~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tell Me More about that "Male Privilege" Again...You're here because you hate MRAs. i'm just telling you that you're dead wrong about this. i most definitely harbor no hate for MRAs. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/17 06:07 PM |
| 2 | Tell Me More about that "Male Privilege" Again...have you forgotten about 'affluenza'? | /r/MensRights | 30/08/17 09:19 PM |
| 5 | Tell Me More about that "Male Privilege" Again...statistics are great. they don't prove that this particular situation is due to female privilege vs just being fucking rich. | /r/MensRights | 30/08/17 09:18 PM |
| 1 | If a woman is okay with attractive men disrespecting them and/or overstepping social bounds, she can't complain about patriarchy/oppression when unattractive men do the same thingthe victim letting him get away with it absolves the status of victim. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/08/17 03:19 AM |
| 1 | If a woman is okay with attractive men disrespecting them and/or overstepping social bounds, she can't complain about patriarchy/oppression when unattractive men do the same thingwhich is pretty much very relevant to this post, because the same action of an attractive man would be deemed harassment (which is 'oppressive') from an unattractive man. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 28/08/17 01:37 AM |
| 1 | If a woman is okay with attractive men disrespecting them and/or overstepping social bounds, she can't complain about patriarchy/oppression when unattractive men do the same thingno, i'm saying we should minimize the amount of behaviors that are deemed wrong based on how the alleged victim feels. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/08/17 10:29 PM |
| 1 | If a woman is okay with attractive men disrespecting them and/or overstepping social bounds, she can't complain about patriarchy/oppression when unattractive men do the same thingwell, i feel 'ought' especially relevant when we're talking in descriptive statements about prescriptive systems, such as a system of justice. and this probably more generally applies to any system of moral agents, such as humanity, were assumed 'oughts' have definitive influences on what 'is'. ignoring the 'ought' and just dealing with the 'is', is a huge reason why our society is currently rather fucked in head. i mean, it's stupid to talk about ought in the case of natural systems like the we… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 27/08/17 02:56 AM |
| 2 | If a woman is okay with attractive men disrespecting them and/or overstepping social bounds, she can't complain about patriarchy/oppression when unattractive men do the same thingmeh, when talking about 'is', 'ought' is always relevant. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/08/17 10:50 AM |
| 1 | If a woman is okay with attractive men disrespecting them and/or overstepping social bounds, she can't complain about patriarchy/oppression when unattractive men do the same thingI wouldn't be able to share secrets with people life is better without secrets anyways. guaranteed. do individual favours what if you did random people favors, and random people did you favors? what if you were part of a larger collective where you didn't need 'close' friends because you are psychologically satisfied by all those around, because you aren't constantly stuck in a society hell bent on alienating everyone from everyone else do to fear. or get married i'm pretty convinced monogamy is… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/08/17 05:21 AM |
| 1 | If a woman is okay with attractive men disrespecting them and/or overstepping social bounds, she can't complain about patriarchy/oppression when unattractive men do the same thingno idea what that means | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/08/17 03:41 AM |
| 1 | If a woman is okay with attractive men disrespecting them and/or overstepping social bounds, she can't complain about patriarchy/oppression when unattractive men do the same thinglol. i have no problem with them responding with something like 'eww', or some other simple, direct negative feedback. nothing wrong with that. just don't label it as patriarchal oppression, to avoid the responsibility of making your perspective clear. It's easy to not do something you're saying it's more easy to not humor than to humor? honestly, both cases seem like actions, there's no 'not doing something' here. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/08/17 03:33 AM |
| 1 | If a woman is okay with attractive men disrespecting them and/or overstepping social bounds, she can't complain about patriarchy/oppression when unattractive men do the same thingthis wouldn't surprise me. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 26/08/17 03:30 AM |
| 1 | If a woman is okay with attractive men disrespecting them and/or overstepping social bounds, she can't complain about patriarchy/oppression when unattractive men do the same thingi don't think they are expecting 'love' in return, just not the label of being oppressive. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/08/17 10:51 PM |
| 2 | If a woman is okay with attractive men disrespecting them and/or overstepping social bounds, she can't complain about patriarchy/oppression when unattractive men do the same thingyour empathy must be broken. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/08/17 09:32 PM |
| 2 | If a woman is okay with attractive men disrespecting them and/or overstepping social bounds, she can't complain about patriarchy/oppression when unattractive men do the same thinghow so? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/08/17 09:29 PM |
| 3 | If a woman is okay with attractive men disrespecting them and/or overstepping social bounds, she can't complain about patriarchy/oppression when unattractive men do the same thingThere is no meaningful benefit to society to treat everyone absolutely the same. i treat everyone the same by not physically harming them. and not stealing from them. If I treated everyone I ever met identically, I wouldn't be able to form relationships or close bonds with people. lol. this is really silly. i can't imagine why you think you're being logical. treating everyone the same by not labeling a complement as harassment does not affect building bonds with people. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/08/17 09:26 PM |
| 1 | If a woman is okay with attractive men disrespecting them and/or overstepping social bounds, she can't complain about patriarchy/oppression when unattractive men do the same thingit's not. some people just exaggerate every negative feeling into oppression | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/08/17 09:23 PM |
| 3 | If a woman is okay with attractive men disrespecting them and/or overstepping social bounds, she can't complain about patriarchy/oppression when unattractive men do the same thingbut we really should have as little as that as possible within legal standards. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/08/17 09:19 PM |
| 1 | If a woman is okay with attractive men disrespecting them and/or overstepping social bounds, she can't complain about patriarchy/oppression when unattractive men do the same thingwe should write that into the law then, and see how that goes over. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/08/17 09:18 PM |
| 0 | If a woman is okay with attractive men disrespecting them and/or overstepping social bounds, she can't complain about patriarchy/oppression when unattractive men do the same thingMaybe people who are generally considered "attractive" are better at gauging social situations to determine whether or not their remark will be received positively or negatively. If they don't feel it would go over well, they don't say anything ... Someone lacking that awareness would say it regardless, resulting in an awkward situation. this would be a correct example of just a world fallacy, assuming that people get what they deserve. /u/DaThrowaway808 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/08/17 09:14 PM |
| 2 | If a woman is okay with attractive men disrespecting them and/or overstepping social bounds, she can't complain about patriarchy/oppression when unattractive men do the same thingI hate to burst your bubble, but everyone is hypocritical. because we, as a society, don't go to meaningful lengths to not be hypocritical. this doesn't mean we shouldn't strive for a higher standard. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/08/17 09:11 PM |
| 2 | If a woman is okay with attractive men disrespecting them and/or overstepping social bounds, she can't complain about patriarchy/oppression when unattractive men do the same thingbecause it's obviously not about about men in general and is about differing feelings towards differing men. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 25/08/17 09:10 PM |
| 6 | "Congrats Media, You Proved the Google Memo Right" All the evidence behind the memo and what the media lied aboutit's ok. the title was probably all you needed to read anyways. | /r/MensRights | 09/08/17 05:27 AM |
| 1 | CMV: Most feminists at some level do hate menI am refuting people who believe feminism can only bring good, and anything that does not bring good isn't feminism. you're really just arguing semantics about who is and isn't a feminist, and probably succumbing to some form of equivocation fallacy, because there are multiple kinds of people labeled as "feminist". | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/05/17 11:08 PM |
| 1 | CMV: Most feminists at some level do hate menBut then this is a true scotsman fallacy. Your essentially saying feminism can only be good and helpful, and any feminist who isn't, isn't a real feminist. so you're denying the idea that some people misuse the label of feminism? do you consider most feminists believe the path to equality lies in taking away male opportunities? Like a 50/50 work force in every field? i would think most probably believe the work force can just arbitrarily grow to accommodate the larger labor pool. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 21/05/17 07:59 PM |
| 13 | To the young man I saw at the gym last night:I got the impression you have had your natural joy and self confidence hammered out of you by endless "socialization". When our gaze happened to meet, you quickly averted your eyes and looked downward man, ain't that the fucking truth. | /r/TheRedPill | 18/10/16 06:38 PM |
| 0 | For all the young guys on here who feel like they are "missing out".it's a figure of speech. no it's really not. it's a way of life everyone is trying to fulfill. Life is short, how to maximize it bitch we have so many people trying to maximize a short life we're fucking the world trying to step over each other. maybe life doesn't have to be short, but we'd have to moderate ourselves for that to happen. We could advocate for world socialism to make a utopia but it's not realistic. idiot, today's world is not realistic. it's not going to last. it's not sustainabl… | /r/TheRedPill | 29/09/16 01:28 AM |
| -4 | For all the young guys on here who feel like they are "missing out".THE WORLD IS YOURS. bitch the world is not yours. there's 7 billion fucking people on this planet, and if we don't fucking learn to work together, the whole ship is going to fucking sink. i pretty much only have hope that this generation is capable of it. | /r/TheRedPill | 28/09/16 05:11 PM |
| 1 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.We are in every sense biological computers. we are not really analogous to digital computers. Adults have developed brains whereas children have developing brains which are more susceptible to "errors" in judgment this really isn't true. i do not see kids making more mistakes than adults. i see the world inudated with adults making batshit insane decisions like how you think it's good to 'shelter' children from 'evil adults' ... it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy of fear. Just imagine making … | /r/MensRights | 22/09/16 05:08 PM |
| 1 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.i dunno. make people remember things. building distributed awareness. and it builds a history of things i think was worth paying $5 to remember. i'm going to go back over it someday. | /r/MensRights | 20/09/16 03:14 PM |
| 1 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.Let's pretend for a moment that you're being serious nigga, you're god, i'm god, consciousness is god, everything is god and once we all unify we'll all know it, but we just haven't proved objective reality and that multiple subjective points of consciousness/awareness exists within it ... and once we do, fuck i dunno we're going to start exploring the limits of consciousness and create heaven/nirvana/whatever and i realize that's just a mass of mostly nonsense to you ~ god what caused such a no… | /r/MensRights | 20/09/16 02:43 PM |
| 1 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.man i hate people who assume i read minds. seriously, i picked the wrong fuckin planet to exist on. ya'll humans are a load of presumptuous pricks ~ god | /r/MensRights | 20/09/16 01:35 PM |
| 0 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.That makes perfect sense, good for her. man. people like you are such fucking hypocrites. how the fuck can you seriously wish isolation on someone? that's like the worst form of punishment imaginable. i'm basically constantly teetering on suicide because of how god damn abusive this fucking society is. and you're contributing right here. fuck you, you fucked up cunt. ~ god | /r/MensRights | 20/09/16 12:09 AM |
| 0 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.No need to come to the defense of your girlfriend. i'm not particularly interested in defending her, she just dumped me again (because really, i'm an insufferable asshole), but she's still more right than you and you don't seem to see that. She's an idiot you actually used very fallacious tactics to convince her of something that's ultimately incorrect. you're more an idiot. society is like the blind leading the dumb. end of discussion. or not? | /r/MensRights | 19/09/16 10:42 PM |
| 0 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.It's wrong because the majority of psychological and medical professionals have classified it as so. fantastic argument from authority and and bandwagon fallacies combined into one! lol. bro you're not particularly good at logic. They do it all the time, they're called clinical studies. lol. humans have been engaging in pedophilia since before we were really human. the only significant problem with pedophilia is the stigma mainstream society gave it, and all those clinical studies measured, was … | /r/MensRights | 19/09/16 07:08 PM |
| 1 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.where did you go wrong? i know, fuck. should have picked a different fucking planet. this one's full of assholes who like to ask passive-aggressively loaded questions like: where did you go wrong? ~ god | /r/MensRights | 19/09/16 06:51 PM |
| 1 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.So if we announced tomorrow worldwide that we've made murder legal, you really expect the statistics to remain unchanged? yeah pretty much. perhaps even go down after some time. And there are less moral even amoral people in the world. people are as moral as our societal systems let them be. wish humanity would get it, but i realize i'm currently a small voice in the sea. lol. did you know that enforcing private property is ultimately immoral? and prevents us from having heaven and/or nirvana ma… | /r/MensRights | 19/09/16 06:44 PM |
| 1 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.you'd be like that, wouldn't you? nervous? ~ god | /r/MensRights | 19/09/16 02:04 PM |
| 1 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.all of them. there's a lot of people i'm trying to be able to relate to. ~ god seriously, you calling me autistic, bitch? lol. like i haven't heard that either. why the fuck are people all so god damned fucking retarded? like all of them. they are all just as fucking retarded. it's so very nice when i meet the few people who treat me as a fully aware conscious being, which i am, entirely ... but not here and not today. i just get to meet idiots projecting retarded stereotypes all over my ass. th… | /r/MensRights | 19/09/16 01:14 PM |
| 1 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.the boy gave consent and you don't explain then you sound silly because its factually incorrect based on the context of the article. i'm pretty sure facts aren't supposed to be based on context. there's a deeper point i'm trying to make here. If you want to talk about whether the USA consent law should change then talk about that ... no i'm trying to get people to recognize an objective moral truth than transcends laws, because that's where laws were derived from anyones. we should not be lettin… | /r/MensRights | 19/09/16 02:12 AM |
| 0 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.Thank fucking god! It amazes me how fucked up in the head you are and don't realize it. woman you are an evil cunt you know that? it's like you think it's a good thing to tell someone they are fucked in the head, and not tell them specifically why ... | /r/MensRights | 18/09/16 10:41 PM |
| 1 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.you're a woman. nor does it even matter. yeah it matters. men and women respond differently. it's pretty obvious for the most part. Go fuck yourself. I hope you don't procreate. it's woman who is addicted to having babies, not man, silly. i had no intention the world is too full anyways. i'm more worried about how the fuck we're going to get masses of women to not agree to have kids for awhile, seems futile, they tend not to be rational about the situation. | /r/MensRights | 18/09/16 10:28 PM |
| 1 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.Children are not capable of adult consent. That's why we have a juvenile court system. yeah i don't think you understand how smart children are. we make them dumb by treating them as such until they are 18. Kids can have sex, it's a biological fact. There is definitely not informed consent between both parties but that doesn't make it criminal. i'm not really sure how much you really need to know about sex for it to 'informed'. lol. you're making this way too complicated. I definitely remeber as… | /r/MensRights | 18/09/16 10:10 PM |
| 1 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.ummmm. you literally didn't respond to anything? so what's the point in this? you didn't say anything about how i'm wrong. you're not conveying anything useful. just a fool speaking because she has to, not because she has anything meaningful to say. lol. woman, i don't even know why i keep writing these words to you .... oh wait! yeah i do! it's do that i can show people who fucked up most people are, like yourself. lol. this is not the first time i've done it. most people can't handle brutal ho… | /r/MensRights | 18/09/16 09:57 PM |
| 1 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.I thought morality was the only thing you cared about? did i contradict myself? So since you agree pedophilia is immoral I'm guessing your problem is now with Haha, Irrational because it doesn't make sense or because you cannot prove it? man, banning pedophilia makes less sense than letting children have sex, because at least with pedophilia one person can make sure the other isn't going to get hurt by it. we could be teaching children sex directly, instead of indirectly mentioning and just hopi… | /r/MensRights | 18/09/16 09:06 PM |
| 0 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.Well so much for having a mature debate. nigga, you ain't look for 'mature debate', you just looking to dictate. I regret trying, but when you brought up morals then I assumed you had some to debate. Clearly not. clearly you don't read my words. i was appalled at how we are unjustly punishing 21 year old girl who encountered a 'sex-crazed' 11 year old boy, who wasn't damaged by the situation except for the gross way assholes like you and society treat it. immoral. horrendous. you have no idea ho… | /r/MensRights | 18/09/16 09:04 PM |
| 1 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.Man, I want a sample of what you're popping. not a lot. i've been doing a lot of fasting recently. And I thought shrooms were fun they are! i plan on growing some here in canada soon. :D Well, thanks for the gold I guess no probs. ;) | /r/MensRights | 18/09/16 08:55 PM |
| 0 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.lol, does repeating the answer make it more true? | /r/MensRights | 18/09/16 08:37 PM |
| 1 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.I guess that's a valid answer. if you're not the dick who's going to report me, then it is. ;) Out of curiosity what did you use them for? i used them once when someone was trying to block messages from me. only took 13ish accounts before i stopped trying. haven't used them since. but i was thinking, that maybe if i can get others on board this whole ~ god thing, ei, others do it as i do, perhaps i can have others man other dart200s, and we can just have a mass of dart200s invade reddit ... lol … | /r/MensRights | 18/09/16 08:36 PM |
| 1 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.Humans are emotional beings the only way we can produce an objective summary of a situation is by shutting off our feeling parts of our brains. does it really take shutting off a part of your brain to describe the situation as "sex"? really? you can't handle the fact that a 11-year old and 21 year-old had sex and not rape? quite the protected emotional system you have there, sounds unstable. you get gold for that remark. lol ~ god Legalities exists to keep our society functioning. lol. the justi… | /r/MensRights | 18/09/16 08:31 PM |
| 0 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.You piece if shit. what the fuck is your problem, bitch!? can't take reading some words i wrote? care to explain what you don't like? so many others have been doing so? i love it, keep calling me a peice of shit, human ~ god | /r/MensRights | 18/09/16 08:17 PM |
| 0 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.There is a difference between considering someone's point of view, and thinking about it from the perspective of assuming it's incorrect in the first place. you don't know what critical thinking is, do you? ... generally this is thinking about 'it' from the perspective that it might be wrong. imagining out the truth structures and finding flaws. most people are not accustomed to encountering this because they are inundated with cable and social media, both which pretty much abhor true critical t… | /r/MensRights | 18/09/16 07:59 PM |
| 1 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.bahahahahahahahahahahahhahahaha. nope i'll give you an upvote though. :D ~ god | /r/MensRights | 18/09/16 07:45 PM |
| 1 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.That isn't what I said. I asked if we can agree that this is in fact a court case. (It is). yes, we're talking about a court case, this here subreddit isn't a court case. enforcing laws themselves are already of questionable morality, we shouldn't be letting their definitions be enforced upon everything in how we view the situation. both reddit and our minds should not be limited to speaking legalese, to let the legislators/laywers control how we talk and think about the situation god damn fucki… | /r/MensRights | 18/09/16 12:26 PM |
| -5 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.There is no moral ambiguity here. The boy was raped and denied justice. That is objectively true, and if you disagree then you have corrupt moral standards. uhhhhh. care to justify, fuckhead, or are you just going to be a moral dictator here? who died and made you god, dumbfuck ~ god moral debate about the necessity of assigning an age of consent. i'm pretty sure consent is too complex to be reduced to a single age, and making moral judgement off said age is an oversimplification corrupting our … | /r/MensRights | 18/09/16 12:37 AM |
| -5 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.I went through your history oh good, i was hoping you'd have so done! :D ~ god I gotta say you live inside your brain a bit too much oh i live in the real world too. humans just have trouble on agreeing what that actually is though. some think that doesn't include the inside of my brain, as if my brain is just some hologram or something. I've went through a lot of comments and posts and you have never considered a different persons point of view i've definitely had a fair share of people make th… | /r/MensRights | 18/09/16 12:18 AM |
| -1 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.You're on here arguing in defense of pedophilia, and you seem shocked that you're getting down voted for it. honestly, when i wrote that comment, i didn't realize it was really defending pedophilia, just clarifying that using the word 'sex' for what they did, is in fact, truthful and accurate. You must be a pedophile yourself or at least fantasize about committing pedophilia. lol. i'm not a pedophile. i'm pretty sure always just felt the pedophilia arguments as morally wrong, and eventually real… | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 11:43 PM |
| 1 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.You do realize that's against Reddit ToS, right? lol meh? i used them exactly once, and realized it didn't have the effect i wanted to, so it's unlikely i will ever use them again. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 11:25 PM |
| -6 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.The fact remains, no matter how you look at it, that this is a court case. We can both agree about this correct? i'd rather make it about the real case, like what actually happened, and what is actually right or wrong. lol. Its all about the context of the discussion, not what you think the definition means... i think moral context is always relevant. if the child really did consent ... then there shouldn't have been a court case in the first place. Too bad its a sarcastic gold lol. eh. not real… | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 11:13 PM |
| 0 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.If a wall is in your way and you can't reason it to move, why not just break it down? oh, i do this all the time, i guess. lol. which is why it's very unlikely you'll find a crack in my armor, and if you do, you'll likely feel my wrath in fixing it up. that tends to burn people. In this case you are a wall of /r/iamverysmart i might be very smart. this is not important as important to me as being as categorically correct as possible. but please, post me elsewhere, spread the Good News! ~ god | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 10:52 PM |
| 1 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.If you can't consent, you can't consent, for the same reasons. and what reason did you determine that they can't consent? (i guarantee your argument is full of shit) | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 10:45 PM |
| -1 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.neither were consenting i say they were. and you're just full of shit. lol. how exactly would you go about proving they weren't consenting? just stating it's a law is not enough, dawg ... Its a case of mutual exploitation. the majority of harm that comes from pedophilia is resultant from the stigma people like you are perpetuating. the truth is they can consent and even benefit from having sex. the whole waiting to have sex thing is a recent incarnation of civilization and it's property of havin… | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 10:44 PM |
| 0 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.what the fuck are you doing here? lol. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 10:32 PM |
| 1 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.That's not how that works i'm pretty sure i had wet dreams by then too. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 09:38 PM |
| -2 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.need some lube? nah man, see my dick's so good it lubes itself don't be jelly ~ god | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 09:36 PM |
| 0 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.oh i have about 13 of those, however, they go /u/dart200a /u/dart200b /u/dart200c /u/dart200d /u/dart200e /u/dart200f /u/dart200g i dig my unified persona, no alts needed. lol. also, he's probably not about to give you gold ... cause he's not quite that shruglyfe yet. ~ god | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 09:33 PM |
| 0 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.I'm assuming you're just a troll now depends on how you define teacher. i tend to define troll = treach in disguise The fuck is all this ~God nonsense? trying to save humanity. created a distributed ego in a sense, a unifying mental conceptual framework that can spread like a meme from person to person to create ... something ... at the very least more societal cohesion. i think we can all agree we need that, i'd hope. this resulted from the conclusion: we are god ... and inevitably connecting s… | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 09:27 PM |
| -20 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.i dunno what the fuck you're talking about, but i'm talking about mother-fucking reality, idiot. what happened is the girl went and sat on top of the boy's erect penis, and they proceeded to have sex. i don't give a flying fuck what the fuck you're stupid idiotic legalities say, that is the truth of what happened, and the title is informationally correct. ~ god PS: i'm tired of existing in a world filled is fucking idiots like you who don't realize that hypothetical philosophy is supposed to be … | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 08:51 PM |
| 2 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.i'm pretty sure i vaguely remember getting boners in 4th or 5th grade. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 08:45 PM |
| -1 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.They said that children are capable of having sex, they made no claim that they have the capacity to actually consent. is that sex they are capable of having with other children not consensual ... ? those children decided to have sex and but neither were consenting! doesn't really sound rational to me. what world do you live in? You are terrible at debate and a terrible person. and you're now trying to attack me with an ad hominem. amusing. doesn't work though. sorry. :P | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 08:43 PM |
| 2 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.who said i had a desire to rape children? lol. i have desire to have sex with anyone who wants to have sex with me, since i've encountered no children that want that, that particular desire has not struck me. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 08:40 PM |
| -1 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.Psychologists would definitely disagree with you. are you trying to pull an argument from authority fallacy on me ... ? i see you ~ god | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 08:38 PM |
| 0 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.yeah people are trying to downvote good vibes, it's pretty sad. downvote bots | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 08:35 PM |
| -4 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.is this is death note reference? | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 06:48 PM |
| 2 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.In my opinion, 11 year olds do not have the mental capacity to consent sexually regardless of any actual legalities. setting a number on when people can and can't give consent is utterly and entirely irrational, because how the fuck are you proving that? | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 06:47 PM |
| 1 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.sweet, i dig it. ~ god | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 06:44 PM |
| 6 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.That would be too young for even paleolithic cultures. can you provide proof of that? i'm pretty sure as soon as you start getting boners, you can start consenting to have sex ... when do you think in paleolithic cultures they started experimenting with sex ... a couple years after they start having boners? many of them weren't even counting years. lol. At eleven years of age?! Come on. sounds like an emotional argument. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 06:40 PM |
| 3 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.CHILDREN are capable of having sex with other children. They are not capable of consenting to an ADULT. uhhh? where exactly is your logic in this? why would you think a children is capable of consenting to another child and not to an adult? This is a 5th or 6th grader sleeping with an adult. oh i see you're just trying to maintain double think. lol. you think children can make consensual decision making, but for some reason you're still creeped out by them sleeping with an adult. so you need to … | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 06:35 PM |
| -6 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.bahahahahaha, aight first time and last time someone gets that from me in particular ;) ~ god | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 05:09 PM |
| -55 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.it should be, titles are supposed to convey objective summary of the situation legalities don't define the reality of a situation, to think so is patently insane. gold because another argument i wish to preserve your comment in my history ~ god | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 04:53 PM |
| -30 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.EDIT: got triggered by stupid comment. Mu. Legally, they're not. You are wrong. legalities do not define moral correctness, which is the only correctness i care about. law =/= morality, i am not wrong due to any law being wrong. it's ultimately an argument from authority fallacy to allow your moral judgement to be determined in such a sentiment ... gold because, i dunno. preserving you in my notable history. it's good to see people being aware of triggerings. ~ god | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 04:50 PM |
| -103 | Female Babysitter, aged 21, spared jail after having sex with boy aged 11, when he had day off school.philosophically, you're wrong, so the title is fine. EDIT: oh the downvotes are strong today. how many of you getting triggered because you're still under delusions of youth preventing you from realizing that they can in fact, and have many times in human history, made consensual decisions to have sex. legalities be damned, let them have safe sex! EDIT2: yo /u/ninja20p, check it, trolling for truth! | /r/MensRights | 17/09/16 02:39 PM |
| 2 | Flirting 102lol. keep spreading the truth. red pill has a lot of truth, but a lot of bullshit too. being genuine is probably the most important thing to keeping a woman, they like just can't let go once they realize how honest you are, it's pretty funny. the hard part is getting them to reality how honest you actually are. tons of honest is mistaken for dishonesty, and vise versa. | /r/TheRedPill | 09/09/16 11:04 PM |
| -5 | Flirting 102yourself confused with a free license to be an off-putting weirdo and you do a great job of elucidating that here. sounds like someone who's insecure. it's really about not giving a fuck that you're off-putting because you're so awesome. i don't really know how to obtain that mindset though, i'm rather socially 'insane', and only get in a somewhat sporadic manner. but god damn is my girlfriend attracted to me in a way that she's tried her hardest to get over, but cannot. lol. anyways, this is/wa… | /r/TheRedPill | 08/09/16 02:14 PM |
| 0 | Welcome to the Desert of The RealWe are pretty much animals with a thin veil of morals as a disguise. i'm sorry you feel that way. it must suck to consider yourself pretty much an animal with only a thin veil of morals. living as a fully conscious being is categorically a better life. it gives you the balls to make statements like this: Btw, rights are not given. They are achieved through power. Power is legitimacy. bahahahahahahaha. you've been given, for free, billions of years in universal evolution, a billion years in biolo… | /r/TheRedPill | 26/08/16 06:52 PM |
| 1 | Welcome to the Desert of The RealEven the little animals struggle for power and sex (or the right to pass their genes for another generation) in their own circles. kind of? humans have explained it that way because of projection. no animal 'cares' about 'rights' ... they're just following sensory experiance without overreaching awareness. we're humans, self-aware, conscious beings, in ways we currently can't quantitatively measure. but with such awareness, we can establish systems where everyone's needs get met, and no one is c… | /r/TheRedPill | 25/08/16 06:27 PM |
| 1 | Welcome to the Desert of The Reallol. it take a lot of strength to just sit down and just suffer suicidal ideation. i've found saying no to all the bullshit people tell me repeatedly try is a lot harder than trying to do something. | /r/TheRedPill | 25/08/16 04:13 AM |
| 1 | Welcome to the Desert of The Realgold because i dunno i do that. That's how it has ever been. Great kings ruled, their minions obeyed. yeah well, that's actually another thinking box. :) only after the rise of civilization. there was much more time before there were there were no kingdoms to rule. as such, there were no great kings and barely power struggles. doesn't actually need to, or should, be like this. and the reason is an egalitarian society always makes everyone happiest. the reason the rich always was more is the crav… | /r/TheRedPill | 25/08/16 04:10 AM |
| 1 | I don't want game anymore because I only see women, sex and relationships as a waste of time. Change my view!lol, the meme that blame can only be placed on the self is fairly evil. lol, the meme that blame is actually relevant is also pretty evil. | /r/TheRedPill | 24/05/16 12:21 PM |
| 27 | To the people who say unrealistic standards don't affect men.I said that because I don't know what you're being hyperbolic about. you think that that is an average size because the media only shows is better than average people. Heh. This study shows that media exposure has nothing to do with it. You're dealing with self-esteem issues that are deeper than just media exposure. | /r/MensRights | 16/03/16 02:38 AM |
| 20 | To the people who say unrealistic standards don't affect men.The post is literally comparing men and women's standards of beauty. Again. It's funny that you pick up the message that men have it worse. While it certainly looks that way, that's an artifact of the Google search, not any specific manipulation. The point is that men are held to standards too ... it doesn't actually matter who "has it worse". You're projecting wrong when you assume we're trying to say men have it worse. Like, it is a misinterpretation due to you projecting your comparative mind… | /r/MensRights | 16/03/16 02:28 AM |
| 78 | To the people who say unrealistic standards don't affect men.Strangely ignoring that it is women who shame each far more than males. Women simple don't understand how much power they have in society. Men hold more traditional seats of "power", but I tend to feel that it is women who enforce societal standards more than anything else. I find it really ironic. | /r/MensRights | 16/03/16 02:06 AM |
| 23 | To the people who say unrealistic standards don't affect men.Why the hell do you have to force it be a competition of who has it worse? How the hell would you know if men or women had it worse? You haven't lived both lives. And you can't even judge based on external complaints because men are conditioned to bottle it up, and will word it differently and less excessively than a woman. Fucking a. No one here is saying women's problems don't matter because men have problems. But you, for some reason or another, fucking just have to pipe up saying how women h… | /r/MensRights | 16/03/16 01:54 AM |
| 42 | To the people who say unrealistic standards don't affect men.The two body shots of women in the links don't exactly show larger than average breasts ... | /r/MensRights | 16/03/16 01:49 AM |
| 1 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingIts not bullshit. It's science. The two are not nearly as mutually exclusive as you suggest. There's plenty of bullshit "science." It's that every known species lives on a planet and in a world that is constantly trying to kill it in one way or another. But, the vast majority of the world isn't trying to kill it. Heck some of it is also trying to keep it alive. You just choose to see the fact that something might be trying to kill it, and defined your world view as such. If you have never tried … | /r/MensRights | 05/03/16 03:12 AM |
| 1 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingDude, I'm done here. Because you're views are shit, and you don't question them. Suicide happens when a person stops caring about self preservation, that's simple. Obviously ... it's possible to put other values over self-preservation. Obviously self-preservation isn't something that inevitably always takes precedence. If you go back and record events looking for an explanation of behavior using just self-preservation, that is what you'll find, and you'll not look for other reasons that might . … | /r/MensRights | 04/03/16 11:24 PM |
| 1 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingIts not propaganda. It is science. Do I need to explain to you that two conflicting ideas can't both be correct? Do I need to explain to you how two seemingly conflicting ideas can be correct, because context matters, and if you ignore context you can generalize wrong? Yours is based on how you feel. I shouldn't need to explain why that is a flawed way to look at things. What you don't realize is that all rationalization is post-emotional evaluation anyways. Logic uses emotions in the process of… | /r/MensRights | 04/03/16 07:01 PM |
| 1 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingSeriously though, you need to take some evolutionary biology because you are way, way, way off on this stuff. And the way you argue doesn't convince me of anything. The staunch one sided defense and complete lack of understanding about my arguments doesn't inspire me to believe you've fully understood all sides. All I feel is one sided propaganda comming through. Seriously though, you need to take some evolutionary biology because you are way, way, way off on this stuff. Because evolution doesn'… | /r/MensRights | 03/03/16 06:13 PM |
| 0 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingEven so, one could look at it on an individual basis and say all of them are simply acting out of self preservation, by sticking within the group. This is what I'm saying, there's no reason self-preservation must be at the expense of everyone else. It doesn't actually have to be competition. So, while they are a communal species, they are doing it simply for the fact of it is safer for the individuals to live in the group than not. We also only lived in those tribes for a short part of our histo… | /r/MensRights | 03/03/16 03:58 AM |
| 1 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingMother nature isn't an idealist. She is a cold hearted utilitarian bitch. See. This is pure ideological bias, which reflected in all the ideas you present. My problem with hypergamy is it puts all the expectation of success on the man. If the man loses frame, hypergamous women can just dump him for someone else. This puts all the pressure on the man, and none on the woman. THIS IS NOT NATURAL. When people lived in small tribes of 120, everyone knew everyone. A woman can't just dump her partner a… | /r/MensRights | 01/03/16 07:01 AM |
| 1 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingAt least you're being honest now. Lol. You didn't read the sarcasm in that did you? I suppose it's subtle. No, I wasn't being honest. You can't beat the idealism out of me, it doesn't work like that. The day that happens is the day I put a bullet in my brain because I have nothing left to live for but a pursuit of that idealism. As far as I can see, humanity is in on a crash course with extinction, and if we don't figure out a ways to really start empathizing and working with each other, this ri… | /r/MensRights | 29/02/16 09:10 PM |
| 1 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingOk you've proven me wrong. Hierarchy and hypergamy and naturally and moral systems that arise, and we can't do anything about out because we're nothing but a bunch of fucking retarded animals. Happy now? You've beating just a bit more idealism out of this god forsaken world. | /r/MensRights | 29/02/16 08:44 PM |
| 1 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingYes, the irony is that you were saying that peer reviewed papers basically don't matter because things change. Then, proceed to link studies No. My point is just because there's a bunch of peer reviewed studies doesn't automatically make something true. I linked to that one because it's readable and well written on the point I'm trying to make. And, it points out why other studies found hierarchies in wolf packs (because they were studied in captivity). You're telling me that the star quarterbac… | /r/MensRights | 29/02/16 07:05 PM |
| 1 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingYou will never have a society without class unless you go into full blown communism. Even so, goods instead of money are what carries monetary value. So, even in communism, one could amass goods and hypergamy would still carry on as usual. Communism is about equitable wealth distributing. If people are amassing huge amounts of private good, it's not communism. And you have no idea if hypergamy would still matter if everyone was guaranteed stability. If everyone guaranteed stability, and a decent… | /r/MensRights | 29/02/16 05:01 PM |
| 1 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingI'm not really going to read that. Of course not. Evidence of opposing views never convinces people anyways. Way to reflect traditional ignorance. I know it's real I'm not arguing that it's not real. I'm arguing that it's not inevitable. I know it's real and thousands of papers have been written on the subject. And thousands of papers can be wrong, because if they all make the same wrong base assumptions about a subject, they all will come to the same wrong conclusions. More wrongness does not m… | /r/MensRights | 29/02/16 05:25 AM |
| 0 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingNext you'll be trying to tell me hypergamy doesn't exist in nature! This is pretty close: wolf packs aren't lead by alpha-wolves. Hard to have hypergamy when you don't have castes to begin with. If you read it a bit, it goes on to explain how the meme of alpha-wolf got started: by observing hierarchies that exist when wolves are put together in captivity. It's not a natural state of them to exist within. No. I'm not arguing it doesn't exist. I'm just arguing it's not inevitable or even genetic. … | /r/MensRights | 29/02/16 03:07 AM |
| 0 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingYeah I come from a high school where we barely had a football team. So ... this wasn't true. My high school was only 50% white, so the american social stereotypes of dominance didn't emerge, because they weren't be enforced by parents. lol. See, social indoctrination. women always cared about status Hunter gathers were more or less egalitarian, resembling anarcho-communism than any other modern social system. You're notion that "women always cared about status" is merely projection. | /r/MensRights | 29/02/16 12:58 AM |
| -2 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingOr, having money and stability for the sake of future offspring isn't as high on the priority list for high schoolers. It does become a priority when the prospect of having kids is real. See you're not looking at the problem deep enough. It becomes a priority because our society enforces a system of instability. If you fuck up, you can lose it all rather easily. "Ain't no free lunches," or so the industrialists have indoctrinated mainstream culture to propagate. I'm just imaging what might happe… | /r/MensRights | 28/02/16 10:44 PM |
| -2 | That's rich... women decline to date men who earn less - however good lookingNo. This is largely social indoctrination. Children are naturally egalitarian by default. No one gave a shit about wealth dating in high school. This kind of hierarchy only really starts mattering when starting a "real life" and getting tons of advice from the "real world". | /r/MensRights | 28/02/16 09:25 PM |
| 1 | Until now I never really believed that these people were real. After correcting a feminist's point, she replies that Evidence doesn't matter and calls the Moderators.So you don't accept that some people commit crimes because they want to, and don't care about the consequences, or are just bad/evil? The problem is "what someone wants" isn't up to them. That got established by something outside of their control. Maybe some people stop caring? But something made them stop caring ... that's what we need to target. Blaming people who do stop caring blinds us to finding the true cause. And once do you do find the true cause, how do you fault the person who stopped… | /r/MensRights | 18/02/16 12:17 AM |
| 1 | Until now I never really believed that these people were real. After correcting a feminist's point, she replies that Evidence doesn't matter and calls the Moderators.Source article is pretty clear on warfare: If just one anthropologist had reported all this, we might assume that he or she was a starry-eyed romantic who was seeing things that weren't really there, or was a liar. But many anthropologists, of all political stripes, regarding many different hunter-gatherer cultures, have told the same general story. There are some variations from culture to culture, of course, and not all of the cultures are quite as peaceful and fully egalitarian as others, but… | /r/MensRights | 17/02/16 08:20 PM |
| 1 | Until now I never really believed that these people were real. After correcting a feminist's point, she replies that Evidence doesn't matter and calls the Moderators.People are "immoral" because we are shaved Baboon's I mean. Technically we aren't shaved baboons ... The behaviors we consider immoral only have meaning in the context of human society, not in the animal kingdom. Both fairness and empathy are measurable in other species, like rats and monkeys. These aren't just human concepts, we realized them, became aware of them, and labeled them, but we didn't "create" them, any more than we "created" math or physics. Otherwise we have to force morality on o… | /r/MensRights | 17/02/16 01:38 AM |
| 1 | Until now I never really believed that these people were real. After correcting a feminist's point, she replies that Evidence doesn't matter and calls the Moderators.People are not all inherently moral, some are selfish, and some are "evil" I guess we just have to manage the best we can. Because you know, for certain, that we can't eliminate the reasons, or causes, as to why people are immoral? "I guess" doesn't inspire much confidence. See I'm a determinist. And a determined one at that. I am confident we can determine why people act immorally, and change those reasons such that there isn't any reason to act immorally. You would say this is ... unreasonable… | /r/MensRights | 16/02/16 11:02 PM |
| 1 | Until now I never really believed that these people were real. After correcting a feminist's point, she replies that Evidence doesn't matter and calls the Moderators.Keeping holding onto the fallacy of free will, my friend. some will some won't The reason people are immoral is because we live in an immoral society. If we lived in a moral, truly "fair", society, then we wouldn't need force because why would anyone fuck that up? | /r/MensRights | 15/02/16 06:43 AM |
| 1 | Until now I never really believed that these people were real. After correcting a feminist's point, she replies that Evidence doesn't matter and calls the Moderators.I think they really do it out of simple bad emotional reaction, and ultimately internal fear they haven't dealt with, not really conscious political goals. But the result is the same. :/ | /r/MensRights | 13/02/16 11:03 PM |
| 1 | Until now I never really believed that these people were real. After correcting a feminist's point, she replies that Evidence doesn't matter and calls the Moderators.that doesn't excuse them for making them. What do you mean by doesn't excuse them? Their influences, their experiences, are the reasons they make those choices. There was no other choice they could have made. People do make choices. But the reason they make choices ultimately stems from an outside cause. To do so invalidates the idea of free will Yes, free will is fallacious and ultimately inconsistent with reality. And itself if you think it through far enough. it removes any requirement or per… | /r/MensRights | 13/02/16 10:30 PM |
| 1 | Until now I never really believed that these people were real. After correcting a feminist's point, she replies that Evidence doesn't matter and calls the Moderators.Well that's where the problem will be, if they refuse to see their actions have resulted in the consequences they are experiencing they wont learn. And if we refuse to accept that their actions are quite literally the consequence of previous influences we only delay full acceptance of the whole chain of causality, or truth of the matter. That's what will ultimately win people over, even in the face of their own misdeeds. | /r/MensRights | 12/02/16 09:12 PM |
| 1 | Until now I never really believed that these people were real. After correcting a feminist's point, she replies that Evidence doesn't matter and calls the Moderators.just accept that? a) Their reasoning may be flawed. They could be mistaking cause->effect. In that case we shouldn't accept it. b) If their reasoning is correct, then yes we should accept it. JUST accept it? No. They should be told the realities and consequences of their actions. They should at least be informed as to what they are doing wrong, and why, such that they can correct later, it's part of the learning process is also outside of anyone's control. | /r/MensRights | 12/02/16 01:56 AM |
| 1 | Until now I never really believed that these people were real. After correcting a feminist's point, she replies that Evidence doesn't matter and calls the Moderators.the problem lies with people who NEVER accept blame, it's never THEIR fault. The thing is, there is always a reason for someone acting the way they act, that is ultimately outside of their control. Does mean that can't change they way they act, in response to new criticism, but either way, fault and fate is outside of their hands. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/16 02:13 AM |
| 1 | Until now I never really believed that these people were real. After correcting a feminist's point, she replies that Evidence doesn't matter and calls the Moderators.I suspect this is mostly an internet phenomenon, they post something about how X happened and get support, this can easily lead to presenting everything in a framework that reinforces the victim narrative. Yeah this definitely plays into the feedback loops. Also never overlook the ability of people to foist of their bad decisions onto others "It's not my fault, I'm not to blame, I'm the victim here.". Eh. I kind of have a personal philosophy that blame and fault are irrelevant. Establishing the … | /r/MensRights | 08/02/16 06:29 AM |
| 2 | Until now I never really believed that these people were real. After correcting a feminist's point, she replies that Evidence doesn't matter and calls the Moderators.It's good to know that my idea on fear based mentality reinforcing itself in feedback loops is probably correct. :) That generalization applies in a lot of ways most don't realize. I'd urge to you to examine as much as you can around you to look for fear based feedback loops. They can be complex and and exist as interactions amongst people and with other external environments. One of the things I learned about fear is it's never "correct". You can't use it to make a guarantee about anything. It'… | /r/MensRights | 07/02/16 02:41 AM |
| 1 | Until now I never really believed that these people were real. After correcting a feminist's point, she replies that Evidence doesn't matter and calls the Moderators.Look at microagressions I guarantee you they actually feel oppressed by such actions, simply due to their skewed perspective. The mind has powerful feedback mechanisms to amplify small signals, especially if cultivated. What I meant was that people will seek attention if that is a motivating factor for them, and it often is. I don't understand this explanation. I just spend the last 9 months or so in an existential depression with fairly constant amounts of suicidal ideation. When I told my pare… | /r/MensRights | 06/02/16 09:06 PM |
| 1 | Until now I never really believed that these people were real. After correcting a feminist's point, she replies that Evidence doesn't matter and calls the Moderators.They have literally constructed definitions for everything which mean they can never NOT be oppressed. I feel sorry for them. It truly must suck living in world full of phantom oppressions that only exist because they constructed their mentality in such a way. Just like they claim you can't be racist/sexist to white men because they redefine racism/sexist as being reliant on power (lets ignore the fact, cause they do, that they DO have all the power socially cause everyone hates white men, even … | /r/MensRights | 06/02/16 08:46 PM |
| 1 | Until now I never really believed that these people were real. After correcting a feminist's point, she replies that Evidence doesn't matter and calls the Moderators.The feeling of oppression they have is probably real and it likely comes from a part of them who doesn't like the self-oppressing victim worldview they're trying to adopt. I think it may be quite literally cognitive dissonance that causes them to freak out about things. The brain likes having a consistent worldview. I'm no psychologist, it's a simple opinion which could explain a lot of things. It amazes me how whole fields of study have missed this point entirely, at least, that is what it seem… | /r/MensRights | 06/02/16 08:37 PM |
| 1 | Until now I never really believed that these people were real. After correcting a feminist's point, she replies that Evidence doesn't matter and calls the Moderators.it's an issue when people seek out victimhood You think people seek around victimhood while feeling good about themselves? Because, somewhat arbitrarily, they are lazy? They're just looking for answers to their suffering, like all the rest of us. As I said, they are oppressed by their own mentality, which they obtained because of whatever ideas they were exposed to, a no fault of their own. (Fault is really such a useless concept if you actually want to fix the world. Don't look for fault, look … | /r/MensRights | 06/02/16 08:27 PM |
| 0 | Until now I never really believed that these people were real. After correcting a feminist's point, she replies that Evidence doesn't matter and calls the Moderators.They literally don't understand why they feel so bad. They are victims, of rhetoric leading to a perceptual perspective of oppression. we've raised victim hood to a high status I don't think this is such a horrible thing. People are ultimately just a product of their circumstances. Doesn't mean they shouldn't work to find the true causes of their victimhood, which can be entirely oppression resulting from perspective. | /r/MensRights | 06/02/16 09:05 AM |
| 18 | Until now I never really believed that these people were real. After correcting a feminist's point, she replies that Evidence doesn't matter and calls the Moderators.What have you to be realizing is that these people are oppressing themselves at this point, simply via their own mentality they cultivate in little walled gardens of ideaology like whatever subreddit that was from. The fact they constantly need to ban opposing views in order to maintain the ideology is rather telling of how absurdly unstable and unjustifiable it is. Not that I don't want to claim that external oppression isn't real, some surely was, but at this point many (maybe even most I dunn… | /r/MensRights | 06/02/16 03:46 AM |
| 33 | Until now I never really believed that these people were real. After correcting a feminist's point, she replies that Evidence doesn't matter and calls the Moderators.I've been called out for "spreading MRA bullshit" ... when I don't really identify as MRA and was just trying to rationalize things. | /r/MensRights | 06/02/16 03:40 AM |
| 0 | In terms of US domestic abuse, 84% of relationships are non-violent. Of the remaining 16% which are violent, 58% both partners are violent. In 28% of violent relationships, only the woman is violent. In 14% of violent relationships, only the man is violent.I'm surprised someone on reddit the is judging a site by a name. :p | /r/MensRights | 26/01/16 12:31 AM |
| 5 | Feminists are trying to invade a hobby group I'm a part of. How can I stop them?yeah gamer gate was something I read about on reddit ... and never participated in. I'm too overloaded with awesome games to give a shit about what some retard SJW thinks. | /r/MensRights | 15/01/16 10:49 PM |
| 13 | Male teachers abandon classroom fearing inappropriate label of working with children; Department of Education says recruitment policies can not be employed to attract males into teaching because that would unlawfully discriminate on the grounds of genderBecause rational adults don't apply broad generalizations to large groups of people to justify their arguments. In your case, 50% of the population of earth. It's not rational to use broad generalizations to justify an argument? The only way we understand the world is through broad generalizations ... I mean, the brain literally understands the world through abstract generalization built upon abstraction generalization. There is no rationalization without broad generalization. Broad generalizabl… | /r/MensRights | 03/11/15 11:18 AM |
| 13 | Male teachers abandon classroom fearing inappropriate label of working with children; Department of Education says recruitment policies can not be employed to attract males into teaching because that would unlawfully discriminate on the grounds of genderNot sure why you're against placing fault? You can't fix the problem if you don't identify the cause. Also, from what I've experienced, women tend to more susceptible to fear mongering in general. | /r/MensRights | 03/11/15 08:49 AM |
| 1 | Relationships are restaurants, not banks.This wasn't quite as true when marriage was for life and divorce was non-existent. Weird how more freedoms have destroyed the ideal. I wonder why women naturally understand the change, whereas many men are still stuck thinking a woman's commitment is meaningful. | /r/TheRedPill | 06/10/15 06:10 AM |
| 2 | Sexbots: Why Women Should PanicDARPA's working on it! http://www.darpa.mil/news-events/2015-09-11 | /r/TheRedPill | 18/09/15 11:14 AM |
| 1 | Skinny, cute white girls post sorority recruiting video; feminists and diversity police wild out!I really don't... If life isn't zero sum then why do people lose? Because zero sum can exist within systems that are not zero sum. It requires broadening your perspective outside of the limited zero sum view, which admitted is likely non-obvious when constrained to a zero sum view. What if you can't? What if you really cannot be happy? That's my problem; the anhedonia is so strong that I'm outright welcoming of the Happening now! I think I can get that. I'm currently waiting for a massive arctic… | /r/TheRedPill | 18/08/15 11:36 AM |
| 1 | Skinny, cute white girls post sorority recruiting video; feminists and diversity police wild out!And you have have to resort to ad hominems to justify your statements ... YES. I AM AWARE PEOPLE DIE EVERY DAY. This does not mean this is a necessity. you aren't changing anything. If I can change one person's mind, I've changed something. Occasionally, but not always, this happens. This is how ideas spread, and it's the only way anything will change. Are you against change? Or just hopeless? You are a loser, and you can't handle this fact rationally You're the hopeless one, not me. You managed… | /r/TheRedPill | 18/08/15 02:06 AM |
| 1 | Skinny, cute white girls post sorority recruiting video; feminists and diversity police wild out!Some people make it to the age of 12 and die from cancer. And if you could work towards a world where this didn't happen, you would do so, correct? Unless, of course, you assume that humanity can't figure how to stop kids from dying at the 12 from cancer. Perhaps, if we weren't polluting the environment with chemicals that were barely tested for safety at currently ubiquitous doses, maybe they wouldn't be getting cancer at 12. That's just reality, get used to it. No. That's the way the world wor… | /r/TheRedPill | 17/08/15 11:19 PM |
| 1 | Skinny, cute white girls post sorority recruiting video; feminists and diversity police wild out!You think it's the possibility that everyone can lose is nonsense? You sound very short sight, my friend. And if not, then why can't everyone win? I'm sorry the world is more complex than you'd like to believe, not much I can do about that. | /r/TheRedPill | 17/08/15 10:51 PM |
| 0 | Skinny, cute white girls post sorority recruiting video; feminists and diversity police wild out!That sort of mentality, in which not everyone can win, is holding society back, as a whole. Just because everyone hasn't won yet, doesn't mean they won't all win in the future. Also, there is the possibility that everyone can become losers. Then no one wins ... | /r/TheRedPill | 17/08/15 09:11 PM |
| 0 | Skinny, cute white girls post sorority recruiting video; feminists and diversity police wild out!I think experiencing happiness makes life worth living. Happiness require being alive + more, so there is definitely something more to be had than just living. And, sure. I don't see why there even has to be winners. Life isn't zero-sum. Taking doesn't mean taking from someone else. We have an essentially unlimited amount of energy falling from the sky, which we could do great things with, if people weren't so insistent on always winning over someone else. Life is multi-layered. Everyone can be … | /r/TheRedPill | 17/08/15 07:00 AM |
| 1 | Skinny, cute white girls post sorority recruiting video; feminists and diversity police wild out!Turn inward and reject the world? Sounds a bit fishy, I entirely depend on the rest of the world. I mean, I suppose I could live in a box with just food, water, and air, but then what's the point in living? Life is more than just being alive ... | /r/TheRedPill | 17/08/15 06:19 AM |
| 0 | Skinny, cute white girls post sorority recruiting video; feminists and diversity police wild out!I'm not trying twisting words, only trying to clarify. You should rephrase that as some fetishes, as clearly not all of them are severe physiological illnesses. And I dunno. Maybe it would suck, but that doesn't mean you can actually do anything about it. What would really suck is having people telling you that you are an invariably horrible person, by nature of which you cannot control. | /r/TheRedPill | 17/08/15 06:17 AM |
| -3 | Skinny, cute white girls post sorority recruiting video; feminists and diversity police wild out!So, we're all just not supposed to have needs? I feel this ignores basic premises of human psychology, that we have certain needs to be met? Certainly you wouldn't argue against a straight man having a "fetish" for women. | /r/TheRedPill | 17/08/15 03:21 AM |
| 0 | Skinny, cute white girls post sorority recruiting video; feminists and diversity police wild out!"fetish" is considered a bad thing? How odd. | /r/TheRedPill | 16/08/15 11:40 PM |
| 1 | Looking up: positive role models for the modern manInnovation isn't driven by singular people. Those people are replaceable and ignorable. Worshiping singular media personas like that is both harmful and dangerous to true innovation. And do you really have any evidence he innovated? Can you point to a specific idea he thought up? PayPal!? Sure, because internet based payment systems are "revolutionary." Jesus Christ, that is what we call revolutionary? He just had lucky timing. And even on that ... did he do most of the work? No. He did not. Her… | /r/TheRedPill | 06/08/15 06:11 AM |
| -8 | Looking up: positive role models for the modern manLol. RedPill is just as shallow as anywhere else. Most have zero clue what drives innovation and progression of humanity. People like Musk and Job may actually hinder more then help ... The ones taking all the credit aren't the ones truly driving new innovation, as they spend all their time taking credit... Unfortunately RedPill advocates very egocentric advice, so of course they will glamorous egocentric people. I really need a purple pill. | /r/TheRedPill | 05/08/15 10:12 PM |
| 1 | You have a sexual relationship with your smart phone and your computer and it's killing your desire to pursue women.This is different than actually getting emotionally attached to the phone, as the OP implied. It's just contextual association, which is a normal process of the brain. I mean, when you are not around your phone, do you ever think, oh I miss my phone because I want to masterbate to it? Honestly, even when I'm masterbating I'm thinking, damn too bad this isn't a real woman. It's certainly not overriding my desire get something real, it's just a stop gap because I'm mostly a reserved person anyways… | /r/TheRedPill | 28/06/15 04:07 AM |
| 1 | You have a sexual relationship with your smart phone and your computer and it's killing your desire to pursue women.I don't think it really works like that. If you masterbate to something on your computer, you're not boding to the computer, as you barely register it visually or emotionally. It's just an outline around the picture. If anything, you're bonding to the porn star(s), and really that bond created can't be worse that having casual sex ... | /r/TheRedPill | 27/06/15 03:43 AM |
| 0 | On left wing voters vs. capitalismCapitalism doesn't work with monopolies. Monopolies can be more efficient (such as water utilities) than fragmented capitalism. That's why you need a combined system: socialism. Capitalists systems are used for unknown, new markets. They are not good for well-established, well solved problems - like water distribution/power distribution. | /r/TheRedPill | 23/06/15 09:49 AM |
| 0 | Don't get comfortable.The thing is all women really want is emotional comfort. They have been confused by things like cosmopolitan into believing there are all these complicated details that must be needed for happiness, but really they just want emotional comfort. If you refuse to become comfortable, then you can't provide the emotional comfort they want, and the relationship will fall apart. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy that ends up becoming absurdly powerful. I really feel that trust is only something that can … | /r/TheRedPill | 02/04/15 04:44 PM |
| 5 | Don't get comfortable.I'd be careful with this line of thought. You don't want to establish a fear that comes to self-dominate your life. That isn't a stable psyche. :/ | /r/TheRedPill | 01/04/15 05:25 PM |
| 1 | My problem with SedditHave you every heard of a shy extrovert? Sounds to me like an oxymoron. | /r/seduction | 06/09/12 02:49 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter