TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dalovindj Archive

View 3 posts and 147 comments by dalovindj on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
113

No lunches, no after work drinks or hanging out, no closed office doors. Mike Pence rule all the way.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 10:47 PM
3

I've met a ton of white women in these roles which I always find amusing. Shouldn't you step down to allow someone more diverse to do that?
/r/PussyPassDenied30/03/21 03:23 AM
17

When in doubt, identify as a black disabled trans woman.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/02/21 01:25 AM
11

Try not. There is no try. Do or do not.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/02/21 01:23 AM
4

Golf either.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/20 07:13 PM
41

Sounds like a motley PI duo from the 1920s. "Dames know who to call when they've got a case that needs solving."
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/19 03:19 PM
10

At the same time?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/12/19 03:18 PM
11

I prefer apples.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/09/19 04:21 AM
2

This is making me want some sugarcorns.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/09/19 03:31 AM
40

That's one of the most striking things as you look at photos from the past in America. The people generally seem to get thinner the further back you go. You still had your occasional boss hog types but never the widespread obesity that is now a fact of life.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/09/19 03:29 AM
19

status amongst her piers. How many piers does she own? Must be a huge boating enthusiast.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/09/19 03:26 AM
1

When you see a man with an umbrella you know things have gotten serious.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/08/19 01:53 PM
0

Yep. And that's exactly why I'll always take whatever other option is available if I have the choice.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/08/19 12:41 PM
1

I'll probably just get a Samsung Galaxy 10 or something when that dark day comes.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/08/19 06:22 AM
3

Buses are undesirable and often involve suffering through tight, cramped quarters with people who smell bad, and you will commonly see a good selection of overweight people cramped into undersized seats. Most of the riders are on the poorer end of the spectrum and are generally unhappy with having to take the bus, so tensions run high. It's a miserable experience that most who have the means to avoid do so.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/08/19 06:18 AM
1

In addition to waterproofing and protecting from falls, my ottorbox hides the shame.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/08/19 06:16 AM
2

A 7 wouldn't have a headphone jack And here is the primary reason I'm still on a 6. If it ever fails me, I'm likely done with Apple phones unless they bring the 3.5mm jack back.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/08/19 06:15 AM
7

Spk u mnd.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/08/19 06:11 AM
45

Most of recorded history?
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/19 01:28 PM
8

Was going to spring for four to see this in the theaters because I have some nostalgic affection for the original, but now I think I'll pass and we will just watch it (if at all) when it hits the movie channels/Netflix. Thanks for saving me the $80, woketard!
/r/MensRights13/06/19 03:46 PM
2

I was a little drunk last night. Wrong link and then I couldn't be bothered to fix it. Not sure what was going through the minds of those that upvoted, but I'll take 'em.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/06/18 08:30 PM
1

Eh, we all wanna fuck something new every now and again. It's nothing personal. Some have the will power to resist, some don't. Not the end of the world in either case.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/06/18 03:00 AM
9

I cannot draw it, but here is the Black Eyed Peas track Fly Away.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/06/18 02:57 AM
24

Pretty soon we are going to see Elon's final form and Earth shall finally be united under one King. "A multitude of rulers is not a good thing. Let there be one ruler, one king." ~ Homer, The Iliad
/r/PussyPassDenied25/05/18 06:19 AM
8

Gay for the stay.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/03/18 07:32 PM
30

Except, of course, the ones who her husband raped.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/09/17 09:10 PM
1

Who knows what new magic we'll find in the article as the hours go by!
/r/MensRights18/01/17 08:18 PM
2

With a small broken dick no less.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/10/16 07:22 PM
2

Mayonnaise is a gender.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 12:39 PM
5

Everything is a gender. Every. Thing.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 07:25 AM
10

That you would even equate the kind of laws being passed here and the pure barbarism of the laws in some Islamic countries shows just how disconnected from reality you have become. And all in the name of some bizarre, self-destructive notion of tolerance.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/06/16 03:59 PM
2

Uhh, guys, I think those numbers are millions. There are only 7.1 billion people on all of the planet.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 04:26 AM
3

Artificial wombs and sex robots are pretty much going to decimate their corner on the market.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 09:16 PM
5

Autoerotica.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 05:11 PM
1

I think you just outed yourself as the Borg.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 07:30 PM
6

Well, sounds like there isn't much else I can do then. You could always man up and focus on real problems.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 06:38 PM
10

Yes, I've had many such conversations. I've explored the topic thoroughly in Media Culture Theory, African American Studies, and Gender Studies classes. I've listened to and read endless debate on the matter and come to a conclusion through rational thought and analysis. The premise is anti-intellectual and infantalizing. It is unimportant in the grand scheme of things, and the most important thing about it is the importance of rejecting it as a concern of any merit.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 05:49 PM
10

I understand it fully and reject the premise. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/09/the-coddling-of-the-american-mind/399356/
/r/MensRights11/09/15 05:33 PM
13

Yes, the term 'microaggressions' has a definition. No, it is not a concern that needs to be addressed, accepting of course insofar as to discredit the idea that it is in any way important whatsoever and/or to illustrate its true purpose as a path, not towards equality and balancing the fairness equation, but rather simply towards reversing it (ie once you've had a boot on your neck you won't be happy until your boot is on someone else's neck). The quotations are appropriate. Obsession with micro…
/r/MensRights11/09/15 05:13 PM
4

'Die Hard' was just the source of me misquoting it for years, and I assume is the only interaction with the quote that large swaths of the US population have had. When I looked it up and found out that Hans Gruber mangled the quote and the intent, I actually thought it was kind of a cool character point. His version was 'When Alexander saw the breadth of his domain, he wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer.' Hans isn't as smart as he thinks, despite his classical education, and not only…
/r/TheRedPill23/07/15 02:35 PM
2

Alexander's lament, misquoted in Die Hard, wasn't that 'there were no more worlds to conquer'. It comes from Plutarch. After being told that there were infinite worlds, he was depressed because he hadn't even been able to fully conquer just one. Alexander cried when he heard Anaxarchus talk about the infinite number of worlds in the universe. One of Alexander's friends asked him what was the matter, and he replied, "There are so many worlds, and I have not yet conquered even one."
/r/TheRedPill23/07/15 12:45 PM
1

How do you do that?
/r/MensRights14/07/15 01:46 AM
-8

Poison the dog.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 01:41 PM
2

easy to prove thing... Not so easy, apparently.
/r/MensRights23/06/15 01:35 PM
10

Because their goal isn't an equal and fair world, their goal is to harm men while placing themselves in an elevated position of power, not to achieve egalitarian equality. In short, they are horrible people.* *Horrible in as much as they have free agency. Many of them suffer from mental illnesses and will happily tell you about their conditions and all the meds they take (or are supposed to take). I'd concede that those that are mentally ill are not necessarily horrible people, rather they are b…
/r/MensRights10/06/15 05:01 AM
10

It’s astounding how aggressive students’ assertions of vulnerability have gotten in the past few years. Emotional discomfort is regarded as equivalent to material injury, and all injuries have to be remediated. This notion that emotional discomfort is a tragedy that must be rallied against and prioritized above all else - above fairness, above due process, above truth - is despicable and entirely ridiculous. Intellectual midgetry. Stay out of higher ed if you aren't ready to be uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 02:00 AM
1

The problem with identity politics, then, is that it is one-sided and undialectical. It treats identities as static entities, and its methods only serve to further reify those categories. It aims to liberate identity groups (or members thereof) qua identity groups (or individuals), rather than aiming to liberate them from identity itself. Identity politics fails not because it begins with various subaltern groups and aims at their liberation, but because it ends with them and thus cannot deliver…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 11:16 PM
1

I'm not saying there's a universal black experience. But there is a definite set of black issues. You are kidding right? "I'm not saying that all black men have the same experience, I'm just saying all black men experience the same things." Moronic.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 11:13 PM
22

To me, the person proven to be a liar and without integrity is the least important person and is neither a victim nor a survivor of a trauma (as implied by the idiotic university staff). The important people here are all of the college staff and police whose time and resources she wasted. She is guilty of so much harm here. Guilty of contributing to the made-up rape crisis on college campuses and the atmosphere of frenzied hysteria being promoted by feminists. Of making it that much harder to be…
/r/MensRights10/05/15 12:23 AM
19

Fuck that. Sue for the money. If people are going to live in fear and hysteria, abandoning all reason and common sense, then intelligent people may as well profit from the insanity so things aren't a total loss.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 06:26 PM
1

Beautiful? Not seeing it.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 07:12 PM
2

That graphic is great. I'd never heard that tuxedos are less formal than suits. I would have guessed the opposite, but thinking about it, it makes sense. I remember an episode of 30 Rock where the work day was over and Liz Lemon walked into Alec Baldwin's office. He was wearing a tux and she asked why. He responded "Liz, it's after 5:00pm. What am I? A farmer?"
/r/MensRights18/04/15 01:25 AM
6

But god forbid a man who landed a computer on a comet wear a lucky tiki/pinup shirt on the day of one of his (and humanity's) greatest accomplishments.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 01:12 AM
2

That sounds like a pretty cool dude.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 01:10 AM
1

Is there some sort of published scale of formality? Anything above business suit?
/r/MensRights18/04/15 01:07 AM
5

I had a professor who said to show up 15 minutes early for everything. Some of the best advice I've ever been given.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 01:02 AM
5

The process and cost varies state to state. Federal crimes have a VERY narrow expungement criteria, so in most fed cases the best you can do is get the records sealed.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 01:46 AM
4

What is the difference between experiencing injustice and being a victim? Men are victims of injustice every day, for all of recorded history. We have long been forced to do the laboring, the fighting, the dying, the alimony-paying, the lion's share of the prison-time, the funding of the family unit, the second-class citizen-being when it comes to child custody and family courts, the engineering, the building, and the governing. And what do we get in return? Painted as sexists, pedophiles, misog…
/r/MensRights14/04/15 06:48 PM
1

You have used the TMZ line "I'm a lawyer" in a couple of arguments now. Looking through the guy's history, he prefaces things by saying 'as an attorney' ridiculously often. It comes off as super insecure and pathetic. He tries really hard to convince anonymous redditors of his importance, which is kind of sad, really. Definitely the sign of a weak intellect. A confident, reasoned individual would have no need of such constant boasts and 'Argument from Authority' logical fallacies. Such a person …
/r/MensRights14/04/15 05:14 PM
11

Wow. An appeal to authority, a closed mind, and a total prigish attitude. Have fun looking forward to 'destroying' people. I think I'll stick to exchanges with people looking for reasoned discussion. Oh, and 'As an attorney'? Lol. Try letting your ideas stand on their own merit, and try not to be such a dick.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 11:03 PM
9

It is objectively a terrible contract for men. For some men, signing terrible contracts may be a thing they do, but they should do so knowingly.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 10:03 PM
5

If they believe men and women should be equal, they are already MRAs and they just don't know it.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 09:50 PM
5

It's called 'advice'.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 09:42 PM
3

It's called advice. And damn good, at that.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 09:41 PM
5

And even when you do all of that, it is still possible, if not likely, to be thrown out.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 09:31 PM
3

Priceless.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 07:54 AM
1

All good points. And even counting any time spent performing the listed tasks as 'billable hours', if we also count the same for all the other partner's chores and their hours worked at the traditional job, which partner is putting in more hours? It seems to me it is always likely to be the one who holds the salaried job.
/r/MensRights09/04/15 06:13 AM
4

That's not really the argument he's making, I don't think. Assuming his wife was not there, he would have to pay that much to get the services rendered or go without them. Just for the sake of argument, make it gender neutral. What is the $-value of an average stay-at-home parent? Even going along with the thought exercise, I instinctively feel his numbers are off both in what services would cost and in the time services would take. Certainly $65 an hour for personal shopper is ridiculous. I don…
/r/MensRights09/04/15 05:57 AM
2

No, that's a misrepresentation of the purpose of due process, to fit the definition of victim blaming. Depends upon whom you ask. There is no absolute definition, but there are several different contradicting and competing interpretations commonly espoused. Most of what I see here is about accountability and determining the facts of situations, not victim blaming.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 07:08 PM
2

Feminists have dishonesty used the charge of victim blaming to try to erode due process in order to manipulate the legal system in order to get more convictions. Yes, one of those troublesome alternate definitions they are using.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 07:00 PM
2

Did you even read your own link? Did you note the section labeled 'Opposing Views'? Clearly, the definition and its application are debatable. Never mind that language is fluid, and definitions not necessarily definitive. Often SJW's engage in a linguistic bit of bait and switch wherein they state a minimal definition as fact, expand usage to include edge cases, and then treat it as similarly unchallengeable even in the new context. The notion of 'victim blaming' is often the tool of such intell…
/r/MensRights30/03/15 06:52 PM
2

Which people are those? Citation?
/r/MensRights30/03/15 06:44 PM
2

The definition. According to whom?
/r/MensRights30/03/15 06:40 PM
2

Oh? And who is the arbiter of that particular absolute? I'd call asking for evidence of asserted claims to be reasonable due process, not victim blaming. Feminists tend to feel differently. If there is an absolute definition, they are misusing it.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 06:28 PM
3

So there ARE multiple definitions of victim blaming. Gotcha.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 06:21 PM
2

And who is the arbiter of that particular absolute? I'd call asking for evidence of asserted claims to be reasonable due process, not victim blaming. Feminists tend to feel differently. If there is an absolute definition, they are misusing it.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 06:15 PM
2

Women can already buy sperm today and impregnate themselves. They will still be able to do so and will still be able to have children. They will just no longer exclusively have the capability.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 04:02 PM
31

Artificial wombs will save us. With neuro-jacked vr porn and artificial wombs, female-ness will essentially become irrelevant. Once they lose their ability to control the market on both the sensation of penetrating a vagina and the ability to have children, they will have true equality and literally no special status, rights, or opportunities afforded on account of their gender, as they do today. Essentially the feminist's worst nightmare, brought to you by science.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 06:55 AM
90

Stay single and in control of your income, assets and life! Word.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 04:29 AM
2

I wonder. I suspect I would quickly grow to resent them. Better not to find out.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 05:21 AM
2

No worries there, chief. I'm a hedonist not an insane person. I'll leave the child-rearing to those with the stomach and the time for it.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 05:21 AM
2

Holy hell this makes having kids look miserable. They are kind of gross little bastids.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 03:11 AM
4

horrible arguments said from the mouths of idiots i.e. feminism.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 04:14 AM
8

Girls, girls. You are both pretty and you can both go to the ball.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 04:27 AM
42

Let's get them paying 50% of the alimony (instead of 3%). Let's spread the cancer research funding around evenly -breast cancer research receives 50x the funding as prostate cancer, which kills far more people (but of the wrong gender for funding I guess). As long as we are un-separating the spheres, let's also implement male paternity leave, which will also have the nice effect of making hiring a woman no more costly then a man in that sense. And finally, let's institute equal time for equal cr…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 04:05 AM
2

That's because they are making it up.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 11:09 AM
3

you'll have someone attack you for saying "women don't have perfect lives either" Got an example of this?
/r/MensRights13/03/15 03:30 AM
1

To paraphrase Eddie Murphy, if you have $150 million and you lose half, you still have $75 million. You are still doing pretty good. If you don't have anything, if you are living paycheck to paycheck on $50,000 grand per year, and they take half, you are fucked. You are impoverished. You can't afford to live anywhere that isn't a complete shit hole. Of course only the wealthy can afford the horribly risky proposition of marriage. They are the only ones for whom the men do not risk complete finan…
/r/MensRights12/03/15 01:43 PM
4

According to 2010 Census records, of the 400,000 people receiving spousal support, only 3 percent were men. Lots of marriages fail. Of those that fail and result in alimony situations, it is the man who by and large will be left on the financial hook. The contract of marriage as it exists today is inherently unfair and results in MUCH greater financial risk for men than it does for women. It is, for men, a terrible contract. Smart people don't enter into terrible contracts.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 12:04 AM
4

"It's not always total hell" isn't exactly a ringing endorsement.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 10:40 PM
3

Hell, if 25% of all trips led to such it would still be reasonable.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 10:20 PM
2

I've been dating the same woman for years. I'm good. I see no upside to marriage - all risk.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 10:09 PM
5

Just don't marry a fucking psycho, and you're set. No problem. FTFY.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 09:59 PM
3

If over 50% of all trips outside resulted in such disasters, it would be reasonable.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 09:35 PM
5

35% chance of economic ruin is still no bargain.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 09:32 PM
2

You guys want to go hit up another email chain? This place is dead anyway.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 05:26 AM
5

Festive occasions like email chains...
/r/MensRights25/02/15 05:17 AM
11

Also, don't walk slow and stay behind them because it is creepy and threatening. Matter of fact, don't use sidewalks.
/r/MensRights22/02/15 09:09 AM
2

They suck.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 01:19 AM
3

Some trick. How do you do that?
/r/MensRights18/02/15 01:18 AM
5

Nah. Lacks the satirical snark.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 11:17 PM
1

True. Subscriptions to that sub have quadrupled in a single afternoon. The winds of change are a' blowin'.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 09:21 PM
7

Quite the menifesto.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 08:15 PM
2

Just checked and /r/meninism is a thing. 3 subscribers so far. This thing is really taking off!
/r/MensRights07/02/15 07:02 PM
1

For something to be satire its got to be clearly satire. Some of the best satire in the world has been cleverly disguised and hidden. Honestly, you seem to lack the ability to understand simple literary concepts, so there is really no point continuing here. I may as well try to explain what purple is like to a person who was born blind.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 05:36 PM
1

I just said it.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 05:26 PM
1

It can't be a serious word you want MRA's to describe themselves with while also being a satire of feminists. Yes it can. Words can have multiple meanings. If you can't comprehend this, really no use communicating further as you obviously have a disorder. Best of luck.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 05:23 PM
1

No, it can't be both at the same time. Do you not understand the simple linguistic concept of dual meaning? Are you familiar with puns? Do you know what a play on words is? What a horrible world you must live in to be deprived of these literary elements. To be unable to recognize that things can have multiple meanings suggests that one would lack the ability to comprehend much of what is great about literature. As I sad "unless you don't see a problem with being associated with the ideology of L…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 05:10 PM
1

The beauty is that it can be both. Ain't language grand?
/r/MensRights07/02/15 04:49 PM
1

The heart of your argument boils down to insulting people and that you would rather use another word which is not catchy, does not have the sly play on Leninism (which is a widely disparaged worldview - as modern feminism should be), and rolls off the tounge clumsily as all hell. And again, masculism - the opposite of feminism - is not what we want. We aren't looking for the same hate-filled philosophy with roles reversed, we are looking to point out how hate filled and ridiculous feminism has b…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 04:39 PM
1

Masclulinist is a real word and already existed. Meninist is still a play on Leninist. The literal opposite of feminism would be masclunism. We don't want the literal opposite, do we? MRA isn't looking to be violent or denigrate one sex like modern feminism does. We aren't looking for an exact duplicate of modern, dispicable feminism with simply the roles reversed. We are looking for a true equality movement. And people are too dumb to know what masculinity means? We already had a word called ma…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 04:10 PM
1

It's also a play on Leninist. Really, you're only problem is the way it sounds? Masclunist sounds way more clumsy to me. Much more likely to inspire a reaction of 'Huh?'. Meninist is a pretty clear word, no one makes any mistake about what the subject matter is. I think it is clever as hell the way it has been seized upon, particularly as the word was coined to mock MRAs. It is being 'taken back' as it were. As the violent threats this person has received indicate, it is a pretty powerful weapon…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 03:36 PM
2

It's also a slight play on 'Leninist', which evokes what could be considered a widely disparaged political outlook.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 03:20 AM
1

What's wrong with it? It seems to me like a pretty powerful device for illustrating hypocricy and the violent radicalism of modern feminism.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 03:07 AM
1

A whole what?
/r/MensRights06/02/15 02:01 AM
6

I play in a Pathfinder campaign with a brony "transsexual". Fucking internet, man.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 01:59 AM
4

After that whole debacle, I have a hard time even watching TNG scenes with him. And nothing of value was lost...
/r/MensRights06/02/15 01:56 AM
2

This gig was made for the Cleveland Browns.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 05:39 AM
2

Dem Master Suppression Techniques.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 08:03 PM
5

The key word in your statement is "unambiguously." That's a bit intellectually dishonest, since archaeological evidence only goes back so far. Yes, so you are using something there is no evidence for (and that has been widely discredited) as evidence. The consensus among modern anthropologists and sociologists is that a strictly matriarchal society never existed. Feel free to use pseudo-science and claims for which there are no tangible evidence, but note that they are useless. It is you who com…
/r/MensRights31/12/14 08:06 AM
7

Aren't there myths of warrior women to take into account? Historical cultures where women were the main hunter-gatherers? Name one. Hint: there are no known societies in all of human history that are unambiguously matriarchal. Stop making shit up and presenting fictional nonsense as evidence of anything.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 07:42 AM
1

Explains a lot.
/r/MensRights06/12/14 07:26 AM
3

Yup. Also, dames don't like to be called broads no more.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 06:33 AM
1

They can just polish and reset the diamond and sell it as new.
/r/MensRights30/11/14 04:58 AM
3

I'd love to read that job description.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 01:18 PM
10

Aerodynamics reinforce the patriarchy, Newton's Principia was a rape manual, and relativity is sexist.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 01:13 PM
1

I take that as admission that you are 10 years old.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 10:19 PM
1

What are you, like 10 years old? Grow up. You look like a mental midget here.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 05:16 AM
2

Who the hell thinks a fat wallet looks cool? I've got like 10 credit cards, insurance cards, grocery club cards, business cards, etc. It's a pain in the ass, really. I almost never carry any significant amount of cash. $100 tops and I never put it in my wallet. Don't see a money clip helping in any way. Weird.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 05:07 AM
2

Money clip?
/r/MensRights18/11/14 04:44 AM
1

Because the batshit examples are quickly becoming normalized. NYMag isn't a particularly radical publication. This memeplex is spreading like a cancer and every example needs to be deconstructed and exposed for the intellectual sham that it represents. It's full on cultural war, not a conversation anymore.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 04:47 PM
143

A friend that is a girl gave him the shirt - she is married to someone else, not his girlfriend.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 12:38 PM
2

Yup. /r/mensrights is growing by leaps and bounds and the conversation is getting better and better. Reasonable adults learn a simple lesson early in life that can be generally summed up as 'pick your battles'. The scorched-earth, sex-negative, hate-everything approach by radical feminists is doing more to grow men's rights organizations than anything men do ever could. With every unreasonable campaign like this, fewer and fewer become sympathetic to their cause.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 10:09 PM
2

There were not naked women on the shirt.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 10:07 PM
2

Wild.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 07:49 PM
2

Reddit doesn't let you link to Twitter? What's the thinking there?
/r/MensRights16/11/14 07:42 PM
1

Link?
/r/MensRights16/11/14 07:33 PM
1

What industry do you work in?
/r/MensRights16/11/14 07:32 PM
0

And you can't be critical of Islam either, so be sure to stop the subjugation of women in theocracies without criticizing those who support the theocracies.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 07:30 PM
7

Actually, most of the feminists I've seen complaining about this said things like 'cry me a river', 'fuck his crocodile tears', 'he deserves to be a victim', etc. They did anything but accept his apology and move on.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 03:30 PM
3

Pretty amazingly written. This dude nailed it.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 03:25 PM
23

No doubt. If she starts selling them I'll buy a few. I would love it if she got rich behind this.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 04:06 PM
15

It's all about context. The shirt is an expression of Tiki/Rockabilly/Pinup art culture, features 'gunner girls' of the type seen in the WWII era, and is consistent with an art form and perspective that I personally find appealing and interesting. Google those art types, some pretty cool stuff comes up. As early as 1869, women have been supporters of the pin-up, arguing the content serves as "positive post-Victorian rejection of bodily shame and a healthy respect for female beauty". It is a form…
/r/MensRights14/11/14 05:34 PM
3

Yeah, unfortunately I think you may be right. She barely was able to win in Massachusetts. She was looking real good on Bill Maher a few weeks ago though. Just listening to her talk is awesome. I'd love to see her go head-to-head in the primaries with Hillary though.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 05:12 AM
9

Democrat turnout was pathetic. It's a complicated, multi-faceted system, but by my read many ardent liberals are turning, if not right, to apathetic. The left has become a mix of conservatism-light and SJW extremism. I know it's turned me off. In 2012 I was yelling from the mountain-tops to vote blue, now both sides are turning my stomach and I can't bring myself to endorse the Dems anymore. EDIT: Although Warren/Sanders is still my dream ticket.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 11:38 PM
7

That's my point. People who would otherwise be liberals are being completely turned off by the extremism. You know you've gone batshit crazy when the right starts looking more reasonable and tolerant to a logical person. SJW-ism is having the opposite of its intended effect. The more radical they get, the more people they lose, including on the middling, reasonable issues. Tell me the Earth should be purged of men and then hope I turn up to support your tolerance rally. Awesome strategy.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 11:31 PM
13

This. The left is destroying itself with SJW-ism. It's gone far past being about equality and become radical, nonsensical hatred. I'm not surprised they got their asses handed to them in the midterms. It's entirely off-putting.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 11:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter