TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

d3isgay Archive

View 0 posts and 52 comments by d3isgay on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
20

don't be black don't be black don't be black Finally
/r/MensRights13/05/13 09:19 PM
3

So speaking of God complex: They felt safe being anonymous in a crowd. I changed that power dynamic and this is what the uproar is really about. Her comments are truly disgusting and cowardly. It's a good thing this is my blog because the final decision on who's trolling rests with me.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 02:14 AM
3

I would love to see a non feminist report of her TAM fiasco. All I find are links to sites like this. I can't even get through this guy's bio in the sidebar, much less the first sentence of the blogpost
/r/MensRights22/03/13 12:38 AM
5

Only gay men can say things like this without being called rapists
/r/MensRights15/03/13 06:01 AM
-3

did she give you the okay?
/r/MensRights15/03/13 05:57 AM
3

I agree, also because this is in commemoration for a declared "Women's Day". They have to put up something to show their support. If people don't care about women's day, whatever that poster says is moot.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 03:53 PM
4

Same folks who called /r/mensrights a hate group and had to be put on the spot a number of times for them to admit that it is not what they meant (Yes it was).
/r/seduction09/03/13 08:48 AM
1

As it is convenient for their own gain, yea I can see that.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 07:34 AM
3

I'm sorry, but this lady is a stupid fuck: (22) Cathy Meyer says: Jamie, are mothers where you live more able to afford divorce attorneys? Women, on the norm earn less than their husbands. Most women are stay-at-home mothers who have no income of their own. Women are no more likely to have the money for a divorce attorney than men, in your area of any other area. They also have little or not knowledge of family law or court procedure. Men are not voluntarily giving over custody BEFORE attorneys …
/r/MensRights06/03/13 06:10 AM
0

The idea that "women raise kids" is a stereotype that feminists are against right? So why would feminists be proud of that fact when it comes to child custody? Because it's in the woman's favor? How does that movement keep upright when it trips over itself every other step?
/r/MensRights06/03/13 05:50 AM
9

Are women still making less than men? Are women still being told they just need to dress, walk or do something to prevent a man from CHOOSING to rape them instead of society teaching men it is NEVER ok to rape anyone (men or women)? Are less than 1/4 of the US senators women? Are little boys still getting bullied and beat up by ADULTS and children for wearing "girl" colors or liking "girl" toys? At the very least we need girl power and at the least we have admit that girl power is just the start…
/r/MensRights23/02/13 03:13 AM
2

Because feminists feel that classifying people shows that your ideology is "intelligent" and gives one the ability to talk down to people when necessary (all the time for feminists). This also helps them think that 'feminist theory' is a real science and should be studied by everyone everywhere and makes them feel like academics and intellectuals. tl;dr - feminism is fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 04:26 AM
2

I think you meant to emphasize how these redditors shouldn't be labeled as the spokepeople for feminism, not that I don't understand what feminist means unless you want to make this a personal argument (seriously?). Sure I can agree with that. Also, not all females are feminists and not all feminists are female. The majority of those comments agree with the author too that "Men, in comparison, remain quite constant in their desires, unless biological factors come into play." Yet the same reasons…
/r/MensRights12/02/13 06:24 AM
5

I mean, the only reason she feels she can speak on this subject is bc of her kickstarter campaign which she hasn't done anything with after receiving hundreds of thousands of dollars...so why isn't anyone questioning her credentials? Why isn't anyone saying "you aren't even qualified to talk about this as you haven't fulfilled your obligations after being funded to do your research". On a purely academic level, she has NO QUALIFICATIONS TO BE SPEAKING ON THIS SUBJECT. It just seems so obvious to…
/r/MensRights12/02/13 06:19 AM
4

It would also prove detrimental to her whole "i am qualified to talk about video games and social issues as I am a huge gamer yet haven't finished any of these games for which this lecture series is centrally based on" slant. I can see the value in questioning her about her kickstarter scam.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 06:16 AM
2

I don't believe it, but if you read those comments you'll see it's feminist fact.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 06:10 AM
2

Wow those article comments are cancerous. I'm so glad I'm off Facebook and all social networking sites. Just the lowest form of life saying the stupidest shit every.fucking.time.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 04:40 AM
2

The author is only stating that double standard to further their complaint of "why doesn't anyone take the rape of little girls as seriously as the rape of little boys or boys in general" which is a pretty wtf statement to make. It's disingenuous at best, almost glorifying the double standard. And what if Jerry Sandusky had been a woman who victimized boys? Late night hosts would be wagging their eyebrows and yukking it up with their onstage sycophants, morning radio DJ's would play wolf whistle…
/r/MensRights12/02/13 04:24 AM
3

They are hard to find but we DID find this one gem from back in December and we loved it. I almost stopped reading there. What a bunch of sick fucks.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 04:19 AM
8

The fact might be a guy is bi and wants to be visually turned on my nakked men. Well that can't be true, because feminist theory says men have no "sexual plasticicity" because patriarchy. Not making this shit up.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 04:17 AM
4

Birds of a feather squawk together.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 08:26 PM
3

It doesn't mean it justifies her trying to murder her husband. You can't address the 'point of this post' without addressing the obvious. You also can't say "she might've been abused even tho she said she wasn't" in light of what she actually did. Your response justifies her actions which justifies her hiring a hitman to kill her husband, as the court ruled. You are agreeing with the court's decision, so ofc you're going to be refuted esp. when it's an illogical stance to take in light of the ev…
/r/MensRights08/02/13 02:33 AM
1

That's MSM's formula when it comes to influencing the national discourse as well. That's how stories make it to the front page and stay there for weeks.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 04:29 AM
3

and patriarchy
/r/MensRights31/01/13 08:02 AM
8

it'll soon fade into obscurity. become the norm
/r/MensRights30/01/13 04:07 AM
1

Feminists replying to Patrick didn't read the posts thoroughly so you're not alone in that. Except you actually re-read it rather than trying to push your misinterpretation and making blanket statements about men.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 05:27 PM
2

So rather than lawyers, students are forced to give up all legal recourse and rather use an arbiter? gtfo.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 08:23 AM
13

On one hand it sucks that kickstarter can be used to fund scams (though there is a refund provision for unfilled "rewards"), but on the other she scammed her own kind so who gives a crap.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 03:55 PM
10

This kind of shit should come back to haunt the DA and judges who were responsible for the first trial
/r/MensRights28/01/13 02:19 PM
1

Isn't Vancouver THE hotspot for prostitution in Canada? How bad can it be?
/r/MensRights24/01/13 08:36 PM
10

How long ago did this happen? I'll have to see if I can find any links Was she one of the idiots in this video? Please tell me she's the one at the end. So much rage induced from watching this... EDIT: it's hilarious that I'm getting troll PMs bc of my posts in /r/MensRights.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 10:18 AM
3

Dunno why you're being downvoted. because SRS that's why. Watch the ratings on my post :)
/r/MensRights12/01/13 10:33 AM
-3

You realize regulation costs money right? In order to facilitate any federal action or to ensure a mandate is being carried out, there will be committees formed for this express purpose. That will cost money. The government is making insurance companies cover some forms of birth control for free. That costs the insured. Also costs the taxpayer as the insurance company needs to cover those costs.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 04:08 PM
2

Schroller argued in court documents that if a donor is free of parental responsibility only when a doctor performs an insemination, 'then any woman in Kansas could have sperm donations shipped to her house, inseminate herself without a licensed physician and seek out the donor for financial support because her actions made him a father, not a sperm donor. Sounds like that's exactly what the state wants to do. Better the people pay for their own shit amirite?! /s
/r/MensRights01/01/13 04:03 AM
2

It's all about money. Also, just bc it's the State who is the direct aggressor here doesn't change the fact that state law favors the woman almost exclusively. Also doesn't invalidate cases where it's not the state pursuing compensation, unlike this case.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 03:55 AM
2

I remember reading The War Against Boys in 2001, how is it that this book hasn't come up anymore? It was eye opening when I read it at the time. There's more than enough evidence to show the contrary to what feminists have been harping on, the issue was even addressed nationally in a best selling book a decade+ ago. Are people this forgetful? EDIT: The Amazon comments for Greer's book is disgusting and makes me sad for humanity
/r/MensRights20/12/12 01:50 AM
3

No, you put words in my mouth. Therefore injustice EXISTS for men, which is what the post you originally disagreed about was saying. Perhaps you should check your own privilege if you insist on twisting people's words to fit your own agenda. And dont call me buddy, fucknut.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 03:53 AM
0

Sums it up for you perhaps. Not for those of us who are paying attention, you know the guys who are still suffering the consequences of a biased court system that favors women in certain cases DESPITE overwhelming evidence. Oh wait that never happens. Tell that to my last 14 years.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 03:38 AM
8

What about a 'white male in divorce proceedings'? If she acknowledges that white men can be unfairly viewed by the court system during divorce proceedings (how can she not), then she has to realize she's being a hypocrite. Substitute 'white male' for 'male' and why would it be any different for a man of any ethnicity in that situation? There's a just disconnect in logic there that I can't reconcile.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 12:32 AM
1

OP, provide updates please. I hope you can get out of this legally and spit it back in her face.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 08:28 PM
7

By fuck yous you mean downvotes on your comments. Some of them made sense, there are some die hard female haters in this sub but I don't think you getting downvoted constitutes as fuck yous. I haven't seen a fuck you in any of your comment history btw.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 05:32 AM
14

Harry is just very down on himself. Check out his one minute intro, you can see why he has to compensate so much in his writing.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 05:29 AM
2

only falsehood has anything to fear. Someone pass that on to Scientology.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 05:28 AM
6

Regarding her false accusation of James Grissom and his subsequent release: “The focus seems to have been on my character. All supposition aside, it doesn't change what he did to me,” Ylen said in a Facebook message Monday evening. That almost put me over the edge. I don't know how you all get through stories like this without popping a blood vessel or three.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 05:36 AM
2

Yea but she gets it
/r/MensRights14/11/12 09:23 AM
1

Why would you believe that anyway? It's ridiculous and makes no physiological sense
/r/MensRights12/11/12 11:22 PM
15

If this post is even real, I'd like to read the essay in question.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 02:19 AM
2

OP, I hope you follow up with us on this story and let us know what happened, if you do anything at all.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 04:20 AM
2

You should really read the link I provided as they plainly deny calling /r/MR a hate group.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 12:43 AM
18

First retort should've been: Not a hate group EDIT: First google result for "mensrights reddit hate group"
/r/MensRights07/11/12 10:03 AM
2

If you are a selfless person, it is not only wise it's a way of life.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 05:46 AM
2

We live in a post modern society, everything we do is right in our own eyes as is every opinion we have. It's fun to be encouraged to be self righteous and have a fucktard attitude because we're all right to ourselves! /S
/r/MensRights05/11/12 10:09 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter