db2 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
0	UN HIV Circumcision Study: A Fraud? sigh It's like talking to a petulant child. I give up.	/r/MensRights	19/05/09 07:57 PM
1	Duped dad wins custody of boy in historic Family Court decision I think you missed the point.	/r/MensRights	19/05/09 03:44 AM
0	UN HIV Circumcision Study: A Fraud? yet no women clean under there Umm, yes they do... usually whenever they take a shower. We're back to making shit up I see. :/	/r/MensRights	19/05/09 01:03 AM
1	UN HIV Circumcision Study: A Fraud? I'm a victim of male genital mutilation too. They carved off so much tissue from my dick, I have trouble reaching orgasm, and I don't feel jack-didly-shit through a condom. I wish you'd have stated that right away in that other thread. It sheds some light on the mindset behind what you're saying, and you've got every right to be angry. I would however point out that the anger is misaimed. Your issue is with the doctor, or by extension hospital, who did the procedure. (insert religious names inst…	/r/MensRights	18/05/09 11:24 PM
-2	UN HIV Circumcision Study: A Fraud? You're not interested in a discussion, you're interested in perpetuating bullshit. Why exactly should I waste my time? You asked me to "calm down" yet you've no idea if I'm clam or not. All you can see is black and white text on a screen. But I'm sure it made you feel better to imagine that I was frothing at the mouth as I knuckle-bashed my keyboard in my replies to you didn't it? Grow up. You can learn from what I've informed you about or you can continue being an ignorant jackass spreading hal…	/r/MensRights	17/05/09 08:06 PM
-1	UN HIV Circumcision Study: A Fraud? First, all above the line is moralistic bullshit. Take your pseudoreligion and stick it. Second, the "older women" who do that are usually the mothers in societies in which this happens. Reasons why the mother would do that to her child after having had to endure it herself as a teenager vary. Regardless it is their religion which prescribes the practice and who does it. Third, you're just making shit up about men being the ones who circumcise the boys. It may be true in certain cultures but not…	/r/MensRights	17/05/09 06:55 AM
-4	UN HIV Circumcision Study: A Fraud? And second?	/r/MensRights	17/05/09 06:29 AM
-4	UN HIV Circumcision Study: A Fraud? and women? Female circumcision is the removal of the clitoris. It is not the same thing at all. As for the rest, I contend that commenters like you are leveraging it as a way to attack people. It's not about circumcisions, it's not about the pros or cons of either having one or not having one, it's about people like you finding a way to attack other people, plain and simple. It's fucking pathetic.	/r/MensRights	16/05/09 03:54 AM
-2	It is generally accepted that infants feel pain as much or more than do older children and adults. It took a public outcry to end open-heart surgery on infants without anesthetic. Yet circumcisions continue without pain relief. You cite as example a 25 year old who presumably has gone through puberty and all the physical changes that entails. I will not debate with the intellectually dishonest. Good day.	/r/MensRights	13/05/09 02:29 AM
-2	It is generally accepted that infants feel pain as much or more than do older children and adults. It took a public outcry to end open-heart surgery on infants without anesthetic. Yet circumcisions continue without pain relief. Yet circumcisions continue without pain relief. Bullshit. If you're going to bitch about something that has no effect on you at least get your facts straight. They use a local anesthetic. The dishonesty of this is disgusting. Comparing male circumcisions to female ones is another dishonesty - for female circumcisions they remove the clitoris entirely which is not the same thing unless you ignore biology entirely. Another outright lie is the claim that being clipped somehow makes you less or more…	/r/MensRights	12/05/09 04:19 AM
2	A rather depressing Rolling Stone article about a man whose life has been defined by his abnormally large penis, including being molested by an 18-year-old woman when he was ten due to a friend's bragging about the impressive size of said man's reproductive organ. No, credit for being secure enough to be honest. Big difference.	/r/MensRights	09/05/09 09:48 PM
2	A rather depressing Rolling Stone article about a man whose life has been defined by his abnormally large penis, including being molested by an 18-year-old woman when he was ten due to a friend's bragging about the impressive size of said man's reproductive organ. I'm upvoting you for having the nuts to admit that with no shame. I'm above, though nothing even remotely like the (adult) guy in the submission. I get why penis size is such a large part of the male psyche but at the same time I don't get why it has to be, you know?	/r/MensRights	09/05/09 06:21 PM
0	Why is the "MISANDRY" subreddit banned while "MISOGYNY" is not? I was all ready to get quite annoyed by this, then I read the comments. It's a private subreddit. That's how reddit works, someone just beat you to the punch on that one. Suck it up. You want to be a man, be a fucking man. There's an open reddit for women who hate men, yet crave penis. The opposite reddit was made private by the person who got there first. It's as simple as that.	/r/MensRights	09/05/09 06:07 PM