TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

daddock Archive

View 0 posts and 18 comments by daddock on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-7

Man I’m not someone who calls myself a feminist because I think feminism has become awful the last decade. This movie is just some lighthearted nonsense. Bad behavior could also be considered not addressing how men can be creepy, whether you consider it a gender issue or not. I hear your point that men do all of the more physical tasks and life threatening tasks, and it is frustrating that women pass over that and focus on the positions of power and areas that pay very well. Believe me I have ha…
/r/MensRights25/07/23 12:47 AM
-10

I say this as someone who identifies more with MRAs than feminists, and it may be a hot take, but I think this movie is mildly misandrist at most. I don’t think it was super deep like some people may. This was just a movie that was huge, and was targeted towards women who played with Barbies as kids. Was it great, no. Does it promote hate, not really. Kens were second class citizens because they were created to be props for Barbies by Mattel, and tbh this movie does shit on Mattel. Honestly the …
/r/MensRights24/07/23 10:36 PM
3

I'm thinking the more normal it becomes, the less this will be an issue. Circumcision will decline, and so will ignorance about foreskin
/r/MensRights27/12/13 12:39 AM
6

It baffles me that people are still so hostile towards foreskin. It's like they think it's some kind of scary disease ridden parasite living on a dick. I can't tell you how many times I've heard people talk about it and say "eww," or "gross." It's a fucking piece of skin, and shaming men for their lack of circumcision is a major problem in the usa. It affected me a lot growing up, and a good friend of mine who is objectively extremely attractive admitted to me that he has never had sex due to hi…
/r/MensRights27/12/13 12:17 AM
5

You should visit /r/nofap Its a subreddit for porn addicts
/r/MensRights23/10/13 06:09 PM
1

Much of that was projection to the extreme. I cant believe the irony, especially in the first few points.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 11:16 PM
1

I have a friend (also is my ex) who prefers short guys. She also often goes for younger guys. As she put it, "I like to wear the pants in the relationship."
/r/MensRights05/10/13 09:01 PM
-4

Not many feminists use that definition of patriarchy anyway. For many, everyone is to blame for perpetuating patriarchy, not just men. While I think using the term patriarchy is a bit unnecessary (it's an outdated word for our current state), if you just think about the word as a synonym for "our current system of gender expectations," then it makes some sense. As for whether or not men are higher in the hierarchy, that is pretty dubious, and kind of a messed up way to look at the world, but you…
/r/MensRights31/08/13 04:23 PM
1

Maybe if you add 5 years to their ages it would be different, but I think the general consensus is that 10 year olds are children, who dont know any better, and if they rape someone, it is likely they have been sexually abused previously. A fifteen year old guy raping a 9 year old would be judged as a monster though, whereas a girl would just be some stupid teenager who made a mistake once. Edit: come to think of it, add another 5 years to everyone, and the double standard would be even worse, b…
/r/MensRights24/08/13 10:23 PM
4

Well consider my panties in a bunch. Its been awhile since an article has pissed me off this much.
/r/MensRights24/08/13 02:51 AM
2

You are right about cenk and statutory rape. He sometimes is a little old fashioned, but I am pretty sure everyone else (definitely ana) disagrees with him on that issue, so I dont think it is fair go say the whole show is misandric based on that. Everyone knows cenk is wrong. Hell, cenk knows he is wrong (on a logical level). As for the wage gap, they do not understand its meaning fully, but I cannot find anything where they have really said anything terribly destructive regarding it. Bottom li…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:59 AM
12

To me, they usually seem pretty reasonable on gender topics (not extremely feminist). What do you find of theirs to be objectionable? Just curious.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 10:22 PM
27

I actually dont mind the concept, and think men should be able to do a similar issue as a well. Due to porn, many men do not know what an average penis looks like, and have faced similar insecurities. For that reason next issue should contain an array of both erect and flaccid penii
/r/MensRights22/08/13 08:40 PM
4

Many of these statistics are not universally accepted in the pediatric community, citing insufficient data. It seems that some stds are more common in uncircumsized men, while others are less common, which indicates those stats are meaninglessn as of now. Similarly, some types of prostate cancer are more common, however they are all not lethal. The more harmful types are actually marginally more common in circumsized men. There is also evidence indicating the foreskin helps prevent UTIs. Main po…
/r/MensRights22/08/13 08:26 PM
0

Ive had this problem before as well, but usually if I can just get the girl to try different motions with her mouth it works out. Its definitely possible that you have it worse than I do though, because its usually only a problem for me when they focus right on the tip.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 07:29 PM
30

Getting the procedures as an infant can also cause problems, including death. I dont see how risking medical issues to prevent a future, also not incredibly likely medical issue, is sensible.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 07:19 PM
20

Piercing the ear is far less of a problem. Its even reversible. At the same time, its still pretty fucked up to pierce a baby's ears. A better comparison would be tattooing a baby, and ive seen people get pretty outraged about that before.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 07:08 PM
1

In addition to the 13-17 thing, it also exaggerates by saying he had child porn on his phone. First of all, it implies he could have pictures of other underage people, which he didn't, and secondly, is a 17 year old really a child? I understand why the cutoff is 18, but if he isn't sending those pictures around to other people, I fail to see who was harmed.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 09:00 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter