TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

czwarty_ Archive

View 0 posts and 72 comments by czwarty_ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

some raped me and beat me up a certified "real, normal work like any other" moment
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/01/22 11:38 AM
36

I thought so too but after seeing the "bri'ish girl" meme I changed my view. British broads can be absolutely trashy as fuck
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/01/22 02:15 PM
110

Lol, I have a feeling she finds him handsome like a grandma finds her overweight grandson handsome. It's not the same as "sexy". They were friends for long time, she thought he "looks ok", he also probably doesn't dress slobby or wear fedoras and that's enough for her to say he's "handsome". I heard women say that about their unattractive friends before and that's exactly it - "handsome just not my type". Lmao. She married that man, she still has some of cognitive dissonance to go through before…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/11/21 07:46 PM
9

lmao how is it against blackpill? the exact difference is that blackpill understands that aesthetics and looks are more important than "confidence" "frame" and "game" or whatever bullshit redpill grandpas talks about, and k-pop stars or androgynous e-boys are perfect examples of this. they're pretty, they don't have to be masculine or confident or rich or whatever. their pretty faces and aesthetic bodies are everything they need to make women love them
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/21 12:49 PM
0

If it was simply matter of gender imbalance then all men would struggle on online dating, which is obviously not the case. I don't have any trouble getting dates from OLD and neither do my friends... those few friends who are good looking. Those less fortunate are of course struggling. If it's case of gender imbalance then it's very interesting those with pretty faces are magically immune to this factor :^)
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/21 10:08 PM
11

here go my evening plans smh
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/21 11:19 AM
1

that's what you get for snooping through someone's shit
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/21 09:46 AM
18

Plus the amount of fat women who literally think it's some capitalist conspiracy that created "beauty standards" that made men be not attracted to them. They're all super hot, it's just that men don't know it yet because media didn't tell them...
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/21 01:19 PM
4

It's true, but I can't agree with "a lot". In my opinion it's rather about avoiding things that make you unattractive than doing things to become attractive, list of the latter is very short. You're dealt your looks and there is a lot of stuff you can do to ruin it - eat bad and get fat, or be too skinny and look unhealthy (malnutrition despite keeping proper caloric intake), dress like shit, have shit haircut, get ugly tattoos or piercings, have no hygiene etc etc. avoiding these things is in y…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/21 08:28 PM
75

This is not "funny answer", this is the real answer. Ask any man who was an ugly duckling and experienced a glowup in later years. The difference in how you're treated is so huge it's almost as if you entered a parallel universe.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/21 08:02 PM
12

"This is a gross over simplification" unlike your genius statement that customers and producers of porn are equally the same
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/21 07:27 PM
20

"you don't like capitalism but you use iphone and drink cocacola, what a hypocrite" both r-worded arguments
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/21 04:38 PM
2

But in 40% there is an expectation, just with realistic approach that this won't happen. Someone who wants a relationship but doesn't try anymore is still someone who wants a relationship, but now is just aware of reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/21 02:37 PM
4

But you still don't get the point that those 40% _did_ "crave" it to turn into relationship, they just knew they would not get it. You want something but know you won't get it but you still want it even if you're realistic about expectations the "wants" don't disappear. They try to explain it to you with analogies and parallels but you still don't get it lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/21 02:34 PM
–

I love how in this sub whenever someone posts a study that, once again, proves looks is the most important factor in male attractiveness, there's loads of comments like in original thread: "no shit"; "you need study for that????"; and my favourite: "nobody here says looks isn't most important what are you talking about?". Then a thread like this comes with all those "nobodies" who "don't say" that you need a haircut and shower to be attractive lmao. What a fucking circus of a sub
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/21 03:44 PM
1

Fat women like bigger men so they don't feel like they are fat then what the fuck is it with all the fat chicks hitting up on me in clubs. this shit made me really doubt all this "feeling small and safe" bullshit, it might play a role but it's definitely not that big as some play it to be
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/21 12:50 PM
3

sundresses emphasize feminine bodyshape so it's not that
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/21 06:36 PM
0

lmao what. imagine saying this to woman with a guy she friendzoned. "you were dating him, adults don't have >>best friends<<" in fact it's actually perfectly in line with what OP stated, another case where same behaviour in men and women is treated differently
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/21 05:53 PM
1

aren't from their biological fathers I know you meant something else but it made me laugh anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/21 12:24 PM
3

Please give me three examples of fat people actually being considered more attractive than thin people ever in history. I'll save you time, you can't, apart from borderline fetish art like Ruben's. Ancient times - all athletic figures. Medieval art - all thin, long legged women. Modern times - ideal varied, but never reached "medium" size. Inb4 figurines of "venus" and similar - those figurines portray pregnant women, not fat women. And say nothing about percieved attractiveness.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/21 04:17 PM
1

all you care about is sex this is literally the topic of that thread. are you lost?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/21 08:26 AM
1

lmao so what they exist, what effects they have? I have zero idea what the hell you're trying to say there and how it's relevant to topic
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/21 10:03 PM
2

lmao how is that relevant to topic. this doesn't change anything about sexual relations. because it doesn't work. it's like bringing up rain dances rituals in topic about weather engineering, ridiculous
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/21 06:59 PM
26

Passive men have few options you really believe women approach average "passive" guys who have few options? those who get approached have a lot of options, average guys don't get approached
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/21 06:49 PM
1

you realise it's a scam, shit that doesn't work at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/21 04:58 PM
6

It's shocking only if for past few years you were closing your eyes and plugging fingers in ears singing "la la la I can't hear you" like all the women here lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/21 02:36 PM
1

exactly. it's rarely a cause that one of them "lost" attraction...
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/21 01:57 PM
6

That's a status value and it's a whole different topic. In the west older men are considered to be rich and have more status, but when it comes to actual sexual attractiveness, women want young, athletic guys and don't give a shit if he's broke as long as he's good looking.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/06/21 02:31 PM
15

Not really, obese women were never considered hot. That famous figurine of "fat" goddess was meant to portray a pregnant woman. There was no point in human history where fat women were ever considered attractive, no matter how much FA activists would like to rewrite it and manipulate for their own profit. As for small penises, I think you're pointing to ancient sculptures - small genitalia were only symbolic, they were supposed to represent non-erect penises, to portray them in non-aroused state…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/05/21 11:42 AM
1

Yes, exactly. That puffy look is always bad, I have no idea how manly one must be to offset that. Losing weight is so great lookswise because you get your bone structure visible again and you're like reborn man in this moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/21 06:13 PM
1

You can PM me on that if you want
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/21 06:12 PM
4

I'm not feminist but he's right. Read about employment of women until WWI. This was the first time women were "allowed" to work in factories and "serious" physical and intellectual jobs that were reserved to men only, because now all men were needed at the front. This was a breakthrough as it proved and showed women can do well in such jobs. After WWI ended, women were again barred from working there, and this started huge outrage, from which serious socialist-feminist movements were born. Sorry…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/21 01:14 PM
7

Lol. Face is at least as important as height, and most probably even the most important asset. Maybe you're mistaking young look/prettyboy type with babyface, believe me, while the first is attractive, the latter is not. Those guys look undeveloped and immature.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/21 01:07 PM
5

Bro do you really think not being a homophobe or racist or not throwing batteries into ocean requires you to be brainwashed by MKULTRA first? I'm pretty hard against idpol and gov but jesus christ you went full r-word now. And that's while not even mentioning what comments above said which kinda shows how huge of a miss your bullshit claim is.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/21 11:47 AM
5

I don't agree, I am male and sometimes I just want someone to listen to me and understand and that's all. Not to mention some problems just don't have solutions, or the solution is not possible to achieve in some circumstances. It's in these situations I need someone to listen to me, if a problem had solution I would already find it by now.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/21 09:57 AM
1

You realise weight loss makes your face more defined and improves it by greatly? And good body is very important too, thin women are always wanted even if their faces are average, and men always gain attractiveness via working out because shoulder to waist ratio increases. Your claims are baseless, you're either a coper or a projecting chubby chaser
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 08:28 PM
1

Not really, the hormonal imbalance that steroids induce is always going to change few things. But here's also the thing. My hypothesis would be that if you feel only good effects then it's possible that there actually was something wrong with your natural state, maybe too low level of androgens or something, and your steroid use managed to bring it to normal or just slightly above normal, instead of sky high and above - you just hit the sweet spot without knowing and you're basically self-medica…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/21 11:41 AM
5

100% facts. I'm not even redpill but goddamn, after reading loads of those cope comments to OP above ("that's not real love!" LMAO, this had to be written by average male that OP talks about LOL) seeing your comment made me sigh with relief.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 06:26 PM
2

There are no such men, unless they pay for it one way or another. You did the right think. Size is only good when the size is lean.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/21 06:21 PM
15

You're delusional. After I improved my looks my matches in first 24h on tinder rose from 20 to 60. I had complete bio only in first instance, when I looked worse. After I improved looks I didn't even bother anymore, I only wrote one word, name of university where I study. Nobody gives a fuck about it. And before you start replying, you don't even have to believe my anegdotal reports, there were plenty of scientific data posted here on that sub that proves looks are the only reliable factor of at…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/21 02:01 PM
2

oh, you mean he should be above 7? I actually think the opposite, I always thought he looks unremarkable - he doesn't have strong jaw, has puffy cheeks, big ears, not too athletic looking. but again I have similar features to him and I don't like them, so maybe I'm personally biased. women like him a lot so I accept he might be way more attractive than what I think
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 08:33 PM
1

honestly, would you date a guy like that? is that someone who would catch your eye? looking after him in public, looking longer at his photo when encountering it on social media, singling him out when he was introduced to you among a group of other people? because I think you, like a lot of women, are mistaking what is called a "pleasant face" and "trusful look" with attractiveness. as someone said: one of those guys who girls said they'd date him, but they never do also I'm not stating I think …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 08:18 PM
6

Meh dating standards are racist themselves. Situation of asians prove it greatly. Thing about TRM is that they don't have any objective means of ratings, have no idea about Gauss' distribution nor facial features attractiveness scale. They just rate by feeling which is useless by itself, but also they have this fucking stupid thinking that they MUST rate everyone harsh so even hottest people get 6,5 there. Even on lookism forums TRM is being laughed at as delusional, and you must remember lookis…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 08:03 PM
1

check this link: https://people.cs.clemson.edu/\~dhouse/courses/old404/homework/proj/tjcurti/webpage/beginFace.gif
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 07:50 PM
2

he's controversial, I also wouldn't think of him as 7 but there are a lot of women really simping for him. he wouldn't star in womens' magazines and doing semi-erotica sessions if he wasn't highly above average
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 07:49 PM
1

Lol I explained that they're totally different women, you can't compare them. For me Megan Fox isn't even a 7 but I understand someone could think she's a 10. Just like Francisco Lachowski and David Gandy are both 10 despite one being a babyfaced prettyboy and second being masculine chad
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/21 07:47 PM
3

Yeah but he still has wide, oval face with no discerning features and extremely bland eye area. No dimorfism nor "prettyboy" features which makes him bland and not attractive in effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 04:56 PM
2

For what features do you think he's above average? We're talking here only about proportions and bone structure. Hair, skin, eye color (but not shape) must be ignored here. In other comment I already stated that when taking those things into account, which are markers of health, he's indeed above average and this image can be treated as prototype average only for proportions and bones.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 04:55 PM
2

There are two categories of women, "sexy" and "petite". She's indeed a 10 in the latter, perfect bone structure with neotenic features. In "sexy" category some people give Megan Fox as 10, which I can also see when looking objectively, but she doesn't do anything to me, totally not my type and in my personal rating she's barely a bit over average tbh. So I can also understand that if someone prefers Megan Fox type, he might see Emma Watson as not 10 at all, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 04:52 PM
3

In actual decimal scale he is an 8. He's right on entry level to actual top 20%. He has big skull, big chin, good proportions, great symmetry, very good body (which influences face length), good narrow eyes with low sclera show but also those aren't hunter eyes which makes him look very trustworthy. So, attractive, dimorphic male with visible, but not dealbreaking flaws - entry level 8/10 in actual decimal scale. Now, he might not 8/10 when talking in pure lookism scale taking only bone structur…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 04:48 PM
4

Ohh didn't notice, right. then you got a good idea of average face. just remember the "averageness" in it is only about face features' proportions and shapes - and apart from that this guy still has perfect skin, healthy hair, proper eye area and facial symmetry. IRL even people with perfect facial structure struggle with some of those things - this average guy IRL would just keep face shape, but also could have eye bags, weak or fluffy eyebrows, be balding/have curly hair, malocclusion, unhealt…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 03:00 PM
27

that TRM chart is r-worded as fuck, even incels have better scale, at least it has some core points that gives somewhat objectivity https://incels.wiki/images/a/a5/Scale.jpg and actual prototype average guy is this: https://www.uni-regensburg.de/Fakultaeten/phil\_Fak\_II/Psychologie/Psy\_II/beautycheck/english/schemaanpassungen/m(1-4)-g\_an\_m(1-32)-s.jpg
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/21 02:46 PM
8

They do, but that's the core of the issue. They don't consider entirety of them "men". By saying "men", those women mean "men that I consider sexually viable, at least to some degree". Which is above 5/10 and higher; the rest of males is invisible, basically doesn't exist to them. They're there as NPCs, fillers, but not actual persons. And when one starts seeing this issue through that kind of glasses, all of that is starting to make sense. When a set consists only of those that in normal scale …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/21 05:49 PM
1

OP didn't state "ugly guys are better for relationships" but "ugly guys have easier way getting relationships". Those two things are not really related at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/21 05:33 PM
36

less attractive guys actually have easier time getting commitments and Long-term relationships than hot ones of the same profile/financial status what
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/21 12:56 PM
2

Lol no, I'm white and I live in 99% white country in eastern Europe. Why, as in, girls having sex with black guys would be primarily size queens treating them by default as having big dick?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 05:53 PM
5

Nope, or at least they didn't show it too much
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 01:40 PM
3

Those "good" traits like being nice, agreeable, empathetic, non-aggressive, non-dismissive or annoyed are considered clasically feminine so they "give me tingles" automatically. It goes even further, when I see a girl works in "care job" (teacher, nurse, vet, caretaker etc) I consider her more attractive since it makes her seem more empathetic. I can't stand "bad bitches", there's nothing feminine about that. I don't know if that's the case with most men in populace, but definitely a case for me…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 12:18 PM
5

Same. I WISH women were as obsessed with dick size as some men make it out to be lmao. But sadly it's not the case. It's usually some few nice comments (always appreciated ofc!) and that's it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/21 12:15 PM
2

he just fucked up the timestamp, should start from 0:11 for context
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/21 10:08 PM
1

probably had twins or triplets once or she simply lies about her age lol
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/04/21 05:22 PM
16

yeah it's basic eboy style nothing even much extravagant about it. lmaoing hard at dude who either slept through last five years of popculture in his cave or is coping hard calling this "drag queen"
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/21 09:00 PM
18

Yeah. As she admits, even when it comes to vulnerability, you still have to keep up the act. But the thing is that the whole point of showing vulnerability is that you get to lower your guard for a while and let emotions flow, so by mere definition you don't get to choose the moment...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/21 11:56 PM
4

Yes, as in actual limerence, not "crush". Extremely exhausting and left me with awful feeling of hopelesness. Esp since it happened like 1,5 year after my gf in long and serious relationship left me, right after I got over that, so it was in worst possible moment. I don't even know what I can write more. It was awful and if someone thinks it's "just a crush" then he didn't bother reading the article or didn't understand a word from it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/21 02:34 PM
1

I fucking WISH it was true lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/21 07:17 PM
7

It is possible to condemn sexual misconduct and also be aware that women do have advantage in dating. Those are two different things, I don't know why it keeps being brought up. Of course I realise that those things might make some women anxious in dating due to obvious sexual nature, but we gotta realise that there's a big difference between one and the other. Stalking and stubborn solicitations are not flirting and dating, just like rape is not sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 07:13 PM
1

Same
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/21 04:23 PM
5

you're just going full "no true scotsman" at this moment. you redefine "good personality" and "niceness" to hell and back to avoid confronting what he said
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/21 01:17 PM
0

I mostly agree with your post but come on, Johnny Depp is still looking good. He has godly bone structure, doesn't have flappy skin or sunburns. He of course is long past his peak but I definitely can't agree he's ugly. Biggest age-loser is probably Brendan Fraser - now that's a guy who hit the wall.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/21 11:12 PM
3

he's 4'11, he can't grow neither his spine nor his chin
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/21 03:43 PM
1

he's not average lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/21 03:41 PM
1

also depends how you "dodged it", huge difference if it was said in teasing or serious tone ofc
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/20 07:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter