TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

czarist Archive

View 0 posts and 49 comments by czarist on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

le reddit army shall rise up against the oppression of men
/r/MensRights11/02/18 11:33 PM
1

It's been illegal multiple times to publish negative material about the USA government. and the Sedition Act is seen today as heavily unconstitutional. youre not really helping your case here.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 10:55 PM
-3

this is a good point. youve tempered my initial opinion
/r/MensRights18/12/17 10:47 PM
-4

I never said that. To be honest, I don't think too highly of the people who killed the fire alarm, either. The issue is, this subreddit in particular can often be overly antagonistic towards those with differing viewpoints, moreso than others I've seen. I'm not attacking MRA ideas, I just really dislike how many of these arguments are framed solely in terms of their contrast/opposition to feminism.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 04:24 AM
0

Case in point.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 03:42 AM
34

I agree with many of the views expressed in /r/MensRights but comments like this are why I don't think too highly of this place.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 01:54 AM
2

It's a little misleading to say that, because the debate regarding the remaining gap has had many economists argue discrimination and many argue natural/inherent human nature.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 12:30 PM
1

Thanks for the actual answer. I appreciate the response.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 02:53 PM
-1

This is literally the exact same image. I don't know why people upvoted this.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 02:53 PM
-7

Source? Like I said, drawing layman's conclusions off of a diagram like this isn't really science.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 01:53 PM
-11

Why would this make you spread your legs farther apart? I agree that the idea of manspreading is ridiculous, but this seems like a lot of pseudoscience.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 01:39 PM
2

Why would this make you spread your legs farther apart? I agree that the idea of manspreading is ridiculous, but this seems like a lot of pseudoscience.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 01:38 PM
2

I'm still confused as to how Oxford Online / Google are being bigoted. Unless you're referring to something else.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 11:57 AM
4

big·ot ˈbiɡət/ noun a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions. ??? How are they being bigoted ???
/r/MensRights12/07/17 11:41 AM
6

Surprised I had to scroll so far down to see this. Words that mean similar things can absolutely have different contextual meanings, especially when it comes to men vs women.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 11:40 AM
21

Thank you for pointing this out. I hate these damn double standards
/r/MensRights04/06/17 10:38 PM
2

Racists don't bother to do fact checking. What a surprise.
/r/PussyPass24/04/17 01:09 AM
2

This argument really doesn't make any sense. Historically, Congress has always overrepresented white males. That doesn't mean that minorities and females were voting in white males to protect their own interests.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 04:49 PM
4

I really have a hard time believing that government sanctioned oppression of males will happen on a significant scale, considering ~70% of our legislative body are white males.
/r/MensRights20/04/17 12:39 PM
8

Yeah, really clues you in to the state of affairs on this subreddit.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:17 AM
7

Because people don't like to be intellectually challenged any farther than a picture taken out of context. This is a problem with /r/MensRights and most other popular political subs. It's really just sad.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:40 AM
8

Why am I not surprised that this is so far down?
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:38 AM
17

Yeah, he's going fishing for female attention in /r/MensRights of all places. Get over yourself.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 12:36 AM
5

Seriously. I can't be the only one who thinks this is a really strange comment.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 01:55 AM
3

sometimes, when casually visiting, I feel as if this subreddit tends to hate on women for the hell of it. Back when /r/altright was up, it was the same thing. People would post articles of a black guy who was convicted of murdering a white guy.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 06:18 PM
-3

You misinterpreted my first point. It's not that it's popular, it's that we're not seeing any real negative health consequences. Whereas women in some states can be forced to carry out a pregnancy that would be directly detrimental to their well being. Besides, there's no legal mandate for circumcision. If you don't want your kid to be circumsized, that's cool. Don't do it. Even if you were circumsized as a child, there are a myriad of reconstruction services and surgeries that you can undergo t…
/r/MensRights25/01/17 05:14 PM
-3

this circumcision BS doesn't matter. It's been common in America for decades, so why hasn't our male population seen emerging negative health trends in comparison to European countries where it is uncommon? the majority of us circumsized here in America are indifferent to the process.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 04:58 PM
13

he's tweeting about it, obviously
/r/MensRights25/01/17 02:03 PM
10

a right to their own body
/r/MensRights25/01/17 02:02 PM
2

I'd like to share this comment from elsewhere in this thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5q0bil/comment/dcviffj?st=IYD0MPWM&sh=2c8bc084
/r/MensRights25/01/17 01:58 PM
-3

You would think this subreddit would be for political and social discussion, not hate-reading and laughing at stupid people. See: /r/Feminism
/r/MensRights15/01/17 09:49 PM
0

To be fair, I think Blue is really the only one at fault here. Pink's comment is probably a tongue in cheek joke-- it's the kind of sarcastic remark that I could see anyone making.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 09:40 PM
3

Because it has literally nothing to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights15/01/17 09:38 PM
1

Right? Why is no one talking about this? There must be an explanation
/r/MensRights15/01/17 09:38 PM
-3

This is such a shitpost lol. Most of these statistics would have shown similar trends in the 1950's. Does that mean that male privilege wasn't existent during that time?
/r/MensRights09/01/17 04:46 PM
10

I don't know why you downvoted the other person. They were absolutely right.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 10:55 PM
2

I never said it was OK. I'm just saying we should be more understanding since we don't know the whole story.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/16 06:35 PM
2

I just said I wouldn't, but I can understand how that lady might shove him once, if she is telling the truth.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/16 06:34 PM
1

For sure. I just can't stand these comments painting him as this poor old martyr getting beat up for no reason. We don't know the whole story, and if what she's saying is true, the old man is just as much to blame. After all, it was only a shove that knocked him down. I've seen people get shoved for a lot less than the "n word".
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/16 05:44 PM
-1

So is it somehow black people's fault that the word "nigger" still exists? I'm not condoning violence, I'm just saying we shouldn't be defending this old man as some kind old martyr until we know for sure whether or not he used racial slurs.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/16 05:40 PM
3

(ง ͡ʘ ͜ʖ ͡ʘ)ง Put em' up, asshole
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/16 05:38 PM
0

I could not disagree more with what you just said, but this is not where the discussion is at right now. We are specifically discussing the implications of racial slurs in the context of violence.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/16 05:16 PM
-1

Likewise, telling people to just "ignore" blatant racism legitimizes racism in and of itself. Does that mean violence is the uncompromising answer? No, of course not. What it means is that we need to take it seriously and shame the person who says it, instead of just telling the victim to "suck it up." And in that same vein, I can somewhat sympathize with the person who has a violent reaction to that kind of behavior.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/16 05:15 PM
2

Not in my opinion, but I have to emotionally sympathize with those who do lash out.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/16 05:13 PM
-5

Really compelling argument.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/16 05:11 PM
-5

It's not as simple as "upset" or "not upset". If I call a black guy an idiot, that is offensive and upsetting to him, but it probably wouldn't be too bad of an issue. If I call a black guy the n word, I am explicitly putting him down based off of the circumstances his birth and nothing more. I am calling to mind the centuries of oppression his people faced, and implicitly telling him, "you are no better". I am calling him subhuman. You can't deny the emotional weight and stigma this word carries…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/16 04:10 PM
2

That's not what we're discussing. We're discussing if calling someone a derogatory racial slur is grounds for violence. And I think you can definitely sympathize with the attacker if that happened to be true.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/16 04:07 PM
0

They don't seem to realize that "cracker" was started by rich white people to poke fun at poor white people.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/16 03:49 PM
-6

If someone called me a raghead, terrorist, coolie, etc. I'd be pretty livid. I consider myself a relatively peaceful person, but I can totally see someone lashing out if they're degraded that way. Especially when it comes to a word like "nigger". People don't like hearing this, but you can't begin to imagine what that feels like unless you're black yourself. EDIT: WTF, how is this even a controversial thing to say? EDIT: I'm not arguing that it's legally justified. I'm just saying, if he really …
/r/PussyPassDenied13/11/16 03:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter