TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

deltusverilan Archive

View 0 posts and 41 comments by deltusverilan on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Sadly, that only makes things more difficult.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/01/19 08:56 PM
2

I can do it, but I have a mild case of Musculoskeletal EDS, so I'm a lot more flexible than most men. It helps that I can painlessly dislocate both hips.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/01/19 07:22 PM
1

That's only one Link.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/01/19 06:50 PM
4

My thoughts? Homeschooling.
/r/MensRights27/05/11 05:01 PM
6

Nailed it. WineWhine below says exactly this.
/r/MensRights23/05/11 08:37 PM
2

Push the pendulum too far, and you won't like it when it swings back.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 09:15 PM
18

Yes. Yes there are. Never underestimate the power of human stupidity.
/r/MensRights06/04/11 08:39 PM
1

Just because human natured is flawed doesn't mean we can't take a stand and try to make it better. Tilt at windmills if you like. But leave the government out of it. If anything can make things worse, it's the government putting their fingers in the pie. And I highly doubt women will outlaw sexist humor. I don't. Freedom of speech is very important to a lot of people of both genders and not all women are going to want to apply a double-standard. Freedom of speech is losing ground rapidly to poli…
/r/MensRights23/03/11 03:45 PM
1

You're fighting human nature. Regardless of how nice it would be if it weren't the case, women as a group are taking out their frustrations and hostilities on men as a group, and men as a group are retaliating. Women are using (and abusing) the law in addition to sexist humor. Men are just using sexist humor. But that's not going to last much longer. Pretty soon women will outlaw sexist humor when it's against women. Then men will have to find some other outlet for their frustrations. If we're l…
/r/MensRights23/03/11 03:21 PM
1

It's not so much that don't have a problem with jokes made about men on TV, it's that I don't have a problem with retaliation. I don't hold with, "two wrongs don't make a right." It's not about "wrong" and "right". It's about consequences. If you hit me, I hit you. "It takes two to have a fight," they say. I say, "But it only takes one to deliver a beating." If someone can deliver a beating without consequence, why wouldn't they? Niceness? They've already proven they aren't nice. They hit you. I…
/r/MensRights23/03/11 02:46 PM
1

They are related. Men do hear women making, if not identical jokes, equally male-dismissive jokes every night on the evening sit-coms. Every. Fucking. Night. So if some men choose to get some of their own back making these kinds of jokes in an internet message board, it's only to be expected. I mangled the idiom somewhat, as that's the way I heard it, but google "What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander."
/r/MensRights23/03/11 02:13 PM
1

1) No point. Bringing politics into a stand-up club is about as welcome as bringing a skunk to a wedding reception. 2) We do, every evening on what passes for entertainment on TV. 3) What's sauce for the goose is good for the gander. Take your pick
/r/MensRights22/03/11 10:10 PM
1

Actually, this is what happens when the federal government gets involved in local matters. It starts looking around for tools, and when the only tool you have is a left-handed socket wrench with an 11.5mm aperture, then everything that isn't an 11.5mm bolt gets whacked on the head with a wrench. Bullying isn't a federal issue, and they don't have the right tools for it. It's a local issue, and the local governments do have the right tools for it. They just won't use them.
/r/MensRights21/03/11 03:36 PM
3

I have an alternate proposal, which mirrors my proposal for women who do not wish to be raped. Wear no badges. Carry a gun. If someone attacks you, shoot them.
/r/MensRights18/03/11 07:03 PM
2

I believe the word you're looking for is "misanthropic."
/r/MensRights18/03/11 04:14 PM
4

Liberal bedwetter (not redundant terms) bleeding heart laws. Pure idiocy. Also: Why is this here?
/r/MensRights10/03/11 04:55 PM
1

If they pony up the money to start the company (or to buy it), they can be. If they haven't, that's called theft.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 08:54 PM
1

I believe a man's (or woman's) right to democratic control of their workplace is every bit as fundamental as their right to democratic of their government (or whatever replaces government after the revolution). The two are parallel, but in opposite directions. In a democracy, the government works for the people. The duties and responsibilities of the government is delegated to the elected officials, and if the officials displease their employers, then they get fired. In a company, the employees …
/r/MensRights09/03/11 08:34 PM
1

I support the right of free men to associate as they please. I support the right of free men to demand anything they like. I support the right of free men of whom things are demanded to laugh at those who demand them. I support the right of free men of whom things are demanded to accede to demands. I do not support the right of one group of men to use force upon free men to coerce said free men to behave in a manner that pleases them. I do not support the right of men to call upon the government…
/r/MensRights09/03/11 07:27 PM
-5

If a man wants to make the decision that his life is worth that little, then that is his right. More practically, desperate miners are either 1) incompetent 2) think they are desperate when they aren't or 3) suffering a temporary setback that may call for a short-term solution that calls for a bit of risk. Or, 4) need to find a new line of work.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 06:36 PM
-1

If a miner thinks that working in the mine is too dangerous, he should quit, and either seek employment with a better mining company, or find a safer occupation.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 06:00 PM
1

the solution to the problems they manage to correctly identify is … more feminism. Sort of like the solution to the problems caused by socialism is... more socialism. The best of them are fools. The worst are hostile.
/r/MensRights09/03/11 04:54 PM
12

Unsurprisingly, the woman's article is about women, though it takes the opportunity to take a few cheap shots at men. Also unsurprisingly, the man's article is about women, though it takes the opportunity to take a few cheap shots at men.
/r/MensRights07/03/11 11:24 PM
0

I have to say I concur.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 04:03 PM
5

A miserable human being.
/r/MensRights10/02/11 09:47 PM
1

It's satire.
/r/MensRights04/01/11 01:00 AM
7

Men who have juvenile hobbies such as comic book or action figure collections. This is a huge sign that they're not all the way grown up. "Critics who treat adult as a term of approval, instead of as a merely descriptive term, cannot be adult themselves. To be concerned about being grown up, to admire the grown up because it is grown up, to blush at the suspicion of being childish; these things are the marks of childhood and adolescence. And in childhood and adolescence they are, in moderation, …
/r/MensRights04/01/11 12:13 AM
0

Didn't you know that logic and reasoning are just tools of the patriarchy and dead white men used to oppress the lower classes? /sarcasm
/r/MensRights22/12/10 06:11 PM
1

Interesting article, but bad science. The reason for the life expectancy differences is not entirely based on geography. Part of it is diet, part of it is ancestry, part of it is medicine, and part of it is politics, as well as culture. Not only that, he has rejected countries with longer lifespans for men to concentrate on those where women don't live as long. He seems willing to shave years off of his lifespan just to be able to see women die before he does. Not smart.
/r/MensRights22/12/10 04:00 PM
2

When will it become OK for MEN to be the victims? Right now. Men (especially straight white men) are the only unprotected class remaining.
/r/MensRights16/12/10 04:07 PM
2

I have requested that this piece run as an article at goodmenproject.com Odds on it being run? I'd give it less than 10%.
/r/MensRights09/12/10 08:07 PM
2

Sad but true.
/r/MensRights03/12/10 05:20 PM
2

The original was deliberately phrased so as to obfuscate her meaning. I rendered it into a more understandable format. Stop using literal meanings of idioms to score rhetorical points in an attempt to dismiss the actual point. This is not an oxford debate club meeting, you have scored no points with me.
/r/MensRights02/12/10 05:03 PM
0

"Penetrative intercourse is, by its nature, violent. But I'm not saying that sex must be rape. What I think is that sex must not put women in a subordinate position. It must be reciprocal and not an act of aggression from a man looking only to satisfy himself. That's my point." That's not much better. Translated into english: "Penetrative intercourse is rape. Unless it's B&D. And the woman is the Dominant. Otherwise, keep it to other, non-penetrative forms, like hand jobs, fingering and cunnilin…
/r/MensRights01/12/10 11:20 PM
1

No, she should have been jailed for filing false statements.
/r/MensRights29/11/10 03:57 PM
2

"That word does not mean what you (seem to) think it means." Homophobic means that it fears or hates homosexuals. It is, in fact misandric, as it "hates" all males, regardless of sexual orientation. That homosexual males can't marry merely results in this law being even more onerous for homosexuals than it is for heterosexuals. This really qualifies it for "homosexual unfriendly" at worst.
/r/MensRights19/11/10 07:43 PM
1

Gosh! Really? Then I suppose by this logic, we should abolish the entire tax code. Horrors! :sarcasm off
/r/MensRights19/11/10 06:03 PM
7

What a total bitch. She should be arrested.
/r/MensRights19/11/10 05:38 PM
1

For a year? Seriously? I was going to comment on how she took for granted that of course she could assault her SO on camera and get away with it, because when a guy hits a girl, that's monstrous, but when a girl hits a guy that's just her putting him in his place. But I thought I was going to be at least a little over the top with it. This situation would appear to be beyond parody.
/r/MensRights19/11/10 05:31 PM
2

Why should I care more about someone's child than they do, when it is risky for me to do so? I'd spend an hour or two of my life to save someone else's child. I won't spend my life, livelihood, reputation, freedom, etc. to do so. And, unlike the man in the article, I won't lose a moment's sleep over my decision. It is not I who has created this environment. It is, in fact, the very people who have been demonizing my gender since I was a child. They have sown this seed, and they shall reap the bi…
/r/MensRights28/10/10 05:31 PM
1

There but for the grace, not of god, but of my father, go I.
/r/MensRights27/10/10 04:19 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter