TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dawn_of_thyme Archive

View 0 posts and 49 comments by dawn_of_thyme on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

No it's the Harvey Weinstein bullshit all over again. Losing opportunity without providing sexual favors
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/20 01:46 PM
0

You just said you are ignoring facts though?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/20 01:45 PM
1

Why do you assume there's a false accuser here?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/20 01:44 PM
1

Nope
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/20 04:20 AM
1

Sounds like you're projecting
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/20 04:04 AM
1

As to my point earlier, there's a difference between innocent and innocent in the eyes of the law.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/20 03:54 AM
-1

Okay. So you believe when she said she wasn't raped under oath, but you don't believe when she said she was raped under oath?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/20 03:43 AM
-1

Yeah she was coerced into saying that. You can believe that theres no judicial evidence and believe what a woman says at the same time. Those aren't contradictory statements.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/20 03:30 AM
1

Or is your point that despite subjective evidence, a guilty man was named innocent?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/20 03:25 AM
0

Your point is that despite evidence presence, a guilty man can be proven innocent.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/20 03:25 AM
0

Thats a hysterical comparison, considering the evidence present and the conviction.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/20 03:21 AM
-4

I don't want it to be anything. There isn't proof about what happened that occasion. Rape or not. I'm not going to assume rape didn't happen or did.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/20 02:56 AM
-5

No that's the assumption of people salivating to hate on rape victims
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/20 02:44 AM
0

Which she said was forced?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/20 02:34 AM
-1

Doesn't mean she's lying
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/20 02:33 AM
-5

Or the truth
/r/PussyPassDenied21/02/20 02:33 AM
-1

I think I got banned for saying cops that act outside of the law need to be punished properly.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/20 03:15 PM
-5

Not false at all. You've never said anything contrarian in a conservative sub then
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/20 03:03 PM
-10

Yeah no, they ban for much less than being inflammatory
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/20 02:50 PM
-18

Probably because the conservative subs ban everyone
/r/PussyPassDenied10/02/20 01:54 PM
1

Neither spelt anything
/r/PussyPassDenied22/11/19 03:31 PM
2

But does it belong in this sub?
/r/PussyPassDenied22/11/19 03:30 PM
3

Good thing its a fake meme
/r/PussyPassDenied22/11/19 03:29 PM
0

Eh
/r/PussyPassDenied16/11/19 03:23 PM
1

It would probably also get auto banned in mgtow
/r/PussyPassDenied17/08/19 01:23 PM
0

Feminist here. Am man
/r/PussyPassDenied17/08/19 01:21 PM
2

Yikes
/r/MensRights04/06/19 01:51 PM
1

Islam is a religion, I hold most of those with skepticism. At the end of the day our constitution protects people's rights to have faith. The real issue starts when people start aligning their religious influence in a way that takes away rights from others.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 01:37 PM
1

Yikes
/r/MensRights04/06/19 12:20 PM
1

Only time will tell
/r/MensRights13/05/19 12:53 PM
-4

Dying organization makes move to stay relevant *
/r/MensRights13/05/19 05:05 AM
1

This is an odd post here. You sure this rule wasn't put into place by men? And enforced by men? I can't think of any actual instance in our lifetime where women were taking advantage of something like this.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/19 07:29 AM
4

Equality
/r/PussyPass30/12/18 02:18 PM
0

Yeah. Sounds more like dumb men here than exploitive women
/r/PussyPass30/12/18 02:17 PM
1

Sure. And hair makes the head more interesting
/r/PussyPassDenied09/12/18 05:30 AM
1

Yeah, the top of people heads is a little less interesting than their face
/r/PussyPassDenied08/12/18 09:55 PM
-1

No it's not lol
/r/PussyPassDenied08/12/18 05:16 PM
6

No. If a woman doesn't see your face your face pre beard, they don't know what you look like
/r/PussyPassDenied08/12/18 04:47 PM
35

They're both right?
/r/PussyPassDenied08/12/18 03:19 PM
-3

lol
/r/MensRights05/12/18 02:00 PM
2

Stuff like this is the cheapest solution to inequality issues in this country that stem from race, gender, or sexual orientation issues that have dated back centuries. Much cheaper than cultural reform and education reform.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 12:45 PM
-1

Its not. Zero male circumsicions are done to control a man's sexual pleasure. Almost all female genital mutilations (by volume) are meant to destroy a females ability to feel pleasure during sex.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:48 AM
2

Men can still have pleasure. Women cannot.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:35 AM
-3

No. Men are still capable of sexual pleasure after a circumsicion. Women are not capable of sexual pleasure after female genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:12 AM
1

Men don't lose sexual gratification after a circumsicion. Women do.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 03:01 AM
-1

Again, women don't make the choice to circumsize babies. Parents do. I don't see male circumcisions as a negative on the same plane as female genital mutilalation, but I also support the idea of banning the practice on infants.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:58 AM
1

At least some of those are sexual organs. So no
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:50 AM
-2

And it's not the same as male circumcisions
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:49 AM
-2

Women seem like a straw man in this comic. This a logical leap here connecting consent to sex with a women and only women calling for circumcisions
/r/MensRights04/09/18 02:47 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter