TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

d357r0y3r Archive

View 1 post and 28 comments by d357r0y3r on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

d357r0y3r/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 10:41 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

This is pathetic "lay down and rot" thinking. The point isn't that any guy can have as much success as your stereotypical Chad. It's that any guy can make progress, develop confidence, and become more attractive. Maybe that means you could only get 1s before but now you can get 4s.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/21 07:30 PM
2

Yeah, I think so. TRP gets a lot of shit as being basically PUA or misogynistic, and I think there's a kernel of truth there, but there are some critical lessons within TRP that men have to understand. Big takeaways: AF/BB: Optimizing around things like seeming rich or like a good provider has to be used sparingly. Things are actually less likely to work out if women see you as boyfriend/husband material. Counterintuitively, downshifting into "fuckboi" material ends up improving results. Spinnin…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/21 03:37 AM
1

A man in his 30-40's who lifts, has a billion dollars on his account and is 7ft tall doesn't have a problem dating 20yo's. I actually think there isn't a single man, dead or alive, who matches that description, lol. Blackpillers really out here thinking women go for 7 foot tall billionaires.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/21 08:41 PM
7

Your question is formulated to get an affirming response. It's a no-brainer. Given two women, who are exactly the same in every way, except one makes more money, guys take the woman with more money? Wow, who would have thought? Go back to your cohort of dudes and change the question. 5/10 career woman vs 7/10 lesser career woman. You might get some different responses.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 12:56 AM
12

women are at their most attractive overall around 18-22 This isn't a thought or an opinion, this is the result of surveying men of various ages and showing them photos of women at various ages. Yes, there are beautiful older women and women of all ages. Some women experience some kind of "glow up" and are more attractive at 30 than 18. Many things happen. The 18-22 figure isn't about edge cases, it's about the general case. that men don't care about how much money a woman makes or how cool her c…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/21 12:40 AM
32

"Average" isn't an option for men. With 2 female ancestors for every 1 male, "average" is teetering on the edge of being a genetic dead end. Luckily, the average man is fat, out of shape, and broke, so becoming above average isn't the biggest chore in the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/21 03:58 PM
1

16% is incredibly common. That means for every ~7 couples you see on the street, 1 of them has a >5 year age gap. No one is denying that the vast majority of relationships are between people of similar age.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/21 10:55 PM
27

The conversations on this sub around age gaps is so repetitive and reductive. You hear a lot of "no 40M is getting with 18F" and a lot of "successful older men have no problem getting with 18-year olds." Neither of these things are true. Large age gaps (12+) are rare, especially with really young women. Medium-sized age gaps (5-11) are incredibly common. FDS will shit on 35M for supposedly thinking they can date 18F, but 35M usually aren't trying for 18F, they're trying for like, 24-29. Older gu…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/21 04:52 PM
0

Yeah, I mean it worked in the sense that it was a viable dating app for the average guy. If you were below average or had issues, you've always had problems. But, there was a time in the early days of Tinder where a lot of people were having success. That's not the case these days if you ask around. OKCupid suffered a similar fate. OKC circa 2009-2012 was a solid dating app, especially for finding relationships. These days, it's not even worth making a profile on. Online dating specifically is a…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/21 02:48 PM
0

It actually is, yeah. Tinder actually worked 6 years ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/21 01:58 PM
3

You are saying "you," but I haven't said anything about my experience. I said this board is full of guys that have had that kind of experience and it didn't work out. They tapped too much into feminine energy, realized it was a bad formulation, and reclaimed more of the masculine energy. When guys go the "sensitive and vulnerable" route, they're not doing it to attract, they're doing it because they're actually hurt in some way and want to share it. No one cries or shares difficult information a…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/21 07:19 PM
3

It has nothing to do with testosterone, and I've seen no evidence that men these days have less testosterone than men in the past. Sounds like you haven't been looking for evidence. Today is your lucky day! Studies show that men’s testosterone levels have been declining for decades. Testosterone levels show steady decrease among young US men Generational decline in testosterone levels observed
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/21 06:03 PM
3

You lost me at "feminization and pussification of men." I don't think that's a thing (and even if it was, I find the wording rather offensive, as if being feminine was a bad thing). It's absolutely a thing, and women have told me so in not so many words. Being feminine is great, if you're a woman. If you're a heterosexual man, it's going to be a disaster. Women don't all want the same thing in a potential partner, and a lot of us would be more interested in men who are gentler, more sensitive, m…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/21 06:01 PM
5

Can't believe I have to say this, but height and willingness to do household chores is not the value that men bring to the table. Traditionally, things like resource acquisition (income + wealth, proxy for intelligence), physical strength (proxy for vitality), and leadership were domains men needed to excel at. With plummeting testosterone levels in men, a lot of that has evaporated.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/21 03:37 PM
14

This is actually a profound insight. Nice guys are pouring energy into a facet that women tangentially care about (kindness, let's say), but in doing so, lose a lot of what would make them attractive. Career women are pouring energy into something men care about (intelligence, work ethic - I care about these traits for my kids and therefore partner), but often to the exclusion of other things that make them dateable.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/21 02:13 PM
13

I think the point is that the baseline expectation of what is "good" and "normal" has been fucked with in multiple ways. Number 1, I think the feminization and pussification of men is a Real Thing. The quality if the median man actually has gone down. With that said, OPs core point is that women aren't calibrating properly. Let's imagine a "good and normal index," or GNI. As a woman, the GNI of a man who would be willing to marry you one day may be 5. However, you may be able to sleep with a man…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/21 02:06 PM
15

Yeah, I'm sure in some unusual cases it's taught explicitly. But like most things that we "learn," we learn through emulation or through consequences. No one ever told me that you shouldn't cry as a boy, or you shouldn't complain about your problems. I learned what earned me respect with other boys and what lost me respect, and then later, I learned the same, but for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/21 02:53 PM
22

Boys aren't explicitly taught to suppress their emotions; it's a learned behavior. There's little upside to emotionality, but there's plenty of downside.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/21 02:06 PM
2

"Routines" only work initially. They might help you get your foot in the door, that's it. Beyond that, you're going to have to be a good or at least decent conversationalist. Great, you got a number. Now you need to get her out. Are you going to have 30 "routines" lined up to fill 2 hours? "Fake it til you make it" works to some degree, but eventually you're going to have to deal with social ineptness if that's your issue.
/r/seduction16/12/11 10:59 PM
2

You can probably use that to your advantage. If a girl asks you what you do for a living, and you tell them exactly what you do...that's pretty fucking boring. That's what most guys do. Instead, you can intrigue her by not giving her a complete answer. Be mysterious. Preferably, make your job seem interesting without pinning down any of the details - if she were to press you on it, turn it around on her.
/r/seduction03/12/11 12:33 AM
1

We go back to her place and get it on. She's here for another couple weeks and is dtf until she leaves.
/r/seduction29/11/11 03:56 AM
4

This guy is clueless. If you want to live a boring life that lacks great people, take his advice. If you want something more, just standing there and saying nothing isn't going to cut it. What perplexes me is the way he attributes all attempts to improve oneself as "begging for pussy." No idea what's going on in his head, but it has to be a sad, desolate place.
/r/seduction20/10/11 09:07 PM
13

While parts of this article are true (confidence is attractive), it perpetuates some dangerous myths that could really hurt some guys that are struggling with women. O.K., so you want to get laid? Here’s how you do it. Smell clean, get in the proximity of women, and then ignore them. When they come to fuck you, and they will, shut up and let it happen. That's not how you get laid, even if you're very attractive and confident; that's not how our society works. Maybe it's cultural or maybe there a…
/r/MensRights20/10/11 07:34 PM
1

I don't know about this "failure is the goal" mentality. There's really no such thing as failing when you approach; the failure is not approaching. If you're thinking in terms of opportunities, rather than in terms of possible consequences, you'll have fun and feelings of failure/rejection just don't come into play.
/r/seduction08/10/11 11:49 PM
1

If the girl cheats on her boyfriend with you, maybe she doesn't need to be in a relationship at all.
/r/seduction19/08/11 12:52 AM
3

I think you're dead wrong here. Being "alpha" (i.e. a desirable, high value male) means that you don't need to internalize any kind of "fuck you" attitude. True alpha males have a well developed sense of social calibration. They are able to form bonds with other people and demonstrate compassion or consideration when appropriate. This idea that being "Alpha" means only caring about yourself and never considering how your actions might effect others is not just a misconception, it's destructive a…
/r/seduction09/08/11 10:29 PM
1

You might be a sociopath (i.e. anti-social personality disorder), in which case I can't exactly relate to you. Either way, it sounds like a fairly typical case where you've erected an emotional shell of sorts to help deal with the breakup, and it remains with you in any kind of social situation. The fact is, if you can't connect with people (not just attractive girls), you're going nowhere. My recommendation is to focus intensely on self-improvement while forcing yourself into social situations …
/r/seduction20/07/11 09:44 PM
3

Really good article. It's hard to overstate the importance of group dynamics. You can't just look the part and hope to succeed.
/r/seduction20/07/11 05:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter