TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

danmurphey Archive

View 8 posts and 158 comments by danmurphey on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Cheers nicemod!
/r/MensRights30/08/14 10:09 PM
1

How is it flip-flopping? Your reading comprehension is way out of whack. My belief has been the same throughout. Maybe I forgot to put the quotation marks around 'defending herself'. You can't really say you're defending yourself if you're making the situation 10x worse. Stop hiding behind semantics, it is pathetic; whether you agree or not my statements have been clear and consistent. You seem to be unable to understand anything aside from what you believe. I completely understand what you beli…
/r/MensRights30/08/14 09:53 PM
1

How on earth can you say she defended herself from a sexual assault? Do you really think getting knocked out is defending yourself from sexual assault? I suppose he did stop after that. Telling the guy to stop didn't defend her, pushing the guy didn't defend her. It just made things a heap worse. If you think taking note of the stupid things people do to open themselves to violent crime is victim blaming, then you are fucking stupid. "Don't leave valuables on display in your car" - "Victim blame…
/r/MensRights30/08/14 06:19 PM
1

The lack of capability for nuanced thought on the whole victim blaming thing is quite interesting to hear though.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 08:00 AM
1

What do you mean 'fault'? You do realize that bad things happen to good people? All sorts of shit could happen to you without you being in the slightest bit to blame? How do you get by with such a simplistic monochrome view of the world? Even with hindsight, I don't go around provoking people who have demonstrated themselves to be utter pricks.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 07:52 AM
-2

I don't think it would have been possible to avoid the sexual assault. I think the getting punched could easily have been avoided.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 09:51 PM
-1

"Avoid confrontation" can mean avoiding other people's confrontations.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 09:08 PM
-1

Who said she confronted him? All I'm thinking is that standing your ground when you're beat is a dumb move. Pushing back achieved absolutely nothing.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 07:18 PM
0

Just interested about other guys experience of street violence. Whether I'd be alone in the 'avoid confrontation with street-crazies at all costs' approach.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 05:27 PM
0

You are right, and I certainly didn't mean to. I am entirely non-violent and I'd love to be able to stamp out violent crime. I just don't believe it to be possible. I'd love to be protected from getting the shit kicked out of me for no reason. But how exactly do we go about it? We shouldn't have to deal with it, but we do have to deal with it and have learned to deal with it.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 04:59 PM
-4

So, where is the protection for men against street violence? Basically, we have to deal with it. I know loads of guys who have had the shit kicked out of them simply for being in the wrong place at the wrong time. There is no outrage over that. You have to know how to avoid bad situations. The difference in danger-perception between the sexes is a gender issue. Or at least of interest. The guys who got stabbed at Carnival may have been defending themselves. But I guess we'll know very little bey…
/r/MensRights29/08/14 04:27 PM
5

And yet you feel most women prefer it. How odd. If you have grown up in America or any other fucked-up culture that promotes the unnatural mutilation of penises and have no problem with it. Then yes, you have been socially conditioned. Sorry. You didn't grow up thinking FGM was acceptable. You didn't grow up thinking removing eyelids/earlobes/little fingers was acceptable. You haven't just naturally decided that mutilated penises look better than unmutilated penises. That would be some mad-shit.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 03:24 PM
13

Right on. I don't like it when a woman's parents didn't have the foresight to trim their daughter's labia as a baby for my own sexual pleasure. Labia make me feel sick. Gross. Seriously, a woman's opinion on how she likes her dicks mutilated shouldn't come into it. When I see American women saying that they think foreskins are 'gross', I instantly want to tell them how disgusting their vaginas are and have at them with a pair of scissors. You think a mutilated penis looks better because you have…
/r/MensRights29/08/14 03:08 PM
10

Thanks for coming. Keep up the unpopular work.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 02:48 PM
-1

Oh yeah, I wasn't even going to comment on how to deal with gropings. I've been groped a few times in clubs by girls. Tend to just ignore them and move. But I have no idea what it's like for women and whether men who grope tend to be more persistent than women who grope. I'd probably just have moved, if I'd been followed, stand by a police-person. It's just common-fucking-sense.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 01:55 PM
-2

This guy gets it. I even forgot that just yesterday I was on a bus in London and had a big bus-crazy sit down behind me and start muttering about what a 'cunt' I am under his breath (how did he know?!), looking for a reaction. Automatically knew to subtly turn sideways keep one eye on him, pretend I was deaf and do absolutely nothing to provoke him. It happens all the time without me even thinking about it anymore. This girl would probably have reacted thinking she had some force-field around he…
/r/MensRights29/08/14 01:46 PM
14

With lots of kids growing up in single-parent homes and being denied access to their fathers, I kinda understand the schools wish not to exclude the kids who don't know their dads. I'd be fine with them adding on "important men" onto father's day (in lieu of fixing father's rights) to include men who are stepping in, but to wipe out fathers completely is stupid and wrongheaded. Glad you managed to get them to change their minds.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 09:23 AM
4

I'm not really getting the distinction between that matriarchal society and traditional family values. Basically the method of hunting and gathering have changed. Back then, men provided, women nurtured. That's matriarchy. Twentieth century, women nurtured, men provided. That's patriarchy. I feel stupid. Somebody explain what the chuff they are on about please.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 11:45 PM
2

I cannot believe you are getting so shat up about this. It's a deliberately exaggerated humourous term for children. Seriously, you need to grow up and be less precious.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 07:01 PM
2

Awwwww, biddums doesn't like some words. Grow up, love.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 06:29 PM
2

I was commending fathers on how they care for their kids, even if they are little shits. You are clearly over-sensitive. EDIT: And I find the term jackass offensive, how dare you sir. Stop oppressing me!
/r/MensRights24/08/14 06:22 PM
1

I'm fairly confident my kids would have a sense of humour.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 06:07 PM
2

I'd love you to have contact with them too. I don't have to like children to support your right to clog the earth up with them and see them. What has my opinion on children got to do with parental rights? I support equal custody for children. I also don't particularly care for children. It's not something to cry about, a lot of people don't particularly care about children. And find them irritating. I've literally seen new-mothers respond with better humour to exaggerated baby-hate. Learn to tak…
/r/MensRights24/08/14 06:02 PM
1

know your meme
/r/MensRights24/08/14 04:08 PM
2

For describing babies as sexcrement? It's a joke term for bratty kids. You must be a riot at parties.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 04:05 PM
7

Accuracy can be terrible. (Don't worry, I have no intention of creating one myself.)
/r/MensRights23/08/14 04:23 PM
3

Thing is, it doesn't work all that well. Women who go into Engineering for the bursary as opposed to a vocational desire soon realize doing something they're not interested in isn't worth the bonus £20000 (or whatever) and either drop off the course or do poorly after it. If I went into primary school teaching instead of secondary teaching, I'd probably not finish the course or change career after a few years. Even if it was an extra £5000 a year for my entire career, I would rather do something…
/r/MensRights23/08/14 02:33 PM
6

I'm planning on starting my teacher training next year. I'm 27 and I've done work experience in both Primary and Secondary schools. I feel like I should go into Primary teaching because I would do a lot of good as a positive male role model. The problem is, I have absolutely no interest in it. There is so much more caring involved, and I don't want to care for children, I want to teach teenagers on how to be awesome and engaged. And primary school teaching is really hard, and non-stop, and you r…
/r/MensRights23/08/14 02:28 PM
36

What a guy. When I think of all the shit the men in my family have done to make their kids/wife happy, and what all my mates who are dads do for their bratty little sexcrement; it's really sad that people seem so intent on painting negative images of fatherhood. It has to be pretty even in the good mum/good dad ratio.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 02:05 PM
2

Even I'd say the guy on 11th Aug in the white vest is micro-aggressing. He's actually doing the splits. I'm heading down to London next week, I'll make sure to take some creepy photos to submit for them.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 01:46 PM
4

Hopefully he'll get out of it before too long. This isn't just feminism though. This is feminism mixed with a fucked up idea of how relationships are supposed to work, what with the trash talking about friends and controlling behaviour. Where radical feminism meets Borderline Personality Disorder, there be misery. Might be a month, might be longer. All you can do is tell him that he shouldn't be with somebody who isolates him away from friends (and probably family) and pick up where you left off…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 04:41 PM
5

Hmm, I feel a strong urge to spend the day mocking up naked pictures of disney princesses and going into detailed descriptions of their vaginas.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 11:15 AM
1

I agree that nothing should be censored. If it was a joke that revealed something of the nature of MGM then all for it. But George Carlin she ain't. She's not laughing at the idiocy of MGM, she's just laughing at foreskins. Makes me very sad to see a roomful of people lapping it up. If it was FGM you would be able to hear a pin drop (rightly so).
/r/MensRights21/08/14 05:08 AM
1

Very nice. And I'm sorry. I just can't understand how it is not possible to get very upset about circumcision. I don't understand how it can be seen as anything other than abuse.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 11:13 PM
1

Who finds jokes about circumcision funny. Have you got any good ones about dads who haven't seen their kids this year or homeless people?
/r/MensRights20/08/14 10:00 PM
1

Good for you! Why are you on a Men's Rights board though?
/r/MensRights20/08/14 04:57 PM
1

The "health and cleanliness" really is utter nonsense. You just clean it as you would a cut penis, only you pull the foreskin back. You don't even have to think about it, 70% of the world's male population get by fine. It is only in America (where doctors make a shit-tonne of money out of circumcision) that there is widespread propaganda that foreskins are dirty. It would be like saying you have trouble cleaning inside a cooking pot because the lid gets in the way. It just moves to the side like…
/r/MensRights20/08/14 01:05 AM
3

I'm gonna guess you are somewhere in Europe. Whilst it is more uncommon, there are still thousands of boys who have their penises mutilated because of religious reasons every year. America is very fucked up when it comes to MGM, but we're not completely isolated from the problem. A shift away from thinking it is something to joke about is an important step. Then perhaps we can protect penises against zealots in Europe like we protect vaginas.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 02:08 PM
1

"Yeah, but you can prove anything with facts"
/r/MensRights19/08/14 01:56 PM
3

Because both you and this woman are contributing to a culture where the mutilation of babies has been normalized. The fact that you think a normal (not uncircumcised, you aren't an unamputated male when you have both arms and legs) penis looks 'weird' is really sad to hear. MGM is a barbaric and damaging act routinely carried out against babies, to contribute to the culture that supports the act is anti-men.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 11:42 AM
2

Maybe not rage. But it shows the depth of the problem when almost the entire room is laughing about something so awful. And it is completely arbitrary, if American culture insisted that all babies had to have their little fingers amputated at birth, and then somebody got on stage and shamed people with five fingers as "gross"; that would seem pretty odd.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 11:37 AM
7

http://www.cc.com/video-clips/r16zsr/comedy-central-presents-european-boyfriend Here's another one. I just can't understand how this is in any way acceptable. The good thing is, if anybody ever questions the need for an MRM, you can now just link them to a video of 500 people laughing about mutilated penises.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 02:27 AM
2

I agree, but I really wish they hadn't called it "Chickens".
/r/MensRights19/08/14 01:26 AM
3

notallliberals
/r/MensRights14/08/14 11:49 AM
2

Do any MRAs support quotas for men?
/r/MensRights14/08/14 11:47 AM
4

Seriously, are we all left-wing here? I thought I was in a party on one. Maybe we could add renationalisation of the trains to the MRA agenda.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 04:58 PM
6

It is really odd how the left has been hijacked. I'm as socialist as they come, but I have always thought that this was about removing discrimination, and putting the correct framework in place to make sure that people have an equal opportunity to succeed regardless of their condition of birth. Not just waiting until people are of working age, and then helping out the least able to redress the formative years. Just do things sensibly and properly, rather than trying for a quick fix.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 04:35 PM
4

I support bringing underrepresented women and minorities into STEM fields and promoting equality in education. I want my daughter to feel as comfortable with tech as I do. I never expected the politics of equality that I believe in to result in me ending up being discriminated against. What an idiot. Who would have possibly in their wildest dreams imagined that the 'band-aid over a gun-shot wound' approach of positive discrimination would wind up with people who have worked hard to achieve being…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 04:22 PM
1

^ ^ ^ try this pretty much word for word ^ ^ ^
/r/MensRights13/08/14 11:56 AM
5

There aren't many spaces where guys can talk about things that are worrying them in their personal lives without being told just to 'man up' or 'deal with it.' Why would you have a problem with one of the community bringing their concerns here to get advice? What's the point of supporting Men's Rights if you're not going to bother helping individual men who are finding themselves in a spot?
/r/MensRights13/08/14 11:54 AM
0

There probably isn't any need to go to HR. You could quite easily call her out on it, which would make you look less weird and way more assertive. I remember at a party when I was 18 I overheard a girl describing me as a 'kiss-ass' (I was such an obnoxious twat, I can only guess she caught me clumsily trying to flirt with someone). A quick "we've never even spoken to each other in the two years we've been at college together, go fuck yourself" allayed her suspicion that I was, in fact, a kiss-as…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 11:50 AM
1

Indeed, "patriarchy theory is mental" is usually enough. Just thought it was an interesting perspective.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 01:23 AM
1

The fact that all her relationships were based on achieving financial security in order to pursue her own endeavours makes patriarchy theory look mental. Thought a few people here might find it interesting.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 11:21 PM
2

It really, really isn't. female to male transmission is already one of the lowest risk exposure acts (http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/policies/law/risk.html). It has a risk of 4 in 10000 from an infected source. Reduce this by 60% and so what? Reducing your risk by just over a half isn't enough. If anything it is worse because it gives you a false sense of security. It just means that you get away with risky behaviour for a bit longer. If you can reach someone with a knife, you can reach them with condom…
/r/MensRights08/08/14 10:25 AM
2

The problem with this is saying it reduces the chance of transmission by 60% like that actually means something. 60% sounds like a lot, but your chances of catching HIV on a random hookup would be about 0.5% in North America/Europe. No idea about Africa, but let's but a random guess out at 5%. So in US your chances reduce to 0.2%, in Africa 2%. That's great and all, but you could just leave people with a fully formed penis and encourage the use of condoms. They're great, cheap, and are proven th…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 11:28 PM
1

Nope, but the consequences of sex are greater for women than men. That's why they are more sexually selective. Historically, getting pregnant was a pretty dangerous thing to do, which is why chastity was such an important thing. I'm in no way saying that this is right, but what is 'right'? It is an understandable double standard, and potentially unchangeable.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 09:57 PM
1

Well since you said "believe me,".,..
/r/MensRights07/08/14 04:06 PM
1

I think testosterone and oestrogen probably do have different effects. Even if it is not biological though we have different taught behaviours, where teenage girls are a lot more fearful of the consequences of banging. We also work on a system of female-choice intersexual selection which slants this. Which, whilst it can suck for us, is older than civilization and probably unchangeable. If people feel that a girl isn't old enough to make an educated choice, then it is going to seem more like she…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 09:58 AM
2

Age differences in teenagers probably is a bit more complicated than just flipping the genders due to where boys and girls are at development wise at those ages. I do seem to remember thinking about sex a lot when I was 16. Rightly or wrongly, there is the assumption that 16yo boys get into relationships with their hormones insisting that they bone someone, anyone, so long as it is nowish. So that does seem to make any relationship at that age appear to be sexually motivated. There were a couple…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 01:43 AM
3

Poor woman, led astray by a child. Minding her own business, eating and inserting cucumbers into herself, and then they try to prosecute her for it! The world we live in. It should be an easy decision for the jury seeing as we all know that there's no such thing as a female paedophile. Seriously though, I hope she gets as long as any guy who's main defence was that "she clearly fucking wanted it, Your Honour. AmIright! (brohighfive)." Cunt.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 01:29 AM
2

Hmm, lot of trouble reading here apparently, definitely says 4 years and 11 months.
/r/PussyPass06/08/14 08:02 AM
1

Sarah Champion MP says that she is also concerned and is taking it up with Greg Dyke and will report back what he says. Which, for the sake of a 5 minute email, not the worst result imaginable. Nice paper too, bit concerned how much government money must be going on those extra gsm.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 10:16 PM
2

Oh my days this looks exciting. I doubt it will be too long before a bigger budget documentary comes along as well with proper distribution.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 09:58 PM
3

FINGERS IN EARS This never happens never happens never happens never happens never happens never happens never happens never happens never happens never happens never happens never happens never happens never happens never happens never happens never happens
/r/MensRights29/07/14 09:47 PM
4

Or maybe he remembered to use capital letters at the start of his sentences.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 09:39 PM
6

This is on AMR. Apparently female experience and gut instinct outweighs toxicology reports AND WE ARE ALL BLOODY MISOGYNISTS FOR EVEN RAISING THE QUESTION. Although its absolutely fine for them to ignore 'male experience' and ask whether there's any evidence that circumcision kills sensation. It's just the hypocrisy I find irritating. Date rape drugs can be pretty much anything, so you do come across things you could use. You'd have to take a pretty heavy dose of any benzos to disassociate (coug…
/r/MensRights29/07/14 07:00 PM
2

OK, tell you what. You hire a human rights lawyer, get yourself over to Qatar and kick some ass. I'll write to a few people. I really don't see what your problem is tbh. I am not under the illusion that my MP is going to get the first train down to London to chain herself to the cenotaph on Whitehall and refuse to eat until something is done. But there really is no harm in bringing things to their attention. MPs have more power than individuals, they are a good place to start. I don't have a dir…
/r/MensRights29/07/14 01:35 PM
2

This isn't just a problem facing 'foreigners' though. In 8 years time many European and American countries will be sending teams to play in the stadiums that cost what has estimated to possibly be over 4000 lives. In turning a blind eye, our countries are entirely complicit in these human rights violations. So make a fuss about your country joining in and supporting it.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 12:50 PM
2

Probably. But for the sake of 5 minutes of my time I feel its worth it. Feel free to sit around being cynical and doing fuck all though.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 12:45 PM
2

Yurp. I don't know where you're from, but I've had a lot of success in writing to politicians in the past. It's what they are there for. If you get a dozen constituents writing to an MP about something, and if its something that they agree with, then there's the possibility of it being raised at a higher level. It takes 5 minutes and no paper (have you used email before, I reckon it will take off).
/r/MensRights29/07/14 11:05 AM
2

Write to your local politician and Football Association letting them know that you feel there should be a national boycott and that a team should not be sent from your country. Football should not be played on mass graves.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 10:30 AM
2

If you go to www.writetothem.com , you can just type in your Post Code and it will automatically send your message to your MP. They also get assessed on how quickly they respond through that website so better than writing directly. My letter's below, feel free to borrow from it or copy it wholesale if you're feeling lazy. Only takes five minutes to do: Dear MP Whoever, Having just read about the 1000+ deaths of migrant workers and slave-labour conditions in Qatar, is there to be any serious disc…
/r/MensRights29/07/14 10:25 AM
2

There needs to be some kind of boycott on one of these international events. Particularly a FIFA one. All it would take is for one Football Association to go "Fuck off, we're not joining in" for FIFA to stop handing tournaments to countries with the thickest brown envelopes and the worst human rights records. Petitioning the FA might be one thing to think about. EDIT: Also for British people, writing to MPs to stimulate the debate in parliament.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 09:53 AM
2

Sorry, that was sarcasm. I'd also be as smacked up as I possibly could be if I'd been as unfortunate as this lad.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 11:14 PM
2

So long as they're making a free choice I guess: "[I started] because of need, hunger. First it was for food, then money, later purely for drugs. More for drugs than money. I was seven years old when I started. I slept outside of churches, drunks would arrive to sleep there, first they sought me out and later I sought them out. In cities where there was no gay cruising (ambiente) I started it. I told them this was how you made easy money. I did not steal. I told them, “Give pleasure and charge f…
/r/MensRights27/07/14 04:42 PM
2

I can't imagine for a second that a feminist would try and censor something she doesn't agree with...
/r/MensRights27/07/14 04:26 PM
5

Sorry, I think you've got MRA reddit mixed up with the NAMbLA reddit. It's happened once or twice before. Just go to www.whatasillycuntiam.com and it'll direct you from there. (PS. Two people saying something doesn't make it fact. WTF is wrong with you?)
/r/MensRights27/07/14 04:17 PM
6

But... mothers don't abuse children............. think there must be some mistake and that's just a man in a wig trying to make women look bad.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 03:29 PM
1

Bollocks it reduces prostate cancer. I'm trusting 'Prostate Cancer UK' over The Daily Mail on this one. It does reduce the chances of penile cancer though. Problem is, more babies die from circumcision every year than men do from penile cancer. UTIs and STDs really aren't a problem. Start washing your cock properly. And use condoms. It's odd that in every country where the doctors see no financial benefit from circumcision that the practice has basically died out (aside from the religious). In A…
/r/MensRights27/07/14 03:06 PM
1

It's just an eyelid. It's only function is to protect a sensitive organ, and if we cut them off at birth, instances of eye infections and cancer will decrease for some reason I don't know why I've not done the most basic of unbiased research. You are a completely despicable cunt. Go fuck yourself. How on earth is the mass mutilation of a baby's penis not a real issue?
/r/MensRights27/07/14 02:46 PM
2

Have you looked into stretching a new one? Supposed to work quite well.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 02:37 PM
4

Yes! Scroll down for the minority of guys who give a fuck what other people do for some reason. It's a lot more perverse to be obsessing about what two dudes get up to together from time to time than actually getting down to it yourself. They obviously want to give it a go, I'd highly recommend that they do.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 09:45 AM
4

The monopod was being held upsidedown with the camera at ankle height. Which is at best unusual.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 09:27 AM
0

Only way to bring their attention to this kinda shit.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 08:39 AM
-6

(trying to get onto AMR)
/r/MensRights26/07/14 05:48 PM
-16

Bloody feminists
/r/MensRights26/07/14 04:58 PM
1

With a lot of people you can give a careful analysis of the pay gap and their response will be "yeah, but... pay gap." Feminism is just so entrenched in academia. I'm a post-grad literature student and all through UG and now I still write from a feminist perspective, because I know that it would be academic suicide not to. Which has at least made my theoretical understanding of feminism pretty good. (Sometimes you lose yourself and eventually realize 'I am talking utter shit' - comes back with a…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 08:37 AM
1

Cretin.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 10:20 PM
1

Have I missed something?
/r/MensRights25/07/14 10:18 PM
3

Always nice to have a certifiable cunt add their threp'ny bit. Also, very impressed that you have managed to maintain a positive comment karma.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 10:14 PM
1

Oh yrr, you'd definitely think there'd be a creche or something she could safely dump them at. There a surprisingly large number of just about functioning morons in the world though.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 08:42 PM
2

But with a rusty old machete against a log and a split stick as a tourniquet?
/r/MensRights25/07/14 04:43 PM
-15

It kinda sounds like she was the sole caregiver, and if this was the case for a man, then I'd assume they'd give a non-custodial sentence rather than go to the expense of housing the kids and jailing the father. I very much doubt he'd be getting any money though. There would obviously be a double standard in terms of public perception. But I don't think that that would be a good enough reason to jail this woman and put the kids in care.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 04:41 PM
28

To be fair, this seems like a fairly alright resolution. I don't really think the public or the perp would benefit from a prison sentence more than a year of parenting classes. And its good that the money is being forced into the hands of the kids, because with that dipshit mum, they're really going to need it.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 02:16 PM
15

I assumed buckiaz was going meta on that joke. But it kinda looks like no.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 02:12 PM
1

You really don't have to attribute it to him. Just copy that quote and paste it over a picture of him. That was exactly how the AA quote was presented initially, before he thought it best to remove the picture.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 12:40 PM
16

In the description: I neither support nor condemn Fucking seriously? You're sitting on the fence for this one?
/r/MensRights25/07/14 11:28 AM
2

Fuck off nonce.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 11:33 PM
6

Paradigm shifting information. Oats are all good.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 11:23 PM
55

He even had the decency to hold her arm and drop her gently. This isn't even violence. Three swings at his head and he (fairly gently) puts her on the floor. Just don't punch people. Fucking the easiest fucking thing to do in life.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 11:07 PM
3

Fortunately it went through quite easy in the UK. I just don't even understand how there was even a discussion though. If you don't support gay marriage, don't marry someone of the same gender. Is there no constitutional argument for/against it in America? Thought there was loads about equality before the law in that thing. I just always assumed that the democrats would be all over gay marriage. That would be a political legacy and Obama would be crazy not to even try. My main beef with this is …
/r/MensRights23/07/14 10:32 PM
3

I'd really think very hard about who is marking the paper before going ahead with this. I'd also probably try to make it very targeted on one or two issues and under no circumstance make it seem like you believe men to be the oppressed gender. How old are you and are you male or female. What's the essay for?
/r/MensRights23/07/14 10:09 PM
16

Aside from feeding his kids high fructose corn snacks morning, noon and night, what an awesome advert. More of this.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 09:55 PM
5

Door holding has got really weird for me. I just always thought that if you got to a door first, you open it and let the person/people your with through. The gender thing never really came into my head. Now I've noticed that perhaps 25% of the time a woman with give me a look like I just sexually propositioned a new born pig. Think I'm just going to start barging around pretending to be ignorant of everyone around me.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 01:29 PM
2

Or at least an agreement to switch to the word "patrinati" instead of "patriarchy." Just so nobody takes it seriously.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 05:35 PM
6

Maybe a slightly less 'targeted' approach to study selection then. But definitely objective facts over "1 in 4 women will be sexually assaulted whilst at College". Oh, and the pay gap. Just stop it. It doesn't seem to matter how often the facts of the 77c study is demonstrated to feminists they take the whole "yeah but... pay gap."
/r/MensRights22/07/14 05:30 PM
7

let’s start a real discussion as to why women see feminism as threatening. Let’s start questioning their belief systems and pointing out the reality of the lives of women who do not have similar privileges. Not, "Let's start a real discussion, open ourselves up to debate and think about what we're doing that people might find bat-shit insane and make our approach more egalitarian" more "let's figure out how to figure out how to convince people we're right and everyone who disagrees is just a pri…
/r/MensRights22/07/14 05:17 PM
1

That's alright, you don't have to choose a side. I haven't dismissed feminism on the grounds of its drive for equality. I've dismissed feminism on the basis of its systematic doctoring of facts, its hijacking of domestic violence in order to sustain a multi-million pound DV economy (as a male victim of DV, this was the thing that particularly got me), its ideological approach to social-sciences (start with the conclusion, get the evidence) and the fact that this is then used to form government p…
/r/MensRights22/07/14 11:28 AM
0

Well if you read back what I said carefully, you'll see that is not at all what I was saying. Instead of me explaining it over and over again, just go back and read it until you are less confused. I've presented you with the information, it is completely up to you what you want to do with it.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 10:35 AM
0

And those fucking niggers better stop complaining about me making coon jokes and saying they're all lazy shiftless criminals too. And the jews as well. Nope, I'm talking about the words you used. Just read it back and stop straw-manning. I never said you can't complain. Complain as much as you can and want. I'm saying that drawing comparisons between anti-male slurs and anti-black slurs is not very productive. Historic oppression does not effect current equality discourse, it does heavily effect…
/r/MensRights22/07/14 10:04 AM
1

Things do spiral quite quickly, and there are definitely some MRAs who just want to be equal victims (I'm having a discussion on another thread with a guy who thinks manchild is as offensive as n****r). I used to have a foot in both camps. However I can't really see society as a patriarchy, more a capitalist oligarchy, and the notion of male privilege is nonsense. And the censorship and suspicion of science is all a bit much. And just the lies about domestic violence and that they care about men…
/r/MensRights22/07/14 09:51 AM
0

Nope, really just saying that some words are worse than others. That's why it seems ridiculous why women call their oppression 'slavery' and think that they are the most oppressed group of all time. Are you honestly comparing the word 'nigger' to the word 'manchild'?
/r/MensRights22/07/14 08:51 AM
2

Not an "anti-pedo faggot." I think you might be looking for the NAMbLA reddit. SMASH THE SYSTEM! Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights22/07/14 08:40 AM
1

Nope. I never said that it is ok to abuse, belittle and disrespect men. I just said that there's a weight of history behind the words 'nigger' and 'coon', and that it would be wrong and churlish of us to try and manufacture the same amount of outrage over anti-male slurs as we get from those two words. I don't see how that's even a controversial statement to be honest.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 08:22 AM
2

There really is a weight of history around some of those words that you don't get with anti-male humour. The persecution of black people really does outweigh our 21st century problems. If we start pretending that we are oppressed to the extent of slavery and the holocaust, that's when we have started adopting ridiculous feminist rhetoric. Men had to work every hour sent and perhaps go to war. Millions of black people and jewish people were unilaterally and systematically killed. It's different.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 12:41 AM
4

"The MRM is chock full of guys who rant about how men should want to fuck teenage girls, even if said men are old enough to be the father or grandfather of the teenage girl in question. Because evolution and first sperm in, or something. Also, agency. Also, Romeo and Juliet and everybody in the Middle Ages was hooked up at 14. Also also, benevolent patriarchy." WHERE THE FUCK DO THEY GET THIS NONSENSE FROM!? Now lets all pat ourselves on the back for not raping any children today.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 11:50 PM
6

I do my best. It was just such an obviously bullshit quote, from even a cursory glance. I can't believe they say they're founded on skepticism.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 11:03 PM
8

Husbands are the primary victims when their spouse is raped.... All seems fair enough I guess.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 09:55 PM
5

I just suggested that they were a bit of a lynch mob. I got this as a response: "Is fucked up. People died from being lynched. " and "Do not call a fucking mistake a “lynch mob”. Do not compare things to lynch mobs that are not lynch mob" facepalm They're actually children. I can't believe they're trying to remove 'lynchmob' from the lexicon. I even refrained from using 'cunt' whilst I was in their space as a mark of respect and they cry about 'lynchmob'.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 08:12 PM
5

I was a proper little feminist at university. Then I just realized that I think men and women are equal and dropped all the ideology and pseudo-science stuff. It is the first time you voice doubts and get shouted at and silenced with the 'rape-denial'/'misogynist' tag that the madness of it all sinks in. There was a similar thing where a survey showed that Atheists scored higher on a bible knowledge test than church-going Christians.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 05:50 PM
21

"If any of you are wondering why I've stopped responding to my supporters and feminists, it's because I'm waiting for it to blow over." I mean seriously, what a guy. Death threats.... Not coffee in a lift... 14, not 34. And he be all like whatever, I do what I want. He's just outdone every feminist ever.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 05:23 PM
4

Mad props to the way this kid dealt with this. If it was Anita Sarkeeeesiannes she'd have made $$$ out of those threats by now. Shown how to do it by a 14 yo boy.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 05:18 PM
11

He's a fucking scientist. Makes you wonder about he Michael Shermer rape accusation. "Woop, got an email here saying fella-my-lad fiddles kids. Probably best I pop this on my blog, no need to check its true or anything." He's just leaving it up with a [he might not have said this disclaimer]. How about a [he didn't actually ever say this disclaimer].
/r/MensRights21/07/14 04:37 PM
6

I've followed it through. AA never said it. Somebody copied it from a youtube comment, added something about mra and then sent it to PZ Myers.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 04:27 PM
7

Whoever fabricated the quote clearly put that Men's Rights bit at the end to frame it as if its something MRAs are actually fighting for.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 03:45 PM
0

Still all a bit of a worry. It is all finite.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 03:43 PM
7

I've checked the book. It doesn't mention men's rights once. This... This is how we get such a twisted reputation.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 03:35 PM
4

This is the thing, I don't think feminists expect people to follow sources. It is so often that tracking statistics down to source you'll hit a "404-file not found" on the first click. Earlier I was arguing over at the AMR and her evidence for men keeping women out of blue collar jobs was from 1945, her evidence for men reserving high paying jobs was in Ugandan agriculture (?!), and her evidence for feminists working to get women into blue collar jobs was one woman trying to get more women invol…
/r/MensRights21/07/14 01:42 PM
3

The one-up-manship of ideological feminism is astounding. You literally cannot talk about male genital mutilation anywhere on the internet without a radfem piping up about FGM. They "offer space" to talk about depression and men's issues but then tell you to stfu because it is a women's led movement. The entire feminist movement operates using a language of bigotry and censorship that is just unparalleled. It's like they haven't got a copy of 1984 between them.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 01:33 PM
2

Never apologise, that was majestic.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 01:27 PM
-1

Running out isn't the problem. The problem is getting it out of the ground at the same rate that we currently are. So as soon as we've used up half the oil, production will begin to drop. It's called a Hubbert Curve. So peak oil hit in USA in the 1970s, and since then they've been extracting less and importing more. Worldwide estimates range from 20 years to 100 years. I'm in my 20s and I hope to live long enough to see what happens. Nothing can replace oil. Look around you and try to find one t…
/r/MensRights21/07/14 01:06 PM
4

I second this sentiment.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 12:04 PM
1

Think you might be waiting quite a while. I don't think they've fully grasped the nature of hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 11:50 AM
-4

I'm suggesting that this would be a much bigger story if it wasn't men being tortured and shamed.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 11:49 AM
2

Here's a documentary series from Norway: http://www.dailymotion.com/playlists/user/BrainwashingInNorway/1 So do you not have a women's minister in Holland? Or job quotas?
/r/MensRights21/07/14 11:46 AM
-1

Here's an interesting article regarding peak oil as a women's issue: http://old.relocalize.net/node/5386 Oil has been the driving factor behind everything this past 150 years. It's freed up men from a lot of manual labour, changed working environments and alleviated much of the hard work from running the home; this all helped gender equity. We didn't use to live in traditional family units for hundreds of years because of female oppression. It was all necessity. To pass on their genes, men had t…
/r/MensRights21/07/14 11:39 AM
2

Kameradschafts Polizei! (The comrad police)
/r/MensRights21/07/14 11:21 AM
0

I think the easiest way to see into the future a bit re:gender is look at what is going on in Scandinavian countries. There does generally seem to be a growing resistance to 3rd wave feminism and I suspect that they are going to have to start adapting pretty soon. It's getting to a point where they are getting asked questions from so many different people now that they're not going to be able to get away with saying "It's not my job to educate you"/"Hahaha, that doesn't even warrant a response, …
/r/MensRights21/07/14 10:59 AM
-1

One of the Jewish guards at concentration camps who policed the Jews OR a male feminist / mangina.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 10:08 AM
-5

Ptschhh, come back to me when women are getting tortured and shamed over their sexuality. They are the important ones clearly. (I do like the picture of Laurie Penny with the tag-line 'unspeakable things')
/r/MensRights21/07/14 06:25 AM
1

I think sometimes that it might be very easy to get paranoid after reading these boards. The same way feminists are trying to whip up a rape hysteria I think its pretty easy for us to get very paranoid about fake accusations and paternity fraud. Cheers for your story though! (PS -Do try to be respectful towards women and not victim blame, it's not particularly becoming and its catnip for feminists who want to paint us out to be crass misogynists.)
/r/MensRights20/07/14 09:21 PM
1

All possibly/probably true. You were obviously there and can judge a lot better. But sexual assault can make people act very oddly. Often people become hyper-sexualized afterwards in an attempt to reclaim/take ownership of their sexuality back. Personally, I think as a general rule it is best to err on the side of caution. I can imagine it would be quite a surreal situation, being told about a rape during a sexually charged moment. Did she have a baby?
/r/MensRights20/07/14 09:02 PM
1

Are you honestly saying that you think a woman being selective over who they do and don't have sex with is "cruel and inhumane"? They're dressing up to attract people, that doesn't all of a sudden grant you a right over her sexual organs. You're not a dog, or a child and you're not entitled to sex. This place isn't "Men's rights to Rape," it's "men's Rights for Equality in Front of the Law." How on earth can you possibly feel this entitled over somebody else's sexuality? It's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 08:55 PM
-9

Spot on. Worth a trial run at least, see if it does any good. I'm sure it will have more of an effect than "Don't forget not to rape" posters.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 02:55 PM
0

Where are you getting this information? Pretty much any report I have seen of false rape is usually either a pre-meditated revenge, or calculated after the fact again for revenge or to negate consequences for cheating. Where has it been suggested that women go into an unconscious mode? "Need to be taken" sounds very rapey. If you're 'taking' 'unconscious' women and then they claim rape after they 'come to their senses' then that pretty much is rape. I've been with girls who like to be submissive…
/r/MensRights20/07/14 02:19 PM
1

I don't understand the point of writing this out in a public forum. Why would your assertion that she was in "getting some dick mode" hold any bearing on her potential rape? Shit! If a friend comes to you and tells you that they've been raped, why on earth would you not believe her just because she's demonstrated sexuality before? Honestly, next time you get a bonk on imagine getting raped and then being told you wanted it just because you were pitching a tent. This just doesn't make sense. Skep…
/r/MensRights20/07/14 02:12 PM
2

But why on earth would the fact that a woman opened herself up to the possibility of sex have any bearing on an unwanted sexual attack? If you got your wallet out at a market stall ready to buy something and then somebody came along and snatched it would you think "fair enough, I was thinking of spending my money anyway"? Human displays of intersexual selection and the abhorrent crime of rape are as far removed from each other as buying something and being robbed at knifepoint.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 01:54 PM
1

Always best to keep a video record of your plots I find.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 01:11 PM
2

http://chronicle.com/article/In-Making-Campuses-Safe-for/127766/ But is that figure accurate or even plausible? Research on sexual assault is notoriously hard to conduct, and the studies are wildly inconsistent. A 2003 Bureau of Justice Statistics special report, "Violent Victimization of College Students, 1995-2002," found that among the nation's nearly four million female college students, there were six rapes or sexual assaults per thousand per year during the years surveyed. That comes to on…
/r/MensRights20/07/14 04:40 AM
4

The thing that got me about rape culture, was reading all of the jack the ripper newspaper reports, and even in 1888 there was such a backlash to even violent language being used towards women. There were men in Bermondsey getting put in prison for saying "I'll Whitchapel you" to their wives. Our society hasn't been permissive of violence towards women for 100s of years, and the notion of rape culture and permissive domestic violence just seems to be founded upon half-truth readings of history a…
/r/MensRights20/07/14 03:29 AM
4

Oh, well firstly I'd try very hard not to liken a girl in a short skirt to a guy with a wad of 20s. Its too hard to form analogies for rape as its such a unique crime. 90% of rapes are carried out by 3% of men. It'd be good if we can continue to bring that 3% number down. They are unbelievable narcissists and it would be churlish to think that clothing would have any effect on them. In the meantime, standard crime prevention methods that apply to both genders for all violent crimes (don't get so…
/r/MensRights20/07/14 02:57 AM
5

I think that in the abstract, it is easy and correct to say that the victim is not to blame, should never be blamed, cannot be blamed. As soon as it gets to court though there's a lawyer who's job it is to prove that the victim is lying, as that's the only way for the accused to get a fair trial. It would be really good if somebody could come up with a fair system where it didn't have to happen like that.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 02:28 AM
1

Awesome. I was thinking I was going to have to step up and say it at some point just to justify the repetition of the whole thing. I once heard that the comedian Richard Herring, upon hearing of the sudden death of his flatmate's father, sat up waiting for him to come home so he could say "hello, can I just say that I'm delighted to hear about the death of your father." That and "That's awful... erm, what were you wearing?" are the two inappropriate things I'm waiting for an opportunity to roll …
/r/MensRights19/07/14 10:15 PM
1

So where does it come from? I'd understand if it was a part of police questioning that feminists had misappropriated as something people say as a knee-jerk to hearing that one of their mates had been raped, to fulfill that whole rape culture thing. I'm really beginning to think that it has never been said.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 09:29 PM
1

Where the FUCK did this "sexism/racism = prejudice + power" thing come from? I wish I could just change the definition of words to support my stupid ideas.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 08:04 PM
0

Shitty. Would be interesting to see if they could carry over being a twat after the fact.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 07:30 PM
3

What, in a "she's asking for it" sense?
/r/MensRights19/07/14 07:22 PM
2

Surely the oddest part of this is whining about getting woken up. My last gf worked in a pub, would often come home at about 3. I'd often wake up, say a few words and fall asleep. I never thought: "Urgh, what a feckless, useless twat. Coming here, after working a long shift, earning money to pay her half of the rent; mildly inconveniencing me just so she can work and eat and buy me gifts occasionally. What a selfish cunt" Even when she started 'accidentally' elbowing me in the ribs when I was sn…
/r/MensRights19/07/14 06:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter