TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

deadEnd3r Archive

View 0 posts and 74 comments by deadEnd3r on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Thank you? Well, now I feel self-conscious.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 09:14 PM
0

Are you fucking kidding me? I was trolling but now I just feel sad for you.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 08:52 PM
-2

Err, no, you really didn't. Are you trolling or just retarded?
/r/MensRights20/07/11 08:42 PM
-1

You don't have an argument then. I think it's you who's bad at math here, in fact data from Switzerland and Scandinavian countries proves you wrong.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 08:31 PM
-2

Because I was willing to give you both sides of the debate. You did the exact opposite of that. Well, the extremes are hardly to be taken as a factor if we're generalizing. Not to mention that there are extremes in both directions; there are more mentally challenged men than there are mentally challenged women. White men, possibly, Black men, not really as their average is around 85 (US) so there's no possible way there can be more of them than Asian women in the 99th p.I.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 07:56 PM
0

Hm.. I'm confused as to why you would mention only one set of references that support your view and fail to mention that in the same article there are opposing references and that the conclusion is that there is little difference. As to data being all over, forgive me for not taking your word for it, as a scientist I'm used to being provided with citations and some sort of evidence when someone presents a theory. There is also the matter of race, Asians are more intelligent than Whites, and Blac…
/r/MensRights20/07/11 06:30 PM
1

Seems about right, on what data do you base these conclusions?
/r/MensRights20/07/11 06:01 PM
0

As I said, citations, please?
/r/MensRights20/07/11 10:18 AM
0

You speak of science but you haven't backed up your claims with a single citation.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 09:47 AM
-2

It makes perfect sense. I have a male brain in a female body, they get along great, therefore, you argument is invalid.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 06:22 PM
-2

My brain is morphologically male and I don't feel the need to actually be male, I'm fine with my body.. maybe because my male brain likes my female boobies.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 06:12 PM
-1

Nice Ad Hominem you got there, just because I'm a troll everything I say is invalidated?
/r/MensRights19/07/11 04:30 PM
-1

huh?
/r/MensRights19/07/11 03:51 PM
-2

I dunno, probably the same as suicide rates among people like you not so long ago while you were considered to be delusional freaks. Nice to see you perpetuating oppression you guys went trough now that you've found religion in science.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 02:53 PM
-1

Really? This seems pretty intense and powerful to me. I hate giving him as an example because he's quite embarrassing, but still... Maybe I was a tiger in a past life and my electromagnetic field's buffer wasn't cleared before attaching to the new body?
/r/MensRights19/07/11 02:38 PM
-1

My point is that you just seem awfully close-minded for someone who demands open-mindedness from others. There was a time when it was impossible to do SRS and hormonal therapy, things change. Not to mention that the concepts of male/female brains and relation to gender and sexuality are far from being an exact science, I have a male brain yet I have no wish to actually be a male. And I'm not saying I can be an actual tiger, more like a tigeresque being.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 01:29 PM
-2

sure, whatever you say.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 12:33 PM
-2

ikr, bro.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 12:22 PM
-2

Should I get a life as well? Seeing how your every sentence is a cliche... And I'm an actual girl, you know, with a uterus and ovaries... and two X chromosomes. No mistaking me for a son, hahaha.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 11:14 AM
-2

Oh, and "I have man bits but wanna wear a dress" is far more original?
/r/MensRights19/07/11 10:36 AM
-1

Well, placebo effect is powerful, what can I say.
/r/MensRights19/07/11 10:18 AM
-1

All species on earth come from one common ancestor, we share about 90% DNA with other mammals. As embryo/fetus develops it even has a tail at one point (I have a tail btw), all that makes it be human instead of any other animal are a few genes. Genetic manipulation is not such a giant leap from hormonal therapy. It's both artificially adding something that is not there naturally. you wouldn't be able to form a coherent sentence if you were a tiger or monkey. Well, if you were a "normal" human fe…
/r/MensRights19/07/11 10:03 AM
-1

except to the extent that alchemy morphed over time into the scientific discipline of chemistry That was my point (except it's not about chemistry but physics in the instance of transmutation). You basically said I'm right.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 09:16 PM
-2

much like alchemy was once considered non-scientific bullshit yet we can transmute elements now. go figure.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 08:51 PM
-3

..as far as you know.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 08:40 PM
-1

Yeah, no one knows for sure but that doesn't stop you from acting as if you do know. Would it make you more inclined to validate my feelings and personal struggle if I said I feel like a monkey instead of a tiger? You're just like the people who don't accept transgendered people, exactly the same as them.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 06:46 PM
-2

Such arrogance, you presume to know what is a mind and how it works when much smarter and educated people who actually work on researching it don't know for sure.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 06:02 PM
-2

I didn't say I have a tiger brain, I said I have a tiger mind.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 05:42 PM
-1

I'm not a furry, it doesn't have anything to do with sexuality, I just feel the need to hunt, eat meat, nap, twitch my tail.. do tiger stuff. Not dress up in suits and fuck..not that there's something wrong with that.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 05:23 PM
-1

At one point people looked at your predicament the same way you're looking at mine now, and science didn't back you up. My mental species doesn't match my body species, the only difference is that we're not technologically advanced enough to artificially align those two. Why are hormonal treatments ok but genetic therapy is not? If I feel like a tiger who are you to say I am not one? I love how hypocritical you are.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 05:13 PM
-3

Not an ass, a tiger.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 04:52 PM
-6

I understand that, I too was struggling with the feeling that this body is wrong for me, and your example gives me hope that one day I too can have my TRUE form, that of a fierce tiger. When I was a kid I always drew stripes on my body but my mother would scold me and wash them off. :(
/r/MensRights18/07/11 04:40 PM
-10

Well, it's not healthy, that's for sure.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 04:04 PM
1

We actually compete with who gets the most downvotes per post.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 03:38 PM
-14

He's a horrible, horrible person, I'm sorry you have to face such hate. It's not your fault you're sick, I'm sure God has a plan for you.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 11:23 AM
2

I told you we don't do the upvote/downvote brigades, that's r/mensrights and the femnists.... we actually prefer downvotes.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 10:42 AM
1

Well, aren't we full of anecdotal evidence! I judge your argument to be near worthless as far as a logic is considered, but appreciate the "feminized by feminists" thingy, it amused me. Overall points: 2/10
/r/MensRights17/07/11 10:12 PM
2

The funny thing is that some women do, and some women don't... and women who can't tell the difference are not worth breeding with anyway.
/r/MensRights17/07/11 02:03 PM
1

Cliffor was a famous troll here, a very naughty bro.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 06:04 PM
2

No he isn't, that was me on the pic he posted... I'm his sister lol
/r/MensRights16/07/11 05:34 PM
2

kloo, I thought we were friends :( You could have given credit to noys for making that, she put in a lot of work in that... of course, that's nowhere near complete...
/r/MensRights16/07/11 05:24 PM
4

Yeah, they're pretty pathetic...fake plastic alphas.
/r/MensRights16/07/11 03:59 PM
1

lol umad?
/r/MensRights12/07/11 08:43 PM
1

But, if your argument stands, we should have seen at least some growth when the number of voters were suddenly increased by a statistically significant amount, right? No, not necessarily. There are plenty of other factors to consider. I was just giving one example, not proposing a complete theory that would explain it. For example, Switzerland's numbers don't support your theories, neither do Nordic countries. But that's not my point, my point is, I'm not from the US, I don't give a fuck about a…
/r/MensRights12/07/11 06:50 PM
0

Except emancipation of the blacks wasn't doubling, as population in 1865. was about 35.2 million and slave population was around 4 million. Any more ineffectual rebuttals?
/r/MensRights12/07/11 05:30 PM
0

If some unknown factor caused both a desire for larger government and women's suffrage, then government should have only grown in states that voluntarily adopted suffrage. That's called Begging the question. Why would it only grow in states that desired it, and not in all those that it was in actual effect? Could it not be affected by the fact that voter base suddenly doubled? Very, very sloppy thinking.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 04:56 PM
0

Of course I did, I didn't find anything but the sort of conjecture one finds in conspiracy theories. Seems to be obvious truth but once you take a good look at it, it all falls apart. Truthiness doesn't hold much sway with me.
/r/MensRights12/07/11 04:32 PM
0

Assess gonna assume. However, the same thing happening to several states, several countries, across several time periods.... that's as strong as proof gets without experimental evidence. It couldn't be that that's just the result of having a lot more people being involved in the workforce and government, and maybe gender having nothing to do with it? Not to mention all of it happened while patriarchy is still in effect. I think you're overextending your extrapolations to the point of meaningless…
/r/MensRights12/07/11 04:16 PM
1

Correlation doesn't imply causation. So, what you're saying is that your conclusions are based on nothing but anecdotal evidence and confirmation bias with no grounds in logic or reality and are just reflecting your personal belief/feelings. Are you a woman by any chance?
/r/MensRights12/07/11 03:50 PM
1

They peaked early but after that they didn't improve much, a bunch of has-beens. I give you low birth rates, but "women influence government to become large"? Seriously? How do you rationalize that one?
/r/MensRights12/07/11 03:22 PM
2

You write some good fiction, bro. Might have added that Arabs wouldn't be anything without oil, they were just lucky. Yellows are good at copying white's technology and there's a lot of them. Social collapse, low birth rates, conquering by an outside nation And that doesn't happen under patriarchy? ...Not sure if trolling...
/r/MensRights12/07/11 02:52 PM
4

Care to elaborate on that? And what are your thoughts on "advanced civilization" being white? when you remove patriarchy from civilization, bad things happen. Like what? War? Hunger? Death by easily preventable disease?
/r/MensRights12/07/11 01:08 PM
0

yaoi pics, plz? <3
/r/MensRights12/07/11 11:21 AM
1

You sure know a lot about stretching penis...so it's not the butthurt that makes you so fucking annoying, it's the penishurt.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 06:33 PM
2

I love it when you get authoritative like that.
/r/MensRights10/07/11 04:31 PM
2

Fair enough, good luck.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 01:24 PM
2

Really? Like we have to accept generalizations such as that men are more aggressive, violent? That men are more likely to be the attacker and women are more likely to be the victim? That women are better mothers? Or do you only accept the generalizations that suit you?
/r/MensRights09/07/11 12:55 PM
2

It really isn't anything like that, it's more like saying that a men's magazine needs a few more pages dedicated to men's interests. No harm in it, but it's kinda redundant.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 12:45 PM
2

This whole site covers the wide scope of men's interests, is what I'm trying to say here.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 12:12 PM
1

I mean, there are already subs that cover all those things, and there are mostly men in there. Not to mention there's r/OneY
/r/MensRights09/07/11 11:44 AM
1

Isn't that like...the entire reddit?
/r/MensRights09/07/11 11:29 AM
1

Sometimes this is due to feminism. Sometimes due to a one night stand. Some times due to a divorce and a bitch of a mother who uses parental alienation. Sometimes it is due to prison or the military or death. Sometimes it's due to the father being an insane drunken irresponsible shithead. FTFY
/r/MensRights09/07/11 11:07 AM
2

ah, it's a meme now?
/r/MensRights06/07/11 03:59 PM
6

I was thinking that she's batshit crazy but the way you put it her bitching actually makes sense.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 01:14 PM
10

I don't think you've ever been in a fight...
/r/MensRights06/07/11 12:29 PM
5

What about guys that support kicking guys in the nuts?
/r/MensRights06/07/11 10:31 AM
0

For you it makes perfect sense because they're not likely to be used by anyone.
/r/MensRights05/07/11 07:23 PM
-49

And you are part of the Rebel Alliance and a traitor!
/r/MensRights04/07/11 04:19 PM
-62

lol are you fucking kidding me? don't be a pussy.
/r/MensRights04/07/11 04:14 PM
1

Fappa fappa.
/r/MensRights16/06/11 09:52 AM
1

Any rottweilers?
/r/MensRights15/06/11 08:58 PM
2

Good sir! I say, this is most improper behavior! You should have slapped the harlot square across the face, she'll never learn otherwise.
/r/MensRights15/06/11 08:55 PM
2

Hot.
/r/MensRights15/06/11 08:52 PM
1

...go on
/r/MensRights09/06/11 02:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter