TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

decaf_puppy Archive

View 2 posts and 23 comments by decaf_puppy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
178

Healthdecaf_puppy/r/MensRights09/05/26 04:27 PM
123

Marriage/Childrendecaf_puppy/r/MensRights10/12/25 12:00 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
28

It’s like hiring. We only want experienced people. Juniors have to make up employment to get hired.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 03:38 PM

Honestly if a woman is looking for me to pay I have already classified it as a transaction. Some women split and I generally find them less selfish and more relationship material. I honestly didn’t start like this, just learnt from experience. If someone thinks they are better than me and expect me to cater to them , I don’t owe them niceness. For those I generally make up by brining some dessert I made myself etc. I usually end up eating it alone on the way home though.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 09:49 PM
10

When women talk about low effort men on apps, I give them a simple challenge: set up a profile as a guy and get 10 matches. Then you can criticise them. Two of them actually did and a few weeks later said you men do have it hard and we get why the early efforts are so less effort. Most don’t care though.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 11:56 PM
0

I mean blue pill means be like the brainless masses and red pill means facing the harsh truth no matter the consequences, so ….. no pill is going to change the reality that the odds are stacked against average men.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 04:06 PM
6

That is a circular way of saying the man pays as men are supposed to ask women out by default.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 04:29 AM
10

It’s always the guys fault isn’t it? My point is that both sides got to lie.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 12:26 AM
1

I am sure it would inconvenience you but we don’t owe you anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 12:24 AM
3

Oh these are all well employed women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/26 12:23 AM
8

I mean enough have lied to get a free meal.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 10:04 PM

The one on the skewed side naturally would prefer that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 09:53 PM
5

Anybody who is transparent about intentions in a skewed marketplace is naive.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 09:44 PM
7

Yeah these responses are like: you don’t like the skewed system? Go find someone else, this benefits us and is fair. Maybe I’d women mention on their profiles that they want the man to pay on the first date so men could actually find those who don’t, it may be easier.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 09:40 PM
0

Courtship is because women have more options. Would you court a friend? Courtship is just an excuse women use to demand favors and special treatment.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 09:38 PM
3

I don’t think it is necessary to explain that you want to split early. Just like the woman doesn’t announce that she doesn’t want another date. It is totally ok to decide at the end if tye date was worth it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/26 09:37 PM
18

There was a Reddit thread recently where men were sharing challenges in their lives. Like being expected by their wives to be strong. Guess what the AI summary at the top said. You guessed it - toxic masculinity. There must be a name for changing the meaning of words. Semantic appropriation? Any better ideas?
/r/MensRights17/06/26 11:44 PM
2

If women face problems it is patriarchy. If men face problems it is men again. Semantic appropriation and word games favors women.
/r/MensRights16/06/26 05:26 PM
11

I read somewhere that men donate mostly to charities which deal with poverty, education and generally non gender related. Women donate to girls education, women’s health and women shelters. They really do only empathize for themselves. Does anyone know which research body did that research. I am having trouble finding it (it was probably killed)
/r/MensRights13/05/26 03:31 PM
12

Most social media companies have sophisticated DEI programs where participation is mandatory for women and they are incentivized to make female benefitting changes to products (algorithms etc)
/r/MensRights13/05/26 03:47 AM
4

The funding disparity is in public funding. Private funding - breast cancer gets so much higher it is not even a competition. There is rarely prostate cancer focussed fund raising organizations or charitable organizations. I read somewhere the good news is that prostate cancer funding is still high per person because prostate cancer victims die quickly. I am sure that is going to be cited as a reason why this disparity is valid.
/r/MensRights09/05/26 07:12 PM
8

That probably answers why these women don't care about men being dis-identified this way. If caring about children is a shackle, not caring about their son who is a problem gender is morally ok. Interestingly, this is definitely harmful for women too, if many of them stopped to critically think about it. A lot of the health problems they face are due to feminists cancelling reality.
/r/MensRights09/05/26 05:58 PM
10

The article l/captions mentions young Americans. My point is that the editorial framing erased men from their own health crisis. That’s not a data question about other cancers — it’s a writing choice.
/r/MensRights09/05/26 05:29 PM
37

I just don't get women. This affects your sons (and your husbands if you care). Don't you care?
/r/MensRights09/05/26 04:42 PM
27

I was hanging out with a woman, I am Indian, she was East Asian . "I don't date non white men as they are usually backward, mysoginistic and lazy". It fucked me up for a whole year. I am sure every race has them, you are just rationalizing your white fetish.
/r/MensRights04/12/25 06:34 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter