~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 | Are there any Youtube channels that do the MRA/Gender Egalitarian equivalent of what Crowbcat does?Ben Shapiro doesn't give a flying fuck about egalitarianism lol | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/01/22 09:17 AM |
| 3 | For a subreddit with so many open socialists, I still cannot fucking BELIEVE that MensLib explicitly bans discussion of "paper abortion"What's the connection to socialism? | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/11/21 04:57 AM |
| 8 | So, AskFeminists finally recognized that we exist....I call those "regressive MRAs" because they're more interested in opposing or reverting women's progress to regain their perceived dominance than actually fixing men's issues. They just use men's rights as a shield to try to give their arguments moral legitimacy by referencing real problems | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 04/10/21 10:18 PM |
| 1 | Campaign to remove Clementine Ford as the speaker of a Lifeline event for tweeting 'Kill all men'Some say the thread continued until the next smiley face. | /r/MensRights | 02/05/18 03:40 PM |
| 1 | "Women were oppressed in the past, therefore it justifies the plight of young men today."In what respect does this approach "work"? It certainly won't convince someone to rethink their views, which I believe is what OP is trying to accomplish. "Beating them at their own game" feels nice, but only serves to antagonize them and hurt your social standing for the sake of potentially making them feel bad for a bit. The point of this post is the flaw in "an eye for an eye" logic so that doesn't really hold water either. I'm not necessarily opposing that this "women in the past" "argument"… | /r/MensRights | 02/05/18 05:11 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter