TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

darkconfidantislife Archive

View 1 post and 18 comments by darkconfidantislife on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Marriage/Childrendarkconfidantislife/r/MensRights15/10/17 05:04 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

It's a neural network, but do realize it's just hallucinating plausible details (source: have trained several of these in the past, I assume it's a GAN), so it's inaccurate and basically useless. But it does give an idea of what someone would look like, and the concept is hilarious.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 11:51 PM
1

I meant the CDC statistics of 1.7M vs 1.5M. Because that implies that there are more men raped by women than the other way around. That's certainly eye opening.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 02:43 AM
5

Wow really? I had thought the prevalence of female on male rape was lower, but according to this it's even higher than male on female rape?? Can you confirm?
/r/MensRights18/11/17 01:41 AM
5

Okay, this opened my eyes. OP, thank you for doing this. This should be stickied or something.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 05:03 PM
8

As someone from the ML community, despite how much they cry about "bias in criminal algorithms" (which I 100% agree with), I guarantee you, they will never care about this because it affects men
/r/MensRights16/11/17 04:47 PM
3

Tortured to death... man I can't imagine a worse way to go :(
/r/MensRights24/10/17 03:46 AM
1

Holy shit, good job!
/r/MensRights17/10/17 05:40 PM
-2

Okay, this I could potentially see, but it's still unfair to presume that someone who was raped was asking for it. I find that to be morally repugnant. OTOH, I could understand saying that "whatever you're doing is kind of risky, so for your own safety maybe don't do that".
/r/MensRights13/10/17 05:43 PM
-3

First of all, I hope you see how morally repugnant that statement is. But also, do you really think the probability is that low?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:19 PM
-4

First of all, I hope you see how morally repugnant that statement is. But also, do you really think the probability is that low?
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:19 PM
6

new shiny model. Hey look dude it is rather sexist to talk about women like this This guy is an expert at counter trolling.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 03:06 PM
1

Yup, I agree for the most part with you on UBI.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 07:22 AM
1

I agree to some extent, but I think that an UBI does mean that if your startup fails then you have a "fallback position" so you won't starve to death.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 07:00 AM
2

I realize this is a men's rights sub, but I've long advocated ubi as a means to reduce risk for prospective female startup founders (and male, but studies suggest that this will help women more). This would also counter the higher IQ spread of men leading to more ultra low IQ men.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 04:21 AM
2

This reminds me of many of the studies purporting sexual harassment to be the number one reason women aren't going into CS, but then when you look at the study, you'll find that nearly as many men were "sexually harassed". Usually this due to an overly broad definition of "sexual harassment", which does nothing but harm REAL victims of sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights29/09/17 04:14 AM
21

Yes, but look at the responses. People are waking up. For one, the myth that women never commit domestic violence is debunked in a comment, pointing out that women are the primary initiators of non-reciprocal domestic violence.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 04:18 AM
2

Ugh r/mgtow is leaking again.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 03:12 PM
1

cough cough to kill a mockingbird cough cough
/r/MensRights09/09/17 04:43 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter