TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

darkon Archive

View 0 posts and 42 comments by darkon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No, I'm suggesting that Gawker has no standards.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 06:35 PM
2

No doubt sexism sells. Gawker is a gossip site; expecting high morals from them is like hitting yourself with a hammer and then complaining it hurts.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 06:19 PM
2

I have no problem with you pointing out Gawker's hypocrisy, I just don't agree with you that /r/MensRights is the proper forum for it. But I'll agree to disagree and leave it at that. I suspect we both have better things to do.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 06:07 PM
-4

I think you're giving Gawker too much credit for actually thinking about what they publish. They just want to make money. If something brings in more eyeballs, they publish it. Violentacrez dug his own hole and now he's fallen into it, with help from a sleazy blogger or whatever Chen is. More page views for Gawker. Hulk Hogan having sex? More page views. I doubt they care very much about feminism, men's rights, or morality of any sort.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 05:07 PM
-14

Sure, they're hypocrites, but what does any of this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights16/10/12 04:37 PM
1

"The problem is not with coathanger but rather penis. Stop being an asshole by saying it's the way they dress." Which? The coathangers or the penises?
/r/MensRights03/10/12 12:06 AM
3

Some fish prefer motorcycles...
/r/MensRights20/09/12 07:20 PM
-1

Well said. I wish I'd said that. :-)
/r/MensRights30/08/12 06:49 PM
3

Sounds like he's riffing on the old joke that "Ginger Rogers did everything Fred Astaire did, only backwards and in high heels."
/r/MensRights30/08/12 03:08 PM
2

The day SRS annexes 2XC is the day I unsubscribe from it. 2XC is a nice place and often has interesting posts and conversations. I've dropped into SRS a few times when they've been involved in some sort of drama and always come away with the impression that they're batshit crazy and trawl through reddit looking for things to be offended by. Granted, there's plenty on reddit that's offensive, but I certainly don't go looking for it: I downvote, maybe leave a comment, and move on. Life's too short…
/r/MensRights03/07/12 06:55 PM
1

Ah. Shows how much I keep up with SRS, I guess.
/r/MensRights08/06/12 04:05 PM
4

I knew I'd seen it before. Still an interesting article.
/r/MensRights10/05/12 04:22 PM
1

Oh, sure, it's far less common for women to pay and be charged excessive child support than it is for men. But it's just as wrong regardless of sex.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 06:34 PM
2

I don't think much of the friend, but unless child support is ridiculously exorbitant I'm in favor of it. If you have children you are responsible for their well-being. This should apply equally to both men and women. Men often draw the short straw when it comes to child support, so yeah, it can be a men's rights issue, but I'd object just as strongly to a woman getting screwed by excessive child support claims.
/r/MensRights05/04/12 02:15 PM
1

I only use one account, and have no use for all the rest of that. Different strokes.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 01:43 PM
1

I hated the neverending reddit. I'd rather click a "next" link. All the so-called conveniences were largely an annoyance to me.
/r/MensRights16/03/12 01:40 AM
2

I tried RES and didn't care much for it. All it did was slow down the loading of reddit. But then, I don't care about tagging accounts, and upvotes/downvotes on comments can be seen with a less obtrusive addon. Viewing multiple subreddits and so on is easily handled by appropriate construction of bookmarks. Shrug. That's just me, though.
/r/MensRights15/03/12 09:16 PM
1

I know what it makes me think of.... "Of course you realize, this means war!" -Bugs Bunny
/r/MensRights09/02/12 01:47 AM
5

Ignoring the strange hypothetical of a person trying to get out of class by claiming rape (huh?), I was mostly sympathetic until I reached this: To me, this pervasive fear [of false accusation of rape] points to a world in which men are aware of an unearned cultural dominance. Since they know their authority has not been obtained but inherited, they fear losing it to a resentful woman, whose only tool in their eyes—one to be used for good or for evil—remains her sexuality. To me, this fear of a …
/r/MensRights02/02/12 09:39 PM
1

Sounds sensible. Thank you.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 01:48 PM
3

Invalid Forum specified. If you followed a valid link, please notify the administrator Mirror?
/r/MensRights03/11/11 02:39 AM
4

One of the comments on the page pointed out that in some states he would have been arrested for recording her without her knowledge.
/r/MensRights08/08/11 03:07 PM
4

OK, so it's a prank, but even if it were true I would oppose it. I'm not especially fond of mandatory sentencing. It removes any chance for a judge to take circumstances into account. I'm not sure what circumstances could justify a false claim of rape, but perhaps that's a lack of imagination on my part. How about recommending a sentence for a false rape claim equivalent to what the accused rapist would had received upon conviction? Does that sound fair? It's actually more harsh than the prank i…
/r/MensRights01/04/11 02:33 PM
1

I've never been to NJ, but I've enjoyed your comments. "Go fuck yourself" and "The state that hates you back"; just wonderful. It reminds me a little of Ron White talking about capital punishment in Texas: "If you kill someone while you're in Texas, we will kill you back."
/r/MensRights22/03/11 09:38 PM
3

If it's true that the male, upon seeing the female make a quick diversion, promptly turned and left in the opposite direction to which either he or the female were originally walking then I would say that the incident was rightly reported as being a suspicious incident, as this only compounds the possibility that the male had gone out of his way to approach the female. It's not very clear from the text, but I get the impression that he walked toward her, getting too close (see below), she ran aw…
/r/MensRights17/09/10 03:22 PM
1

Had to look that up. I recognized the name, and have seen the book Flowers in the Attic lying around various houses, but I've never read any of Andrews' books myself. Now that I've read the wikipedia entry about it, I rather doubt I want to read it.
/r/MensRights19/08/10 07:50 PM
11

A list of "Why beer is better than women" is more entertaining and less arguable. Beer is always wet You can enjoy a beer all month long Your beer will always wait patiently for you in the car while you play baseball A beer label comes off without a fight Beer doesn't get jealous when you grab another beer When you go to a bar, you know you can always pick up a beer Beer never gets a headache A beer won't get upset if you come home and have another beer If you pour a beer right, you'll always ge…
/r/MensRights16/08/10 03:39 PM
1

Primary surviving victims. Fixed that for ya, Hillary.
/r/MensRights28/04/10 09:22 PM
2

I would prefer for abortion to be rare. I don't actually like it much; it's an option of last resort. If it is going to be performed, it should be in the first trimester while the fetus is still a tiny pea-sized blob, and the procedure should take place in an antiseptic place by a qualified professional. Despite my misgivings, I still think it should be legal. It's just not a decision to be made lightly.
/r/MensRights25/04/10 06:04 PM
2

Reminds me of a quote from Pratchett's Men at Arms: "Mad is when you froth at the mouth. Insane is when you froth at the mind."
/r/MensRights05/04/10 06:24 PM
-6

Obvious troll is obvious.
/r/MensRights26/03/10 09:25 PM
6

But they couldn't until Skene's gland was renamed the "female prostate". :-)
/r/MensRights24/03/10 08:06 PM
3

I said she should return it because the ring was a symbol of engagement that she rejected. I agree. If she wanted to break up before he proposed, then saying maybe and keeping the ring is dishonest. Even if she didn't want to break up, the ring was for an engagement, not a out-and-out gift -- unless the guy who proposed explicitly says "Here's a ring. Keep it regardless, but if you'll marry me, it's your engagement ring."
/r/MensRights19/03/10 08:30 PM
7

From the context, it seems to mean Men's Rights Activist.
/r/MensRights15/03/10 08:25 PM
3

With that attitude, I wonder how often he gets laid. What a jerk-off.
/r/MensRights06/02/10 02:26 PM
6

Stupid quiz didn't have an option for "no opinion" or "I don't know" on any of the questions. I get the impression it's designed to find prejudice even if none exists.
/r/MensRights25/09/09 06:32 PM
10

And I travel a LOT! Bwahahahaha!
/r/MensRights23/09/09 09:54 PM
3

Damn, all these breaded women and I'm still eating mine plain.
/r/MensRights11/09/09 02:09 AM
10

I think they all listen to each other too much.
/r/MensRights10/09/09 07:36 PM
9

A suggestion: please describe a link in some fashion so we don't have to go look at it before we know what it is. I've seen that video before, and it's good, but a bare link does not always supply much information about its content. (Yeah, I've probably been guilty of this, too. Do as I say, not as I do. :-) Here's a description: Professor James Duane's now famous 5th Amendment lecture - popularly known as "Don’t talk to the police!".
/r/MensRights18/08/09 03:41 PM
1

Yeah, I could live really well on $35K/month. That's $420K/year.
/r/MensRights17/07/09 03:06 AM
3

Does this mean I get to screw nine women instead of just my wife?
/r/MensRights07/12/08 02:09 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter