TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dagbrown Archive

View 0 posts and 44 comments by dagbrown on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

It's more incel criticism than an incel comment. PUA techniques work on a, er...subset of women out there, but you're not going to enter into a healthy relationship with that kind of start.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/01/21 01:36 PM
1

The last time someone tried to make a spin-off reddit from MensRights, he started out really well by pre-emptively banning a whole bunch of people who he claimed were pro-feminist trolls.
/r/MensRights22/06/10 05:45 AM
2

So how many people are pre-emptively banned from this one?
/r/MensRights22/06/10 04:09 AM
3

I think that the sensible thing to is to not get up in arms about how abused-women shelters don't allow men in. When you're a victim of abuse that finally ran away, you're not likely to be in the most logical state of mind, so anything that gives you space to regain your sanity is a good thing. The sensible thing to do would be to start opening shelters for battered men, with the same kind of conditions.
/r/MensRights12/06/10 11:12 AM
8

I once ate some food that looked good, but it turned out not to taste quite so nice. WAS I CHEF-RAPED?!?!?!
/r/MensRights07/06/10 01:34 AM
4

Yeah, this is a terrible sexist web page! Awful! Just check out where it says that only men are the abusers: Most abusers and batterers are males – but a significant minority are women. This being a "Women's Issue", the problem was swept under the carpet for generations and only recently has it come to public awareness. Oh wait. It didn't say that at all. Gosh.
/r/MensRights28/04/10 05:00 AM
-3

And if you look at the rest of the opinion section of that pathetic publication, it features the entire editorial staff prostrating themselves and pissing on their bellies to make up for stupidly publishing that, y'know, terrible terrible column by a guy who's obviously a serial rapist (and for all we know, eats the corpses of his victims afterwards). Plus, of course, the comments section of said terrible, terrible column are full of people calling for Alex Knepper's head, but not before extract…
/r/MensRights02/04/10 07:00 AM
2

It's the difference between a portrait shot and a candid shot. If you're taking a portrait, the subject is expected to look at the camera. But on the other hand, if you're shooting a candid shot, if anyone is looking at the camera, the shot is a failure. If the subject of a candid shot is aware of the camera, the photographer has failed. This shot sits in the area between a portrait and a candid shot.
/r/MensRights12/03/10 01:51 PM
6

You must have had weird dinnertimes as a kid, everyone staring at dad. Did it creep him out?
/r/MensRights12/03/10 04:12 AM
5

Devil's advocate here! That's an intimate picture around a dinner table, of a family. You don't have gaps around a dinner table in a typical family, though, especially if you're an idealized Conservative party family. The father is present: the picture is from the father's point of view, where the camera is. I'd argue that the image includes men by having them be so central to the picture that it's seen from the man's point of view. Just mentioning this as the alternative interpretation that cam…
/r/MensRights12/03/10 01:13 AM
3

Excellent! Sometimes the good guys win. Eventually.
/r/MensRights10/03/10 12:51 PM
4

Well, it's obviously his fault for wearing such provocative clothing, isn't it?
/r/MensRights03/03/10 12:34 AM
7

All this is harassing a spammer Fixed that for you. Does it matter what a spammer has between their legs?
/r/MensRights01/03/10 01:28 AM
6

Do what I did! Move to Japan. Lots of tiny little women here, and tall women are considered somehow more desirable, leaving lots of really short, lonely, absolutely adorable women to choose from.
/r/MensRights14/02/10 01:09 PM
4

draconionly Now I have this weird mental vision of a fire-breathing onion with wings. I have the feeling that that wasn't what the author of the piece had in mind, somehow.
/r/MensRights14/02/10 12:30 PM
3

women-hating Adjective describing an offensive activity... assholes Meaningless (and sexist, as a bonus) insult! Well done, you also know the rules! It's a shame that you do this even while decrying men doing the same thing. Are you, perhaps, just a bit of a hypocrite? I know, I know, you'll say, "oh, hey, wait, no, I'm not being sexist at all, the word asshole can be used for either sex," which is of course hand-wavy bullshit. I've only seen the word "asshole" used against a woman once in my en…
/r/MensRights09/02/10 09:35 PM
4

And I'm pretty sure that the downvoters missed the username. Stroke o' genius, that.
/r/MensRights24/01/10 01:05 PM
4

Covered in the article: she was pregnant, and didn't want to be squashed in between two other people. Although granted, if one of the other people was a small child, that probably wouldn't be as much of a problem.
/r/MensRights21/01/10 09:26 PM
8

I just had lots of fun giving out greyblue arrows to all those fucknozzles who told him what an awesome fun experience he just had and wondered what he was complaining about.
/r/MensRights13/01/10 04:53 AM
3

And this is where you see a prime example of how the LiveJournal Upvote happens. LiveJournal doesn't have upvoting, so every comment which someone likes gets a bunch of morons replying to say "This.", because "ME TOO!" doesn't make you look like enough of a moron.
/r/MensRights13/01/10 01:51 AM
13

Makes perfect sense for her to do that. I mean, if she's a domestic violence crusader, obviously she's in favor of domestic violence, right? Otherwise she'd be an anti-domestic-violence crusader.
/r/MensRights26/12/09 04:41 AM
2

I went to the University of Waterloo. If you're into Chinese girls, that's the best university ever.
/r/MensRights24/12/09 11:29 AM
3

Does this put him ahead of Genghis Khan? Will geneticists be talking about this legendary figure nearly a thousand years in the future?
/r/MensRights18/12/09 08:21 AM
7

The writer of that article must have felt really pleased at being able to slip the phrase "for unlawful carnal knowledge" in.
/r/MensRights18/12/09 04:50 AM
6

Continuing to fuck someone who is unconscious, wasted, who wanted it but then says to stop, is more like stealing someone's car in terms of order of magnitude than borrowing someone's pencil without telling them. Stealing someone's pencil and returning it later is closer to my girlfriend not being in the mood for sex, and me sweet-talking her and arousing her so that she becomes in the mood for sex. Is that rape?
/r/MensRights11/12/09 01:16 AM
2

It's made of 100% purest carbon! It's a lump of coal!
/r/MensRights05/12/09 01:46 PM
2

Particularly "GBWBLA". It's the sound of a particularly large turd splashing satisfyingly into one of those American toilets that are 3/4 full of water.
/r/MensRights30/11/09 10:51 AM
4

Oh come on, this is a clip from a Sam Peckinpah movie. That's merely the gentlest warmup for the bloodbath that's surely going to come later.
/r/MensRights28/11/09 12:07 PM
1

I keep a copy of Firefox running just for this kind of link.
/r/MensRights28/11/09 12:05 PM
1

I kind of disagree. That reaction looks like an instinctive twitch reaction, even though it had dramatic results.
/r/MensRights28/11/09 12:05 PM
6

And his caps lock won't go off.
/r/MensRights27/11/09 08:17 AM
4

I sense anger somehow.
/r/MensRights27/11/09 08:10 AM
3

Posting a comment in her blog would be giving her attention. Reporting her for abuse is something which happens silently behind her back. It's practically the opposite of attention.
/r/MensRights25/10/09 01:17 PM
2

I think that, should I ever have a daughter, I shall carefully neglect to mention such things as "glass ceilings" to her. Let's see how far she manages to proceed without feeling as if the world is against her.
/r/MensRights25/10/09 01:16 PM
2

They've obviously been bullied into doing so. By oppressors. They used their superior strength (which counts for so much on the Internet) to force these women into standing up for men. Those equality weirdos are the worst! It's almost as if they consider men to be fellow humans!
/r/MensRights25/10/09 01:15 PM
17

They are expected to be hit with felony conspiracy charges next week as the Federal Aviation Administration weighs civil penalties that up to $2 million. They accidentally up to $2 million.
/r/MensRights21/10/09 11:24 AM
23

Yes.
/r/MensRights19/10/09 12:39 AM
6

Daily Mail :(
/r/MensRights15/10/09 11:58 AM
2

And eight in /r/equality.
/r/MensRights13/10/09 12:59 AM
3

My Poe-o-meter is pinging softly on this one. I really want it to be parody.
/r/MensRights09/10/09 02:06 AM
11

Existence of DNA evidence can also act as a deterrent against filing false rape charges.
/r/MensRights08/10/09 02:47 AM
4

The boys talked about in that article are now the men that are being laid off in numbers an order of magnitude higher than those that women are being laid off at.
/r/MensRights21/09/09 04:10 AM
12

Seconding the wanting to change from "a feminazi is" to "a feminist is not". If it were changed to that, I'd be sharing it all over the place.
/r/MensRights20/09/09 07:08 AM
1

Shame that article was written by one of those right-wing halfwits who automatically equates anything bad with liberals.
/r/MensRights15/09/09 10:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter