TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

demisilent Archive

View 0 posts and 7 comments by demisilent on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

While they date you, sure. I want the same, that’s a principal feature of monogamy. But people have lives, are complex and messy, and things happen. And that’s ok. That’s a principal feature of being human. For you to have that standard that I presume you don’t have for yourself is so sad. I’m sad for you, genuinely, if you perhaps see someone you’re dating who’s had sex before as damaged goods. I just don’t see how if you end up having sex with someone and someone denies YOU later on in life ba…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/20 03:23 PM
0

Well I’m a gay man so... nah. Gay dudes just don’t care about this kind of thing in a relationship lmao. Good try tho.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/20 08:27 AM
0

Ok I swear I was gonna go to bed but I got the notification lol. Yes, obviously with context. But I bet if I said “she’s a real flurbengurder” with a sultry tone and raised eyebrows you’d probably gather what that word means, even if it’s 100% fake. That’s how context and intonation works so yeah, dude. Doesn’t add to the validity of your point. Last and final point - a P R E V I O U S L Y promiscuous partner does NOT ensure promiscuity in an agreed upon monogamous relationship. If you cannot ta…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/20 08:13 AM
-1

I didn’t turn this into something about me. It’s not about me. I used relevant anecdotal examples based off personal experiences. This post is and always has been about breaking down why your specific train of thought is anti-woman. It was never about me. And no, for the millionth time, if you ever said “she’s friendly” I would have no fucking clue you were making an insinuation to her sexual behavior and I truly can’t imagine anyone in this century understanding it to mean that either. This was…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/20 07:57 AM
-4

Holy shit, what planet are you on? I knew SO MANY men who absolutely loved being called “ladies’ man” and “womanizer” and “player” and “heartbreaker” and oh my god I could go on. Some of them grew up and saw that was childish. Some didn’t. “Friendly”??? YOU made that up. That doesn’t exist. That’s just... not a thing hahaha. I can agree with you that if someone’s dealbreaker is my sexual history then I’ll happily move on. I mean they’re gonna be way too judgmental for me to continue seriously da…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/20 07:30 AM
-7

You’re not actually saying anything here then. If your point is preferences, then yeah, obviously everyone gets how preferences work. I like blondes. You might like tall people. What people take issue with is how that “preference” is misplaced. It’s not really a “preference”. It’s a judgement. For one, it’s typically only used as a measure of judgement against women. “Womanizer” is seen as a compliment for men, but we don’t have a positive word for a woman who sleeps around. Men generally get pr…
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/20 07:18 AM
-16

It’s because referring to a human being as an “open business” reveals more about you than it does about that person. People have sex. You gonna put a number on the appropriate amount of individuals one can have sex with to be your perfect partner? That’s a really warped view on sexual behavior, dude. People can be monogamous and faithful and still have a history of sexual partners. And for the record, no one believes it when you say “doesn’t matter the gender.”
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/20 06:59 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter