TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

deepblueeverything Archive

View 1 post and 76 comments by deepblueeverything on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

deepblueeverything/r/MensRights07/11/13 10:52 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
29

Unsubbed. This sub has gone down the shitter. It used to be a place to actually discuss the issues that men faced, and now it's just a bitchfest filled with anti-women posts, this being a great example. The title is fucked up and wrong, and it doesn't even accurately reflect what is in the article, but this is the sort of rhetoric that passes here lately.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 06:27 AM
7

Huh... I guess I just didn't realize that men wearing beat up underwear was a problem. I mean, I just wear normal boxers/boxer briefs and it's not like they're super expensive so if they're getting rough I just buy new ones.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 06:31 AM
5

What the hell is ratty underwear? What exactly is the male equivalent of lingerie?
/r/MensRights26/12/13 05:46 AM
11

But men have penises. Women will never understand what it's like to have a restricted penis.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 05:29 AM
5

Yeah, thats bullshit. It is widely known. You take so many classes on the UCMJ in the military, and, at least in the AF, you have to do semi-annual refresher training. Every single person that I worked with in the AF knew that adultery and sodomy were illegal.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 04:14 AM
7

in the classic gender stereotype
/r/MensRights07/11/13 11:33 PM
4

Maybe some fields have a male majority simply because most men and women are different, and are interested in different things? Why is this such an offensive idea? The most common response I've seen for this is: Men and women have different interests because our society encourages adherence to gender roles. And gender roles are a construct of they-who-shall-not-be-named (rhymes with fatriarchy.)
/r/MensRights24/08/13 09:05 AM
-3

Bull. Even if women were allowed in combat roles centuries ago (assuming they met the same standards as the men), the ratio between men and women would still be incredibly disproportionate, given that the vast majority of women wouldn't be able to meet the standards necessary to do the job effectively. The difference in deaths would be smaller between the genders, sure, but not much smaller.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 05:33 AM
2

To expand on this, most Native cultures that use the term treat being "two-spirited" as a blessing and they are often held in high esteem within their community. I just think it's interesting that this is almost completely opposite of what we see elsewhere in the US.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 12:05 AM
5

You know, I really hate these types of surveys. I'm filling it out still, but the number of questions pertaining to whether or not I am satisfied with my body is ridiculous. Yes, I'm satisfied with my body, I've already stated that 500 times, okay? Blah.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 07:31 AM
-1

I don't really see why this is here. She's being prosecuted. System working as intended.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 03:15 AM
7

Nah, that's bullshit. I'm as MRA as they come, but it doesn't change the fact that his kids are still his kids and that he should WANT to help support them.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 11:37 PM
1

No, we don't, and you're totally right on that point.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 06:23 PM
5

Well, it seems to me that deadbeat dads are sought after for payment much more aggressively than deadbeat moms, and they are more likely to face jail time because of it. Statistics support this idea, and I've seen it happen with people around me my whole life. In Detroit, there are a whole lot of deadbeat dads and almost all of those that I have known have at least spent a night in holding because of missing payments. I've not personally seen a mom treated the same way.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 03:54 PM
8

Why would you assume it's not multiple children? My deadbeat mom was I this exact scenario. Owed my dad $180k for 3 kids and 15 years of Jon-payment.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 03:45 PM
3

In most abusive relationships, though, love becomes Stockholm Syndrome...
/r/MensRights30/01/13 06:58 AM
1

What would you say if I could prove statiscally that there was a higher chance of a woman getting raped by a man than any other form of rape? Oh, I don't deny that men are more likely to be rapists than women. If you read closely, you'll notice I said overwhelmingly more likely. Statistically, some 55-60% of rapes are conducted by men. Obviously, 40-45% by women. That is not overwhelming, but most feminists I speak to are under the assumption that less than 5% of all rapes are done by women. Thi…
/r/MensRights23/01/13 11:23 PM
1

I don't believe they suffer from MORE discrimination than men do. In fact, I think they are discriminated against less, although they are each discriminated against in different ways.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 11:14 PM
1

I believe that any person who believes that men are overwhelmingly more likely to rape than women are is an extremist because this mindset directly contributes to the discrimination and demonization of men. With that definition in mind, I think MOST feminists are extremists, because I've yet to hear of one that disagrees with the above assertion. Again, it is called mensrights because the focus is ON MEN. I do deny there is a male privilege. Read anything by Christina Hoff Summers (who was forme…
/r/MensRights23/01/13 11:11 PM
1

So apparently I didn't read half of this comment the first time around. I'll respond shortly.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 11:05 PM
1

Perhaps I should elaborate. I don't feel the need to combat affirmative action because black people still face horrid discrimination today that white people aren't affected by. The likelihood of a black person going to prison for a minor drug offense, for instance, is remarkably higher than that of a white person. This discrimination is unwarranted, obviously, and I know it's not the direct reason for affirmative action practices, it kind of balances out. I'd rather have a harder time getting in…
/r/MensRights23/01/13 11:03 PM
1

What aren't you understanding? I don't care about the moderate feminists because they are in the minority and they have no power to change anything within the movement. I generalize because these people don't matter in the context of the argument, and they're doing themselves a disservice by using the feminist label. I am white. I don't feel the need to be a part of a Caucasian rights group to combat affirmative action because it has only affected me in small, insignificant ways throughout my li…
/r/MensRights23/01/13 10:49 PM
1

When the moderates are the minority in a movement why focus on them? Your argument is the exact opposite of those who criticize atheists for attacking religion. In the case of feminism, the extremists are the majority. It should also be said that MR is anti-feminism but NOT anti-egalitarianism. It's just that many of us believe that feminism is not an equality movement. If it were, it would take steps to undo the perceptions of men that it has created. Instead, feminists further the demonization…
/r/MensRights23/01/13 09:23 PM
1

I think MRs focus is more on combating the negative effects that feminism has had on men. It is exactly opposite of feminism in this regard. The focus is on the rights of men primarily and attempts to change the perception that don't need help. We aren't actively trying to mak life more difficult for women in the process. Again, the focus is on men's rights. Our movement hasn't been corrupted by extremist MRAs so there is no need to distance ourselves from the label. There's no need for me to be…
/r/MensRights23/01/13 07:33 PM
1

They'd be pissed, but they'd be wrong. And in my mind, that's what should matter. Fuck political correctness.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 06:52 PM
1

No, what I'm saying is that the label "feminist" has been corrupted by extremism within the movement on a scale that is not ignorable. The number of extremist feminists is proportional much higher than extremist MRAs because more people sympathize with the idea that "men are evil". You probably share some form of this sentiment yourself. We all do. Feminism has promoted the idea that men are rapists and abusers for so long, it has become a part of our culture and has detrimentally affected the l…
/r/MensRights23/01/13 06:50 PM
2

I don't agree with this. Part of my reason for being an MRA is that I believe there is a pervasive perception that most women believe that men are dangerous and not to be trusted. This comes from the feminist mentality. Shit, even men feel this way. I think there are far more egalitarian MRAs than feminists simply because feminists think men are dangerous.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 03:50 PM
3

He's hardly "responsible" for her paranoia. Her paranoia is a symptom of a society that likes to irrationally scare people. That has nothing to do with him. He shouldn't have to take measures to calm the irrational paranoia of someone who effectively doesn't matter to him.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 09:45 AM
2

Source for your claim that states recognize rape as a "bi-gender" ordeal?
/r/MensRights20/01/13 09:43 AM
6

Because the odds of being mugged by some random person on the street are much more likely than the odds of being raped.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 09:42 AM
7

Dude, have you ever had burnt toast?
/r/MensRights12/01/13 04:09 AM
6

As someone who has/does four of the five, I concur.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 03:04 AM
3

My thoughts and opinions do not accurately represent those "held by this sub". I am an individual, with my own thoughts and ideas.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 12:29 AM
8

This is something that really bothers me.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 10:11 PM
5

It's been a few weeks, but I recently read a study suggesting that single men's desire for marriage is at an all time low. I think this is what he's referring to. The fact of the matter is that women still want to get married, and men are increasingly less likely to share that desire, thus "harming" women. I don't think that women are helpless on their own or unable to fend for themselves, but as long as they want to marry a "good man" (ie, one who does whatever they want), they're gonna be out …
/r/MensRights06/01/13 09:42 PM
5

No, obviously I understand that, but there needs to be some semblance of equality for the rights in the case that it does happen. As it stands, the woman is the only one who gets a choice after conception.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 09:37 PM
5

I agree with this, but in cases in which the condom doesn't work (or breaks without either party realizing), what then?
/r/MensRights06/01/13 09:10 PM
1

I have not seen this once and I've been frequenting this subreddit for a long time. Do you have any examples?
/r/MensRights05/01/13 10:49 AM
1

I'm having a hard time understanding what you're really getting at here. You say it's a reversal of the "don't go in a dark alley by yourself" mentality. I can see that, but I don't understand what that has to do with anything. The "dark alley rape" mentality is complete fearmongering. Of all the rapes that occur against women 90% of them are raped by someone they know (50% family and 40% friends/acquaintances). This means that roughly 1/60th of women in the US are raped by someone they don't kn…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 05:50 AM
4

Feminism granted my mother immediate custody of my siblings and I when my parents got a divorce. She was addicted to various drugs at the time and was incapable of holding a job because she had a 6th grade education. She kidnapped us, denying visitation to my father, and we didn't see him for a year. After thousands of dollars worth of legal fees, my father managed to get full time custody of my siblings and I, and my mother was told to pay child support. She never paid a dime. She was never arr…
/r/MensRights30/12/12 07:21 PM
17

Bullshit.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 02:23 AM
2

What's wrong with using people for sex, if it's consensual and mutual use?
/r/MensRights06/12/12 05:36 PM
4

As long as they're women.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 06:41 AM
3

I really appreciate your response, as hard as it may be for you to admit it. I know this probably won't help you much, but just remember what you said yourself: you have nothing to be worried about. The likelihood of it happening once was already small enough, the likelihood of it happening again is exponentially smaller. I guess the only real advice I can give you (I've never been sexually assaulted, but I was subject to some brutal physical abuse as a child) is that while it will probably neve…
/r/MensRights06/12/12 04:52 AM
1

I was just curious. My theory is that your lack of fear directly correlates with the lack of "hype" within the media surrounding rape against men. I think women are mislead by statistics to believe that they are at risk of rape at any given moment, resulting in an irrational fear of rape. Men aren't subject to the same sort of "fearmongering" so it makes the whole risk wholly less frightening.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 03:06 AM
2

Might I ask your gender?
/r/MensRights06/12/12 02:59 AM
9

It seems like you are already less fearful of rape than many women who have never actually been sexually assaulted. Odd.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 09:30 PM
2

I think it sounds like someone whose native language isn't English.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 04:01 PM
1

You still have to pass the PT test every six months (or annually if you do exceptionally well).
/r/MensRights04/12/12 07:47 PM
2

I personally believe that the kid probably wanted the sex to happen. Not because he's a man (and all men are sex driven fiends /s) but because she was sexually appealing. And outside of the moral quandary about whether teachers should be allowed to have relationships with their students, I think such a situation is totally okay. I don't believe he was "taken advantage of". Similarly, I think if a 15 year old girl wanted to have sex with an older man that she found sexually appealing, she should …
/r/MensRights03/12/12 10:26 PM
1

Recent estimates put that number at close to 120 billion.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 09:59 PM
1

I agree with this. I think that if he weren't willing to talk about it, he wouldn't have brought it up in the first place.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 09:41 PM
2

Honestly, I don't think there is anything wrong with this, as long as its a mutual "objectification". If two people decide they want to use each other for sex and that's it, that's fine, in my opinion. If the same person is lucky enough to find hundreds of other people with which to share such an experience, more power to him/her. I think one thing that will help men's rights immensely is more sex positivity. Most of us are very sexual creatures and it's not something we should be ashamed of.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 04:52 PM
1

Not sure why you were downvoted. A friend of mine just had it done and he was down for 3 days from work and then came back no problem.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 09:19 PM
1

If I were OP, I would stay together for the kids and just stop having sex with the wife (and get my sex from other women.) This one is totally on the wife.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 09:08 PM
29

This is exactly the kind of shit that I hate, too, and probably one of the things that pisses me off the most. My crack-addicted mother kidnapped my siblings and I when I was 4, while my father was out to sea in the Navy, supporting our family. She took us to a foreign country and was granted immediate custody. She later decided that she no longer wanted anything to do with us, gave us to my Dad (who was forced to leave the Navy) and he took better care of us than she ever could. But the stigma …
/r/MensRights21/11/12 06:50 AM
8

Bieber is an adult who recoiled in horror in front of a large audience. Are we to say that his doing so is because he's a pussy or something? No? Okay, that's the difference. Halle could very well have consented to it before hand. Her reaction would seem to suggest that. There was obviously no consent at all on Biebers part.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 04:56 AM
1

My friends have been really cool about it. They haven't acted weird or anything. They have tried to warn me that it means "she's cheating" but I told them that isn't the case and they dropped it. Most of the time, no one even mentions it. My one friend thinks it's hypocritical, but meh.
/r/seduction20/11/12 04:05 AM
2

I go with friends, and yeah, they know. I'm thinking about going by myself though, because they aren't exactly the best wingmen.
/r/seduction20/11/12 02:11 AM
2

What do you think of possibly using my wife as a wingman in the capacity of allowing other girls to believe that we are just friends? I mean, my wife is attractive, so seeing me with her and not pursuing her could potentially increase my attractiveness.
/r/seduction19/11/12 11:57 PM
5

I can't imagine even the most socially awkward SAP do the second option.
/r/seduction19/11/12 11:17 PM
2

The "What do you guys think?" was asking specifically about how to ask women out. Not about whether you though my relationship with my wife was morally sound or in jeopardy.
/r/seduction19/11/12 09:22 PM
2

It's passable for me, I'm not particularly attached to it, but my wife does like it, and I imagine I could have a good time at such an event. Thanks for the advice.
/r/seduction19/11/12 08:03 PM
3

I'm a 23 year old, attractive white male. As far as what I'm looking for: 18-35, fit, similarly attractive (or better) and no type in particular, really. I should mention that despite my age, I have no real connections within the "college culture". If I did, I'm sure that would make things a lot easier, but I can't really enter the college scene without looking like a creeper.
/r/seduction19/11/12 07:39 PM
1

Thanks, I guess I just thought it would be best to be straight-forward with it, but I see now that's not the case.
/r/seduction19/11/12 07:38 PM
2

Good point. However, I do know what has worked thus far in my relationship and that DOES fall in line with some of the other comments in here. This one implies that if I pursue "swinging" or whatever you want to call it, that bad shit will happen within my relationship. I know this already to be the opposite. It has actually improved our relationship and made it stronger (especially sexually.)
/r/seduction19/11/12 07:37 PM
5

Heh, we don't wear a ring anyway. We each have tattoos in the others handwriting instead.
/r/seduction19/11/12 06:03 PM
6

Normally, I'd agree with this. Unfortunately, my wife is an incredibly socially awkward woman and absolutely can NOT hold a conversation with someone she hasn't known for a long time. That leaves me to do all the talking. In fact, she gave me permission to sleep with other women because of this reason. She realized that logically, the easiest thing to do would be for me to seduce someone on my own and later introduce the idea of the threesome.
/r/seduction19/11/12 05:50 PM
3

You are someone who has no experience pertaining to my relationship and you have no idea what kind of relationship my wife and I have. That said, I don't agree with your opinion and I have been told the same many times before.
/r/seduction19/11/12 05:47 PM
1

Do I actually qualify as a swinger if my wife only plays with other women only when I'm present?
/r/seduction19/11/12 05:43 PM
1

As someone who is married to a woman who is NOT like this, I disagree. Maybe I'm just lucky, though.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 12:30 AM
1

Though not a victim of sexual abuse, I was a victim of traumatic physical and emotional abuse. I agree with you completely. There are many lingering effects, sure, but for the most part I an a stringer person for having had such difficult experiences.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 03:35 AM
5

No, only women. If women drink, they "aren't I their right mind" and can't give consent or make decisions. If men drink, they are held fully responsible for all actions they may take and for all things that might happen.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 10:51 AM
1

It's honestly the best expansion.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 10:41 AM
1

Most people will never understand what it is like to be the minority in a group of minorities.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 05:33 AM
1

Yeah, this is not true at all. I work with a number of people who are single income earners in a household with stay at home wives and kids and they only make ~30k a year. They're doing fine. Sure, they can't have the extravagant lifestyles that most Americans would like but they're still living relatively comfortably.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 11:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter