TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

d_daggins Archive

View 0 posts and 312 comments by d_daggins on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Then you agree with the concept of toxic masculinity, but state otherwise in your post.
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/22 10:36 PM
-1

I read your post. Society defines masculinity as physical strength, dominance, stoicism and similar. To agree that such traits are toxic is to agree with the concept of toxic masculinity
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/22 09:22 PM
1

Interesting. I would agree with your statement here, but your post contradicts it. What then is masculinity. What traits define masculinity
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/22 08:39 PM
-2

Most of these are terrible traits that contribute to the extraordinarily high rate of suicide among men. WTF?
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/22 05:21 PM
-5

This is blatantly false. The number of traditionally "masculine" men who have abused women is extraordinarily high. See MMA, Boxing, Football and all manner of "masculine" stars.
/r/AntiFeminists21/07/22 05:19 PM
1

So just to clarify, you believe a collection of a true or false statement's results, 8% for one and 10% for the other forms a normal distribution?
/r/AntiFeminists19/07/22 11:59 AM
1

I literally defined everything you asked for
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 08:53 PM
0

If your teaching skills are as good as your analysis then yeah I have no doubt that's true
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 07:54 PM
1

Buddy, you've made my day. I can't tell you how thankful I am
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 06:47 PM
0

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/feminism ​ https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/feminism ​ https://www.britannica.com/topic/feminism ​ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminism ​ https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-philosophy/ ​ https://iwda.org.au/learn/what-is-feminism/ ​ ​ But sure, the whole world is wrong. You're the only right one LMAO HAHAHAhAHAHAHAHASASA
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 06:45 PM
0

Honestly, your arguments have been about as expected of a feminist. Delusional, and without proof. https://www.britannica.com/topic/feminism
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 06:42 PM
1

jpost??? LMAOOOO HAHAHAH
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 06:39 PM
0

LMAOOOO your only defense is saying, it's incorrect. No proof, no evidence. Bruh, I actually thought some people here had good enough arguments, you're kind of embarrassing the rest of them. I'd suggest you don't speak on their behalf anymore
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 06:38 PM
1

I proved that feminism isn't about equality, LMAOooo when? Did I fall asleep?
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 06:37 PM
1

Holy shit! LMAOOOOOOO I linked the literal encyclopaedia brittanica lmaooooooo
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 06:36 PM
3

So before I respond to this, you agree, saying "feminism is bad because it only supports women's rights" is not an accurate or true statement?
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 06:35 PM
1

That's all? You failed to prove your claim, failed to prove the source wrong and immediately turn tail? I expected more but ok
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 06:34 PM
1

You linked an incorrect definition, that's it. Ey buddy, listen. If you can prove the fact-checked, maintained and expert authored entry, do so. I've been waiting a long while. I find delusion funny. Nice! You must get a nice laugh in the mirror everyday. That's good. Laughter's good for the soul
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 06:28 PM
1

So ucnertainty is undefined or infinite for unlimited distributions? Or do you want to change the definition for unlimited distributions? Do you not realize how stupid you sound? No I said this is a limited distribution. ​ Also that's a lot of screen space to waste. Thanks for exercising my scrolling finger I guess
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 06:21 PM
1

You did not. You linked a blog news site, and a site that I showed to be false. ​ It's funny how you think you have any hard evidence or basic fact, but keep living in delusion. Yeah, except I linked credible sources. You should check them out, I mean you do find facts funny right
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 06:19 PM
1

That's my point, feminism defends women's rights, MRM defends men's rights. You can't claim feminism is bad for only defending women's rights, while MRM is good despite only defending men's rights. That right there is a double standard
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 06:16 PM
-5

Lmao, I never said I'm here to learn. I'm quite literally here to debate, defend my position and require the same from you. If you are unable to do that, no worries at all my guy. You do you. I never said prove MRM is an infallible movement, and myself in fact advocate for men's rights. I asked you a specific question you failed to answer, showing a double standard i.e MRM good, feminism bad. ​ It's clear that you still get super defensive to our responses which is a clear sign that you still fa…
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 06:13 PM
1

Already did. Nope, but ok Lmao thanks for another laugh. You're welcome :) I had no idea hard evidence and basic fact was something you found funny, but try checking out an encyclopaedia. It'll have you in stitches
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 06:10 PM
1

Even the most trusted encyclopedia gets it wrong unfortunately. Like they do here. Ah yes, the most trusted repository of information in the world, where each entry is fact checked and reviewed by experts in the field vs No-Satisfaction's : trust me bro. Geeee, I wonder who I should trust? Such a difficult dilemma. However will I solve it?? ​ LOL thanks for the laugh. You're the one saying feminism is for equality yet I'm the one spreading misinformation. 😂 Says the person unable to provide a so…
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 06:03 PM
-4

Alright, if you are unable to back up your claims no problem
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 06:00 PM
-5

I didn't ask if men opposed the scotus ruling. By doing so they showed feminist support, i.e supporting a woman's right to choose. I'm asking, when did men's rights activists get together and say, let's fight for women's rights. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/activists-join-chorus-against-gender-neutral-rape-laws/articleshow/18840879.cms That is a demonstrably false article. No sources, no references, and the person they quoted, Seema Meeshra, literally never said that. It is a cumrag…
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 05:56 PM
0

You're a Jordan Peterson fanboy because you put stock in hypergamy as a concept.
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 05:47 PM
1

No, I said this is a limited distribution. That is all. And no, I'm not red herringing my way out of anything. The fact remains, you have a giant list of indefensible claims, and your sticking point is somehow the mathematical definition of uncertainty. Which I gave. I'll say it again, your statistical analysis was dog shit and remains dog shit
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 05:46 PM
-6

The thing is, you can argue against the methods feminists use, you can argue about the best way of resolving gender based differences in opportunity, but this sub is antifeminist as a whole. Where feminism's goal is to achieve equality in areas where women are oppressed, being against the ideology is to be against them attaining said equality. Which lends to misogyny
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 05:42 PM
-8

Do Men's Rights activists fight for women's rights? Also feminism has never fought against making rape laws gender neutral
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 05:38 PM
-3

She literally has critics. You are criticizing her. I'm criticizing her. People on the tiktok page are criticizing her. So again, what does this have to do with feminism
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 05:29 PM
-6

Lmao, once you see someone unironically use hypergamy as a talking point, you know you're talking to a Jordan Peterson fanboy. To clarify, I'm not endorsing your stance on hypergamy at all, but based on Jordan Peterson's claims, hypergamy is at a far lower rate today than in the past.
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 05:17 PM
1

Buddy I have a literal list of the things you failed to reply to Nice try at the Rick roll btw
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 05:12 PM
-6

What does this have to do with feminism?
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 04:45 PM
1

non limited distributions the "uncertainty" would be infinite since they have a non zero probability of having pretty much any value. This is a limited distribution, but besides the point again. The fact remains, uncertainty in collection of the data remains, and was further compounded in your shitty analysis, one of things you did not consider in the multiple steps you took to arrive at your conclusion
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 04:44 PM
1

Do you have difficulty understanding. The difference between simply claiming that you're "democratic" and being democratic is evidence of your claim. The source I listed provides evidence for said claim. Do you understand the difference between the 2? Imagine putting britannica as a actual helpful source lol. Holy shit! Thanks for making me laugh. The Encyclopaedia Brittanica is the world's most trusted encyclopedia and has lasted 300 years based on that academic trust. It is objectively hilario…
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 04:28 PM
1

I already defined uncertainty for you
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 04:13 PM
-8

80% of the posts here are literally "Woman Bad"
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 04:02 PM
1

False equivalencies. The ever helpful source I listed also provides a historical record, as well as current efforts made by feminism for the sake of equality. Feel free to read the actual source. It's not an anonymous website quoting non-existent people for made up stories. It's factual, history based and maintained by transparent scholars. You asked for a source, I provided one. Whereas I'm still waiting on a source for your ridiculous claims
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 04:00 PM
1

Can I just say I love the youtube clip. I'm always expecting something different and it's always the same! It's a perfect reminder. And I said what I said. You determining the STD was useless and irrelevant. Why did you do it Mr. Statistician?
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 02:45 PM
1

Buddy, I said I'll get to you later. What I said still stands however, standard deviation is irrelevant and not usable for estimating measurement uncertainty in a dataset of binary variables. And I'll say I honestly can't believe a teacher of information theory needs this explained to them. In the meantime I'll say , thanks for spending your points on silver for me :)
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 01:18 PM
1

I already got a silver from you :) ​ Still waiting on gold though :(
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 12:51 PM
0

"Feminism is all about ensuring equal opportunity." That's quite literally the definition of feminism. I was unaware the denizens of this sub didn't know what they were fighting against, but I'll help you look it up. The encyclopoedia brittanica: https://www.britannica.com/topic/feminism I do actually, and I've showed it, unlike you Lmao no you didn't. You showed a sourceless, demonstrably lying cumrag as the source of your beliefs.
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 09:34 AM
0

Buddy, I didn't make the claim. That was you. If you have no source, no evidence, then you're just espousing your subjective viewpoint, and as such it is not only dismissable, but requires such dismissal. ​ You might want to checks notes again. Seems you took them down wrong
/r/AntiFeminists18/07/22 09:29 AM
0

Not at all. The proof is the actual articles linked. No sources listed, and the people quoted don't appear anywhere else. Get better sources
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 09:11 PM
0

No I proved your "source" as bad. Get a better one, or prove it to be good
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 06:58 PM
0

What a fantastic argument. It might explain why so many look down this sub
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 06:56 PM
1

Go for it then
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 02:14 PM
0

Except I did mathematically define my position. I have responded to all your questions and accusations despite the fact you have huuuuuuuuuuuge list of undefended and fundamentally wrong claims
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 02:06 PM
1

I'll get back to you when I have the time and energy to delve back into math. ​ In the meantime, feel free to respond to any of the items on your list
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 01:58 PM
1

As a parting gift, here's a list of things you failed to defend: ​ Feminism causes worse mental health for women. Disproved. Your claim of egalitarianism with zero effort to make things better for women. Your claim that feminism is bad because it only supports women, whilst simultaneously being a staunch supporter of Men's Rights. Disproving the ADJUSTED pay gap Failing to provide a single example of something women can't do that man can despite your claim. Claiming that feminism advocates for u…
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 01:56 PM
1

As a parting gift, here's a list of things you failed to defend: ​ Feminism causes worse mental health for women. Disproved. Your claim of egalitarianism with zero effort to make things better for women. Your claim that feminism is bad because it only supports women, whilst simultaneously being a staunch supporter of Men's Rights. Disproving the ADJUSTED pay gap Failing to provide a single example of something women can't do that man can despite your claim. Claiming that feminism advocates for u…
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 01:55 PM
0

Send more silver, maybe it'll help :)
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 01:46 PM
1

Give one example of feminism campaigning against men's rights. Holy shit. You love to try squirm away don't you
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 01:45 PM
1

Answer this, if you could pay women less, why hire men at all? Irrelevant. Disprove the claim you said you could Equality of opportunity, its not that complex. What a fucking non-answer. Answer the god-damn question. What steps do you advocate for to provide equality of opportunity.
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 01:44 PM
0

I'll get to you buddy. Wait your turn
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 01:41 PM
0

I asked for a single example One One example
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 01:41 PM
1

I specifically asked you what steps you advocate for as an egalitarian in reducing the gender disparity in several fields. Besides the laundry list of unfounded claims you have had disproved in our conversation, you keep failing at this extraordinarily basic request. ​ ​ This is unadjusted pay gap. That's not a pay gap. For your perusal Yes, that is 100% true. Hence the differences in pay. On average, women choose to pursue a family as supposed a career. They also work lower paid, less dangerous…
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 01:40 PM
0

You can't disprove the existence of something. Prove to me the wage gap does exist, and I'll disprove everything you can come up with. Voici Before you try disproving that, I specifically asked you what steps you advocate for as an egalitarian in reducing the gender disparity in several fields. You have not responded Am I surprised you are jumping to conclusions? Not really. Lmao, you literally said that women cannot do everything a man can because of neurological differences. I'm not jumping to…
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 01:18 PM
1

Correct. The key difference is that feminism does not just fight for women's rights, it actively campaigns against men's rights. It does not. Give a single example of feminism fighting against men's rights. You consistently make claims with nothing to back it up And I will state, because again you are trying to weasel out of your flawed logic being demonstrated. You said specifically that feminism is bad because it only deals with women's issues. You're tacking on qualifiers only now after your …
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 01:01 PM
1

So just to clarify, your logic is: Feminism is bad because while it fights for disproportionate issues affecting women, it only fights for women. Meanwhile, mens rights is good because it fights for disproportionate issues for men. The cognitive dissonance must be terrible for you! Shame The problem is that feminism is rampant, so MRA's are seen as "evil" because feminists are afraid of their carefully crafted gynocentric world order being balanced. Again, you have made a subjective claim
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 12:55 PM
-1

What steps. I asked that specifically No, because the wage gap has been proven false countless times. This is a blatantly false statement, provide sources. As a counter source, consider, you guessed it! SWEDEN. They've taken actual measures against the wage gap and have had measurable results. If they are good enough, yes. Not just for the sake of it You believe you need to specify this with women? It kind of reveals your bias with women there
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 12:33 PM
1

Oh darling, have you ever tried to debate in feminazi subreddits? Oh darling, I'm talking to YOU. And you have no defense, no facts and no logic in that particular defense. Stop trying to deflect, I'm talking to YOU. It only addresses women's issues. Just like Men's Rights?
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 12:31 PM
0

So then, just to confirm, you as an egalitarian, are in favor of taking steps to reduce the wage gap? You're in favor of taking steps to bring more women into STEM fields? You're in favor on taking steps to bring more women into government? You're in favor of campaigning against women being made submissive the family? ​ If yes, what steps should be taken?
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 12:27 PM
1

I'm just gonna ignore your repeated points, it's just boring now. Of course. The old I can't respond, I have failed to respond multiple times, my arguments have no actual substance, so I'm going to claim this is boring. You've proved me right. And no, I don't want feminists to solve my problems, I don't want feminism to exist at all. Then who do you want to solve women's problems?
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 12:19 PM
1

Ahahahahahahahahahaahahahahhahahahaha! Oh, you're serious? ​ Again, you gotta love this form of debate! No facts, no logic, no defense. Truly beautiful, and can only be found on this sub ​ Yes, thank you for proving my point. It only addresses female injustices. It doesn't fight for equality. If it did, it would be egalitarianism. Yes feminism addresses women's issues. I'm so confused here. That's it's goal. Like did you have some sort of trouble understanding this? At the same time, it is not a…
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 12:18 PM
1

Yeah.. no. Think what you want, I know that male mental health is consistently ignored, and has become worse due to feminism pushing its way into making women the victims of everything. Buddy you said something, were proved wrong and immediately shifted goalposts. I'll address what you said once you adress the fact that feminism has demonstrably led to improved health for women. THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT YOU SAID. Lmao I love watching you all squirm and try to ignore being thoroughly proved wrong, it…
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 12:13 PM
1

Congrats, a notoriously socially liberal country introduces military draft for women. That doesn't prove your point. When have feminists ever campaigned for this to be compulsory everywhere? It's quite the opposite, they campaign for no draft for women at all. Yes all that's true. It's also a FEMINIST country. And their draft is bi-gender. It absolutely proves my point. The feminist policies have ensured equal opportunity for representation in ALL fields. That's what campaigns for equal represen…
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 12:04 PM
-1

Holy shit. I love when you all bring up timesofindia and jpost as legitimate sources. It's actually hilarious. These cumrags claiming to be news sites never list sources, never have references, and the slightest bit of research reveals the "people" they quote a) don't exist or b) never said anything like they claim. Try harder with actual sources lmao
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 12:01 PM
1

Yeah, I ignore them because in those countries men's mental health is consistently not as good. Lmao no buddy, you don't get to squirm out of being proved wrong. What you just said is, while also wrong, completely irrelevant. Your initial claim was that feminism leads to worse mental health for women. When it has been demonstrated that the opposite is true. Take your L. Entirely misinterpreted my point. I dont think "plus sized" should be celebrated and promoted at all, but if it is, why is it o…
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 11:46 AM
1

You're just allergic to clearly defining your position aren't you? What DO YOU MEAN BY DELTA? Because buddy, if u mean change or difference like delta usually means it isn't easy to prove u wrong, ** IT'S TRIVIAL. ** In a thread about uncertainty, you're not sure what I'm referring to when I state ΔX? Ok Mr. "You're talking to a statistician" ΔX can be used to refer to uncertainty. Namely the range of values X could potentially lie in due to errors in measuring. So any function of X and Y that p…
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 11:29 AM
1

So in a threaf specifically about uncertainty, you need clarification of what uncertainty is? It's fine if you don't recognise delta X, but there you delta is uncertainty and f(X, Y) is any function if X and Y used to produce a statistically significant analysis of X and Y
/r/AntiFeminists17/07/22 10:57 AM
0

Not at all, you don't seem to understand uncertainty at all. Hence you bringing up standard deviation and variance. The mathematical notation of my claim, and I'm not sure why you needed it, when I stated it quite clearly. ​ Δ f(X, Y) >= MAX(ΔX, ΔY) Feel free to try prove it wrong. Again, please refer to the "children's website" if you need any clarification. So since you don't know the difference between standard deviation, and uncertainty, you claim to be in information theory. I ask again: WH…
/r/AntiFeminists16/07/22 11:31 PM
1

Feminism is all about ensuring equal opportunity. That is it's very core. ​ Where is the equality crowd when it comes to military drafts? Hey buddy, take a look at Sweden again. Military draft for men was ended, and then when brought back included women as well ​ It's almost as if somebody arguing not objectively can't account for basic facts
/r/AntiFeminists16/07/22 11:54 AM
3

Asked for 2 different examples, you failed to give any. Could not account for countries with feminist policies performing better in mental health for women, so just ignored them Complains feminism promotes unattainable standards, then points out plus sized women on billboards as a result of feminism. Admits to arguing based on a subjective viewpoint. This renders your entire argument baseless as well Subjective or not, what role models are talked about most? Celebrities with more money than sens…
/r/AntiFeminists16/07/22 11:51 AM
1

Not slightly! Entirely subjective. Your entire statement here was based on your viewpoint. That's the definition of subjective. I find it very interesting that someone claiming to be an egalitarian believes wholeheartedly in treating people of different genders differently.
/r/AntiFeminists16/07/22 11:47 AM
-12

This is hilarious. I figured you should know that
/r/AntiFeminists16/07/22 11:42 AM
0

Instead of the US, sure, let's use the rest of the world. The comparison still stands. And as such your entire argument falls flat. Still I will answer to the rest of your points which are at this point, irrelevant. ​ Feminism has caused countless men and women to feel like they aren't good enough, because it gives the spotlight to people who are "role models" who - 9 times out of 10 - are rich celebs who never had to work for anything. You are spouting ideas based on your subjective viewpoint. …
/r/AntiFeminists16/07/22 11:36 AM
-5

The only thing he's spreading is logic based on biased subjective viewpoint. Which, shocker, turns out to be false more often than not.
/r/AntiFeminists16/07/22 11:26 AM
-5

What? Feminism is not responsible for the entire generation of young girls never feeling good enough. To prove that you simply need to look at a country that has implemented feminist policies e.g Sweden. The happiness index for women is far higher than the US and it has steadily increased ever since the implementation of feminist policies. Women feeling not good enough is quite literally what feminism is fighting.
/r/AntiFeminists16/07/22 11:20 AM
-17

No, pressure on you to be good at everything made your life worse. Not feminism
/r/AntiFeminists16/07/22 11:13 AM
-18

The point of feminism is you get to choose what you want. If you don't want to be independent, feminism allows you to make that choice. And nowhere does feminism make the claim that all women are good at everything. Feminism states that each woman is considered as an individual
/r/AntiFeminists16/07/22 11:09 AM
0

Then no. This not what I meant at all. That should be very obvious and the calculation of uncertainty is trivial. Standard deviation and variance are not part of this at all. It was explained very well on that kids website :) So again: WHY DID YOU LIE ABOUT BEING A STATISTICIAN?
/r/AntiFeminists16/07/22 07:10 AM
5

I have a slightly different idea. How about you don't adopt these mantras as your own?
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 10:02 PM
1

DO YOU CONFIRM YOU INTEND THE SIGMA OF A RANDOM VARIABLE WITH UNCERTAINTY? THIS IS CLEARLY DEFINED AS sigma(X)=sqrt(Var[X]). Is then a fair mathematical representation of your statement "ERROR ALWAYS COMPOUNDS" AS THE STATEMENT: Let X,Y be random variables. Let Z=ƒ(X,Y). Sigma[Z] >= Max(Sigma[X],Sigma[Y]) ∀ X,Y,ƒ(X,Y). I genuinely love this!!! I'm now fully convinced that not only did you lie about being a statistician, you also lied about teaching information theory!!!! This is a fantastic way …
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 09:33 PM
0

So then by your definition, and mine as well, there was no brain washing going on here?
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 05:19 PM
0

I never mentioned anything to with weirdness. So, what are the lies shown in the video?
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 05:11 PM
1

So now it's not about lying anymore. The issue is whether you teach them about problems adults will face? Discussing that is brainwashing?
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 05:06 PM
1

Ok looks like you'll further lie on that. You are not a statistician. Let's disregard the fact that Information Theory does not delve deeply into statistics at all and your misunderstanding of uncertainty. That's proof enough of your bad faith. Now onto whether uncertainty always compounds, here's some math you should have learned at 17. They even have nice drawings for you :) ​ https://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=2661762 ​ Now onto the next list item. ​ ​ IF YOU TEACH INFORMATION …
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 04:34 PM
0

That's a lot of words that don't answer the question. WHY DID YOU LIE THAT YOU'RE A STATISTICIAN WHEN YOU'RE NOT? Literally everything else will be addressed after that
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 02:32 PM
1

I'll get to all of that. ​ ONCE YOU ANSWER: WHY DID YOU LIE THAT YOU'RE A STATISTICIAN WHEN YOU'RE NOT?
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 01:01 PM
1

So the difference between brainwashing and teaching is whether it involves lies? Fair enough. I can agree with that. What lies were shown in the video?
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 12:08 PM
-2

Again, just to clarify. You teaching antifeminist rhetoric to children is NOT brainwashing?
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 12:01 PM
2

This is kinda telling on yourself
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 11:38 AM
1

I will but I've decided to go through the list first: ​ ​ WHY DID YOU LIE THAT YOU'RE A STATISTICIAN WHEN YOU'RE NOT?
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 11:20 AM
0

YOUR LIST HAS GROWN TOO BIG!!! I'M RUNNING OUT OF MEMORY!! YOU CANNOT DEFEND YOUR LIES AND IT IS EVIDENT!! Do you have difficulty reading? I'll spell it out for you again. For the 4th time. ​ I. explained. to. you. that. error. in. the. conversation. equaled. uncertainty. ​ You are attempting to prove (incorrectly I might add) something I do not care about and is irrelevant to the topic. ​ I see no need to explain that you picked a random values, simply because they meets a condition required fo…
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 11:07 AM
1

You claimed and have not retracted that uncertainty "Sometimes compounds" And "Can compensate for each other" (This adds more credence to the idea you really have no idea what you are talking about) You make no response to being called out for lying about your position. . you are unable to respond to the 2 example variables You make no response to how your "defense" proves my point instead of yours You are unable to respond the fact that your accusations were unfounded and prove baseless You hav…
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 10:54 AM
-3

This quickly devolved out of the topic of discussion. I'm asking why when someone else teaches their values to their children, you label it brainwashing. But with you doing the exact same it's good old teaching them values
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 10:37 AM
1

Firstly, where's the insults? :( I said I wanted better ones, can't you provide? ​ PROVE IT. STOP YOUR BLA BLA BLA AND PROVE THE TWO ERRORS DO NOT COMPENSATE. DON'T PUT IN OTHER BULLSHIT. I MADE THIS CLAIM SPECIFICALLY: THE ERRORS COMPENSARE: U SPECIFICALLY CALLED ME OUT SAYING U CAN'T SAY TWO ERRORS COMPENSATE. WELL? I'M WAITING. I already responded to you here ​ The disequation is valid as long as the numbers are positive and eT << T. You're showing your inability to understand again. Represen…
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 10:20 AM
0

But u never read wtf i type u also ignored the other comment cuz it wastoo long ass i guess and it disproves ur "ERROR ALWAYS COMPOUNDS"bullshit despite the fact that u can't fucking define error. Already explained this in my most recent comment ​ And like i said, information theory isn't basics of programming moron.It's fucking theory of information. Evaluating information from events,Shannon's limit theorem etc... Thereby proving your ignorance of coding and making my point for me thanks. It's…
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 09:51 AM
1

Aight so, pack yer things, nothing to see here then? Thank God there are smarter people than you or we'd still be living in caves. So we know True cases but some of the true are actually misclassified so we have T + eT. Likewise we know a number of cases are false but some of them are misclassified. So we know the quantity F+ eF. Say you want to guess how many True to False allegations there are. I.E. True / False. So far ok class? You follow? You don't know neither T nor F but we can say someth…
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 09:47 AM
0

No I said writing a script for such basic one time operations is so ridiculous it's laughable. And lo and behold I was proven right. Because that's not a script. And you don't know the difference. Which gives further evidence you are not a "teacher of information theory" and are at best a beginning student.
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 09:24 AM
1

This is visual proof that you're wrong. That's not a script. It's 3 operations typed directly into the terminal. This is why I suspect you're not actually a teacher but a new student.
/r/AntiFeminists15/07/22 09:06 AM
-4

That moment when kids have the same thinking capacity as antifeminists...
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 10:42 PM
-3

Would you also consider talking with your children about antifeminist ideals brainwashing?
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 10:41 PM
-3

L was kicked out of his room? You didn't specify that. Was he kicked out of his room, or was he kicked out C's room? She broke up with him before fixing any problems in the relationship She had no romantic feelings for L? Why would she want fix a relationship for someone she has no feelings for? Would you want to have a girlfriend who doesn't care about you romantically? just to fuck some other guy she barely knows She should not be allowed to have sex with her new boyfriend? Also you don't know…
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 09:45 PM
1

You claimed and have not retracted that uncertainty "Sometimes compounds" And "Can compensate for each other" (This adds more credence to the idea you really have no idea what you are talking about) You make no response to being called out for lying about your position. . you are unable to respond to the 2 example variables You make no response to how your "defense" proves my point instead of yours You are unable to respond the fact that your accusations were unfounded and prove baseless You hav…
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 09:29 PM
1

You claimed and have not retracted that uncertainty "Sometimes compounds" And "Can compensate for each other" (This adds more credence to the idea you really have no idea what you are talking about) You make no response to being called out for lying about your position. . you are unable to respond to the 2 example variables You make no response to how your "defense" proves my point instead of yours You are unable to respond the fact that your accusations were unfounded and prove baseless You hav…
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 08:00 PM
1

They were just questioning if you like having sex with animals. They didn't suggest it at all
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 06:18 PM
-1

I'm confused. They are not married. She fell out of love with him. What does she owe him? Should she pretend to still be in love with him? ​ And what does this have to do with feminism?
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 02:40 PM
0

You claimed and have not retracted that uncertainty "Sometimes compounds" And "Can compensate for each other" You make no response to being called out for lying about your position. . you are unable to respond to the 2 example variables You make no response to how your "defense" proves my point instead of yours You are unable to respond the fact that your accusations were unfounded and prove baseless You have been demonstrated to argue in bad faith based on your 10% comment. The Anger is perfect…
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 02:32 PM
0

You make no response to being called out for lying about your position. . you are unable to respond to the 2 example variables You make no response to how your "defense" proves my point instead of yours You are unable to respond the fact that your accusations were unfounded and prove baseless You have been demonstrated to argue in bad faith based on your 10% comment. Fine let's call it uncertainty. If you need to argue semantics then I feel you have no argument. But sure let's go with uncertaint…
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 02:13 PM
0

Holy shit this explains so much. Errors don't compensate, they compound at each step of analysis. This is further evidence you're NOT a statistician and have no understanding of the field. Your analysis is incredibly shit I note you make no response to being called out for lying about your position. . I note how you are unable to respond to the 2 example variables I note you make no response to how your "defense" proves my point instead of yours I note how you ignored the fact that your accusati…
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 09:29 AM
1

What percentage are you using to determine unfounded results? I'll answer for you since it seems you have some difficulty here. 2 to 8%. This is an individual factor that makes up part of the 12 to 18%. Any errors are compounded from individual factors. Hence your analysis is shit I note you make no response to being called out for lying about your position. . I note how you are unable to respond to the 2 example variables I note you make no response to how your "defense" proves my point instead…
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 09:21 AM
1

I note you make no response to being called out for lying about your position. . I note you make no response to how your "defense" proves my point instead of yours You would use 2 to 8% of a specifically selected segment of sampled set to make estimations on the rest of the the other samples that are specifically labelled undefined? I I note how you ignored the fact that your accusations were unfounded and prove baseless I note how you ignored that you have been demonstrated to argue in bad fait…
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 09:19 AM
1

I note you make no response to being called out for lying about your position. . I note how you are unable to respond to the 2 example variables I note you make no response to how your "defense" proves my point instead of yours You would use 2 to 8% of a specifically selected segment of sampled set to make estimations on the rest of the the other samples that are specifically labelled undefined? I I note how you ignored the fact that your accusations were unfounded and prove baseless I note how …
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 09:17 AM
1

I note you make no response to being called out for lying about your position. . I note how you are unable to respond to the 2 example variables I note you make no response to how your "defense" proves my point instead of yours I note how you ignored the fact that your accusations were unfounded and prove baseless I note how you ignored that you have been demonstrated to argue in bad faith based on your 10% comment And they specify it includes cases which were closed by law enforcement without d…
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 09:16 AM
1

I note you make no response to being called out for lying about your position. . I note how you are unable to respond to the 2 example variables You would use 2 to 8% of a specifically selected segment of sampled set to make estimations on the rest of the the other samples that are specifically labelled undefined? I I note how you ignored the fact that your accusations were unfounded and prove baseless I note how you ignored that you have been demonstrated to argue in bad faith based on your 10%…
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 09:14 AM
1

I note you make no response to being called out for lying about your position. . I note you make no response to how your "defense" proves my point instead of yours You would use 2 to 8% of a specifically selected segment of sampled set to make estimations on the rest of the the other samples that are specifically labelled undefined? I I note how you ignored the fact that your accusations were unfounded and prove baseless I note how you ignored that you have been demonstrated to argue in bad fait…
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 09:13 AM
1

I note how you are unable to respond to the 2 example variables I note you make no response to how your "defense" proves my point instead of yours You would use 2 to 8% of a specifically selected segment of sampled set to make estimations on the rest of the the other samples that are specifically labelled undefined? I I note how you ignored the fact that your accusations were unfounded and prove baseless I note how you ignored that you have been demonstrated to argue in bad faith based on your 1…
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 09:10 AM
0

I note you make no response to being called out for lying about your position. . I note how you are unable to respond to the 2 example variables I note you make no response to how your "defense" proves my point instead of yours You would use 2 to 8% of a specifically selected segment of sampled set to make estimations on the rest of the the other samples that are specifically labelled undefined? I I note how you ignored the fact that your accusations were unfounded and prove baseless I note how …
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 08:55 AM
0

The definition is included in a study, and is not limited to a dictionary definition of the word. Looking up the dictionary definition makes no point for you. I note you make no response to being called out for lying about your position. I'm not sure why I would expect someone who lies about what he does to have any moral compass. Guess I'm not getting that apology. At least the fact the accusation comes from an unreliable source with little to no morals is evident. I gave no source because none…
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 08:47 AM
0

I note you make no response to being called out for lying about your position. I'm not sure why I would expect someone who lies about what he does to have any moral compass. Guess I'm not getting that apology. At least the fact the accusation comes from an unreliable source with little to no morals is evident. I gave no source because none is required. The covariance self evident. Your statistical analysis is shit. I note how you are unable to respond to them. I didn't say I'm a data scientist, …
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 08:36 AM
0

The definition of unfounded is included in the comment. Read it again. Kind of weird how you didn't see that but ok Your 'defense' of unfounded claims makes a clear requirement. That unfounded claims be listed separately from false allegations. That was not done and until it is your very defender states and I quote: "Uncertainty of how strict and to what extent the new guidelines arefollowed by law enforcement agencies will never be fully dispelled." I claimed the highest stat ever stated was 8%…
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 07:32 AM
0

The article you linked gave some very important caveats namely only legal court ordered DNA tests were used. Peace of mind DNA tests were not considered. It even cited another study that took into consideration some of the outstanding factors and the rate dropped drastically to 1 in 25. Not quite the same, or the definition of common. You have about as much chance as dying from COVID
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 02:14 AM
0

You are a special one aren't you. I have no idea who you are, but I bet I could make some guesses. Let's say not about you but about John. John has become disillusioned with women since his wife left him and took the kids. Growing increasingly bitter since then at the unfair amount of child support/alimony he has to pay, John has decided not to be "a good guy" anymore. After all, that's what all the YouTube videos say he needs to do to control women. To his dismay, he finds that women find him a…
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 01:52 AM
1

Sure you are
/r/AntiFeminists14/07/22 12:02 AM
2

Holy shit I love this sub!! According to you all, I'm a garbage human for asking for actual facts. You gotta love it
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 11:50 PM
0

It keeps going!! I love it
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 10:30 PM
0

Yaaaaay! He's done it again! :) Thank you
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 10:26 PM
-1

So no actual statistics or evidence? Just your viewpoint? From this perspective you must be swimming in women
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 09:55 PM
1

Your title indicates you believe women should be submissive to men?
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 09:50 PM
-2

Lol where do you get this idea from
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 09:48 PM
-1

Where are the stats?
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 09:46 PM
-6

How close were you following this lady?
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 09:44 PM
0

You've stopped calling me lady :( This is a sad day
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 09:31 PM
0

Buddy, a guy who is so convinced in his ability to judge gender off of reading a comment is objectively funny. Keep doing it. You seem to have skipped calling me a lady in your last comment and that made me sad. I didn't get my little laugh
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 07:52 PM
0

Rates of false accusation are sometimes inflated or misrepresented due to conflation with terms such as unfounded. These designations, which allow law enforcement to close cases without arriving at a conclusion, are used to describe reports without enough evidence, as opposed to cases where the accuser is not credible or says that the account is untrue. That is the comment on unfounded rape accusations. You're welcome for quoting it even though I told you where to find it. Expecially since you h…
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 07:41 PM
0

Lmao, ok buddy. I'll believe you when you provide evidence. I also find it hilarious that you somehow think calling me a lady is somehow some sort of insult? I might have been mad if it wasn't so funny. You keep doing that, it actually makes my day a little brighter, so thanks I guess.
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 06:50 PM
0

The article you listed literally confirmed what I said. Either a court order or consent from the father is required as part of the documentation. The state is not legally allowed to just put a guy's name. I cannot stress this enough. And a court order is not trivial. Your comprehension skills are on par with your ability to determine gender through the internet. Non-existent
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 05:26 PM
0

Cope
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 05:09 PM
0

https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/adding-a-father-to-a-birth-certificate-in-washington.html I'm not sure why you're incapable of the slightest bit of research. But guess you need a "woman" to do it for you
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 05:08 PM
0

Well then I'm sorry it's not as easy as you thought it was. Because you're completely wrong
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 05:03 PM
1

I'll give you a simple exercise. Can you spot the difference in sentence construction between the stated example and the the quote in question? If you are able to, you might spot the difference between "if not" being used as a conditional statement and it being used as way of conceding a point that would have been assumed based on the initial part of the statement
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 03:40 PM
0

Buddy, I'd strongly suggest you show this to your English teacher and ask for clarification. No matter how wrong you are you won't accept any correction from me because your ego is at stake
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 02:51 PM
0

My skill or your skill does not change the facts. The author said something. You misinterpreted it. You got salty. You accused others of being unable to read while you failed to write. That's objectively funny so I'm not even mad
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 01:22 PM
0

The FBI clearly defines unfounded and how it is used in collecting the data. Look it up. A guilty verdict in a criminal trial is only given in the case where the state proves beyond a reasonable doubt. The documentation also gives reasons on why it is difficult to prove a majority of the cases difficult. A not guilty verdict does not mean the person did not commit the crime. Do a bit of reading on: How the criminal justice system works The method of collecting data Take the mean of 2-8 which is …
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 01:21 PM
0

Frankly I don't care about the letter. I just found it ironic. However you completely failed in understanding a simple statement. Then proceeded to berate others based on that lack of comprehension
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 01:11 PM
0

Absolutely not, If not a numerical minority is concession on part of the author. In effect, the author states "I concede that they are not the numerical minority, HOWEVER, they are the social minority." I would strongly suggest you broaden your understanding of how the English language works before insulting other peoples comprehension thereof
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 01:09 PM
0

I had no idea I was talking to stylometric expert. Fascinating. Where did you do your training
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 01:06 PM
0

Nope.
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 01:06 PM
1

You don't have a very much understanding of how critical thinking works do you?
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 01:04 PM
0

Or the secret 3rd option. You're incredibly uninformed
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 01:04 PM
0

That kind of makes the point even more. Throwing accusations of illiteracy in a language that, by your own admission, you're not as skilled in
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 12:14 PM
0

Not quite, I find it weird an entire group that can't understand a quite simple literary concept accuse others of illiteracy
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 12:02 PM
-1

Literally looked through the FBIs data on the topic and the highest possible percentage was 8% unfounded. Which does not mean false rape allegation by default.
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 09:20 AM
-1

Where did you get that figure for false rape accusations?
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 07:39 AM
0

Ok buddy
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 07:35 AM
0

I find this incredibly hilarious. And it really shows how a large portion of this sub is. So convinced with zero evidence. And so wrong.
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 07:34 AM
0

I'd highly suggest you actually do a tiny bit of research
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 07:32 AM
0

I gave enough context. Your only comment in response to me before the one above.
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 10:26 PM
1

OK?
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 10:25 PM
0

Well then you need to get better deduction skills lmao
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 10:25 PM
0

Holy shit. This is hilarious and quite frankly a wonderful insight in to how your collective mind works. No paternity can only be established after a forcible court order for a DNA test. This court order can only be given in very specific circumstances. The only other option is father's consent. To simply write your name without consent would render the document invalid. Also I am a guy. But try again Check your quotas ideas and confirm with any statistical evidence thank you. Women does not equ…
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 10:23 PM
1

Thanks for the advice, I have already read both
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 05:41 PM
1

True, both are possible. But I somehow doubt some hypothetical situation would be what finally made your argument for you. I will also note you have entirely skipped over a large portion of arguments and points while I have responded to each and every single one you have raised. ​ All the best
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 05:24 PM
1

I am not going to lie. Language may be a barrier here because I cannot understand what you're saying at all. I've really tried to understand it, but I can't get your hypotheticals at all
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 04:22 PM
0

Holy shit you need someone to verify I'm a guy. LMAOOOO Also I can't respond to your other comment so I'll do it here. What does that have to with feminism
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 04:19 PM
1

Firstly I have noted you are still ignoring the facts I have given you. You also seem to have weirdly responded to the hard data. And lastly no, I am not assuming anything. I'm drawing conclusions from available facts. Nazis in Ukraine make a tiny minority. Probably something like 0.2%. It would be crazy to use such minor representation to make an assumption. ​ As opposed to women, who have far smaller representation in EVERY single position of authority. ​ To compare the 2 is a false equivalenc…
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 02:31 PM
1

Buddy, I just told you I read them. You can stop now if you have nothing else to add
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 01:29 PM
1

I did, and responded with those facts. So again thanks. You don't need to say anything more
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 01:28 PM
1

Contraire mon frere. All the evidence is here. When confronted with basic facts, you refused to engage those facts. That's all I need thanks
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 01:26 PM
1

Lol I made my arguments very clear. You have been unable to respond or engage. I am free to draw my own conclusions from that, thank you very much.
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 01:24 PM
1

Sure. Ok buddy
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 01:21 PM
1

Kind of curious how you still fail to explain the flaw in my thinking. It just might make someone think that you're full of shit.
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 01:19 PM
1

Ok Mr Brightguy. Explain to us poor dumb folk where it went wrong
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 01:14 PM
1

It's a false equivalency. ​ You claim assumptions, but I have given hard data which you still have yet to respond to
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 12:51 PM
1

What are you asking
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 12:25 PM
1

It is more representative, because a CEO position affects far more than a homeless position. You understand that right? 0.2% of homeless affects the 0.2% of the population The 0.007% of CEO positions affects almost the entirety of the population. The even smaller percentage of government positions affects 100% of the population! Crazy right. Do a little homeless test yourself once in a while I personally wouldn't care if the government was 90% women and 10% capybaras if they get their job done. …
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 12:22 PM
0

Murder is killing of a human. A fetus is not a human. You should look up definitions once in a while. Of course, sex is only reserved for the purpose of baby making. What a fantastic viewpoint. ​ Looking through your comment looks like you're a Christian (real Christ like in your comments btw) and the bible clearly states sex is also for enjoyment purposes. Similarly the priests were given explicit instructions on how to carry out abortions. If that's what you base your beliefs on your contradic…
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 11:48 AM
2

Lmao, I spoke extremely clearly. It's not my fault you had challenges reading and understanding what is an extremely simple statement
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 11:46 AM
1

Because if it represented reality without cherry picking it would mean "being homeless is a position of leader", which is lies. Holy shit, you've been stuck on this so many times, even though I've debunked this viewpoint so many times in this discussion, yet somehow you consistently just come back to this. Of course homeless men are oppressed. That has nothing to do with the conversation but I'll give additional facts. So simple facts Homelessness represents 0.2% of the population. It is NOT a f…
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 11:29 AM
-2

I thought incel behaviour was just a meme. But here we are
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 10:16 AM
1

I do not know. Regardless of whether it is a valid term or not, my criticism of OP still stands
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 10:13 AM
1

Yes, and the hypothetical situation from my example doesn't contradict it - men are not de facto leaders, but still are "by definition". I'll explain again slowly. Step by step because this concept seems to have confused you somewhat. Society grants man the position of leader Because of that rank they have been given by society, they are by definition superior Feminism tackles the first part. Stopping society from granting man position of leader. When that happens, man will no longer be by defin…
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 08:33 AM
1

Whether the term is fake or not, my criticism of OPs titles stands. He didn't understand the quote at all before criticising
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 06:51 AM
-1

I just answered you about how precautions regularly fail, and that's beside the point. Fetuses are not children. They have no sentience
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 06:50 AM
1

Note i specified sex 100 times per person. For each person there would be on average 3 failed condoms. Take a second, read it again then feel free to apologize
/r/AntiFeminists12/07/22 06:49 AM
0

Just like the pay gap merely adjusting for time off and other logical factors makes it more closer to 1.00 for men 95 cents for women. Link please? I do enjoy learning more. At least you admit there is a pay gap though, that's a huge improvement from you calling it a myth a few minutes ago. Your argument for the natural choice for women then injects society compelling them. I mean the literally natural desire for women to want certain things. And in Scandinavian countries where it is more egalit…
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 10:14 PM
2

What are you talking about? 3% should not be considered? Look at it this way. If the entire population has sex 100 times over the course of let's say a year, and they use condoms for protection. Close to a 100% of them will get pregnant within that period even if they didn't want to, and used protection. That's not some minor exception
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 09:56 PM
5

And what about this post has anything to do with feminism?
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 09:53 PM
2

The one where there are more women going to college, doing better in schools because they get more attention, more grant offerings? What a glorious misrepresentation of facts. Currently 39% of women have a 4 year college degree vs a 36% of men. Not much of a difference at all. Feel free to read more and educate yourself. Also men have more scholarships than women in sports fields, As for the rest the women specific scholarships make up less than 5% of overall scholarships. Or would pointing out …
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 09:51 PM
2

That's not how it works. You don't understand it. ​ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2940206/
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 09:33 PM
3

Woman do bad thing so feminism bad
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 09:05 PM
1

What a powerful representation of this sub. No facts, no figures. Just a feeling. It's truly amazing. Women make up 28% of the government, 8% of CEO positions in the Fortune 500 and men are seen as the head of the family in every single major religion. But who cares about that, you have the perfect counter. "Yeah but no" How powerful! How fantastic! What a truly unbeatable way to make your argument.
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 08:57 PM
-1

I love this take so much. People get so mad at the idea of women having sex.
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 08:03 PM
1

You do realize that even when properly used, condoms have a failure rate of 3%
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 08:02 PM
1

So look. Men are superior by definition. That means women need more rights/privileges/opportunities/advantage s. And no matter how many are given, it would never change. If hypothetically in 100 years women will own men as pets, the definition will still be the same - so women will still need more rights/privileges/opportunities/advantage. You almost had it and veered off completely into such a weird tangent. The goal of feminism is to change society so that men are not the de facto leaders. So …
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 07:28 PM
0

Read the sub description. Kind of sad really that you feel your safe space has been violated though
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 07:16 PM
1

men are always in position of power in comparison to women I literally never said this. I said in general, in society, in the home and in government, men hold the superior position. There are women who have far more power than you or I. The fact remains that women in general hold far less power overall than men
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 07:08 PM
1

What an amazing mindset. I'm actually impressed. Rarely do you meet someone so openly against hearing new ideas. Most people try to hide their desire for ignorance
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 07:06 PM
1

"Human male"? I don't see how it means "superior" Either you are being purposefully obtuse or you genuinely don't understand. I will try to address both by being very clear and slow. Men are leaders in the home, and in society in general. They have a higher rank. Definition of superior: higher in rank, status, or quality. Men are, by the dictionary definition, superior to women. I never said that. You are against them getting ABCD. You don't want them campaigning to get ABCD. They for sure have …
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 06:29 PM
1

Even if you didn't explicitly say me, you represented it as if it was me. That's the definition of misrepresentation. Secondly, please provide evidence to where I said "Being homeless is a position of power"
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 06:16 PM
1

There is no simple answer to that. By someone who thinks in stereotypes, women would be seen as submissive, but their lives would be considered more valuable. Men would be seen as leaders, but also as someone who is expected to be put in danger. Men are seen as de facto leaders by the incredibly huge majority of society. I'm not sure why it took you so long to admit this. As for the valuable part, I whole heartedly disagree with you. I already explained why I am not going to do it again until yo…
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 06:11 PM
1

Ah I see. Misrepresentation with the goal of making logical arguments seem illogical. And using extreme lies to do so. It is clear you don't argue in good faith. All the same I will respond to you
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 06:00 PM
-2

It's spelled "literally". Kind of weird to make that mistake when accusing someone of being illiterate
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 05:43 PM
-3

Holy shit! LMAO! Do you not understand how English works? The author of the quote is saying women are not a numerical minority, but a social one. His point is irrelevant. I don't need a gotcha moment when the takes here are consistently dumb
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 05:40 PM
-5

While I disagree with the general premise of the stated title, I find the title of this post hilarious and indicative of the lack of critical thinking in the sub. The quote specified NOT numerical minority and the OP's main criticism is that women are not the numerical minority.
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 04:54 PM
-3

I'm a guy
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 04:49 PM
-11

FYI I'm a man. I find this sub hilarious in it's false logic and untenable positions that don't hold up to the lightest bit of questioning. Sure a woman's gender isn't your problem. What I find curious is that you actively participate in an ANTI-feminist stance. So yeah you have kind of made it your goal to prevent them fixing their issues. Replying to both of you, this sub is anti-feminist. I'm not sure what your point is. And since when have agency and accountability been the opposite of femin…
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 04:49 PM
-4

Holy shit lmao. I'm super curious as to when I said this. WTF???
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 04:47 PM
3

The book has been entirely trashed on all reviews. No-one likes it. And I'm intrigued by the fact that the author has chosen to hide their identity.
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 04:45 PM
1

I'm not cherry picking metrics. The question is simple. Who is seen as superior in society? In the family? In the workforce? Don't dodge these questions. Kindly answer them. That's not the first time I'm asking that - I do it every time when you say some issue is related to feminism, and you answer that no, it's not related to feminism. So I'm confused too. Men's problems are not a feminist issue. They don't solve men's problems for men. I've said this. Yet you still keep bringing it up as if it…
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 04:34 PM
1

Again - it is only true if your definition of "lower position" includes "being less likely to become homeless and having an opportunity to live at someone's expense without working". How do you not understand this. These are far from the only metrics that define a groups place in society. I already gave you examples for both and you completely disregarded them. During slavery White people were more likely to be homeless. Children today are looked after by adults. Neither of these are/were consid…
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 03:18 PM
1

Feminism states that women are oppressed as an axiom that is always true, which is the root of the problem. It is evident that women are oppressed. They consistently hold lower positions in society. I gave you facts that showed this. In addition, you were very disingenuous in your answer below: That differs from family to family. In general, I think it would be the person that takes more responsibility for the family. That is not what I asked. I asked who is seen as the head. In general, in soci…
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 08:56 AM
1

As we agreed, inequality can't be a problem of one gender - it's a problem of both. So if it has nothing to do with feminism, that means feminism doesn't really want equality. I don't know how to make this more clear. We did not agree. I specifically stated when a group is oppressed, gaining rights is achieving equality. e.g slaves gaining rights to freedom. Just because the movement was specifically for black people does not mean they were getting superiority, they were getting equality. Do you…
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 07:13 AM
1

Then campaign to get it fixed!!! It has absolutely nothing to do with feminism. Instead of campaigning to get problems fixed for your own gender, this entire sub demonizes a group trying to fix problems faced by their gender. And it is so confusing. Homelessness is a problem? Get your representatives to fix the problem!! Campaign. Get involved. Instead you focus on another group fixing their problems. And what assumption did I make?
/r/AntiFeminists10/07/22 06:40 PM
1

You keep harping on homelessness. And again I'll say, that's far from being the only indicator of a groups position in society. On its own, it is irrelevant. You have ignored everything else I said. Respond to those points if you are so convinced in your position
/r/AntiFeminists10/07/22 05:29 PM
1

Not quite, while men are more likely to become homeless, they still occupy the higher rung in society. In today's society, if you ask someone who the head of a family is, the answer is pretty clear. Of the fortune 500, only 8% are women. 25% of government. They are very clearly seen as inferior by society in general. Men are "naturally" given the position of leadership. The superior position. And women are expected to be submissive. High homeless rates of men do not give any indication of their …
/r/AntiFeminists10/07/22 05:06 PM
1

And is that the only criteria you use when deciding this?
/r/AntiFeminists10/07/22 03:33 PM
1

No my definition of superior is the literal definition of superior. Holding a higher place in society
/r/AntiFeminists10/07/22 03:20 PM
1

Equality doesn't work like that. It's either men and women are equal or they are not. I couldn't have put it better myself. Right now men are superior to women. Plain and simple. And you are against them getting rights that would lead to equality for some reason
/r/AntiFeminists10/07/22 02:34 PM
-1

Lmao, did this actually trigger you? That's funnier than the shitty joke
/r/AntiFeminists10/07/22 02:21 PM
1

If you mean equality to men - you can't reach it without doing somethings that benefit men or disadvantage women. Otherwise, it won't beequality - unless by "equality" you mean "superiority". You literally admitted that women do not have equality. You know they are denied opportunities and treated differently because of their gender. Yes, and thank you for making it so clear. That's exactly my point:equality is not feminism's goal, and actions that would make societymore equal have nothing to do…
/r/AntiFeminists10/07/22 02:10 PM
1

Sure, I agree with that. I just don't agree feminism in its current form has a slightest chance to fix it and bring equality for everyone, because of how it's built. A lot of you say this, and the goal of feminism is simply put to gain equality for women. What specifically is wrong with feminism in it's current form. That sounds great! Since feminism exists for more than 100 years now, I'm sure you are not alone who thinks that, and so this issue was addressed multiple times by feminists and som…
/r/AntiFeminists10/07/22 12:05 PM
2

Firstly your English is pretty good hey. And thanks for clarifying. Men don't have this opportunity because of gender roles enforced by society. The same applies to women taking half of a man's stuff in case of divorce. Because a man is seen as a provider because of his gender, then the law insures he provides after divorce. Breaking gender roles and stereotypes will stop this from happening. Breaking those gender roles is quite literally the goal of feminism. In a feminist society, men will be …
/r/AntiFeminists10/07/22 11:00 AM
1

I understand it if it means feminists either want to give men anopportunity to become a househusband, or to take such an opportunityfrom women. I'm sorry but could you please say this in another way. I cannot understand what you're saying. Are you saying men should be househusbands? I don't. How can we say if a certain position is limited by gender? There have been plenty studies analysing the shortage of women in STEM fields, in CEO positions, in political positions in so forth. Feel free to re…
/r/AntiFeminists09/07/22 09:28 PM
1

All opportunities matter. However if positions of authority are denied to a certain group because they are a part of that group, that is the definition of oppression. Regardless, opportunities, regardless of what they are should be made equal. Please tell me you are understand this. The goal of feminism is reached when gender is not a barrier to entry for any opportunity. And no we will not inevitably end up in the society you describe. A win, considered by feminism, is when, and I'll repeat thi…
/r/AntiFeminists09/07/22 05:23 PM
1

Who said men don't face systemic problems? They do and those need solving. What does that have to do with feminism? Firstly, the benefit of women single parents does not stem from feminism, but has long since been prevalent due to gender roles that see men as providers. The very gender roles feminism is trying to do away with. The same applies to how the social safety net works. Women may be more likely to get hired for certain jobs, far from the majority, but their advancement within positions …
/r/AntiFeminists09/07/22 05:17 PM
-2

Yes they can back it up. And history is irrelevant. They face systemic oppression today. Forget history What has feminism done to hurt men? And what examples of misandry are prevalent in feminism?
/r/AntiFeminists09/07/22 02:12 PM
-2

This is a regular occurrence? Most women treat their husbands like this? Women have been treated by society terribly as well. On a scale far greater than men. Feminism is not based on misandry, so I'm entirely confused on why you conflate the 2
/r/AntiFeminists09/07/22 01:43 PM
-2

You see a comic of a woman doing a bad thing, and this justifies your dislike of women in general?
/r/AntiFeminists09/07/22 01:16 PM
0

Define submission
/r/AntiFeminists09/07/22 01:12 PM
1

It has had a good measurable goal for the past 27 years. Is that somehow not long enough for you? The fact remains they have measurable goals so your point is entirely moot. I just told you. The fact that there is gender inequality in roles prescribed to people is evidence of oppression. Roles that don't typically involve power are what are assigned to women, hence the oppression. The last question again, read any report on the gender inequality index for your country of choice, the metrics used…
/r/AntiFeminists09/07/22 12:55 PM
1

Then perhaps peruse your country's gender inequality index. That should answer your first 2 questions. And yes that is the goal of feminism. To not have any roles tied to gender by society, be that nursing, looking after children, engineering, leadership or anything. The gender inequality index should answer your last question too
/r/AntiFeminists09/07/22 07:24 AM
0

There are plenty of laws favouring men over women but that's entirely beside the point. The point is systemic egalitarianism, one in which society and the legal system allow for equality for all regardless of gender. Exactly, when women are not held back in society we have reached our goal. I like how you said, we need to make sure we aren't going to far. That shows you intimately recognise we are currently too far the other way, in denying opportunities for women. They are plenty of metrics and…
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 09:22 PM
-1

Again, if you refuse to have your name on the birth certificate, you will not be and cannot be forced to support a child. Male genital mutilation has nothing to do with feminism, at all. It is a problem in my opinion, but again has nothing to do with feminism. They are not pro circumcision. If you have a problem with circumcision, feel free to campaign. You severely misunderstand the purpose and operation of gender quotas. Feel free to give any example of how gender quotas have led to women havi…
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 09:17 PM
-2

Which shelters were closed by feminists. The only reference for a men's shelter closing was due to lack of funding. Nothing to do with feminism. I ignored it because you consistently seem to make claims with no backing. But please feel free to provide a source. Feminism is seeking rights for women. Women seeking rights does not impact you in the slightest. Men's suicide rate has nothing to do with feminism. Who says you should lose your lives for women. Don't if you don't want to. The giant move…
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 09:13 PM
0

Why do y'all jump around on topics so much. Please stick to what we are discussing or I'll take it as tacit admissal that you've confirmed that my points above were entirely correct. Now onto UK laws of rape. That is a problem. The law was not made by feminists. In fact feminists have and still campaign for that law to be reformed https://dro.dur.ac.uk/8122/ The very feminists you hate so much are doing something about that issue. What does feminism have to do with high suicide rates in men? Whi…
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 08:49 PM
0

You get it wrong. Laws do matter. And no, if every existing law favored women over men then men would be oppressed. The problem is this. Society, in many cases, does not offer women the same opportunities as men. Feminism advocates to change that. Do you see the problem now?
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 08:15 PM
-4

Systemic refers not only to the legal system but applies to society as a whole. You get that right?
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 07:07 PM
1

It means she's a piece of shit. That's all. It gives no indication on how the legal system treated her
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 05:43 PM
0

Again, her cheating and having fun has nothing to with her getting away with it!!! How do you not understand that? Having fun does not mean you have gotten away with it? In addition the article shared by OP is from 2013 and also has not one single source stated throughout it. No facts, no figures to base the article on
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 05:11 PM
0

What was the indication? Sure I'll admit that I'm blind if it gets you tell me WHAT THE INDICATION THAT SHE WAS FAVOURED BY THE LEGAL SYSTEM WAS. Also, woah. Sick burn there. How will I ever recover from being called a simp by some random stranger on the internet.
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 04:30 PM
1

True evidence of higher thought there. Defaulting to calling someone else a simp is objectively hilarious. Again, false allegations, I agree with you. Gets away with it? Where? How did she get away with it? Did a civil suit find her innocent? Was she not prosecuted criminally? Was she not fined? Do you have any answers or any indication on any of those processes
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 04:21 PM
0

Contraire mon frere. I would like you to use yours. The fact that she is cheating gives absolutely zero indication on her legal status. Nada. Zero. Zilch.
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 04:15 PM
-2

You have right to choose parenthood. As long as you are not listed on the birth certificate, you have no obligation. Right genital integrity confuses me. Women campaigned to prevent brutal mutilation of private parts that resulted in women having total inability to experience sexual pleasure. What does that have to do with you? If you feel circumcision is wrong, no feminist is going to stop you from campaigning against that. Government enforced gender quotas? Would you also like to ensure men ha…
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 04:12 PM
1

What does that have to do with her filing a false case?
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 04:07 PM
1

I have no idea what happened. But YOU said she got away with it. Where did you get that from? Your entire premise is based on what exactly?
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 04:04 PM
1

Who said she got away with it?
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 04:02 PM
-5

Feminism does have measurable goals. All of them tied to solving systemic inequalities women face simply because they are a different gender. The fact you don't know this kind of highlights that you have dismissed feminism as a knee-jerk reaction without doing any due diligence If you need some of those goals specifically highlighted, feel free to let me know
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 03:33 PM
0

Some rights such as? What are the specific rights they want more than men?
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 03:26 PM
1

Yes she filed a FALSE case. Nowhere does it say whether she is being prosecuted or how the legal system is handling her filing of a FALSE case. Again she did bad thing. Nowhere does it say the law is favouring her. It's boiled down again to woman do bad thing, so feminism bad
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 02:36 PM
-1

And where does that indicate that the law favoured her?
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 02:25 PM
-2

And how exactly did the law favour the woman in this video
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 02:08 PM
-10

Feminism is not about placing women above men. If you are so sure that's what it is, how exactly does Feminism want to place women above men
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 01:09 PM
-3

Lol both of these links are terrible arguments. Firstly feminism does not use women getting voting rights as a get out criticism free card. The fact is simply put, women getting the right to vote is, by definition, a feminist aspiration. If you support women's right to vote, you to a certain extent, support feminism. The entire problem with Karen Straughan is that she doesn't argue against feminism. She creates her own definition of feminism to argue against. She is arguing against herself. ​ Bo…
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 01:08 PM
-5

Is this sub basically "A woman does a bad thing, so feminism is bad"?
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 12:43 PM
1

Listen, I'm going to be kind to to you as well and explain how debate in good faith works. Explaining your viewpoint is irrelevant if it is based on your personal experience and has no data backing it up. You have failed the basic tenets of debate in good faith. Your subjective experience has zero bearing on the debate. The fact that you enter the debate with phrases like "Help you recover from feminism" "you will have an epiphany" Is indication enough that you have no good faith in this debate.…
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 09:34 AM
1

I have been debating by my own rules. I have not resorted to childish imitation in an effort to get out of backing up my claims. That would be you. Again all I'm waiting for is a single source to your claims. That's it. Literally that's all. Not some crazy requirement. Just a reason why you feel you can make such a claim. Any evidence at all. Anything that would give reason for what you say. Literally anything at all If you need a reminder, You asserted that feminism campaigns against the recogn…
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 08:34 AM
1

Oh, you're doing that. I don't know why I expected any form of intelligent debate with the denizens of this sub
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 08:09 AM
1

Uhhh yeah, exactly. So provide the source
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 06:21 AM
1

I have gone through it for the past week. Not a single link or reference to any study, article or any sort of evidence Still waiting for any backup for your claim
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 05:23 PM
0

Firstly I never made that specific claim, but I have nevertheless provided evidence that proves that feminism has by virtue of its goals helped men. Look through my comment history. Secondly I'm still waiting for your evidence backing your claim. You keep dodging that
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 05:16 PM
0

You clearly don't understand how this works. If I make a claim I have to back it up. If you make a claim you have to back it up. That is how debate in good faith works. Or anyone can claim anything. For example I can claim feminists saved hundreds of thousands of male lives last year
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 09:34 AM
0

The fact is quite simply they do not. You made the claim, back it up with a source. Give any evidence for your claim. And before you say "google it" no. You made the claim. Burden of proof is on you
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 08:05 AM
0

Feminists do not campaign against the recognition of parental alienation.
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 07:44 AM
1

Tell me a single way, one, that feminism has campaigned against, or harmed the rights of men or children
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 06:38 AM
0

Read the sub description. Whether the sub agrees with me or not is entirely beside the point
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 06:37 AM
0

Please just look up the definition as well as the goals before you make claims
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/22 12:41 AM
1

Of course yes I understand it. I base all my opinions on what comedians say too. You're arguing semantics, and I respect those people enough to call them what they want to be called. The lack of understanding actually confounds me here. I don't know what to do about it. I'll try with short easy to understand sentences. Me: I am a man. I pee in the shower. My friend: I am a man. I don't pee in the shower. You: Men are disgusting. They pee in the shower. ​ I hope that makes it easy for you to unde…
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 11:57 PM
1

I definitely gave this sub too much credit. I agree with you there. My favorite type of argument is "Comedians make jokes about it" That right there is a sound basis for any critical thinking yes sir. Again I'll say this, you can hate anti-men people all you want. That's your prerogative. Do what you will. The fact remains, feminism is not anti-men. Extremists do not care about dissenting viewpoints. Also extremists do not define a movement. Hence the term extremist. Critical thinking is awfully…
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 11:30 PM
1

It is not my "favorite ideology" and no it has not lost it's meaning, despite this sub's best efforts. Regardless of how much you try to equate anti-men sentiment with feminism, it quite simply isn't the case lol. But keep trying. Sure let's ignore the point. You get to generalize based on a small sub segment but it just doesn't make sense when generalizations would affect you negatively. The stench of hypocrisy is strong. You mean the conscription that was deactivated by the feminist government…
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 11:06 PM
1

Those are disgusting jokes. I agree with you. That's anti-man. You are again generalizing feminism with anti-men. They are not one and the same. It would be akin to me calling conservatives school shooters because of the actions and words of some. You asked for one example to change your mind. How about the entire country of Sweden.
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 10:45 PM
1

I asked because it applies to this discussion very much. Whether the law should cover for where society lacks. Discrimination already occurs, society is not equal to different races and genders, and it negatively impacts those discriminated against in many different ways, their jobs, their living situations and so much more. Well wishes from, even from a majority of society, cannot compensate for this discrimination. This leaves what recourse besides legal solutions to remedy said discrimination…
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 10:38 PM
1

Terms do matter. We use them to refer to specific things. I am not looking to have a debate on whether words mean anything. I am not anti-man. I am pro feminism. If you dislike anti-man ideology, sure go ahead. But you have chosen to specifically dislike feminism. Feminism is not anti-man. It is fighting for equal rights. Those are the succinct points
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 10:20 PM
0

Do you get how you're generalizing again. You have quite literally fallen right back into your own trap. It's incredibly confusing how you don't see that. Don't call out random debate shit when it does not apply. No true scotsman fallacy is sticking to a generalization by discounting evidence against that generalization. For example, claiming feminism is anti-man(i.e a generalization), when there are so many examples of feminists who are not anti-man. You cannot discount those examples. Again, b…
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 09:59 PM
1

So you have done no research on how the legal system could allow for greater equality? No looks at studies on how society as a whole has impacted genders differently in different scenarios? No looks at how certain policies have improved other countries overall outlook in financial and life satisfaction for women to bring them on par for men? As long as the law permits possible advancement, then any internal company policies, societal pressures or inbuilt prejudices that would make that advanceme…
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 09:51 PM
1

Legal rights for equality? I'm curious, do you believe that beyond the actual freeing of the slaves, anything else should have been done to ensure they had equal access to opportunity? Sure let's test that egalitarian position, what laws do you believe should be put in place to ensure that women have equal access to advancement in the work place?
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 09:36 PM
0

Ok. I realize now you might be having difficulty understanding a simple concept. "Don't confuse someone who is anti-man for a feminist" This means DO NOT generalize. Anti-man does not equal feminist. Are there feminists who are anti-men? Sure. Are there feminists who do not prescribe to anti-men ideas? ALSO YES One does not necessarily equal the other. Anti-men sentiment has nothing to do with feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 09:22 PM
0

I never claimed that, never said that and never implied that.
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 09:13 PM
-1

You realize you're the one making generalizations about feminists right? Do you understand the concept of no true scotsman?
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 09:08 PM
1

Sure I would hope so, the incoherent rants in response to simple points prove otherwise. Feminism fights for women's rights. That's the definition of equality. To give an extreme example that illustrates this, Abraham Lincoln who fought for black people's rights to freedom, fought for equality. Fighting for rights of a group that do not have equal access is fighting for equality ​ Claiming to be egalitarian does not make you egalitarian
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 08:39 PM
0

Read the sub description and rules. Nowhere does it say that. In fact it specifically says that it's for critiquing feminist views. Hence debate.
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 08:05 PM
1

Sure I believe that's what masculinity should be defined as. I am all for that. When people fight against toxic masculinity, they are literally saying masculinity should have a positive definition. Just like that one. Toxic masculinity is, in part, when people and society as a whole pressure men into repressing feelings, as evidenced by the incredibly high suicide rate of men. Yes feminism has a core belief against patriarchy. Patriarchy exists, the fact that you believe the head of a family sho…
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 08:02 PM
1

"I've been proven wrong, all my points had no substance and were easily rebutted. I couldn't even give a simple answer to any of the questions he asked. But I'll try one last zinger before I go!" I think that's what you meant to actually say
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 07:40 PM
-2

That is what they are. As someone who supports feminism that is what I support. They are not fighting for more rights, they are fighting for equality
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 07:19 PM
0

Well read the comments then
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 07:18 PM
1

Feminism is about women's rights. It is the fight for women's rights. Simple and plain. I'm glad you agree the feminist policies in Denmark and Sweden are a goal to be aimed for. Turns out you're secretly a feminist after all. Don't tell your friends on this sub. Toxic masculinity is absolutely a thing. The idea that masculinity requires me to be stoic, to hide my feelings, to wallow in depression until I commit suicide, to be distant from my family is literally toxic masculinity. That is what i…
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 07:12 PM
1

I specifically said rabid. Which refers to thoughtless knee jerk reaction of being against without any reasonable articulable explanation of why. Feminism is for gender equality. That is it's goal. They primarily fight for women's rights. Hence the term feminism. Them fighting for their rights in no way impacts yours, but you are against it. You are against equality
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 07:05 PM
1

Feminism is about women fighting for their rights. For you to understand and empathize do you need them to expressly fight for yours? Also you asked how you benefited and I fulfilled that requirement only for you to change the goalposts later. ​ So your explanation for stagnating wages is women entering the workforce? Yes, women's happiness has steadily decreased. Curious how in countries like Sweden and Denmark which actively support many of the rights feminists fight for, women's happiness has…
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 06:33 PM
0

It was not made by feminist politicians. It has nothing to do with feminism. Also I can't believe I have to point this out. Feminism is not fighting for you. It's fighting for women's rights. Those rights, it turns out, also benefit men! A society that promotes equality turns out way better for everyone other than the elite. I'm not going to lie. The rest of your comment devolved somewhat into a bit of an incoherent rant, but I'd be more than happy to respond to you if you rephrase it an easier …
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 06:24 PM
0

The name of this sub is antifeminists. Feminism is fighting for women's rights. You are against feminism. I hope the logic is not too hard for you to follow. Yes that is problematic law. It should be updated. It was not made by feminists. It has nothing to do with feminism at all. Yes suicide rates for men are inordinately high, and I do campaign for that to be addressed. What does that have to do with feminism
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 06:04 PM
1

No it's not interesting at all. I firmly believe if a man does not want a child, and the woman insists on it, he has no obligation to the child. It also does not refute my point at all so again I don't know why you brought it up in answer to it. You asked how feminism benefited men, and I literally just told you. A benefit that has come to men, from women advocating for their own rights. Asking for specifics in another category does not answer that point at all. Again wage rises have nothing to …
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 06:01 PM
1

Smarter people than me have discussed and explored it so here you go
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 05:52 PM
0

I responded to the fucking ARTICLE. Read that too. Nothing has been disproven. I also list stuff with backing. Noone said men should not fight for things they need help with. The question is why are you against women who are also fighting for rights??
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 05:49 PM
1

I literally just answered. Did you read the very comment you are replying to?
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 05:43 PM
0

I didn't make an assumption. You are against feminism. Hence your support of the antifeminists sub. I'm no Sherlock but I'll make the very small leap in logic there. The fight for abortion rights and access to contraceptives after the fact is very much a feminist movement. Do you really need a source for that or are you being purposefully obtuse. Yes wages have stagnated and prices have skyrocketed. That has nothing to do with my point and I'm not sure why you brought it up. It does not refute i…
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 05:37 PM
1

Firstly I never said they can't have successful lives. I said they have different problems and you've entirely sidestepped that. The issue is not that they are entirely derived of any and all rights, it is that in many cases they faces barriers to entry that simply put, men do not face
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 05:21 PM
0

No one said men don't face problems. Men have plenty problems. Why does that mean you have to be rabidly against those who are campaigning for their rights? Also if you need personal benefit to empathize with those seeking rights sure go ahead and look through the comments. I've already responded to someone else with that
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 05:18 PM
1

I just answered, please feel free to refer to the comment. But again. Even if you don't support something because it doesn't directly benefit you, that's no excuse for rabid anger at someone asking for equality. Sure, go ahead and be pro-men, that's your prerogative. You don't have to be against someone else asking for rights to champion your own
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 05:16 PM
1

They have different problems than you. How do you not understand that?
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 05:14 PM
0

Firstly you only support something if it directly benefits you, but are rabidly against it when it quite literally doesn't affect you in any real capacity? OK sure, off the top of my head: Quite frankly, greater access to contraception and reproductive rights. Now a whole lot of men don't have to pay child support where they previously would have. Greater access to the working place has essentially doubled the income of many families and eased the financial pressure men have faced. Fighting toxi…
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 05:13 PM
0

Women who don't care about women are anti-men. Don't confuse someone who is anti-man for a feminist. Finding a rabid anti-man sentiment and mistaking that for feminism is the fundamental flaw of this entire sub
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 05:08 PM
0

What does bricklaying have to do with this. If a woman wants to be a bricklayer sure. There shouldn't be artificial barriers to entry. Victims of war? Of course women famously don't suffer during war time. The raping and pillaging part entirely skips them over. The equality I'm talking about is women not facing barriers to entry where they shouldn't. That's all. That is what feminism is
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 05:06 PM
0

Quite simply no it doesn't.
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 05:03 PM
-2

Exactly. Feminist. The definition of feminist is someone who believes women should be treated as equal to men
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 05:03 PM
-10

That is blatantly false. Feminism is pro-equality. That does NOT mean anti-male
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 01:49 PM
-11

Unfortunately none of your arguments are valid, simply because: Mens rights are not tied to antifeminism. Don't conflate the two. Feminism is a call for equality. Antifeminism is anti-equality Those 2 pillars this sub stands for simply don't hold water when put to any real test
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 01:48 PM
1

As opposed to reluctant consent? I'd take the former every time
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 01:36 PM
-1

How do you confuse "I would like to be treated as an equal" for "I want the upper hand in society"?
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 01:34 PM
-11

Could also be: Antifeminists listening to actual problems that negatively affect both men and women Antifeminists crying about feminism This sub is so confusing, conflating men's rights with antifeminism is kinda wild
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 01:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter