TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

dawsincreek Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by dawsincreek on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

This is interesting but strange. The article separates wealthy men vs poor men, but I assumed late bloomers were already near or at the same income as mid-upper income at least. And If two or more women share 1 guy, then there's gotta be a bunch of divorced single mothers in the crowd that would rather raise their kid alone? I really didn't expect this to be the case considering how many people on this sub say they wouldn't date a single parent who are normally at the bottom of the totem pole. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/21 03:55 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/datingoverthirty/comments/kxok9c/im_a_walking_red_flag_they_dont_believe_im_40/ check the downvotes/upvotes on the comments saying its a red flag/dealbreakers for late bloomers. not the best sample size but its something
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/21 05:03 PM
5

i.e, the dating pool of divorced/separated 30s that get thrown back into the same batch as the "leftovers"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/21 06:20 AM
10

Would women rather date a late-bloomer over a single father? If they don't, then they have to wait for a divorced HVM, but that's unlikely, isn't it? On another sub, I've seen women say they wouldn't ever date guys with no exp, but it's not like there's many other better choices too for that age bracket in the "after market." Especially since people are less likely to switch partners at 30-40 range if they want kids and a house. I think if I were a woman, i'd rather take a chance on a late bloom…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/21 11:12 PM
2

oh thanks for clarifyin. GL :)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/21 10:18 AM
1

im not sure what youre implying between the lines when you mentioned that youre muslim. is it because you cant do casual sex, so you can only get it via marriage?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/21 09:58 AM
1

premarriage survey i think, small scale maybe? men hesitant to marry wasnt their only conclusion, mightve also included womens choice in dating when her status goes up, wasnt a buzzfeed article but from one of those academic websites
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/21 05:41 PM
2

Anyone have that link to the study that shows that men are less likely or are more hesitant to marry a woman who outearns him?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/21 10:58 AM
2

When I first learned of RP I was pretty convinced. I think this sub is nice to show how BP culture/ideas are still relevant and not everything BP/mainstream is invalidated. Or that RP isn't so accurate or successful as it seems on TRP/askTRP. Anyone know the ratio of men/women on this sub?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/21 08:19 PM
1

thank you this is something interesting to think about. i also wasn't sure whether there was an answer to my question even if I did ask you for one. And I'm honestly not sure whether there's more low value men compared to women, but I cant say for sure since the RP is still hazy to me
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 03:47 AM
5

thin hair
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/20 02:13 AM
1

I like your answer but can you go a step further and explain what those arenas are that men are more disadvantaged in and what cauases it? E.g, you say men aren't getting educated, or men are suiciding more, but what causes it? why aren't they getting as educated as woman? I also doubt men will get help, but I think its hard to pin-point what the specific things are in our culture that puts guys in a worse spot compared to women in the 18-30 bracket.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/20 03:48 PM
13

Agreed. They can't have it all, and they don't know the difference between settling vs. making compromises it seems. I lurk another blue pilled, dating group for a younger 18-25 age, and its so sad to see the guys openly market themselves as lonely "simps" while the women call themselves queens even if they're overweight or average looking. It just reinforces the belief that the average guy has no chance with the average girl because she thinks she can be super picky. But in reality, there is no…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/20 07:41 AM
37

i notice this too with women on that sub, a lot of the advice that the people parrot to each other are things like: "girls shouldnt ever settle, its okay to have standards", "its better to be happy single than miserable and divorced" "attraction cant be negotiated, he's either a hard fuck yes, or a hell no." But if the women genuinely takes that advice, they're likely not going to pursue the average guys that make the bulk of their options. instead, you get threads titled: "totally compatible, b…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/20 11:50 PM
2

i tend to see this as women knowing that hot guys are more likely to be unfaithful and they would feel more insecure/uncomfortable for being the uglier one in the relationship if he has too many options. i doubt these women are dating hideous betas either, more like something in between where the guy has a compatible personality and he's decently attractive to her.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/20 07:04 PM
1

If most women don't want to share a high SMV guy, would they still choose that option rather than owning a beta like RP says if they only had these two choices? Or do you think they'd rather be alone? I'm just talking about hypotheticals here since this is super unlikely that any woman would find herself in this situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/20 04:00 PM
3

I'd agree with u, this type of situation seems uncommon so it probably isn't mentioned in their boundaries beforehand, but I think most people would consider this innapropriate. either way, it's the woman's reaction to having another man's hands on her ass which can be problematic. if the girl genuinely didn't think it was wrong cause of culture differences, then it is more pardonable
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/19 06:35 PM
1

what the fuck are those comments? seriously. i found those more shocking than the actual post itself. "your past does not affect your present or future, if you mention it, it cannot be used against you" yea sure, just dont expect OP's future bf to stick with her after knowing that she got railed by literally a hundred cocks before him. "some people do care about this. you should not care about those people" good luck finding them. you have a better chance at winning the lottery.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/05/19 07:37 AM
8

thanks for the analysis kolo, this one seemed benign to me
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/05/19 03:49 AM
10

wait how is this one waatgm?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/05/19 01:14 AM
1

check this persons history.. OP is actually the "ex" in this story and shes impersonating herself as her ex's new gf. shes trying to get her ex-bf away from his new gf so that she can date him again
/r/RedPillWomen05/05/19 12:38 PM
3

she sounds fun
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/05/19 11:04 PM
2

makes sense thanks :)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/19 12:46 AM
1

hey i rly like this answer thx for sharing
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/19 11:46 PM
2

Why do some women stay with their deadbeat boyfriends for yrs then? are they just being tricked into carrying most of the weight?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/19 11:40 PM
4

oh thanks, didnt read it carefully enough to see that she was toying with both of them at the same time.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/04/19 09:50 PM
0

im new here, is it possible that she was just oblivious to being pumped and dumped here? maybe she really thought she was in a relationship? or am i giving her too much benefit of the doubt? or i guess shes wrong for giving out sex before commitment?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/04/19 09:30 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter