TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

damnbiker Archive

View 8 posts and 185 comments by damnbiker on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Kudos to her for standing up for her son!
/r/MensRights20/05/15 11:24 PM
2

Kale is oppression of women! We need to fight the Katriarchy and recognize that women, AND ONLY WOMEN, are beautiful no matter what they eat! If you aren't drooling over pictures of the chubby girls, you are promoting kale culture! Also, WTF happened in 2006?!
/r/MensRights12/05/15 10:12 PM
5

Me too. I eat a cup of it chopped, with my breakfast every morning.
/r/MensRights12/05/15 06:34 PM
2

Exactly. The right thing to d would be to contact the store manager and have him coach the employee. If the manager refuses, write to corporate HQ. It's normal to be upset by these kind of things, but you have to take the right approach toward it.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 12:09 PM
64

Ya, I thought that was one of the most offensive things this dink said.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/04/15 01:24 AM
-2

Hi, I just re-read the article and, to be completely honest, I don't see it stating that men have it better then women. It said there was a gender gap, that the gap was narrowing and that they want to make cycling a choice more women will make by making the roads safer for cyclists. If I'm missing something, and I am being sincere here; let me know. The article said that more women ride along Harbord. Harbord does have a really nice bike lane. I really don't see it though. I think what they were…
/r/MensRights23/03/15 07:56 PM
3

Yeah, I'm not sure why this is a men's rights issue. She is making an observation about women's riding habits (we could argue about their validity) but isn't looking to reduce the number of men riding, she's looking to increase the number of women riders by making the roads in Toronto safer for cycling. As a man who cycles in Toronto, I appreciate this effort and fully support it.
/r/MensRights23/03/15 06:44 PM
3

This behaviour is only attributed to men, never women. Oh...wait http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/middle-aged-moms-flocking-new-moon-chance-recapture-fantasies-teen-romance-article-1.416114
/r/MensRights22/02/15 08:32 PM
163

Fucking hell, I'm the last one to be one of those "Oh, poor white male me" types. But seriously, they're complaining, because some of the people that are involved in these organizations are passionate enough about the issues to end up leading the charge, and are white men? White guys should stick to tea party rallies, oil companies and private clubs, where they light Cuban cigars with underprivileged children of colour and say "Harumph! Harumph!" a lot! Us white guys are people, not straw men. W…
/r/MensRights04/02/15 12:39 PM
2

"...in a campaign organized at least in part by a website affiliated with A Voice For Men, central arm of the misogynistic men's rights movement. On the other side of the political spectrum, outlets like feminist geek website The Mary Sue also got in on the game." Well, at least they're implying that feminists are man haters. That's equality, I guess. (bold put in there by me)
/r/MensRights04/02/15 12:39 AM
3

I have to spread my legs on a bus because I'm tall and they don't provide enough leg room. I wonder when we'll see the campaign "No Lady Bagging". Oh yeah, never.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 04:53 PM
5

Okay, but is it only men that commit violence against women? There has never been any woman on woman violent act committed, ever?
/r/MensRights10/01/15 01:43 PM
98

Rawr! I've got bear hands!
/r/PussyPassDenied17/12/14 09:03 PM
2

I guess Time's polls aren't open to people who look at certain web sites or have opinions that Time doesn't want to print. Basically, their opinions don't count, because...well. just because.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 11:12 PM
2

Unfortunately, $2000 is the maximum fine for careless driving in Ontario. What is interesting is that the story didn't mention anything about a driver's license suspension. A careless charge can also carry a 2 year suspension of your driver's license. I find it difficult to believe that a JotP would order the maximum fine, but not impose any license suspension.
/r/PussyPass30/10/14 09:24 PM
1

She was charged with Careless Driving, which is not an indictable offence. Had they decided to charge her with Dangerous Driving, that is the one you usually go to jail for. There wasn't any mention of alcohol, drugs, distracted driving, speeding or anything else that would indicate gross negligence which would be associated with manslaughter. It could be something as unfortunate as accidentally running a red light. Do we really expect jail time for all traffic accidents?
/r/PussyPass30/10/14 01:33 AM
39

Asking once is asking. Asking five times because you didn't like the first four answers is nagging.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 05:09 PM
2

It is definitely possible to give children too much freedom over themselves.
/r/PussyPass14/10/14 12:24 PM
0

I'm not always talking about exploiting children. It just happens to be applicable in this case. When it comes to kids, I think we should err on the side of caution with our judgements.
/r/PussyPass12/10/14 02:58 AM
0

They were recruited as children, who were convinced to run away from home to get married off to Jihadists. Not so much of a pussy pass as it is exploitation of children.
/r/PussyPass11/10/14 04:24 PM
7

No sources for the info, and they base claims on all homocide victims by gender of attacker.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 04:04 PM
14

I always think of this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ikd0ZYQoDko
/r/PussyPass09/10/14 11:02 AM
3

There was no reporting on any actual facts f the story. What brought the people there, what issues they were concerned about, what they were actually saying, just a nice dehumanizing story about a hat. I'm sad to see this being passed off as reporting. The "reporter" went in with a bias, and carried that bias into the "story". The report provides the reader with no information other than the feelings of one person.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 10:34 AM
5

Not really a gender induced sentence reduction. Reduced because it was beyond the maximum allowable sentence for the conviction. Still unfortunate, she's scum and shouldn't be allowed to walk amongst free people.
/r/PussyPass29/09/14 03:18 PM
1

Or using two hands to take a picture?
/r/MensRights16/09/14 11:43 AM
4

If you wife is yelling at you to the point of leaving you in tears in the middle of a room, you are in an abusive relationship. The lack of compassion she has shown for you is a good indicator that, although you may love her, she does not feel the same for you. She probably loves being in a relationship Leave. Lawyer up. Hit the gym. Delete Facebook.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 11:03 PM
1

It's pretty easy to see how treating women like men could be seen as misogyny. Men get pretty rough treatment across the board. How many all woman moving companies are there? How many all female mining operations? Demolition teams? These are not things that feminism strive for, and is percisely why I don't believe that feminism is actually interested in equality. Equality must be equality at all levels, not just the board room, but the loading dock and factory floor. And the "easy jobs" shouldn'…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 03:33 PM
1

How are they going to eat if they never cook? I have to cook all the time. That's how I eat, by cooking stuff. And then putting it in my mouth.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 03:18 PM
1

Silly patriarchy type! Men aren't victims of IPV. Men are perpatrators of IPV. Because Patriarchy. If women use violence against men, it's a preemptive defence, not an attack. /s http://np.reddit.com/r/FeMRADebates/comments/2fsaef/victims_no_more_girls_fight_back_against_male/
/r/MensRights10/09/14 03:16 PM
8

"Best interest of the child". My question is, which child? For four years, the state has decided that one child is financially responsible for another child because the older child was a victim of rape!
/r/PussyPass03/09/14 04:22 PM
7

Ruining a man financially for a child that isn't his: "we are concerned about the best interest of the child" Woman kills two children and tries for a third: "well, we can't really hold her responsible"
/r/PussyPass27/08/14 01:46 PM
1

I'd like to see a corroborating report from a more reputable group before I cite the findings from this study. The Fraser Group, IMO, lacks credibility and integrity in their reporting. I'm not saying I disagree with everything they say, I just wouldn't cite their findings in an arguement.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 02:18 PM
13

I'm shocked that they didn't charge her husband for getting shot.
/r/PussyPass19/07/14 10:06 AM
19

"Prosecutors are appealing a decision by an Oakland County judge to release a woman on bond who was convicted of shooting her lover after he fell short in bed and she accused him of cheating on her." Woman doesn't orgasm, man is inadequate. Man doesn't orgasm, man is inadequate.
/r/PussyPass19/07/14 02:20 AM
10

Of course not. What are you, new?
/r/PussyPass19/07/14 02:17 AM
1

It's me! I'm teh 14 year old son! It's all teh truez! Seriously and stuff! She wants to slice up my weenie!!!1!one!! This story reminds me of the time I spent on a dairy farm. Smells like BS. A doctor can't perform a medically unnecessary procedure on an unwilling patient. Even if the Dr. tried, can you imagine what you would do, as a 14 year old boy, if someone was coming at your wedding tackle with a knife? At the very least, you'd move it around so it wouldn't get cut. What, are we supposed t…
/r/MensRights17/07/14 06:59 PM
19

http://i.imgur.com/YjNruid.jpg
/r/PussyPass11/07/14 10:39 AM
12

Shaddup or we're taking pictures of your wang next! You know...just in case you're some kind of pervert too.
/r/PussyPass09/07/14 07:03 PM
32

I like how the prosecutor gave the teen a choice: Plead guilty, or we'll force you to have an erection and then take pictures of it. Yeah, the 17 year old boy with an age appropriate girlfriend is the pervert here... /s
/r/PussyPass09/07/14 06:51 PM
75

I can just see the parent's reaction to the police request: "Let me get this straight: you want to take my child to the hospital, where you intend to force him to have an erection, so that you can take pictures of it...because you think HE is a pervert?" "Yes." "Get out of my house."
/r/PussyPass09/07/14 06:48 PM
1

I think we can all agree that this 8 year old boy NEEDS TO BE LOCKED THE FUCK UP! Sick bugger is interested in 14 year old girls. Had this been his middle aged teacher, then everything would have been okay, amiright? /s
/r/MensRights09/07/14 10:51 AM
2

She'll not see more than two years.
/r/PussyPass07/07/14 10:19 PM
2

taxpayer funded. Why weren't the reporters allowed for something they helped pay for?
/r/MensRights07/07/14 02:50 AM
1

Didn't see that or I would have indicated the X-post. Read some of the comments there, seems to be some similar opinions. And yes, I realize that this is the Daily Fail, but it still is a main stream media outlet.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 12:12 AM
2

When ever you read a news story that seems a bit hateful, reverse the genders. Then ask yourself: "would this have been published with the reversed genders?" Imagine a guy, travelling to a foreign country, complaining about the "less than average" women getting handsome men and the women's resulting 'inflated egos'. Then displaying the racist attitudes toward the locals that they dated. Would a main stream media organization DARE to print something as offensive?
/r/MensRights05/07/14 04:23 PM
1

Yeah, you'd think so. Maybe, since Beijing is such a modern area, there is a more equal male female ratio than in more rural areas.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 04:07 PM
7

I know, I was reading this and kept thinking "she must just be a nightmare". Describing Asian men as "a fitting replacement for my ‘yetis’ – they differed from what Western society deemed conventionally attractive". Fucking seriously? The entire male population of Beijing? Or maybe just the two that were unlucky enough to cross her path. And then there was the jab at Western men as well "However, unlike the majority of Western women living in China, who watch bitterly as the egos of below-averag…
/r/MensRights05/07/14 12:06 PM
6

Then I guess the women will be shaving their faces on a daily basis too? Don't get me wrong, the whole cosmetics and grooming industry is pretty baffling and many of these 'necessities' were completely manufactured (this includes under arm deodorant too BTW). It's not just a gender thing to have a 'need' manufactured by an industry either. It's just easier to target that way. Engagement rings are another example of this manufactured need. Once again though, we see "gender studies" being actually…
/r/MensRights04/07/14 10:25 PM
6

C'mon, we know men and boys can't be raped by women. They consent by their gender. /s
/r/MensRights04/07/14 08:28 PM
9

Not shaving =/= shaving your entire body. Helps if you read Title IX
/r/MensRights04/07/14 07:51 PM
17

Let's check our sources for this article. This study was published in "Sex Roles a Journal of Research". Here's a description of the Journal: "Sex Roles: A Journal of Research is an interdisciplinary behavioral science journal offering a feminist perspective. It publishes original research reports and review articles that illuminate the underlying processes and consequences of gender role socialization, gendered perceptions and behaviors, and gender stereotypes. The range of topics is broad, ext…
/r/MensRights04/07/14 06:27 PM
6

This is a Title IX infringement. No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. If women get extra credit for not shaving their armpits, then so must men.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 06:11 PM
-1

Not if you watch news coverage regarding gun control. Then the conservatives pundits start trotting out the vidya game shame.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 04:29 PM
3

I don't know, it's an extrodinary measure for a judge to take. Normally you'd just expect a minimum sentence or something.
/r/PussyPass25/06/14 11:07 AM
4

Wow, that seems like some pretty extreme measures. Not really enough info to go on to know if it was a legit decision or a PP though.
/r/PussyPass24/06/14 08:48 PM
2

Florida, I am disappoint. Where's the bonkers, irrational stupidity that we've all come to know and love from you?
/r/MensRights24/06/14 07:20 PM
1

Reptilian American
/r/MensRights18/06/14 01:59 AM
3

I just noticed that there is "outrage" tag attached to the headline, when seen from a list. I can assure you that it was not me who put it there. I find it interesting, and a little disturbing, that it gets tagged in such a way. Does anyone know how or why this happens?
/r/MensRights18/06/14 01:36 AM
1

PC term for Lizard man?
/r/MensRights18/06/14 12:30 AM
2

Wow. Moral of the story: If you know someone you don't like, go on a vacation with them to Finland.
/r/PussyPass17/06/14 11:44 PM
2

The full quote: "The gunmen went door to door in the Kenyan costal town, demanding to know if the men inside were Muslim and if they spoke Somali. If the extremists did not like the answers, they opened fire, witnesses said on Monday." This implies that they may have been indiscriminant in their violence. This article does not specifically mention that only men were killed until 6 paragraphs in, describing in a gender neutral manner until then. So why am I mentioning this, in an appropriate sub?…
/r/MensRights17/06/14 11:21 PM
59

Well, she did wait two whole years.
/r/PussyPass17/06/14 11:10 PM
2

I'm not denying that there is inherent misogyny present in the actions of these religious extremists. There absolutely is. What I am pointing out is how the story is being reported. The only reference in the story is that they wanted to know if the men spoke Somali. Every reference after that to violence is gender neutral until 6 paragraphs into the story. As this point is not relevant to the content of the story, but to the reporting of the story; I am posting about it in this subreddit, not th…
/r/MensRights17/06/14 11:04 PM
2

Nothing I didn't already know in that video, but the presentation was certainly well done and really drove the point home. Thanks for the link.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 08:00 PM
2

Of course it's tragic, but the actual story is that men are being killed. If both men and women were being murdered, then it would be logical and reasonable to report that people were killed. If women were the sole victims ofthis tragedy, then the story would take on a different context, one of religious based oppression of women. Why then is violence, directed solely at men, gender neutral? In truth, it takes on a different, and arguable more acccurate, view of things to report what actually ha…
/r/MensRights17/06/14 06:27 PM
124

Seems perfectly fair. From the victim's perspective that's like a quarter of a life time. Besides, women aren't rapists or sex offenders.
/r/PussyPass17/06/14 05:40 PM
3

http://images.wikia.com/dragonball/images/0/0a/I_don%27t_want_to_live_on_this_planet_anymore.jpg
/r/PussyPass17/06/14 04:52 PM
15

Shenanigans! I'm calling shenanigans on this article. Can't be real. Funny, but not real; right? Oh, please tell me I'm right on this one.
/r/PussyPass17/06/14 04:36 PM
3

From this day onward, I decree that "Jesus Fuck!" shall be default expression for burning your fingers with a cigarette.
/r/PussyPass17/06/14 04:17 PM
5

stuff like taking psilocybin mushrooms, and the confusion over "gender roles" and gender identity was too convoluted to begin with. I also noticed there were people who took my openness about my situation as an opportunity to Missed the first post, but +1 for mushrooms :)
/r/MensRights17/06/14 03:23 PM
14

"She did not intend to kill him, nor did she know that her actions were likely to cause his death, but she did intend to stab him,” Wait, you mean poking holes in people can kill them? How was I supposed to know that?
/r/PussyPass17/06/14 01:19 PM
1

Relevnt: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onNBxynagXE
/r/MensRights16/06/14 10:38 AM
2

So, if you're a gay man, and you're not yet out, and not ready to be; that'll cost you $99?
/r/MensRights11/06/14 10:23 PM
0

"Man" is actually a 16 year old boy.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 10:37 PM
23

At the end: "..and she was the one that was arrested." Says the surprised newscaster. Yes, the woman who assulted the child was arrested. I know it's shocking, since the child was male, and everything.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 10:32 PM
94

TL;DR Men say they are doing chores, women say they aren't, therefore men aren't doing household chores.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 08:35 PM
1

my apologies, is there any way to edit the link?
/r/MensRights23/05/14 04:02 PM
-1

But, is that the bar that we want to aim for? Really?
/r/PussyPass23/05/14 03:39 PM
3

That's pretty awesome. I've thought about trying yoga but the whole class idea made me feel uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 10:49 PM
1

Okay, let's do the math here. Let's say she waited until she was about 12 years old before she started having run-ins with the police. On average, she would have had 6 weeks a year when she didn't have a run in with the police. Every year. For a decade.
/r/PussyPass03/05/14 11:47 PM
1

Hey, there's a sock for every foot. I hope he finds his partner in footwear.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 09:03 PM
1

Right you are, I misread that. Well then, fuck everything about that prof.
/r/MensRights27/10/13 02:20 AM
3

So, this student is opposed to gay marriage, and while I disagree with the student she obviously participated in the class. She received the zero grade because this student failed of allow herself to become indcotrinated in a way her professor thought appropriate. This is the real problem here, universities should be places where differing opinions are not just allowed, but encouraged. These students are adults, free to believe whatever they want, regardless of whether or not I, or a professor, …
/r/MensRights25/10/13 09:00 PM
2

Wow. Just fuckin' wow. Also, PBW? Wow! Just wow...words escape me. I feel for the PBW guy for so many reasons. Married to a harpie. A harpie that puts a camera in the bathroom. And is disgusted by his PBWs. Not my cup-o-tea, but if he likes it, let him do it. Wow. EDIT I apologise in advance, but I just had to: http://imgur.com/kRChm7C
/r/MensRights14/10/13 12:29 PM
3

I know that they mentioned the Bureau of Labor, but what I want to know is: has anyone verified this? I took a quick look at their site and couldn't find breakdown by gender. I'm not sure why you're coming off as defensive, I'm just suspicious as to motives when I see statistics that sound odd and are difficult to verify. As for the arguement of "if men walked away" the same can be said of both genders for a variety of occupations. The bottom line is I don't see that ever happening. I believe th…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 08:54 PM
3

That may be true, but Canada and the US aren't so different. I'd still like to see a second source or verification of the first source.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 10:56 AM
1

No, but at the power plant that I work at I can tell you that the numbers are quite a bit more than 1%. Now I'm not certain what specific position this article is referring to, but there are a large number of people working in Operations at my plant and quite a few of these Operators are women. Anytime I see statistics stating that 100% of anything is this or that is male, I have to question that validity of the data and the intention of the article itself. We have enough to work on already with…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 08:59 AM
1

In Canada, for power plants, I can definitely say that the 100% of operators being male is not the case.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 10:53 PM
4

What gave you that idea?
/r/MensRights13/09/13 01:58 PM
7

The first comment had some interesting points. The divorce comment is just stupid. How many divorces are caused by other sex toys like vibrators or fleshlights?
/r/MensRights26/08/13 03:39 PM
-1

Top right...shudder
/r/MensRights23/08/13 12:40 AM
22

What would you call the fence around a prison? A freedom wall?
/r/MensRights22/08/13 08:09 AM
28

I don't know, he probably should be able to. He could sue for the four years that he was unable to earn a living as well as pain and suffering, and defamation. $90,000 over a four year period is only $22,500 a year, and that's assuming she actually ends up paying and not declaring bankruptcy or something.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:50 PM
66

That, and how about comparing her life to his. This man was taken away by armed men and LOCKED IN A FUCKING CAGE FOR FOUR YEARS! Her life wasn't wrecked, she experienced some guilt, but not enough to come forward until she decided to become religious. I guessing her line of thinking was "oh shit, now that I believe all this Jesus stuff, I might go to hell if I don't 'fess up."
/r/MensRights21/08/13 09:39 PM
2

Wait, I just want to get one thing straight: PEOPLE STILL BUY NUDIE MAGS?! Hello, 1985 calling...can we please have our publication method back?
/r/MensRights16/08/13 03:06 PM
2

+1 here buddy!
/r/MensRights07/08/13 12:02 AM
1

Being employed in the tech sector makes you priviliged? It also means you probably had to work your ass off at something too. Also, fuck you for being tall. Who gives a crap about stupid made up shit like this, though?
/r/MensRights04/08/13 11:55 PM
1

So the woman with the phone in her hand is "Brainy Betty". Doesn't that convey that she's intelligent? I am seriously missing something.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 06:55 PM
1

I'm confused. How is a woman talking on a telephone sexist? I'm not being sarcastic here, really. It's not like the logo is a big googed, confused looking bimbo type image. It's a woman talking on a telephone and smiling. And she's called Brainy Betty? It's actually the opposite of sexism, depicting an attractive woman as Brainy Betty is a positive thing for a tech company, isn't it?
/r/MensRights03/08/13 06:51 PM
2

You can't see anything in that video that could let us know what actually happened.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 11:14 AM
0

WTF?! Who does this kind of shit? You don't just go touching strangers kids unless you want an ass whooping.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 11:10 AM
7

Wow. I'm sorry you were subjected to such a harsh reaction. As a father, I always encourage my daughter to think critically - about everything. If she were to come to me, with an idea that I don't necessarily agree with, I'd still disagree with her, but I'd be proud that she's challenging her standard belief system and questioning things that she had normally taken for granted. If that was the reaction you got for questioning, I can only make assumptions about the rest of your childhood, and I h…
/r/MensRights03/08/13 11:01 AM
1

It's because he has a penis. There's not a single girl who sent a racey selfie that is sexist, they're either empowered or victims of the men they sent them to. See, penis -> sexist. No penis -> not sexist. Hope this clears things up for you.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 10:17 AM
3

I am happy to see justice brought to perpatrators of sexual abuse and rape, provided that the crimes can adequately be proved in a court of law. I think the standard for evidence should probably be higher for cases that are decades old, but I don't think that the fact that they haven't raped anyone in a long time should be a factor. IMO, this does still serve as a deterrent to other rapists. They would have the threat of prosecution hanging over them for much longer, though there are questions a…
/r/MensRights27/07/13 09:43 AM
0

Are we certain that this was actually why he was doing this and not just someone's lame attempt at a humourous title?
/r/MensRights27/07/13 09:22 AM
6

When my daughter was young I wanted to get a gym membership. I checked out GoodLife. All of the gyms with daycare facilities, in Toronto, were women only. I called them up to ask why and was told that there wasn't any demand for gyms with child care facilities that allow men. I told them that they can start their demand tally now. A year later I called back, still nothing. Also, none of the gyms at the groery stores in my city allowed men, which was also a pain. Now, about 10 years later, it loo…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 05:50 PM
1

As I understand it, and correct me if I'm wrong, ovum cells are present from birth in the ovaries. They are released at the onset of puberty, usually one per month, until there are none left. With men, sperm cells are continually produced. As a man ages, the "quality" of the sperm cells degrade and genetic problems can arise. As women age, other problems can arise during pregnancy.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 08:56 PM
1

I absolutely, 100% agree!
/r/MensRights26/06/13 09:54 PM
1

I have to disagree with you. We can learn from historical mistakes. If we structure the MRM in such a way that the eventual end solution is not a special men's issues government agency, but a splitting of the salient issues to be adressed for actual gender equality, we could do away with organizations like NOW, SOW, etc. The first step, for us, would be to break down the areas where there is discrimination and start effecting change in each of them. This approach may be especially suited to the …
/r/MensRights26/06/13 08:12 PM
1

I agreee with this to a certain extent. What I'd like to see eventually is rather than splitting by gender, splitting by other issues. Family courts, workplace issues, medical funding. These are all positive things that people can get behind...after the most pressing men's issues have been addressed. That's one way the end game could take. Rather than men vs women, things would have to be structured in areas that affect both genders, that affect human rights. That's a non tribal direction that w…
/r/MensRights26/06/13 08:02 PM
2

Thanks. Maybe I'm wrong, maybe not. This has been rattling around in my head for a while. So far I've seen little forward movement in the real world with respect to men's issues. We need a path, and the ability to sway public opinion in order to make progress, at least that's the way I see it. Until we go beyond the on information gathering/disseminating/venting phase of this movement, it will remain stagnent. There have been some, disjointed efforts, but there is a need to get organized.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 07:57 PM
1

Ah, i know your pain. I was an independent contractor for about 10 years. Fun working without a net, isn't it? Sometimes I miss it.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 05:15 PM
4

Canadian here, you should have been able to. A friend of mine just recently had several monthes off after the birth of his daugher.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 04:58 PM
2

I agree that there are ideas and theories in Feminism that need to be fought against. I'm saying that we need to fight against bad science, twisted statistics that obfuscate the truth, cultural and social acceptability of marginalizing men's value as human beings. I tihink we need to ensure that we do this by casting light where it is needed and ensuring that our voices are heard. Will we have to go toe to toe with some poeple, of course. What I am saying is that we need to go about getting our …
/r/MensRights26/06/13 04:10 PM
9

I think you need to re-read my post. I am absolutely not condoning institutionalized degradation of men's rights. In the context of the OK Cupid post, and the post I was responding to, I was addressing the issue of tribalism, how it can be harmful and putting it in context of relationships. If we refuse to share ideas with feminists, how can we undo the damage done by the indoctrination, distortion of facts, and propagation of tribal based conflicts (the tribe, in this case of gender). My respon…
/r/MensRights26/06/13 12:10 PM
5

I wouldn't put too much stock in it, it seems to be a fashion thing. A few decades ago hairy chests were fashionable. Now, not so much, but beards are becoming fashionable. Ignore the media noise and look however you want to look. There are definitely some women who find chest hair attactive and others who don't. There are women who find beards attactive and others who don't. At the end of the day, it's your body, do with it whatever pleases you.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 10:34 AM
1

I have never married and I do have a daughter. I can understand the difficulties with childcare, but all I was saying was that it was great for me. I commute 150 km per day, it would free up about 2-3 hours a week for me and save me approximately $90 per month in fuel costs. I can understand how it can make child care more difficult though.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 10:29 AM
1

The title of this post alone is proof that men do need a "male safe" place to turn for support. Unfortunately, I can't think of anything that can help your situation. You trusted your ex to stick to an agreement and hold up her end of the bargain and she didn't. You have also provided her with the benefit of an extra $2000 a month of disposable income that can easiy go toward legal fees to work against you. If nothing else, we can add to the collective knowledge being massed here, learn and help…
/r/MensRights26/06/13 09:21 AM
0

I'm 40 and work in a STEM field and can also say that this is absolutely true in my profession.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 09:10 AM
3

When I was working a contract I worked four, ten hour shifts and absolutely loved it. Mind you I had just come off a contract where I was working six ten hour shifts.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 09:06 AM
2

I lol'd. There is a certain nugget of truth in that.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 09:04 AM
13

This phenomena is a form of tribalism and can be very limiting. If you explicitly limit your interactions to people with similar or identical viewpoints as yourself you lose out on expansion of your own ideas. This is very prevlant in American politics right now and is reflected in the media. Just because you don't agree with all of someone's perspectives, or even most of them, doesn't mean that they have nothing to offer. That being said, for a relationship, a certain level of common ideology i…
/r/MensRights26/06/13 08:56 AM
3

I think most reasonable people would agree that getting tattoos on children is not acceptable but ear piercing probably is. The fact is, that both of these procedures are reversible, although it is much more difficult with tattoos. Circumcision is not a truely reversable procedure. There are some steps that can be taken to attempt to restore a circumsicion, but they are much more difficult than tattoo removal. As this is the case, it seems that making a decision such as an elective surgical proc…
/r/MensRights23/06/13 12:10 PM
1

If feminism is about addressing all aspects of equality then please provide me with a link showing a a feminist initiative to rectify the problems of male suicide rates being 4x those for women. Maybe also include feminist initiatives addressing the fact that 95% of workplace deaths happen to males and feminist based solutions to the dropping rates of boys graduating high schools and entering post secondary education. How about feminist groups encouraging men to become nurses and teachers?
/r/MensRights22/06/13 01:25 AM
7

How about we go the other way? I need Feminism because I still have some access to my children. I need Feminism because my divorce left me with A few scraps of my former assets. I need Feminism because I tried to listen to other people's ideas at my local university I need Feminism because issues that affect men need never be addressed.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 08:11 PM
2

That's exactly the point I made above.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 05:58 AM
3

I think any loving father would take exception to this statement. My daughter is absolutely MY daughter. They were an intact family when he was imprisoned, there's no reason to believe that he didn't want to be a father.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 12:27 AM
5

I don't necessarily agree with that. The state dragged his family through hell too. They separated a wife from her husband and a child from it's father. There is real damage associated with the reduction of support that a husband and father can provide, this is especially true for the child that had to grow up without his father present.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 12:23 AM
7

If you check the source file, you'll find how they came to that amount: http://www.texastribune.org/2013/06/16/exoneree-faces-his-ex-wife-compensation-lawsuit/ "An expert testified in court that Tucker’s half of the earnings Phillips could have made during the time they were married was about $114,000. The court also granted Tucker legal fees, bringing the total award to about $153,000" Perhaps child support may have been necessary as well, but when they divorced his income was zero. The compens…
/r/MensRights19/06/13 10:38 PM
1

I would, if you have a link that would be awesome. My point was that the author should have read it, they should have done some actual research, before publishing this slanted nonsense.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 11:59 AM
22

What I really like about this article is how they applied absolutely no scientific analysis to the problem. Men are more susceptable to disease. Why? Meh, it must be because they are men. That's a good enough explanation. Let's not bother to wonder if there are environmental factors that are affecting their immune systems. Lets not wonder if there is some genetic cause to explain this. Naw, men must just be weaker. If we say that then nobody has to give a crap, because it's just men. 95% of work…
/r/MensRights17/06/13 07:12 PM
2

It really depends on the age of the girl she was dating. A two year age difference is one thing, a 6 year age difference is another. Personally, I dated an 18 year old girl when I was 14 and dpn't feel that it was a damaging relationship. Kids at this age date eachother. They shouldn't be prosecuted for doing so, be they male or female.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 11:23 PM
1

There are reasons other than religion why gender segregated classes are beneficial. What people want to believe is their business. When public areas have to restrict access to people, because of religous beliefs, then your religion is having an impact on me.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 05:50 PM
0

I do, it's ridiculous. If someone wants to have imaginary friends, that's fine. But if you're at a public pool, your religion should never impact my ability to enjoy part of my daughter's activities.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 10:53 AM
0

Screaming and swearing is a great way to get a message across. I'm an athiest, I don't agree with this guy, but he is entitled to his opinions in a free country. Perhaps if she put forward a better arguement, more people would give a crap about what she has to say.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 11:34 PM
1

As a vegetarian, all I can say is W...T...F! Reasons why MRA's should be vegetarians: vegetables are yummy. It'd piss off completely mental feminists
/r/MensRights23/03/13 09:34 PM
1

I think that having a certain amount of gender segregation at younger ages. Not complete segregation, but partial. Boys and girls learn differently but still need to learn to interact with each other.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 01:52 PM
1

Stats Can, check out their statistics for domestic violence rates by gender and then check out government funding for women's shelters and men's shelter.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 05:31 PM
5

First off, the thing to Remember is that the Ryerson Student's Union does not make Ryerson University's policies, it has to follow them. This is from the Ryerson University's Discrimination and Harassment Prevention Policy: Ryerson University is committed to fostering a collegial study and work milieu that is free of discrimination and harassment and one in which all individuals are treated with respect and dignity. Every member of the Ryerson University Community has a right to equal treatment …
/r/MensRights08/03/13 11:14 AM
1

Why men still get married is completely beyond me, it's such a bad deal. Almost all of my friends are married now, most of them are relegated to their "man caves" in the basement or garage. Fortunately most of them fall into the statistically less likely to divorce category, but if they do, their story will be all too familiar.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 10:57 AM
1

I'm not certain that this is true, in the early days of feminism they addressed some very real issues like those concerning women's reproductive choices and sexuality, and the right to pursue a career without discrimination. The problem is that when you start throwing money to a group to resolve certain issues, and they get resolved, those groups need to find reasons to continue to get funding or they will cease to exist. A great example of this is the domestic violence industry. By asserting th…
/r/MensRights06/03/13 12:43 PM
4

So, I don't understand. Is she sad that she can't be angry at a man for banning telecommuting or is she angry because she would expect a woman would be more understanding? I don't know why she thinks that a man making that decision would give the story a different tone. Is it that a man building a nursery next door and then giving the finger to telecommuters is worse? I'm lost here.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 10:09 PM
4

Not in most jurisdictions. There are even cases of women getting child support from multiple fathers for the same child because of that. EDIT some examples: http://www.mgtowforums.com/forums/deadbeat-dads-fathers-rights/8054-legal-two-men-ordered-pay-support-same-child.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1039875/Boy-fathers-judge-rules-landmark-ruling.html
/r/MensRights03/03/13 09:03 PM
0

Must be true then. Consent by gender someone mentioned above. I think we need to start using this phrase more often.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 08:31 PM
6

Aside from the salient points made already, the article clearly states that, at the time he was just a skinny 150 lb kid and that she weighed more than him.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 08:30 PM
4

If they move in together, he can be deemed to be acting as their father and then, if/when the relationship ends, he is on the hook for child support for two more kids.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 08:27 PM
2

Mant jurisdictions have "safe harbour" laws. This means a child can be dropped off, usually in the first few weeks, with no legal repercussions.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 08:22 PM
1

Don't get married but keep dating her.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 05:30 PM
1

Agreed. Also, it would be difficult to be married to a complete psychopath with there being any "marital problems"
/r/MensRights25/02/13 01:14 AM
-1

Right under the title the article it mentioned that the couple was having marital problems but makes no mention of what they were. Then again, it is the Daily Mail. Not the best news source around.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 01:18 PM
2

Is that real? Seriously?
/r/MensRights22/02/13 07:39 AM
2

As a canadian, I have no problem with this. What I would like to see are more birth control options for men. Both men and women should have control over the decision to become a parent. In the long run, I believe that our society will be better off if people can plan the arrival of their children when/ if they are ready for them.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 01:07 AM
2

As an outsider, it looks like the US has taken the war against science and successfully expanded it to the war against engineering. Seriously, when I was in high school, my shitty artwork would have landed me in a mental institution. Today I'm an engineer. I commute to work, mow my lawn, shovel my driveway and do all sorts of other shocking things. If only someone had nipped my mental instability in the bud, I could be unemployed in a respectable field.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 05:08 AM
2

I think you may be interpreting that law in a way that Swedes would not. Here is an analysis: http://erlinghellenas.wordpress.com/2010/09/01/the-swedish-rape-law/
/r/MensRights17/02/13 10:56 PM
1

I'm not American. (not that there's anything wrong with that /Seinfeld) The law you're quoting is already assuming rapists are men through the use of the pronoun "he" The legal definition of rape in Sweden is: "Forced vaginal intercourse or a comparable sexual act, which is carried out by assault or threat of violence. " (Source: BBC. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19333439 If anyone has a link to a better source than the BBC, I'd be appreciate it)
/r/MensRights17/02/13 10:33 PM
2

I noticed this right away. It's apalling that when women statuatorily rape boys it's mischievous but when men statuatorily rape girls, is statuatory rape.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:37 PM
1

In the case of Dave Foley, if he comes back into Canada, he will be arrested and imprisoned.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:28 PM
2

He'll get over it a lot sooner than getting over decades of child support.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:51 PM
1

Many jusridictions will have imputed income as an option. A great example of this is Dave Foley, a television star who cannot return to Canada because the courts refuse to modify his child support order. Currently he is ordered to pay 400% of his annual income. Yes, you read that right. He is expected to pay 4 times what he actually makes.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:49 PM
5

Force, no. Appealing to her emotions and desires is a different thing, and exactly what she did to the OP.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:41 PM
1

In North America, this is not the case. Child support is, more often than not, mommy support.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:37 PM
1

Think back about 6 weeks. Look at calendar and try to remember your sexual activity from that week. How about her activies for that week? It is possible that it may not be yours, but the only way to be sure is a paternity test.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:35 PM
1

Not necessarily. It really depends on what the child support guidelines are like in his state. Child support should not be mommy support and financial responsibility should be shared by both parents. Many jurisdictions have unrealistic expectations regarding how much child support should be paid.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:31 PM
1

No. It won't. Statuatory rape victims are forced to pay child support to their convicted rapists.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:28 PM
3

News flash, she doesn't care about your life, she cares about hers. Maybe she envisions a life with you because you're a great catch, but if she really cared about your life she wouldn't have kept the fact that she stopped taking birth control from you.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:21 PM
10

This won't make any difference. Family courts are in place to protect the rights of the child and are biased to believe that this means keeping that child with the mother. They claim that child support is for the child not the mother. Her bad deeds will mean absolutely nothing in family court.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:19 PM
0

Keeping something like discontinuing birth control without telling him says a lot about her character. These values are what will be passed on the the child if the father has no influence on them.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:14 PM
7

Get a lawyer. Think about trying to 50/50 custody. The long and short of it is that you're going to be screwed for child support for at least 18 years, probably more. Depending on the laws where you live it could be much longer. Here, in Ontario, Canada, if your child, as an adult, decides to continue studies you could be on the hook until their late twenties or even their thirties. Things to think about: Getting a paternity test. Very important. If it's not yours you need to know this sooner ra…
/r/MensRights17/02/13 02:05 PM
146

Sounds like a woman defining what a man and a boy are. Strange, I don't think that women would appreciate men defining what a woman should be.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 09:02 PM
7

I also love how she told him emphatically that keeping his father's house to rent and awesome garage full of cars wasn't an option. They're not even married yet and she's already making his financial decisions. If they got married, I wonder how much of his money he would be allowed to spend each week on stuff he likes.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 07:30 PM
2

Such an awesome story for this guy. Heartbreaking that he lost his father, but great that he realized in time that he was signed up for a lifetime of walking on eggshells instead of walking free. Ride on good man, ride on.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 07:03 PM
2

Haters gonna hate, I guess
/r/MensRights16/01/13 03:55 PM
3

Who doesn't love rightsbot?
/r/MensRights16/01/13 03:29 PM
2

Rockbox it!
/r/MensRights23/12/12 09:35 AM
1

As a dog owner myself, I am also disturbed by this. That being said, would kicking a wife in the face be an acceptable measure to stop her from hitting a dog? What is the list of acceptable situations where DV is acceptable? I'm also less than prepared to accept her account of the evening as truth, based on the already existing discrepancies in her story. She says her husband isn't violent. She says that she thought she kicked him in the leg and he thought se kicked him in the face. She agreed t…
/r/MensRights23/12/12 09:26 AM
4

Clealy he was confused about where she kicked him...with her high heels...sending his glasses flying. It's a good thing she doesn't feel like a victim of domestic violence, I wonder if her husband does...
/r/MensRights22/12/12 02:28 AM
1

This! A million times this! Get a paternity test now. she could be filing papers that will never get to him and he will only find out once he gets the court order and then it's game over, regardless of who the father is.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 02:03 AM
8

Allow me to summarize: I came home and, through a series of unfortunate events, my husband was doing something I didn't approve of, so I kicked him in the leg, although he mistakenly believes I kicked him in the face. It's okay though, because that's not domestic violence, he was doing something I didn't approve of, so kicking is clearly alright in that situation. He tried to shove me away and my face was cut by my glasses and I fell down the stairs, due to a ridiculous choice of footwear. I nee…
/r/MensRights22/12/12 01:58 AM
1

I guess there are no feminists in lifeboats
/r/MensRights11/12/12 11:10 PM
1

I have to agree. While he may not have been having sex for the right reason, I don't think this is rape as much as it is being emotionally abusive.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 04:36 PM
1

You can only do this if your child is less than 3 days old. The wording of this implies that any parent can do this, but I wonder how many men have sole access to a three day old newborn http://safehavenlaws.uslegal.com/colorado-safe-haven-laws/
/r/MensRights09/11/12 01:49 PM
15

Unless you are a woman: http://www.canadiancrc.com/child_abandonment.aspx
/r/MensRights05/10/12 10:39 AM
5

But you can get palimony, even if you're just in a sexual relationship http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palimony
/r/MensRights25/09/12 01:35 PM
12

"It also reduces the chances that men will spread HPV to their wives and girlfriends, protecting them from getting cervical cancer." Let's perform a surgical, genital amputation, without anesthetic, on baby boys, in order to protect their future wives/girlfriends. Imagine this arguement if it were gender reversed. How well do you think that would go over?
/r/MensRights02/09/12 10:35 PM
5

Hey does anyone remember how everyone assumed that those Duke Lacrosse boys were guilty, and how 80 some odd professors signed a petition supporting this woman, and how women's rights groups stood in front of the Lacrosse players' house and accused them of rape because of this woman? Good times.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 01:35 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter