TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dasbush Archive

View 0 posts and 75 comments by dasbush on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

So git includes as lines of codes renaming files - as in every single line in the file is counted twice when you rename it, removing the line and adding the line in the new file. A big refactor could way over-inflate his lines of code. We would need to look at the actual commits, but this 850k number is probably waaaaay off. Edit: someone else is saying that the data also counts as lines. Let's say they have an SQL file to insert the data into a new database.... easily 850k lines that are meanin…
/r/MensRights11/04/19 11:00 AM
-4

Institutional misandry is probably better than treason... Politics is all about compromise - otherwise you become as tone deaf to reality as pro-lifers. Never be a single issue voter.
/r/MensRights22/11/18 06:26 PM
-6

Man, critical thinking is dropping in /r/mensrights ain't it... Read what the person said, if there was a rape then the accusation is true, regardless of what evidence there is. I think the very definition of a truthful accusation is the fact that the event actually occurred. It's just a question of whether or not others know it to be true or false and how they respond to it.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 07:47 PM
3

Mandating equal access isn't exactly a good idea. Equal access should be the default, but crazy and dangerous people have kids too.
/r/MensRights24/11/17 01:59 PM
1

Because they want to?
/r/MensRights16/03/17 03:02 PM
2

Well, it makes some sense. The store wants to reward people who drive low emission vehicles.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 06:33 AM
22

He went back to the school because "they had to test something". Whether the school was in on it or not we can't say, but there wasn't any reason to think that it was some clever trap.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 09:11 PM
4

I'm a bank teller in Canada, so this specifically applies to Canada. But if you're in the US things should be similar. Basically, she would have to volunteer making you joint on the account. From there, you could put money in the account and see where the money goes. As a matter of course, however, she could simply move the money to another account of hers and do whatever she wants with it without you knowing about where it goes. If she's on board with your plan then it can work. Essentially, sh…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 06:20 AM
3

Or there's a consistent lack of evidence to convict real rapists. Just for completeness.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 08:11 PM
3

For what it's worth, the National Post leans right.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 07:09 AM
6

Haha, sorry. Disagree with actor: booooo Agree with actor: hooraaaay!
/r/MensRights26/03/15 01:02 AM
2

Without trying to be disparaging to you and your comment, it's so easy to say "who gives a crap about what actor/actress says?" when you disagree and then to hail them as a hero when you do agree with them.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 12:59 AM
8

but I'd argue it doesn't happen as often as older men praying on that vulnerability. Have you, uh, you know, ever talked to a young male teacher in your life?
/r/MensRights23/07/14 11:07 PM
3

What it's called doesn't really matter. Hobby Lobby (and a significant number of pro-life people) holds that preventing implantation is of sufficiently similar kin to abortion that such an action is immoral. There is a miscommunication of ideas with the word "abortifacient" - but once that is cleared up it is clear that the idea behind the term is what is important to the argument. It's just a definitional problem, not a problem with the argument - which isn't to say that there are no problems w…
/r/MensRights01/07/14 07:38 PM
22

Precise reading comprehension isn't exactly a skill many people have.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 04:36 PM
14

Editorialized headline. For evidence, I present the following line: In all three cases, the investigation found, on the balance of probabilities, that the presumption of innocence favours Kenny. This means that those claiming harassment will likely not be able to prove their claim. This does not mean that the claim was "made up" or "fabricated". This is exactly the kind of faulty reasoning that MRAs are accused of when saying that making a false rape accusation should be criminal. Failure to pro…
/r/MensRights02/04/14 04:12 PM
3

Oh boy. I'm leaving it. I deserve all the shit I get.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 07:34 PM
-2

Using "they" is grammatically incorrect. I know it's silly and that using "they" as a singular neuter pronoun is becoming more and more common and accepted, but we would be remiss if we didn't acknowledge that there is good grammatical and stylistic reasons for just picking a pronoun.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 07:19 PM
17

What the hell does leaving campus for lunch have to do with a bomb threat? Plant a bomb and leave at lunch when no-one will notice. Like on an airline if your luggage gets on a plane and you don't they will find your luggage and get it off the plane before takeoff. That's the rationale for this cockamamie scheme.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 06:33 PM
20

Oh man that makes way more sense. I thought they couldn't go to the campus!
/r/MensRights15/10/13 06:32 PM
5

Just hang in there and do what makes you happy. Ad te. Will marrying this girl make you happy? Or rather since happiness shouldn't be contingent upon a woman, will it aide in your happiness? If you're worried about that, that's a flag. As soon as trust is broken in a relationship, it is almost impossible to get it back without some severe commitment from both sides. Sounds like your trust in her is shaken, are you both willing to make that severe commitment to refound that trust? For a girl you …
/r/TheRedPill02/10/13 04:32 PM
3

It's too bad that Colbert has to keep it funny because he interrupted her whenever she was about to get to something interesting.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/13 05:37 PM
3

With you my man. Everyone is telling this guy that he needs to convince her to have an abortion - get out of jail free card. What he needs to do is what /r/theredpill tells women to do all the fucking time - act with some damn responsibility. Don't want to get saddled with some step-above trailer trash's kid? Don't fuck her. That simple. But he did fuck her and now he is the one getting fucked. It's his own fault, he should deal with the consequences.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/13 06:50 AM
1

I think that bar bar misused the term Marxist Feminism/Feminist Marxism. You've adequately described that, but he seemed to be using it in more of a Cultural Marxism sense.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/13 04:17 PM
3

You are a dirty slut whore. You cant hamster your way out of that [+92] dafuq? Went through the comment history of /u/jardogkid and not a single post in /r/theredpill. Interesting. permalink to comment.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/13 08:01 PM
6

Hell, even the Catholics allow it! I was going to say.... to bring up some canon law: Can. 1142 For a just cause, the Roman Pontiff can dissolve a non-consummated marriage between baptized persons or between a baptized party and a non-baptized party at the request of both parties or of one of them, even if the other party is unwilling. Going to the Pope is a big deal, but it is certainly, in principle, possible. Also, if we're talking about a Catholic marriage, if she had no intention of consumm…
/r/TheRedPill31/08/13 12:03 AM
2

To be fair, this story did get a fair deal of coverage, perhaps national. CBC is the public broadcaster in Canada.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 03:49 AM
17

Well, this line was just dropped at the 15:40 mark: I'm not going to snatch you out of the car bald-headed because I firmly believe that Caleb (the Father) would shoot me. Oh man, best line so far is at 31:40 Mom: If he wants extra time then he needs to go through the courts Son: Then let's go to court Mom: That's not your decision Son: So it's my.... [Flabbergasted expression] Oh, here's a nice flat out lie at 33:30 Context: After the father stating unequivocally that the son is free to do what…
/r/MensRights09/08/13 02:55 AM
15

she has already caused enough heartache for herself she...herself ಠ_ಠ Quit the victim blaming.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 03:37 AM
17

is not just acquitted but held up as an example of justice. Slight correction: The Supreme Court overturned her acquittal. But they waived any jail time because of stresses due to the trial and alleged abuse, etc. "She had already been through enough" was the reasoning, more or less. So while she is still guilty, she isn't brought to justice.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 03:30 AM
2

The use of universals quantifiers is usually a dead give-away of intellectual incompetence.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 01:07 AM
1

I said earlier that bullshitting on reddit is a lot different than being in a university where the professor himself is doing the insulting. Professors teach a subject and should attempt to remain unbiased in their approach. I think that is fairly measured. Hell, you didn't answer my question. Should the free speech of feminists who shout down any who are opposed to them be limited so that the other side can enter the discussion? They're free to yell and cackle all they want. Yet surely, in a un…
/r/TheRedPill14/04/13 09:30 PM
1

The purpose of a university is to exchange ideas. Not to insult the ideas of others. I don't think it should be illegal for a professor to insult another group in class. But I do think that the university has a responsibility to uphold decorum. How about this: Should one group in a university be allowed to shout down another simply because they disagree? They are speaking, and if you value freedom of speech then they aren't doing anything wrong.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/13 08:53 PM
1

alright. respect feminism. that includes dont make jokes about feminism, dont create any satire, dont hurt anybodies feelings. Respecting an idea in a university setting is a lot different than bullshitting about on reddit. Surely you agree that a professor, in class, should not take pot-shots at someone's beliefs. Criticise the belief, absolutely. But making jokes out of it in class is unacceptable. For instance: in a biology class teaching about evolution. It is unreasonable for the professor …
/r/TheRedPill14/04/13 03:49 PM
1

"Requiring 'professionals' to respect our faith" is a lot different than "excluding it from questioning and criticism." To me, the gulf is so enormous that I find it dubious that you've conflated them. Why is it that respecting an idea (or the person with the idea) is equivalent to not subjecting the idea to criticism?
/r/TheRedPill14/04/13 03:31 PM
1

For what it's worth, buddy of mine was in the Canadian army about 15 years ago said it was true. Not the lights, but the wives sleeping around.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/13 03:02 AM
2

Exactly, look at the two examples he gives at about 4:40. The first: Feminism claims that it caused legal-gender equality, giving women the opportunity to work. The guy states that industrialization is an alternative cause leading to a natural gender equality, since the physical demands of work is lowered by machines . But without contraception, the women wouldn't be able to work in the first place because they would be pregnant, as you have pointed out. The second: Women don't show long term co…
/r/TheRedPill12/02/13 12:47 AM
20

OPs ploy worked perfectly.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 03:04 AM
0

Do you have any studies to bolster that claim?
/r/MensRights15/01/13 04:59 PM
1

Do you have any studies to bolster that claim?
/r/MensRights15/01/13 04:59 PM
8

he's also saying that it matters if they were his or not and that his love was conditional. It didn't say anywhere that he wouldn't continue to love them, on my reading. The mother poisoned their minds against him, plain and simple. The mother, who is a manipulator and liar, had sole custody. He didn't stand a chance in their minds.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 06:32 PM
1

What I mean about the NSF fees not to OP is that the NSF fees will go through the account, which he is responsible for. But given the circumstances, I highly suspect that the bank will realize that there are some probably illegal actions going on and reverse those fees. It depends on US Law. OP said that she was using her marriage certificate to cash the cheques, which reeks to me. I know that I wouldn't take that cheque, but things might be different down there. If OP closed the account and tol…
/r/MensRights12/01/13 10:46 PM
1

NSF fees are charged to the account. If she can sign the cheques, then she is joint on the account of has power of attourney, in which case she has every right to the funds in the account. If she doesn't, then this is fraud. Well, I don't know how the US works, but this is for Canada.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 10:27 PM
3

To Kill a Mockingbird makes a similar point, though the [probably] false rape accusation is used to make a larger point.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 06:47 AM
42

The point is in the contrasting result from the legal system. Though it would be interesting to see how the laws between Illinois 8 years ago and Nova Scotia today stack up in this issue.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 04:38 AM
1

No no no. My point is only that the drunk sex/rape issue is complicated. I guess I should say that I am not disagreeing with you, but making a larger point and your post happened to be the spur of inspiration. If someone is falling over drunk and then someone else asks for his wallet and the drunk guy sort of grumbles, well, there's no question. Further, I was responding to the specific line quoted - "its the alcohol that the drunk person has had that's the problem and not the predatory behaviou…
/r/MensRights30/12/12 05:36 PM
1

its the alcohol that the drunk person has had that's the problem and not the predatory behaviour. Without speaking to the rightness or wrongness of either side here, I would like to point out that alcohol seems to only factor into one's culpability for an action in the case of sex. An example: Drunk guy walks up to sober guy and says, "Hey man, take my wallet" Sober: "Why would I take your wallet, you drunk fool." Drunk: "Just take the damn wallet" Sober: "Okay" Takes wallet Drunk guy next morni…
/r/MensRights30/12/12 04:52 PM
1

You got for CCW for that?
/r/MensRights23/12/12 05:01 AM
6

It was "The Talk" not "The View." I hate to be that guy....
/r/MensRights20/11/12 04:05 AM
9

"I never thought I would be able to go through with it," Welp, pre-meditated.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 04:02 AM
15

Only for good behaviour.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 01:17 PM
17

It's almost like the HR department needs to justify its existence...
/r/MensRights17/11/12 02:08 AM
1

I didn't say I believed otherwise. In fact, I am still formulating my opinion. Hence the question: but is the degree of reduction similar enough to warrant comparison? I am not trying to argue against the status quo position of this subreddit. Such is generally an exercise in futility. I am asking for reasons as to why this comparison is so often made. Cutting off a girl's clitoris is not comparable to cutting off a boy's foreskin, for instance. But I am too ignorant of the facts to know what is…
/r/MensRights12/11/12 05:31 PM
-1

Reduces sensation/pleasure during sex I don't think there is an argument to say that this isn't true as stated. I merely question that the degree of reduction of sensation for each procedure is a fair comparison. For instance, both getting a burn on my finger and cutting my finger off "reduce the sensation" of my finger. But obviously one is worse than the other. So too, both male and female circumcision reduce sensation, but is the degree of reduction similar enough to warrant comparison?
/r/MensRights11/11/12 03:10 AM
3

From the second page: Perjury charge Whereas the legal proceedings could be nearing an end for Jonathan Montgomery, they are beginning anew for Elizabeth Paige Coast. At Friday's hearing, Bell said that Coast would be arrested after the hearing and charged with perjury. Police arrested Coast — who has worked as a civilian employee at the Hampton Police Department for the past four years — at 10:30 a.m., said police spokesman Sgt. Jason Price. She had been placed on leave without pay on Nov. 2, a…
/r/MensRights10/11/12 09:09 PM
1

It says "crown ward" later on so I'm assuming this is in Canada. If that is the case, then he would file a human rights complaint. The human rights tribunal in Canada is an absurdity in itself, but they have to investigate all cases and in a case where discrimination is suspected they will hold a tribunal. In such a tribunal, all costs to the "plaintiff" are covered by the government and all costs of the "defendant" are covered by the defendant. In other words, you can't lose filing a complaint …
/r/MensRights31/10/12 09:30 PM
2

Voting for Barack Obama is what ends puberty. Makes sense.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 12:21 AM
0

New Phrase: Blue Knights.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 06:53 PM
4

Those who are concerned about the pay gap, on the other hand, argue that it is an unfair consequence of our gender system (Why don't we expect men to take on childcare responsibilities? Why do we think that women who aren't willing to put their children and families first are selfish? Why do we have a system that makes it so hard for both men and women to balance career and family and share responsibility for caring?). They also suggest that there is still some degree of discrimination, more sub…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 03:40 AM
2

Well, I would argue that the average baptized Catholic isn't really in Communion with the Catholic Church. So what do you mean by "average first-world Catholic." If just any baptized person, not a hell of a lot - sure. People actually in Communion with the Church? Quite a bit, especially since being in Communion with the Catholic Church is predicated upon agreeing with the it on quite a few of those controversial issues.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 11:11 PM
3

This isn't really "the Catholic perspective." It is Fr. DeSouza's perspective and he happens to be a member of the Catholic clergy. Hence, a Catholic such as myself is more than free to disagree with him on this issue.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 10:20 PM
16

I think it would be a good idea from here on out to use sockpuppets as mods. With a little extra effort in keeping one's post history clean, one can't be threatened in the first place.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 12:27 AM
1

I don't think that we have to expect something in return to do nice things in general. I mean, an act isn't selfless if I expect reciprocation. But that said, I agree - if a woman (or anyone for that matter) demands selfless acts on my part then that person isn't worth the effort. I think the point is that gifts are freely given not because the person deserves it, but because I think it is good. An example is giving someone in the hospital flowers. It isn't because they deserve the flowers that …
/r/MensRights30/07/12 06:44 PM
2

This is a very true point. I wont say that I've got it figured out - and I might be a bit idealistic. But let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater either. An anecdote: I know this guy who, if you sat him down with almost anyone then they will call him a misogynist. I mean, this guy is hardcore - refuses to take orders from a woman at work, hates women in the military (quit the military partly because of it), that sort of stuff. But at the same time, he is the most chivalrous motherfucker …
/r/MensRights30/07/12 03:20 AM
14

You know, I understand that most people think that chivalry is just being used by women to make men their bitch. And I don't disagree with that. But I think that it is a misappropriation of chivalry, rather than its nature. I also realize that what I am about to say will likely be unpopular. I think that us men want to show women (neglecting homosexuals for the present moment) our masculinity - in the present example, giving up his seat. I don't have a problem with this. I take a great deal of s…
/r/MensRights30/07/12 12:25 AM
1

I just figured out Magic Mike.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 06:55 PM
5

I think that was the author's very point.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 01:44 AM
2

Check out Boys Adrift while you're at it.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 01:32 AM
8

I think the author made it more about sex than the original asker intended, and for good reason - to get his point across easily. I expressed my extreme displeasure with this since they are doing tons of stuff I would love to do there with her. This statement indicates that the questioner is not really concerned about sex, but about the relationship in general. Maybe they don't go on dates and he feels that she is neglecting him, or maybe he just wants to spend time with her, but she wants to sp…
/r/MensRights20/07/12 01:30 AM
2

Probably the main reason why a woman/man getting upvoted to the top in /r/mr and /r/2xc, respectively, for posting positive things about that subreddits goals has to do with the idea that someone from outside of the standard membership and inside the standard membership of the opposition carries weight rather than some kind of bias (positive or negative) in the group itself toward members of a specific sex. In other words, I don't think that women getting upvoted in /r/mr for posting something p…
/r/MensRights29/05/12 07:21 AM
1

My brother is an actuary working in health insurance. He talks about death differently now...
/r/MensRights26/05/12 10:38 PM
0

I am a Catholic, and am constrained by them. I just wanted to point that out since it might have been unclear.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 07:13 PM
0

As a prescription medication or device, especially that is sometimes used for non-contraceptive purposes In these cases, contraceptives are permitted by the Catholic Church since their intended use is not contraception, but medicine. It gets a little hairy when a married couple wants to have sex while using these, but that's another issue. to avoid life-threatening pregnancy, This, on the other hand, the Catholic Church would not allow. Just so you know.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 02:19 PM
4

That's the most clever part about it. From a rhetorical standpoint, this article was really well written.
/r/MensRights26/03/12 12:50 PM
9

Women did testify, just later. Source. Obvious editorial bias should be noted, but the fact remains that women did testify. The reason that the specific woman was prevented from testifying is because she was going to talk about the need for contraception and not religious freedom, which is what the commission was called for.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 11:22 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter