TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dart22 Archive

View 0 posts and 14 comments by dart22 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

I don't think a trans man would phrase it like "I was born female" but I don't know enough about identity phrasing to be sure.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/21 08:09 PM
2

They very much mis-characterize what denying a motion to dismiss means.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/04/20 10:31 PM
26

That's why you don't consent to begin with unless you're 100%. E.g. if you have drugs in the house, fight like hell to deny consent to search your house.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/07/16 01:26 AM
-9

Talk about the devil interpreting scripture for his own purposes. Look man, HIV isn't the only bug out there. There are all sorts of STIs or ordinary fungi that can grow under the foreskin no matter how hard you scrub at it. But whatever. I can honestly give a rat's ass if you don't want your little boy circumcised. Just don't pretend that the decision doesn't have health risks of its own, and I won't pretend if I have a son that circumcision doesn't have the possibility of complications, even i…
/r/MensRights28/05/10 07:56 AM
-6

That's really funny because I'm circumcised (and a man).
/r/MensRights28/05/10 07:42 AM
-10

God, don't I know it. I don't understand it, but then I also don't understand creationists or global climate change deniers either. Notice how they came out of the woodwork misinterpreting my use of the word "misogyny." Their immediate reaction was to interpret it as attacking their little anti-circumcision movement, where honestly I couldn't care less if they don't want their boys cut. What my beef was, and still is, was that they compared it to FGM, which is abhorrent.
/r/MensRights28/05/10 07:20 AM
-9

You're putting words in my mouth.
/r/MensRights28/05/10 07:18 AM
-5

Here's the linke to the AAP site. http://www.healthychildren.org/English/ages-stages/prenatal/decisions-to-make/pages/Circumcision.aspx It doesn't make a recommendation against circumcision, which is what you seem to be implying. It just tells parents to weigh their options. And I never called it misogyny to be for the banning of male circumcision. I've stated again and again though, comparing male circumcision, which has a valid, health related purpose, against FGM, is misogyny.
/r/MensRights28/05/10 07:14 AM
-6

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=circumcision-penis-microbiome-hiv-infection http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/factsheets/circumcision.htm Male circumcision has been associated with a lower risk for HIV infection in international observational studies and in three randomized controlled clinical trials. It is possible, but not yet adequately assessed, that male circumcision could reduce male-to-female transmission of HIV, although probably to a lesser extent than female-to-male tra…
/r/MensRights28/05/10 07:07 AM
-11

Oh please. I did nothing of the sort. Now comparing male circumcision, which has health benefits beyond the ritualistic and which have been demonstrated by the scientific community again and again, to ritualistic FGM, which has none, now that's illogical misogyny. You're either so wound up looking for man-hating where man-hating doesn't exist (I'm a dude btw) that your brain's short-circuited whenever someone posts something contrary to the headline in this forum, or you're functionally illitera…
/r/MensRights28/05/10 04:48 AM
-10

No. But that's an incredible reading deficiency you have there.
/r/MensRights28/05/10 04:36 AM
-11

I understand we're talking about Australian law here, but unfortunately we're also talking about a relatively small, uninformed world. Setting aside for a second the argument about male circumcision (and you have to understand that it sounds from your post that you're advocating both for the "ritual nick" for females and against traditional male circumcision, even if you're just refuting my points), any move for any sort of ritual female genital mutilation, even if it's one with minimal scarring…
/r/MensRights28/05/10 04:35 AM
-22

Your argument is absolutely retarded. Male circumcision is done for the health of the baby. Jewish law may be outmoded in today's world, but in the ancient times it was absolutely progressive in recognizing things that make people sick (e.g. unclean animals, improper cutlery sanitization, promiscuity) and banning the practices as "offensive to God." One of these banned practices is allowing males to keep foreskin. Even today, foreskin is a breeding ground for fungus and other infections, includi…
/r/MensRights28/05/10 04:11 AM
21

Also, if you want to be happy the rest of your life, never make a pretty woman your wife.
/r/MensRights22/05/10 09:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter