just repeat the words I started this conversation with: "...women bear an unequal part in the reproductive process, so they should have unequal (privileged) rights when it comes to reproductive choice." And those unequal reproductive rights are limited to the volume of her form. Beyond that and we get into the realm of entitlement and force trumping individual rights.
/r/MensRights28/05/10 02:55 AM
-1

So why should she be allowed to keep a child if she can't afford it? Isn't the "its about kids" plea more of a smoke screen to cloud the fact that feminists are silently claiming that women have the right to have a baby and be mothers? How is this not a form of entitlement? Does this not encourage bad decisions?
/r/MensRights28/05/10 02:42 AM
1

Selfishness masquerading as victim advocacy. Modern feminism is the bastard child of the sins of Envy and Wrath wearing a wig and a strap-on.
/r/MensRights12/05/10 12:19 PM
1

Nothing - so long as you don't do it through the state supported "Clothesline Project". Its for empowering the victims of violence, spousal assault, rape, incest, sexual orientation attacks or political violence - but only if you are a woman. Because if you are a man, you aren't a real victim, I suppose. Or your pain is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights12/05/10 12:04 PM
1

Once the federal government got into the wealth-redistribution-social engineering-business what could have been the outcome but corruption and slavery?
/r/MensRights08/05/10 03:23 AM
2

Some black Americans. Oddly enough, the ones I know that shout the loudest for reparations of some sort are usually the biggest sociopaths. Manipulative bible thumpers like Jessie Jackson or Rev. Sharpton.
/r/MensRights27/04/10 01:25 PM
2

This sounds like the sort of suit you would see in the sci-fi story Dune where people can access ancestor memories and such. Still, maybe she has a point. Perhaps she should specifically state the past incident and specific participants she has in mind. I'd also like to hear how she believes she has a valid claim to this past injury, and how it has damaged her specifically.
/r/MensRights25/04/10 01:53 AM
0

If it is such an easy decision then don't get offended you little git. Man up and don't make any bitchy apologies.
/r/MensRights24/04/10 01:59 PM
10

The man was clearly unstable. He thought for sure that marshal law was eminent. He converted his third floor into an illegal firing range! And had not harmed, nor intended to harm a soul.
/r/MensRights23/04/10 10:18 PM
-5

That's not automatically a bad thing - what if the father was unstable/dangerous/etc? More importantly, why shouldn't the custodial parent extract economic rent for access to the child? I'm pretty sure a dying child can command premium prices. Who dares deny a grieving mother a little pocket money?
/r/MensRights16/04/10 05:09 PM
7

I find bigots usually have a very odd sense of humor, though I don't really know why. Probably a world view tainted by a combination of ignorance and irrational fear. Derogatory humor acts as a release valve maybe. Still, fraud in science and scholarship isn't really a very funny subject, is it? I'm sure there are much more constructive things she could be doing that making up names for sock-puppet scholars. It indicates to me that they aren't listening - they continue to stay in their little ca…
/r/MensRights11/04/10 11:42 AM
2

So it seems temporary restraining orders should be unconstitutional without a hearing of some sort or criminal history to back it up.
/r/MensRights10/04/10 03:42 PM
12

You actually watched 30 minutes of The View? Was this part of some sort of sadistic rites of passage ceremony? Couldn't you have gotten off with a mere branding or a sundance ceremony?
/r/MensRights08/03/10 06:23 PM
9

Well, let's see what mister wikipedia says about duress: In order for duress to qualify as a defense, four requirements must be met:[1] Threat must be of serious bodily harm or death Harm threatened must be greater than the harm caused by the crime Threat must be immediate and inescapable The defendant must have become involved in the situation through no fault of his or her own Even if we assume #1,#2 & #4 were true, there's no way that #3 was met. Not with five years of her escaping to a job a…
/r/MensRights08/03/10 04:29 AM
5

Tell her her unsympathetic aloof attitude is similar to Marie Antoinette before the French Revolution with a key difference - at least the queen had ignorance as an excuse. Remind her that men pushed into hopeless situations tend to do extraordinary things.
/r/MensRights07/03/10 08:24 PM
7

And was her boyfriend with her everywhere for an entire five year period so she couldn't call the police? She had a number of options at her disposal. The safest and easiest one was calling the police. If she didn't, it certainly wasn't because of a lack of opportunity or training.
/r/MensRights05/03/10 02:39 PM
16

If we only had a database to keep track of women like that, Mr Rankin would be alive today.
/r/MensRights04/03/10 06:32 AM
4

National Declaration for Domestic Violence.
/r/MensRights04/03/10 06:21 AM
4

Problem with that is soon after she disappears past the event horizon a white hole would open up. Moments later she would come hurtling out with a note attached: "Please quit dumping your trash in our dimension".
/r/MensRights02/03/10 02:27 PM
2

Hurh. So he's enough of a pedophile concern that they delete his photos, but taking the kid home is an ok? Even Barney Fife would be scratchin his head on that one..
/r/MensRights28/02/10 03:37 PM
1

Maybe...maybe. Or perhaps it was really posted by a female supremacist that wanted to sap the strength of the MRA movement by showing that the system is fair, pays attention to fathers and puts the children first. Whatever man. So I guess that would make it.. white-black propaganda..or is that white-black-white propaganda? False flag rock-in-a-box propaganda? Kind of confusing and complicated to scry motive if you distrust the author. Just simpler to say you believe it, or you don't. And I'll pa…
/r/MensRights28/02/10 03:20 PM
2

Well, yeah. Who would want to see a bridezilla getting fitted for a collar after screeching about "Today is MY Day" at a wedding? (looks about, then slowly raises his hand)
/r/MensRights26/02/10 02:12 PM
4

In a fashion. Guys flying Nippon Airlines will have to make do with a mason jar and a bag over their heads.
/r/MensRights25/02/10 08:43 PM
2

...as opposed to politicians who are abusive until they are out of work.
/r/MensRights24/02/10 04:26 AM
1

Oddly enough, ethnic cleansing genocide is so 20th century. If the Israelis truly were interested in wiping the Palestinians from the area they would pass laws that would tax men at a higher rate, jail their men in any domestic disputes regardless of the instigator, force their boys to take ADD drugs and have divorce laws designed to transfer as much wealth from the men as possible for the purpose of making them debt slaves. Oh...wait a minute....
/r/MensRights24/02/10 04:22 AM
1

Good point. After all, here in the west both men and women are given a day with twenty-four hours in which to earn their wages. I can only assume that because of poverty, overcrowding and the historical patriarchy women in poor third world research and manufacturing hubs like India have been given a much smaller number of hours in a day - and substandard ones at that. Pardon my cynicism, but seriously. Was this what sufferage was to enable - an opportunity for Pauline to vote herself a slice of …
/r/MensRights23/02/10 05:04 AM
2

Exactly. The whole argument is based on the premise that the child's best interests trumps the father's best interests. I argue that is unconstitutional. But the real focus needs to be put on "following the money." Figuring out how bad judges and tainted decisions are rewarded by the system.
/r/MensRights20/02/10 01:05 PM
1

*The Franklin Prophecy *Protocols of the Elders of Zion *A Racial Program for the 20th Century Its funny how the MRA movement is compared to racist/extremist organizations when we see that a number of feminists use the same tactics that they use in distributing false papers and political forgeries. "Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities."
/r/MensRights14/02/10 01:13 PM
3

A compelling idea. But we live in a world that tends to reward people who can suppress their empathy, sadly.
/r/MensRights13/02/10 04:38 AM
1

Push the government to mandate prearranged marriages at six. That should generate plenty of divorces.
/r/MensRights13/02/10 04:29 AM
10

Clever. Nice way to extend your fifteen minutes of fame and draw the spotlight to yourself as "victim". Certainly a lot smarter than Balloon Boy's dad. She plays her cards right and she should get a couple of appearances on daytime talk shows and her own movie on Oxygen. Disclaimer: Ladies of ill-repute who live in the Middle East. Please. Do not try this in your local regions. This only works in decadent, first world countries.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 10:06 PM
2

Or see the writing on the wall and have decided to be a bit proactive.
/r/MensRights11/02/10 09:51 PM
2

This isn't real complicated. Are we going to respect everyone's freedom to choose to be a parent or not? If the nation-state can force men to be parents, then why not women?
/r/MensRights10/02/10 08:06 PM
4

Still beating this drum of a father having the right to say screw you to his children? Do you realize how ridiculous it makes you look? I suppose that's one way to emotionally frame the issue. Another way is to ask why should the man be responsible for a decision that is completely up to the woman? Should the state be enforcing these relationships? Is the money truly being spent for the welfare of the children? A number of these issues pretty much deal with questions of fatherhood - is a father'…
/r/MensRights10/02/10 05:13 PM
7

“Participants this week were guardedly optimistic (at best!) about the potential for significantly disrupting and transforming gender relations following natural disasters.” Somehow, I am somewhat bothered by 'charity' that comes with such strings. People are already in a pretty stressful situation. I'm not sure that putting them through more stress of 'change to our liking or you won't eat/stay clean/find shelter' is helping for the long term. “As I began a project rebuilding houses for familie…
/r/MensRights10/02/10 12:13 PM
16

There's always an element of sloth to bigotry. Rather than seriously look into our grievances, it saves a whole lot of energy and time just to slap an "EVIL" label on people you disagree with.
/r/MensRights08/02/10 10:21 PM
30

As I can recall at the last meeting in the Legion of Doom HQ, the plan the boys came up with was narrowed down to.. Shut down all the women's shelters. ??? Profit. Hadn't quite narrowed down the second step yet. Perhaps it should be mustache twirling, while kicking a puppy and clubbing a baby seal. Sigh. Time for dinner. Unicorn burgers, again.
/r/MensRights08/02/10 10:00 PM
0

Here's a better way to motivate some spouses: Make it a competition.
/r/MensRights07/02/10 11:56 PM
4

You might want to call the cops now. Mrs Cynwrig swears playing this whenever the Saints make a sack is abuse.
/r/MensRights07/02/10 11:47 PM
1

Ah. Thanks for the clarification. Wasn't sure if you were supporting/opposing unwed mothers having sole power to determine a child's adoption status, or just slapping fathers - which was way out of character for you.
/r/MensRights07/02/10 02:39 PM
7

But on the bright side, the State of Utah has solidified the tax revenue stream from selling babies. Ka-Ching!
/r/MensRights06/02/10 08:59 PM
1

How's that?
/r/MensRights06/02/10 08:55 PM
4

8:19 "We kill [girls] as embryos." - is she sneaking in an antiabortion argument? Some people in Asian cultures do. Not sure where this 'we' comes from - outside of being dishonest. Some hillbillies in New Guinea eat their dead relatives. Are we guilty of that as well?
/r/MensRights04/02/10 03:26 PM
-2

This. Besides, there's plenty-o-yuks in the MRA movement, you betcha. Genital mutilation, false rape accusations, principal aggressor arrests, fraud, abuse - laughs galore as long as you frame it right and there's a laugh track to set the mood. Edit: Awww. What's with the downmods? Weren't we all in agreement on how funny other people's discomfort is? It would seem today's 'feminists' would agree with this paraphrase of Mel Brooks - "A woman's cut finger is a tragedy, a man falling in an open ma…
/r/MensRights04/02/10 03:12 PM
3

Well, there you go - Obama's still angry wrt his dad. Somebody needs to sign up to be his "Big Brother". Do stuff like take him to a baseball game, teach him to stand up for himself in Congress, to be a man of honor and do what he says, never start a fight, but always finish it (Afghanistan, I'm lookin at you) and show him how not to be intimidated by tomboy girls like that Clinton lady.
/r/MensRights02/02/10 03:50 PM
2

So if being seen as a 'man of honor' is so important, why are our leaders so lacking in this characteristic? Why do we fall time and time again to jackals disguised as lions?
/r/MensRights01/02/10 03:02 PM
8

Then Ann Coulter devoted her December 9 column to the case, calling it the "second-most notorious witch trial in Massachusetts history" and charging Coakley had "kept a clearly innocent man in prison in order to advance her political career." Never thought I'd be saying this - Good for Ann Coulter. Boo on Coakley for attempting to build a political career by destroying innocent lives. Prosecuting innocent men for crimes they didn't commit is no longer the sure-fire formula to electoral success i…
/r/MensRights01/02/10 02:51 PM
7

Gay men in the men's rights movement? At the very least, they bring a different viewpoint. In some cases I suspect that they will take the lead role in solving some problems. As for the role of gay men in feminism? Couldn't say.
/r/MensRights28/01/10 05:36 PM
1

Sigh. There's nothing sadder than someone laughing at their own bad joke.
/r/MensRights27/01/10 03:05 PM
2

Understood. It just that it can get really, really tiring to have to have to worry on top of other things whether you are somebody's bête noire or not, and make special efforts to deal with these dilemmas.
/r/MensRights26/01/10 05:14 PM
2

Taxation without representation?
/r/MensRights24/01/10 02:30 PM
6

Or the Star Wars Kid. She thought nobody was looking while she indulged herself in a stupid fantasy. And of course as we all know, on the internet somebody is always looking.
/r/MensRights23/01/10 06:54 PM
11

Stay classy v.primate, stay classy.
/r/MensRights23/01/10 06:10 PM
2

And about bureaucrats dutifully doing their jobs regardless of appropriateness, justice or fairness. Just sticking the bill to whoever has the money and can't protect themselves.
/r/MensRights23/01/10 06:06 PM
2

It is only a matter of time before child services notes that computer programs can fork child processes, then they'll want a cut of that action too.
/r/MensRights23/01/10 05:26 PM
7

Yes, she merely wanted to scare him by poking him a few times with the kitchen knife. How was she to know he would try to get the drop on her with a semi-automatic baby?
/r/MensRights22/01/10 05:41 PM
11

And I'm sure the jail sentence and loss of income due to having a prison record is doing wonders for Dad's ability to make those payments. Wonder how much longer before they start requiring fathers to sell their internal organs to make payments. Kidneys should be worth a year or two. Flay the skin of his back and it will grow back, much like a stone crab regrows a claw after a year or so, and it brings in good cash for burn victims and as novelty lampshades. It would be a small step for Child Se…
/r/MensRights22/01/10 04:04 PM
2

Ad-hominem aside, it makes a valid point of how feminism's recent efforts have been less about equality and freedom and more with securing a comfortable niche for itself in an increasingly authoritarian state apparatus. They have become nothing more than a high heel stepping on a human (male, with some luck) face, forever.
/r/MensRights21/01/10 03:39 PM
1

A country that is a collection of broken families and fearful serfs is much more easier to control than one filled with self-reliant communities, strong families and free men.
/r/MensRights21/01/10 03:24 PM
2

Unlike men where any frown is rewarded with calls to law enforcement, there are few repercussions for women getting angry and acting up, let alone attractive women. "Oooh, she's so hot when she's psychotic and armed."
/r/MensRights21/01/10 02:48 PM
18

For that piece to be more self indulgent it would have to be printed on a vibrator.
/r/MensRights19/01/10 02:20 AM
4

snorts coffee out of nose What? Dishonesty = rape? Oh no. Please Ms. Feminist, please don't open that door! Please don't throw us into that briar patch. Our worst nightmare! No! Don't do it! Don't call your legislators right now to make it so that anyone being deceptive wrt sex is a rapist! Its too horrible a fate for our wicked Men's rights agenda to fathom! Nooo!!!!
/r/MensRights18/01/10 05:05 PM
7

Buying drinks for strangers has always been a sucker move. Even Richard Feynman covered that topic in his books. I thought Feminism would have resulted in women feeling more relaxed and empowered to buy the drinks. Guess that economics trumps you-go-girl feminism.
/r/MensRights17/01/10 04:43 PM
6

Status seeking - pissing on your underlings. Risk taking - pissing on the king.
/r/MensRights14/01/10 05:13 PM
3

That's the thing. Everyone can understand the concept if she had spiked his drinks with rat poison regardless of if it was a lethal dose or not. Electricity - less so. Its a bit more exotic.
/r/MensRights13/01/10 04:01 PM
4

Get this issue and its awareness out to the first-line responders. They probably have training for handling domestic situations. Does this training include how to handle ambiguous situations that aren't as easy to understand instantly? Create a checklist of things men can do to to avoid these situations. Make sure you are in a public place. Carry a small voice recorder. Thank god for cell phones that can record videos and take pictures.
/r/MensRights12/01/10 03:24 PM
0

Google or Wikipedia Bioluminescence. And yes, sometimes it is used for signaling for finding mates. Still, I'm downmodding you for posting off-topic - not Men's Rights related. :(... Sorry! Consider reposting to the science subreddit.
/r/MensRights12/01/10 02:42 PM
1

If a man were to stare at me, another man, continuing after I had indicated with my own gaze and body language that his behavior was uninvited, I know how I would respond. My heart would already be beating faster, adrenaline starting to trickle out, by the time I went over to talk to him. It's a base impulse to be sure. To answer with aggression a man who may or may not be challenging me with his eyes, correct me if I'm wrong, but I think this is something like what every man feels. If the situa…
/r/MensRights11/01/10 07:36 PM
1

Luckily, Islam's got you covered wrt that problem. Ho! I made a punny!
/r/MensRights11/01/10 07:22 PM
2

Its always been a fancy of mine to rent space at a wedding show and have a booth where stories like the one above are shared with grooms. Men only, of course. With a title like "Pleasing your Princess" to throw off exploiters.
/r/MensRights11/01/10 05:53 PM
5

Sigh. Its a sad world when trust, discipline and chastity are criticized and self-indulgence, betrayal and risk are applauded. The Douche
/r/MensRights08/01/10 04:34 PM
3

Is there a list of states that force divorced parents to pay for their adult child's education? Just want to know where not to move to for future reference. I figure if they passed a law that screwed up, they are too incompetent to be trusted to other matters.
/r/MensRights08/01/10 02:48 PM
8

They'll make some princess a very satisfied slave owner.
/r/MensRights07/01/10 06:34 PM
1

I don't think he had much choice in the matter. Anything he could have done to defend himself would have been seen as 'abusive'.
/r/MensRights06/01/10 07:21 PM
1

Let her run her mouth. Maybe it will motivate Mr. Woods into filing assault charges and possibly donating to Men's Rights organizations.
/r/MensRights06/01/10 05:57 PM
5

Interesting law - and by interesting I mean "batshit insane". Has the potential to turn every married man into a criminal.
/r/MensRights06/01/10 03:29 PM
1

Thank you. Just in time for Valentine's day.
/r/MensRights06/01/10 02:56 PM
1

Ok, when put that way, yes, I agree.
/r/MensRights31/12/09 03:59 AM
2

Gay mens rights aren't mens rights? I am of the opinion they are two different things. I'm not even sure we are even talking about the intersection of two different types of rights - men's rights and gay rights. But feel free to make your case, because I think its an interesting and important question.
/r/MensRights30/12/09 02:30 PM
3

I think the wit whose sole comment was "Jerry! Jerry! Jerry! Jerry!" just about covers all that can be said about this event.
/r/MensRights29/12/09 06:19 PM
4

And why not? As long as the law refuses to punish fraud and continues to reward this thinly veiled form of slavery, why shouldn't women continue this sort of behavior? I can only wonder how a society that rewards dysfunctional families and targets traditional nuclear families will hold together during any sort of challenging times.
/r/MensRights22/12/09 11:57 PM
2

Anything that makes young girls discard their Bratz dolls is a good thing, I say. I'm not even going to touch on the older "Dora the Explorer" that explores...malls.
/r/MensRights18/12/09 08:25 PM
5

Oh well. Can't please everybody.
/r/MensRights18/12/09 04:06 PM
2

But buying a guy a tool or sporting event ticket isn't sexist. No. But tickets to the Nutcracker? Yes.
/r/MensRights16/12/09 07:16 PM
6

Easy. claps hands, rubs them together A number of white rights groups labor to protect a privilege - jobs, a location, political power. Men's rights labor to gain equal treatment. Terrorism is a tactic often employed by white rights groups, men's rights groups do not employ these methods. I can't think of any blacks that labor in white rights groups. A number of women work with and in Men's rights groups - just as a number of non-blacks were responsible for the creation of the NAACP, and men wer…
/r/MensRights14/12/09 06:24 PM
2

That's not what she said. Stop it. You make a number of good arguments CM, but it will be hard to take your postings seriously in the future if you continue to use such tactics.
/r/MensRights14/12/09 05:53 PM
2

Though logical in theory, this pretty much goes against human evolution until this point in time, and gives guys a legal out to be irresponsible assholes. (why should I care if I knock her up? I won't have to deal with it anyway!) How would this go against evolution? That doesn't even make sense. If you mean culture or tradition, then I would agree, but point out that its true for patriarchal societies. A number of matriarchal societies - ironically enough - see the male responsibility ending at…
/r/MensRights14/12/09 05:46 PM
2

No problem babe. Guess you'll need to get a cleaning job to help out, and since I don't have experience doing anything but golf, I guess I'll get a job at the carwash. Our low income gets us access to public housing. It will be like a 21st century equivalent to "Good Times".
/r/MensRights13/12/09 04:30 AM
2

Of all the... how in the hell can a show about anthropomorphic trains be sexist? Was there a sexual harassment episode? Hot train-on-train action in the "Trains gone Wild" video?
/r/MensRights13/12/09 03:43 AM
3

But but but, how will he make his child support payments if they keep him in jail? What about the chiiiiildren? Wouldn't keeping him in jail not be in their best interests?
/r/MensRights12/12/09 05:31 PM
1

Wow. It seems to be pretty solid proof that a number of state governments are deliberately encouraging corruption. Or are state employees allowed to submit reimbursements without receipts or accounting safeguards?
/r/MensRights10/12/09 04:29 PM
2

Can someone answer a question for me? What are we talking about honor killings for? That is something you see in cultures that have barely emerged from tribalism - not 21st century nation states. In fact, its very much illegal here, and an exercise in preaching to the choir. Why not complain to western men about foot binding while you're at it - its just as relevant.
/r/MensRights04/12/09 03:45 PM
1

Yes, I just wish he didn't live in Washington DC. Maybe I'll get "responsible government" under my tree this year.
/r/MensRights04/12/09 11:54 AM
5

Hold on now - at least when mom gets the cash the father gets an itemized list detailing how the money was spent, right? An expense report would allow him to see how the money was being spent so that he could be reassured that the child was benefiting. Anything less would be kind of irresponsible.
/r/MensRights03/12/09 08:06 PM
5

I'm sure a number of feminists would argue that. But until they kick out the bigots, narcissists and selfish poseurs, the fringe lunatics will be taken as the mainstream of their movement. The men's movement could just as easily fall victim to this trap of failing to police one's own ranks. Something to think about.
/r/MensRights30/11/09 08:24 PM
3

Therefore, having a men’s officer or a men’s campaign actually reinforces the advantage that men have, and makes it harder for the women’s campaign to succeed. I would certainly like to see an example of where a men's officer or campaign has lessened the rights to women, as opposed to a panicked surmise masquerading as logic.
/r/MensRights24/11/09 03:01 AM
2

Now if you'll all excuse me, I'm going to go finger flower now, and pollinate another. I've never had a threesome before! RAPIST!!1! edit: My freshman English teacher would cite this as a classic example of how men's (non-op or not) testosterone poisoning leads them to rape rape rape. Oh, I know - that bud was just asking for it - letting its stamen just hang out brazenly with flashy colors, that round full pistil. Regardless, we need to come clean and move this subreddit from a room of fail to …
/r/MensRights20/11/09 02:25 PM
1

Is it SO against the progressive ideals of liberalism to want a male equality movement?! Absolutely not. Equality and justice were the defining issues of liberalism. Its just the balancing between equality and justice where liberals can go off the rails at times.
/r/MensRights20/11/09 07:40 AM
4

A longtime favorite list. I've got my calendar set up so it rotates through a different virtue each week and pops up a reminder so I can focus on it specifically. My only problem with it is #13. Could we imitate someone who is humble and died of old age rather than capital punishment?
/r/MensRights18/11/09 02:36 PM
1

Health as in physical, mental and/or financial. Like you said - a pretty big loophole.
/r/MensRights18/11/09 02:30 PM
8

Hmm. Its almost if all the problems that feminism arose to oppose have been vanquished, and all that is left is outdated resentment and frustrated hate looking for a target. Sort of like the west after the Cold war was won - feminism has been denied an enemy through victory, and is having difficulty transitioning to a new world. They want to keep that winning feeling going, even if it means making new enemies.
/r/MensRights17/11/09 08:54 PM
4

I wonder if it gives them reason to pause - if they have the right to define what the Men's rights movement is all about, are they really as powerless as they claim? You would think they would be treading very cautiously here - if they get to define the Men's movement, why shouldn't men get to define Feminism?
/r/MensRights16/11/09 02:59 AM
2

Her body, her choice. Ergo - her choice, her responsibility.
/r/MensRights15/11/09 09:34 PM
4

Easy. Ask her how women who never suffered those discriminations are entitled to an anti-discrimination entitlement. If you want to twist the knife, tell her those laws weren't meant to be permanent, but more akin to a training bra that is discarded once their rights fully develop. Why is she afraid of discarding her training bra? Do the challenges of being an adult and a woman intimidate her?
/r/MensRights11/11/09 06:44 PM
1

Its a bit of a stretch to equate Father's rights to any "Christian patriarchy" movement ala "The Handmaiden's Tale".
/r/MensRights09/11/09 08:19 PM
2

I'm not a psychiatrist, but that does sound like schizophrenia.
/r/MensRights06/11/09 11:01 AM
6

A lot of the leaders are still convicted batterers What? Edit: Quick summarization. Men are violent liars. Things are just peachy the way they are.
/r/MensRights05/11/09 07:10 PM
3

The earlier books are the worst. The later ones are slightly more balanced. The videos are very fair. Watched a couple with my kids. Can't say I was ever offended by them. The stories seem to focus more on the kids and their mistakes and dramas, with coaching from the parents occasionally. I would go as far as to say they were conservative in the best sense.
/r/MensRights03/11/09 07:55 PM
6

Further discussion elicited the information that the board of directors of the Gospel Rescue Mission perceived that children in a men's shelter would be in greater danger than children in a women's shelter. Funny. I would assume it would be the other way around. More suspicious eyes, more people willing to rush to a child's defense. Their attitude seems to say, if a man is in a homeless shelter, its because he is a loser. If a woman is in a homeless shelter, its because she is a victim.
/r/MensRights03/11/09 07:45 PM
6

Actually, I'm a bit surprised she didn't combine the "all men are violent" meme with the "men deserve it" meme and "women are sugar and spice" meme to suggest that a man in drag was running around kicking men in the nuts. Its the "Who else but a man in drag could - nay, would go around kicking other men" conspiracy.
/r/MensRights30/10/09 06:11 PM
24

And winner of the Nobel prize for shameless brown-nosing to women goes to....
/r/MensRights22/10/09 03:38 PM
1

This isn't about me - this is about why one term may or may not be more offensive than the other. If you want to be offensive and work off some personal issues send me an email so I can ignore you properly.
/r/MensRights20/10/09 05:31 PM
2

Nuance. Dick has a more proactive connotation which some people may see as good. Cunt seems to be saying "you value is that of a hole or abscess".
/r/MensRights19/10/09 04:35 PM
1

Well, that's one relationship that's done.
/r/MensRights17/10/09 11:40 AM
3

Sleezeballs have two legs of support. 1) Other sleezeballs and 2) Women who like sleezeballs. Since I am neither of these, I'm not sure how I am expected to have any influence on these 'men behaving badly'. Perhaps NOW should create a "spot a sleeze" iphone application that allows you to twitter photographs of sleezeballs, and has links to "partner of a sleezeball" social services. A lot more productive than their usual "two legs good, men bad" rhetoric.
/r/MensRights17/10/09 11:24 AM
1

The guy was bankrupt, and she refused to come to terms with reality and tighten her belt. Did he have hidden accounts offshore? Who knows. But if they aren't recognized as existing by the legal system, how did she expect a suit to get to the cash. A smarter move would have been to just assume he was broke and get her finances in order.
/r/MensRights17/10/09 11:03 AM
1

Well, if she wants to "energize the base" cartoon-like demagoguery like "men behave badly" will probably stir things up - a bit. Probably won't accomplish anything beyond that short burst of energy and cash into NOW's coffers. And reduce the number of people that take them seriously, or even want to talk to them.
/r/MensRights17/10/09 10:33 AM
1

Uh huh. And if Dove bars came up with an iPhone app that let you pick from a number of stereotyped guys with strategies on how to suck money from them, fake rape reports and child abuse evidence, links to divorce firms,and tweet the payoff, we wouldn't be offended. At all. Its kind of hard to use this application - even in jest - and not look like a douche. Just sayin.
/r/MensRights14/10/09 05:39 PM
2

Definitely easier than having her sign a licensing agreement for my sperm!
/r/MensRights09/10/09 02:50 PM
1

A divorce tour. Awesome Idea. Even better, he should have his own program at Wedding Shows. Men only, of course.
/r/MensRights05/10/09 05:51 PM
3

A nice closing statement would have been, "Just as long as you admit you are a bigot".
/r/MensRights02/10/09 03:24 AM
7

Kind of struck by the number of quotes that focus on how important it is to destroy families, and their relative success in the Western world in meeting this goal. Confucius made note of the importance of family as the building block of any society worth living in, and the basis of its stability. Wrecking the family unit and putting all their hopes in a vision of a society where the state is big daddy seems... ill advised.
/r/MensRights01/10/09 04:18 PM
1

I was just thinking about why you never see articles like this below in guy's magazines: "Dear Motorweek, My company provided me with a Porche Cayman to drive, and have included all servicing and fuel. And yet, I prefer riding in my old AMC Gremlin with the hornets nest in the back, and broken spring in the seat that jabs my crotch. What do i do?"
/r/MensRights30/09/09 08:00 PM
3

Life is about embracing risk. Go with the passionate boyfriend because you only live once girlfriend. Tell your husband he is a boring sap and you are cheating on him. Be sure to hand him a signed notarized confession ( in case he doesn't believe you) and pictures (so he will know what real romance looks like) Enjoy your awesome new life. And remember - no pain, no gain!
/r/MensRights30/09/09 02:15 PM
7

Not good enough. What we are talking about here is a form of slavery and fraud. The resources and opportunities lost may not be recoverable. And yet not only is in not considered a crime, the state and authorities often condone it.
/r/MensRights25/09/09 10:31 PM
2

Yes. Marriage is a gamble of sorts. And as usual, the house wins.
/r/MensRights22/09/09 11:11 AM
3

Easily surmountable. Knew of one guy who just pretended he was gay chef to get around these obstacles. The girls knew he was straight, it was just a matter of keeping the secret from the nosy landlord. Needless to say, he was always dealing with one wacky situation after another...
/r/MensRights21/09/09 01:49 AM
6

Its a complicated world. The simple concept of "all of x is good, all of y is bad" is comforting to some people. Some people are just female supremacists, and will always side with mommy. And some guys think its easier to get into feminist's pants if they roll over on their bellies and pee on themselves like a puppy. Like I mentioned earlier, its a complicated world.
/r/MensRights18/09/09 10:15 PM
1

Private child support collection firms? The oppressive clumsiness of government married to the sociopathic chase for dollars? What could go wrong?
/r/MensRights17/09/09 05:18 PM
1

Following the Paris Hilton path to fame makes a tempting case for sharing it though.
/r/MensRights16/09/09 03:30 PM
4

You know what movie I'd like to see? "Not without my son" The story of a Cuban father's attempts to have the US government put his rights as father above his dead wife's wishes, scheming relatives plans and machinations of a political elite. Maybe it needs more explosions and a killer robot from the future.
/r/MensRights16/09/09 02:28 PM
2

Mmm-hmm. Let me see if I can manufacture some outrage to go with the manufactured story....and....no. Sorry.
/r/MensRights16/09/09 02:23 PM
9

Hey sister, go sister, soul sister, flow sister Hey sister, go sister, soul sister, go sister edit: "I think the girl who is able to earn her own living and pay her own way should be as happy as anybody on earth. The sense of independence and security is very sweet. " - Susan B. Anthony. ;)
/r/MensRights14/09/09 06:21 PM
2

What does it accomplish? Well, it allows us to focus all of our attention and energy on the outlier characters and cartoon online personalities. This is energy that should be going into making a fairer and more just legal system and society, helping boys become healty men and reflecting on what it means to be a man in today's world.
/r/MensRights12/09/09 04:30 PM
5

Funny. I thought football was a metaphor for forced male castration, that's why feminazis get so excited about it. So what am I supposed to think about field hockey, where a bunch of women are chasing and swinging at a ball with a curved club?
/r/MensRights10/09/09 06:18 PM
0

Thanks for the link. That there is the Comstock lode of crazy.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 06:11 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter