~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| -4 | Are men 'Going Galt' ?100,000,000 died at war, they're probably practically mostly male. That's atrocious! Really. I don't think the women of the time asked them to do that, or had any political power to make it happen, but war is terrible. I wish it didn't happen, and I spend a ridiculous amount of time and effort making sure I don't have anything to do with it. It doesn't suit me better to say that women are worse off, and I won't. I haven't even played my victim card. I'm not a man or a woman, which pretty much me… | /r/MensRights | 21/09/12 04:03 AM |
| -3 | Are men 'Going Galt' ?300,000,000 fewer women than there should be No, I'm not including the tens of millions of men who died in wars. I do believe that equality will give people less reason to fight, but that may be wilful naïveté. I don't think it's good that people die in wars, if that's why you raised the issue. The 300,000,000 estimate is a regularly cited figure from Nobel Prize winner Amartya Sen, I assumed that it wasn't very obscure. You should read his stuff, he's exceptionally good on social welfare things… | /r/MensRights | 21/09/12 02:57 AM |
| -7 | Are men 'Going Galt' ?And here's an example of how men (like yourself) have been responsible for the deaths of countless innocent people: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler ...that's absolutely ridiculous. I would have nothing to gain from female supremacy, I don't have that sort of submission fantasy, and I'm not female. | /r/MensRights | 21/09/12 02:36 AM |
| -6 | Are men 'Going Galt' ?I think the misunderstanding here is that I never said that men aren't also fucked over by patriarchy/kyriarchy. I mentioned child support and paternity specifically to acknowledge that men do suffer oppression. Does that clarify things for you? | /r/MensRights | 21/09/12 02:24 AM |
| -9 | Are men 'Going Galt' ?I think I'll have to give in; the sum of my experience is no match for your skills of persuasion. I'll never call myself a feminist again. | /r/MensRights | 21/09/12 02:08 AM |
| -7 | Are men 'Going Galt' ?I think I am an egalitarian. I do believe there is an imbalance of power amongst genders, then I go look for some facts and I find that men hold 82% of government seats around the world, and there's a compelling case to say there are 300,000,000 fewer women than there should be. Before we even get to stuff like objecification, child support, abortion, paternity leave etc, there's a really huge problem, and non-males seem to have the raw end of the stick. If it means anything in this context, I'm… | /r/MensRights | 21/09/12 01:46 AM |
| -7 | Are men 'Going Galt' ?Okay, I'm sorry you feel that way. Is there something else I can do for you? | /r/MensRights | 21/09/12 01:24 AM |
| -5 | Are men 'Going Galt' ?I believe in peace because I'm a muslim. Declaring I believe in peace and that I'm a muslim doesn't mean that I support or excuse all the things that are done in the name of Islam. I think it's very simple, feminism means that nobody should be treated differently because of their gender or lack thereof. Helen Smith believes that, calls herself a feminist, and is on a feminist website. If some people have a different view to me... meh | /r/MensRights | 21/09/12 12:39 AM |
| -10 | Are men 'Going Galt' ?I am a feminist because I believe in gender equality. If Men's Rights is about gender equality then I admire you all for coming on board with gender issues, and if you'd prefer not to be called feminists I understand that. However, if I were to say that I believe in peace because I am a muslim, it is not giving an excuse to so-called muslim terrorists, nor would I be condemning those who bring those people to justice. I take feminism to be pro-people, and anti-patriarchy. It's been established i… | /r/MensRights | 21/09/12 12:06 AM |
| -1 | Are men 'Going Galt' ?I have many friends who are quite dedicated to doing what they can to work against gender inequality, they call themselves feminists. I'm not sure what cross-posting on a lowest-common-denominator website would prove, but you're more than welcome to. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/12 11:07 PM |
| -1 | Are men 'Going Galt' ?As a feminist, I don't think I know any feminists who would disagree with what Helen Smith says. feminist ideology in our modern context... What precludes Helen Smith's ideas from being feminist ideology in a modern context? It says right atop the page that she's a modern feminist. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/12 08:17 PM |
| -8 | Women need men like fish need a bicycle? Ok, then...The first two seem to deal with an observation that MR discusses a lot, and seem sort of interesting sociological studies. They don't appear to be encouraging anything negative, just making an observation. They fit comfortably into a view of feminists caring about everyone regardless of gender, or lack thereof. As for Dan Abrams' book, that looks silly. When I said male feminists I was thinking more along the lines of Michel Foucault. I'm not going to argue that there are no feminists who hate m… | /r/MensRights | 20/09/12 08:11 PM |
| -13 | Women need men like fish need a bicycle? Ok, then...How old are they, out of interest? Man-hating has been out of fashion amongst feminists, and not part of any respectable discourse, since the seventies (forty years ago). I wasn't around for that, but of course I know what they said. I've never met a feminist who had anything nice to say about Greer, Bindel, etc. Feminism is about gender equality for all; I think the "man-hating lesbian" thing is a bit of a straw man at this point. Even as a man-hating lesbian I'm pretty glad about this. There a… | /r/MensRights | 20/09/12 07:30 PM |
| 5 | Women need men like fish need a bicycle? Ok, then...Chortle. ALL my feminist friends write those books; it gets so grating, I just hate it when they do that. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/12 04:51 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter