TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dam_the_beavers Archive

View 0 posts and 72 comments by dam_the_beavers on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Pathetic to use punctuation correctly or pathetic to clarify what someone is saying to make sure I understand it? I’d imagine based on your replies that both of those concepts are foreign to you, so it’s really 50/50 at this point.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/20 05:10 PM
0

That’s why I used italics and not quotations and then put a question mark at the end. I was clarifying what he said and asking if that’s what he meant, since that seemed to be what he was implying. See how punctuation works?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/20 04:55 PM
-1

So no men talk that way about women? Laughable. Speaking in absolute is ridiculous either way.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/20 04:34 PM
1

But how will this sub circle jerk about how terrible women are then?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/20 04:00 PM
0

Did you mean some women?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/20 03:59 PM
0

A: Toxic A: Abuser A: Rapist It’s actually not that hard, every woman I know would give the same answers.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/20 03:58 PM
-4

“Like very few women say about us” FTFY The hypocrisy in that sentence is kind of shocking.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/20 03:56 PM
-4

Did you mean some women?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/11/20 03:54 PM
0

Ironic that you’ve replied this way to a joke.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/10/20 10:18 AM
-1

It generally conveys sarcasm or mocking tone.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/10/20 02:55 PM
0

Oh, I didn’t know we were getting our opinions about women from memes now.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/10/20 01:23 PM
1

Stretching like they just woke up from the world’s longest nap.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/10/20 06:30 AM
-2

I honestly don’t know what “fEmALeS” y’all are hanging out with. I don’t know any women like this.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/10/20 06:27 AM
4

You should meet some other girls.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/10/20 06:24 AM
0

It’s the rabid misogyny.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/07/20 01:13 PM
1

r/untrustworthypoptarts
/r/PussyPassDenied23/04/20 01:36 PM
1

Also which is it? 30+% of women don’t make more than their husbands? Or it’s not normal so it causes divorce? Arguing the latter only reinforces the former, so at least pick which facts you’re choosing to ignore and stick with it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/03/20 11:37 PM
1

⁠Usa today is self reported...great scientific study.... You’ll find if you actually read some of the articles I posted that studies show that men actually over report earnings and women under report earnings based on comparing tax data and self reported numbers. Also, I said 10 articles, not 10 scientific studies, so stop moving the goal post. ⁠KSL Not working. I updated the link in my edit ⁠NPR shows that CURRENT marriages they make more but the leads to much higher divorce rates which is exac…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/03/20 11:17 PM
1

6. US News & World Report, 2018 7. US Census Bureau, 2018 8. The Economist, 2018 9. Forbes, 2015 10. Fox Business, 2020
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/03/20 11:07 PM
1

In what way does my current link not work? And do you want me to provide all 10 articles? Ok then! 1. USA Today, 2020 2. KSL 3. NPR, 2015 4. Business Insider, 2019 5. The Atlantic, 2019 I’ll be back with the other 5 shortly, just didn’t want to risk losing my progress. Edit: for some reason the KSL article keeps redirecting so here it is
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/03/20 10:35 PM
1

How about you find it yourself since I’m the only one to actually provide any verifiable information here, or do you have something against equal contribution? That being said, here you go
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/03/20 10:17 PM
-2

Yeah, I’m sure these are the only 2 testimonies you’ve ever deliberately ignored. A simple google search gave me about 10 articles that give a range anywhere from 30-50% of women in the US out-earning their partners.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/03/20 09:55 PM
-1

Guess you’re just ignoring every response that doesn’t fit your narrative.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/03/20 09:00 PM
0

Believe me or don’t, it’s the truth. My best friend is a senior social media manager and her husband is a stay at home dad. He wasn’t working before the baby either. My other bestie is a lawyer. I did think of one good friend where the woman pays less than half, they’re lesbians. This also includes the vast majority of my aunts and female cousins as well, and I’m seriously wracking my brain to come up with “non-exceptions.” I did come up with one of my uncles and one of my female cousins, but bo…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/03/20 07:10 PM
-6

Literally every one of my female friends are also the breadwinners in their relationships. I can’t think of a single couple I know where the man pays for more than 50%. It’s not an exception by any means.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/03/20 06:54 PM
-13

I pay for much more than 50% of all those things than my husband does. Y’all are incredibly out of touch with reality.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen21/03/20 06:15 PM
0

It’s frustrating when people completely misunderstand your position and make sweeping judgments about you because of a small but vocal minority of assholes, isn’t it? You could literally apply every single thing you’ve said to feminism. For the record, I think there’s merit to a good number of men’s rights issues, I just think projecting feminist politics on to videos like this is unproductive and misguided and that’s all I’ve said from the beginning. You have a good one too.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 01:10 AM
0

There is a very small, very loud minority of women who call themselves feminists and also don’t understand what it is. I know an overwhelming number of actual “modern feminists” and none of them would defend the actions in this video. I’m not going to defend any of the lunatics that misunderstand feminism, regardless of their gender. But you have to see the irony in the vast majority of the comments here. Men Getting Triggered Over Women aren’t doing themselves any favors by spouting just as muc…
/r/MensRights23/02/20 11:49 PM
0

actual egalitarianism and some ideal that doesn't involve blatant sexism in either direction Congratulations, you’ve defined feminism perfectly.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 09:28 PM
-2

For a bunch of people who are upset about irrational, ignorant, misdirected aggression over gender inequality...these guys sure have a lot of irrational, ignorant, misdirected aggression over gender inequality.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 08:47 PM
-5

It already went where it was going and you missed it. I wasn’t unclear. It’s not ok or acceptable, and it also has nothing to do with feminism.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 08:03 PM
-15

Did I say it was perfectly normal and acceptable? Spoiler: I didn’t.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 05:52 PM
-24

Y’all are reading A LOT of politics into this clip. This is not feminism, none of these people are feminists or claiming to be feminists. Can you project any harder?
/r/MensRights23/02/20 05:30 PM
1

Campuses? No, I’m a grown adult woman so I’m not spending a lot of time on campuses ever since I graduated in my twenties. I’m spending time with actual other grown adult women who identify as feminists, including myself. You’re an absolute moron. And I suggest you put down the thesaurus and stop trying to use words you don’t know the meaning of. Why don’t you give “poignant” a quick google, lmfao. Nice try, you dumb twat. You don’t sound smart, but if you’re gonna try at least look up the words…
/r/PussyPassDenied22/05/19 03:26 PM
2

I’m sorry that the whole of your human interaction begins and ends with the internet. What you’re describing is not feminism and I don’t know a single feminist who fits in whatever crazy box you’re talking about. Using the word “cuck” really invalidates your whole argument and strips you of any respect I might have had for you. Try not to be such a cunt.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/19 11:57 PM
0

I’m not the one making sweeping, generalized, completely inaccurate, ignorant statements about another group of people, you giant donkey dick.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/19 09:11 PM
0

You seem really proud of your ignorance, good luck with that.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/05/19 01:11 AM
0

I just did. You clearly have never met an actual feminist.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/19 02:00 PM
0

Wrong. There is no private definition of feminism and this is not “fair.”
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/19 03:00 PM
-2

I asked for a single source and you sent me 3 paragraphs of no sources.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/19 02:59 PM
0

Sauce?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/19 06:30 AM
2

I’m considering no longer using the words “literally” and “feminism” because nobody knows what they mean anymore.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/19 06:29 AM
2

Engaging with you, I’m increasingly reminded of this brilliant quote by Jean-Paul Sartre about anti-Semites: “Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reas…
/r/PussyPassDenied13/05/19 04:53 PM
1

You want to double check those dates there buddy? He starts dictation in July 1941. Also, dictation does not invalidate writings. Furthermore, plenty of diaries are considered proper primary historical sources. Do you honestly know anything about history? And your final argument is “so what if they did kill the Jews, they were the enemy”? Wow. Yeah, you sound smart. Color me disproven.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/05/19 04:18 PM
1

Your entire argument about his own writing is he probably didn’t write it or he didn’t mean it or it’s unreliable? You’re a walking stereotype. Nobody’s diary is “unreliable,” you absolute moron. And especially not in the context of his diary, which was a meticulous exercise in record-keeping, not some schoolgirl’s log of crushes. He was a grown man and journalist keeping 20+ volume records. Nobody keeping a personal journal thinks it’s important enough to preserve in a vault. It was history to …
/r/PussyPassDenied13/05/19 03:43 PM
1

You’re a fucking joke.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/05/19 03:27 PM
2

And just for good measure, let me give you a more comprehensive overview of his personal mention of the extermination and liquidation of Jews throughout his personal diaries. If you’d like to read up on his diaries, you’ll find he kept meticulous notes (nearly 20 volumes by 1941) and that he himself considered them so valuable that he had them moved to underground vaults in Berlin for their preservation. Jan 21 - May 23, 1942 (excepting Mar 22-25, Apr 10) February 5 The Jewish question is again …
/r/PussyPassDenied12/05/19 08:31 PM
2

His diary. Dated February 14th, and March 27th, 1942, respectively. And if you’d like a little more context, the first quote begins, “The Führer once again expressed his determination to clean up the Jews in Europe pitilessly. There must be no squeamish sentimentalism about it.” Why don’t you pick up a book and learn something, you ignorant little shit. Please give me any fucking context in which these quotes are acceptable. I stand by my judgment that there’s nothing I can show you that will en…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/05/19 08:14 PM
2

“The Jews have deserved the catastrophe that has now overtaken them. Their destruction will go hand in hand with the destruction of our enemies. We must hasten this process with cold ruthlessness.” - Joseph Goebbels “A judgment is being visited upon the Jews that, while barbaric, is fully deserved by them. The prophecy which the Führer made about them for having brought on a new world war is beginning to come true in a most terrible manner. One must not be sentimental in these matters. If we did…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/05/19 08:04 PM
2

Nothing I show you or say to you is going to make a difference because you’re human garbage, so I’ll save myself the time and effort, and you can go fuck yourself instead.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/05/19 04:11 AM
2

You called the fucking Minister of Propaganda for Nazi Germany a hero. How are you NOT a Nazi? Maybe you didn’t read the part where told you to suck a fat dick, you disgusting Nazi fuck.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/05/19 11:35 PM
2

You’re the fucking joke here. Fuck you, you Nazi fuck.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/05/19 05:23 PM
1

It’s a troll
/r/PussyPassDenied11/05/19 11:26 AM
2

Suck a fat dick
/r/PussyPassDenied11/05/19 11:23 AM
7

Yes, him and the 65 people who upvoted him. That or the confirmation bias is real.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/05/19 11:20 AM
1

I guess I just feel like it’s pretty shortsighted to believe your particular brand of prejudice is more justified. I remember many years ago watching a documentary on Apartheid. When the (American) interviewer asked a South African police officer why he had decided to come forward with his crimes, he said something to the effect of, “I was watching Mississippi burning, which is about your Apartheid...” Until that moment, as aware as I thought I was, it never even occurred to me that what we had …
/r/MensRights21/04/19 11:13 AM
1

Ok, fair enough. I often find that the people who argue that feminism is defined by how it’s practiced are the same people that argue racism is devoid of context and stand by its dictionary definition. There is definitely a flaw in the logic of identifying feminism only by its dictionary definition and not by how it’s practiced. But I also believe feminism at its core is rooted in equality, and as a person who knows an awful lot of feminists, I have yet to meet one who actually believes that wom…
/r/MensRights18/04/19 08:23 AM
1

Ok, there’s a lot to digest here. Without knowing exactly which Slavic country you’re from, I can’t know the particular history you’re referring to. But I can say that while “race” is not embedded in Eastern European history like it is in American history, every country or culture at some point in its history has an “other.” What is racism for us is probably more accurately described as xenophobia for your country. A fear-based dislike of refugees or migrants is at very least similar to racism. …
/r/MensRights18/04/19 08:13 AM
1

Out of curiosity, do you feel the same way about the dictionary definition of racism?
/r/MensRights18/04/19 06:26 AM
0

Right, cuz r/FoundTheN00b isn’t the exact definition of this comment.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 06:01 AM
-1

Dictionaries are cool. Check one out some time.
/r/MensRights17/04/19 06:09 PM
-4

Oh sorry, did I invade your safe space?
/r/MensRights17/04/19 05:51 PM
2

Ah, gotcha. Indeed that is some fuckery.
/r/MensRights17/04/19 04:48 AM
-28

That’s the exact opposite of feminism but ok.
/r/MensRights17/04/19 04:36 AM
6

If I’m not mistaken, charges were pressed.
/r/MensRights17/04/19 04:15 AM
1

I'm sorry, have I disagreed with you once about anything other than the fact that all feminists are not man haters? Yeah...guess my mind is made up about that...how ignorant and closed minded of me. It's bizarre that you would argue with someone who's trying to sympathize with you. Seems like you're so used to having the same argument over and over again that you've made one where it doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 09:50 PM
1

Honestly, I'd really like to get on board with men's rights. There are valid points made in OP's post, and I'm truly sorry that they're not being properly addressed. We do need to come together for true equality and for the rights of all people. As a feminist (in the true sense of the word and not this overly simplified nonsense) - someone who has nothing but the utmost respect for men and for people as a whole, as someone who wants true equality, that is pro-rights for all people, what you're s…
/r/MensRights20/05/17 08:41 PM
1

You didn't say all feminists believe in patriarchy theory. You said all feminists vilify men, which is what I took issue with. I don't want to argue semantics but please take responsibility for your own words.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 02:27 AM
2

We're talking about feminism because OP brought it up actually, that's what this entire post is in reference to. Patriarchy "theory" does not vilify men - it acknowledges the historical fact that men held dominion over women. Feminism rose in reaction to this system. While I agree that there is a large group of feminists that have lost sight of the original vision - one of equality - you are doing the exact same thing by asserting that "all feminists" are any one thing. Not all men in a patriarc…
/r/MensRights20/05/17 01:49 AM
1

If it's the latter I'll direct you back to OP's initial comment about what feminists used to be. How we get so far from the point in a single thread is beyond me. The irony that you're in a men's rights sub talking about women's rights groups in the exact same way men's rights groups are fed up with being treated is not lost on me and I hope it's not lost on you either. The cycle has to end somewhere.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 04:06 PM
1

This is either sarcasm or the kind of generalization that men's rights groups hate about "feminism." At least when it's directed towards "all men."
/r/MensRights19/05/17 03:59 PM
1

The feminists you speak of with fond memory haven't disappeared. Please stop grouping us all together. Man-haters are not feminists by definition, no matter what they choose to call themselves. I'd like feminism back please.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 04:53 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter